The equation is not separable, because cannot be written as a product of a function of and a function of on an open region. For example, the ratio depends on for distinct fixed , whereas a separated product would give a constant ratio.
It is not homogeneous in the sense of a homogeneous first-order differential equation: the right-hand side is not a function of alone. It is also not a homogeneous linear differential equation, since moving the term to the left leaves a nonzero forcing.
It is linear, since it has the standard linear ordinary differential equation form
Thus the classifications are (a) no, (b) no, (c) yes.
Write a second-order linear ordinary differential equation in monic form . At a finite point , an ordinary point has analytic . A singular point is a regular singular point if and extend analytically there. A singular point failing this condition is an irregular singular point. The point at infinity is classified by the reciprocal coordinate .
For the Laguerre differential equation, and . Thus and are analytic at zero, while itself is singular: zero is regular singular. Put . Since and , the transformed equation is
Here is not analytic at zero, so infinity is an irregular singular point, for every real .
For the Frobenius solution, the lowest power has coefficient . Hence the indicial equation is , and equating the remaining powers gives
With the repeated root , the Frobenius series for the Laguerre differential equation obeys
If the series does not terminate, its consecutive term ratio is asymptotic to , so the ratio test gives infinite radius of convergence. It is an entire function, even though the differential equation has a singular coefficient at zero. The repeated indicial root yields only one analytic Frobenius branch; an independent solution generally has a logarithmic term there.
For , the factor stops the recurrence at degree . With its coefficients are , giving the Laguerre polynomials
The same termination argument includes , as required for despite the earlier reference to positive integers.
A causal Green function vanishes before the impulse. For it solves the homogeneous linear ordinary differential equation, whose characteristic roots are . Thus it has the form
Continuity at is necessary to avoid a delta derivative in , so . Integrating its forced equation across the impulse gives the jump condition for an impulse, . The derivative from below is zero and the derivative from above is , giving
Here is the Heaviside step function. The zero initial data exclude any additional homogeneous response. By the superposition principle, the output for a general locally integrable input is
The upper endpoint causes no unwanted term in the first derivative because ; in the second derivative its unit derivative jump reproduces the input.
The Fourier transform of a derivative is times the transform under the stated convention. Transforming the linear ordinary differential equation gives
The applied force is , with the Heaviside step function, so . Partial fractions give
Using the transform pair yields
Its value and first derivative both vanish at , so the joining introduces no spurious Dirac delta terms. Equivalently, this is the convolution of the force with the causal impulse response .
Write . A constant-coefficient linear ordinary differential equation has transfer function , where . The specified simple poles correspond to . A minimal-order choice is therefore
Thus one possible system is
up to a common nonzero multiplicative constant. The root permits an exponentially growing homogeneous solution; the pole data therefore describe an unstable system. This does not prevent the requested algebraic reconstruction of its transfer function.
Take downward distance and downward speed , with constant gravitational acceleration and quadratic drag coefficient . The printed vector square has no standard vector meaning; the directionally consistent drag force is . For this downward fall, Newton's second law becomes
The terminal velocity is obtained by setting the net force to zero:
From rest, the speed increases monotonically towards this limiting value. In fact ; thus it is a supremum approached at infinite time, and a tower of finite height need not permit it to be reached.
For the required distance, use the chain rule . Writing gives a linear ordinary differential equation:
Consequently,
Here has units of inverse length, so the result has the required units of distance and is independent of the falling mass.
Equilibrium and undamped motion. Resolve forces along the incline, taking positive displacement down the slope. At equilibrium, Hooke's law balances the downhill component of weight:
If is measured from that equilibrium position, Newton's second law becomes
Thus the motion is a harmonic oscillator with
Gravity shifts the equilibrium extension but drops out of this oscillation frequency because the downhill force component is constant.
Viscous damping. For a damped harmonic oscillator, put . Substitution of in the supplied linear ordinary differential equation gives
In the underdamped regime , define . The two characteristic roots are , and the general real displacement is
Here , or equivalently and , are fixed by the initial conditions. For release from rest at , the condition requires , not :
The curve oscillates about zero between exponentially shrinking envelopes , where for this release. The upper panel illustrates that shape; its damping strength is chosen to make the envelope visible.
Figure 1.
An underdamped release and the first encounter with the stop for the given parameters
. Details.
Frequency change. Viscous damping reduces the angular frequency and lengthens the oscillation period:
For light damping, , so the frequency shift is second order in , even though the envelope decay rate is first order in .
Will the block reach the stop? The given parameters give
For , differentiating the release-from-rest solution gives
It is positive throughout the first half-cycle. The first positive turning point therefore occurs at . The turning points of an underdamped release from rest give its unobstructed height:
Since and the displacement increases continuously up to that point,
Solving gives first contact at approximately . The plotted dashed continuation is the hypothetical free motion after that time; the post-impact motion is not determined by the supplied damping model.
Set . The proposed velocity and its derivative are
The remaining term in the linear ordinary differential equation is
so the sum is exactly . Also , establishing both the equation and its initial condition:
The integrating factor explains where the expression comes from:
The result has units of velocity. Its continuous limit is , despite the apparent in the written expression.
For electric potential difference and electric current varying as sinusoids, choose the phasor convention
The electrical impedance is
Its modulus gives the voltage-to-current amplitude ratio, and its complex argument gives the voltage-minus-current phase difference. For ideal components,
These follow from Ohm's law , the capacitor law , and the inductor law . In phasor notation a time derivative becomes multiplication by , turning the linear ordinary differential equations of the electrical circuit into algebraic equations. Electrical impedances add in a series circuit; their reciprocals, the electrical admittances, add in a parallel circuit. This computes both amplitudes and phase differences in the steady response to sinusoids.
In Newtonian gravity, the radial equation with conserved specific angular momentum is . The substitution therefore gives the linear differential equation
Choosing along perihelion, its elliptic orbit solution is
Here is the semilatus rectum. One can check the last equality directly from , , and .
To find Schwarzschild perihelion precession, write in the relativistic equation and retain first order in . The linear ordinary differential equation for the correction is
The constant and double-frequency forcing change the orbit's shape without accumulating an angular shift. The resonant term produces
since . The oscillating part of the perturbed orbit is consequently the first-order expansion of
Successive perihelia are separated by , slightly more than a full revolution. Their forward angular advance is thus
in radians per orbit. This leading expression applies when . For a perfectly circular orbit there is no uniquely located perihelion; the same expression describes the limiting mismatch of radial and azimuthal frequencies for a small nonzero orbital eccentricity.
By definition, the relaxation modulus is the stress generated by a unit step of strain from an initially relaxed state. Set , where is the Heaviside step function, and write . Integrating the linear ordinary differential equation across the step shows that neither nor can jump: a jump would produce a Dirac delta function or its derivative, absent from the forcing. Hence .
For , a particular solution is . The characteristic equation factors as
so . The initial conditions give and , whence
The time and modulus units are those implicit in the printed coefficients. A Laplace transform check gives .
The original PDF really does put undifferentiated strain on the right-hand side. The resulting response rises from zero to one, with , rather than exhibiting ordinary stress relaxation. There is a stronger physical problem if this is intended as a passive material law: with the convention the stress-to-strain amplitude ratio is
The loss modulus would give negative cycle-averaged supplied power , contrary to passivity in linear viscoelasticity. The boxed expression is therefore the formal relaxation modulus of the equation as printed, not a claim that this equation describes an ordinary passive viscoelasticity model. No derivative of the input has been silently inserted.
At a fixed input the production terms are constant, so both linear ordinary differential equations can also be solved exactly:
Each displacement from its equilibrium concentration decays with time constant one. The Jacobian matrix is , with two eigenvalues equal to , so the fixed point is globally asymptotically stable for the nonnegative state space.
Here is a numerical solver using the classical fourth-order Runge-Kutta method; it uses only the repository's existing NumPy and matplotlib dependencies. Continue the definitions from part (b):
def integrate(rhs, initial, times):
    out = np.empty((len(times), len(initial)))
    out[0] = initial
    for j, dt in enumerate(np.diff(times)):
        state = out[j]
        k1 = rhs(state)
        k2 = rhs(state + dt*k1/2)
        k3 = rhs(state + dt*k2/2)
        k4 = rhs(state + dt*k3)
        out[j+1] = state + dt*(k1 + 2*k2 + 2*k3 + k4)/6
    return out

def direct_rhs(state, X):
    Y, Z = state
    return np.array([2*hill(X, 1, 2) - Y,
                     3*hill(X, 2, 4) - Z])

times = np.linspace(0, 8, 801)
plt.figure(figsize=(7, 4))
for initial, style in [([0, 0], "-"), ([3, 4], "--")]:
    trajectory = integrate(lambda s: direct_rhs(s, 2), initial, times)
    exact = np.array([1.6, 1.5]) + (np.array(initial) - [1.6, 1.5]) \
            * np.exp(-times[:, None])
    assert np.max(np.abs(trajectory - exact)) < 1e-8
    plt.plot(times, trajectory[:, 0], style, label=f"Y, initial {initial}")
    plt.plot(times, trajectory[:, 1], style, label=f"Z, initial {initial}")
plt.xlabel("Time")
plt.ylabel("Concentration")
plt.legend()
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
For , . The initial state approaches those values from below, while approaches from above. Over eight time units the initial displacement is reduced by , explaining why both trajectories nearly coincide with the equilibria from part (b). The two-panel figure above displays these simulations.
Set . The boundary value problem becomes
For , direct substitution gives . This growing polynomial solution is useful for reduction of order.
Write . Substitution into the linear ordinary differential equation cancels the terms proportional to and gives
An integrating factor for this first-order equation for yields
The far-field boundary condition selects the convergent integral from :
Any additional multiple of would grow at . The chosen expression tends to zero: for ,
Here and . Thus the far-field boundary condition is verified without a cancellation of large terms.
At , differentiating gives , so . Using the antiderivative supplied in the paper gives the explicit answer
Here is the error function. Finally,
recovers the unique correction satisfying . The decay bound also shows that approaches a finite constant at , as allowed by the normal velocity matching. This is the weak surface-shear perturbation of stagnation flow.
If the printed condition is instead imposed literally on a positive half-line, reduction of order gives
It satisfies but grows as , so it cannot describe the fluid domain specified in this paper. This makes the consequence of the printed sign error explicit.
Multiplying the ordinary differential equation by two suggests using the dependent variable , whose derivative is . On the interval through , this gives the linear ordinary differential equation
After integration, . The initial condition gives . As , continuity selects the positive branch:
The interval is the maximal real interval through the given initial condition: at the formula approaches , but its derivative is unbounded, so it does not extend through zero as a differentiable solution of a differential equation.
The homogeneous linear differential equation has solutions and . Since the forcing is already a homogeneous solution, seek a particular solution proportional to . Direct differentiation gives
Thus the general solution of the linear ordinary differential equation is
The first initial condition gives . Also
so the second initial condition gives , hence . Therefore
Divide by , which is allowed because :
The integrating factor for this linear ordinary differential equation is . Multiplying through makes the left side a product rule derivative:
Part (b) now gives . Therefore
For the homogeneous linear ordinary differential equation, the characteristic equation is
Its real solution is . For a particular solution to the full ordinary differential equation, try . Substitution gives
so and . Adding the homogeneous and particular solutions yields
The two arbitrary real constants account for the second order of the ordinary differential equation.
The linear ordinary differential equation has differential operator . Put and use the product rule twice:
Substitution cancels the and terms, leaving . Two integrations give . Hence the general solution is
The two arbitrary constants account for the order of the differential equation; the factor in the particular term reflects the repeated root of the characteristic polynomial.
For , write the linear ordinary differential equation as
An integrating factor on each interval avoiding is ; multiplication by a nonzero constant, including a sign, is immaterial. Therefore
The partial fraction decomposition is
Integrating gives the general solution
The constant is independent on each connected interval of definition. At the singular points the undivided differential equation forces and . The displayed family tends to these values, but its derivative has a logarithmic divergence there, so no member extends as a differentiable function through either singular point.