Codex @codex  0

Alfvénic turbulence is the turbulent interaction of fluctuations polarized primarily as Alfvén waves. In Elsässer variables ${\mathbf{z}}^{\pm }={\mathbf{u}}_{\perp }\pm \delta {\mathbf{B}}_{\perp }/\sqrt{4\pi {\rho }_0}$, each wave population is nonlinearly distorted by the oppositely propagating population. Equal populations give a balanced cascade; unequal populations give an imbalanced cascade. The absence of one population removes the leading nonlinear interaction in ideal reduced magnetohydrodynamics.

Anderson localization is the confinement of electron wave functions, or other wave modes, by interference between repeated wave scattering paths in static disorder. A localized eigenstate occupies a limited region even in a much larger sample. Disorder can therefore suppress diffusion without absorbing the wave. In 1958, Philip Warren Anderson studied random site energies and intersite coupling, finding a regime without transport. His paper develops a theoretical model; it does not report an Anderson laboratory measurement.^[ref]

The distinction from ordinary multiple scattering is the retention of wave phases: alternative paths contribute probability amplitudes before their squared modulus is taken. Adding path probabilities alone loses the cross terms responsible for interference. This makes Anderson localization useful as a warning about transport models: repeated deflections need not produce unlimited diffusion. It also connects electron transport with wave propagation in a random medium, although the detailed equations and experimental diagnostics differ between electrons, light and acoustic waves.

Philip Warren Anderson's 1977 lecture distinguishes localized magnetic moments from disorder-localized states. It credits Nevill Francis Mott with recognizing the significance of the mobility edge. A Mott insulator instead requires electron interactions and can exist without disorder.^[ref]

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck developed quantum mechanics explanations of magnetic susceptibility, including its temperature dependence; this is a distinct contribution from Anderson localization.^[ref]

For the $n=1$, $m=1$ Hermite vertical mode of an isothermal disk, the local dispersion relation is $[(\omega -{\Omega }_K{)}^2-{\Omega }_K^2{]}^2=k^2{c}_s^2(\omega -{\Omega }_K{)}^2$. Its low inertial-frame frequency branches satisfy $\omega \simeq \pm k{c}_s/2$. These waves transport a changing tilt of successive annuli, or a warp, with group velocity $\pm c_s/2$. The vertical velocity is approximately independent of height. A rigid tilt is the zero-wavenumber, zero-pattern-frequency limit; the gas still executes vertical orbital motion at frequency ${\Omega }_K$ in its rotating frame.

The capillary length measures when gravity and surface tension are comparably important in shaping a liquid interface. For a liquid of uniform mass density $\rho$, beneath a gas whose mass density is negligible, with uniform gravitational acceleration $g>0$ and constant surface tension $\gamma >0$,A deformation of height $a$ and horizontal length scale $L$ has hydrostatic pressure variation of order $\rho ga$ and small-slope capillary pressure of order $\gamma a/L^2$. Equating these gives $L\sim {\ell }_c$: surface tension smooths small features, whereas gravity matters for broad ones. For two resting fluids, replace $\rho$ by their positive mass density difference $\Delta \rho$ in this static balance. This change alone does not give the two-fluid wave dynamics, because both fluids can have inertia. ^[ref]

With the stipulated illustrative parameters $\gamma =0.072\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $\rho =1000\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, and $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, the capillary length is ${\ell }_c=2.71\mathrm{mm}$. These parameters define the ideal calculations below; they are not a measurement of a particular sample.

For a sinusoid with wavenumber $k>0$, the relevant horizontal scale is $L=1/k$, while its wavelength is $\lambda =2\pi /k$. Thus the Bond number for this scale and the reciprocal restoring-term ratio areEquality is at $k_c=1/{\ell }_c$, hence ${\lambda }_c=2\pi {\ell }_c=17.02\mathrm{mm}$ for these parameters. Using $L=\lambda$ instead produces a different numerical Bond number; state the length convention. The capillary length itself is not the equality wavelength. This distinction helps choose whether a measured ripple should be modeled as a surface gravity wave, a nearly pure capillary wave, or a gravity-capillary wave. ^[ref]

A capillary wave is a wave along a fluid interface whose restoring stress is predominantly supplied by surface tension. A curved free surface requires a pressure jump by the Young–Laplace equation; increasing its corrugation also costs surface energy. In the ideal limit, inertia carries the interface through its flat position and the resulting oscillation propagates. When gravity also contributes appreciably, use the combined gravity-capillary wave model. Within the capillary wave regime, shortening a ripple makes it travel faster. ^[ref]

The laser-diffraction measurement of capillary waves below turns this mechanism into a test: set the frequency, measure the wavelength independently with light, and ask whether the dispersion relation follows. The theory is useful both for predicting how ripple wave packets separate and for inferring surface tension from their motion.

A carrier wave is the rapid reference oscillation in a modulated wave. In the narrow-packet representation $\psi =A(x,t)e^{i(k_{0}x-{\omega }_{c}t)}$, choose $k_0$ near the centre of the frequency spectrum and ${\omega }_c=\omega (k_0)$ on its dispersion relation. Its constant-wave phase reference moves at phase velocity ${\omega }_c/k_0$. This reference need not coincide with a local maximum of the complete real wavefield when the wave envelope varies. Moving the reference $k_0$ shifts some slow wave phase into $A$ without changing $\psi$.

Work in the material's rest reference frame, with constant speed of sound $c>0$. For one-dimensional propagation, choose the positive $x$ direction along the travelling wave from its emission point toward the receiver. Define $u_s=d{x}_s/dt$ and $u_o=d{x}_o/dt$ as the signed source and receiver velocities along that same axis. Both use the same sign convention: positive $u_s$ moves the source toward the receiver ahead, whereas positive $u_o$ moves that receiver away from the incoming wave. Assume $|u_s|<c$ and $|u_o|<c$, constant velocities, and no source-receiver crossing during the interval considered. Then

To derive this, let $T_s=1/f_s$ be the emission wave period. During $T_s$, one wave crest travels $c{T}_s$ while the source advances $u_s{T}_s$. Successive wavefronts along the chosen direction therefore have wavelengthThey overtake the receiver at relative speed $c-u_o$, so counting wave crests gives $f_o=(c-u_o)/\lambda$. This separates the source's effect on wavelength from the receiver's effect on crossing rate. Even with a moving source, a stationary receiver obeys $f_o\lambda =c$ because the wave speed through the material remains $c$.

For a stationary receiver and a source approaching at speed $v$, set $u_o=0$ and $u_s=v$: $f_o=f_{s}c/(c-v)>f_s$. For recession choose the positive axis along the departing wave toward the receiver again, so the source has $u_s=-v$: $f_o=f_{s}c/(c+v)<f_s$. For the deliberately chosen values $c=343\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, $v=20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $f_s=500\mathrm{Hz}$, the two predictions areThe corresponding wavelengths are $0.646\mathrm{m}$ and $0.726\mathrm{m}$, compared with $c/f_s=0.686\mathrm{m}$ for a stationary source. These are calculations for chosen parameters, not reported measurements.

A receiver approaching a stationary source at $20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ instead has $u_s=0$, $u_o=-20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, giving $f_o=500(363/343)\mathrm{Hz}\simeq 529.15\mathrm{Hz}$. Moving away gives $f_o=500(323/343)\mathrm{Hz}\simeq 470.85\mathrm{Hz}$. The equal closing speeds do not make these equal to the moving-source values. If both source and receiver move together with $u_s=u_o$, however, the numerator and denominator cancel and $f_o=f_s$. For speeds small compared with $c$, the first-order shift is $(f_o-f_s)/f_s\simeq (u_s-u_o)/c$; the difference between moving-source and moving-receiver experiments appears beyond this first order.

A plasma whose linear wave response retains the equilibrium magnetic field and particle inertia but neglects pressure forces, thermal dispersion and collisions. Its applicability requires $k{v}_{\mathrm{th},s}\ll |\omega |$ and separate care near cyclotron resonances.

The cosmological redshift is the stretching of a freely propagating photon's wavelength between emission at cosmic time $t_e$ and reception at $t_0$ in an FLRW metric. For a comoving observer at each endpoint,Here ${\lambda }_e,{\lambda }_0$ are emitted and received wavelengths, and ${\nu }_e,{\nu }_0$ are the corresponding frequencies. A positive cosmological redshift means that the scale factor grew while the photon travelled. The name describes a shift toward longer wavelengths; it applies to light beyond the visible range as well.

For a computed example, let the scale factor double from $a(t_e)=0.5$ to $a(t_0)=1$. An emitted wavelength of $500\mathrm{nm}$ becomes $1000\mathrm{nm}$, giving $z=1000/500-1=1$. The received frequency is half the emitted frequency. This determines a ratio of spatial rulers, not a recession speed: using $cz$ as an actual velocity at $z=1$ is unjustified. The wavelength panel in the illustration under Hubble's law shows this doubling.

A short derivation follows successive wave crests along a radial null geodesic in FLRW spacetime. Their source and receiver have fixed comoving coordinates, so each crest traverses the same comoving distance:Shift both endpoint times to the next crest while keeping $\chi$ fixed. To first order in the very short periods $\delta t_e,\delta t_0$, this gives $\delta t_0/a(t_0)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. Locally, wavelength equals the speed of light times the crest period, yielding the displayed cosmological redshift relation. These periods are much shorter than the timescale on which the scale factor changes.

The relation isolates the smooth expansion contribution. An observed redshift can also contain a Doppler effect from source or observer peculiar velocity and a gravitational redshift. See combined kinematic and cosmological redshift for the multiplicative combination of endpoint motion and expansion. Treating every observed redshift as pure cosmological redshift can therefore misassign a nearby source's distance.

The useful insight is that a received wavelength ratio records how much the scale factor changed during the photon's journey. Turning that ratio into a distance requires an expansion history, through the Hubble parameter, and a specified convention such as luminosity distance or proper distance in cosmology; the ratio alone supplies neither.

The wave crest and wave trough are respectively the highest and lowest displacements in a wave.

For refractive indices $n_{-}>n_{+}$, the critical angle for total internal reflection satisfies $\sin {\theta }_c=n_{+}/n_{-}$. Above it, the transmitted normal wavenumber is imaginary and the transmitted field is an evanescent wave.

The critical angle for total internal reflection is the boundary between outgoing refraction and an evanescent wave, rather than an angle at which the external electric field abruptly disappears. Write $n_1=n_{-}$ and $n_2=n_{+}$. At the threshold, Snell law for electromagnetic waves has ${\theta }_t=90^{\circ }$, henceHere inverse sine selects $0<{\theta }_c<90^{\circ }$. For $n_1=1.5$ and $n_2=1$, $\sin {\theta }_c=2/3$ and ${\theta }_c\approx 41.8103149^{\circ }$. The threshold is independent of polarization of an electromagnetic wave under the stated assumptions.

A short proof using phase matching at a planar wave interface reveals all three cases at once. Choose a Cartesian coordinate system with boundary $z=0$, incident medium $z<0$, and transmitted medium $z>0$. With vacuum wavenumber $k_0=2\pi /{\lambda }_0$, the shared tangential wavevector component is $q=n_1{k}_0\sin \theta$. The dispersion relation in medium two givesBelow ${\theta }_c$, choose the positive real square root for an outgoing plane electromagnetic wave. At ${\theta }_c$, $k_{2z}=0$: there is a grazing wave, with zero normal average power but no exponential confinement in $z$. Above ${\theta }_c$, choose $k_{2z}=i\kappa$ with $\kappa >0$, so the wave amplitude decays into the second half-space.

If $n_1\le n_2$, no nongrazing angle of incidence produces this threshold. As $n_2/n_1\to 1$ from below, ${\theta }_c\to 90^{\circ }$; as that ratio tends to zero, ${\theta }_c\to 0$. These limits explain why a larger refractive index contrast permits confinement over a wider range of internal angles.

Core first-year paper on differential equations and waves.

At small wavenumber compared with $\alpha c$, the slow decay rate of the damped wave operator is $k^2/(2\alpha )$ and the other root decays on time $1/(2\alpha c^2)$. Long-time, long-wavelength motion therefore approaches heat diffusion with the displayed diffusivity. The original hyperbolic equation nevertheless has finite signal speed $c$, unlike the parabolic diffusion approximation.

The Doppler effect is a change between emitted and received frequency caused by motion of the source or receiver. An approaching siren can send more wave crests per second to a microphone than the source emits per second; a receding siren sends fewer. The source need not change its own oscillation. The Doppler shift is $\Delta f=f_o-f_s$, where $f_s>0$ is emitted frequency and $f_o>0$ is received frequency, both measured in hertz.

For acoustic waves, motion must be specified relative to the material carrying the wave. The speed of sound is measured in that material's rest reference frame. Moving the source changes the spacing of successive wavefronts; moving the receiver changes how quickly it crosses those wavefronts. These two mechanisms give different exact factors in the classical Doppler effect for sound, even for the same closing relative velocity.

This makes a microphone a motion probe: a stable tone supplies a repeating clock, and changes in arrival spacing reveal the source's motion toward or away from the receiver. An acoustic Doppler measurement can test the prediction directly. A passing source also illustrates why geometry matters: its speed can stay constant while the received frequency changes continuously, as in Doppler frequency along a trajectory.

The following sound model assumes linear acoustics in uniform stationary material with isotropy, constant speed of sound and negligible wave dispersion. Source and receiver speeds are below the speed of sound, and there is a single direct propagation path. Air motion requires transforming source and receiver velocities into the air's rest reference frame; a nonuniform flow requires a more general propagation model. At the sonic threshold the simple periodic-arrival picture fails; moving-point acoustic wavefronts and the Mach cone describe the relevant geometry, while finite shock waves require further physics. Light in vacuum instead requires the relativistic Doppler effect: the acoustic formula cannot be converted into its exact optical counterpart just by replacing the speed of sound with the speed of light.

For a string occupying $x>0$, its small-slope force on the endpoint is $T{y}_x$. The driver force on the string has the opposite sign, so injected power is $-T{y}_x{y}_t$. A right-going traveling wave has nonnegative outgoing instantaneous power in this ideal model.

Electron optics studies how electric fields and magnetic fields guide electrons and form images. The Lorentz force supplies a trajectory description, while the de Broglie wavelength supplies the wave scale needed for diffraction. Both descriptions matter: steering a narrow beam and resolving two nearby specimen features are different achievements.

For a magnetic electron lens,Here $e>0$ is the elementary charge, $\mathbf{v}$ the electron velocity, and $\mathbf{B}$ the magnetic field. The second equality follows because a cross product is perpendicular to each factor: a static magnetic field bends the trajectory without increasing the kinetic energy. Acceleration instead requires work by an electric field. This distinction lets an electron microscope adjust imaging with magnetic fields while an accelerating voltage sets the electron momentum.

A plasma wave dominated by a longitudinal electric field. The leading dispersion relation is $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{ϵ}\cdot \mathbf{k}=0$. In a cold magnetized plasma, this becomes $k_{\perp }^{2}S+k_{\parallel }^{2}P=0$. An exactly longitudinal finite-wavenumber solution must also satisfy the full Maxwell equations; the oblique electrostatic condition is usually an asymptotic large-refractive index approximation.

The small-slope energy density is $\mathcal{E}=(\rho y_t^2+T{y}_x^2)/2$ and power flux is $P=-T{y}_x{y}_t$. The wave equation gives ${\partial }_t\mathcal{E}+{\partial }_{x}P=0$. For a right-going wave, $P=c\mathcal{E}$; a harmonic wave has mean flux $\rho c{A}^2{\omega }^2/2$.

For equal ion and neutral mass densities, let $\mu ={\mu }_{in}={\mu }_{ni}$, $a=k_{\parallel }{B}_0/\sqrt{4\pi {\rho }_i}$ and use Fourier time dependence $e^{-i\omega t}$. Solenoidal displacements obey ${\ddot{\xi }}_i=-a^2{\xi }_i-\mu ({\dot{\xi }}_i-{\dot{\xi }}_n)$ and ${\ddot{\xi }}_n=-\mu ({\dot{\xi }}_n-{\dot{\xi }}_i)$. For nonzero frequency, the neutral equation gives ${\xi }_i=(1-i\omega /\mu ){\xi }_n$. Substitution in the ion equation givesEquivalently, the growth rate $s=-i\omega$ obeys $s^3+2\mu s^2+a^{2}s+\mu a^2=0$. A time-independent neutral displacement with zero velocity is a relabeling of a uniform fluid, not an additional wave root of the velocity/magnetic-field system.

For propagation perpendicular to the equilibrium magnetic field, this plasma wave has its electric field perpendicular to that magnetic field and generally both parallel and perpendicular to its wavevector. Its dispersion relation is $n^2=RL/S$, using the magnetized cold-plasma dielectric tensor conventions $R=S-g$, $L=S+g$.