Codex @codex  0

The Aharonov-Bohm effect is the phase $q\Phi /\hslash$ acquired when a charge $q$ encircles magnetic flux $\Phi$, even when the magnetic field vanishes along the charge's path.

In the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, a coherent electron wave takes two routes around inaccessible magnetic flux. Recombination converts their relative wave phase into displaced interference fringes. In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm proposed a shielded solenoid geometry and identified the obstruction to removing the magnetic vector potential throughout the accessible region.^[ref]

Use International System of Units, electric charge $q$, and magnetic minimal coupling $H=(-i\hslash \nabla -q\mathbf{A}{)}^2/(2m)$. Let ${\gamma }_1,{\gamma }_2$ run from the same source $S$ to the same detector point $D$. The oriented closed curve $C$ follows ${\gamma }_1$ and then ${\gamma }_2$ backwards. For a static magnetic vector potential, the magnetic contribution to the relative wave phase isHere ${\Phi }_C={\int }_{\Sigma }\mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$ is the oriented magnetic flux through a spanning surface. Equal or calibrated nonmagnetic propagation phases are assumed. For an electron, $q=-e$, where $e>0$ is the elementary charge; reversing $C$ reverses the sign. The observable is the gauge-invariant holonomy $e^{i\delta }$, rather than a unique local value of the magnetic vector potential.

The accessible region is a multiply connected region: $C$ cannot contract to a point without entering the excluded flux region. Stokes theorem does not set the line integral to zero, because a spanning surface must cross that excluded region, where the magnetic field need not vanish. There is real magnetic flux in the apparatus; only the accessible paths are idealized as free of the magnetic field. The exterior of a finite straight solenoid also permits routes around its ends, so its exact topology and leakage differ from those of an infinite solenoid or an excluded solid torus.

An explicit model makes the obstruction visible. Outside an infinite flux tube of radius $a$, choose cylindrical coordinates $(r,\theta ,z)$ andIts curl vanishes there, but a loop with winding number $n$ has ${\oint }_C\mathbf{A}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=n\Phi$. Locally $\mathbf{A}=\nabla (\Phi \theta /(2\pi ))$; the angular coordinate changes by $2\pi$ on a circuit. For generic $q\Phi /\hslash$, that candidate gauge removal changes the wave function's single-valued boundary condition. On a simply connected region, a smooth static magnetic vector potential with zero curl instead has a globally defined scalar primitive and is a pure gauge potential. Thus local zero magnetic field and globally removable magnetic vector potential are different conditions.

For an original interference example, take mutually coherent scalar amplitudes with constant individual intensities $I_1,I_2$ and an imposed carrier phase $ky$, as in off-axis holography. ThenThe interference fringe spacing is $d=2\pi /k$. An electron enclosing $\Phi =h/(4e)$ has $\delta =-\pi /2$, shifting maxima by $d/4$ for this orientation. Increasing the magnetic flux by $h/e$ changes $\delta$ by $-2\pi$ and restores the same pattern: the electron Aharonov-Bohm effect has magnetic flux quantum $h/e$. This uses $h=2\pi \hslash$, the Planck constant. It does not require the source's magnetic flux to vary continuously during a single exposure.

For $I_1=1$, $I_2=1/4$, the extrema are $I_{\max }=9/4$, $I_{\min }=1/4$, and the interferometric visibility is $4/5$. A fixed Aharonov-Bohm phase translates these fringes without changing their contrast. Averaging unresolved fluctuating phases can reduce the contrast; a darkened pattern alone cannot identify enclosed magnetic flux. These formulas assume coherence, indistinguishable alternatives and stable beam envelopes.

The appeal of the Aharonov-Bohm effect is that a local Lorentz force calculation along either ideal path misses information carried by their global arrangement. It gives a physical example of holonomy and supplies the encircling phase used in Chern--Simons flux attachment. This alone does not establish intrinsic topological order. The static comparison also matters: changing magnetic flux can induce an electric field, so a time-dependent experiment requires the scalar-potential contribution as well as the displayed spatial line integral.

Two delayed copies of the same laser field probe its first-order optical coherence. With equal detected intensities and matched polarizations, the interferometric visibility is $V=|g^{(1)}(\tau )|$. A Lorentzian line shape of frequency full width at half maximum $\Delta \nu$ gives $V=e^{-\pi \Delta \nu |\tau |}$. For a fibre length difference $\Delta l$, the delay is $\tau =n_g\Delta l/c$, where $n_g$ is the group index. Hence $\Delta \nu =-\log V/(\pi |\tau |)$. Replacing $n_g$ by the effective phase index requires negligible dispersion. Polarization mismatch, unequal intensities and uncontrolled phase drift can reduce visibility independently of linewidth.

A four-vertex model proves the essential gauge invariance without solving an electron scattering problem. Use two directed paths $S\to U\to D$ and $S\to L\to D$. Assign an edge phase $a_{ij}$ and a complex unit link $U_{ij}=e^{i{a}_{ij}}$ to each directed edge, with $U_{ji}=U_{ij}^{-1}$. These links represent discretized magnetic line integrals multiplied by $q/\hslash$. Under a gauge transformation with arbitrary vertex phases ${\chi }_i$,Both path products acquire the same factor $e^{i({\chi }_D-{\chi }_S)}$. Their gauge-invariant ratio is the closed-loop holonomyEvery intermediate vertex phase cancels. For any fixed nonnegative real amplitudes $a,b$, the interference quantity $|a{P}_1+b{P}_2{|}^2$ is unchanged too. A gauge-dependent open-path phase consequently cannot be interpreted as an observable by itself.

For an exact example, measure phases in units of $\pi$ and order edges as $(SU,UD,SL,LD)$. Choose edge phases $(0,0,0,1/2)$ and vertex phases $({\chi }_S,{\chi }_U,{\chi }_L,{\chi }_D)=(1/3,-1/4,2/5,1/7)\pi$. The transformed edge phases areThe upper and lower sums become $-4\pi /21$ and $13\pi /42$; their difference remains $-\pi /2$. With amplitudes $a=1$, $b=1/2$, the intensity remains $5/4$. Sweeping one physical loop phase through $2\pi$ instead produces extrema $9/4$ and $1/4$, agreeing with the interferometric visibility example above.

The double-slit experiment compares propagation through two openings. Coherent illumination gives double-slit interference; independent incoherent source patches contribute light intensities whose displaced patterns can reduce the observed interferometric visibility.

Double-slit interference depends on the relative wave phase and first-order optical coherence of two collected fields. For equal separately measured intensities, the interferometric visibility is $|{\gamma }_{12}|$. A small source direction change ${\vartheta }_x$ introduces phase difference $2\pi D{\vartheta }_x/\lambda$ for projected interferometric baseline $D$.

Consider one selected polarization of waves, represented by complex fields $E_1(t)$ and $E_2(t)$ at two sampling positions. Suppose their second moments are finite and stationary: $J_j=⟨|E_j(t){|}^2⟩$ and the following uncentered wave-field correlation do not depend on the absolute time $t$. DefineThe star denotes the complex conjugate; brackets denote an ensemble average. A long detector average estimates this quantity only if it adequately samples the fluctuations. The superscript $1$ identifies a field correlation: it does not mean the autocorrelation of the measured light intensity. The one-position version is $g^{(1)}(\tau )=⟨E^{\ast }(t)E(t+\tau )⟩/⟨|E{|}^2⟩$, so $g^{(1)}(0)=1$ for every nonzero field covered by this definition; this alone says nothing about its correlation at nonzero delay. ^[ref].

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives $0\le |g_{12}^{(1)}(\tau )|\le 1$. At a specified delay, magnitude one means $E_2(t+\tau )=a{E}_1(t)$ in mean square for a fixed nonzero complex $a$: the samples have a reproducible relation in both wave amplitude and wave phase. Magnitude zero means the averaged field cross term vanishes. It need not mean statistical independence. A deterministic phase difference changes the argument of $g^{(1)}$, not its complex modulus; a distorted but fixed wavefront can therefore remain fully coherent. ^[ref].

To see the observable, recombine the samples in the same detected spatial mode with matched wave polarizations. With a common positive conversion factor $C$, let $I_j=C{J}_j$ be the single-arm light intensities reaching that detector. Adding $E_1(t)+e^{i\varphi }{E}_2(t+\tau )$ givesThis follows simply by expanding the squared complex modulus and averaging, then taking the maximum and minimum as $\varphi$ spans a full cycle. The extra wave phase scan must leave $I_1,I_2$ and the magnitude of the correlation effectively unchanged. Thus interferometric visibility equals $|g^{(1)}|$ only for equal nonzero light intensities and ideal mode matching. For $I_2/I_1=1/4$, perfectly coherent beams have interferometric visibility $0.8$; a measured value $0.4$ would imply $|g^{(1)}|=0.5$ under these assumptions. Orthogonal linear polarizations, background light, unresolved interference fringes or vibrations can reduce measured contrast further. One absent arm gives zero contrast and makes the normalized two-sample correlation undefined.

For two identical mixers $U=R_x(\beta )$ with a lower-arm phase shifter $P(\varphi )=\mathrm{diag}(1,e^{i\varphi })$, the upper-input state evolves asThe upper-output interferometric visibility is ${\sin }^2\beta /(1+{\cos }^2\beta )$ and reaches one exactly at $\beta =\pi /2(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$. Replacing the second mixer by its inverse changes the port convention and phase dependence; it is a different specified network.

Wave interference is the reinforcement or cancellation that occurs when overlapping wave amplitudes add by the superposition principle. For two monochromatic waves of the same frequency, mutual optical coherence means that their relative wave phase is stable during the observation. Equal wave phases give constructive interference; a half-cycle phase difference gives the destructive interference intensity minimum. Wave amplitudes add before their squares determine wave intensity. ^[ref].

Consider two overlapping beams in a homogeneous medium, with the same polarization of an electromagnetic wave and individual local time-averaged light intensities $I_1,I_2$. Their phase difference $\delta$ is measured in radians. In the scalar detection convention, the combined local time-averaged wave intensity isThe last term records wave interference; adding $I_1+I_2$ alone misses it. The formula describes irradiance when both fields propagate along the same direction, or when the same detector geometry factor is included in all three intensities. For crossing beams it describes the squared electric field response, proportional to scalar wave intensity; a specified component of the Poynting vector also requires the propagation geometry. The ideal crossing plane waves below make that distinction explicit.

For equal individual light intensities $I_1=I_2=I_0>0$, the cosine half-angle identity givesThe constructive interference intensity is $4I_0$ at $\delta =0$ modulo $2\pi$, and the destructive interference intensity is zero at $\delta =\pi$ modulo $2\pi$. At phase quadrature, $\delta =\pi /2$, it is $2I_0$. With $I_1=1$ and $I_2=0.25$ in the same arbitrary wave intensity unit, the maximum is $2.25$, the minimum is $0.25$, and the phase quadrature value is $1.25$: unequal wave amplitudes cannot cancel completely.

Both curves use the same wave intensity unit and a horizontal angle in radians. The dashed levels are the averages over a full phase difference cycle. Equal beams have interferometric visibility one; the unequal example has interferometric visibility $0.8$.

A spatially varying phase difference turns the same law into interference fringes. Take two ideal plane electromagnetic waves with common wavelength $\lambda$, equal individual light intensities $I_0$, and propagation directions at angles $+\theta$ and $-\theta$ from the $z$ axis in the $xz$ plane, with $0<\theta <\pi /2$. Both have linear polarization along $y$, perpendicular to both propagation directions. Choose equal initial wave phases; their wavevectors and phase difference areHere $k$ is the wavenumber and $\omega$ the angular frequency. The common $z$ and time terms cancel, so the interference fringes stay at fixed $x$ for every $z$. Their interference fringe spacing isSet the length unit to $\lambda$, so that $\lambda =1$, and take $\theta =30^{\circ }=\pi /6$: then $\Lambda =1$. The constructive interference intensity bands lie at integer $x/\lambda$; the destructive interference intensity bands lie at half-integer $x/\lambda$.

The grid covers $-3\le x/\lambda \le 3$ and $0\le z/\lambda \le 4$; both axes are dimensionless lengths in wavelength units. The colour scale is $I/I_0$ from zero to four, using the same single-beam normalization as the equal-beam curve above. This is an ideal plane wave superposition, with no slits or point sources and no near-field approximation. For these $y$-polarized plane electromagnetic waves in vacuum, the longitudinal time-averaged Poynting vector obeys $⟨S_z⟩=I\cos \theta$; the plotted scalar $I$ therefore differs from the irradiance through a plane normal to $z$ by that common factor. This relation follows by adding the magnetic fields as well as the electric fields.

The bright peaks do not create energy. Averaging over one interference fringe spacing, or equivalently over one full phase difference cycle, givesbecause the integral of the cosine is zero, with sine as its antiderivative. Equal beams thus average to $2I_0$, despite bright bands at $4I_0$. For the crossing-wave geometry, the average longitudinal energy flux is correspondingly $2I_0\cos \theta$. Bright and dark regions redistribute the incoming energy; conservation of energy concerns the full energy flux, rather than the height of one peak.

Wave interference is useful because phase differences convert small changes in optical path length into measurable changes of wave intensity, as in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Its beauty is that the same superposition principle produces both complete cancellation and fourfold brightening; adding more coherent contributions also produces the narrow peaks of a diffraction grating. Feynman's treatment connects this many-source pattern directly to addition of complex amplitudes. ^[ref].

A short proof outline uses local real fields $E_j(t)=A_j\cos (\omega t+{\varphi }_j)$ with parallel linear polarizations. Write $I=C⟨(E_1+E_2{)}^2{⟩}_t$ and $I_j=C{A}_j^2/2$ for the same positive conversion factor $C$. Averaging over many wave periods while the phase difference stays fixed uses $⟨{\cos }^2(\omega t+{\varphi }_j){⟩}_t=1/2$ and $⟨\cos (\omega t+{\varphi }_1)\cos (\omega t+{\varphi }_2){⟩}_t=\cos \delta /2$, giving the stated law. Equivalently, add the complex amplitudes and take the squared complex modulus. ^[ref].

For different fixed linear polarizations in a common transverse plane, the cross term acquires the dot product of their real unit vectors, equal to $\cos \alpha$ for relative angle $\alpha$. Orthogonal linear polarizations remove the cross term in polarization-insensitive scalar detection; different orientations generally only reduce it. A common polarizer can select overlapping components and recover wave interference. Likewise, rapid random variation of the phase difference removes the observed cross term only when the detector's time average has $⟨e^{i\delta (t)}{⟩}_t=0$. Slowly varying wave phases can instead move resolved interference fringes, and biased or incompletely sampled wave phases can leave residual contrast. Finite optical coherence therefore depends on the observation time as well as the fields.

For $N$ equally intense spectral lines at ${\omega }_n={\omega }_0+n\Delta \omega$, sum their delayed self-correlations as a geometric series. The result isThe interferometric visibility revives every $T=2\pi /\Delta \omega$. There are $N-1$ zeros between adjacent revivals, at $\tau =jT/N$ for $j=1,\dots ,N-1$. The removable singularity at a revival has unit modulus. Revival spacing fixes line spacing; the internal zero count fixes $N$ under the equal-intensity model. The interferogram alone does not establish a fixed relative phase between the source lines or prove the emission is a coherent pulse train.

An angular diameter inferred from the interferometric visibility of an extended source. The displayed monochromatic formula is for a uniformly bright circular disk, with projected baseline $B$, diameter $\Theta$ and wavelength $\lambda$. Its first visibility zero gives $B\Theta /\lambda \simeq 1.22$. Stellar angular diameter from a visibility envelope describes this calibration; real photospheres require limb-darkening corrections.

Interferometric visibility measures the contrast of a scanned interference fringe. For the mutually coherent, equally polarized two-beam model in wave interference, with fixed individual wave intensities and $I_1+I_2>0$, the constructive interference intensity and destructive interference intensity giveEqual nonzero wave intensities give $\mathcal{V}=1$; $I_1=1,I_2=0.25$ give $\mathcal{V}=0.8$. Unequal wave intensities can therefore reduce interferometric visibility even with perfect mutual optical coherence. Random phase differences or distinguishable wave polarizations can reduce it further; zero contrast alone does not identify the cause. Both intensities zero leave the ratio undefined.

For normalized paths with complex amplitudes $\alpha ,\beta$ and identical internal states, the output probability is $1/2+\mathrm{Re}({\alpha }^{\ast }\beta e^{i\theta })$, so $\mathcal{V}=2|\alpha \beta |$. A photon polarization fringe alone determines transverse quantum coherence but not the sign of the population difference.

// Target: optics.bigb

A Michelson interferometer divides light at a beam splitter, reflects the two arms at mirrors and recombines the returning fields. For vacuum arm lengths ${\ell }_1,{\ell }_2$, the delay magnitude is $|\tau |=2|{\ell }_2-{\ell }_1|/c$. At each coarse delay, a small mirror scan produces maxima and minima of the detected light intensity. A photodiode and its electrical readout resolve these changes; the scan should cover several carrier cycles while changing $|g^{(1)}|$ negligibly. MIT's laboratory guide uses a mirror actuator, photodiode and electrical drive to scan interference fringes and extract interferometric visibility.^[ref]

A verified motivating experiment is Shaoul Ezekiel's MIT demonstration of source-spectrum control. A polarizer selects one or several lines from a laser whose adjacent lines have orthogonal linear polarizations. A sampled beam goes to a scanning Fabry–Pérot interferometer to check the optical spectrum; the main beam enters a Michelson interferometer, and a lens projects its interference fringes onto a screen. With one selected line the fringes retain good contrast through the demonstrated delay range. With several lines their contrast falls and returns as the arm length changes. At a fixed delay with poor contrast, selecting one line restores it; at matched arms both selections give good contrast. This control isolates the role of spectral composition rather than simply the arm position. The presentation is a qualitative demonstration, not a calibrated linewidth measurement. ^[ref].

A deliberately simpler two-line model explains the return of contrast. Take two stationary, mutually uncorrelated monochromatic contributions of equal power at ${\nu }_0\pm \delta \nu /2$. Their normalized wave-field correlation isfor equal detected single-arm light intensities. At $\tau =1/(2\delta \nu )$ the two contributions' interference fringes cancel on averaging; at $\tau =1/\delta \nu$ they agree again. This is a deduction from the stipulated spectrum, not a fit to Ezekiel's two- or three-line source. Finite individual linewidths eventually damp these revivals.

For a quantitative version of the experiment, the visibility law suggests explicit controls. Measure each arm separately at every coarse delay, subtract the detector's dark signal and any measured background, then normalize by $2\sqrt{I_1{I}_2}/(I_1+I_2)$. Keep the returning beams aligned on the same detector region with parallel linear polarizations; keep detector gain fixed and avoid saturation. Resolve the small mirror scan electrically, rather than averaging over its moving interference fringes. Repeat scans to identify vibration or drift. These controls follow from the averaging and mode-matching assumptions in first-order optical coherence; loss of contrast alone cannot distinguish source decorrelation from apparatus motion, misalignment or insufficient spatial resolution. The finite travel range gives access only to a finite range of delays.

The practical gain is that wave interference measures field correlations even when the detector cannot follow the optical oscillation itself. A long optical coherence length allows unequal-arm measurements; a short one localizes high contrast near matched delays. The beautiful feature is that both fading and reappearance of interference fringes are sums of the same rotating complex amplitudes.

An optical path length measures how much propagation wave phase a path accumulates, expressed as the distance that would accumulate the same wave phase in vacuum. A centimetre in a uniform medium with refractive index $3/2$ has optical path length $1.5\mathrm{cm}$, although its geometric length remains $1\mathrm{cm}$. This makes optical path length useful whenever two contributions must arrive with matching wave phases, from an optical lens to a Michelson interferometer. ^[ref]

For a specified path $\gamma$ at fixed angular frequency $\omega$, the optical path length is the line integralHere $s$ is geometric arc length, and $n$ is the phase refractive index, evaluated at the same frequency everywhere. The propagation interpretation assumes a stationary linear medium with isotropy, a real positive scalar refractive index and negligible loss, on a valid geometrical optics branch. The path can curve; at sharp interfaces apply the appropriate matching conditions to each segment. A prescribed curve has a mathematical line integral, but it predicts a propagation wave phase only when it represents the physical branch. ^[ref] Optical fibers can require a mode wavenumber rather than the bulk refractive index along a guessed light ray. ^[ref]

Fix the vacuum wavelength ${\lambda }_0=c/f=2\pi c/\omega$, with frequency $f=\omega /(2\pi )$ and vacuum wavenumber $k_0=2\pi /{\lambda }_0$. In a locally uniform medium the wavelength is $\lambda ={\lambda }_0/n$, while the frequency stays unchanged at a stationary interface. With the convention $\Phi =k_{0}S-\omega t+{\varphi }_0$, propagation from a specified starting wave phase contributesThe relative reference ${\delta }_{\mathrm{ref}}$ includes launch wave phases and any extra wave phase from mirrors, beam splitters or coatings. Thus $k_0\mathrm{OPL}$ is a propagation contribution, not an absolute detector wave phase independent of the apparatus. If the reference contributions stay fixed, a change in optical path difference $h$ changes the phase difference by $2\pi h/{\lambda }_0$. Using the material wavelength again in this formula would count the refractive index twice. ^[ref]

A motivating measurement turns invisible optical oscillations into a slowly changing electrical signal. MIT's teaching experiment uses a laser, a beam splitter, two returning mirrors, an amplified photodiode, an oscilloscope and a calibrated mirror actuator driven by a function generator. The returning beams overlap on the photodiode; one channel records detector voltage and another the actuator drive. The measured observable is the changing light intensity, including its maxima and minima, rather than direct timing of an optical cycle. A calibrated displacement per drive voltage and the spacing of the extrema relate geometric motion to the phase difference. The guide infers the laser wavelength from known actuator calibration; conversely, with independently known vacuum wavelength and ambient refractive index, the same relation calibrates mirror motion. These two unknowns cannot both be inferred from fringe spacing alone. ^[ref]

For a proposed change-of-medium measurement, keep the mirrors fixed and put a transparent cell of internal length $L$ in one arm. Compare its contents at refractive indices $n_a$ and $n_b$, leaving its windows in place. At normal incidence the two traversals giveHere $N$ is the signed number of whole interference fringe cycles plus any resolved fractional cycle, counted continuously. A mirror displacement $x$ instead gives $\Delta \mathrm{OPL}=2n_{\mathrm{amb}}x$; distinguish this double-pass factor from a single pass in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. OpenStax's gas-cell worked example provides the same double-pass reasoning; it is a teaching calculation rather than a published measurement dataset.^[ref]

An exact toy calculation makes the sensitivity visible. Stipulate ${\lambda }_0=600\mathrm{nm}$, $L=10\mathrm{mm}$ and $n_b-n_a=3/100000=0.00003$. Then $\Delta \mathrm{OPL}=600\mathrm{nm}$ and $\Delta \delta =2\pi$: a full interference fringe cycle, despite unchanged geometric lengths. For a continuous change $n_b-n_a=q(3/100000)$, let $0\le q\le 2$ and choose the initial detector phase difference to be zero. Equal coherent detected arm contributions of light intensity $I_0$ predictThe plot is this stipulated model: $q=1/2$ gives a minimum, $q=1$ restores a maximum, and the reference level is chosen by adjustment of the apparatus. It contains no measured values or assigned properties of a real gas. The equivalent mirror travel in vacuum is $300\mathrm{nm}$ per cycle. A single endpoint light intensity cannot distinguish $q=0$ from $q=1$; the continuous fringe count carries the missing information.

For an interpretable cell measurement, establish the initial phase difference with a small calibrated mirror scan, then track slow changes through successive interference fringes. Measure the dark signal and each arm separately, keep photodiode gain within its linear range, align both beams on the same region and match their linear polarizations. Monitor interferometric visibility and keep arm delays within the useful optical coherence time. Record cell length, contents, pressure and temperature; return to the starting condition to check drift. Changes in window deformation, cell length, external air or mirror position also change optical path length, so a reference cell or an independently monitored mechanical path is needed to isolate the contents' refractive index. These controls are deductions from the model, not a claim that the illustrated apparatus was operated. Loss of fringe count leaves a whole-cycle ambiguity; at an intensity extremum the first derivative with respect to phase difference vanishes, so a scan around phase quadrature is more sensitive to small changes. Broadband illumination, unstable optical coherence, vibration and strong loss can invalidate a simple one-frequency inference.

Place the two slits at transverse coordinates $+h/2$ and $-h/2$. Let the source point have coordinate $s$ and the observation point coordinate $x$, both measured in the same transverse direction. The total lower-slit path minus upper-slit path isThe last line uses the paraxial approximation at both source and screen. The source assumptions give $w,h\ll R$; the screen expression also assumes $h,|x|\ll D$. Reversing the source-coordinate orientation would change the sign of $s/R$, without changing the uniform-source result.

At the slits, the differential path delay from a source element is $hs/R$. Across the full filament its range is $hw/R$. Keeping all these phases nearly equal therefore requiresThis is a sufficient near-unit-spatial coherence condition, rather than a necessary condition for any observable interference. That distinction follows quantitatively below.

Different small elements of a thermal filament are mutually incoherent, so their wave intensities add. The two paths from one element are coherent. If that element supplies the same intensity $I_{0}B(s)ds$ through each slit, the superposition principle giveswhereIntegrating intensities over the incoherent source givesAdding complex amplitudes across different source elements instead would incorrectly assume mutual optical coherence of the entire filament.

For $B(s)=1/w$, define $\alpha =2\pi h/(\lambda D)$ and $\beta =\pi h/(\lambda R)$. The source's signed quantity isThusThe continuous limit at $\beta w=0$ uses $\sin z/z\to 1$.

The printed $V$ is a signed local modulation, not the usual fringe visibility. From the maximum and minimum of this scanned fringe pattern, the interferometric visibility isIt is independent of the screen's fringe phase and is nonnegative. For a concrete distinction, take $\beta w=\pi /2$ and $\alpha x=\pi /2$: the printed $V$ is zero at that observation point, while the pattern has contrast $\mathcal{V}=2/\pi$. The same example has $hw/R=\lambda /2$, which is not much smaller than $\lambda$, yet substantial interference survives. When the signed coherence factor is negative, bright and dark fringe positions interchange; the contrast remains its absolute value. This is the distinction between signed coherence and fringe visibility.

Put the plate behind the slit at transverse coordinate $+d/2$, and let positive screen coordinate $x$ point toward that slit. The extra optical path length isIn the paraxial approximation, the covered path minus the uncovered path has total optical path difference $\Delta -dx/L$. Its zero determines the shifted central interference fringe:toward the slit covered by the plate. Moving toward that slit shortens its geometric path and compensates the extra delay in the plate.

More generally, the phase difference is $(2\pi /\lambda )(\Delta -dx/L)$, so every interference fringe translates by the same $x_0$ in this approximation. The spacing $\lambda L/d$ is unchanged, and the shift corresponds to $\Delta /\lambda$ fringe periods. For an ideal uniform transparent plate that changes only the wave phase, the envelope and interferometric visibility are unchanged. Reflection losses or unequal transmission through a real plate could additionally reduce the interferometric visibility; those are separate amplitude effects. No numerical wavelength is needed for the physical displacement of the zero-order fringe.

Write $R_z(\theta )=e^{-i\theta Z/2}$ and $R_x(\theta )=e^{-i\theta X/2}$, using the Pauli operators. The Hadamard gate obeys $HZH=X$, so unitary conjugation of the matrix exponential gives $H{R}_z(\beta )H=R_x(\beta )$. Therefore the symmetric z-x-z beam splitter factorization isThe rightmost operator acts first. Each factor is unitary, which also proves the given matrix is unitary. Choosinggives $U_{\mathrm{BS}}=-iH$, so it is exactly a Hadamard gate up to global phase.

For the specified identical splitters with $\alpha =0$, put $c=\cos (\beta /2)$ and $s=\sin (\beta /2)$. Here $U_{\mathrm{BS}}=R_x(\beta )$, and direct multiplication givesThus the upper-port probability iswith $P_1={\sin }^2\beta {\cos }^2(\varphi /2)$. These identical beam splitters in a two-path interferometer give a nonconstant interference fringe whenever $\sin \beta \ne 0$. With this matrix and port convention, two identical balanced splitters swap the bright and dark ports relative to the two-Hadamard model: at $\varphi =0$, $R_x(\pi /2{)}^2=-iX$. The reflection phases must remain in the calculation.

The upper-port maximum and minimum are $1$ and ${\cos }^2\beta$. Hence the peak-to-peak modulation is ${\sin }^2\beta$ and its normalized interferometric visibility isBoth measures of contrast are maximal precisely forThese are balanced beam splitters, with equal single-input transmission and reflection probabilities. When $\beta \in \pi \mathbb{Z}$, only one route contributes to the output and the fringes disappear.

Temporal coherence measures correlation between an optical field and a delayed copy. For a stationary scalar complex field with carrier convention $e^{-i\omega t}$,The power spectrum $S(\omega )\ge 0$ and the field autocorrelation form a Fourier transform pair, the Wiener-Khinchin theorem:A Michelson interferometer supplies delay $\tau =\Delta L/c$. With equal arm intensities and matched polarization, its interferometric visibility is $|g^{(1)}(\tau )|$; unequal intensities or mode mismatch lower visibility independently of temporal coherence. The relevant spectrum is the optical field spectrum, not the low-frequency spectrum of detector intensity fluctuations.

For a single Lorentzian optical line of angular-frequency full width at half maximum $\Delta \omega$, use the narrow-line detuning modelSuch a model describes a phase-diffusing monochromatic source. An $e^{-1}$ correlation time is $2/\Delta \omega$, and its coherence length is $2c/\Delta \omega$. The Lorentzian extension over all detunings approximates a narrow optical line with $\Delta \omega \ll {\omega }_0$.

For two equal, mutually incoherent ideal monochromatic spectral lines,Here $\bar{\omega }=({\omega }_1+{\omega }_2)/2$ and $\Delta {\omega }_{12}={\omega }_2-{\omega }_1$. Visibility has zeros and revivals, so the overall spectral span alone does not determine a unique decay time. Giving each line a common finite Lorentzian linewidth multiplies this beating correlation by the corresponding exponential envelope.

These two examples distinguish irreversible envelope decay from cancellation and revival of discrete spectral components. The line profiles are explicit models, not claimed measurements of a particular source.

Let $I_0$ be the intensity from either fibre alone at the observation point, assuming equal output intensities, matching polarizations and negligible drift. The screen samples the relative phase $\Phi (X)$ between the two outputs. For an ideal monochromatic laser, first-order optical coherence is complete andThe interference fringes are approximately equally spaced in the small-angle far field, with a slowly varying diffraction envelope. If the output separation is $a$ and the screen distance is $D$, the interference fringe spacing is approximately ${\lambda }_{0}D/a$. Equal phases at the two input ends do not ensure a central bright fringe: the extra fibre contributes carrier phase $2\pi n_{\mathrm{eff}}(l_2-l_1)/{\lambda }_0$ in addition to the free-space optical path difference.

For a finite linewidth, the time-averaged interference signal becomesHere $g^{(1)}$ may be defined for the slowly varying field envelope, with the carrier phase already included in $\Phi$. A realistic laser therefore gives reduced interferometric visibility; for $V=1/2$, its extrema are $I_0$ and $3I_0$.

For a Lorentzian line shape of frequency full width at half maximum $\Delta \nu$, temporal optical coherence givesThe relevant index is the group index. Using the intended nondispersive approximation $n_g\simeq n_{\mathrm{eff}}=2$,This delayed-fibre linewidth measurement assumes the loss of contrast comes from linewidth. Unequal output intensities, polarization mismatch or mechanical phase fluctuations also lower interferometric visibility. If dispersion matters, the stated phase index alone does not specify the necessary group index.

The five tasks below concern a scanned Michelson interferometer. The original dashed curves are labelled visibility in arbitrary units; divide them by their maximum to obtain normalized interferometric visibility, which lies between zero and one.

Convert the distances to SI units: $r=1.5\times 10^{11}\mathrm{m}$ and $D=1.4\times 10^9\mathrm{m}$. The angular solar diameter isTwo receivers separated by a transverse baseline $b$ see a spread of relative wave phases of order $2\pi b\Theta /\lambda$. Averaging over incoherent source directions therefore reduces interferometric visibility when $b$ reaches the transverse optical coherence length scale $\lambda /\Theta$. At $\lambda =500\mathrm{nm}$,If “coherence length” specifically means the first zero of uniform-disk stellar visibility, a uniformly bright circular solar disk gives $g^{(1)}(b)=2J_1(x)/x$, with $x=\pi b\Theta /\lambda$. The first zero then lies at $\boxed{b_0=1.21967\lambda /\Theta \simeq 65\mu \mathrm{m}}$. This more specific number assumes a uniform disk and a first-zero criterion; the characteristic estimate is approximately $50$–$60\mu \mathrm{m}$. Solar brightness variation across the disk changes the exact contrast curve.