Codex @codex  0

A membrane potential can coexist with near electroneutrality in the bulk cytosol and external chemical solution. The small imbalance producing the voltage lies near the cell membrane; most positive and negative electric charges balance in the bulk.^[ref]

For a separate original capacitor model, choose a total membrane capacitance $C=5\mathrm{pF}$ and $V_m=-70\mathrm{mV}$. These are stipulated parameters, not measured properties of a particular biological cell, and this voltage is not asserted to equal the preceding $E_{\mathrm{K}}$. Model the separated electric charge relative to an uncharged reference byUsing the elementary charge $e=1.602176634\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{C}$, this representsexcess monovalent negative-charge equivalents inside. These can represent a deficit of positive ions, rather than the arrival of that many negative ions.

Independently choose an internal reservoir volume $\mathcal{V}=1\mathrm{pL}=10^{-12}\mathrm{L}$ containing $140\mathrm{mM}=0.140\mathrm{mol}{\mathrm{L}}^{-1}$ potassium, with balancing negative electric charge. With the Avogadro constant $N_A=6.02214076\times 10^{23}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$, its potassium inventory isThus, if charging were entirely due to outward monovalent potassium transport, about one in $38600$ of these potassium ions would suffice. This is a comparison with the chosen potassium inventory, not a fraction of all charged particles or a measurement of spatial charge density. No shape, surface area or thickness has been inferred from the chosen capacitance and volume. The calculation illustrates why substantial voltage does not require a strongly charged bulk cytosol.

A membrane potential is an electric potential difference across a cell membrane. We use the conventionTaking the external electric potential as zero makes $V_m<0$ mean that the inside is at lower electric potential. “Negative inside” describes a difference, not an absolute electric potential, and does not imply that the entire cytosol has a large net negative electric charge.

Consider a cell membrane permeable only to potassium ions, with higher potassium concentration inside. Diffusion initially favors outward transport. If balancing negative ions cannot follow, that loss of positive electric charge produces a small inner excess of negative electric charge and an outer positive excess. The resulting electric field favors inward potassium transport. At the Nernst equilibrium potential, chemical and electrical contributions to electrochemical potential balance; ions still cross both ways, with zero net transport.^[ref]

In living biological cells, several ions can permeate and pumps maintain their concentration differences through active transport. Pumps transporting net electric charge also contribute electric current. Thus $V_m=E_{\mathrm{K}}$ is a special limit, not a universal rule; membrane potential need not always be negative.^[ref] The existing reversal potential example shows how opposing electric currents can balance without each ion reaching thermodynamic equilibrium. This makes selective permeability a way to convert chemical differences into electrical signals: changing the available ion channels changes which electrochemical gradients influence the voltage.

The Nernst equilibrium potential is the inside-minus-outside membrane potential at which one ion species has equal electrochemical potential on both sides of a cell membrane. At uniform temperature $T$, using the same reference chemical potential on both sides, $z\ne 0$ is the signed ion charge number, $R$ the molar gas constant, $F$ the Faraday constant, and $a$ the dimensionless thermodynamic activity of that ion. For an ideal dilute chemical solution, the activity ratio becomes the concentration ratio. See Purves et al.: the forces that create membrane potentials and the Nernst equation.

The short derivation is to set the outside-to-inside electrochemical potential change from membrane transport to zero: $RT\ln (a_{\mathrm{inside}}/a_{\mathrm{outside}})+zFV=0$, and solve for $V$. An open pathway carrying only this species by passive transport then has this reversal potential. A balance of several nonzero ion electric currents does not establish this equilibrium condition for each species.

Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley recorded the membrane potential directly between the inside of a squid axon and the external solution. The crucial result was an action potential that passed through zero: the interior became positive, rather than merely losing its negative resting membrane potential. A theory in which excitation simply abolishes membrane selectivity and shorts out the resting membrane potential cannot account for that reversal. Their original report establishes the historical interpretation independently of the unavailable examination picture.^[ref]

The later Hodgkin-Huxley model explains the rising phase through increased sodium permeability and the falling phase through sodium ion-channel inactivation and increased potassium permeability. Distinct Nernst equilibrium potentials make a selective conductance change capable of reversing the membrane potential. The recording established the phenomenon; it did not by itself reveal individual ion channel structures or all their gating kinetics.

Source illustration TODO: the source page's recording is missing in both the held PDF and its archive parent. No amplitudes, time intervals, or trace layout are reconstructed here; the surviving historical request is answered above.

Here $V_m$ is the inside-minus-outside membrane potential, $V_K$ is the potassium Nernst equilibrium potential, and ${\bar{g}}_K$ is the maximum potassium conductance, or conductance per area if $I_K$ is a current density. The factor $n\in [0,1]$ is the permissive-state probability of an activation gate. Four independent permissive gates in an ion channel give the open fraction $n^4$, henceThe model assumes identical independent gating units, additive currents from many ion channels, an approximately ohmic open-pore current, and fixed ionic activities setting $V_K$. Outward positive electric current is obtained for $V_m>V_K$. The original delayed-rectifier term omits rapid ion-channel inactivation. The fourth power is a successful phenomenological gating description, rather than a deduction of the molecular structure from this equation alone.

The lipid cell membrane separates ionic solutions and has selective ion channels, ion pumps, and a finite capacitance. Ionic gradients and unequal permeability allow a small charge separation to generate a membrane potential. The bulk compartments can remain almost electrically neutral even when the narrow interfacial layers carry opposite electric charges.

For one permeant ionic species with valence $z$, its electrochemical potential is $\tilde{\mu }={\mu }^0+k_{B}T\log a+ze\varphi$, where $a$ is its activity. With no applied drive and no net ionic current, electrochemical equilibrium across a permeable membrane givesHence, with the inside-minus-outside convention,For dilute ideal solutions the activities may be replaced by concentrations. At $25^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$ this is $(59.16\mathrm{mV}/z){\log }_{10}(c_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{in}})$. The resulting Nernst equilibrium potential balances diffusive and electrical driving, not necessarily equal concentrations. Physically there must be countercharge, such as impermeant counterions; the single-species idealization concerns the permeant current. With multiple permeant species, zero total current need not mean zero current of each species, and the resting membrane potential is not generally any single species' Nernst equilibrium potential.

Write the instantaneous electrical conductance as $g_K(t)={\bar{g}}_{K}n(t{)}^4$. Here ${\bar{g}}_K$ is the maximal electrical conductance of the recorded membrane, $n$ is the activation variable, $V_m$ is inside-minus-outside membrane potential, and $V_K$ is the potassium Nernst equilibrium potential. The factor $V_m-V_K$ is the electrochemical driving voltage; positive $I_K$ conventionally denotes outward positive charge. For an electric current density, ${\bar{g}}_K$ must instead be an electrical conductance per area.

In the Hodgkin-Huxley model, four equivalent independent activation gates must all be permissive, each with probability $n$, so their joint opening probability is $n^4$. At fixed voltage each gate obeysThe model assumes approximately Ohmic open-channel conduction, a well-defined population-average electrical conductance, and an almost constant potassium reversal potential during a brief recording. Four phenomenological gates should not be mistaken for a proof of four physically independent molecular transitions. The simple delayed-rectifier description also omits ion-channel inactivation.

Reducing the available electrical conductance can weaken repolarization, broaden an action potential and alter repetitive firing. Depending on channel class and tissue, excess excitability or impaired recovery can follow; persistent depolarization can also reduce voltage-gated sodium channel availability. Cardiac potassium-current reductions can prolong the action potential and contribute to Long QT syndrome. These are conditional physiological consequences, not a claim that every potassium-current reduction has the same clinical effect.

Take $V=V_{\mathrm{inside}}-V_{\mathrm{outside}}$. Equality of electrochemical potentials for a monovalent cation gives the Nernst equilibrium potentialAt $T=293.15\mathrm{K}$, $RT/F=25.26\mathrm{mV}$. ThereforeThe signs refer to the stated electrode convention, not to the direction of current at every voltage. Activities are approximated by concentrations and the bulk ionic concentrations are treated as fixed during a single spike.

The hydrophobic core of a lipid bilayer makes transfer of a hydrated ion into bare lipid energetically costly. An ion channel supplies a water-accessible route across that barrier. Its narrow selectivity filter presents coordinating chemical groups that compensate for loss or rearrangement of the ion's hydration shell. Selectivity depends on the free-energy balance of hydration, coordination, electrostatics and geometry, rather than a sieve that passes all smaller ions.

A potassium-channel filter presents backbone carbonyl oxygens in a geometry favourable for potassium; smaller sodium does not automatically gain the same energetic compensation. Sodium and calcium channels use different filter architectures: charged side chains and their coordination environments favour particular ions, with ion occupancy and competing species also affecting permeation. In canonical vertebrate voltage-gated sodium channels, the DEKA selectivity ring illustrates chemical discrimination distinct from potassium-channel carbonyl coordination. The precise mechanism therefore depends on the channel family.

Rapid flux requires low successive free-energy barriers, not permanent binding of the preferred ion. Several occupied sites, nearby water and ion–ion interactions can facilitate passage without requiring the ion to cross the lipid. For scale, a $100\mathrm{pS}$ open channel driven by $100\mathrm{mV}$ carries $10\mathrm{pA}$, approximately $6\times 10^7$ monovalent ions per second. A nanometre-scale route with favourable coordination can support such rapid, thermally driven motion. An ion channel is not an ATP-driven pump: net flux follows the electrochemical potential difference,which vanishes at the species' Nernst equilibrium potential. ATP-consuming pumps maintain the gradients that make sustained channel currents possible.

Permeation selectivity and opening probability are separate properties. Voltage-sensor movement, ligand binding or mechanical tension can regulate access to the pore, while inactivation can terminate conduction during a maintained stimulus. Patch-clamp unitary currents establish discrete conducting states; reversal potentials under changed ionic compositions quantify selectivity. Structure determination locates the filter and gates, and mutations or specific blockers test their functional roles. Agreement between these measurements is stronger evidence than structure or current shape alone.

At the initial negative membrane potential, most voltage-gated potassium channels have a closed activation gate. Depolarization moves charged residues in each voltage-sensing domain, particularly the S4 helices, through the electric field. Coupling between the voltage-sensing domains and the pore opens the intracellular gate. A classical voltage-gated potassium channel has four subunits, each with six transmembrane helices; S5, the pore loop and S6 contribute to the central pathway and selectivity filter. The rising open probability produces increasing outward potassium electric current, since the imposed positive membrane potential is above the potassium Nernst equilibrium potential. Here outward electric current is positive: $I_K=N\gamma p_O(V-E_K)$, where $N$ is channel number and $\gamma$ is single-channel electrical conductance.

The electric current subsequently falls because the rapidly inactivating Shaker form exhibits ball-and-chain inactivation. An intracellular N-terminal domain, tethered to the channel, blocks the open pore. The ion channel can therefore stop conducting while the membrane potential remains depolarized and the activation machinery remains activated. This is ion-channel inactivation, rather than reversal of the voltage step, loss of the ionic driving force, or ordinary gate closure. Repolarization favors removal of the block and recovery of channel availability. Slower C-type inactivation involving the outer pore can coexist, but is not the principal explanation of the rapid decay described here.

Several independent observations connect this functional explanation to structure. Small transient gating electric currents report movement of sensor electric charge before ionic conduction; charge-neutralization studies of S4/S2 change the measured gating charge and activation. Structural studies resolve separate sensor and pore regions.^[ref][ref] Historical N-terminal removal abolished rapid ion-channel inactivation while preserving activation, and the corresponding free peptide restored block from the cytoplasmic side. These results separate the activation gate from the tethered blocker and identify which side of the cell membrane contains the blocking domain.^[ref][ref]

Source-gap TODO: the supplied PDF's figure invokes an undefined image object, so its actual pulse duration, pulse sequence, current scale, peak amplitude, decay time and any tail-current waveform cannot be read. The account above uses only the stated change from $-60$ to $+20\mathrm{mV}$ and the stated rise and rapid decay; no numerical kinetic fit or reconstruction of the missing trace is claimed.

The passive upper limiting membrane potential for a purely sodium-selective pathway is its Nernst equilibrium potential. Equal inside and outside electrochemical potentials, using ideal concentrations, requireThis is the maximum absolute inside-minus-outside voltage under the stated passive assumptions. If the reference resting membrane potential is $-60\mathrm{mV}$, the corresponding increase is about $121\mathrm{mV}$.

Actual action potentials usually peak below $E_{\mathrm{Na}}$ because voltage-gated sodium channels undergo ion-channel inactivation, while outward potassium and leak electric currents oppose inward sodium electric current. Finite membrane capacitance and finite available time also prevent instantaneous equilibration. At $V=E_{\mathrm{Na}}$, the sodium driving force itself is zero.

An ion channel supplies a water-accessible pathway through the otherwise strongly insulating, hydrophobic lipid bilayer. Moving a hydrated ion directly into that low-permittivity region is energetically expensive. The channel's polar pore and coordinating groups reduce the barrier while retaining selectivity. Transport is passive: the electrochemical potential difference drives net movement, and the channel does not itself pump an ion uphill. For an ideal species of charge number $z$,The net electric current of a pathway permeable only to that species reverses at its Nernst equilibrium potential. An open channel can carry zero net electric current at that voltage even while individual ions cross both ways.

The selectivity filter balances loss of the hydration shell against favorable coordination within the pore. In a typical potassium channel, backbone carbonyl oxygen atoms create appropriately arranged binding sites for a substantially dehydrated potassium ion. The smaller sodium ion is not automatically preferred simply because it fits geometrically: its hydration is stronger and the filter does not compensate its dehydration in the same way. Geometry, flexibility, coordination chemistry and ion occupancy all matter. Sodium-selective and calcium-selective channels use different arrangements, often involving charged side chains; a single rigid-sieve explanation is inadequate.

Rapid passage coexists with transient binding because several nearby sites have comparable free energies and relatively low barriers between them. Multiple ions occupying a pore influence one another through electrostatic interactions, enabling correlated exchange and displacement rather than irreversible trapping at one deep site. High throughput therefore requires favorable passage kinetics as well as strong discrimination against unwanted species. A more tightly bound species can even block a pathway instead of being its fastest permeant.

Gating and selectivity are distinct. A voltage-sensing domain couples membrane potential to activation-gate conformation; ligand-gated ion channels couple binding to opening; mechanosensitive ion channels couple membrane stress to opening. Ion-channel inactivation introduces additional unavailable states. None of these mechanisms alone identifies which ion the open pore prefers.

For $N$ similar independent channels, a local Ohmic approximation with outward-positive electric current isHere open probability controls availability, single-channel electrical conductance controls current per open pore, and $V-E_{\mathrm{rev}}$ is the electrical driving factor in this approximation. Nonlinear current-voltage relations and mixed-ion permeation may require a fuller model. Single-channel recording resolves discrete openings; reversal shifts when ionic concentrations change test selectivity; gating electric currents test sensor motion; structural evidence identifies the pore and its coordinating groups. Together these distinguish rapid selective permeation from the separate process of opening the gate.

A reversal potential $E_{\mathrm{rev}}$ is a membrane potential at which a specified open ion channel, or specified combination of ion channels, carries zero net electric current, with the surrounding conditions fixed; the electric current changes sign across that voltage. Specifying which current matters: an individual ion contribution and a sum of several contributions can reverse at different voltages. Zero net electric current does not mean that all ions have stopped moving. See Purves et al., Neuroscience, 2nd edition (2001): reversal of a mixed-ion channel current.

Throughout these examples, membrane potential is $V=V_{\mathrm{inside}}-V_{\mathrm{outside}}$, and conventional current is inward-positive. Positive electric current corresponds to net positive electric charge entering or net negative electric charge leaving. Negative electric current corresponds to the reverse charge transfer. A convenient Ohmic approximation iswhere $g$ is the available electrical conductance. For fixed $g>0$, $V<E_{\mathrm{rev}}$ gives positive electric current, $V=E_{\mathrm{rev}}$ gives zero, and $V>E_{\mathrm{rev}}$ gives negative electric current; the line has slope $-g$. If $g=0$, the modeled pathway carries zero electric current at every voltage: closing it does not locate its reversal potential. 3.1 Synapses (§3.1: conductance-based synaptic current) uses outward-positive $g(V-E)$; the formula here reverses that sign to match this wiki's inward-positive convention.

For the stipulated single-pathway example from ion channel, $E_{\mathrm{rev}}=-80\mathrm{mV}$ and $g=10\mathrm{nS}$ giveThe open ion channel carries zero net electric current at $-80\mathrm{mV}$ even though $g$ remains positive. Near that point a change of membrane potential changes the electric current, which is why zero current at one voltage does not make an open pathway electrically irrelevant; see shunting inhibition.

For an ion channel passing only one ion species by passive transport, its reversal potential can equal that species' Nernst equilibrium potential, where the chemical and electrical contributions to electrochemical potential balance. At that thermodynamic equilibrium, passage in both directions can continue with no net transport. For an ion channel admitting several ion species, opposing contributions can cancel while each species continues to have net transport. Such a reversal potential is not generally any one species' Nernst equilibrium potential. See the Purves reference above.

To work out that cancellation explicitly, put two Ohmic ion channel populations across the same cell membrane. Stipulate constant electrical conductances and fixed reversal potentials:The potassium and sodium contributions add because both pathways experience the same membrane potential:Thus $I_{\mathrm{total}}=12\mathrm{nS}(E_{\mathrm{eff}}-V)$. This weighted mean follows simply by expanding and regrouping the two current terms; it assumes additive Ohmic contributions and a positive total electrical conductance. At $V=E_{\mathrm{eff}}$, the inward-positive individual electric currents areThe potassium contribution is outward and the sodium contribution inward. Equal and opposite electric currents give $I_{\mathrm{total}}=0$; neither pathway has stopped transporting its ions. The calculation treats two distinct pathways. Applying it to one mixed-species ion channel would additionally require a justified decomposition into independent Ohmic contributions; a general mixed-channel reversal potential cannot be obtained by assuming those hypotheses silently.

This is an instantaneous balance of the specified passive electric currents. It would be the stationary voltage of a passive capacitance model containing only these constant pathways and no applied electric current, but it is not a complete prediction of a living cell's resting membrane potential. Other electric currents, voltage-dependent gating, and pumps involved in active transport can matter. Pumps that transfer net electric charge are electrogenic and contribute their own electric current. See Purves et al.: functional properties of the sodium/potassium pump.

The toy model holds ion concentrations and therefore the stipulated reversal potentials fixed. Continuing inward sodium and outward potassium transport would change finite reservoirs unless active transport or external control maintained them. Transport can be a small fraction of the reservoir's ions over a short interval, making fixed concentrations a useful approximation; it is not a claim that the reservoirs never change. See Gerstner et al., Neuronal Dynamics (2014), §2.1: equilibrium potentials, channel currents and maintained gradients.

A reversal potential makes the effect of opening an ion channel predictable from the present membrane potential. The same open pathway can carry inward or outward electric current as $V$ crosses its reversal potential. The two-pathway example reveals a particularly useful distinction: zero net charge transfer can coexist with continuing exchange of different substances. That distinction connects membrane transport to electric current measurements without mistaking electrical balance for thermodynamic equilibrium.

For an ideal dilute chemical solution, moving one mole of a species with signed ion charge number $z$ from outside to inside changes its electrochemical potential byHere $R$ is the molar gas constant, $T$ the uniform absolute temperature, $F$ the Faraday constant, and $c$ the concentration. This assumes the same reference chemical potential on both sides. At thermodynamic equilibrium, $\Delta \tilde{\mu }=0$, henceThe Nernst equilibrium potential uses thermodynamic activities in the general case; replacing them by concentrations is an ideal-solution approximation.

Choose an original passive model: only ${\mathrm{K}}^{+}$ permeates ($z=+1$), other ions cannot cross, there are no pumps or imposed electric currents, and there is no net water transfer. Stipulate reservoir concentrations $c_{\mathrm{in}}=140\mathrm{mM}$ and $c_{\mathrm{out}}=5\mathrm{mM}$, with $T=310\mathrm{K}$, $R=8.314\mathrm{J}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ and $F=96485\mathrm{C}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$. Treat reservoir concentrations as effectively unchanged by charging. ThenThe concentration ratio is dimensionless; $J/C=\mathrm{V}$ supplies the voltage unit. At $V_m=0$, $\Delta \tilde{\mu }>0$ for inward transport, so outward transport is favored. At $V_m=E_{\mathrm{K}}$ it vanishes. A more negative $V_m$ favors inward transport. These sign checks explain the result physically.

Keeping the other chosen inputs fixed, doubling $c_{\mathrm{out}}$ to $10\mathrm{mM}$ raises $E_{\mathrm{K}}$ by $(RT/F)\ln 2\approx 18.52\mathrm{mV}$. Equal inside and outside concentrations give $E_{\mathrm{K}}=0$; reversing their ratio reverses its sign. In finite reservoirs, transport changes both concentrations; the exact final thermodynamic equilibrium must also satisfy material conservation. The fixed-reservoir calculation is useful when only a small fraction of the available ions moves.