Let the electrolyte permittivity be and let be the inverse Debye–Hückel screening length. We reserve for the imposed lateral wavevector. In the Debye–Hückel approximation, linearization about an electrically neutral bulk electrolyte gives
away from fixed charges. For ionic species of valence and bulk number density , ; the approximation requires . Substitution of a lateral cosine into this screened Poisson equation leaves a vertical decay constant
The screened sinusoidal surface-charge mode thus decays faster than a laterally uniform charge mode. A nonzero retains a finite decay length even in the zero-salt limit.
The exterior media and their boundary conditions are not specified in the paper. Specifying the two surface charge densities alone does not fix the normal derivative on the inside unless the outside response is also fixed. We first take the confined-gap idealization, with the prescribed charge supplying all the displacement flux into the electrolyte between the sheets. The electrostatic interface boundary conditions are then
This is, for example, the limit of negligible exterior displacement admittance. The electrostatic potential solving these conditions and the Debye–Hückel approximation equation is
Differentiation checks the two surface signs directly. This solution allows a sine as well as a cosine lateral component when the phase is nonzero.
In linear screened electrostatics, the quadratic charging free energy is . It is equivalently with the stated boundary conditions. The second term represents the linearized ionic response; integrating only the bare electric field energy would omit it. If denotes membrane area, the wavelength-averaged energy density is
Using and gives the phase registration of screened charged sheets energy
The positive cosine coefficient shows that, for nonzero charge amplitude and finite separation,
At the minimum the electrostatic potential simplifies to . Positive and negative charge patches face opposite signs across the gap. The two charge patterns therefore favor a half-wavelength lateral offset rather than like-charge alignment.
For comparison, if identical electrolyte fills all of space on both sides of infinitesimally thin charge sheets, the electrostatic interface boundary conditions are continuity of , decay at infinity, and the charge-induced derivative jumps
Superposing the two screened sinusoidal surface-charge modes gives, in particular between the sheets,
Its full-space continuation replaces each vertical distance by the corresponding absolute distance. Evaluating the electrostatic potential on both sheets now yields
The constant term is the two isolated-sheet self energies, and the cosine term is their screened interaction. The energy depends on the exterior convention, but both stated physical idealizations give the same phase registration of screened charged sheets: unlike charge patches oppose each other. In the full-space convention the optimum interaction energy is , giving an attractive normal force density . Phase sensitivity becomes exponentially weak for ; if or the separation tends to infinity there is no selected phase.
One can also display how an exterior dielectric response interpolates between these cases. Let be its normal displacement admittance for this lateral Fourier mode: for the confined-gap idealization, for identical exterior electrolyte, and for an ion-free exterior dielectric. Define
The symmetric and antisymmetric surface-charge combinations give
Since , its cosine coefficient is positive. This makes the phase-minimizing conclusion robust while exposing the boundary information needed for an absolute electrostatic energy.
A lateral sinusoidal surface charge density with wave number in the Debye–Hückel approximation generates vertical exponential or hyperbolic functions with inverse length . In a homogeneous electrolyte filling all space, an isolated sheet at produces . Boundary conditions determine the normalization when the electrolyte occupies only a gap.