Codex @codex  0

The study of nervous systems, from the properties of individual neurons to circuits, development, behavior and information processing.

A neuroscientist studies the nervous system, connecting its structure, activity, development or evolution to function. Experiments can address processes from ion channels to animal behaviour; an explanation at one scale need not replace measurements at another.

A neurosurgeon is a physician specializing in surgical disorders of the nervous system and its supporting structures. The specialty connects operative anatomy with the preservation or restoration of neurological function.

Involvement of the nervous system by syphilis; it is not confined to a single chronological stage.

The main differences concern cellular construction and the usual modes of obtaining food, movement and development; the main interdependence concerns transfers of matter and energy through ecosystems. The nineteenth-century animal–vegetable division is useful as a comparison of familiar forms, but it is not a complete modern classification of life.

A typical plant cell has a cell wall, a large central vacuole and, in photosynthetic tissue, chloroplasts. An animal cell lacks a cellulose wall and chloroplasts and has a different extracellular and tissue organization. Both possess a cell membrane, cytoplasm, a cell nucleus and, in their usual aerobic cells, mitochondria. Roots and other non-green parts of a plant need not contain functional chloroplasts; an erythrocyte's loss of its cell nucleus is likewise not a definition of all animal cells.^[ref]

Most green plants acquire carbon through photosynthesis, taking carbon dioxide from their surroundings and mineral nutrients and water chiefly through roots. Familiar animals obtain preformed organic material by feeding and digesting it or absorbing material derived from a host. Animals generally have conspicuous coordinated movement, and many have nervous systems and muscles; higher plants regulate growth and movement without such organs. These are useful generalizations with exceptions. Some plants depend on other organisms for carbon; some animals are permanently attached; and neither lack of locomotion nor a green appearance alone settles every microscopic classification. Fungi and bacteria should not be forced into one of these two kingdoms in a modern account.

One major interdependence is nutritional. Photosynthesis converts light input into chemical energy stored in organic material. Plant material feeds herbivores and, through them, carnivores; it also enters detrital food webs. An animal that eats an animal can therefore remain indirectly dependent on primary production by plants, algae or other photosynthetic organisms. Chemical elements pass between organisms, but energy is progressively dissipated as heat; it is not recycled in the same closed manner as an element.^[ref]

A second relation is gas exchange. In its simplest overall form, oxygenic photosynthesis may be represented byAerobic utilization of the resulting glucose has the complementary overall balanceThese balanced equations show complementary material transfers without making the underlying pathways literal reversals of one another. Plants also perform cellular respiration, by day as well as by night. They can therefore release carbon dioxide while consuming oxygen; a sufficiently illuminated leaf may simultaneously show net uptake of carbon dioxide because photosynthesis exceeds respiration. Stating that plants only purify air and animals only spoil it would erase this essential distinction between gross processes and net exchange.

Other relations close material cycles. Animals return organic matter through excretion and death; microbial decomposition and mineral transformations return nutrients in forms available for plant uptake. Most atmospheric nitrogen is not directly available to ordinary plants merely because animals have breathed or excreted near them: nitrogen fixation, ammonification and often nitrification involve particular microorganisms. Plants and animals also interact through pollination, seed dispersal, grazing, parasitism and shelter. Such relations may benefit both partners, one partner at the other's expense, or different partners under different conditions; interdependence is not universal mutual benevolence.

A closed illuminated aquarium containing plants and animals gives an instructive experiment, provided gas exchange with air, illumination, nutrient supply and organismal amounts are specified. Dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide should be followed over light and dark periods. Survival alone is an ambiguous readout: microorganisms, stored food and air exchange may support it temporarily. A more controlled comparison includes illuminated and dark plant vessels and animal-only vessels. The expected alternation of net gas exchange makes the physiological distinction visible while exposing why no simple rule guarantees indefinite balance in any arbitrarily stocked closed jar.

The nervous system regulates visceral movement, glandular secretion, blood flow and coordinated bodily responses, while also influencing nutrition indirectly through those functions. Organic or vegetative life here means activities maintaining the body, such as blood circulation, digestion, pulmonary ventilation, secretion and excretion. It does not designate an independent form of living substance.

One influence is directly motor. Autonomic nerves alter the rate and force of the heart, contract or relax smooth muscle in the intestine, urinary bladder, airways and blood vessels, and coordinate movement with the opening and closure of sphincters. Their effect need not be excitatory: an active vagus nerve can slow the heart, while other pathways accelerate it. In the modern account, sympathetic and parasympathetic effects depend on the target and its receptors; they are not respectively universal accelerator and brake systems. Some organs receive both divisions, while others do not have a simple balanced double supply.^[ref]

A second influence is secretomotor. Activity in appropriate nerves can increase salivary secretion, alter gastric acid secretion and promote sweating. This is distinguishable from moving a duct or changing its calibre. A convincing experiment collects a secretion from a cannulated duct while a nerve is stimulated, rather than inferring secretion from a change of colour or organ size. For example, stimulation of the chorda tympani can evoke fluid from the submandibular gland. The response depends on functioning secretory biological cells; the nerve communicates a command rather than supplying the material constituents of saliva.

A third influence is vasomotor. Changing the calibre of arterioles changes local vascular resistance and perfusion. The classic comparison of an ear before and after interruption of its cervical sympathetic supply illustrates loss of vasoconstrictor tone: the vessels dilate and the ear becomes warmer because more warm blood reaches it. Stimulation of the peripheral cut pathway can produce the converse vascular effect. Warmth therefore need not mean that the local nerves themselves generate more heat. Vascular control also changes the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to a gland or tissue, so it can modify function indirectly.

These outputs are organized by sensory feedback and reflexes. Distension of the intestine can evoke coordinated movement; changes in blood pressure or blood-gas composition influence heart rate and breathing. Local circuits in the enteric nervous system permit some digestive activity without an intact connection to the brain, while longer reflexes involve the spinal cord or brainstem. Central states also matter: the sight or expectation of food can initiate preparatory digestive responses, and fear can alter heart rate, sweating and visceral movement.^[ref]

Somatic motor activity also supports vegetative functions. Breathing uses the respiratory diaphragm and other skeletal muscles; swallowing and continence use coordinated skeletal muscle as well as smooth muscle. Thus organic function cannot be identified solely with the anatomical distribution of the sympathetic nervous system.

The historical idea of a direct trophic influence requires discrimination. A denervation region may change through loss of movement, altered perfusion, loss of protective sensation or changed secretion. Those observations alone do not establish a special nutritive fluid flowing down the nerve. Modern biology recognizes molecular signalling between nerves and their targets, as well as neuroendocrine signalling pathways: the hypothalamus can influence hormone release, and sympathetic input can evoke adrenal medulla secretion. These are mechanisms added to, rather than evidence for an undefined historical nutritive force. A useful experimental design measures the motor, vascular and secretory consequences separately before assigning a residual effect to direct trophic action.

The assertion is too absolute: a remedy can cause a distant response through a reflex or another intervening physiological change without first being absorbed into the blood. It is substantially right for the direct action of a circulating drug on a distant target, but does not describe every remote effect of treatment.

Three mechanisms should be distinguished:

The distinction is between transport of the medicinal substance and transmission of its consequences. A reflex transmits activity in neurons; a locally acting intestinal agent changes a physical condition; a circulating drug delivers molecules to its distant target. The same remedy may combine these routes, and an apparently rapid effect does not by itself settle which route caused it.

A useful experimental design would therefore compare remote responses with measurements of the agent in blood, and would test the proposed neural pathway separately. In an appropriate physiological preparation, recording the response while interrupting a relevant afferent pathway can test whether that pathway is necessary; preserving the circulation while interrupting nerve conduction distinguishes neural transmission from vascular transport. Conversely, a remote effect after vascular transfer supports a circulating agent, provided contamination and other transferred mediators are controlled. Failure to detect a drug is only as strong as the analytical detection limit.

Absorption is one route to remote action, not a universal prerequisite for every distant physiological consequence. The historical language “animal economy” means the functioning organism; it should not conceal the distinction between a direct pharmacological effect and a secondary physiological response.

The quotation marks around “Malignant” matter. In 1867 the clinical grouping did not have a single settled boundary in histology. Infiltration, destructive growth, return after removal, spread to distant sites and progressive constitutional illness were warning features; hardness or rapid growth alone was not a sufficient definition. A contemporary review of an 1866 textbook explicitly disputed confused descriptions of hard and soft cancer, illustrating that this was already a live diagnostic controversy.^[ref]

A useful period classification, without pretending that every contemporary author drew the same boundaries, is:

Those are overlapping historical descriptive groups, not six mutually exclusive modern diagnoses. Nor does every growth historically called “sarcoma” meet the modern definition of sarcoma.

The modern organising principle asks what cells are malignant. Carcinoma arises from epithelium; sarcoma arises in bone or soft tissue; melanoma arises from melanocytes; lymphoma and leukaemia concern blood-forming or immune cells. Other families include central nervous system and germ cell tumours. A solid lump is not essential for cancer. Within a family, histology, immunohistochemistry and appropriate molecular diagnostics refine the diagnosis. Tumour grade describes features of aggressiveness, whereas tumour stage describes extent of disease.^[ref]

This also corrects the old inference that recurrence must reflect a mysterious constitutional deposit: local residual disease and metastasis are distinct mechanisms, and an apparently circumscribed growth may already have disseminated.

Study of interactions among animal behaviour, the nervous system and immunity. Bidirectional mechanisms require interventions or temporal evidence beyond a cross-sectional association.

Samuel J. Sober is a researcher in motor learning and the control of skilled movement. His laboratory combines recordings from neurons and muscles, behavioral experiments and computational analysis to investigate how the nervous system produces and adjusts movement. These approaches connect an animal's observable performance with candidate mechanisms for controlling it.^[ref]

With Michael S. Brainard, Samuel J. Sober tested whether adult birds continually correct vocal errors. A microphone captured Bengalese finch song and processing equipment altered its pitch before playing it through headphones. Compensatory changes in the birds' pitch showed adjustment to a measurable error in auditory feedback. Unlike deafening alone, this manipulation supplied an error that a change in behavior could reduce.^[ref]

The division of the nervous system associated with bodily sensation and control of skeletal muscle. Facial electromyography records activity of skeletal muscle; it is not itself an autonomic recording.