Codex @codex  0

A wavefront connects points with the same wave phase at one specified time. It is a surface, rather than the trajectory of a particular piece of light. For a scalar monochromatic wave written as $u(\mathbf{r},t)=A(\mathbf{r})\cos \Phi (\mathbf{r},t)$, a wavefront is a connected level set of the phase function $\Phi$; different surfaces can share the same wave phase modulo $2\pi$. A plane wave has planar wavefronts. An outward wave from an ideal point source in a uniform medium has spheres as wavefronts, while an optical lens can turn nearly planar wavefronts into converging ones. The wavefront describes wave phase, not wave amplitude: drawing it does not say how bright the beam is. ^[ref]

The relation to light rays becomes precise in a stationary medium with isotropy, negligible loss and a real positive scalar refractive index $n(\mathbf{r},\omega )$. In the geometrical optics limit, spatial changes in the refractive index and wave amplitude are slow on the local wavelength scale. For a single smooth propagation branch, writeHere $\omega >0$ is the angular frequency, $c$ is the vacuum speed of light, $S$ has units of length, and the last relation is the optical eikonal equation. The local wavevector is $\mathbf{k}=\nabla \Phi =k_0\nabla S$. Its direction is normal to a smooth wavefront, since a gradient is normal to its level sets. A forward light ray has unit tangent vector $d\mathbf{r}/ds=\nabla S/n$, so it follows this normal under the stated assumptions. Along that light ray, $dS/ds=\nabla S\cdot (d\mathbf{r}/ds)=n$: the change in $S$ is the optical path length. This is the short geometric argument linking wavefronts, light rays and optical path length. ^[ref]

The diagram shows incident and transmitted branches separately, with the reflected branch omitted. Its stipulated refractive indices are $n_1=1$ and $n_2=3/2$, and its incident angle is $30^{\circ }$ to the interface normal. At a stationary interface, the frequency and tangential wavevector agree on the two sides: Snell's law gives $\sin {\theta }_2=1/3$, hence ${\theta }_2\approx 19.4712^{\circ }$. The wavefronts turn while their normal spacing decreases from ${\lambda }_0$ to $2{\lambda }_0/3$, where ${\lambda }_0$ is the vacuum wavelength. More explicitly, with $x$ normal to the interface and $y$ tangential, take $S_1=\sqrt{3}x/2+y/2$ for $x<0$ and $S_2=\sqrt{2}x+y/2$ for $x>0$. These functions agree at $x=0$; the drawn wavefronts are $S_j=m{\lambda }_0$ at $t=0$ with ${\varphi }_0=0$. This is an exact piecewise plane wave phase construction for the stipulated transparent media, not measured material data. ^[ref]

The normal-to-wavefront rule requires its assumptions. In a medium with anisotropy, the wavevector remains normal to a smooth wavefront, but the group velocity and energy flux need not follow it. ^[ref] Near a wave caustic, where multiple light rays meet, one smooth phase function may no longer describe the field; diffraction and the full wave amplitude matter. A wavefront is also not generally a surface of equal pulse arrival time. In a medium with optical dispersion, a monochromatic wave phase moves with the phase velocity, while a sufficiently narrow wave packet follows the group velocity. Even identical optical path lengths at one frequency can give different group delays. The usual equal-travel-time picture needs a common launch reference and a nondispersive ray model; an arbitrary broadband disturbance has no single monochromatic wavefront.^[ref]

A wave map is a harmonic map with Lorentzian domain: a critical point of the action obtained by contracting the pullback target metric with the domain Lorentzian metric. For target sphere $S^2$ in Euclidean space and $\square =-{\partial }_t^2+\Delta$, its extrinsic equation is $\square \varphi =\varphi (|{\varphi }_t{|}^2-|\nabla \varphi {|}^2)$, subject to $|\varphi |=1$. The derivative contractions are null forms for wave equations. Wave map Cauchy data must include a tangent initial velocity.

The Weingarten formula decomposes the ambient derivative of a normal field into a tangential shape operator term and the normal connection. The minus sign corresponds to $⟨A_{\xi }X,Y⟩=⟨II(X,Y),\xi ⟩$. For the outward unit normal of a unit sphere, $A_{\xi }=-I$ with this convention.

The Young–Laplace equation relates the pressure jump across a stationary interface to its curvature and surface tension. Choose a unit normal vector $\mathbf{n}$ pointing from the inside region to the outside region, and define $\kappa ={\nabla }_s\cdot \mathbf{n}$ to be positive for a convex sphere. In mechanical equilibrium, with constant surface tension and no additional normal viscous stresses,Here $k_1,k_2$ are the signed principal curvatures in this convention. Their sum is twice the corresponding signed mean curvature; stating the convention prevents a factor-of-two ambiguity. The Young–Laplace equation is a local normal stress balance for one interface. ^[ref]

A spherical liquid droplet of radius $R$ in a gas has one interface, with $k_1=k_2=1/R$. An ideal thin soap bubble has two liquid–gas interfaces. Adding their pressure jumps givesFor the soap bubble, $\Delta p$ now means the inner gas pressure minus the outer gas pressure. The second formula assumes equal surface tensions on both faces and film thickness negligible relative to $R$, so their radii can be identified. Retaining distinct radii gives $2\gamma /R_{\mathrm{inner}}+2\gamma /R_{\mathrm{outer}}$. A gas bubble inside bulk liquid has only one interface and therefore uses $2\gamma /R$. ^[ref]

With the assumed constant toy surface tension $\gamma =0.072\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, a droplet with $R=1\mathrm{mm}$ has excess pressure $144\mathrm{Pa}$; at $R=0.5\mathrm{mm}$ it has $288\mathrm{Pa}$. A thin soap bubble assigned the same $\gamma$ and $R=1\mathrm{mm}$ has excess pressure $288\mathrm{Pa}$. These are differences from the surrounding pressure, rather than absolute pressures. Halving the radius doubles the capillary pressure; doubling the interface count also doubles it at fixed radius and surface tension.

The spherical case has a short work argument. A virtual increase in radius gives $dV=4\pi R^{2}dR$ and $dA=8\pi RdR$. At mechanical equilibrium, the net pressure work balances the increase in surface energy:For a thin soap bubble, both interfaces gain approximately the same surface area, doubling the right-hand side and giving $4\gamma /R$. This is a virtual work balance between neighboring spherical configurations, rather than an assumption that a fixed-volume droplet actually expands. The general Young–Laplace equation replaces the spherical area-to-volume ratio by local curvature, making geometry directly measurable through pressure.

Consider an idealized planet that is a sphere of radius $R$, illuminated by parallel sunlight of irradiance $S$, measured on a plane perpendicular to the rays. Its intercepting projected area is $\pi R^2$, whereas its total surface area is $4\pi R^2$. Therefore the incoming power averaged per unit total surface area iswhere $\alpha$ is the broadband Bond albedo. The factor four is a sphere geometry result, not an atmospheric transmission factor. Local sunlight still varies over the illuminated hemisphere and vanishes on the dark side.

Now stipulate a single spatially uniform temperature $T$, no atmosphere, no internal heating, and emissivity one for outgoing thermal radiation. This is a thermal blackbody model using the Stefan–Boltzmann law; the prescribed solar-band reflection is treated separately, so the body is not a perfect absorber at all wavelengths. Let $C>0$ be the effective heat capacity per unit surface area, in $\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. Conservation of energy gives the ordinary differential equationHere $F$ is net heating per unit surface area, in $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, and $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Use $\sigma =5.670374419\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-4}$, rounded from the exact constant reported by NIST. ^[ref] The uniform temperature is a model assumption: generally the surface average of $T^4$ differs from the fourth power of the surface-average temperature.

For fixed Bond albedo $\alpha$, radiative equilibrium requires $F(T_{\ast })=0$, givingWith the illustrative solar constant $S=1360\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, the global incoming average is $340\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$:

Doubling albedo here lowers the equilibrium temperature by $33.231\mathrm{K}$, rather than halving it: the absorbed fraction changes from $0.7$ to $0.4$, and thermal radiation scales as $T^4$. These stipulated Bond albedos are whole-planet examples, not measurements of bare water and ice. The model predicts neither Earth's modern surface temperature nor its response to actual climate change; it omits the greenhouse effect, spatial heat transfer and seasons.

Each fixed-albedo equilibrium is a stable equilibrium: for $T_{\ast }>0$, the derivative is $F^{\prime }(T_{\ast })=-4\sigma T_{\ast }^3<0$. A small temperature increase produces net cooling, and a small decrease produces net heating. This is the simplest expression of the stabilizing Planck feedback. Allowing albedo to fall with temperature adds a competing term, as in ice-ocean albedo feedback.

Write each sphere as two disks, $S^2=D_{-}^2\cup D_{+}^2$. In their product, $D_{-}^2\times D_{-}^2$ is a zero-handle; $D_{+}^2\times D_{-}^2$ and $D_{-}^2\times D_{+}^2$ are two-handles. Their attaching circles are the core circles of the complementary solid tori in $\partial (D^2\times D^2)$, hence a Hopf link. Constant normal directions from the disk factors give both components the zero Seifert framing. The remaining $D_{+}^2\times D_{+}^2$ is a four-handle. This product construction establishes the actual diffeomorphism type, rather than relying on its intersection form alone. The resulting intersection matrix is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$.

Extend the velocity rigidly through a moving sphere in an incompressible tube flow. The extended velocity is continuous and divergence-free, so its total flux is independent of height. Quiescent far-field conditions make this flux zero. The sphere contributes $V_z{A}_s$ through a cross-section; the rotational contribution integrates to zero over its circular slice. Thus the fluid flux compensates the solid displacement. A descending sphere generates upward fluid flux in every section cutting its interior. This statement assumes a localized flow with no imposed throughflow and negligible tube-end effects.