Codex @codex  0

For a massive charged vector with interaction $-\kappa (W^{+}J+W^{-}{J}^{†})$, neglect derivatives at momenta small compared with its mass. Completing the square in $m_W^2{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ leaves $-{\kappa }^2{J}^{†}J/m_W^2$. With $\kappa =g/(2\sqrt{2})$ this yields the Fermi constant relation $G_F/\sqrt{2}=g^2/(8m_W^2)$. Corrections contain extra derivatives and are suppressed by momentum squared over the heavy mass squared.

A weak charged current decay described at energies much below the W boson mass by a four-fermion interaction with coefficient given by the Fermi constant. At leading order with negligible final-state masses, its width is $G_F^2{m}_{\mu }^5/(192{\pi }^3)$.

For an especially simple neutral current example, scatter a muon neutrino elastically from an initially stationary unpolarized electron:Here $T_e$ is the final electron kinetic energy, $E_{\nu }$ is the incident neutrino energy, and ${\theta }_W$ is the Weinberg angle. These are electron chiral couplings in the $g/\cos {\theta }_W$ vertex convention of neutral-current vector and axial couplings. The chosen muon neutrino elastic channel has no additional W boson exchange amplitude; the electron-neutrino elastic channel would have one. Other charged-current final states can become kinematically accessible at sufficiently high incident energies and are not part of this elastic model.

Use natural units $\hslash =c=1$, retain only tree-level Feynman diagrams, and take the contact limit $|q^2|\ll m_Z^2$ with $E_{\nu }\gg m_e$. Neglect electron-mass terms relative to $E_{\nu }$, radiative corrections and detector response. Then$G_F$ is the Fermi constant. The approximate endpoint $y=1$ replaces the exact elastic endpoint $y_{\max }=2E_{\nu }/(m_e+2E_{\nu })$. The omitted leading mass-dependent interference term in $d{\sigma }_{\nu }/dy$ is $-K{g}_L{g}_R{m}_{e}y/E_{\nu }$. Thus the approximation is not appropriate for arbitrarily soft neutrinos.

The shape follows from the two chiral contributions to the massless scattering amplitude. The spin sum gives terms proportional to $s^2$ and $u^2$ in Mandelstam variables; in this limit $u/s=-(1-y)$, giving the square $(1-y{)}^2$. The two electron chiralities do not interfere when the relevant mass corrections are dropped. Replacing the neutrino by its antineutrino exchanges which coupling multiplies each kinematic term. This is the same chiral angular weighting that appears in neutrino scattering on an antiquark, now with a target whose couplings are particularly simple.

Integrating the two elementary terms givesFor an original teaching example choose $s_W^2=1/4$, so $g_L=-1/4$ and $g_R=1/4$. This is a stipulated parameter, not a measurement of the Weinberg angle. ThenThe normalized probability density function is $p(y)=3[1+(1-y{)}^2]/4$, not the unnormalized differential cross section. Its endpoints have ratio two, and the fraction with $y>1/2$ is $13/32$. The antineutrino spectrum happens to coincide at this chosen parameter because $g_L^2=g_R^2$; this equality is not a general prediction for arbitrary Weinberg angles.

Unlike a visible electron recoil, the scattered neutrino is unrecorded. A measured recoil spectrum must therefore be compared with incident neutrino flux, energy distribution, acceptance, detection efficiency and backgrounds. A shape or rate tests a specified theoretical model only after these experimental ingredients have been supplied.

Use the current convention in the question, whose vertex prefactor is $g/(2\cos {\theta }_W)$. The neutral-current vector and axial couplings are thenFor a charged lepton, $T_3=-1/2$, $Q=-1$, givingFor an active neutrino, $T_3=1/2$, $Q=0$, so $c_V=c_A=1/2$. The right-handed weak singlet contribution is purely vectorlike in the charge term; combining it with the left-handed contribution gives precisely this Dirac-current form. These coefficients would be halved if the vertex prefactor were $g/\cos {\theta }_W$ instead.

Let $p=k+k^{\prime }$ be the Z boson momentum and $k,k^{\prime }$ the outgoing massless lepton momenta. The decay amplitude isUse the fermion spin sums $\sum u\bar{u}=/k$ and $\sum v\bar{v}=/k^{\prime }$. Anticommutation of ${\gamma }_5$ with the Dirac gamma matrices gives the symmetric part of the trace,The vector-axial cross term is antisymmetric in $\mu ,\nu$, and hence drops out of the massive vector polarization sum. The massless equations also give $p_{\mu }{L}^{\mu \nu }=0$: in the symmetric part, the first two contractions sum to $p^{\nu }k\cdot k^{\prime }$, canceling the last; the antisymmetric term vanishes because $p=k+k^{\prime }$. The longitudinal $p_{\mu }{p}_{\nu }/m_Z^2$ term therefore makes no contribution.

Since $2k\cdot k^{\prime }=m_Z^2$, contraction with $-g_{\mu \nu }$ gives $4(c_V^2+c_A^2)m_Z^2$. Thus the massless fermion Z decay spin sum, including all three initial polarizations, isTo use this fully summed expression for the decay width of one unpolarized Z boson, apply the massive-vector spin average, dividing by three. The width of each fixed polarization is the same after integration over all directions, so that procedure also gives the physical single-particle width. Omitting the division would sum the widths of three initial states.

For two massless distinguishable final particles, the two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space isConsequentlyThe tree-level electroweak symmetry breaking relation is $m_W=m_Z\cos {\theta }_W$. Combining it with the Fermi constant normalization givesFor an active neutrino, the vertex itself projects out inactive chiralities, so no additional helicity factor is needed. This is the tree-level massless leptonic Z decay width; lepton masses and radiative corrections have been excluded.

At momentum transfers small compared with $M_W$, the two weak charged current vertices each carry $g/(2\sqrt{2})$ when written with $(1-{\gamma }_5)$, and the W boson propagator reduces to a local factor proportional to $1/M_W^2$. Matching their product to the Fermi interaction gives, at tree level,The Fermi constant is thus determined by the electroweak coupling and symmetry-breaking scale; the four-fermion description is a low-energy effective interaction.

Only the cross term $J_L^{†}{J}_H$ can annihilate the pion and create the stated charged-lepton/antineutrino pair. Its leptonic matrix element is ${\bar{u}}_e(k){\gamma }^{\mu }(1-{\gamma }_5)v_{\nu }(q)$. Lorentz covariance permits a vacuum-to-spin-zero current matrix element only proportional to $p^{\mu }$. At rest this has only a temporal component. The vacuum is parity-even and the pion is parity-odd, while $V_H^0$ is parity-even, so $⟨0|V_H^0|\pi ⟩$ equals its own negative and vanishes. Lorentz covariance then makes the full vector matrix element vanish. The temporal axial current is parity-odd and is allowed: this is the vacuum-to-pseudoscalar current selection rule.

The minus sign in $J_H=V_H-A_H$ cancels the interaction's minus sign, up to an irrelevant common S-matrix phase. ThereforeThe pion decay constant convention here includes the given $\sqrt{2}$ in its current matrix element. Momentum conservation and the external Dirac equations give $p=k+q$, ${\bar{u}}_e/k=m_e{\bar{u}}_e$, $/q{v}_{\nu }=0$. Since $/q(1-{\gamma }_5)=(1+{\gamma }_5)/q$, the neutrino term vanishes andThis is helicity suppression: the amplitude vanishes in the zero charged-lepton-mass limit despite the larger available phase space.

For the spin sum, the Dirac adjoint of $1-{\gamma }_5$ is $1+{\gamma }_5$, and the completeness relations giveThe chiral projectors automatically eliminate the unused neutrino helicity when the full massless completeness relation is inserted. There is no initial spin average for a spin-zero pion.

In the pion rest frame, let $r=|\mathbf{k}|=|\mathbf{q}|$, $E=\sqrt{r^2+m_e^2}$. After integrating the spatial delta function and angles, the two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space becomesThe root is $r_{\ast }=(m_{\pi }^2-m_e^2)/(2m_{\pi })$ and $E_{\ast }=(m_{\pi }^2+m_e^2)/(2m_{\pi })$. The absolute derivative of the delta-function argument is $r_{\ast }/E_{\ast }+1=m_{\pi }/E_{\ast }$. Thus ${\Phi }_2=r_{\ast }/(4\pi m_{\pi })$. Multiplying by the spin sum and the initial factor $1/(2m_{\pi })$ yields the leptonic pseudoscalar decay widthIf the decay constant were instead defined by a matrix element $i{f}_{\pi }{p}^{\mu }$ without $\sqrt{2}$, then $f_{\pi }=\sqrt{2}{F}_{\pi }$ and the width coefficient would be $f_{\pi }^2/(8\pi )$; mixing these conventions would introduce a factor-of-two error.

The same derivation for a muon cancels the common hadronic and weak factors in the pion electron-to-muon decay ratio:The numerical value uses approximate masses $0.511,105.66,139.57$ MeV. Agreement with the corresponding Standard Model prediction tests lepton universality and the chiral, helicity-suppressing structure of the weak charged current, rather than the poorly calculable hadronic decay constant. A difference in the electron and muon weak couplings would multiply the ratio by their squared coupling ratio. Precision agreement must be assessed after radiative corrections, with matching photon-inclusive experimental definitions; the displayed tree-level ratio is not itself the radiatively corrected precision prediction.

Use natural units $\hslash =c=k_B=1$ and the unreduced Planck mass $M_P=G^{-1/2}$. Neutrino decoupling occurs when the weak interaction rate falls below the Hubble parameter. The weak-decoupling temperature estimate equates the given rate with the radiation-era expansion rate:Here $g_{\ast }$ counts the effective number of relativistic energy degrees of freedom, and the Fermi constant is $G_F\simeq 10^{-5}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-2}$. The omitted reaction-rate coefficients make this an order-of-magnitude estimate: decoupling occurs at a temperature of order one MeV.

The charge-conserving channel is $n+{\nu }_e\leftrightarrow p+e^{-}$, together with $p+{\bar{\nu }}_e\leftrightarrow n+e^{+}$. The positron sign in the printed neutron-capture channel violates electric charge conservation. Chemical equilibrium requires ${\mu }_n+{\mu }_{{\nu }_e}={\mu }_p+{\mu }_e$. Negligible lepton chemical potentials therefore give ${\mu }_n\simeq {\mu }_p$. Since neutrons and protons are nonrelativistic particles, their Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution givesBoth nucleons have two spin states, and their masses agree closely in the prefactor. Thus neutron-proton chemical equilibrium impliesThe heavier neutron is suppressed by a Boltzmann factor.

For the deuterium equilibrium abundance, retain the paper's convention $B=m_D-m_n-m_p<0$; the positive nuclear binding energy is ${\epsilon }_D=-B\simeq 2.22\mathrm{MeV}$. Chemical equilibrium of $n+p\leftrightarrow D+\gamma$ gives ${\mu }_D={\mu }_n+{\mu }_p$ because the equilibrium photon chemical potential vanishes. Using the nonrelativistic Maxwell--Boltzmann number density for each species and dividing givesHere $g_D=3$ and $g_n=g_p=2$. With the baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta =n_B/n_{\gamma }$, the photon number density $n_{\gamma }=2\zeta (3)T^3/{\pi }^2$, and $m_D\simeq 2m_N$, $m_n\simeq m_p\simeq m_N$, this becomesIn this convention $X_D=n_D/n_B$ counts nuclei, so its contribution to the fraction of baryons in deuterium is $2X_D$.

The deuterium bottleneck explains why helium-4 formation waits until $T$ is far below ${\epsilon }_D$. At higher temperature, there are vastly more photons than baryons; even the dilute energetic tail can destroy newly formed deuterium. A crude estimate balances ${\eta }^{-1}{e}^{-{\epsilon }_D/T}$ against one, giving $T\sim {\epsilon }_D/\log ({\eta }^{-1})\sim 0.1\mathrm{MeV}$ for $\eta$ of order $10^{-9}$. The power-law factors in the deuterium equilibrium abundance and the nuclear reaction rates refine this estimate. Once stable deuterium accumulates, further reactions can efficiently place nearly all surviving neutrons into helium-4.

Write $r_N=n_n/n_p$ at the onset of nuclear burning. Each helium-4 nucleus requires two neutrons and contains four baryons. Neutron-limited helium synthesis therefore gives the primordial helium mass fractionFor a realistic rough cosmological weak freeze-out estimate, $r_f$ is about $1/6$ and free-neutron decay after freeze-out reduces it to about $1/7$, giving roughly one quarter of the baryonic mass in helium-4. The survival relation that conserves baryon number is $X_n(T_N)=r_f(1+r_f{)}^{-1}{e}^{-\Delta t/{\tau }_n}$; the corresponding $r_N$ is $X_n/(1-X_n)$.

The rough neutrino decoupling rate by itself does not determine that one-quarter value. Substituting $T_d=1.8\mathrm{MeV}$ literally into $e^{-Q/T_d}$ would give $r\simeq 0.49$ and $Y_4\simeq 0.65$ before neutron decay. Neutron-proton chemical equilibrium persists to a lower temperature, approximately $0.7$--$0.8\mathrm{MeV}$ once the actual conversion rates are included. The rate scaling fixes the MeV scale; accurate abundances need the conversion coefficients and the delay through the deuterium bottleneck. This sequence is described in David Tong's discussion of nucleosynthesis.

Increasing $Q$ reduces the equilibrium neutron-to-proton ratio, so the primordial helium abundance decreases. Holding the freeze-out temperature $T_f$ and the decay survival factor fixed, the primordial helium response to the neutron-proton mass difference isFor $Q\simeq 1.29\mathrm{MeV}$ and $T_f=0.7$--$0.8\mathrm{MeV}$ this is about $0.85$--$0.87$, a reduction of roughly fifteen percent. A larger $Q$ also changes neutron decay and detailed weak rates; their quantitative effects require more microscopic information. The sign from the Boltzmann factor is already clear.

Adopt the phase convention $CP|K^0⟩=-|{\bar{K}}^0⟩$ and $CP|{\bar{K}}^0⟩=-|K^0⟩$. Changing both phases changes the convention for the mixing parameter, not physical predictions. The flavor contents are $K^0=d\bar{s}$ and ${\bar{K}}^0=s\bar{d}$. A pair of charged weak currents changes strangeness by two units through the following box contractions, with $u_i,u_j=u,c,t$ summed over.

The drawing uses unitary gauge: the W boson gauge-boson propagator contains its longitudinal part. In a gauge of a renormalizable quantum field theory, charged Goldstone boson boxes must also be included to obtain the same gauge-independent result. The external lines represent the valence quarks; the meson matrix element also contains strong interaction binding effects.

Put ${\lambda }_i=V_{is}^{\ast }{V}_{id}$, $x_i=m_i^2/m_W^2$ and $P_L=(1-{\gamma }^5)/2$. The charged weak box contribution to kaon mixing has the effective four-fermion interaction structureHere $G_F$ is the Fermi constant, $V$ is the CKM matrix, and $S$ is a dimensionless loop function from a Feynman integral; the estimate suppresses convention-dependent numerical factors. Four weak interaction Feynman vertices and a one-loop Feynman integral give the coupling and loop order suppression. Unitarity of the CKM matrix gives ${\sum }_i{\lambda }_i=0$, so the GIM mechanism cancels the mass-independent part. With a negligible up quark mass, the leading charm quark term has $S(x_c,x_c)\sim x_c$. Define $f_K$ by $⟨0|\bar{s}{\gamma }_{\mu }{\gamma }^{5}d|K^0(p)⟩=i{f}_K{p}_{\mu }$. Estimating the hadronic matrix element by $f_K^2{m}_K{B}_K$, with the dimensionless kaon bag parameter $B_K$ of order unity, givesThe hadronic normalization includes division by $2m_K$ when relativistically normalized states are converted to the effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing. Since $|V_{cs}^{\ast }{V}_{cd}|\simeq \sin {\theta }_C\cos {\theta }_C$, the Cabibbo suppression is explicit. Illustrative scales $G_F\sim 10^{-5}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-2}$, $m_c\sim 1\mathrm{GeV}$, $f_K\sim 0.1\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_K\sim 0.5\mathrm{GeV}$ give an order $10^{-16}$ to $10^{-15}\mathrm{GeV}$ estimate. The full sum includes charm quark-top quark and top quark-top quark terms, important for CP violation; long-distance strong interaction contributions prevent this dimensional estimate from being a precision prediction. A meson matrix element necessarily needs hadronic input in addition to electroweak parameters.

For the decaying kaon system write $H^{\prime }=M-i\Gamma /2$, where $M$ and $\Gamma$ are Hermitian matrices. The entries denoted $M_{ij}$ in the question are entries of this effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing; they need not themselves form a Hermitian matrix. CPT invariance equates the diagonal masses and diagonal decay widths, givingOne can see why there is no complex conjugation on the right as follows. In the flavor subspace let $J=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$ and represent the antiunitary CPT operation by $J$ followed by complex conjugation. CPT changes a projected forward propagator into its adjoint. Indeed, if $P$ projects onto the flavor subspace and $H_{\mathrm{full}}$ is the Hermitian microscopic generator, its invariance and the antiunitary reversal of $i$ give $\Theta P{e}^{-i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P{\Theta }^{-1}=P{e}^{+i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P=(P{e}^{-i{H}_{\mathrm{full}}t}P{)}^{†}$. In the time-independent two-state approximation, the effective generator this means $J{H^{\prime }}^{\ast }J={H^{\prime }}^{†}$, whose diagonal entries give $(H_{22}^{\prime }{)}^{\ast }=(H_{11}^{\prime }{)}^{\ast }$; the off-diagonal entries impose no further condition. Equivalently, apply CPT separately to the dispersive and absorptive Hermitian matrices. Treating the decaying effective Hamiltonian for neutral-meson mixing as a Hermitian matrix would incorrectly discard the absorptive part.

In the chosen flavor phase convention CP is represented by $-J$. Its invariance requires $J{H}^{\prime }J=H^{\prime }$. Thus it gives diagonal equality and additionallyThe normalized CP eigenstates areApplying CP directly gives eigenvalues $+1$ and $-1$ respectively.

Now use CPT to put $H^{\prime }=\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& a\end{array}\right)$ and take correlated square roots $\alpha =\sqrt{b}$, $\beta =\sqrt{c}$. Its characteristic polynomial equation is $(a-\mu {)}^2-bc=0$, and direct multiplication showsExpressing these two eigenvectors in the CP eigenstate basis gives, respectively, coefficients proportional to $(\alpha +\beta ,\alpha -\beta )$ and $(\alpha -\beta ,\alpha +\beta )$. Therefore the kaon CP mixing parameter isand, because the CP eigenstate basis is orthonormal, the normalized states at production areThe kaon mixing square-root branch convention correlates the roots continuously with the limit of conserved CP $b=c$, where $\alpha =\beta$ and $ϵ=0$. Reversing one root interchanges the two eigenstates. The labels short and long are fixed by their decay widths: their complex eigenvalues are ${\mu }_{S,L}=m_{S,L}-i{\Gamma }_{S,L}/2$, and subsequent evolution supplies $e^{-i{\mu }_{S,L}t}$. The displayed formula assumes nonzero mixing and $\alpha +\beta \ne 0$, as in the physical kaon system; degenerate or defective matrices require a separate limiting treatment.

Work in natural units $\hslash =c=k_B=1$, at temperatures far below the $W$-boson mass but of order or above the electron mass. The Fermi interaction then supplies a local four-fermion amplitude. The Fermi constant has dimension energy${}^{-2}$. In scattering of a thermal lepton from a nonrelativistic nucleon, the nucleon current matrix element has size $m_N$, while the lepton current has size $T$. Thus $\mathcal{M}\sim G_F{m}_{N}T$. The two-body relativistic scattering cross-section contains the kinematic factor $s^{-1}\sim m_N^{-2}$; when the final and initial lepton energies are comparable, their momentum ratio is of order one. Consequently $\sigma \sim |\mathcal{M}{|}^2/m_N^2\sim G_F^2{T}^2$. This estimates temperatures above the electron mass and mass-splitting thresholds; those scales only affect the dimensionless rate function near freeze-out.

The light leptons in the thermal bath have number density $n\sim T^3$ and speed of order unity. Their conversion rate per nucleon is thereforeFor example, $n+{\nu }_e\leftrightarrow p+e^{-}$ and $n+e^{+}\leftrightarrow p+{\bar{\nu }}_e$ change the neutron-to-proton ratio. The bath density here is the lepton density, not the much smaller baryon density. Dimensionless weak couplings, phase-space integrals and the several reaction channels set a numerical coefficient. Electron masses and the neutron-proton splitting also become important for a precision rate near cosmological weak freeze-out.

Use Minkowski metric signature $+---$ and natural units. With no lepton mixing, choose the weak charged current conventionIts conjugate convention exchanges $J$ and $J^{†}$ without changing the interaction. The relevant four-fermion interaction gives the muon decay amplitude, up to an overall phase,Here $G_F$ is the Fermi constant; the factors $1-{\gamma }_5$ are twice the left chiral projector, so there is no additional factor of two to insert.

For the final-spin sum let ${\rho }_{\mu }=(/p+m)(1+{\gamma }_5/s)/2$, where $m=m_{\mu }$. It already describes the specified initial polarization; there is no further initial-spin average. The two gamma matrix traces areThe electron-mass term vanishes in its chiral trace. In the muon trace, anticommutation with ${\gamma }_5$ givesFor the chiral fermion trace contraction, defineThe supplied trace conventions imply $L^{\alpha \beta }=8K^{\alpha \beta }(k,q)$ and $H_{\alpha \beta }=4K_{\alpha \beta }(q^{\prime },r)$, where $r=p-ms$. The factor four in the second trace follows from the polarization projector. The symmetric parts contract to $2[(a\cdot c)(b\cdot d)+(a\cdot d)(b\cdot c)]$. The Levi-Civita symbol contraction, including $i^2=-1$, contributes $2[(a\cdot c)(b\cdot d)-(a\cdot d)(b\cdot c)]$. Mixed symmetric-antisymmetric contractions vanish. Thus $K^{\alpha \beta }(a,b)K_{\alpha \beta }(c,d)=4(a\cdot c)(b\cdot d)$, and

Now neglect $m_e$ as well. Put $Q=p-k$ and $c=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\cdot \mathbf{s}$. The given moment integral over two-neutrino relativistic two-body phase space yieldsIn the muon rest frame, $k\cdot Q=mE$, $k\cdot r=mE(1+c)$, $r\cdot Q=m^2-mE(1+c)$ and $Q^2=m^2-2mE$. Substitution givesCombining this with the Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure, whose one-particle denominator is $(2\pi {)}^{3}2E$, and $d^{3}k=E^{2}dEd\Omega$, gives the polarized muon decay distributionConsequently $C=-2$, $D=-2$, $E=1$. Integration over the electron direction removes the polarization term, and ${\int }_0^1{x}^2(3-2x)dx=1/2$, recovering $\Gamma =G_F^2{m}^5/(192{\pi }^3)$.

The spin vector is axial and the momentum direction is polar: under parity, $\mathbf{s}$ stays unchanged while $\hat{\mathbf{k}}$ reverses. Their scalar product therefore changes sign. Its nonzero coefficient demonstrates parity violation in polarized muon decay, arising from the left-chiral weak charged current. At the upper endpoint the negative muon's electron is preferentially emitted opposite the spin, providing a sign check on the result.

Use the metric $g^{\mu \nu }=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$ and the usual Dirac basis, with $({\gamma }^0{)}^{†}={\gamma }^0$ and $({\gamma }^i{)}^{†}=-{\gamma }^i$. In this solution the sign of the chirality matrix is the one specified in the paper, ${\gamma }^5=-i{\gamma }^0{\gamma }^1{\gamma }^2{\gamma }^3$. Define $t_0=1$ and $t_i=-1$, with no summation in componentwise transformation formulas.

Complex conjugation changes the explicit $-i$ to $+i$. Three spatial gamma matrices each contribute another minus sign, soAlso $({\gamma }^5{)}^2=1$ and $\{{\gamma }^5,{\gamma }^{\mu }\}=0$ by the Clifford algebra.

The quantum time-reversal operator is antiunitary: it conjugates numerical coefficients, including the Dirac spinors and plane-wave exponentials in the mode expansion of a Dirac field. To fix the spin phase explicitly, put ${ϵ}_s=(-1{)}^{1/2-s}$ and useThis convention gives ${\hat{T}}^2=-1$ on a one-fermion state, since ${ϵ}_s{ϵ}_{-s}=-1$. In the transformed expansion, change variables from $(p,s)$ to $(p_T,-s)$. The Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure is unchanged, and $p_T\cdot x=-p\cdot x_T$. The coefficient of $b^s(p)e^{-ip\cdot x_T}$ is thereforeThe same calculation applies to the antiparticle coefficient. Thus, with this explicitly fixed spin convention,The spin phase in the Dirac time-reversal matrix matters here: a common change of the one-particle time-reversal phase replaces $B$ by $-B$; the phase-independent relation is $B\propto {\gamma }^{5}C$. It changes neither the defining conjugation property nor any bilinear result below. Normalize $B$ to be a unitary matrix. In the Dirac basis, ${\gamma }^0$ is real and commutes with $B$, so transforming the Dirac adjoint givesHere complex conjugation of the matrix defining the Dirac adjoint is essential. An explicit realization consistent with the sign of ${\gamma }^5$ used here is $C=i{\gamma }^2{\gamma }^0$ and $B={\gamma }^1{\gamma }^3$; it has $B^{-1}=-B$, so conjugation by $B$ and by $B^{-1}$ coincides. The usual changes of Dirac spinor basis by unitary matrices carry the adjoint and time-reversal matrix with them.

For the charge-conjugation matrix, the gamma matrix adjoint and transpose identities give ${\gamma }^{\mu T}=t_{\mu }{\gamma }^{\mu \ast }$. Consequently $B{\gamma }^{\mu T}{B}^{-1}={\gamma }^{\mu }$. Since $C={\gamma }^{5}B$ in the chosen phase convention,This proof uses a temporal Hermitian matrix and spatial skew-Hermitian matrices explicitly; the transpose identity is preserved when $C$ is transformed appropriately with the gamma matrices.

For the Fermi interaction, let $V_{pn}^{\mu }=\bar{p}{\gamma }^{\mu }n$ and $A_{pn}^{\mu }=\bar{p}{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^{5}n$. In the displayed Dirac basis, the inverse version of the conjugation relation also holds. Antiunitarity, $B^{-1}{\gamma }^{\mu \ast }B=t_{\mu }{\gamma }^{\mu }$ and $B^{-1}{\gamma }^{5\ast }B={\gamma }^5$ giveThe leptonic weak charged current has the same component signs. In the contraction of leptonic and hadronic currents, the two $t_{\mu }$ factors cancel. Its two independent operators thus keep their form while their coefficients become $g_V^{\ast }$ and $g_A^{\ast }$. The Hermitian-conjugate term transforms separately; its presence does not remove a relative complex phase between the vector and axial couplings.