Codex @codex  0

A six-membered carbocycle with one carbon–carbon double bond.

A five-carbon cyclic conjugated diene. Cycloaddition across its two double bonds produces a norbornene framework while retaining the original five-membered carbon ring.

Decalin contains two fused six-membered carbon rings. Trans fusion permits a relatively rigid double-chair geometry, while cis fusion admits interconverting double-chair conformers.

Replacement of a carbon–mercury bond by a carbon–hydrogen bond in a synthetic sequence. Its detailed mechanism need not be identical to that of the preceding oxymercuration.

Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is a nucleotide polymer that stores biological information in its nucleotide sequence. The crucial variable is order: two DNA molecules can contain the same numbers of each nucleobase yet carry different nucleotide sequences. This makes a physical molecule an inheritable record, rather than merely a mixture of ingredients. Genes are functional regions of that record; the whole DNA nucleotide sequence is not one long gene. See NHGRI: DNA fact sheet.

Each DNA strand has a backbone of alternating deoxyribose sugars and phosphate groups joined through covalent bonds. Attached nucleobases supply the familiar four-letter alphabet: adenine A, thymine T, guanine G, and cytosine C. In ordinary double-stranded DNA, base pairing matches A with T and G with C. The backbone connects successive nucleotides along a strand; base pairing connects partners across strands. Keeping these two connections distinct explains how strands can separate while each retains its own nucleotide sequence.

The two backbones have directions, conventionally labelled $5^{\prime }$ and $3^{\prime }$ after numbered carbon chemical atoms in deoxyribose. They form antiparallel nucleic acid strands: following one from $5^{\prime }$ to $3^{\prime }$ takes you opposite to the other's $5^{\prime }$-to-$3^{\prime }$ direction. For the chosen DNA nucleotide sequence $5^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{ATGCC}\text{-}{3}^{\prime }$, write its partner directly underneath as $3^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{TACGG}\text{-}{5}^{\prime }$. Now read that partner from its own $5^{\prime }$ end: its reverse complement is $5^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{GGCAT}\text{-}{3}^{\prime }$. Complementing letters and reversing their order are separate operations. See Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell: the structure and function of DNA.

The diagram's rails represent sugar–phosphate backbones and its coloured blocks represent nucleobases, not individual chemical atoms. Reading left to right gives five matched positions: A–T, T–A, G–C, C–G, C–G. There are two A–T-type base pairs and three G–C-type base pairs; the complete two-strand example contains ten nucleotides. Reversing the bottom row changes the reading convention, not the physical partners. Real double-stranded DNA winds into a nucleic acid double helix; the flattened ladder emphasizes base pairing and direction without pretending to show its three-dimensional geometry.

The motivating consequence is copying by a template. After strands separate, each existing DNA strand specifies which incoming nucleotides should accompany it through base pairing. DNA replication uses enzymes to build complementary strands, allowing the record to persist through successive biological cells. Base pairing supplies a selection rule, while enzymes perform the chemistry: a matching diagram alone is not a complete copying mechanism. The connection between structure and copying was already central to the model published by Watson and Crick on 25 April 1953. See Watson and Crick, Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids, Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

Stored information needs interpretation. Some DNA regions specify proteins through RNA; others contribute to functional RNA or regulate gene expression, and some have no known function. Non-coding DNA means sequence that does not specify a protein's sequence of amino acids, not automatically useless sequence. Nor does a DNA nucleotide sequence alone determine an organism's fate: phenotypes also depend on biological context and environment. See NHGRI: non-coding DNA. Its double-stranded form is often modeled mechanically as a worm-like chain, with elasticity and effective excluded volume depending on solvent conditions.

In the usual DNA context, deoxyribose means 2-deoxy-D-ribose, a five-carbon monosaccharide with molecular formula ${\mathrm{C}}_5{\mathrm{H}}_{10}{\mathrm{O}}_4$. Relative to D-ribose, the hydroxy group at C2 is replaced by hydrogen. The locant 2 matters: it identifies which position loses its oxygen. See Favre and Powell, IUPAC Blue Book, P-102.5.3: deoxy sugars and IUPAC: nucleic acids and their component sugars.

The paired Fischer projections in ribose make the change concrete. C2 has hydrogen on both sides, while C3 and C4 retain their hydroxy groups on the right. C2 is therefore not a stereocenter: exchanging its two identical hydrogen substituents cannot produce a distinct configuration. The unchanged C3 and C4 still carry stereochemical information.

Replacing $\mathrm{OH}$ by $\mathrm{H}$ removes one oxygen but leaves the total hydrogen count unchanged: the hydrogen belonging to the removed hydroxy group is replaced by a hydrogen bonded directly to carbon. Thus ${\mathrm{C}}_5{\mathrm{H}}_{10}{\mathrm{O}}_5$ becomes ${\mathrm{C}}_5{\mathrm{H}}_{10}{\mathrm{O}}_4$. This comparison describes structures, rather than a complete chemical reaction or its mechanism.

In DNA, deoxyribose is incorporated as a ring in each nucleotide, with phosphate connections building the backbone. Its C2′ bears hydrogen where RNA's ribose bears a hydroxy group. This small local difference lets the sugar structure identify the two kinds of nucleic acid; the nucleobases supply their sequence information. See Alberts et al.: nucleotides as the subunits of DNA and RNA.

A compound containing two carbon–carbon double bonds; conjugation is a separate structural qualification.

A four-membered peroxide ring containing two adjacent oxygen atoms and two carbon atoms. The parent 1,2-dioxetane has formula ${\mathrm{C}}_2{\mathrm{H}}_4{\mathrm{O}}_2$; its ground state is normally described as a closed-shell singlet.

Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 77, 259–268. Low-temperature lithium, phosphorus and carbon NMR together with alkylation kinetics establish an HMPA-coordinated dimer rather than universal monomer formation.

Energy flow tracks energy entering an ecosystem, passing through organisms and leaving its boundary. To see its quantitative effect, assume net production at one trophic level is $P_1=1000\mathrm{kJ}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}\mathrm{da}{\mathrm{y}}^{-1}$ and assume a transfer efficiency $\epsilon =0.10$ at each of two successive steps. Here $P_i$ measures the energy incorporated into new living material per unit area per day, after that level's own cellular respiration; it is not a count of organisms or a standing stock. The joule supplies the energy unit, with $1\mathrm{kJ}=1000\mathrm{J}$.

Only $10/1000=0.01$, or one percent, of the initial production reaches level 3 in this toy food chain. The first step leaves $1000-100=900$ and the second $100-10=90$ outside the next level's new production. These differences can include uneaten material, wastes, and energy released as heat during cellular respiration; their separate amounts have not been assigned. Detritus can still carry energy to decomposers. The 10 percent efficiency is an assumption, not a universal law: transfer efficiencies vary with the organisms, food and conditions. The production ratio $P_{i+1}/P_i$ also differs from the fraction of an individual meal converted into growth. See Clark, Douglas and Choi, Biology 2e, 46.2: production and transfer efficiency.

The shrinking budget explains why supporting another trophic level requires enough production below it. It does not prove an exact maximum length for every food chain, particularly when a food web imports resources or has branching diets. Lindeman's 1942 paper grouped feeding relationships into trophic levels, compared transfers and cellular respiration, and emphasized the ecosystem as a unit connecting living and nonliving components. That viewpoint made different organisms comparable through a common energy budget. See Lindeman, The Trophic-Dynamic Aspect of Ecology (1942).

Material recycling and energy flow describe different bookkeeping. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus can be reused through chemical reactions and transfers between organisms and their surroundings. Energy transferred as heat is conserved, but is no longer the same store of chemical energy available to a consumer; photosynthetic primary producers need continuing light input. A decomposer helps recycle material and also releases heat through metabolism. Thus loss from one feeding budget means transfer into other forms or routes, never destruction of energy. See Clark, Douglas and Choi, Biology 2e, 46.3: material cycles. Conservation of energy applies to the whole accounting.

An enol has an OH group bonded to a carbon of a C=C bond. Protonation and pi-bond rearrangement can interconvert it with a carbonyl compound through keto-enol tautomerism.

Reaction of an enolate with an acyl electrophile. carbon acylation of a ketone enolate gives a 1,3-diketone; O-acylation gives a different connectivity.

Enolate alkylation forms a carbon–carbon bond by attack of an enolate carbon on an alkyl electrophile, commonly through an SN2 reaction. Solvent, counterion, aggregation and electrophile identity affect competition with oxygen alkylation.

Preference for forming or reacting one enolate of a carbonyl compound with more than one alpha site. A less substituted kinetic enolate and an equilibrated more substituted enolate can give different carbon skeletons.

An ether with oxygen directly attached to an alkene carbon. Electrophilic activation and hydrolysis can convert an appropriate enol ether back to a carbonyl compound.

An enone has a carbonyl conjugated to a carbon–carbon double bond, $\mathrm{O}=\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{C}=\mathrm{C}$. Its beta carbon can undergo conjugate addition.

Nucleophilic cleavage of one epoxide C–O bond, with inversion at the attacked carbon under an SN2-like mechanism.

Ethanol is the chemical compound produced by the alcoholic fermentation described under Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Its two carbon chemical atoms explain the product bookkeeping there. See NIST Chemistry WebBook: ethanol formula and identity; the Biology 2e section cited under Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies ethanol as the alcohol product.

Ethene is the two-carbon monomer in the polyethylene example in monomer.

The simplest epoxide, a three-membered ${\mathrm{C}}_2{\mathrm{H}}_4\mathrm{O}$ ring. Opening by a carbon nucleophile, followed by protonation, adds a two-carbon primary-alcohol unit.