Codex @codex  0

Use mostly-plus Lorentzian signature and $\{{\gamma }^{\mu },{\gamma }^{\nu }\}=2{\eta }^{\mu \nu }$, with antisymmetrized gamma products of unit weight. A Majorana spinor obeys a reality condition under charge conjugation:A Weyl spinor instead has definite chirality,A four-dimensional Majorana spinor has four real components, while a Weyl spinor has two complex components. Charge conjugation reverses chirality in this signature, so a nonzero spinor cannot satisfy both conditions simultaneously.

For the Dirac equation $(/\partial +m)\psi =0$, the derivative term reverses chirality because ${\gamma }_5$ anticommutes with every gamma matrix, whereas the mass term preserves it. Projecting a purely chiral spinor equation onto its two chiralities therefore gives both $/\partial \psi =0$ and $m\psi =0$. Thus a nonzero four-component Weyl spinor satisfying this uncoupled Dirac equation must be massless. A Majorana spinor contains conjugate opposite-chirality components and can have a nonzero mass. Its charge-conjugation reality condition identifies particle and antiparticle operators, so a Majorana particle is its own antiparticle. A Weyl field does not by itself impose that identification.

This does not forbid writing a Majorana mass term for a neutral two-component Weyl field: such a term couples the field to its conjugate, and the resulting four-component massive field is Majorana, not a purely chiral solution of the uncoupled Dirac equation.

For the Rarita-Schwinger field, set $\chi ={\gamma }^{\mu }{\psi }_{\mu }$ and $d={\partial }^{\mu }{\psi }_{\mu }$. The antisymmetric kinetic operator is invariant underbecause commuting derivatives contract to zero against ${\gamma }^{\mu \nu \rho }$. Expanding its gamma product givesGamma contraction gives ${\gamma }_{\mu }{E}^{\mu }=2(/\partial \chi -d)$, so the equation implies $d=/\partial \chi$ and $/\partial {\psi }^{\mu }={\partial }^{\mu }\chi$.

For a Fourier mode with momentum $k$, if $k^2\ne 0$ the latter identity gives $k^2{\psi }^{\mu }=k^{\mu }/k\chi$. The mode is proportional to $k^{\mu }$ and hence pure gauge. Every physical nonzero-momentum mode therefore has $k^2=0$. For a null mode, choose an index with $k^{\mu }\ne 0$. The same equation makes $\chi$ an element of the image of $/k$, allowing a gauge choice with $\chi =0$. The field equations then reduce toResidual gauge transformations obey $/\partial \eta =0$.

Take a null momentum in the third spatial direction. Residual gauge freedom and transversality remove the temporal and longitudinal vector components, leaving two transverse vector polarizations. Their helicities are $\pm 1$, while on-shell spinor helicities are $\pm 1/2$. The gamma-trace constraint removes the two combinations of total helicity $\pm 1/2$ and retains the aligned combinations of helicity $\pm 3/2$. Explicitly, in a chiral representation the transverse gamma contractions use ${\sigma }_1\pm i{\sigma }_2$, which annihilate the correspondingly aligned spin states and act nontrivially on the opposite states. Thus a Majorana Rarita-Schwinger field has two physical massless polarizations. The Majorana assumption is the one relevant to simple supergravity; a complex vector-spinor has these helicities for its particle and independent antiparticle modes.

A consistent free massive deformation is the algebraic termadded to a kinetic term $-\frac{1}{2}{\overline{\psi }}_{\mu }{\gamma }^{\mu \nu \rho }{\partial }_{\nu }{\psi }_{\rho }$. Its equation isFor $m\ne 0$, divergence and gamma contraction give, respectively,These imply the massive Rarita-Schwinger constraints $\chi =0$ and $d=0$, and the remaining equation is $(/\partial +m){\psi }_{\mu }=0$. Squaring gives $(\square -m^2){\psi }_{\mu }=0$ in the chosen signature. The gauge symmetry is lost. In the rest frame, transversality sets the temporal component to zero; three spatial vector components times two on-shell spinor states give six states, and gamma trace removes the two spin-one-half states. The result is four massive spin-$3/2$ states, with spin projections $\pm 3/2,\pm 1/2$. In supergravity the additional longitudinal states can be supplied by the super-Higgs mechanism.

A supercharge is an odd Weyl spinor generator. The mixed anticommutator has one undotted and one dotted index, hence transforms as a Lorentz four-vector. In the minimal Super-Poincaré algebra, its only spacetime generator is the four-momentum, so covariance fixes it to $c{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\mu }{P}_{\mu }$. Normalizing the charges canonically fixes $c=2$:The number two is a normalization, not something Lorentz covariance alone could fix under $Q\mapsto aQ$.

For an explicit closure calculation, use left Grassmann derivatives in superspace and the differential translation convention $P_{\mu }=i{\partial }_{\mu }$:Each of the two derivative-coordinate cross terms contributes $i{\sigma }^{\mu }{\partial }_{\mu }$; the other terms cancel by anticommutativity. This proves the displayed coefficient. The same calculation gives $\{Q,Q\}=\{\bar{Q},\bar{Q}\}=0$ and $[P_{\mu },Q]=[P_{\mu },\bar{Q}]=0$. There is no scalar central charge for a single supersymmetry label: symmetry of the anticommutator is incompatible with a term proportional only to the antisymmetric ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$.

In the massive rest frame $P_{\mu }=(m,0,0,0)$, the mixed relation is $\{Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }^{†}\}=2m{\delta }_{\alpha \beta }$. These positive canonical anticommutation relations supply the input for the normalization and finite fermionic Fock space in the question-level continuation.

The remaining non-derivative component term in the Lagrangian is the Yukawa interactionEquivalently the interaction Hamiltonian has the opposite displayed sign. The first term is the two-component fermion mass, and the second its scalar-fermion interaction. A phase redefinition of $\psi$ makes the mass coefficient nonnegative, so the physical Weyl spinor mass isIt is again independent of $\alpha$, the choice of root and any sign of a real $M_v$. This distinguishes the complex bilinear coefficient from the nonnegative physical mass. In the pure-linear supersymmetry-breaking branch $W^{\prime \prime }=0$, the fermion is the massless Goldstino.

Use signature $\eta =\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$, the numerical matrices ${\sigma }_{\mu }=(I,{\sigma }_i)$ and ${\bar{\sigma }}_{\mu }=(I,-{\sigma }_i)$ given in the question, and raise genuine tensor indices with $\eta$. A real Minkowski spacetime vector corresponds to the Hermitian matrixFor SL(2,C) matrices, $X^{\prime }=AX{A}^{†}$ is Hermitian and has the same determinant. It therefore induces a real linear Lorentz transformation; composition of the congruence actions agrees with matrix multiplication. The kernel consists of $\pm I$: preservation of $X=I$ makes a kernel element unitary, and preservation of every Hermitian $X$ makes it scalar.

Polar decomposition of an invertible complex matrix connects every determinant-one complex matrix to its unitary factor, so the group is connected. The action gives the Lorentz spinor double cover of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group. It covers rotations via $A_R=e^{-i\vartheta \mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }/2}$ and boosts via the positive Hermitian matrices below. Every proper orthochronous transformation is a boost followed by a rotation, since one can first match its image of the future unit time vector and then use its rotation stabilizer. The congruence construction does not cover spatial parity or time reversal. In particular parity has determinant $-1$ as a four-vector transformation; all transformations continuously produced from SL(2,C) have determinant $+1$.

Set $c_{\theta }=\cosh (\theta /2)$, $s_{\theta }=\sinh (\theta /2)$ and $N=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$. The Pauli matrix multiplication law gives $N^2=I$. The proposed boost matrix is $A_B=c_{\theta }I+s_{\theta }N$, with eigenvalues $e^{\pm \theta /2}$, determinant one and $A_B^{†}=A_B$. Split $\mathbf{x}=x_{\parallel }\mathbf{n}+{\mathbf{x}}_{\perp }$. The perpendicular Pauli part anticommutes with $N$, so multiplication givesThis is an active Lorentz boost. The image of a rest worldline has velocity $\mathbf{v}=\tanh \theta \mathbf{n}$, fixing the velocity sign convention.

For two nonzero boosts, write $A^{\prime }=c^{\prime }I+s^{\prime }{\mathbf{n}}^{\prime }\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ and $A=cI+s\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$. Their product isThe last term is anti-Hermitian. Thus $A^{\prime }A$ is not Hermitian unless the axes are collinear; a pure boost has Hermitian lifts $\pm A_B$, so it cannot give the same Lorentz transformation. The noncollinear boost obstruction from Pauli products is thereforeThat rotation is a Wigner rotation. A zero-rapidity factor is the trivial exception, regardless of the arbitrary axis assigned to it.

Define $J_i=\frac{1}{2}{ϵ}_{ijk}{M}_{jk}$ and $K_i=M_{0i}$. The printed Lorentz algebra brackets giveSet $L_i=(J_i+i{K}_i)/2$, $R_i=(J_i-i{K}_i)/2$. ThenThis is the chiral decomposition of the complex Lorentz algebra. The two copies are the complexifications of the SU(2) algebras conventionally labelled left and right. They are not two independent compact real subalgebras of the real Lorentz algebra: $L,R$ are complex linear combinations of the real generators. The distinction is needed for noncompact boosts.

To verify the infinitesimal two-component action, putIts trace vanishes by antisymmetry, so $\det A=1+O({\omega }^2)$. The Pauli matrix multiplication law impliesSince $a^{†}=\frac{1}{4}{\omega }^{\mu \nu }{\bar{\sigma }}_{\nu }{\sigma }_{\mu }$, antisymmetrizing this identity yieldsConsequently $AX{A}^{†}=X+{\sigma }_{\mu }{\omega }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }{x}^{\nu }+O({\omega }^2)$, exactly the claimed infinitesimal coordinate transformation with ${\omega }^{\mu }{}_{\nu }={\omega }^{\mu \rho }{\eta }_{\rho \nu }$.

The two Weyl spinor representations transform asBoth maps preserve group multiplication. For $\Lambda =e^{\omega }$, choose its spin lift and write the finite matrices asFor rotations these coincide as the SU(2) doublet; for boosts their generator signs are opposite. Any complex-linear intertwiner would commute with all rotations and hence be scalar by the Schur lemma, but a nonzero scalar cannot intertwine the opposite boost matrices. They are therefore inequivalent. Infinitesimally their $K_i$ matrices are $-i{\sigma }_i/2$ and $+i{\sigma }_i/2$, while their $J_i$ matrices are both ${\sigma }_i/2$. Thus they have chiral labels $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$. The finite matrices are representations of the spin cover; choosing $A$ or $-A$ matters for spinors even though their four-vector transformations coincide.

Using the supplied block gamma matrices, the generator of the Dirac spinor isThe antisymmetry of $\omega$ removes the symmetric Clifford part. Hence

There is a conjugation-order error in the last displayed gamma identity in the PDF. The Clifford algebra gives, with ${\gamma }^{\rho }={\eta }^{\rho \sigma }{\gamma }_{\sigma }$,Exponentiating this linear commutator action proves the inverse Lorentz action on gamma matricesThe second identity is the order required for the requested bilinears when $\psi \mapsto S\psi$. An explicit countercheck to the printed order is a positive boost along the third axis: ${\omega }^{03}=-\theta$ giveswhereas the printed right side has a plus sign. This cannot be repaired by dropping index raising; the same raising convention is needed in the preceding coordinate transformation.

The adjoint relation supplied in the question gives ${\Omega }^{†}{\gamma }^0=-{\gamma }^0\Omega$, hence the Dirac spinor pseudo-unitarity identity $S^{†}{\gamma }^{0}S={\gamma }^0$. The Dirac adjoint therefore transforms as $\bar{\psi }\mapsto \bar{\psi }{S}^{-1}$. It now follows that the Dirac scalar bilinear isthe vector isand the antisymmetric second-rank tensor isThese are respectively a Lorentz scalar, Lorentz four-vector and Lorentz tensor. The source's inconsistent gamma identity is replaced by its correct inverse/order pair; all three transformation laws then follow with the stated spinor transformation.

The proper orthochronous Lorentz group is the connected Lorentz group in the question. Its double cover is $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$, viewed as a real Lie group. Identify a spacetime vector with the Hermitian matrixThe action $X\mapsto SX{S}^{†}$ for $S\in SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ preserves this determinant and hence the Minkowski metric. The group is connected, so its image is proper and orthochronous. Its kernel consists of $\pm I$: a matrix in the kernel first preserves $I$, hence is unitary, and then commutes with every Hermitian matrix, so is scalar; determinant one forces the two signs. Matrices in $SU(2)$ generate spatial rotations, and positive Hermitian determinant-one matrices generate boosts. Rotations and boosts generate the connected Lorentz group, so the action is onto. Polar decomposition also gives $SL(2,\mathbb{C})\cong SU(2)\times {\mathbb{R}}^3$ as a manifold, proving that it is simply connected. This establishes the Lorentz spinor double cover.

In an anti-Hermitian rotation-generator convention, the Lorentz algebra brackets areThe negative sign in the last bracket distinguishes boosts from Euclidean four-dimensional rotations. After complexification, setA direct bracket calculation gives $[A_i,A_j]={ϵ}_{ijk}{A}_k$, $[B_i,B_j]={ϵ}_{ijk}{B}_k$ and $[A_i,B_j]=0$. Thus the chiral decomposition of the complex Lorentz algebra isComplexification matters: the real Lorentz algebra is not the compact real algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)\oplus \mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Each spin-$j$ homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 extends from $SU(2)$ to $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ as $D_j(S)={\mathrm{Sym}}^{2j}S$. Its complex-conjugate extension uses $\overline{S}$. The finite-dimensional irreducible complex group representations of the covering group are thereforeThe two separate complexified Lie-algebra factors act irreducibly on the two spin spaces, so their tensor product is irreducible. Conversely an invariant complex subspace for the real group is invariant under its complexified Lie algebra; the highest-weight classification for the two ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ factors gives exactly these tensor products. This constructs all finite-dimensional complex Lorentz representations.

Again $-I\in SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ acts by $(-1{)}^{2j_L+2j_R}$. Therefore the irreducible representations of the connected Lorentz group itself, in this finite-dimensional complex category, areIf the sum is a half-integer, the group representation is a group representation of the spin cover, or a projective group representation of the Lorentz group, and is not an ordinary single-valued group representation of the group named in the question.

The scalar $(0,0)$ and four-vector $(1/2,1/2)$ descend. The left and right Weyl spinors, $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$, do not. Their direct sum is a Dirac spinor, reducible under the connected group; parity exchanges its two chiral summands. The group representations $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ describe the two complex chiral parts of an antisymmetric tensor. On the rotation subgroup, self-duality of $SU(2)$ irreducibles identifies the conjugate spin space with the usual spin space, so the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 gives the same spin range $|j_L-j_R|,\dots ,j_L+j_R$ as in part (i).

These are group representations used for fields, and they need not be unitary for a positive-definite inner product. Indeed no nontrivial finite-dimensional group representation of this group is unitary: if it were, its differential would embed the simple real Lorentz algebra into an algebra of skew-Hermitian matrices. The trace form $-\mathrm{tr}(XY)$ would give an invariant positive-definite form $b$ on that algebra. Invariance and the boost brackets would then force $-b(J_3,J_3)=b([K_1,K_2],J_3)=b(K_1,[K_2,J_3])=b(K_1,K_1)$, impossible for positive-definite $b$. Equivalently nontrivial boosts in these polynomial group representations have real exponential rather than phase eigenvalues.

The qualification about dimension is necessary because a noncompact group also has infinite-dimensional unitary group representations. They too can be built using $SU(2)$ spin spaces, but not by a single finite pair. For example, the rotation content of induced Lorentz representations is obtained from normalized induced representations of the upper triangular subgroup of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$, with $n\in \mathbb{Z}$, $\rho \in \mathbb{R}$ and unitary characters $(a/|a|{)}^n|a{|}^{2i\rho }$ on its diagonal $(a,a^{-1})$, trivial on its unipotent part. In the compact picture this uses functions on $SU(2)$ satisfyingExpanding functions into $SU(2)$ matrix coefficients selects a single right-torus weight from each spin space, giving the rotation contentNormalized induction supplies the boost action, coupling these infinitely many rotation spaces. The central sign is $(-1{)}^n$, so the even-$n$ family descends to the connected Lorentz group and has integer rotation spins. This explains both the finite-dimensional field construction and why a classification of unitary group representations cannot simply be identified with the finite two-spin labels.

Chirality and the component expansion. A chiral superfield is constrained byUse left Grassmann derivatives. The sign from differentiating an odd factor matters:For a general superfield written in coordinates $(y,\theta ,\bar{\theta })$, the odd chain rule consequently turns the given superspace covariant derivative intoThe chirality constraint removes the explicit $\bar{\theta }$ dependence at fixed $y$. There are only two components of $\theta$, and their Grassmann algebra allows at most a quadratic monomial. Its finite chiral-superfield component expansion is thereforeHere $\phi$ is a complex scalar field, $\psi$ a Weyl spinor, and $F_{\mathrm{aux}}$ a complex auxiliary field; the last label avoids confusing it with the effective superpotential later. The factor $\sqrt{2}$ is the standard canonical component normalization. In ordinary coordinates the same statement isThis translation exponential terminates because its shift is nilpotent; it displays the full component dependence without an unstated convention for the barred spinor square.

A superspace covariant derivative obeys the graded product rule. Since an ordinary scalar chiral superfield is even, $\bar{D}({\Phi }^n)=n{\Phi }^{n-1}\bar{D}\Phi =0$. Linear combinations prove the polynomial claim. More generally, a nonsingular holomorphic function of chiral fields is chiral; inserting conjugate fields generally spoils this holomorphic closure of chiral superfields.

The superspace action. For a real Kähler potential and a holomorphic superpotential, the global chiral-field action has Lagrangian densityFull superspace integration gives a D-term, and chiral superspace integration an F-term. The action is real, and its supersymmetry variations are spacetime total derivatives. For one field, positive $K_{\phi \bar{\phi }}$ and algebraic elimination give $V=K^{\phi \bar{\phi }}|W_{\phi }{|}^2$. The Wess–Zumino model uses the canonical choice $K={\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ at tree level.

Scalar potential and the vertex. In canonical normalization, the auxiliary part of the Lagrangian density isSubstitution leaves ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{aux}}=-|W_{\phi }{|}^2$. Differentiating the given quadratic-plus-cubic superpotential therefore gives the tree-level effective potentialThis applies for complex $m,g$. In terms of canonically normalized real fields $\phi =(A+iB)/\sqrt{2}$, phases may be chosen to make $m,g$ real, in which caseThe complex-field quartic interaction is ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{int}}=-|g{|}^2{\phi }^{\ast 2}{\phi }^2$. There are two identical external legs of each field type. Differentiating with respect to those four fields, or counting the Wick attachments to the vertex, produces the factor $2!2!$:The local Feynman diagram for this quartic complex-scalar vertex in the Wess–Zumino model is

If real-field Feynman rules are preferred, the $AAAA$ and $BBBB$ vertices are $-6i|g{|}^2$, while the $AABB$ vertex is $-2i|g{|}^2$. These are the same interaction in a different component basis. They should not be confused with a convention that absorbs $2!2!$ into the coefficient of the complex quartic term.

Spurion symmetries. Treat $m,g$ as chiral spurions. An ordinary $U(1)$ acts on $\Phi ,m,g$ with charges $(1,-2,-3)$ and leaves $\theta$ neutral. An R-symmetry gives $\theta$ charge one and $\Phi ,m,g$ charges $(1,0,-1)$. Thus

Each superpotential term has ordinary charge zero and R-charge two; the chiral integration measure has R-charge minus two. In particular $m$ is neutral under the specified R-symmetry. These are formal transformations of fields and parameters together, not two exact symmetries of a theory with arbitrary fixed nontransforming numerical couplings. This Wess–Zumino spurion charge assignment is useful because it constrains possible quantum terms.

The general holomorphic form. Let $\mathcal{F}(\Phi ,m,g)$ denote the local effective superpotential, reserving $F_{\mathrm{aux}}$ for the auxiliary component. The holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization permits dependence on the chiral spurions, not on their conjugates. The dimensionless combination $z=g\Phi /m$ is neutral under both formal symmetries, whereas $m{\Phi }^2$ has the required dimension and charges. Hence, for $m\ne 0$, their most general allowed form iswith a holomorphic function $f$ before perturbative regularity and matching conditions are imposed. Equivalently, a monomial $m^a{g}^b{\Phi }^c$ must obeySolving gives $a=1-b$, $c=b+2$. Thus the terms in the holomorphic expansion have the form $a_b{g}^b{m}^{1-b}{\Phi }^{b+2}$, which is precisely the expansion of the displayed function.

What is and is not renormalized. Apply the non-renormalization theorem to a local Wilsonian effective action retaining the elementary field and a nonzero infrared cutoff. Perturbative coefficients are regular as $g\to 0$ and $m\to 0$: no massless infrared modes have been integrated all the way to zero momentum. Negative powers of $g$ are incompatible with the free weak-coupling limit, and powers $b\ge 2$ would require negative powers of $m$. Only the quadratic and cubic structures survive this regularity test. Their coefficients cannot acquire a loop correction here: a quadratic term with no $g$ is the free-theory mass term, while a cubic term only linear in $g$ is already the tree interaction. A loop renormalizing that cubic term requires additional interaction insertions. Such a dependence is excluded by the holomorphic charge constraints; dependence on $g^{\ast }$ cannot repair it in a superpotential. Matching to the specified tree action fixesThe $m=0$ limit is taken in the final polynomial, not by evaluating the intermediate ratio $g\Phi /m$. The holomorphic Wilsonian superpotential and its parameters $m,g$ receive no independent perturbative vertex renormalization. Symmetries alone would only give the arbitrary function $f$; regularity and the free/tree matching are necessary to reach the stronger conclusion.

The Kähler potential is not protected by that theorem. In particular a corrected kinetic term $Z(\mu ){\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ leads to wave-function renormalization. Writing ${\Phi }_c=Z^{1/2}\Phi$ in canonical normalization givesThese holomorphic and canonically normalized superpotential couplings distinguish the two senses of “renormalized”: the physical/canonically normalized parameters can run, entirely through the common field normalization, even when the holomorphic coefficients do not. The scalar effective potential can consequently receive quantum corrections through the Kähler potential. Nor does the local perturbative statement automatically apply to infrared-singular one-particle-irreducible actions or to integrating out whole massive fields. Non-renormalization protects the local holomorphic F-term, not the complete quantum action or every physically normalized mass and coupling.

Use the hypercharge normalization $Q_{\mathrm{electric}}=T^3+Y$. All matter chiral superfields are written with left-handed Weyl spinors, so the fields denoted by a superscript $c$ contain the charge conjugates of the usual right-handed Standard Model fermions. The MSSM superfield representations areEach fermion generation contributes the first five chiral superfields. Their complex scalar field partners are squarks for the quarks and sleptons for the leptons. Each Higgs chiral doublet contains a Higgs complex scalar field and a higgsino. Every chiral superfield also has a complex auxiliary field. The vector superfields areThey contain the corresponding gauge bosons, gauginos in the Adjoint representation, and real auxiliary fields. A right-handed neutrino chiral superfield is not part of the minimal field content.

A gauge anomaly is a quantum obstruction to a classical gauge symmetry. For hypercharge, triangle diagrams with left-handed Weyl spinors can violate the Ward identity of the gauge boson; an uncancelled gauge anomaly makes the gauge theory inconsistent. Anomaly cancellation sums over every component, including colour and weak multiplicities. Complex scalar fields do not contribute to these chiral gauge anomalies. For one fermion generation, the cubic hypercharge coefficient isThe other coefficients involving a hypercharge gauge boson vanish too. With the fundamental index $T(\mathbf{N})=1/2$,The last line is the mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly. Coefficients with one non-Abelian generator and two hypercharge generators vanish by tracelessness. For completeness, the purely colour cubic gauge anomaly cancels between the two fundamental quark components and the two antifundamentals; the weak group has no perturbative cubic gauge anomaly. Its four left-handed doublets per fermion generation also avoid the Witten SU(2) anomaly. Thus each family is separately anomaly-free, not merely their sum.

The gauginos do not spoil this result: their hypercharge is zero and their Adjoint representation is real. One extra Higgs chiral doublet is different because its higgsino is chiral. For $H_u$, its contributions areThey have no compensating contribution from the Higgs complex scalar field. The higgsino in $H_d$ supplies precisely the negative of each coefficient. Opposite-hypercharge Higgs chiral doublets restore anomaly cancellation. The same pair restores an even number of weak fermion doublets, so the Witten SU(2) anomaly provides an additional check of the higgsino anomaly cancellation.

The independent reason is the holomorphic need for two Higgs chiral doublets. A superpotential is a holomorphic function of chiral superfields, so it cannot use a conjugate Higgs superfield to generate the missing Yukawa couplings. The ordinary Standard Model can use a Higgs scalar and its conjugate, but the MSSM needs distinct chiral superfields of both hypercharges. For example,where the dot contracts weak indices with the antisymmetric tensor. All three terms are gauge-invariant holomorphic functions. $H_u$ supplies up-type masses, while $H_d$ supplies down-type and charged-lepton masses. Replacing either by the conjugate of the other would violate the holomorphic closure of chiral superfields.

Use the minimal four-dimensional Super-Poincaré algebra, with $\{Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }\}=0$, $\{Q_{\alpha },{\bar{Q}}_{\dot{\beta }}\}=2{\sigma }_{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^{\nu }{P}_{\nu }$ and commuting translations. Lorentz covariance and closure on the existing supercharges permit onlyThe graded Jacobi identity for $P^{\mu },Q_{\alpha },Q_{\beta }$ therefore givesFor example, with ${\sigma }^0=I$, $\mu =0$ and $\alpha =\beta =1$, the coefficient is a nonzero multiple of $A(P_1-i{P}_2)$. Independence of the translation generators forces $A=0$. Its adjoint gives the barred result. Thus every supercharge commutes with four-momentum:Consequently $[Q_{\alpha },P^2]=0$. If $|u⟩$ has a particular mass-shell condition, the nonzero state $Q_{\alpha }|u⟩$ has the same one. This gives supersymmetric mass degeneracy within an unbroken physical supermultiplet. The qualification matters: after spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, the chosen vacuum is not annihilated by the supercharges, and its one-particle excitations need not constitute degenerate supermultiplets.

For the O'Raifeartaigh model, write $X={\varphi }_1$, $Y={\varphi }_2$, $Z={\varphi }_3$. Field phases allow $g,M,m$ to be positive. The canonical Kähler potential and elimination of the auxiliary fields give the F-term scalar potentialA supersymmetric vacuum would require $W_Y=MZ=0$, hence $Z=0$, while $W_X=g(Z^2-m^2)=-g{m}^2$ could not vanish. Thus F-flatness is impossible. More precisely, with $Z=u+iv$,The stated strict inequality makes every nonconstant term nonnegative. The entire classical vacuum family isHere $F_X=-\overline{W_X}=g{m}^2$, while $F_Y=F_Z=0$. The Weyl spinor ${\psi }_X$ is the massless goldstino, and the complex scalar field $X$ is a pseudomodulus with two zero tree-level squared masses. The hierarchy $M\gg m$ separates the massive fields from the breaking scale, but it does not itself select $x=0$ along this flat direction.

At the representative vacuum $x=0$, the chiral-superfield fermion mass matrix isIts physical masses are its singular values: $0,M,M$. The two massive Weyl spinors can be combined into one massive Dirac spinor. For $Y=(y_R+i{y}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, $Z=(z_R+i{z}_I)/\sqrt{2}$, the real scalar squared masses areIn particular, there is no tachyon under the stated inequality. The splitting of the $Z$ masses displays supersymmetry breaking directly.

For completeness, the mass spectrum can be given throughout the classical vacuum family, rather than silently fixing the pseudomodulus. A phase rotation makes $x$ real and nonnegative without changing physical masses. The massive fermion squared masses areThe real and imaginary scalar sectors have two-by-two scalar squared-mass matriceswhose eigenvalues areBoth determinants are $M^2(M^2+2ϵg^2{m}^2)>0$ and their traces are positive, so stability holds at every finite $x$. Quantum corrections can lift a pseudomodulus; these formulas describe the classical, tree-level spectrum requested here.

Define the physical mass supertrace byEach real scalar contributes once and each Weyl spinor twice with a minus sign. At $x=0$ this gives $4M^2-2(2M^2)=0$. At general $x$, ${\sum }_{ϵ,\pm }{b}_{ϵ,\pm }=4M^2+8g^2|x{|}^2=2(f_{+}+f_{-})$. Hence the tree-level mass supertrace vanishes despite broken supersymmetry:This is the tree-level supertrace mass sum rule, not a claim that the individual masses are equal.