Codex @codex  0

Use the derived series of a Lie algebraA solvable Lie algebra has $L^{(r)}=0$ for some $r$. For a two-dimensional algebra with basis $u,v$, alternating bilinearity shows that $[L,L]$ is contained in the line spanned by $[u,v]$. A one-dimensional Lie algebra is abelian, so $[[L,L],[L,L]]=0$. Every two-dimensional complex Lie algebra is solvable, with derived length at most two. This dimension argument actually works over any field with the alternating definition of a Lie bracket.

There is a genuine qualification in the last request: the assertion about all Irreducible Lie algebra representations is true for finite-dimensional representations. Without that restriction, the infinite-dimensional simple module for the two-dimensional affine Lie algebra is a counterexample. Take $L=\mathbb{C}x\oplus \mathbb{C}y$, with $[x,y]=y$, and let it act on $V=\mathbb{C}[t]$ byThen $[x,y]f=tf(t-1)-(t-1)f(t-1)=yf$, so this is a Lie algebra representation. Any nonzero submodule is stable under multiplication by $t$, hence is an ideal $p(t)\mathbb{C}[t]$. Stability under $y$ implies $p(t)\mid p(t-1)$. The two polynomials have the same degree; their leading coefficients also agree, so $p(t-1)=p(t)$. In characteristic zero this forces $p$ to be constant. Thus $V$ is infinite-dimensional and irreducible, while $L$ is solvable. The literal unrestricted assertion is false.

Here is a proof of the intended finite-dimensional assertion, including the essential Lie theorem argument. We prove that a nonzero finite-dimensional representation $\rho :L\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ of a complex solvable algebra has a common eigenvector, by induction on $\dim L$. If $L=0$, any nonzero vector works. Otherwise $[L,L]\ne L$; choose a hyperplane $K$ containing $[L,L]$. It is a solvable ideal, and $L=K\oplus \mathbb{C}x$. Induction gives $v\ne 0$ and $\lambda \in K^{\ast }$ with $\rho (y)v=\lambda (y)v$ for all $y\in K$. Write $X=\rho (x)$ and suppress $\rho$ on elements of $K$.

Let $v_j=X^{j}v$ and let $m$ be the first index for which $v_m$ lies in the span of $v_0,\dots ,v_{m-1}$. The space $W=\mathrm{span}(v_0,\dots ,v_{m-1})$ is $X$-invariant. Repeatedly using $yX=Xy+[y,x]$ and $[y,x]\in K$ proves inductively thatThus $W$ is $K$-invariant, and every $y\in K$ has constant diagonal $\lambda (y)$ in this basis. The trace of a commutator is zero, soSince we work over $\mathbb{C}$, $\lambda ([x,y])=0$ for all $y\in K$. Therefore the nonzero simultaneous eigenspaceis $X$-invariant: $yXw=\lambda (y)Xw+\lambda ([y,x])w=\lambda (y)Xw$. A complex linear operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional space has an eigenvector. An eigenvector of $X{|}_{V_{\lambda }}$ is consequently a common eigenvector for $L$.

Its span is a one-dimensional submodule. If $V$ is irreducible, that span must be all of $V$. Hence every finite-dimensional irreducible representation of a finite-dimensional complex solvable Lie algebra has dimension one. Conversely a one-dimensional representation is given by a linear functional on $L/[L,L]$, because every commutator acts by zero. Passing repeatedly to quotients also gives the simultaneous triangularization of a Lie algebra representation. Neither the eigenvector step nor the trace argument extends to the infinite-dimensional counterexample above.

A Lie algebra representation $V$ is completely reducible when it is a direct sum of irreducible submodules. In finite dimension this is equivalent to saying that every submodule $W\subseteq V$ has an invariant complementary subspace. Indeed, one may split off a minimal nonzero submodule and induct on dimension; conversely, if $V$ is a finite sum of simple submodules, choose a maximal sum $U$ of these with $U\cap W=0$. If $W+U\ne V$, some simple summand $S$ is not contained in $W+U$. Then $S\cap (W+U)=0$ by simplicity, so $U+S$ is a larger sum disjoint from $W$, a contradiction. Thus $V=W\oplus U$.

We prove the required splitting by Haar averaging produces invariant complements. The structural input is the compact real form of a complex semisimple Lie algebra: there is a real semisimple algebra $\mathfrak{k}$ with $L=\mathfrak{k}\oplus i\mathfrak{k}$, whose simply connected integrating Lie group $K$ is compact. This structural fact is independent of the complete-reducibility assertion. One standard construction uses root vectors normalized so that $[e_{\alpha },e_{-\alpha }]=h_{\alpha }$, with real structure constants compatible with the involution $e_{\alpha }\mapsto -e_{-\alpha }$ and $h_{\alpha }\mapsto -h_{\alpha }$. The real spanis closed under brackets, complexifies to $L$, and has negative-definite Killing form. The compactness criterion for real semisimple Lie algebras then gives a compact simply connected $K$. Thus this route uses root structure and compact integration, not the theorem being proved.

Restrict $\rho :L\to {\mathrm{End}}_{\mathbb{C}}(V)$ to $\mathfrak{k}$. The integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a representation $R:K\to {\mathrm{GL}}_{\mathbb{C}}(V)$, since $K$ is simply connected. Choose any positive-definite Hermitian inner product $⟨,{⟩}_0$ and average using normalized Haar measure:The integral exists by compactness. It is positive-definite because $R(g)v\ne 0$ for $v\ne 0$, and it is $K$-invariant by translation invariance of Haar measure. Equivalently, every $\rho (a)$ with $a\in \mathfrak{k}$ is skew-Hermitian for this inner product.

Let $W$ be an $L$-submodule. It is invariant under $\mathfrak{k}$, hence under the exponentials generating the connected group $K$. For $v\in W^{\perp }$, $w\in W$ and $g\in K$,Consequently the orthogonal complement $W^{\perp }$ is $K$-invariant, and differentiation makes it $\mathfrak{k}$-invariant. It is a complex vector subspace, so it is also invariant under $i\mathfrak{k}$ and hence under $L$. Therefore $V=W\oplus W^{\perp }$ as $L$-modules.

Induction on $\dim V$ now expresses $V$ as a finite direct sum of irreducible submodules. Every finite-dimensional representation of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra is completely reducible. The compact real form need not be the real form originally used to present $L$; in particular the averaging argument does not require the given presentation to be unitary.

Use a real Lie algebra convention $[T_a,T_b]=f_{ab}{}^c{T}_c$. Its Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts on $\mathfrak{g}$ itself:Linearity is immediate. The Jacobi identity givesso $[{\mathrm{ad}}_X,{\mathrm{ad}}_Y]={\mathrm{ad}}_{[X,Y]}$, the defining Lie algebra representation condition. In the basis $T_b$, its matrix entries areThus the adjoint generators are the structure constants arranged as matrices. The representation has kernel equal to the center of a Lie algebra; it need not be faithful for an arbitrary algebra.

The Adjoint representation of a Lie group is ${\mathrm{Ad}}_g(Y)=gY{g}^{-1}$. It satisfies ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{gh}={\mathrm{Ad}}_g{\mathrm{Ad}}_h$, preserves the identity, and sends inverses to inverse matrices. Differentiating $e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}$ gives $[X,e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}]$, soConsequently the positive adjoint exponentials furnish the representation on elements $g=e^X$ and their products, and the intrinsic conjugation action defines it globally.

The inverse-conjugation formula in the PDF needs a minus adjoint exponent with this standard definition. Its first-order term is $Y-[X,Y]$, whereas $e^{+{\mathrm{ad}}_X}Y$ has first-order term $Y+[X,Y]$. For example $X=T_1,Y=T_2$ in a nonabelian algebra with $[T_1,T_2]\ne 0$ already distinguishes the two. The inverse conjugation and adjoint antirepresentations identity explains the group-order issue as well: $F(g)={\mathrm{Ad}}_{g^{-1}}$ satisfies $F(gh)=F(h)F(g)$. Retaining the printed inverse conjugation as a left action without this order reversal would not give an ordinary group representation.

The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formTo prove degeneracy for a non-semisimple Lie algebra, take its nonzero solvable radical and the last nonzero member $\mathfrak{a}$ of its derived series of a Lie algebra. This is a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra. For $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ maps $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and kills $\mathfrak{a}$. Every ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Hence ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ maps the full space into $\mathfrak{a}$ and has zero restriction there, so its trace is zero. Thus $B(x,y)=0$ for every $y$. This is the abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form argument, and establishes a nonzero kernel and vanishing determinant.

For a compact real semisimple Lie algebra, the adjoint action is unitary in an invariant positive inner product. Its infinitesimal generators are skew-Hermitian, givingStrictness follows because the adjoint kernel is the zero center. This explains the compactness criterion from the Killing form: “strictly negative” means negative-definite, not that every entry of its matrix is negative.

In the first three-generator example, take columns to be images of the basis $(X,Y,H)$. Direct use of the brackets givesTaking traces of products yields the Killing form for cyclic three-generator bracketsIt is nondegenerate, hence semisimple by the preceding degeneracy result, but it has mixed signature and is not compact. An explicit realization iswhich span the real traceless two-by-two matrices and satisfy exactly these brackets.

Changing the sign of $[X,H]$ changes the first and third adjoint matrices towhile ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ is unchanged. Nowthe negative-definite compact case. The basis $X=-i{\sigma }_1$, $Y=-i{\sigma }_2$, $H=-i{\sigma }_3$ realizes it as the real special unitary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Choose a positive system of a root system and the corresponding triangular decomposition of a Lie algebra $L={\mathfrak{n}}^{-}\oplus H\oplus {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$. A primitive element of a Lie algebra representation of weight $\omega \in H^{\ast }$ is a nonzero vector $v$ with $hv=\omega (h)v$ for every $h\in H$ and ${\mathfrak{n}}^{+}v=0$. Thus it is a highest-weight vector; the choice of positive roots is part of this definition. A highest-weight representation is generated by such a vector.

Let $\mathfrak{b}=H\oplus {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$ be the corresponding Borel subalgebra. Define its one-dimensional Lie algebra representation ${\mathbb{C}}_{\omega }$ by the scalar $\omega (h)$ on $H$ and zero on ${\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$. This respects the Lie bracket, since $[\mathfrak{b},\mathfrak{b}]\subseteq {\mathfrak{n}}^{+}$. The induced Verma moduleis nonzero: the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem identifies its underlying vector space with $U({\mathfrak{n}}^{-})$, and $v=1\otimes 1$ is a primitive element of weight $\omega$. Its weight spaces are finite dimensional, its top weight space is the line $\mathbb{C}v$, and all other weights are $\omega -\sum n_i{\alpha }_i$ with $n_i\ge 0$ and at least one positive coefficient.

A proper submodule cannot contain $v$, because $v$ generates $M(\omega )$. More strongly it has no component of weight $\omega$: any finite sum of distinct weight vectors can be projected onto its individual components by a polynomial in a generic element of $H$. Therefore the sum $N$ of all proper submodules still misses the top weight line and is proper. It contains every proper submodule, so the irreducible quotient of a Verma moduleis irreducible and retains the nonzero primitive element $v+N$. This constructs the requested representation for every $\omega \in H^{\ast }$. It is not asserted to be finite dimensional for arbitrary $\omega$.

For the sl2 Lie algebra, use $h=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0\\ 0& -1\end{array}\right)$, $e=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right)$ and $f=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 0\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$, with $[h,e]=2e$, $[h,f]=-2f$, $[e,f]=h$. The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations gives one irreducible $V_n$ for every integer $n\ge 0$. In a basis $v_0,\dots ,v_n$ its action iswhere $v_{-1}=v_{n+1}=0$. These formulas satisfy the three Lie brackets. Any nonzero invariant subspace contains a weight vector by polynomial projection using $h$; repeated application of $e$ gives $v_0$, and applications of $f$ then give the entire basis. Thus $V_n$ is irreducible.

Conversely, in any finite-dimensional irreducible module, start with an eigenvector of $h$ and apply $e$ until reaching a nonzero vector $v$ with $ev=0$. This process terminates because $e$ increases the eigenvalue by two and only finitely many eigenvalues occur. Write $hv=av$. The sl2 highest-weight lowering formula givesLet $f^{n}v\ne 0$ and $f^{n+1}v=0$, which again follows from the finite set of weights. Applying $e$ to the latter identity yields $(n+1)(a-n)f^{n}v=0$, so $a=n$. The resulting $n+1$ distinct weight vectors span an invariant subspace, hence the entire irreducible module. Therefore $\dim V_n=n+1$ and its primitive weight is ${\omega }_n(h)=n$, with $n=0,1,2,\dots$; its weights are $n,n-2,\dots ,-n$.

Start with the classification of finite-dimensional representations of SU2. Its irreducible complex group representations are the spin-$j$ spacesThe central element $-I$ acts on $V_j$ as $(-1{)}^{2j}$. These facts follow also by realizing $V_j$ as homogeneous polynomials of degree $2j$ in two variables: the raising and lowering operators connect all of their one-dimensional weight spaces, and the highest-weight classification supplies every irreducible.

Identify Euclidean four-space with the quaternions. The unit quaternions, each a copy of $SU(2)$, act byThe norm is multiplicative, so this is an orthogonal action. It preserves orientation because the acting group is connected. If it fixes every $q$, setting $q=1$ first gives $a=b$, and then this quaternion must commute with every quaternion; a real unit quaternion is $\pm 1$. The kernel is therefore $\{(1,1),(-1,-1)\}$.

For completeness, the differential is injective: if imaginary quaternions $u,v$ satisfy $uq-qv=0$ for every $q$, then $u=v$ is central and imaginary, hence zero. Both Lie algebras have dimension six. Thus the image contains a neighbourhood of the identity and is an open subgroup of the connected SO(4) group, so it is the whole group. This proves the Spin(4) double coverThe covering group is simply connected since each $SU(2)$ is a three-sphere.

The irreducible representations of a product of compact groups are tensor products of irreducibles of its two factors. One way to see this is to decompose an irreducible space into isotypic components for the first factor; the second commutes with the first, so only one isotypic component can occur. The multiplicity space must then be irreducible for the second factor. Hence the covering-group irreducibles are $V_{j_L}\otimes V_{j_R}$. By central parity on SU2 tensor products, the kernel element acts as $(-1{)}^{2j_L+2j_R}$. The group representation descends to $SO(4)$ precisely when that sign is positive. The representations of SO(4) from two SU2 spins are thereforeEvery finite-dimensional irreducible complex group representation of $SO(4)$ is obtained this way. Since the group is compact, these are also all its continuous irreducible unitary group representations, up to equivalence.

The Lie-algebra version makes the two spin labels visible locally. Choose rotation generators $J_i$ and generators $K_i$ mixing the fourth direction with the first three, normalized so thatThen $A_i=(J_i+K_i)/2$ and $B_i=(J_i-K_i)/2$ obey two commuting copies of $\mathfrak{su}(2)$. The quaternion quotient determines which Lie algebra representations integrate to the actual group, rather than only to its cover.

For example, $(0,0)$ is the scalar, $(1/2,1/2)$ is the four-vector, and $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ are the three-dimensional self-dual and anti-self-dual two-form group representations. The half-spin spaces $(1/2,0)$ and $(0,1/2)$ belong to the cover and do not descend to $SO(4)$. Restricting to rotations fixing the real quaternion axis gives the diagonal $SU(2)$, and the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 yieldswith steps of one. For a descended group representation these diagonal spins are integers, as required for the spatial $SO(3)$ subgroup.

For a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, write $[A,B]$ for the linear span of brackets with one argument in each indicated subspace. The three definitions areThese are respectively an Abelian Lie algebra, a solvable Lie algebra and a nilpotent Lie algebra. The second and third sequences are the derived series of a Lie algebra and the lower central series of a Lie algebra.

An Abelian Lie algebra has ${\gamma }_2=0$, and a nilpotent Lie algebra is a solvable Lie algebra: induction gives ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(j)}\subseteq {\gamma }_{j+1}$. Thus all the implications are generated byNone of the reverse implications holds. The Heisenberg Lie algebra with basis $x,y,z$ and $[x,y]=z$, all other basic brackets zero, is nonabelian but has ${\gamma }_2=\mathbb{C}z$, ${\gamma }_3=0$. The two-dimensional affine Lie algebra of the line with $[h,e]=e$ has ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(1)}=\mathbb{C}e$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(2)}=0$, but ${\gamma }_j=\mathbb{C}e$ for every $j\ge 2$. It is solvable and neither nilpotent nor abelian. These two examples answer all six ordered-pair comparisons.

The Lie theorem says that a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a finite-dimensional solvable Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero has a common eigenvector whenever its representation space is nonzero. Equivalently it admits an invariant complete flag, or simultaneous upper triangularization. Here the field may be taken to be $\mathbb{C}$; these hypotheses are essential.

To prove the common-eigenvector assertion, induct on $\dim \mathfrak{g}$. The zero algebra is immediate. Since $\mathfrak{g}$ is nonzero and solvable, its derived algebra is proper. Choose a codimension-one Lie algebra ideal $\mathfrak{h}$ containing it, and write $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}\oplus \mathbb{C}x$. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is solvable, so induction supplies $v\ne 0$ and a linear functional $\lambda :\mathfrak{h}\to \mathbb{C}$ with $hv=\lambda (h)v$.

Consider the finite-dimensional cyclic subspace $W=\mathrm{span}\{v,xv,x^{2}v,\dots \}$. Until the first linear dependence, these powers form a basis. The identityand $[h,x]\in \mathfrak{h}$ show by induction, simultaneously for all $h\in \mathfrak{h}$, that $W$ is $\mathfrak{h}$-invariant and that $h$ is upper triangular on it with every diagonal entry $\lambda (h)$. It is also $x$-invariant by construction. HenceThe trace of a commutator is zero, and characteristic zero gives $\lambda ([x,h])=0$.

The simultaneous eigenspace $E_{\lambda }=\{w:hw=\lambda (h)w\text{ for every }h\in \mathfrak{h}\}$ is nonzero and $x$-invariant, sinceOver an algebraically closed field, $x{|}_{E_{\lambda }}$ has an eigenvector, which is therefore a common eigenvector for all of $\mathfrak{g}$. This finishes induction. Apply the same assertion to the quotient representation by its invariant line, and then to successive quotients. A basis adapted to the resulting complete flag gives the stated simultaneous triangularization of a Lie algebra representation, completing the proof of the Lie theorem.

A nilpotent Lie algebra is a solvable Lie algebra, so the inclusion $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ satisfies the Lie theorem and is upper triangular in a suitable basis, for finite-dimensional complex $V$.

This is insufficient to prove the Engel theorem. Its matrix version starts with a Lie subalgebra of nilpotent endomorphisms and concludes that they are simultaneously strictly upper triangular; its abstract version concludes nilpotence from nilpotence of every Adjoint representation endomorphism. Merely upper triangular matrices can have nonzero diagonal entries: the one-dimensional algebra $\mathbb{C}{I}_V$ is an Abelian Lie algebra and a nilpotent Lie algebra, but acts by a nonnilpotent identity matrix. This is nilpotent Lie algebras need not act nilpotently. Moreover, in the abstract Engel theorem nilpotence of the algebra is a conclusion, so assuming it first to invoke the Lie theorem would be circular. Abstract nilpotence and nilpotence of each representing matrix are different conditions.

The Weyl complete reducibility theorem states that every finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra is a direct sum of Irreducible Lie algebra representations. Equivalently, every invariant vector subspace has an invariant complement.

We use the permitted Casimir operator properties in the following precise form. There is a central quadratic operator $C$ commuting with the action on every module; it is zero on the trivial Lie algebra representation, and on every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it is a nonzero scalar $c$. This follows from the Schur lemma and the Casimir eigenvalue $c_{\lambda }=(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, using the Killing form normalization. We also use the permitted one-dimensional-representation fact: a complex semisimple Lie algebra has only trivial one-dimensional representations. Equivalently, it is a perfect Lie algebra, $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}$, so a character $\mathfrak{g}\to \mathbb{C}$ annihilating brackets must vanish. Neither fact assumes complete reducibility of the module being proved reducible.

First prove that every finite-dimensional short exact sequencewith trivial quotient splits. If $W$ is nontrivial irreducible, the Casimir operator $C_E$ has image in $W$ and restricts to $c{I}_W$ there. Consequently $\ker C_E$ is a one-dimensional invariant complement to $W$. If $W$ is trivial irreducible, $E$ has a basis in which every action is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& a(x)\\ 0& 0\end{array}\right)$. The Lie algebra representation identity makes $a([x,y])=0$, so the one-dimensional-representation fact gives $a=0$ and again the sequence splits.

For general $W$, induct on $\dim W$. Choose an irreducible submodule $W_1\subseteq W$. The induced sequence with kernel $W/W_1$ and middle term $E/W_1$ splits by induction. The inverse image $E_1\subseteq E$ of its invariant complement is a submodule fitting into $0\to W_1\to E_1\to \mathbb{C}\to 0$. The irreducible-kernel case gives an invariant line in $E_1$ mapping isomorphically to the quotient. It is also an invariant complement to $W$ in $E$. The case $W=0$ starts this induction. This proves splitting of a trivial quotient for a semisimple Lie algebra, including kernels that are not assumed completely reducible.

Now let $U\subseteq V$ be any invariant subspace. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,U)$ the action isLet $E$ consist of the maps whose restriction to $U$ is a scalar multiple of $I_U$. This is a submodule, and restriction givesThe right-hand map is surjective because an ordinary linear projection $V\to U$ exists; its quotient action is trivial because a commutator with $I_U$ is zero. The splitting just proved supplies an invariant $T\in E$ with $T{|}_U=I_U$. Thus $T$ intertwines the actions, $T^2=T$, andThe cases $U=0$ and $U=V$ are immediate. Choosing an irreducible submodule and repeating this complement construction proves the Weyl complete reducibility theorem. This last step is invariant complement from an equivariant projection.

Dropping finite dimensionality gives an example with the complex simple Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Its Verma module of highest weight zero has a basis $v_0,v_1,\dots$ withwhere $e{v}_0=0$. These actions obey $[h,e]=2e$, $[h,f]=-2f$, $[e,f]=h$. The span of $v_1,v_2,\dots$ is a proper submodule and the quotient is trivial. It has no invariant complement: such a complement would be a trivial line, while $f$ is injective on the entire module. Thus a simple Lie algebra can have an infinite-dimensional representation that is not completely reducible, even over $\mathbb{C}$.

Let $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation. The form denoted $B_V$ isIt is the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation; the Killing form $B$ without a subscript is specifically the case $V=\mathfrak{g}$, $\rho =\mathrm{ad}$. The distinction matters: the form of the trivial representation cannot detect whether the algebra is semisimple.

Linearity of $\rho$ and trace proves bilinearity, and cyclicity of the trace gives symmetry. With $A=\rho (X)$, $D=\rho (Y)$ and $C=\rho (Z)$, the representation identity givesThus it is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, and in particular the Adjoint representation preserves the Killing form.

The Cartan solvability criterion has two useful formulations. For a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$,Its matrix version says that a Lie subalgebra $L\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ is solvable precisely when $\mathrm{tr}(xy)=0$ for all $x\in [L,L]$ and $y\in L$. We prove the matrix version first, with ordinary trace in $V$.

If $L$ is solvable, the Lie theorem makes all its matrices upper triangular. Their commutators are strictly upper triangular, so multiplying such a matrix by an upper triangular one still has zero diagonal and hence zero trace. This proves the easy direction.

Conversely assume the trace-orthogonality condition and fix $x\in [L,L]$. We show that all eigenvalues of $x$ vanish. Use its Additive Jordan decomposition $x=x_s+x_n$ with $[x_s,x_n]=0$. On the generalized eigenspace $V_{\lambda }$ of $x$, define an auxiliary endomorphism $y$ to be $\overline{\lambda }I$. This $y$ need not be in $L$; we only need control of its commutator with $L$.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ acts by $\lambda -\mu$ and $\mathrm{ad}y$ by $\overline{\lambda }-\overline{\mu }$. Choose a polynomial $q$ with $q(0)=0$ and $q(\lambda -\mu )=\overline{\lambda -\mu }$ at the finitely many distinct differences. Polynomial interpolation supplies it because equal differences have equal conjugates. Therefore $\mathrm{ad}y=q(\mathrm{ad}{x}_s)$.

The adjoint compatibility of additive Jordan decomposition identifies $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ as the semisimple part of $\mathrm{ad}x$. Elementary Jordan–Chevalley decomposition gives $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s=p(\mathrm{ad}x)$ for a polynomial $p$ with $p(0)=0$. Hence $\mathrm{ad}y$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{ad}x$ with zero constant term. Since $\mathrm{ad}x$ maps $L$ into $[L,L]$ and preserves that Lie algebra ideal, we obtainNo assumption that $x_s$, $x_n$ or $y$ belongs to $L$ was made.

Write $x={\sum }_i[a_i,b_i]$ with $a_i,b_i\in L$. Cyclicity and the assumed orthogonality now giveOn the other hand the nilpotent parts have zero trace on each generalized eigenspace, soThus all $\lambda$ are zero and $x$ is a nilpotent endomorphism. This is the Conjugate-spectrum proof of Cartan solvability.

The permitted Engel theorem, in the form needed here, states: a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra of endomorphisms in which every element is nilpotent has a nonzero vector annihilated by all its elements, and iteration on quotients makes every element simultaneously strictly upper triangular. Apply it to $[L,L]$. The strictly upper triangular algebra is nilpotent, so $[L,L]$ is a nilpotent Lie algebra and therefore solvable. Since $L/[L,L]$ is abelian, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $L$ terminates too. This proves the matrix criterion.

Apply it to $L=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. The condition on $B$ is exactly the matrix condition on $L$. Thus $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable. The kernel of $\mathrm{ad}$ is the center of a Lie algebra, which is abelian, so $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable as well: once the derived series maps to zero it is central, and its next term vanishes. Conversely a solvable $\mathfrak{g}$ has solvable adjoint image, proving the abstract Cartan solvability criterion in both directions.

A finite-dimensional Lie algebra is a semisimple Lie algebra when it has no nonzero solvable Lie algebra ideal, equivalently its solvable radical is zero. Let $R=\mathrm{rad}B=\{x:B(x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$. Invariance makes $R$ an ideal. For $x,y\in R$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ induces zero on $\mathfrak{g}/R$, and the block trace gives $B_R(x,y)=B_{\mathfrak{g}}(x,y)=0$, where $B_R$ is the adjoint Killing form of $R$ itself. The Cartan solvability criterion therefore makes $R$ solvable. If $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, $R=0$.

Conversely suppose $B$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form. If a nonzero solvable ideal existed, its last nonzero derived term $A$ would be an abelian ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. For $a\in A$ and $x\in \mathfrak{g}$, the operator $\mathrm{ad}a\mathrm{ad}x$ has image in $A$ and is zero on $A$, so its square and its trace are zero. Thus $B(A,\mathfrak{g})=0$, contradicting nondegeneracy. This is Abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form. We conclude the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity:

Over the complex numbers, every finite-dimensional representation of a solvable Lie algebra has a basis in which every representing matrix is upper triangular. The Lie theorem is often stated first as the existence of a common eigenvector in every nonzero finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of a solvable Lie algebra. Applying that assertion successively to quotient representations gives an invariant complete flag, and hence the upper triangular form. The same proof works over any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.

We prove the common eigenvector assertion by induction on $\dim \mathfrak{g}$, writing the action as $av$. The zero Lie algebra is immediate. If $\mathfrak{g}\ne 0$ is solvable, its derived series of a Lie algebra shows that $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\ne \mathfrak{g}$. Choose a codimension-one ideal of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$ containing $[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and choose $x\notin \mathfrak{a}$. By induction there are $v\ne 0$ and a linear functional $\lambda :\mathfrak{a}\to \mathbb{C}$ such that $av=\lambda (a)v$ for all $a\in \mathfrak{a}$.

Let $W$ be the span of $v,xv,x^{2}v,\dots$. If $m=\dim W$, the first $m$ of these vectors form a basis, and $W$ is $x$-invariant. We claim that for each $a\in \mathfrak{a}$,For $j=0$ this is the definition of $v$. For the induction step, use $ax=xa+[a,x]$ and $[a,x]\in \mathfrak{a}$. Applying the induction hypothesis to both $a$ and $[a,x]$ proves the claim. Consequently $W$ is $\mathfrak{a}$-invariant, and every $a\in \mathfrak{a}$ acts on $W$ by an upper triangular matrix with all diagonal entries $\lambda (a)$.

Since both $x$ and $a$ preserve $W$, the matrix trace of their commutator on $W$ is zero. The claim applied to $[x,a]\in \mathfrak{a}$ givesHere characteristic zero is essential: $m\ne 0$ in the field, so $\lambda ([x,a])=0$. Now the common weight spaceis nonzero and $x$-invariant. Indeed, for $w\in E_{\lambda }$,An endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space has an eigenvector, so choose an eigenvector of $x$ in $E_{\lambda }$. It is a common eigenvector for $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{a}+\mathbb{C}x$. This proves the Lie theorem.

For the printed matrices in characteristic $p$, $[x,y]=x$, and there is no common eigenvector. Index the standard basis by $e_0,\dots ,e_{p-1}$. The cyclic entry in the PDF givesThe $p$ diagonal eigenvalues of $y$ are distinct in $k$. Thus every eigenvector of $y$ is a scalar multiple of a single $e_j$. Since $p\ge 2$, $x{e}_j$ is never a scalar multiple of $e_j$, proving the assertion even when $k$ is not an algebraically closed field.

For $1\le j\le p-1$,At the cyclic boundary,Hence $[x,y]=x$. The two-dimensional Lie subalgebra $kx+ky$ has derived algebra $kx$, whose own derived algebra is zero, so it is solvable. It nevertheless has no common eigenvector, including after extending $k$ to its algebraic closure. This is a failure of Lie theorem in positive characteristic. In the proof above, the obstruction is precisely that $\dim W=p$ can vanish as a scalar in $k$.

The derived algebra of a complex solvable Lie algebra is nilpotent. First suppose $\mathfrak{g}\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$. By the Lie theorem, put every element of $\mathfrak{g}$ in upper triangular form. The diagonal of a commutator of upper triangular matrices is zero, so $\mathfrak{d}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ consists of strictly upper triangular matrices. The Lie algebra of all such matrices is a nilpotent Lie algebra: if $F_r$ consists of matrices whose entries vanish whenever $j-i<r$, thenTherefore the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ reaches zero. Alternatively, every element of $\mathfrak{d}$ is a nilpotent linear map, and the Engel theorem states that a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra consisting of nilpotent linear maps is a nilpotent Lie algebra.

For an abstract complex solvable Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, apply the preceding result to its Adjoint representation. The Lie algebra $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{d}=[\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g},\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}]$ is nilpotent. Since $\ker (\mathrm{ad}{|}_{\mathfrak{d}})=\mathfrak{d}\cap Z(\mathfrak{g})$ is central in $\mathfrak{d}$, some term of the lower central series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$ lies in that central ideal; the next term is zero. Thus $\mathfrak{d}$ itself is nilpotent.

Conversely, every nilpotent Lie algebra is solvable, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is contained term by term in its lower central series of a Lie algebra. If $\mathfrak{d}$ is nilpotent, it is therefore solvable, and $\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{d}$ is Abelian. More directly, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, after its first term, is the derived series of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{d}$. Consequently the derived algebra nilpotence criterion is

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.