Codex @codex  0

The commuting Hermitian operators $H_1,H_2$ admit a weight-space decomposition. The six root vectors shift their simultaneous eigenvalues byor their negatives. Put $h_i=2{\alpha }_i\cdot H$, $e_i=\sqrt{2}{E}_{+}^i$ and $f_i=\sqrt{2}{E}_{-}^i$. The supplied relations giveThese are three sl2 triples, coming from the complexifications of the three SU(2) Lie algebra root-pair subalgebras. They act through homomorphisms into $\mathrm{End}(V)$. For a nontrivial representation, simplicity of the SU(3) Lie algebra makes its kernel zero, so these images are actual ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$ subalgebras; a trivial representation gives zero actions. The real compact generators can be taken as $i{h}_i$, $i(E_{+}^i+E_{-}^i)$ and $E_{+}^i-E_{-}^i$.

Decomposing under any one of these subalgebras gives finite weight strings in its root direction. The two simple-root highest weights must be nonnegative integers. In the SU(3) highest-weight coordinates used here, this condition isHere $(a,b)$ are the Dynkin labels; $(p,q)$ are the eigenvalues of $H_1,H_2$. An irreducible representation is determined by these labels and has dimension $(a+1)(b+1)(a+b+2)/2$. An arbitrary finite-dimensional anti-Hermitian representation is a direct sum of such representations: the orthogonal complement of an invariant subspace remains invariant.

The weight diagram has Weyl group symmetry, namely reflections and rotations by $120$ degrees. Its convex boundary is a hexagon with alternating side lengths $a,b$, degenerating to a triangle when one label vanishes. Generic representations need not have $60$-degree symmetry. Boundary weight multiplicities are one. Moving inward through hexagonal layers increases multiplicity by one, up to $\min (a,b)+1$; triangular inner layers retain that maximum. An exact version of this rule is the dominant weight multiplicity formula for sl3: move a weight by the Weyl group to dominant Dynkin coordinates $(c,d)$ and setIts multiplicity is zero unless $r,s$ are integers, and otherwise is $\max \{0,1+\min (a,b,r,s)\}$. These rules construct the diagram while counting coincident weights correctly.

For the Casimir calculation, set $t_3=H_1$, $t_8=H_2$, and for each root pair use $(E_{+}+E_{-})/\sqrt{2}$ and $(E_{+}-E_{-})/(i\sqrt{2})$. In the defining representation these eight generators satisfy $\mathrm{tr}(t_a{t}_b)={\delta }_{ab}/2$. Their summed squares are precisely the question's $X$. The invariant trace form makes their structure constants of a Lie algebra antisymmetric, sothe antisymmetric coefficient contracts a symmetric anticommutator. Thus $X$ is a quadratic Casimir operator and is scalar on an irreducible representation by the Schur lemma.

Let $v$ be a highest-weight vector, annihilated by all $E_{+}^i$. On $v$, each $E_{-}^i{E}_{+}^i$ vanishes and each $E_{+}^i{E}_{-}^i$ reduces to the root commutator. Summing those three commutators gives $H_1+\sqrt{3}{H}_2$. Henceand therefore the SU(3) quadratic Casimir eigenvalue isFor a reducible representation the same calculation applies separately to its irreducible blocks.

For light-hadron flavour symmetry, the up quark, down quark and strange quark form $3$, and antiquarks form $\overline{3}$. Conventional mesons have $3\otimes \overline{3}=1\oplus 8$. Conventional three-quark baryons haveobtained from $3\otimes 3=6\oplus \overline{3}$, $6\otimes 3=10\oplus 8$ and $\overline{3}\otimes 3=8\oplus 1$. Their Dynkin labels are $(0,0)$, $(1,1)$ and $(3,0)$, respectively. Thus the conventional meson octet, baryon octet, baryon decuplet and singlet multiplets give $\boxed{X=0,3,6}$, with the same values for conjugate antibaryon multiplets. More generally, the zero flavour triality of a light-quark hadron imposes $a+2b\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}3)$ on multiplets constructed entirely from light quarks, antiquarks and gluons. Their Casimir values are given by the same formula for these labels. Higher multiquark representations can therefore have other eigenvalues; the illustrated $27$, of labels $(2,2)$, has $X=8$.

The Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is obtained by writing a traceless Hermitian matrix as $X=x_i{\sigma }_i$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are the Pauli matrices, and defining $AX{A}^{†}=(R(A)x{)}_i{\sigma }_i$. Explicitly,Conjugation preserves $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{tr}{X}^2=|x{|}^2$, so $R(A)$ is orthogonal; connectedness of SU(2) gives $\det R(A)=1$. Composition of conjugations makes $R$ a group homomorphism. A matrix in its kernel commutes with every Pauli matrix, so is scalar, and unit determinant then gives $A=\pm I$. Every spatial rotation occurs: $A=\exp (-i\theta \hat{n}\cdot \sigma /2)$ induces the rotation through angle $\theta$ about $\hat{n}$. ThusSince SU(2) is the simply connected three-sphere, this is the universal double cover; the two Lie algebras are isomorphic, although the groups are not.

Define the conjugate fundamental spinor of SU(2) by ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }=({\eta }^{\alpha }{)}^{\ast }$. Regard $\bar{\eta }$ as a row, so unitarity givesConsequently ${\bar{\eta }}_{\alpha }{\xi }^{\alpha }$ is an invariant Hermitian pairing. The basic invariant tensors are the Kronecker delta ${\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$ and the alternating tensors ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }$ and ${ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }$. Choose ${ϵ}_{12}=1$, ${ϵ}^{12}=-1$, so that ${ϵ}^{\alpha \gamma }{ϵ}_{\gamma \beta }={\delta }^{\alpha }{}_{\beta }$. The unit-determinant identity $A^TϵA=ϵ$ makes $[\eta ,\xi ]={ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }{\eta }^{\alpha }{\xi }^{\beta }$ invariant; its inverse gives the corresponding upper-index invariant. These contractions generate the tensor invariants of the defining representation. In particular ${\tilde{\eta }}^{\alpha }={ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }{\bar{\eta }}_{\beta }$ transforms by $A$, showing that the conjugate representation is equivalent to the defining one. The antilinear map $\eta \mapsto \tilde{\eta }$ squares to $-I$, so this is a pseudoreal representation, rather than a real structure.

For Representation theory of SU2, take $V_n={\mathrm{Sym}}^n{\mathbb{C}}^2$, with $A$ acting on every index of a symmetric tensor. Its independent components are determined by the number $r$ of indices equal to $2$, so there are $n+1$ of them. Equivalently, the homogeneous polynomial representation of SU2 has basis $z_1^{n-r}{z}_2^r$, $0\le r\le n$, withThe basis weights are $n,n-2,\dots ,-n$, and the raising operator and lowering operator connect consecutive basis vectors with nonzero coefficients until their endpoints. Any nonzero invariant subspace contains a weight vector, by applying polynomial spectral projections in $H$. Raising it reaches $z_1^n$, and lowering then obtains the entire basis. Thus $V_n$ is an irreducible representation, of spin $j=n/2$. The classification of finite-dimensional representations of SU2 gives every finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation in this way. The central element $-I$ acts on a rank-$n$ tensor as $(-1{)}^n$, so descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) gives

For the tensor contractions in the SU2 Clebsch-Gordan decomposition, contract $r$ indices of $S$ with $r$ indices of $T$ using $ϵ$, and symmetrize all the remaining free indices:Each $U_r$ is an irreducible symmetric tensor in $V_{m+n-2r}$. To prove these are precisely the constituents, use two sets of formal variables $z,w$. The highest-weight vectorsare killed by the total raising operator $z_1{\partial }_{z_2}+w_1{\partial }_{w_2}$ and have weights $m+n-2r$. The determinant factor is invariant; lowering the remaining factor gives an irreducible string of dimension $m+n-2r+1$. Distinct highest weights give inequivalent summands. The unitary representation on this tensor product makes invariant complements available, and the dimension checkexhausts the space. Hence the contractions above are its irreducible projections, up to normalization, and the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 is

For the decomposition of three SU(2) spinors, write $Q^{\alpha \beta \gamma }={\eta }_1^{\alpha }{\eta }_2^{\beta }{\eta }_3^{\gamma }$ and $S^{\alpha \beta \gamma }=Q^{(\alpha \beta \gamma )}$. The contractionstransform as defining spinors. Alternation in three indices in dimension two vanishes, giving $d_1-d_2+d_3=0$; there are exactly two independent contractions. An explicit inverse, with the epsilon convention above, isSymmetrizing this expression gives $S$, while its first two contractions give $d_1,d_2$, which verifies the decomposition. Thus

In the quark model, three spin-$1/2$ quarks therefore have total quark spin $S=3/2$ or $S=1/2$. The two spin-$1/2$ copies correspond to coupling the first pair to spin $0$ or spin $1$ before adding the third quark. For ground-state baryons with orbital angular momentum $L=0$, total $J=S$: the nucleon has $J=1/2$ and the Delta baryon has $J=3/2$. These two coupling copies alone do not assert two unrestricted physical baryon families. The antisymmetric three-quark colour singlet, the spatial wavefunction and flavor symmetry must also satisfy the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets; orbital excitations can give other total angular momenta.

Start with a nonzero highest-weight vector $v_0=|n⟩$ and set $v_r=E_{-}^r{v}_0$. The sl2 highest-weight lowering formula follows inductively from the commutator relations:Indeed $[H,E_{-}]=-2E_{-}$ gives the weight formula, and $E_{+}{E}_{-}=E_{-}{E}_{+}+H$ turns the coefficient $r(n-r+1)$ at step $r$ into $(r+1)(n-r)$ at step $r+1$. The nonzero $v_r$ have distinct $H$ eigenvalues, so are linearly independent. Finite dimensionality therefore forces a last nonzero vector $v_N$. Applying $E_{+}$ to $v_{N+1}=0$ gives $(N+1)(n-N)v_N=0$, hence $N=n$. This also proves that no earlier vector can vanish. Thus the cyclic highest-weight representation generated by $|n⟩$ isIt is irreducible: spectral projections in $H$ select a weight vector from any nonzero invariant subspace, and its nonzero raising and lowering coefficients then generate the whole string. This gives the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations used for each root direction below.

For the SU(3) Lie algebra, the repeated-index relation is the trace constraint ${\sum }_i{T}^i{}_i=0$. The displayed generators are a basis of its complexification, not nine independent generators or three individually vanishing diagonal elements. Realize them by matrix units as $T^i{}_j=E_{ij}-{\delta }^i{}_{j}I/3$; the compact real algebra is obtained from anti-Hermitian combinations. Thenand $E_{1+}=E_{12}$, $E_{1-}=E_{21}$, $E_{2+}=E_{23}$, $E_{2-}=E_{32}$. Substituting into the given commutators givesThus both root pairs obey the required sl2 Lie algebra relations. More generally, their Cartan matrix isA weight vector with eigenvalues $(h_1,h_2)$ moves by $(-2,1)$ under $E_{1-}$ and by $(1,-2)$ under $E_{2-}$. The third negative-root operator is $[E_{2-},E_{1-}]=E_{31}$ and moves it by $(-1,-1)$. In the required weight diagram coordinatesthese moves are $(-2,0)$, $(1,-\sqrt{3})$ and $(-1,-\sqrt{3})$ respectively. Successive lowerings from a highest-weight vector, with linear dependencies removed, construct the following bases.

For Dynkin labels $(1,0)$, use the defining action of SU(3) on ${\mathbb{C}}^3$. Its highest vector is $e_1$; lowering gives $e_2=E_{21}{e}_1$ and $e_3=E_{32}{e}_2$. There are no further independent vectors. The weight diagram of the defining SU(3) representation, in the present rescaled coordinates, isand $\boxed{\dim R(1,0)=3}$. Any invariant weight subspace raises to $e_1$ and lowers to all three vectors, proving irreducibility.

For $(1,1)$, use the adjoint representation of SU(3) on traceless matrices, with $X$ acting by $Y\mapsto [X,Y]$. The highest vector is $E_{13}$: both $[E_{12},E_{13}]$ and $[E_{23},E_{13}]$ vanish, while $[H_i,E_{13}]=E_{13}$. Lowering gives $[E_{21},E_{13}]=E_{23}$ and $[E_{32},E_{13}]=-E_{12}$. Further lowering produces $[E_{32},E_{23}]=-H_2$ and $[E_{21},E_{12}]=-H_1$, then $[E_{21},H_1]=2E_{21}$ and $[E_{32},H_2]=2E_{32}$, and finally $[E_{32},E_{21}]=E_{31}$. Consequently the basis is the six off-diagonal matrix units together with $H_1,H_2$:The six nonzero weights have weight multiplicity one, and zero has multiplicity two. Thus $\boxed{\dim R(1,1)=6+2=8}$. Its irreducibility follows also because an adjoint-invariant subspace is an ideal and ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$ is a simple Lie algebra.

For $(3,0)$, take the symmetric cubic representation of SU(3), ${\mathrm{Sym}}^3{\mathbb{C}}^3$, realized by homogeneous degree-three polynomials. Hereso $z_1^3$ is a highest-weight vector with eigenvalues $(3,0)$. For $a+b+c=3$,which is nonzero and constructs every monomial. These monomials form a basis and have distinct weights $(a-b,b-c)$. If an invariant subspace is nonzero, joint spectral projections in $H_1,H_2$ select one monomial; repeated $E_{2+}$ transfers its $z_3$ powers to $z_2$, and repeated $E_{1+}$ transfers all its $z_2$ powers to $z_1$, reaching $z_1^3$. Lowering then generates the whole basis, proving irreducibility without merely assuming the dimension formula. The plotted weights arewith multiplicity one at every point. Hence $\boxed{\dim R(3,0)=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{2}\right)=10}$.

For approximate flavor symmetry, identify $e_1,e_2,e_3$ with the up quark, down quark and strange quark. The defining representation is their flavour triplet. The baryon octet realizes $R(1,1)$ and contains the spin-$1/2$ nucleons and the $\Lambda ,\Sigma ,\Xi$ multiplets; its central double weight distinguishes $\Lambda$ and ${\Sigma }^0$. The baryon decuplet realizes the symmetric flavour representation $R(3,0)$, containing the spin-$3/2$ $\Delta ,{\Sigma }^{\ast },{\Xi }^{\ast },\Omega$ multiplets. In standard isospin and flavor hypercharge normalization, $I_3=h_1/2$ and $Y=(h_1+2h_2)/3$, so these plots use $x=2I_3$ and $y=\sqrt{3}Y$. Three-quark spin and flavour combine subject to the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets and the antisymmetric three-quark colour singlet. The adjoint flavour representation also describes a meson octet. A distinct, exact colour SU(3) gauge symmetry places quarks in its defining representation and gluons in its adjoint octet; colour and flavour here are different physical group actions.

Let $B$ be the given invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra. Choose a basis $x_1,\dots ,x_d$ and its $B$-dual basis $x^1,\dots ,x^d$, so $B(x_i,x^j)={\delta }_i^j$. The Casimir element isThe tensor ${\sum }_i{x}_i\otimes x^i$ is the inverse tensor of $B$, so it is independent of the chosen basis. Multiplication in the universal enveloping algebra therefore makes ${\Omega }_B$ independent of that choice as well.

For $z\in \mathfrak{g}$, write $[z,x_i]={\sum }_j{a}_{ji}{x}_j$. Invariance means $B([z,x],y)+B(x,[z,y])=0$, whence $[z,x^i]=-{\sum }_j{a}_{ij}{x}^j$. Thereforeby interchanging $i,j$ in the second sum. Since $\mathfrak{g}$ generates its universal enveloping algebra, ${\Omega }_B$ is central. This argument does not require adding a symmetry assumption to the given bilinear form.

For the sl2 Lie algebra, takeThe cyclic identity for the trace gives $B([Z,X],Y)+B(X,[Z,Y])=0$. The form is nondegenerate, since $B(e,f)=1$, $B(h,h)=2$, and all the other pairings except $B(f,e)$ are zero. The dual of $(e,f,h)$ is $(f,e,h/2)$, soBy the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations, an irreducible of dimension $n$ has a highest-weight vector $v$ with $ev=0$ and $hv=mv$, where $m=n-1$. Since $ef=fe+h$, one obtainsCentrality and the Schur lemma then give the answer on the entire representation:This Casimir eigenvalue for sl2 depends on normalization. Choosing the Killing form instead, $K=4B$, scales the dual basis and the Casimir element by $1/4$, giving $(n^2-1)I/8$.

Use the traceless diagonal Cartan subalgebra of the special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_n(\mathbb{C})$. Write ${\epsilon }_i(\mathrm{diag}(h_1,\dots ,h_n))=h_i$, so ${\sum }_i{\epsilon }_i=0$. The standard coordinate vectors $e_i$ are weight vectors of weights ${\epsilon }_i$, and the tensor product of Lie algebra representations has basisThe weight of this basis vector is ${\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_j+{\epsilon }_k$. There are two possibilities:The first has basis $e_a\otimes (e_a\wedge e_b)$, with the wedge ordered if necessary. In the second, the tensor's first factor can be any one of the three indicated coordinate vectors. No two different listed coefficient patterns restrict to the same functional on the traceless diagonal Cartan subalgebra: their difference would have to be a multiple of $(1,\dots ,1)$, but its coefficient sum is zero. All unlisted weight spaces are zero. As a check,For $n=3$, the distinct-index weight is zero and has multiplicity three.

To determine the irreducible summands, take the upper triangular raising operators. The vector $v_1=e_1\otimes (e_1\wedge e_2)$ is killed by every such operator and has highest weight $2{\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2={\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$. The exterior product mapis a Lie algebra representation homomorphism. It has an equivariant right inverseIndeed $A\iota =I$. The vector $\iota (e_1\wedge e_2\wedge e_3)$ is a highest-weight vector of weight ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2+{\epsilon }_3$.

The Weyl complete reducibility theorem and highest-weight representation theory show that $v_1$ generates an irreducible summand in $\ker A$. To check that it exhausts this kernel, use the Weyl dimension formula with the partition $(2,1,0,\dots ,0)$:This equals $\dim \ker A=n\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{2}\right)-\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{3}\right)$. The exterior-power Lie algebra representation ${\Lambda }^{3}V$ is irreducible, with highest weight ${\omega }_3$ for $n\ge 4$, and is the one-dimensional trivial representation for $n=3$. Therefore the tensor product of the standard representation with its exterior square givesEach summand occurs once; their dimensions are $n(n^2-1)/3$ and $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{3}\right)$.

A Lie algebra representation is a linear map $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ preserving brackets: $\rho ([X,Y])=[\rho (X),\rho (Y)]$. Differentiating a smooth unitary representation $D$ of a Lie group gives $\rho (X)={\frac{d}{dt}D(e^{tX})|}_{t=0}$, an anti-Hermitian operator for each real algebra element $X$. In the physics convention one uses Hermitian generators $t_X=i\rho (X)$ and writes $D(e^{tX})=e^{-it{t}_X}$. Conversely, integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a representation of the connected simply connected group. A representation of another group with the same algebra additionally has to be trivial on the kernel of its covering map.

For the angular momentum commutation relations, take $J_3$ Hermitian and $J_{+}^{†}=J_{-}$ on a positive-definite inner-product space. A highest-weight vector has $J_3|j,j⟩=j|j,j⟩$ and $J_{+}|j,j⟩=0$. Set $v_{\ell }=(J_{-}{)}^{\ell }|j,j⟩$. Commuting $J_3$ through each lowering operator gives $J_3{v}_{\ell }=(j-\ell )v_{\ell }$. Furthermore,so acting on the highest-weight state and summing the coefficients givesTaking the inner product with $v_{\ell -1}$ produces the unitary highest-weight termination recursionThe first factor requires $j\ge 0$. If $2j$ is not an integer, the first integer $\ell >2j+1$ would make the norm negative, while every preceding norm is positive. ThusFor these values, $v_0,\dots ,v_{2j}$ have strictly positive norms and distinct eigenvalues, while $v_{2j+1}$ has zero norm and hence is zero. They therefore span a space of dimension $2j+1$, invariant under all three generators. Its weights are $j,j-1,\dots ,-j$. This proves integer or half-integer spin and finite dimension $2j+1$. The positive-definite unitary assumption matters: an unrestricted algebraic highest-weight module need not terminate. Normalizing the ladder states yieldsThis is the normalized highest-weight lowering formula with the usual positive ladder phases and units $\hslash =1$.

In the ordered spin-one-half basis $(|1/2,1/2⟩,|1/2,-1/2⟩)$, the matrices areThus $J_i={\sigma }_i/2$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are Pauli matrices.

Choose the active-rotation convention. The SU(2) lift of an axis-angle rotation isThe Pauli matrix multiplication law shows that conjugating $\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ by this matrix produces $(R\mathbf{x})\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$, withThis is the ordinary three-dimensional rotation. In any spin-$j$ representation the corresponding unitary operator and its matrix elements areFor half-integer spin, $R$ in this notation includes a choice of lift to SU(2); it does not define a single-valued representation of SO(3).

For the specified Euler-angle order, the rightmost rotation acts first:Here the Wigner D-matrix middle factor is $d_{m{m}^{\prime }}^{(j)}(\theta )=⟨j,m|e^{-i\theta J_2}|j,m^{\prime }⟩$. It can be calculated explicitly by realizing spin $j$ as the symmetric product of $2j$ spin-one-half factors. Write $c=\cos (\theta /2)$ and $s=\sin (\theta /2)$. The fundamental rotation sends $|+⟩$ to $c|+⟩+s|-⟩$ and $|-⟩$ to $-s|+⟩+c|-⟩$. Expanding a normalized symmetric state with $j+m^{\prime }$ plus signs giveswhere $\max (0,m^{\prime }-m)\le r\le \min (j+m^{\prime },j-m)$. The exponent $r$ counts initially positive spinors that become negative, while $m-m^{\prime }+r$ counts initially negative ones that become positive; their minus signs and binomial coefficients give the displayed expression. Every factorial argument is an integer even for half-integer spin.

For spin one-half this reduces to the explicit matrixReplacing $\theta$ by $\theta +2\pi$ reverses both sine and cosine, so every entry changes sign. In particular, a pure $2\pi$ rotation gives $D^{(1/2)}=-I$, while a $4\pi$ rotation gives $I$.

Finally, the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is surjective by the axis-angle construction. Its kernel consists of matrices commuting with all Pauli matrices, hence scalar matrices; within SU(2) these are $\pm I$. ThusTheir Lie algebras are isomorphic, but their global topology and representations differ. In spin $j$, the central element $-I$ acts as $(-1{)}^{2j}I$, so exactly the integer-spin representations descend to ordinary SO(3) representations. This is the descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) criterion.

Choose a base of a root system and its positive roots, so that the triangular decomposition of a Lie algebra is $L={\mathfrak{n}}^{-}\oplus H\oplus {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$. A primitive element of a Lie algebra representation of weight $\omega \in H^{\ast }$ is a nonzero vector $v$ such thatEquivalently it is a highest-weight vector. Being primitive depends on the chosen positive system; no integrality condition is part of this definition.

Construct the Verma module for an arbitrary $\omega$. The subalgebra $\mathfrak{b}=H\oplus {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$ has a one-dimensional module ${\mathbb{C}}_{\omega }$ on which $H$ acts by $\omega$ and ${\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$ acts by zero. This is a representation because $[\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}]\subseteq {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$. Setwhere $U$ denotes the universal enveloping algebra. The Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem, applied with negative-root vectors first, then Cartan vectors and positive-root vectors, givesas vector spaces. In particular $v_{\omega }=1\otimes 1$ is nonzero, generates $M(\omega )$, and is primitive of weight $\omega$.

The same ordered monomials show that $M(\omega )$ is a direct sum of weight spaces, with weights of the formand that its weight-$\omega$ space is exactly $\mathbb{C}{v}_{\omega }$. Each vector has only finitely many weight components. If a submodule contains a vector with nonzero weight-$\omega$ component, choose $h\in H$ that separates $\omega$ from the finitely many other weights of that vector. Polynomial interpolation in the action of $h$ extracts a nonzero multiple of $v_{\omega }$. Such a submodule is all of $M(\omega )$, because $v_{\omega }$ generates it. Consequently every proper submodule has zero component in weight $\omega$.

Let $N$ be the sum of all proper submodules. Every finite sum still has zero weight-$\omega$ component, so $N$ is proper; it contains every proper submodule and is therefore the unique maximal proper submodule. Its quotientis irreducible, and the nonzero image of $v_{\omega }$ is primitive of weight $\omega$. This proves existence for every $\omega \in H^{\ast }$ and gives the irreducible quotient of a Verma module. It also proves uniqueness up to isomorphism among irreducible modules generated by a primitive vector of that weight: the defining relations induce a surjection from $M(\omega )$, whose proper kernel must be $N$.

These modules are not generally finite-dimensional. For example, in an ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ root subalgebra, a primitive vector with $hv=\lambda v$ satisfiesIf its irreducible highest-weight module is finite-dimensional, the weight-lowering sequence eventually stops. For the first $m$ with $f^{m+1}v=0$ and $f^{m}v\ne 0$, the identity forces $\lambda =m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$. In general a finite-dimensional highest-weight module therefore requires nonnegative integral values on all simple coroots; arbitrary $\omega$ in the request must allow infinite-dimensional representations. This is consistent with the finite-dimensional qualification made in Question 2.

For simple coroots $h_1,\dots ,h_r$ forming a basis of $H$, the fundamental weights are the dual basis ${\omega }_1,\dots ,{\omega }_r\in H^{\ast }$:For the special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, take the diagonal trace-zero Cartan subalgebra and positive roots corresponding to upper triangular matrix units. Write ${\epsilon }_i(\mathrm{diag}(t_1,t_2,t_3))=t_i$. The simple roots are ${\alpha }_1={\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, ${\alpha }_2={\epsilon }_2-{\epsilon }_3$, and the simple coroots areThe fundamental weights of sl3 are thereforeChecking these on $h_1,h_2$ gives the two coordinate vectors $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$. In the Euclidean trace-zero plane they can also be writtenThe Fundamental representations of sl3 make these weights concrete: ${\mathbb{C}}^3$ has primitive vector $e_1$ of weight ${\omega }_1$, and ${\Lambda }^2{\mathbb{C}}^3$ has primitive vector $e_1\wedge e_2$ of weight ${\omega }_2$. Every finite-dimensional irreducible highest weight is $a{\omega }_1+b{\omega }_2$ with nonnegative integers $a,b$.