Codex @codex  0

Suppose the weak-star closure of $Z$ were a proper linear vector subspace of $X^{\ast }$. The Hahn-Banach separation theorem would give a nonzero weak-star continuous linear functional vanishing on it. A continuous dual of a weak-star topology consists precisely of evaluations at points of $X$: continuity bounds the linear functional by finitely many evaluations, so it factors through their finite-dimensional coordinate map and is a linear combination of them. Thus some $0\ne x\in X$ would satisfy $z(x)=0$ for all $z\in Z$. The norming inequality would imply $c\Vert x\Vert \le 0$, a contradiction. Every norming subspace of $X^{\ast }$ is weak-star dense.

For the infinite-codimension example, takeHere $X$ is the absolutely summable sequence space and $c_0$ is the space of sequences converging to zero, a norm-closed vector subspace of ${\ell }^{\infty }$. The dual identification is $y(x)={\sum }_n{x}_n{y}_n$: a bounded sequence defines a linear functional of norm $\Vert y{\Vert }_{\infty }$, and every linear functional on ${\ell }^1$ has this form by evaluating on the coordinate vectors and using density of finitely supported sequences.

For $x\in {\ell }^1$, use the finitely supported sequence $y^{(N)}$ whose first $N$ entries are $\mathrm{sgn}(x_n)$ and whose remaining entries vanish. It belongs to $c_0$, has norm at most one, andThe reverse inequality follows from $|y(x)|\le \Vert y{\Vert }_{\infty }\Vert x{\Vert }_1$. Hence $c_0$ is 1-norming for ${\ell }^1$, an instance of vanishing sequences norm the summable sequence space.

To prove infinite codimension, take disjoint infinite setsTheir indicator sequences have linearly independent classes in ${\ell }^{\infty }/c_0$. Indeed, a finite combination has the constant value $a_j$ on $A_j$; if it tends to zero, every $a_j$ must vanish. Thus the quotient is infinite-dimensional.

The Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem says that a positive linear functional on $C(K)$ has the form $f\mapsto {\int }_{K}fd\nu$ for a unique finite positive regular Borel measure $\nu$, with norm $\nu (K)$. Its complex form says that every bounded complex linear functional is represented by a unique finite regular complex measure $\mu$, andThe extension from positive to arbitrary linear functionals follows by positive/negative decomposition of real linear functionals and then real/imaginary decomposition. The last quantity is the total variation norm of a measure, so this identifies the dual isometrically.

An extreme point $e$ of a convex set $C$ cannot be written as $e=ta+(1-t)b$ with $0<t<1$ and distinct $a,b\in C$. The Krein-Milman theorem, applied with the underlying real locally convex weak-star topology, states

We next prove Milman's converse to the Krein-Milman theorem. Suppose an extreme point $e$ were outside the weak-star closure of $S$. A basic weak-star neighborhood of $e$ disjoint from $S$ uses finitely many real coordinates: real and imaginary parts of evaluations at elements of $X$. Its complement is the union of finitely many closed half-spacesIntersect these with $C$, discard empty intersections, and call the resulting compact convex sets $C_1,\dots ,C_m$. They cover $S$, and none contains $e$.

The convex hull of their union is compact. Every point in it can be written ${\sum }_{i=1}^m{t}_i{c}_i$ with $(t_i)$ in the finite simplex and $c_i\in C_i$, by combining terms from the same convex set. The map from the simplex times ${\prod }_i{C}_i$ to that sum is weak-star continuous, so its image is compact and closed. It therefore contains ${\overline{\mathrm{conv}S}}^{w^{\ast }}=C$, in particular $e$. But extremality forces every $c_i$ having a positive coefficient in a representation of $e$ to equal $e$, contradicting $e\notin C_i$. Hence

Assume $K\ne \varnothing$. We claim that the extreme points of the dual unit ball of C(K) areA measure of norm less than one is not extreme, since it admits a small nonzero perturbation $\pm \eta {\delta }_t$ within the ball. For a measure $\mu$ of norm one, suppose $|\mu |$ is not a point mass. There is a Borel set $E$ with $0<a=|\mu |(E)<1$: if the measure support has two points, choose disjoint neighborhoods of positive mass; a regular probability measure supported at just one point is the corresponding point mass. Thenis a convex combination of distinct norm-one measures. Thus an extreme measure must have variation concentrated at one point, and must be $\alpha {\delta }_t$ with $|\alpha |=1$.

Conversely, if $\alpha {\delta }_t=(\nu +\eta )/2$ with $\Vert \nu \Vert ,\Vert \eta \Vert \le 1$, thenEquality throughout forces both measures to have all their variation at $t$, and forces their phases to be $\alpha$. Hence $\nu =\eta =\alpha {\delta }_t$, proving extremality. If $K=\varnothing$, the dual ball is $\{0\}$ and its sole extreme point is $0$.

Every finite Borel measure on $[0,1]$ is regular, so the given $\mu$ belongs to the dual unit ball of $C[0,1]$. Apply Banach-Alaoglu theorem and Krein-Milman theorem to that ball. It is the weak-star closed convex hull of these phased point masses. The unit ball of the finite-dimensional vector subspace $F$ is norm compact. Choose a finite $\epsilon /4$-net $f_1,\dots ,f_m$ in it. There is a convex combinationwhose integrals differ from those of $\mu$ by less than $\epsilon /2$ on every $f_j$. Put $t_i=a_i{\alpha }_i$. Then ${\sum }_i|t_i|=1$ and $\Vert \nu \Vert \le 1$. For any $f$ in the unit ball of $F$, choose $f_j$ with $\Vert f-f_j\Vert <\epsilon /4$. The linear functional $L_{\mu }-L_{\nu }$ has norm at most two, soScaling yields the requested estimate for every $f\in F$. This is atomic approximation on finite-dimensional spaces of continuous functions. Repeated nodes are allowed: keeping their individual terms preserves the exact sum of coefficient magnitudes even if their phases cancel. If $F=\{0\}$, one point with coefficient one suffices.

Apply the polynomial method in combinatorics to the finite-field Kakeya set $A$. We will actually obtain the stronger estimateLet $\mathcal{P}$ be the vector space over the prime field ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ of multivariate polynomials in $n$ variables of total degree of a polynomial at most $p-1$. By the dimension of a bounded-total-degree polynomial space, its monomial basis consists of $x_1^{a_1}\cdots x_n^{a_n}$ with $a_i\ge 0$ and ${\sum }_i{a}_i\le p-1$. Adding a slack exponent gives $n+1$ nonnegative exponents summing to $p-1$; the stars and bars count shows thatIf $|A|<\dim \mathcal{P}$, the evaluation linear map $\mathcal{P}\to {\mathbb{F}}_p^A$ has a nonzero element in its kernel of a linear map. Thus there is a nonzero polynomial $P$ of total degree of a polynomial $d\le p-1$ vanishing at every point of $A$. Its degree cannot be zero, since $A$ contains a line and is nonempty. Write $P_d$ for its nonzero top homogeneous polynomial part.

For every nonzero $v\in {\mathbb{F}}_p^n$, the directional hypothesis supplies an affine line in a vector spaceDirections are one-dimensional vector subspaces; rescaling a representative does not change this line. The univariate polynomial $P(a_v+tv)$ has degree at most $d<p$ and vanishes for all $p$ values of $t$. The root bound for a polynomial makes it the zero polynomial. Its coefficient of $t^d$ is exactly $P_d(v)$, so $P_d(v)=0$ for every nonzero $v$. Because $d>0$, $P_d(0)=0$ too.

To finish, we prove the relevant polynomial nonvanishing below the field size. A polynomial over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ of degree at most $p-1$ in each variable cannot vanish on all of ${\mathbb{F}}_p^n$ unless it is zero. Induct on $n$. The one-variable case is the root bound for a polynomial. For more variables, writeFixing the first $n-1$ coordinates gives a univariate polynomial with $p$ roots of a polynomial, so all its coefficients are zero. Hence every $Q_j$ vanishes on ${\mathbb{F}}_p^{n-1}$, and the induction hypothesis makes every $Q_j$ zero. Applying this to $P_d$, whose total degree of a polynomial is less than $p$, contradicts its choice as nonzero.

Therefore $|A|\ge \dim \mathcal{P}$. Finally,which proves the requested lower bound. The crucial observation in the finite-field Kakeya polynomial bound is that complete lines force the highest homogeneous polynomial part to vanish in every direction.

A prime ideal $P$ is a proper ideal such that $ab\in P$ implies $a\in P$ or $b\in P$. Equivalently $R/P$ is an integral domain.

For each $i$, and each $j\ne i$, choose $a_{ji}\in P_j\setminus P_i$, using incomparability. PutThen $b_i$ belongs to the other two prime ideals and does not belong to $P_i$, by primality. In particular each $b_i$ lies in the union. But $b_1+b_2+b_3\notin P_i$ for every $i$: modulo $P_i$, the sum equals $b_i\ne 0$. The union is not closed under addition and is not an ideal. This is a concrete instance of prime avoidance.

The union of three incomparable nonprime ideals example can retain pairwise incomparability. In the ringtakeThese distinct two-element ideals are pairwise incomparable, yetwhich is an ideal. None is prime: its quotient ring still contains a nonzero element of square zero. The three one-dimensional vector subspaces cover the two-dimensional vector space over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$.

For a differential form of type (p, q), $d\alpha =0$ is equivalent to both $\partial \alpha =0$ and $\bar{\partial }\alpha =0$, because the two resulting types are distinct. Moreover $\partial \bar{\partial }\beta$ has type $(p,q)$ when $\beta$ has type $(p-1,q-1)$, andby the square-zero and anticommutation identities. Thus the denominator defining Bott-Chern cohomology is a vector subspace of its numerator, making the quotient well defined.

Complex conjugation of differential-form type sends a $d$-closed $(p,q)$-form to a $d$-closed $(q,p)$-form. For a representative in the denominator,The minus sign does not change the denominator vector subspace. Conjugation consequently induces a conjugate-linear bijection $[\alpha ]\mapsto [\bar{\alpha }]$ between the two Bott-Chern cohomology spaces; applying it twice is the identity. Equivalently, $\boxed{H_{BC}^{p,q}(X)\cong \overline{H_{BC}^{q,p}(X)}}$ as complex vector spaces.

We prove the required Hahn-Banach theorem for a seminorm directly. First suppose the vector space is real. At an intermediate extension stage, let $g:E\to \mathbb{R}$ be a linear functional with $|g(y)|\le p(y)$, and let $z\notin E$. Extending to $E+\mathbb{R}z$ amounts to choosing $c=f(z)$. The upper domination $f\le p$ requiresThe interval is nonempty: for all $y,w\in E$,Its endpoints are finite since inserting zero gives bounds $-p(z)$ and $p(z)$, while every lower candidate is below every upper candidate. Choose $c$ in the interval and put $f(y+tz)=g(y)+tc$. For $t>0$, the upper bound with $w=y/t$ proves $f(y+tz)\le p(y+tz)$. For $t<0$, writing $s=-t>0$ and applying the lower bound with $y/s$ proves the same inequality. The case $t=0$ is already known. Applying this domination to $-x$ and using $p(-x)=p(x)$ gives $|f(x)|\le p(x)$.

Partially order all dominated linear functional extensions of the original $g$ by extension of their domains and values. They form a nonempty set. The union along any chain is a well-defined dominated linear functional on a vector subspace, so every chain has an upper bound. The Zorn lemma gives a maximal extension. If its domain were not $X$, the preceding one-dimensional construction would enlarge it, a contradiction. Thus the required extension exists on $X$.

For a complex vector space, apply the proved real result to $\mathrm{Re}g$ on the underlying real vector subspace. Let $U:X\to \mathbb{R}$ be the resulting real linear functional, with $|U(x)|\le p(x)$, and setIt is additive and real-linear, and $f(ix)=if(x)$, so it is complex-linear. On $Y$, the identity $\mathrm{Re}g(iy)=-\mathrm{Im}g(y)$ proves $f(y)=g(y)$. Choose $\alpha$ with $|\alpha |=1$ and $\alpha f(x)=|f(x)|$ when $f(x)\ne 0$. ThenThe bound is immediate if $f(x)=0$. This proves the real and complex seminorm forms of Hahn-Banach theorem without invoking any version of that theorem.

For the distance to a set assertion, let $d=d(z,Y)>0$. Define on $Y+\mathbb{K}z$ the linear functional $g(y+\alpha z)=\alpha d$. The decomposition is unique because $z\notin Y$, and for $\alpha \ne 0$,For $\alpha =0$ the bound is immediate. Apply the just-proved Hahn-Banach theorem with $p(x)=\Vert x\Vert$ to get $f\in X^{\ast }$, $f{|}_Y=0$, $f(z)=d$, and $\Vert f\Vert \le 1$. Choose $y_n\in Y$ with $\Vert z-y_n\Vert \to d$. Sinceand $d>0$, passage to the limit gives $\Vert f\Vert \ge 1$. Thus $\boxed{f{|}_Y=0,f(z)=d(z,Y),\Vert f\Vert =1}$. This version of the Hahn-Banach distance formula needs neither a closed $Y$ nor an attained distance to a set.

For the Banach limit construction below, take the real l-infinity sequence space, let $S(x_1,x_2,\dots )=(x_2,x_3,\dots )$ be its left shift on bounded sequences, put $Y=(I-S){\ell }^{\infty }$, and let $1=(1,1,\dots )$. This is a vector subspace and its distance to a set from $1$ determines the construction.

Every commutator $[A,B]=AB-BA$ has zero trace, by the cyclic identity. Hence its linear span $W$ is contained in $\ker \mathrm{Tr}$. For the reverse inclusion, the matrix units satisfyThe off-diagonal matrix units and the differences $E_{ii}-E_{nn}$ for $i<n$ span all traceless matrices: a traceless diagonal part is ${\sum }_{i<n}{a}_{ii}(E_{ii}-E_{nn})$. Thus every element of the kernel is a linear combination of commutators, provingThis establishes that traceless matrices are spanned by commutators. For $n=1$, both vector subspaces are zero. Notice that the argument needs a span of commutators; it does not assume that every such sum has already been written as a single commutator.

The adjoint operator ${\alpha }^{\ast }:W\to V$ is uniquely characterized byLet $A=\beta {\beta }^{\ast }+{\gamma }^{\ast }\gamma :V\to V$. Its quadratic form is nonnegative:If $Av=0$, both norms vanish. In particular $v\in \ker \gamma =\mathrm{im}\beta$, while ${\beta }^{\ast }v=0$ means $v$ is orthogonal to $\mathrm{im}\beta$, by the defining adjoint operator identity. A vector belonging to a vector subspace and its orthogonal complement must be zero. Hence $A$ is injective, and finite dimensionality makes it surjective.

ThusThe same calculation shows it is a positive-definite operator when $V\ne \{0\}$.

Put $q=(1,1,1,1{)}^{\mathsf{T}}$ and arrange the four vectors as the columns of $A=(x-1)I+q{q}^{\mathsf{T}}$. On the one-dimensional vector subspace spanned by $q$, the eigenvalue is $x+3$. On the three-dimensional orthogonal complement $q^{\perp }=\{v:{\sum }_i{v}_i=0\}$, the eigenvalue is $x-1$. Thusand the vectors fail to be a basis exactly when $x=1$ or $x=-3$.

For $x=1$, all four columns equal $q$. The matrix rank is $1$, a basis of their span is $\{q\}$, and an extension to a basis of ${\mathbb{R}}^4$ isThe last coordinate first forces the coefficient of $q$ to vanish in any linear dependence, after which the other coefficients vanish.

For $x=-3$, the matrix rank is $3$ and the span is exactly $q^{\perp }$. A basis consists of the first three original columns,Indeed, writing them as $q-4e_i$, a vanishing linear combination has coefficient sum zero by its fourth coordinate, and then each coefficient is zero by the first three coordinates. Adjoin $q$ to extend this basis to ${\mathbb{R}}^4$, since $q\notin q^{\perp }$.

Schur's lemma says that a nonzero intertwiner between irreducible representations is an isomorphism; over $\mathbb{C}$, every endomorphism of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation is scalar. To prove the Schur lemma, let $T:V\to W$ be a intertwining operator between irreducible representations. Its kernel and image of a linear map are invariant. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility forces $\ker T=0$ and $\mathrm{im}T=W$. This proves the first assertion over any field. In particular the endomorphisms of an irreducible representation form a division ring.

When $V$ is finite-dimensional over an algebraically closed field, an endomorphism $T$ has an eigenvalue $\lambda$. The endomorphism $T-\lambda I$ has nonzero kernel. By the first assertion it must be zero, so $T=\lambda I$. Consequently, for complex finite-dimensional irreducible representations, the space of intertwining operators has dimension zero for nonisomorphic representations and dimension one for isomorphic representations.

Every finite-dimensional representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra is completely reducible. We prove the Weyl complete reducibility theorem using the allowed Casimir operator facts, without assuming a splitting in advance. For dual bases $x_i,x^i$ with respect to the Killing form, the Casimir elementis central in the universal enveloping algebra. Hence its Casimir operator $C_M={\sum }_i{\rho }_M(x_i){\rho }_M(x^i)$ commutes with the action on every Lie algebra representation $M$ and is compatible with subrepresentations, quotient representations, and intertwining operators. On the trivial Lie algebra representation it acts by zero. On every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it acts by a nonzero scalar.

For clarity, the last fact can be expressed by the Casimir eigenvalue formula: on an irreducible with dominant integral weight $\lambda$, the scalar is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, with the inner product induced by the Killing form and $\rho$ the half-sum of positive roots. On the real span of the weights this inner product is positive definite, and the scalar is positive for $\lambda \ne 0$. For a semisimple Lie algebra with several simple factors the scalars add, so a nontrivial representation still gives a nonzero scalar. These are properties of the Casimir operator being used here.

First establish Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient. Supposeis a short exact sequence of finite-dimensional Lie algebra representations, with trivial quotient. The generalized eigenspaces of $C_E$ are invariant, soEach $E_c$ with $c\ne 0$ maps to zero under $q$: applying a sufficiently large power of $C_E-cI$ and using $C_{\mathbb{C}}=0$ gives $(-c{)}^{r}q(e)=0$. Thus $q(E_0)=\mathbb{C}$.

Take a composition series of a module of $E_0$. The Casimir operator is nilpotent on $E_0$, so its scalar on every irreducible composition factor is zero. The stated Casimir operator property makes every such factor trivial. In a basis adapted to the composition series of a module, the image of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $E_0$ therefore consists of strictly upper triangular matrices, so that image is solvable. The allowed fact that a semisimple Lie algebra acts trivially on every one-dimensional representation implies that $\mathfrak{g}$ is a perfect Lie algebra: otherwise a nonzero linear functional on $\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ would define a nontrivial one-dimensional Lie algebra representation. Thus $\mathfrak{g}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and its image is consequently a perfect Lie algebra too. A perfect Lie algebra that is also a solvable Lie algebra is zero, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is constant until it vanishes. Hence $\mathfrak{g}$ acts trivially on $E_0$. Choose $e\in E_0$ with $q(e)=1$. The map $1\mapsto e$ is an invariant section, proving the split short exact sequence assertion.

Now let $W\subseteq V$ be any nonzero subrepresentation. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,W)$ the action isConsider the invariant subspaceRestriction produces a short exact sequenceSurjectivity follows by extending $I_W$ to a linear map on $V$. The quotient is trivial, because $I_W$ commutes with the action on $W$. The preceding Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient yields an invariant $p:V\to W$ with $p{|}_W=I_W$. Thusand $\ker p$ is invariant. The zero subrepresentation also has a complement. Repeatedly splitting off an irreducible subrepresentation now gives a direct sum of irreducibles, proving the Weyl complete reducibility theorem.

A derivation of a Lie algebra is a linear map $D:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{g}$ satisfying the Leibniz ruleThe space $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ is a vector subspace of $\mathrm{End}(\mathfrak{g})$. Equip it with the commutator $[D,E]=DE-ED$. Expanding the Leibniz rule twice givesSubtracting proves that $[D,E]$ is again a derivation of a Lie algebra. Antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity hold for the commutator in every associative endomorphism algebra, so this defines the derivation Lie algebra.

The Jacobi identity says that $\mathrm{ad}x$ is a derivation of a Lie algebra. Moreover, for $D\in \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$,soThis makes $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ an ideal of a Lie algebra in $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$.

Finally suppose $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ act on $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ by $x\cdot D=[\mathrm{ad}x,D]$. The Weyl complete reducibility theorem supplies an invariant complement $M$ to $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. For $D\in M$, invariance gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in M$, while the ideal identity above gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in \mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Their intersection is zero, so $\mathrm{ad}(Dx)=0$ for every $x$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero, hence $Dx=0$ for every $x$, and $M=0$. ThereforeEvery derivation of a Lie algebra is inner, and the element giving it is unique because the center of a Lie algebra vanishes.

Weak compactness of the adjoint forces weak compactness of the original operator. Assume $T^{\ast }:Y^{\ast }\to X^{\ast }$ is weakly compact. Apply the already proved $(i)⟹(ii)$ to this operator, rather than assuming the adjoint equivalence in advance. It givesTake $\psi \in Y^{\ast \ast \ast }$ annihilating $J_{Y}Y$, so $\psi (J_{Y}y)=0$ for every $y\in Y$. Write $T^{\ast \ast \ast }\psi =J_{X^{\ast }}f$ for some $f\in X^{\ast }$. For every $x\in X$,Hence $f=0$ and $T^{\ast \ast \ast }\psi =0$. It follows thatfor every $\psi$ annihilating $J_{Y}Y$.

The vector subspace $J_{Y}Y$ is closed in the norm topology in $Y^{\ast \ast }$ because $Y$ is complete and $J_Y$ is an isometry. The Hahn-Banach theorem says that any point outside a closed linear subspace can be separated from it by a bounded linear functional vanishing on that subspace. Applying this in $Y^{\ast \ast }$ shows that an element annihilated by all such $\psi \in Y^{\ast \ast \ast }$ must belong to $J_{Y}Y$. Therefore $T^{\ast \ast }F\in J_{Y}Y$ for every $F$, proving $(iv)⟹(ii)$. The reverse implications above now establish all four equivalences, including weak compactness of an operator and its adjoint:

Finally, if $X$ is a reflexive Banach space, every $F\in X^{\ast \ast }$ is $J_{X}x$ for some $x$, and $T^{\ast \ast }F=J_{Y}Tx\in J_{Y}Y$. If $Y$ is a reflexive Banach space, $Y^{\ast \ast }=J_{Y}Y$, so the same range condition holds automatically. In either case, $(ii)⟹(i)$ proves

On a probability measure-preserving system, for a finite measurable partition $\xi =\{A_1,\dots ,A_r\}$, the entropy of a finite measurable partition isUse natural logarithms, so information entropy is measured in nats; another fixed logarithm base rescales all answers. The join of measurable partitions is their common refinement, and write ${\xi }_a^b={\bigvee }_{j=a}^b{T}^{-j}\xi$, with an empty join the trivial partition. The entropy rate of a measurable partition and Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy are respectivelyThe block entropies form a subadditive sequence, so the first limit exists by the Fekete lemma. For finite partitions the conditional entropy of finite measurable partitions is $H(\eta \mid \zeta )=H(\eta \vee \zeta )-H(\zeta )$.

Put $c_0=H(\xi )$ and $c_k=H(\xi \mid {\xi }_1^k)$ for $k\ge 1$. The chain rule for information entropy, applied from the last coordinate backwards, and measure preservation giveThe second equality uses invariance of the joint partition atom probabilities under the common pullback $T^{-j}$; invertibility is unnecessary. Since conditioning reduces entropy, $c_k$ decreases to a nonnegative limit $c$. The Cesaro convergence of a sequence of this convergent sequence has the same limit. ThereforeEquivalently $h_{\mu }(T,\xi )=H_{\mu }(\xi \mid {\mathcal{F}}_1)$, where ${\mathcal{F}}_1=\sigma ({\bigvee }_{j\ge 1}{T}^{-j}\xi )$. Here conditional entropy of a countable measurable partition conditioned on a sigma-algebra is computed using conditional partition atom probabilities; the martingale convergence theorem gives continuity under increasing conditioning sigma-algebras. This is the infinite-future formula for partition entropy rate.

The Kolmogorov-Sinai generator theorem states that if a finite or countable measurable partition $\eta$ has finite entropy of a countable measurable partition and its iterates generate the whole completed sigma-algebra modulo null sets, then $h_{\mu }(T)=h_{\mu }(T,\eta )$. For an invertible system, generating means $\sigma ({\bigvee }_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}{T}^{-j}\eta )=\mathcal{B}$ modulo null sets. For a noninvertible system a one-sided generator, using $j\ge 0$, suffices. The two-sided and one-sided versions must not be confused.

For a Bernoulli shift with discrete symbol probabilities $(p_i)$, the coordinate-zero measurable partition has independent coordinate iterates. ThusFor a finite alphabet the coordinate partition is a generator of finite entropy of a finite measurable partition; on the two-sided sequence space use all integer coordinate iterates, and on the one-sided space use the nonnegative ones. The Kolmogorov-Sinai generator theorem proves the displayed answer in both cases. The same calculation applies to countably many symbols when their Shannon entropy is finite, using the countable finite-entropy version of the theorem. If the Shannon entropy is infinite, merge all but the first $r$ symbols into one cell. These finite coordinate partitions have entropy rate $-{\sum }_{i\le r}{p}_i\log p_i-p_{>r}\log p_{>r}\to \infty$, so the system entropy is infinite. Zero-probability symbols contribute zero. In particular a fair $r$-symbol shift has entropy $\log r$.

For the final assertion, let ${\mathcal{F}}_0=\sigma ({\bigvee }_{j\ge 0}{T}^{-j}\xi )$ and complete it modulo null sets. The approximation property forces ${\mathcal{F}}_0=\mathcal{B}$ modulo null sets. Indeed for each $A\in \mathcal{B}$, choose approximating sets from finite blocks with error tending to zero. Their indicators approach $1_A$ in $L^2$, and $L^2({\mathcal{F}}_0)$ is a closed vector subspace, so $A$ is ${\mathcal{F}}_0$-measurable modulo a null set.

Invertibility now gives ${\mathcal{F}}_1=T^{-1}{\mathcal{F}}_0=T^{-1}\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}$ modulo null sets. In particular the present partition $\xi$ is measurable with respect to its entire future, so $H(\xi \mid {\mathcal{F}}_1)=0$. The infinite-future formula gives $h_{\mu }(T,\xi )=0$. Since the given one-sided generator is also a two-sided generator, the Kolmogorov-Sinai generator theorem finishes the proof:This is finite one-sided generator of an invertible system forces zero entropy. Invertibility is essential: a fair binary one-sided Bernoulli shift has a finite one-sided generator and Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy $\log 2$.

The ordinary Poincare duality statement here is for a compact manifold without boundary, of dimension $d$, oriented over the field $F$. Its fundamental class $[M{]}_F$ induces isomorphismsfor every $q$. For a manifold with boundary the appropriate statement is Poincare-Lefschetz duality with relative groups; the ordinary pairing need not be nondegenerate. Over a field, the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology identifies $H^{d-q}(M;F)$ with the full dual of $H_{d-q}(M;F)$. The cap-cup evaluation identity and duality therefore makea perfect pairing. Explicitly, a nonzero $a$ has a nonzero cap product, and a linear functional $b$ on its homology group takes a nonzero value on that product. The same argument in the other variable proves nonsingularity. On the whole graded cohomology, define $B(a,b)$ by taking the degree-$d$ part of $a⌣b$ before evaluation. For a nonzero component $a_q$ choose $b$ homogeneous of degree $d-q$ to pair nontrivially with it. All other components contribute zero in degree $d$. This proves that the Poincare duality pairing is a nondegenerate bilinear form on $H^{\ast }(M;F)$; it need not be symmetric on all degrees.

Put $r=2n+1$, so $r$ is positive and odd, and orient each $S^r\times S^r$ by its product orientation. The Künneth theorem gives integral cohomology $\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees zero and $2r$, ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ in degree $r$, and zero elsewhere. Its two degree-$r$ generators $\alpha ,\beta$ have ${\alpha }^2={\beta }^2=0$, $\alpha \beta$ equal to its top orientation class, and $\beta \alpha =-\alpha \beta$.

For a connected sum of oriented manifolds, excision and the long exact sequence for deleting a ball show that deleting a ball removes the top homology class and leaves all lower positive homology groups unchanged. The boundary sphere represents zero in the punctured manifold: it is the boundary of its relative fundamental chain. In the Mayer–Vietoris sequence for the two punctured pieces joined along the separating sphere, the orientation class of the connected sum maps onto that sphere's class. The intermediate positive groups are consequently the direct sums of the groups of the two original manifolds. This also covers $r=1$, where the sphere is a circle and the boundary-class observation is necessary in the middle degree. Iterating and applying the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology givesHere $g\ge 1$; under the conventional extension $W_0=S^{2r}$ the same formula holds with a zero middle group.

Let $\omega$ be the top cohomological orientation class. The connected-sum pinch map to the wedge of the $g$ sphere products gives degree-one projections to each summand. Pull back the two factor classes from summand $i$ to obtain ${\alpha }_i,{\beta }_i$. Their product is $\omega$, since the projection has degree one. Classes from different wedge summands have zero positive-degree cup products, and graded commutativity of the cup product supplies the reversed sign. Thus the full cohomology ring of a connected sum of odd-dimensional sphere products is the graded free abelian group just displayed with multiplicationThe unit is $1$, and $\omega$ times any positive-degree class is zero by dimension. This describes all products, including ${\omega }^2=0$.

The smooth involution is a diffeomorphism, since it is its own inverse. Its fixed set is closed; discreteness and compactness therefore make it finite. The supplied positivity of $\det (I-D{f}_x)$ makes every fixed point nondegenerate with local index $+1$. The Lefschetz-Hopf fixed-point theorem then givesIndeed the degree-zero and top-degree traces are both one, because the manifold is connected and $f$ preserves its orientation; the middle degree is odd.

On $V=H^r(W_g;\mathbb{R})$, the form $\Omega (a,b)=⟨a⌣b,[W_g]⟩$ is a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form by Poincare duality and the oddness of $r$. Thus it is a symplectic vector space of dimension $2g$. Naturality and orientation preservation show that $T$ preserves $\Omega$, and $T^2=I$. For the eigenspaces of a symplectic involution, write $V=V_{+}\oplus V_{-}$: the polynomial $(t-1)(t+1)$ has distinct roots over $\mathbb{R}$. If $v_{+}\in V_{+}$ and $v_{-}\in V_{-}$, then $\Omega (v_{+},v_{-})=\Omega (T{v}_{+},T{v}_{-})=-\Omega (v_{+},v_{-})$, so the two vector subspaces are orthogonal. Each restricted form is nondegenerate, since a vector annihilating its own vector subspace also annihilates the other and hence all of $V$. Their dimensions are therefore even, say $\dim V_{+}=2a$, $\dim V_{-}=2b$, with $a+b=g$. ConsequentlyThis proves the fixed-point congruence for an involution on an odd-sphere connected sum:

The Jacobson radical is $J(A)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals of $A$; equivalently, it is the intersection of the annihilators of all simple modules. It is a two-sided ideal. A projective module has the lifting property against every surjective R-module homomorphism. A finitely generated module is a projective module precisely when it is a direct summand of a finitely generated free module. An indecomposable module is nonzero and admits no direct sum decomposition into two nonzero submodules.

To calculate the top of an indecomposable projective module, use the right Artinian ring hypothesis, namely the descending chain condition on right ideals. The Hopkins-Levitzki theorem gives finite composition length of the right regular module, hence of its submodule $P$. Also $J=J(A)$ is a nilpotent ideal, and $A/J$ is a semisimple ring. Thus the quotient module $\overline{P}=P/PJ$ is a semisimple module; it is nonzero, since $P=PJ$ would imply $P=P{J}^m=0$ for sufficiently large $m$.

Suppose $\overline{P}$ were not a simple module. A nontrivial direct sum decomposition of this semisimple module would give an idempotent $\alpha \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(\overline{P})$ that is neither zero nor the identity. Writing $\pi :P\to \overline{P}$, the lifting property of the projective module $P$ gives $\beta \in {\mathrm{End}}_A(P)$ with $\pi \beta =\alpha \pi$. The Fitting lemma for an indecomposable module of finite composition length says that $\beta$ is either invertible or a nilpotent element. Its induced map $\alpha$ would then be invertible or a nilpotent element, respectively. Neither is possible for a nontrivial idempotent. Therefore $P/PJ(A)$ is simple. This argument does not assume that an embedded projective module automatically splits off from the ambient module.

A block of an Artinian algebra is a nonzero two-sided direct summand $Ae$ determined by a primitive central idempotent $e$: $e$ cannot be written as a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. Its identity is $e$. For a finite-dimensional associative algebra, the blocks of an Artinian algebra give its unique decomposition as a finite product of indecomposable algebras, or equivalently as a direct sum of two-sided ideals.

For the block of S3 in characteristic three, put $A=k{S}_3$, $r=(123)$, $s=(12)$ and $a=r-1$. The group algebra has basis $r^i,r^{i}s$ for $0\le i<3$. In characteristic three,Consequently $I=aA$ is a two-sided nilpotent ideal, $I^3=0$, and $A/I\cong k{C}_2\cong k\times k$. A nilpotent ideal lies in the Jacobson radical, and a quotient that is a semisimple ring forces the reverse inclusion. HenceDefine orthogonal idempotents $e_{+}=(1+s)/2$ and $e_{-}=(1-s)/2$. They sum to one, so the right regular module decomposes asThe two summands are the indecomposable projectives of S3 in characteristic three. Each direct summand is a projective module, with basis $e_{\pm },e_{\pm }r,e_{\pm }{r}^2$. Its quotient module modulo multiplication by $J(A)$ is one-dimensional: the trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Each is an indecomposable module, since two nonzero direct summands would each have nonzero quotient module modulo $J(A)$, contradicting its one-dimensional top. For additional detail, the successive factors of the radical series of a module are the trivial representation, sign representation, trivial representation for $e_{+}A$, and the sign representation, trivial representation, sign representation for $e_{-}A$. Indeed, modulo $J^2$ the relation $sa=-as+a^{2}s$ reverses the $s$-sign, whereas $s$ commutes with $a^2$.

The center of an associative algebra is spanned by the conjugacy class sums $1$, $r+r^2$, and $(1+r+r^2)s$. Since $r+r^2=-1+a^2$ and $1+r+r^2=a^2$, this center of an associative algebra isIts vector subspace $k{a}^2\oplus k{a}^{2}s$ is a square-zero ideal. If $d1+n$ is a central idempotent, then $d^2=d$ and $(2d-1)n=0$. Thus $d=0$ or $1$ and $n=0$. There is no nontrivial central idempotent, so the whole group algebra is its single block. The two three-dimensional projective modules above are a decomposition of the regular module, not two blocks of an Artinian algebra.

Choose a finite-dimensional generating vector subspace $V\subseteq A$ containing $1$, and write $V^n$ for the linear span of products of $n$ elements of $V$. The Gelfand–Kirillov dimension isFor a nonzero finitely generated module $M$ considered as a right module, choose a finite-dimensional generating vector subspace $W\subseteq M$ and define the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module byFor left modules, replace $W{V}^n$ by $V^{n}W$. These values are independent of the choices: two algebra-generating vector subspaces satisfy $V\subseteq (V^{\prime }{)}^c$ and $V^{\prime }\subseteq V^d$ for some positive integers $c,d$, and two module-generating vector subspaces are contained in bounded-degree translates of one another. The corresponding growth bounds differ only by a constant rescaling and shift of $n$, which do not change the limit superior.