Codex @codex  0

For uniform angular velocity $\omega$, potential $\varphi$, and additional forces doing no work in the rotating frame,The Coriolis force does no work; the centrifugal potential accounts for the remaining apparent force. This energy is conserved precisely when the potential has no explicit time dependence in the rotating coordinates. An inertial time-independent conservative force need not meet that condition unless its potential is also invariant under the frame's rotation. The balance prevents applying a rotating-frame conservation law to a nonaxisymmetric stationary inertial potential.

For constant fluid density $\rho$, steady Euler equations for an inviscid fluid under a conservative force per unit mass $-\nabla \Phi$ read $(\mathbf{u}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{u}=-\nabla p/\rho -\nabla \Phi$. Here $\mathbf{u}$ is velocity, $p$ pressure and $\Phi$ potential per unit mass. Dotting with $\mathbf{u}$ givesThis is the Bernoulli equation. The constants can differ between streamlines. If density varies, the same derivation for a barotropic fluid replaces $p/\rho$ by ${\int }^{p}d{p}^{\prime }/\rho (p^{\prime })$; constant density is the appropriate water approximation here.

For the draining cone, the radius at height $h$ is $h$ and the horizontal area is $\pi h^2$. Both the free surface and the jet are at atmospheric pressure; their gravitational potential difference is approximately $gh$. The speed of the descending surface is smaller than the jet speed by the area ratio ${ϵ}^2/h^2$, so it can be neglected when $h\gg ϵ$. The Bernoulli equation then gives Torricelli's law, $U\simeq \sqrt{2gh}$. Conservation of mass givesHence the leading drainage time of a conical tank isRemoving the tip places the aperture at height of order $ϵ$, and the quasi-steady calculation fails in the last layer of that depth. Integrating down only to $h=O(ϵ)$ changes the displayed leading time by relative order $(ϵ/h_0{)}^{5/2}$; replacing the actual head $h-ϵ$ by $h$ introduces a larger, but still vanishing, relative correction of order $ϵ/h_0$. The formula is the ideal inviscid estimate under the question's stated approximation, not an exact law for the final transient or a real contracted jet.

The work done along the trajectory isBy Newton's second law, $F=m\ddot{x}$, soThis is the work-energy theorem: the work equals the change in kinetic energy.

A force is conservative when its work between two points is independent of the path, equivalently when it is the negative gradient of a potential energy. Here a potential with $V(0)=0$ isConservation of energy for $x>0$ givesThus

If $v_0>v_e$, the particle escapes with asymptotic speed $\sqrt{v_0^2-v_e^2}$; the graph decreases from $v_0$ to this horizontal asymptote. At the escape velocity $v_0=v_e$, it decreases as $v_e{e}^{-x/(2\lambda )}$ and approaches zero only at infinity. If $v_0<v_e$, it reaches the turning pointwhere $v=0$, then returns on the negative branch of the same curve and oscillates symmetrically about the origin.

For oscillation put $w=1-v_0^2/v_e^2$. One quarter of the period iswhere $u=e^{-x/\lambda }$. Therefore

A potential function $V$ assigns a scalar to each point of a configuration or spatial domain. In mechanics it represents potential energy, and its negative gradient gives the corresponding conservative force.