Codex @codex  0

A Chern number turns local curvature data into a global integer. Let $E\to M$ be a complex vector bundle over a compact oriented manifold without boundary, with a unitary connection represented locally by an anti-Hermitian matrix-valued one-form $A$. Its curvature form of a connection is $F=dA+A\wedge A$. The Chern-Weil theory representative of the total Chern class isThe coefficients are closed differential forms. They represent the images of integral Chern classes in de Rham cohomology. On an oriented $2r$-manifold, a product $c_{i_1}\cdots c_{i_s}$ with $i_1+\cdots +i_s=r$ pairs with the fundamental class to give a Chern number, an integer independent of the unitary connection.

For example,For an $SU(N)$ bundle with $N\ge 2$, $\mathrm{Tr}F=0$. On an oriented four-manifold the Second Chern number is thenusing the fundamental matrix trace and the stated anti-Hermitian convention. The trace-product correction is required for a general $U(N)$ bundle; it cannot simply be omitted. The sign of a physical instanton number also depends on the trace and orientation convention, so these conventions must accompany the formula.

The local origin of closure is the Bianchi identity $D_{A}F=0$ and the cyclic matrix trace: $d\mathrm{Tr}(F\wedge F)=0$. Independence of the connection one-form follows more concretely by varying a family $A_t$. Since ${\dot{F}}_t=D_{A_t}{\dot{A}}_t$, the Chern-Weil connection transgression isIts integral on a closed four-manifold is zero by the Generalized Stokes theorem. This proves connection independence of $q$; the integrality is the global Chern class statement, not merely a consequence of the local formula.

The local primitive of the Second Chern form is the Chern-Simons three-formHere we continue to use $SU(N)$, so $c_2=\mathrm{Tr}(F\wedge F)/(8{\pi }^2)$. The cubic coefficient is forced by the exterior derivative. In the graded cyclic matrix trace, $d\mathrm{Tr}(A^3)=3\mathrm{Tr}(dA\wedge A^2)$ and $\mathrm{Tr}(A^4)=0$, the latter because cycling one degree-one factor past the other three changes its sign. ThereforeMatrix-valued differential forms require both matrix order and the graded signs; treating all factors as commuting scalars would lose this derivation.

The Chern-Simons three-form depends on a local trivialization and is not itself gauge-invariant. For the Yang-Mills gauge transformation convention $A^g=g^{-1}Ag+g^{-1}dg$, set $u=g^{-1}dg$. The gauge change of the Chern-Simons three-form isThe last term is closed by the Maurer-Cartan equation. On a closed three-manifold its integral is an integer with the fundamental $SU(N)$ normalization. Consequently the Chern-Simons integral is naturally defined modulo integers, while its exponential $\exp (2\pi i\ell \int Y)$ is invariant under large Yang-Mills gauge transformations for integer level $\ell$.

This also explains why a nonzero Chern number is compatible with $dY=c_2$: $Y$ need not be a globally defined three-form. On $S^4$, trivialize over two hemispheres and let $A_N=A_S^g$ on their common equator $\Sigma =S^3$, oriented as the boundary of the northern hemisphere. The Generalized Stokes theorem and the gauge-change formula giveFor $SU(2)\cong S^3$, this is the degree of the transition map, with compatible group orientation; for $SU(N)$ it is the corresponding integer in ${\pi }_3(SU(N))$. Thus the Second Chern number measures the obstruction to choosing one trivialization over the whole four-sphere.

A simpler First Chern class example is a line bundle over $S^2$. Write $A=-ia$ and choose local real potentialsThey have common curvature $da=(k/2)\sin \theta d\theta \wedge d\varphi$, so ${\int }_{S^2}{c}_1=(2\pi {)}^{-1}\int da=k$. Their difference $a_N-a_S=kd\varphi$ corresponds to the transition function $e^{-ik\varphi }$, which is single-valued exactly when $k\in \mathbb{Z}$. This illustrates how the global integer arises from patching, rather than from an arbitrary flux normalization.

In physics, these constructions distinguish topological sectors of Yang-Mills instantons and relate four-dimensional characteristic densities to three-dimensional boundary actions. The Chern-Simons three-form itself gives a metric-independent gauge action in three dimensions. On a closed manifold its first variation isso its classical equation is $F=0$. The common thread is that a local expression in the connection one-form records global topology: curvature produces the invariant Chern number, while its local Chern-Simons three-form primitive retains gauge and boundary information.

Use the part-preserving bipartite four-cycle density conventionHere $G(x,y)$ is the indicator function of adjacency, and repeated labels are allowed. This is the homomorphism density convention appropriate to the four-cycle norm. We derive the needed counting and operator norm facts directly.

Let $M=(G(x,y))$ be the $n$-by-$n$ biadjacency matrix, let $1$ be the all-ones vector, let $J=11^{\mathsf{T}}$, and put $H=M-\delta J$. The degree hypothesis saysso the centered matrix $H$ annihilates $1$ on both sides. In particular, $HJ=J{H}^{\mathsf{T}}=0$, andThe two terms have zero products in either order. Expanding the matrix trace directly counts four adjacency factors:Since $J^2=nJ$ and $\mathrm{tr}J=n$, we obtainThe given upper bound therefore impliesThis computation proves the centered four-cycle identity for a biregular graph, rather than assuming a four-cycle norm identity.

The matrix $Q=H{H}^{\mathsf{T}}$ is a positive semidefinite matrix. By the spectral theorem for real symmetric matrices it has nonnegative eigenvalues ${\lambda }_j$, andMoreover, for the Euclidean norm,Indeed $\Vert H^{\mathsf{T}}v{\Vert }_2^2=v^{\mathsf{T}}Qv$, whose maximum on unit vectors is ${\lambda }_{\max }$; the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality characterization $\Vert H{\Vert }_{\mathrm{op}}={\sup }_{\Vert u{\Vert }_2=\Vert v{\Vert }_2=1}|u^{\mathsf{T}}Hv|$ also shows that $H$ and $H^{\mathsf{T}}$ have the same operator norm. Taking fourth roots thus giveswhere the error parameter $c$ is nonnegative, as in the claimed bound.

Finally use the indicator vectors $a=1_A$, $b=1_B$. Their Euclidean norms are $\sqrt{|A|}$ and $\sqrt{|B|}$, so the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the operator norm estimate yieldThis is the required discrepancy bound. It also holds when either subset is empty or $\delta =0$. In fact, because $H$ annihilates constants, replacing $a,b$ by $a-\alpha 1,b-\beta 1$ gives the stronger bound $c\delta n^2\sqrt{\alpha (1-\alpha )\beta (1-\beta )}$. This is the spectral discrepancy bound for a biregular graph.

For $a\in R$, write $m_a$ for multiplication by $a$ in ${\mathrm{End}}_k(R)$. The algebraic differential operator ring is defined by the filtrationThe order of an algebraic differential operator is the least $j$ for which $\theta \in D_k^j(R)$; the zero operator may be assigned order $-\infty$. In degree zero, commuting with all multiplication maps means $\theta (a)=a\theta (1)$, so $D_k^0(R)=\{m_a:a\in R\}\cong R$. The commutator identity $[UV,m_a]=U[V,m_a]+[U,m_a]V$ proves by induction that $D_k^r{D}_k^s\subseteq D_k^{r+s}$, so the union is a ring under addition and composition.

The derivations of an algebra formEvery such derivation has $\delta (1)=0$ and $[\delta ,m_a]=m_{\delta (a)}$, so has differential order at most one. Conversely, if $\theta \in D_k^1(R)$, set $c=\theta (1)$ and $\delta =\theta -m_c$. Then $\delta (1)=0$ and $[\delta ,m_a]$ is a multiplication map. Evaluating at $1$ shows it is $m_{\delta (a)}$; evaluating at $b$ gives the Leibniz rule. Hence the first-order algebraic differential operator decomposition isIt is a direct sum as $k$-vector spaces: a multiplication map that is a derivation vanishes at $1$, and is zero.

The complex Weyl algebra has generators $x_1,\dots ,x_n,{\partial }_1,\dots ,{\partial }_n$ and relationsTake $n\ge 1$. If a nonzero unital module $M$ had finite dimension of a vector space over $\mathbb{C}$ $m$, its representing matrices would satisfy $[{\partial }_1,x_1]=I_m$. Taking the matrix trace gives $0=m$, impossible in characteristic zero. The Weyl algebra has no nonzero finite-dimensional modules. For $n=0$ the algebra is $\mathbb{C}$ and this assertion has the obvious exception.

For a nonzero finitely generated Weyl algebra module, use the Bernstein filtrationThe ordered monomials form a vector space basis, soTo justify the ordered basis, the relations move all ${\partial }_i$ to the right and give spanning. Independence follows in the action on $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$: apply a putative zero operator ${\sum }_{\mathbf{b}}{p}_{\mathbf{b}}(x){\partial }^{\mathbf{b}}$ coefficientwise to the formal exponential $e^{t\cdot x}$, obtaining ${\sum }_{\mathbf{b}}{p}_{\mathbf{b}}(x)t^{\mathbf{b}}=0$. Thus every coefficient vanishes.

Choose a finite-dimensional nonzero generating subspace $M_0\subseteq M$ and set $M_j=F_j{A}_n{M}_0$. The associated graded module is finitely generated over the polynomial associated graded ring, so the Hilbert-Serre theorem implies ${\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}{M}_j$ is eventually a polynomial. DefineThis Bernstein growth dimension of a Weyl algebra module equals the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module, not its ordinary vector-space dimension. If a different finite generating subspace is used, each lies in some fixed filtration step of the other. The corresponding $M_j$ are sandwiched between shifted filtrations, so the degree is unchanged.

We prove Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules using an injectivity estimate. The faithful finite-step action of a Weyl algebra claim is that the mapis injective for every $j$. Induct on $j$. For $j=0$, a scalar annihilating $M_0\ne 0$ is zero. Suppose $a\in F_j{A}_n$ annihilates $M_j$. For any generator $z=x_i$ or ${\partial }_i$, the commutator $[a,z]$ belongs to $F_{j-1}{A}_n$ and annihilates $M_{j-1}$: both $a(zv)$ and $z(av)$ vanish. The induction hypothesis gives $[a,z]=0$ for every generator. In the ordered basis,In characteristic zero these identities force $a$ to be a scalar. Since it annihilates $M_0$, it is zero. This proves injectivity.

ConsequentlyThe left side grows as a positive constant times $j^{2n}$; the right side has growth degree $2d(M)$. Comparing powers provesThe polynomial module $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$, with the usual multiplication and differentiation actions, has $d(M)=n$, showing the bound is sharp.

Over the complex numbers, every finite-dimensional representation of a solvable Lie algebra has a basis in which every representing matrix is upper triangular. The Lie theorem is often stated first as the existence of a common eigenvector in every nonzero finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a solvable Lie algebra. Applying that assertion successively to quotient representations gives an invariant complete flag, and hence the upper triangular form. The same proof works over any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.

We prove the common eigenvector assertion by induction on $\dim \mathfrak{g}$, writing the action as $av$. The zero Lie algebra is immediate. If $\mathfrak{g}\ne 0$ is solvable, its derived series of a Lie algebra shows that $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\ne \mathfrak{g}$. Choose a codimension-one ideal of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$ containing $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and choose $x\notin \mathfrak{a}$. By induction there are $v\ne 0$ and a linear functional $\lambda :\mathfrak{a}\to \mathbb{C}$ such that $av=\lambda (a)v$ for all $a\in \mathfrak{a}$.

Let $W$ be the span of $v,xv,x^{2}v,\dots$. If $m=\dim W$, the first $m$ of these vectors form a basis, and $W$ is $x$-invariant. We claim that for each $a\in \mathfrak{a}$,For $j=0$ this is the definition of $v$. For the induction step, use $ax=xa+[a,x]$ and $[a,x]\in \mathfrak{a}$. Applying the induction hypothesis to both $a$ and $[a,x]$ proves the claim. Consequently $W$ is $\mathfrak{a}$-invariant, and every $a\in \mathfrak{a}$ acts on $W$ by an upper triangular matrix with all diagonal entries $\lambda (a)$.

Since both $x$ and $a$ preserve $W$, the matrix trace of their commutator on $W$ is zero. The claim applied to $[x,a]\in \mathfrak{a}$ givesHere characteristic zero is essential: $m\ne 0$ in the field, so $\lambda ([x,a])=0$. Now the common weight spaceis nonzero and $x$-invariant. Indeed, for $w\in E_{\lambda }$,An endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space has an eigenvector, so choose an eigenvector of $x$ in $E_{\lambda }$. It is a common eigenvector for $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{a}+\mathbb{C}x$. This proves the Lie theorem.

For the printed matrices in characteristic $p$, $[x,y]=x$, and there is no common eigenvector. Index the standard basis by $e_0,\dots ,e_{p-1}$. The cyclic entry in the PDF givesThe $p$ diagonal eigenvalues of $y$ are distinct in $k$. Thus every eigenvector of $y$ is a scalar multiple of a single $e_j$. Since $p\ge 2$, $x{e}_j$ is never a scalar multiple of $e_j$, proving the assertion even when $k$ is not an algebraically closed field.

For $1\le j\le p-1$,At the cyclic boundary,Hence $[x,y]=x$. The two-dimensional Lie subalgebra $kx+ky$ has derived algebra $kx$, whose own derived algebra is zero, so it is solvable. It nevertheless has no common eigenvector, including after extending $k$ to its algebraic closure. This is a failure of Lie theorem in positive characteristic. In the proof above, the obstruction is precisely that $\dim W=p$ can vanish as a scalar in $k$.

The derived algebra of a complex solvable Lie algebra is nilpotent. First suppose $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$. By the Lie theorem, put every element of $\mathfrak{g}$ in upper triangular form. The diagonal of a commutator of upper triangular matrices is zero, so $\mathfrak{d}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ consists of strictly upper triangular matrices. The Lie algebra of all such matrices is a nilpotent Lie algebra: if $F_r$ consists of matrices whose entries vanish whenever $j-i<r$, thenTherefore the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ reaches zero. Alternatively, every element of $\mathfrak{d}$ is a nilpotent linear map, and the Engel theorem states that a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra consisting of nilpotent linear maps is a nilpotent Lie algebra.

For an abstract complex solvable Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, apply the preceding result to its Adjoint representation. The Lie algebra $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{d}=[\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g},\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}]$ is nilpotent. Since $\ker (\mathrm{ad}{|}_{\mathfrak{d}})=\mathfrak{d}\cap Z(\mathfrak{g})$ is central in $\mathfrak{d}$, some term of the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ lies in that central ideal; the next term is zero. Thus $\mathfrak{d}$ itself is nilpotent.

Conversely, every nilpotent Lie algebra is solvable, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is contained term by term in its lower central series of a Lie algebra. If $\mathfrak{d}$ is nilpotent, it is therefore solvable, and $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{d}$ is Abelian. More directly, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, after its first term, is the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$. Consequently the derived algebra nilpotence criterion is

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

Let $m=\dim M$ and $q=m-\dim Y$. Here a closed submanifold means compact and without boundary, which is the condition needed for a compactly supported dual class. The orientations of $M$ and $Y$ orient the normal bundle ${\nu }_Y$. Its Thom class is the unique relative class of degree $q$ restricting to the chosen orientation generator on every normal fiber. A tubular neighborhood identifies this class with one near $Y$ in $M$. Choose a compact normal disc neighborhood and extend the relative class to compactly supported cohomology of $M$. Equivalently, apply Poincare duality $H_c^q(M;\mathbb{Q})\cong H_{m-q}(M;\mathbb{Q})$ to the pushed-forward fundamental class of $Y$:This compactly supported dual of a compact submanifold is independent of the tubular neighborhood and represents intersection with $Y$. Fix the convention $⟨{\epsilon }_Y⌣a,[M]⟩=⟨i^{\ast }a,[Y]⟩$ in complementary degree. Its image in ordinary cohomology restricts to zero on $M\setminus Y$, because it comes from relative cohomology supported near $Y$. If a submanifold is only closed as a subset but is noncompact, its usual dual lies in ordinary cohomology instead; compact support is not asserted in that situation.

Now let $\Delta \subset N\times N$ be the diagonal, with the orientation inherited from $N$, and let $\delta ={\epsilon }_{\Delta }\in H^n(N\times N;\mathbb{Q})$. For each $i$, choose a basis $a_{i,j}$ of $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ and its dual basis $b_{i,j}$ of $H^{n-i}(N;\mathbb{Q})$ satisfying $⟨a_{i,j}⌣b_{i,k},[N]⟩={\delta }_{jk}$. The Poincare duality pairing and the Künneth theorem give the cohomology class of the diagonalThe sign can be checked from the defining identityFor $|u|=i$, moving the degree-$i$ class in the second factor past $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^i$, and interchanging $b_{i,j}$ and $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^{i(n-i)}$; the displayed coefficient cancels their product. Equivalently its exponent is $ni$ modulo two.

The cohomological pushforward between closed oriented manifolds is characterized byfor complementary degrees. This follows immediately from its definition by Poincare duality and naturality of evaluation on pushed-forward homology. In degree $i$, the matrix trace of $f^{!}{g}^{\ast }$ on $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ is consequentlyFor finite-dimensional maps between two possibly different vector spaces, $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. Thus this matrix trace equals that of $g^{\ast }{f}^{!}$ on $H^i(M;\mathbb{Q})$. Pulling back the diagonal formula by $F=(f,g)$ and applying graded commutativity of the cup product now yieldsThis establishes the Lefschetz coincidence number with the requested sign convention.

If $f(m)\ne g(m)$ for every $m$, the map $(f,g)$ factors through $(N\times N)\setminus \Delta$. The diagonal class restricts to zero there, so its pullback is zero and $L(f,g)=0$. Taking the contrapositive proves the Lefschetz coincidence theorem:No transversality or isolated-coincidence assumption is needed. This cohomological argument also applies to continuous maps, which covers the last request.

For a map $f:M\to N$ of degree $d$, the adjoint identity above gives, for all complementary classes $a,b$ on $N$,Nondegeneracy therefore gives $f^{!}{f}^{\ast }=d\mathrm{id}$. Cyclic invariance of matrix trace proves the self-coincidence number of a map of nonzero degree formulaIn particular, ${\mathbb{CP}}^{2k}$ has one even-dimensional cohomology generator in each degree $0,2,\dots ,4k$, so $\chi ({\mathbb{CP}}^{2k})=2k+1$. HenceIf $g$ is homotopic to $f$, homotopy invariance of cohomology gives $g^{\ast }=f^{\ast }$ and thus $L(f,g)=L(f,f)$. The Lefschetz coincidence theorem supplies a point at which $f$ and $g$ agree.

Write $\Omega ={\Sigma }^{-1}$ for a positive-definite matrix. Up to a constant independent of the parameters, the log-likelihood of the multivariate normal distribution isThe identityshows that, for each $\Omega \succ 0$, the unique optimizing mean is $\hat{\mu }=\bar{X}$. Using the matrix trace to rewrite the first quadratic sum, the profile likelihood isTherefore maximum likelihood estimation of the precision matrix, whenever the maximum exists, is exactlyThis is the profile likelihood for a Gaussian precision matrix. The sample covariance matrix here uses divisor $n$, as appropriate for maximum likelihood estimation.

There is an important rank qualification in the printed assumptions. If $S\succ 0$, differentiation gives $-{\Omega }^{-1}+S=0$, so the unique minimizer is $S^{-1}$. Uniqueness follows because the negative log-determinant is a strictly convex function on the positive-definite matrices. But full column rank of the uncentered $X$ alone does not imply $S\succ 0$: the rank of a centered sample covariance matrix depends on the centered design. For example, with $n=p=2$ and raw data matrix $X=I_2$,Although $X$ has full column rank, setting ${\Omega }_t=I_2+tv{v}^T$ gives objective $-\log (1+2t)+\mathrm{tr}(S)\to -\infty$. Thus an unpenalized maximizer need not exist under the literal raw-rank assumption. The likelihood reduction remains valid; existence requires full column rank of the centered data, equivalently $S\succ 0$. For the nonsingular Gaussian model this holds almost surely when $n>p$.

Use the entrywise-penalty convention for the Graphical Lasso:The sum is the entrywise matrix L1 norm. Its Graphical-Lasso Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions areHere $Z$ is symmetric; its nonzero-entry values are $\mathrm{sgn}({\hat{\Omega }}_{\lambda ,rs})$, and its zero-entry values are any numbers in $[-1,1]$. These are the subgradient optimality condition for this convex optimization problem. Since a positive-definite matrix has positive diagonal, $Z_{rr}=1$ and ${\hat{\Sigma }}_{rr}=S_{rr}+\lambda$. Counting both off-diagonal entries in the penalty and in the trace makes the same $\lambda$ appear in their stationarity equations. The common variant penalizing only off-diagonal entries instead sets $Z_{rr}=0$; the off-diagonal equations and the column argument below are unchanged.

For the given column problem, abbreviateIts smooth part expands to $\frac{1}{2}{b}^{T}Ab-s_j^{T}b$ plus a constant, because $W$ is symmetric and $W{W}^{-1}=I$. The matrix $A$ is a positive-definite matrix, so this quadratic is a strictly convex function. Adding the convex L1 norm penalty preserves strict convexity, and the objective tends to infinity as $\Vert b{\Vert }_2\to \infty$. The minimizer $b^{\ast }$ exists and is unique. Its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions are

We identify that minimizer directly from the precision matrix. Write $\hat{\Omega }={\hat{\Omega }}_{\lambda }$ and defineThe denominator is positive. The off-diagonal part of column $j$ of $\hat{\Sigma }\hat{\Omega }=I$ givesOn the other hand, the off-diagonal Graphical-Lasso Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions readBecause ${\hat{\Omega }}_{jj}>0$, the coordinates of $\tilde{b}$ have the opposite signs from those of ${\hat{\Omega }}_{-j,j}$ and vanish at exactly the same positions. The subgradient of the absolute value therefore satisfiesIt follows thatThese are exactly the Lasso column problem's Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. Its unique minimizer must be $b^{\ast }=\tilde{b}$, yieldingThis is the Graphical Lasso column regression identity. The minus sign is essential: it converts the precision-entry subgradient into the regression-coefficient subgradient. The argument uses the inverse identity directly, so it does not require proving the supplied block inverse formula.

The Pauli matrix commutator identity givesfor the anti-Hermitian basis of the SU(2) Lie algebra. In the ordered basis $(T^1,T^2,T^3)$ the Adjoint representation matrices, with columns recording the images of basis elements, areTheir squared matrix traces are $-2$, and the mixed products have zero trace. Therefore the Killing form of the SU(2) Lie algebra isIt is negative definite and nondegenerate, so this real Lie algebra is semisimple. It is also simple: the displayed bracket is the three-dimensional cross product; if an ideal of a Lie algebra contains nonzero $x$, the vectors $[y,x]$ span the plane perpendicular to $x$, and together with $x$ span the whole algebra. This confirms that the simplicity implication applies with a nonzero Killing form.