William Lawrence Bragg introduced the plane interpretation; his father William Henry Bragg built the X-ray spectrometer. Their joint 1913 paper, The Reflection of X-rays by Crystals, reports the experiment. [ref] [ref]
An X-ray tube supplied radiation through lead slits to a crystal mounted with its cleavage face through the rotation axis. A rotating ionization chamber replaced a spectrometer telescope; electric current measured the scattered signal, and a circular scale supplied angular readings. They first scanned the chamber at fixed crystal orientation, then swept crystal and chamber together to follow the reflection. [ref]
Changing chamber gas checked detector dependence; readings on opposite sides checked face-setting errors. Repeated peaks with sines of half-deflections in integer ratios, together with matching absorption coefficients, distinguished repeated diffraction orders of the same wavelength from different radiation components. Comparing crystal faces constrained interplanar spacings. Their limits included slit broadening, face alignment and incomplete interception at glancing incidence; assigning absolute wavelengths still required a structural choice for . [ref]
William Lawrence Bragg's 1913 structure paper connects a slit-selected beam, an oriented crystal and an ionization chamber to strength-versus-angle curves. Repeated sine ratios and matching absorption coefficients identify common radiation. Narrower slits resolve blended lines. Absolute wavelengths remain undetermined there; intercrystal comparisons first give relative scales. The Bragg crystal reflection experiment of 1913 covers the alignment controls.[ref]
William Henry Bragg's 1915 Bakerian lecture, X-rays and Crystal Structure, separates the geometric and intensity arguments. Its Figure 9 compares reflection positions and strengths from three sodium chloride orientations; odd and even diffraction orders differ in strength along one orientation. The interpretation uses alternating scattering layers. Later, the calcite example identifies an internal oxygen coordinate that symmetry alone cannot fix. Improved wave intensity measurements revise a previously rough estimate. Thus a lattice assignment can precede determination of positions inside the unit cell; intensity interpretation also has experimental and theoretical limits. This is the father's 1915 lecture, distinct from the joint 1913 reflection paper.[ref]
Construct an original illustrative spectrum using ordinary frequency detuning . Write the longitudinal Doppler shift in frequency units as , where . Choose a normal distribution with standard deviation and a weak-probe Lorentzian line shape with half width at half maximum :
Thus . Choose and natural linewidth , so . The Gaussian-only full width at half maximum is ; the averaged profile also includes the finite Lorentzian line shape width.
Add a deliberately phenomenological Lamb dip:
Here is the absorption coefficient normalized to the pump-off line-centre value. The factor is chosen, not inferred from populations or a fit. The dip's assigned full width at half maximum borrows the single-atom power broadening scale purely to illustrate contrast versus width. It is not the preceding overlap integral or a fit to historical spectra. There are no crossover features in this isolated-transition toy spectrum.
For , the subtracted dip has depth and width ; for , depth and width . Its half-depth points are . Measure that width relative to the curved background , not a horizontal line through the total absorption minimum.
Figure 1.
Chosen Doppler envelope and phenomenological Lamb dips
. Original numerical Gaussian velocity average with two explicitly chosen Lorentzian absorption dips. Every numerical setting is illustrative. The right panel magnifies line centre; these curves are not experimental data or fits. Details.
For a chosen cell optical depth , the line-centre pump-off transmission is . At it is . The transmitted probe therefore increases by about percent relative to pump off. Absorption contrast, transmission contrast and spectral width are three different quantities.
In the 2013 calibration study, six horizontal light-emitting diodes per module on string 63 flashed sequentially; other strings recorded charges and photon arrival times. A global fit inferred depth-dependent scattering of light and absorption coefficients. Dust-logger measurements checked layer structure; independent muon events tested simulated time patterns. Photomultiplier response and refrozen ice near modules remained limitations. Thus a late hit need not imply a late interaction: scattering of light changes the path.[ref]
An original limiting calculation isolates this issue. Suppose a compact source emits at time into homogeneous, nondispersive ice with stipulated refractive index . At distance , the unscattered light arrives at
where is the vacuum speed of light. For chosen , the delay is . A scattered path longer adds even with perfect clocks. These chosen values are not calibration measurements. Real ice requires wavelength-dependent propagation, module response and a spatially varying light-transport model; replacing that response by one arrival time discards information.
The imaginary part of the complex refractive index makes wave amplitude decay as . Since intensity is proportional to amplitude squared, its absorption coefficient is .
Let the source's hydrogen-ionizing photon production rate be
where is the hydrogen ionization energy. The idealized Strömgren sphere has an almost fully ionized interior and a thin ionization front. In photoionization equilibrium, every ionization is balanced by a Case B recombination, so spherical symmetry gives
For pure hydrogen of constant number density , the interior has , and the Strömgren radius is therefore
Now let the effective number of dust grains per hydrogen nucleus be , so the dust absorption coefficient is . If is the ionizing-photon rate crossing the sphere of radius , recombinations and dust absorption give the linear ordinary differential equation
If denotes a dust mass fraction instead, the grain mass and gas mean particle mass are simply absorbed into the effective product . Define the dust optical depth
Multiplication by the integrating factor and integration to the dusty front gives its governing equation
The exponential function weights recombinations at large optical depth by the extra source photons that dust must remove before those photons reach that radius.
For constant , put and . The elementary integral
reduces the equation to
Equivalently, with and ,
Its dust-free limit is , while absorption makes for nonzero dust abundance.
Choose a closed two-level system, equal stimulated absorption and emission strengths, a monochromatic pump, and no extra dephasing. Let be the lower and upper populations, and let spontaneous emission remove upper population at rate . In this convention the natural linewidth is full width at half maximum in angular frequency, its half width at half maximum is , and its full width at half maximum in hertz is . All below are angular detunings.
Let be the on-resonance saturation parameter. An effective stimulated transition rate that reproduces the monochromatic steady response is
Here describes each stimulated direction, while describes irreversible spontaneous emission. The rate equation gives the steady populations; it is not a description of transient Rabi oscillations. Setting gives
and the population difference relevant to net weak-probe photon absorption is
The pump depletes the lower population by , but reduces the population difference by : stimulated emission contributes as well as missing ground-state absorbers. On resonance, gives , , ; gives , , . As , the two populations approach , rather than producing a population inversion. Far off resonance, and .
For moving atoms use in these pump-prepared populations. A weak counterpropagating probe interrogates them near . A simple population-only approximation to its absorption coefficient averages the weak-probe Lorentzian line shape times over the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. It neglects interference between the beams, changes of velocity during illumination, and multilevel optical pumping. Those restrictions matter for real alkali chemical atoms.