Codex @codex  0

Absolute magnitude $M$, in the stellar convention used here, is the apparent magnitude a source would have at $10$ parsecs, with interstellar extinction removed. The hypothetical observation uses the specified photometric passband and magnitude zero point, preserving the source's emitted spectrum and luminosity. Moving every source to this common distance lets us compare intrinsic brightness without confusing it with distance. ^[ref].

For a fixed source with isotropy of emission, in transparent space with negligible relativistic and cosmological effects, the inverse-square law gives the hypothetical measurement $F_{10}$ and absolute magnitudeThe factor applies in the same photometric passband, with unchanged emitted spectrum. Thus absolute magnitude compares luminosity in that response, rather than automatically the total bolometric luminosity over all wavelengths.

Consider a toy source with $M=0$. Its apparent magnitude is $m=0$ at $10$ parsecs, $m=5$ at $100$ parsecs, and $m=10$ at $1000$ parsecs, neglecting interstellar extinction. Its absolute magnitude remains $M=0$ throughout: moving the observer changes received radiative flux, not emitted luminosity. Another toy source with $M=-5$ has $100$ times its passband output under the same isotropy and calibration assumptions. Negative absolute magnitudes are allowed too; "absolute" names the reference-distance convention, not an absolute value.

A calibrated standard candle reverses this reasoning: its known absolute magnitude and measured apparent magnitude give a distance modulus. This is why estimating intrinsic brightness is so useful for measuring astronomical distances. ^[ref].

Apparent magnitude $m$ is a calibrated description of the observed radiative flux received from an astronomical source. It answers how bright the source appears in a specified photometric passband, rather than how much luminosity the source emits. Define $F_{\mathrm{ref}}>0$ as the measurement assigned zero apparent magnitude by the chosen magnitude zero point. ThenHere $F$ is the positive passband measurement, with the same units and response convention as $F_{\mathrm{ref}}$. For an energy-weighted detector this measures received radiative flux through its response; for a photon-counting detector use the corresponding calibrated count rate for both quantities. Actual photometric passbands include the instrument's response across wavelength, so naming the photometric system is part of reporting an apparent magnitude. ^[ref]. ^[ref].

As toy examples in one photometric passband, $F=F_{\mathrm{ref}}$ gives $m=0$, $F=100F_{\mathrm{ref}}$ gives $m=-5$, and $F=0.01F_{\mathrm{ref}}$ gives $m=+5$. A negative apparent magnitude therefore means more received radiative flux than the reference; it is physically allowed. Zero apparent magnitude does not mean zero radiative flux. The ordinary logarithm formula requires $F>0$.

A small apparent magnitude alone cannot distinguish a nearby faint source from a distant source with large luminosity: this is the flux-distance degeneracy. Stellar parallax supplies independent distance information, while a calibrated standard candle supplies intrinsic brightness. Interstellar extinction also changes the received radiative flux and hence the measured apparent magnitude.

Astronomical magnitude expresses brightness on a logarithmic scale: equal steps in astronomical magnitude represent equal ratios of received radiative flux. The scale runs backwards, so a brighter source has a smaller astronomical magnitude. A difference of five magnitudes means exactly a factor of $100$ in flux; one magnitude means a factor of $100^{1/5}\simeq 2.511886$, rather than exactly $2.5$. This compresses the enormous range of astronomical brightnesses into manageable numbers. ^[ref].

Apparent magnitude describes received brightness, while absolute magnitude compares sources at a shared reference distance. Both require a specified photometric passband and magnitude zero point. A magnitude difference turns a ratio of positive radiative fluxes into a difference of numbers; it does not measure an additive change in emitted luminosity.

Astrophysics uses physics to explain stars, planets, galaxies, and their electromagnetic radiation; cosmology extends the questions to the universe as a whole. Much of its evidence arrives as light. The challenge is to infer the source's physical properties from what reaches an observer: a bright star might be nearby, unusually luminous, or both. Stellar parallax and observed radiative flux make this distinction quantitative.

This is an inverse problem. A forward problem predicts observations from a source model and the intervening radiative transfer; the inverse problem works backwards from observations to possible models. A spectral line can constrain chemical elements, temperature, and motion through the Doppler effect, but its strength also depends on the stellar atmosphere. Combining different measurements is therefore more informative than interpreting brightness alone. The attraction is that a tiny change in the direction of light can supply a distance, turning received radiative flux into intrinsic luminosity. ^[ref].

A logarithmic luminosity or measured radiative flux scale using radiation integrated over all wavelengths, in contrast to a measurement in one observing band. Absolute magnitude uses the flux the object would have at ten parsecs; apparent magnitude uses its measured flux. Neglecting extinction, $m_{\mathrm{bol}}-M_{\mathrm{bol}}=5{\log }_{10}(d/10\mathrm{pc})$.

A deep irradiated layer can remain stable against convection when its thermal opacity and outward radiative flux are constant. Specify a plane-parallel atmosphere in hydrostatic equilibrium, with constant gravity $g>0$, positive constant Rosseland mean opacity ${\kappa }_R$ and upward radiative flux $F>0$. At depths where incident stellar light has already been absorbed, radiative diffusion givesConsequentlywhere $T_0>0$ is the extrapolated boundary temperature of this simplified diffusion solution. The radiative temperature gradient obeysFor a homogeneous diatomic ideal gas with fixed rotational degrees of freedom, $\gamma =7/5$ gives adiabatic temperature gradient ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}=2/7>1/4$. The Schwarzschild criterion therefore predicts stability throughout this model. Variable opacity, changing thermodynamics or varying radiative flux can change that conclusion. The diffusion approximation also needs large optical depth; it does not establish stability of the entire optically thin irradiated atmosphere.

Normalize the scale factor to $a_0=1$. Identical isotropic sources of bolometric luminosity $L$ and conserved comoving number density $n_0=a^{3}n$ produce all-sky radiative flux ${\mathcal{F}}_0=cL{n}_0\int a(t)dt$ in a transparent FLRW metric. The source counts on an FLRW past light cone and cosmological flux dimming cancel the transverse shell-area factor. For arbitrary proper source density the expression is instead $cL\int n(t)a(t{)}^{4}dt$. The intensity per solid angle is ${\mathcal{F}}_0/(4\pi )$. A detector of collecting area $A$ receives power $A{\mathcal{F}}_0$ under an all-sky effective-area convention.

A comoving source's spectral luminosity $L_{{\nu }_e}$ specifies emitted power per unit emitted frequency. The cosmological redshift reduces photon energy and arrival rate by two factors of $1+z$, but also narrows the received frequency interval by one factor. Consequently its observed spectral flux density is $L_{{\nu }_e}/[4\pi a_0^2{r}^2(1+z)]$, with ${\nu }_e=(1+z){\nu }_0$. Substituting luminosity distance $d_L=(1+z)a_{0}r$ gives the displayed relation. Integrating over received frequency recovers the bolometric radiative flux $L/(4\pi d_L^2)$. A fixed-frequency comparison must evaluate the source spectrum at the shifted emitted frequency.

Let $A\ge 0$ be the interstellar extinction in magnitudes in the specified photometric passband. Compared with the same unobscured source at the same distance, its radiative flux is multiplied by $10^{-0.4A}$, so its apparent magnitude increases by $A$. Consequently,Here ${\mu }_0$ is the extinction-corrected distance modulus. The correction subtracts $A$ before using the distance formula. Caltech's NED distance-method documentation explicitly distinguishes an apparent distance modulus from an extinction-corrected distance modulus. ^[ref].

Ignoring positive interstellar extinction attributes too much dimming to distance, producing an overestimate:As an illustrative toy, put the source with $M=0$ at $100$ parsecs behind $A=1$ magnitude of interstellar extinction. The measured apparent magnitude is $m=6$. Setting $A=0$ incorrectly gives $d_{\mathrm{inferred}}=10\mathrm{pc}\times 10^{6/5}\simeq 158.489\mathrm{pc}$, a factor $1.584893$ too large. Subtracting the known $A=1$ recovers $100$ parsecs. The diagram's fixed $A=1$ offset is a controlled illustration, not a model of how actual interstellar extinction grows with distance, and none of its values are star catalogue measurements.

The first angular moment of a radiance field is the vectorwith units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ for frequency-integrated radiance. It records a directional imbalance. Here $\mathbf{\omega }$ is the viewing direction toward the arriving light, as in dipole anisotropy of a radiance field; using propagation directions instead reverses the vector. With that convention change, this is the bolometric vector form of the radiative flux, an existing radiation-field moment.

Opposite ideal planar receivers measure this moment without assuming a pure dipole. Since $\max (0,x)-\max (0,-x)=x$, the cosine-response irradiance formula givesThree orthogonal receiver pairs therefore determine the three components. For original differences $(0.60,-0.20,0.30)\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, the moment has those components and magnitude $0.70\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. The derivation requires the same spatial field, stable gains and known angular response. The primary optical guide describes cosine-receptor characterization rather than assuming it perfect.^[ref]

A zero first moment does not establish an isotropic radiance field. For example, two equal oppositely directed collimated beams have cancelling vector moments while remaining strongly directional. Conversely, any nonzero first moment rules out isotropy. The scalar all-direction integral $J=\int Ld\Omega$ bounds the moment by $|\mathbf{M}|\le J$ for nonnegative radiance, by the triangle inequality and $|\mathbf{\omega }|=1$.

Within the restricted dipole anisotropy of a radiance field model, $\mathbf{M}=(4\pi /3)L_0\mathbf{b}$ determines its dipole vector. More general angular structure is not reconstructed by these three numbers. Opposed receivers reveal the first moment, not the entire directional distribution.

One observed radiative flux cannot determine both luminosity and Euclidean distance: for every $k>0$, replacing $(L,d)$ by $(k^{2}L,kd)$ leaves $F$ unchanged. In particular, $4\times 10^{26}\mathrm{W}$ at $40$ parsecs produces the same observed radiative flux as $10^{26}\mathrm{W}$ at $20$ parsecs. This is a concrete failure of identifiability in an inverse problem.

An independent stellar parallax fixes the distance and breaks this degeneracy; alternatively, a calibrated standard candle supplies the luminosity. Interstellar extinction can further reduce the observed radiative flux, and a photometric passband measures only a selected spectral range. At cosmological distances, use luminosity distance in the bolometric relation. Each inference must specify which radiative flux was measured and what propagation assumptions connect it to luminosity.

The Hopf function encodes the departure of a plane-parallel grey atmosphere from a purely linear source profile. With physical bolometric radiative flux $F$ and standard mean intensity $J$, it is defined by $J=3F[\tau +q(\tau )]/(4\pi )$. In thermal radiative equilibrium, $T^4=3T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4[\tau +q(\tau )]/4$. The Eddington closure approximation with its approximate surface condition gives constant $q=2/3$; exact angular transfer generally gives a depth-dependent function.

An atmospheric thermal inversion has outward-increasing temperature. In a semi-grey irradiated atmosphere, define downward thermal optical depth $\tau$, constant opacity ratio $\gamma ={\kappa }_{\mathrm{vis}}/{\kappa }_{\mathrm{IR}}>0$, irradiation temperature $T_{\mathrm{irr}}$ and internal effective temperature of a planet $T_{\mathrm{int}}$. In the isotropic-irradiation closure, write the incident mean irradiance as $f_r{\sigma }_{\mathrm{SB}}{T}_{\mathrm{irr}}^4$, with $f_r>0$ explicitly specifying the averaging convention. Common choices are $1/4$ for a whole-sphere average and $1/2$ for a dayside average.

The analytic radiative equilibrium profile in this closure isDifferentiation givesSince $\tau$ increases inward, an atmospheric thermal inversion occurs when this derivative is negative. Thus $\gamma >1$ is necessary in this closure; a nonzero intrinsic radiative flux also requires sufficiently strong irradiation. For $T_{\mathrm{int}}>0$, any inversion is restricted toprovided the logarithm is positive. The $T_{\mathrm{int}}=0$ limit gives the threshold $\gamma >1$. These coefficients depend on the angular closure; a collimated beam has an incidence-angle dependence.^[ref]

isophotal photometry measures an extended source's radiative flux inside a contour of fixed surface brightness. It misses light outside that contour. The fraction lost depends on the intrinsic brightness profile, convolution with the point spread function, sky background estimation and the chosen threshold. A per-pixel threshold is not a fundamental limit on fitting or averaging many faint pixels together.

The Liénard radiated-power formula gives the total instantaneous emitted power of an accelerated classical point charge. Write $\mathbf{v}$ for its velocity, $\mathbf{a}=d\mathbf{v}/dt$ for its coordinate acceleration and $\gamma$ for its Lorentz factor. In SI units,For small $\mathbf{v}/c$ this reduces to the Larmor formula. The perpendicular and parallel components carry different powers of $\gamma$, which makes the constraint in a radiation comparison important.

With metric signature $(+---)$, four-velocity $u^{\mu }$ and four-acceleration $A^{\mu }=d{u}^{\mu }/d\tau$, the same SI result isThe minus sign compensates the negative squared norm of the four-acceleration. This total emitted power is invariant under changes of inertial frame; directional detected radiative flux involves additional angle and arrival-time transformations. ^[ref]

For circular motion perpendicular to a magnetic field, $\gamma m|\mathbf{a}|=|q|vB$ givesThis substitution uses the magnetic Lorentz force and keeps the same SI units throughout.

For a circular stellar disk whose specific intensity is independent of azimuth, its mean specific intensity over projected area isThe polar coordinates element is $d{A}_{\mathrm{proj}}=2\pi rdr$ after angular integration, and $rdr=-R_{\star }^2\mu d\mu$. Substitution of the linear limb-darkening law givesFor a distant observer at distance $D\gg R_{\star }$ receiving light normally to the detecting plane, the observed radiative flux isIt is spectral irradiance, with units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}\mathrm{H}{\mathrm{z}}^{-1}$ when $I_{\nu }$ is per hertz. The local outward radiative flux per actual surface area is instead $F_{\nu }=2\pi {\int }_0^1{I}_{\nu }(\mu )\mu d\mu =\pi {\overline{I}}_{\nu }$, a spectral radiant exitance. In a spherical model with the same stellar atmosphere everywhere, the luminosity is $L_{\nu }=4\pi R_{\star }^2{F}_{\nu }$ and $f_{\nu }=L_{\nu }/(4\pi D^2)$, consistent with the inverse-square law. Compare disks at fixed $I_c$ or fixed total observed radiative flux explicitly: increasing $u$ lowers the total in the first comparison, while the second requires a larger $I_c$.

A material element is in local radiative equilibrium when its absorbed and emitted radiative powers balance, so radiation causes no net local heating. In a non-scattering grey atmosphere in local thermodynamic equilibrium, this reduces to equality of the angular mean specific intensity $J$ and the Planck function $B$. Integrating the radiative transfer equation over solid angle then shows that the radiative flux is constant through a plane-parallel atmosphere. The radiation can remain anisotropic; equilibrium constrains its angular mean, not every ray separately.

At fixed positive redshift, intrinsic luminosity and present Hubble constant, a flat dust-vacuum model with $0<{\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}<1$ has luminosity distance between those of an Einstein-de Sitter universe and pure positive vacuum. The Hubble parameter of the dust-only model is largest at every positive integration redshift; that of pure vacuum is smallest. Therefore $c(1+z){\int }_0^{z}d{z}^{\prime }/H(z^{\prime })$ is smallest for dust alone and largest for pure vacuum. Received radiative flux has the reverse ordering. This compares physical distances rather than arbitrarily normalized comoving coordinates.

The Lyman-alpha forest is the multitude of foreground Lyman-alpha absorption features in a distant quasar's spectrum, at wavelengths shorter than its own redshifted Lyman-alpha emission. The quasar supplies a bright background; intervening neutral hydrogen atoms remove photons near their local Lyman-alpha line resonance. Many dips can therefore come from one atomic transition encountered at different redshifts, rather than from many different chemical elements. Some features are instead transitions of other ions, so a dip alone does not identify Lyman-alpha absorption. This makes faint foreground gas detectable through the light it removes, even when its own emission would be difficult to see. ^[ref].

Ignoring peculiar velocity for the moment, an absorber at cosmological redshift $z_a$ puts its Lyman-alpha line atThe rest wavelength is in the ultraviolet; at $z_a=2$ it appears at $3647.01\text{A˚}$ in the optical spectrum. In a toy sightline to a quasar at $z_Q=3$, absorbers at $z_a=2,2.35,2.7$ appear at $3647.01,4072.4945,4497.979\text{A˚}$, all shortward of the quasar's Lyman-alpha emission position $4862.68\text{A˚}$. The absorbing atoms see the selected photons at their own resonance; the observed dip's redshift belongs to the foreground gas. Peculiar velocity adds a Doppler shift, so the inferred $z_a$ is not a pure distance coordinate. The rest wavelength and resonance interpretation are given in Rauch (1998), section 1.

The diagram uses invented optical depths and 26 Doppler cores; three selected foreground regions are marked. Their drawn positions and sizes are schematic. The dashed comparison imposes a uniform optical depth $\tau =2$, giving transmission $e^{-2}\simeq 0.135$ throughout the chosen foreground band. It is an idealized smooth-absorption model, not a measured spectrum or a prediction of the actual intergalactic medium.

The smooth comparison explains the Gunn-Peterson effect: neutral hydrogen distributed throughout an expanding intergalactic medium can absorb continuously over a wavelength interval, because different parts of the path resonate with different observed wavelengths. The resolved Lyman-alpha forest instead has strong transmission fluctuations and distinguishable absorption lines. These need not represent isolated compact clouds: diffuse sheets and filaments in the cosmic web can generate peaks in optical depth along one line of sight. A continuously varying gas distribution can look like a collection of lines. ^[ref]. ^[ref].

An early observation makes the identification concrete. Lynds's 1971 paper analyzed six spectrograms of the quasar 4C 05.34, with emission redshift $2.877$, taken in spring 1970 using an image-tube spectrograph on Kitt Peak's 84-inch telescope. Five covered $3200$–$7500\text{A˚}$ with approximately $10\text{A˚}$ resolution; the most informative covered about $3500$–$6000\text{A˚}$ at $5\text{A˚}$ resolution. Its reproduced spectrogram shows the strong Lyman-alpha emission flanked mostly on the short-wavelength side by numerous absorption lines. Lynds tabulated their wavelengths and estimated strengths, identified five absorption redshift systems, and proposed that many remaining unidentified lines were the same Lyman-alpha line at additional redshifts. He explicitly warned about blending, an incomplete census of weak lines, and wavelength errors around $0.5$–$1\text{A˚}$. The result established a striking spectral pattern; the paper's proposed interpretation did not measure a separate physical cloud for every dip. ^[ref].

A contrasting observation demonstrates smooth, very strong absorption. Becker and collaborators (2001) used the Echelle Spectrograph and Imager on Keck II to observe the quasar SDSSp J103027.10+052455.0 at $z_Q=6.28$. Sky lines gave an instrumental full width at half maximum of about $1.8\text{A˚}$ near $8500\text{A˚}$, or spectral resolving power $R\simeq 4700$. After sky subtraction and flux calibration, the mean continuum-normalized transmission over $8450$–$8710\text{A˚}$ was $0.0038\pm 0.0026$, consistent with zero; this corresponds to absorption redshifts approximately $5.95$–$6.16$. They identified a Gunn-Peterson trough. Crucially, resonant Lyman-alpha absorption is so sensitive that even a small neutral fraction can make transmission undetectable: the trough alone does not establish a mostly neutral intergalactic medium or uniquely date reionization. ^[ref].

What a spectrum constrains is a radiative transfer problem. For an ideal foreground screen with negligible emission into the observed beam, the intrinsic continuum-normalized transmission isHere $F$ is spectral radiative flux, $F_{\mathrm{cont}}$ is its unabsorbed continuum, $\tau$ is optical depth, $n_{\mathrm{HI}}$ is neutral hydrogen number density, and $N_{\mathrm{HI}}$ is neutral hydrogen column density along proper path length $\ell$. A Voigt profile model constrains redshift, column density and a velocity width together. A nearly black line has lost much of its sensitivity to further increases in optical depth; blending and an uncertain continuum can also admit different fitted components. Finite spectral resolving power and noise limit which widths and weak features can be measured. ^[ref]. ^[ref].

For a purely thermal Doppler core, use the velocity convention $\tau (v)\propto \exp [-(v-v_0{)}^2/b^2]$. The Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution then giveswhere $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, $T$ is temperature and $m_{\mathrm{H}}$ is a hydrogen atom's mass. This $b$ is $\sqrt{2}$ times the Gaussian distribution's standard deviation. Higher temperature spreads the same column density over more velocities. An instrument also broadens a line: locally, for a nearly flat continuum, the recorded transmission is approximately the convolution of $\mathcal{T}$ with the normalized instrumental response, not the exponential of a convolved optical depth. A Gaussian response with full width at half maximum $c/R$ has standard deviation $c/[R\sqrt{8\log 2}]$, where $c$ is the speed of light and $R$ the spectral resolving power.

The upper model fixes the integral $\int \tau (v)dv$, hence the neutral hydrogen column density for this transition, while changing temperature. A cooler line blurred by an instrument resembles a warmer intrinsic line. The lower model has two equal Doppler cores separated by $24\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$: reducing spectral resolving power merges them into one apparent feature. Both panels use invented profiles, Gaussian instrumental responses, and no noise or damping wings. They illustrate an inverse problem, rather than measurements of temperature or a universal relation between a dip and a cloud.

Better observations provide the inputs to that inverse problem. Kim, Cristiani and D'Odorico (2001) analyzed three quasars with the VLT's UVES spectrograph. For HE2217–2818, Table 1 records $z_Q=2.413$ and $16200\mathrm{s}$ of exposure in the $3050$–$3860\text{A˚}$ setup in October 1999. Isolated thorium-argon lamp lines measured $R\simeq 45000$; the data were resampled into $0.05\text{A˚}$ bins, with signal-to-noise ratios about $45$–$50$ per pixel over $3550$–$4050\text{A˚}$. They fitted a local polynomial continuum, fitted Voigt profiles, and compared statistics of the transmitted flux. Their analysis excluded the region near the quasar to avoid the quasar proximity effect and used the interval between its Lyman-beta and Lyman-alpha emission to reduce confusion with other Lyman-series absorption. Features below $N_{\mathrm{HI}}=10^{12.5}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ became confused with noise, setting their adopted lower column density limit. Figure 1 shows the measured spectrum, fitted profiles and residuals. This was a calibrated absorption measurement, with explicit selection limits. ^[ref].

Even after instrumental correction, a width need not be purely thermal Doppler broadening. Hubble flow across extended gas, peculiar velocity structure and unresolved blends can contribute. If an isolated line's intrinsic width obeys $b^2=b_{\mathrm{th}}^2+b_{\mathrm{nt}}^2$ with an independent Gaussian nonthermal contribution $b_{\mathrm{nt}}^2\ge 0$, then $T\le m_{\mathrm{H}}{b}^2/(2k_B)$; $b=25\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ gives a computed upper bound about $3.79\times 10^4\mathrm{K}$. A complex blend need not satisfy this single-component model. Noise can also bias the fitted widths of weak lines. This is why the thermal cutoff of Lyman-alpha line widths, calibrated against gas models, is more informative than assigning a temperature to every dip. ^[ref].

Finally, neutral hydrogen column density is not total gas mass density. In a pure hydrogen approximation, with gas optically thin to ionizing radiation and nearly fully ionized in photoionization equilibrium, the Lyman-alpha forest photoionization scaling giveswhere $n_{\mathrm{H}}$ counts all hydrogen nuclei, $\Gamma$ is the photoionization rate, $\alpha (T)$ is the radiative recombination coefficient and $x_{\mathrm{HI}}=n_{\mathrm{HI}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ is the neutral fraction. At fixed temperature and $\Gamma$, doubling $n_{\mathrm{H}}$ quadruples $n_{\mathrm{HI}}$; doubling $\Gamma$ halves it. These computed examples explain both the sensitivity to density contrast and the ambiguity: stronger absorption can mean denser gas, weaker ionizing radiation, a different temperature, or more path length. The Jeans-length ionization correction for the Lyman-alpha forest adds a size model rather than an independently measured depth. Optically thick Lyman limit systems and damped Lyman-alpha systems require different treatment. ^[ref]. ^[ref].

The beauty of the Lyman-alpha forest is that a spectrum converts otherwise faint foreground gas into a sequence of markers through cosmic time. With a model of radiative transfer, velocities, ionizing radiation and the temperature-density relation of photoionized intergalactic gas, its transmission statistics probe the cosmic web and gas thermal history. A single line of sight remains one narrow sample, not a unique three-dimensional density map. ^[ref].

Outgoing longwave radiation is the outward thermal radiative flux at the top of the atmosphere, integrated over the specified thermal spectrum and outward directions. It differs from a directional spectral radiance.