Separates thylakoid lumen from chloroplast stroma in a chloroplast.

The number of target chemical atoms per incident area along the beam. For a uniform foil at normal incidence, number density $n$ and thickness $t$ give $n_s=nt$, in ${\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. At oblique incidence the traversed path must replace $t$. The single-encounter count model requires the chance of two significant deflections to be negligible and energy loss through the foil to be small. A small probability in one detector patch alone does not establish either condition.

The Peltier effect is heat transfer associated with an electric current crossing a junction between materials with different Peltier coefficients. At fixed junction temperature, its contribution changes sign when the conventional current reverses. A junction can absorb heat from its surroundings for one direction and release it for the other. Joule heating, proportional to the square of the electric current, accompanies this transport but does not reverse sign. Consequently, observing a warm device alone does not identify the Peltier effect.

This makes the Peltier effect useful as an electrically controlled heat pump: reversing the supply can switch an object's thermal role without changing any plumbing. In thermoelectric cooling, however, the useful cooling is the junction's absorbed heat minus returning heat conduction and its share of Joule heating. Increasing electric current eventually makes cooling worse. The distinction between transported heat and net cooling is the central practical lesson of the thermoelectric cooler energy balance.

A thermoelectric module connects thermoelectric material pairs between thermal faces. Electrical series connections and thermal parallel connections combine their transport responses for thermoelectric cooling or electrical generation.

The Thomson effect is distributed reversible heating or cooling when an electric current flows through a homogeneous material with a temperature gradient. It is distinct from junction Peltier effect heating and even-in-current Joule heating.

A dilution refrigerator removes heat at very low temperatures by transferring helium-3 from a concentrated phase into a dilute phase rich in helium-4. The enthalpy per circulating helium-3 atom is higher in the dilute phase, so crossing the phase boundary absorbs energy from the mixing chamber of a dilution refrigerator. This is the useful cooling process.

Continuous operation requires a circulation loop. A dilution refrigerator still preferentially evaporates helium-3 from the returning mixture; pumps return it through a condensing and precooling path. Heat exchangers let the outgoing cold stream cool the incoming stream before it reaches the mixing region.^[ref] A heater attached to the cold stage can impose a known test load, allowing a measurement of cooling power versus temperature. Unwanted heat conduction through supports and wiring, and absorbed thermal radiation, enter that same load budget. The refrigerator therefore needs both the microscopic mixing mechanism and careful thermal coupling to the experiment.

Maxwell's demon is a thought experiment in which a controller measures microscopic motion and selectively operates a barrier, apparently driving a system away from thermal equilibrium without the usual thermodynamic cost. For example, admitting fast gas particles preferentially to one side seems to create a temperature difference that a heat engine could exploit.

The controller must be included in the physical accounting. Its measurement record becomes correlated with the gas, and a repeatable cyclic device must deal with that record rather than treating information storage as an unlimited free resource. Landauer's principle connects logically irreversible memory erasure with a thermodynamic cost under its stated conditions. This does not mean that every measurement automatically dissipates exactly one bit's erasure cost. The point is to track the complete cycle, correlations and resources. A controller that reduces one subsystem's entropy can still respect the Second law of thermodynamics by increasing entropy elsewhere.

In his Nobel lecture, delivered on 12 December 1929 for the 1928 prize, Owen Willans Richardson recalled heating wires for weeks while hand-pumping away gas released by the apparatus. With platinum, he found a finite emission per unit area that rose rapidly with temperature. His initial 1901 formula used $T^{1/2}$; he preferred the $T^2$ form in 1911.^[ref]

The early apparatus surrounded a heated platinum wire with a metal cylinder connected to earth through a galvanometer. Wire electrical resistance supplied the temperature readout. After checking collection saturation, Richardson measured at a wire potential of $-120\mathrm{V}$, over roughly $1300$–$1600\mathrm{K}$; reversing polarity suppressed the negative discharge.^[ref]

The inference rests on several controls. A temperature sweep probes thermal escape; reversing the collecting electric field tests the sign of the mobile electric charge; varying collection voltage tests whether transport is limiting. Prolonged pumping and heating test whether a transient gas release is responsible. These controls address different alternatives, and none by itself establishes a clean, uniform surface.

For a modern repetition, stabilize each temperature, measure the collector electric current against collecting electric potential difference, and record the pressure and surface preparation. Repeat selected temperatures after cooling to reveal drift. Use the collection plateau and the actual emitting area to construct a Richardson plot. The resulting slope estimates the work function only within the stated surface and transport assumptions; it does not turn an uncontrolled wire into a reference material.

A space-charge-limited thermionic current occurs when the negative space charge of emitted electrons creates an electric field that obstructs further transport across the gap. Raising the emitter temperature may then increase the surface supply without producing the corresponding collector electric current. The gap geometry and collecting electric potential difference matter even when the surface is stable.

To distinguish this from an emission-limited thermionic current, vary the collecting electric potential difference at fixed emitter temperature, then repeat at another temperature. A voltage-dependent transport region followed by a collection plateau separates a gap constraint from a supply constraint. A weak collector electric current alone cannot establish a high work function. Nor does simply choosing a very large collecting electric potential difference guarantee a valid zero-field measurement: the surface barrier may then change.

An emission-limited thermionic current is set by the rate at which the heated surface supplies electrons, with nearly complete collection. At fixed temperature, increasing the attracting electric potential difference then produces an approximate collection plateau. That plateau is the useful regime for fitting the Richardson-Dushman law, provided the electric field has not significantly lowered the surface barrier.

The emitting surface still matters in this regime. Adsorption changes the work function; different crystal faces can have different barriers. Heating may desorb contaminants or change a coating, so repeated measurements at the same temperature need not agree unless the surface preparation is controlled. For fixed $A,T$, a barrier change $\Delta W$ multiplies $J$ by $e^{-\Delta W/(k_{B}T)}$. In the chosen model at $1000\mathrm{K}$, raising the barrier by $0.10\mathrm{eV}$ reduces $J$ to about 0.313 of its previous value.

The Richardson-Dushman law models the magnitude of emitted electric current density asHere $T$ is absolute thermodynamic temperature, $W$ is the work function, $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, and $A$ is the Thermionic Richardson constant. The signed electric current density points opposite to the outgoing electron motion; $J$ here is positive. For uniform emission over area $S$, the emitted electric current magnitude is $I=SJ$.

The Richardson-Dushman law assumes an emitter close to thermal equilibrium, a surface with a well-defined and approximately constant work function over the fitted temperature range, and predominantly thermal escape over the barrier. Interpreting a measured collector electric current with this law additionally requires an emission-limited thermionic current, known emitting area, and negligible return emission from the collector. Strong electric fields can lower the surface barrier or enable quantum tunnelling; then this zero-field expression is insufficient.

For a deliberately chosen teaching model, take $W=2.0\mathrm{eV}$ and $A=120\mathrm{A}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-2}$, expressing the barrier in electronvolts. These are illustrative parameters, not measured properties of a named material. Using $k_B=8.617333262\times 10^{-5}\mathrm{eV}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, at $1000\mathrm{K}$ the Boltzmann factor is about $8.33\times 10^{-11}$, yetA 20 percent increase in temperature raises the predicted electric current density by about 69 times. For a chosen emitting area $S=0.010\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, these correspond to approximately $0.100\mathrm{mA}$ and $6.89\mathrm{mA}$ if collection is complete. The small escaping fraction is replenished by the external electrical circuit.

The sensitivity is especially clear from the logarithmic derivative at fixed $A,W$:In the chosen model at $1000\mathrm{K}$, a $1\mathrm{K}$ rise changes $J$ by about 2.5 percent to first order. Accurate temperature measurement matters even when electric current measurement is easy.

For fixed particle number and temperature, a bubble with surface tension $\Gamma$ and area $\alpha V^{2/3}$ has effective availability $A(V)=F_{\mathrm{gas}}(T,V,N)+\Gamma \alpha V^{2/3}+p_{R}V$. Its stationary condition is $p_{\mathrm{gas}}-p_R=(2/3)\Gamma \alpha V^{-1/3}$. Its curvature is $A^{\prime \prime }=V^{-1}[{\kappa }_T^{-1}-(2/9)\Gamma \alpha V^{-1/3}]$. Positive curvature is required for stable Gaussian fluctuation approximation. The variance follows from availability curvature and equilibrium fluctuations. For an ideal gas, the restoring denominator becomes $p_R+(4/9)\Gamma \alpha V^{-1/3}>0$ for positive $p_R$. Treating the internal pressure as externally fixed instead of fixing the gas particle number changes the stability problem.

For gapped excitations with $C(T)\simeq A\exp [-\Delta /(k_{B}T)]$ and approximately constant prefactor, two heat capacity measurements at $T_2>T_1$ give the displayed activation-energy estimate. A more general prefactor $A{T}^p$ changes its numerator to $\ln [C(T_2)/C(T_1)]-p\ln (T_2/T_1)$. The two-point estimate measures an effective exponential scale; it does not independently determine the prefactor or establish a detailed excitation density of states.