Let be continuous on , bounded above, and suppose its limit superior at from the right is at most . If some has , then attains its maximum on . A sufficiently short initial interval has all values below . On the remaining closed interval, the extreme value theorem supplies a maximum, which is consequently global. This can prove attainment despite an oscillatory discontinuity at one endpoint.
If is Riemann integrable and is Lipschitz on an interval containing the range of , then is Riemann integrable. With Lipschitz constant , the oscillation on each partition cell satisfies , and hence the gap between Darboux sums is multiplied by at most . A continuously differentiable is Lipschitz on each closed bounded interval by the mean value theorem and the extreme value theorem applied to .
Local maximum of Brownian motion 2026-10-06
The times of local maxima of a Brownian motion path are dense in the half-line almost surely, and every such local maximum is a strict local maximum. Density follows from nowhere monotonicity of Brownian motion and the extreme value theorem. Strictness follows by checking that maxima over separated rational compact time intervals are unequal; the increment across their gap supplies an independent nondegenerate normal distribution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 ia Paper 1 4D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 ib Paper 4 1A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 ia Paper 1 12C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 ia Paper 1 11B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ia Paper 1 12E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ib Paper 4 14F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ia Paper 1 11E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ia Paper 1 10D c i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 ia Paper 1 10D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 ia Paper 1 11D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 ia Paper 1 10F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 ia Paper 1 3E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
A continuous function at satisfies the following quantified condition:The choice of may depend on and .
For the bounded example, takeThis is a continuous function on its domain and . Along its values tend to , while along its values tend to . Hence the supremum is and the infimum is , and neither is attained. “Upper and lower bound” here means the least upper and greatest lower bounds.
For the nonnegative function on the whole real line, if the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise choose with . The limits at both infinities give such that whenever . By the extreme value theorem, a continuous function on the compact interval has a maximum there. Since , it also exceeds every value outside this interval. Thus is bounded above and attains its global maximum. Nonnegativity ensures that either the function is zero or such a positive comparison value exists; without it, a function such as would have an unattained supremum of zero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 ia Paper 1 4F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-07
The extreme value theorem ensures that is finite. Since and , multiplication preserves the inequality. Monotonicity of the Riemann integral gives the required boundTo prove the weighted mean value theorem for integrals, put and . If , then , so any works. This includes .
If , the extreme value theorem gives and . Integrating gives . A continuous function on an interval takes every value between its minimum and maximum by the intermediate value theorem. Choose with . Consequently
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 38 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let . The feasible probability simplex is a nonempty compact convex set, so the extreme value theorem guarantees a minimizer. Its Hessian matrix is diagonal with positive entries , making a strictly convex function. Hence the minimizer is unique.
Use the Lagrange multipliers for the sum constraint and for . The Lagrangian isThe KKT conditions areA strictly positive feasible allocation exists, so the Slater condition holds. These conditions are necessary and sufficient for this convex optimization. At least one coordinate is positive, giving . Put . For a positive coordinate, complementary slackness gives . At a zero coordinate, stationarity gives , or . ThusHere . This logarithmic water filling raises the smaller baseline values to a common level. The scalar left side is a continuous function and strictly increasing above , starts at zero, and tends to infinity, so exactly one solves it. One can find it by interval bisection, or sort the baseline values increasingly and find an index for whichusing . Equality at the next baseline simply gives a zero allocation. Sorting and a running sum implement the water-filling algorithm in time.