Past exam of the physics B course of the University of Cambridge / 2022 / Paper 2 / Section B

Newton's second law takes its familiar form $m\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{F}$ in an inertial frame. Axes fixed to a turning apparatus or to the Earth form a rotating reference frame. Extra inertial forces account for the acceleration of these coordinates. Their values depend on the chosen reference frame; physical interactions such as gravity, tension and contact forces must still be included separately.

Let the rotating origin have inertial acceleration $\mathbf{A}$, and let its axes have angular velocity $\mathbf{\Omega }(t)$. For any vector $\mathbf{q}$, the rotating-frame derivative formula isEach rotating basis vector changes by $\mathbf{\Omega }\times {\mathbf{e}}_i$, which proves this rule by expanding $\mathbf{q}$ in that basis. Apply it twice to the position relative to the moving origin. With ${\mathbf{v}}^{\prime }$ and ${\mathbf{a}}^{\prime }$ measured in the rotating axes,Consequently the equation in the rotating reference frame isThe additional terms are the translational inertial force, Coriolis force, Euler force and centrifugal force, respectively. The last two simplify when the angular velocity is constant: the Euler force vanishes, while the other rotation terms remain.

The centrifugal force points away from the rotation axis. If ${\mathbf{r}}_{\perp }$ is the perpendicular displacement from that axis, thenFor uniform rotation it has potential energyA mass at rest relative to a turntable can therefore be described as having an inward tension or friction balancing its outward centrifugal force. In an inertial frame, the inward physical force instead produces the required centripetal acceleration. These are two descriptions of the same motion; one must not insert the rotating-frame outward term into the inertial equation as an additional physical interaction.

A rotating liquid gives a useful quantitative example. For a liquid in hydrostatic equilibrium relative to a vessel rotating uniformly about the vertical axis,Along the free surface the pressure is constant, so ${\Omega }^{2}sds-gdz=0$ andThe surface is a elliptic paraboloid. This is the balance of gravity and the centrifugal force in the rotating description. On the Earth, the same outward acceleration reduces effective gravity, most strongly at the equator, and contributes to the planet's equatorial bulge.

The Coriolis force depends on relative motion:It is perpendicular to both $\mathbf{\Omega }$ and ${\mathbf{v}}^{\prime }$, vanishes for motion along the rotation axis, and reverses when the relative velocity reverses. The dot product givesThus the Coriolis force does no work in the rotating reference frame: it changes the direction of motion rather than directly changing the rotating-frame kinetic energy. For example, on a horizontal turntable rotating anticlockwise as viewed from above, an outward-moving slider has a clockwise Coriolis acceleration, whereas an inward-moving slider has an anticlockwise one. The deflection can be observed by comparing a laboratory camera with a camera rotating with the table.

For slow horizontal motion on the Earth at latitude $\lambda$, keep the vertical component ${\Omega }_E\sin \lambda$ of its angular velocity. In east-north coordinates $(u,v)$ the horizontal Coriolis acceleration isIt deflects motion to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere. In large-scale atmospheric and oceanic motion it can balance a horizontal pressure gradient, giving geostrophic balance. With $\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ upward, the steady horizontal equation without friction isThe resulting velocity runs along lines of equal pressure. This approximation requires rotation to dominate local inertial changes; it is inappropriate close to the equator where $f$ tends to zero.

The Foucault pendulum gives another terrestrial example. In the small-angle approximation, its horizontal coordinates satisfyTo first order in the small ratio ${\Omega }_E/{\omega }_0$, the oscillation plane precesses relative to the ground at angular rate $-{\Omega }_E\sin \lambda$: clockwise in the northern hemisphere, zero at the equator, and one revolution per sidereal day at a pole. The Coriolis force explains this changing orientation without requiring energy input. Together these examples show why inertial forces are useful whenever the apparatus or environment supplies naturally rotating coordinates.

The examination asks for three notes. All four options are worked below so that each topic has a complete study answer.

The method of images solves certain electrostatics problems by replacing a conductor by fictitious electric charges outside the region where the solution is required. The replacement must satisfy the actual boundary values of the electric potential as well as the prescribed sources. The uniqueness of Poisson equation then establishes that the constructed electric potential equals the physical one in that region. The image locations are mathematical devices; they are not real charges inside the metal.

For a point charge $q$ at $(0,0,a)$ above an infinite grounded conducting plane $z=0$, put an image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-a)$. In a cylindrical coordinate system with coordinates $(s,z)$ the potential in the physical region isThis vanishes at $z=0$, has the required singularity at the real charge, and tends to zero at infinity. With electric field $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$, the induced surface charge density follows from the normal field immediately above the conductor:The force on $q$ is the field of the image evaluated at the real charge:The electrostatic energy relative to infinite separation is $U=\frac{1}{2}q{\varphi }_{\mathrm{image}}=-q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$. The factor $1/2$ accounts for the fact that the induced charge changes as the real charge is assembled; treating the image as an independently fixed physical charge would give the wrong energy.

A second standard geometry is a grounded conducting sphere of radius $b$ with a charge $q$ a distance $d>b$ from its centre. Its exterior field is generated by an image $q^{\prime }=-qb/d$ at distance $b^2/d$ from the centre on the line towards the real charge. On the sphere the distances to the real and image charges are in the ratio $d/b$, making their potentials cancel. For an isolated neutral sphere, an additional central image $+qb/d$ makes the total induced charge zero and leaves the surface an equipotential. The construction is powerful for suitable symmetric boundaries, but arbitrary boundaries do not in general admit a finite image system.

An electrical insulator has no freely conducting bulk charge in the ideal static description, but an applied electric field can displace bound positive and negative charge relative to one another. The resulting electric dipole moments per unit volume define the polarization density $\mathbf{P}$. Distortion of electronic charge clouds, relative displacement of ions, and partial alignment of permanent molecular electric dipoles can all contribute. Thermal agitation opposes the last mechanism.

For a weak field in a linear isotropic dielectric, the constitutive law isHere ${\chi }_e$ is the electric susceptibility, $ϵ$ is the permittivity, and $\mathbf{D}$ is the electric displacement field. In an anisotropic material, ${\chi }_e$ is a tensor and $\mathbf{P}$ need not be parallel to $\mathbf{E}$. These response laws describe the macroscopic field, not necessarily the microscopic field acting on one molecule.

Spatial variation and surface termination of the polarization density give bound charge and bound current through the bound charge densitieswhere $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ is outward from the material. Thus uniform polarization density has no bulk bound charge, but generally has opposite bound charges on opposing surfaces. Gauss's law can be rewritten asWith no free surface charge, the normal component of $\mathbf{D}$ is continuous across an interface; the tangential electric field is continuous in electrostatics.

For example, fill a parallel-plate capacitor of plate area $A$ and gap $d$ with a uniform dielectric, neglecting fringing. At fixed free plate charge $Q$, $D=Q/A$, soThe induced bound surface charges oppose the original field, reducing the electric field and potential difference at fixed $Q$. At fixed applied potential difference, the field remains $V/d$ and the battery instead supplies more free charge. The electric displacement field separates these free-charge and bound-charge roles.

Because the magnetic field obeys $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$, it can be represented locally as the curl of a magnetic vector potential:This automatically enforces the absence of magnetic monopoles. It is also a global representation throughout ordinary all-space problems without monopole singularities. It is not unique: the gauge transformationleaves $\mathbf{B}$ unchanged because the curl of a gradient vanishes. In a time-dependent problem,makes the same transformation leave both physical fields unchanged and automatically satisfies Faraday's law.

In vacuum magnetostatics, choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Substitution into Ampère's law and the identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{A})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{A}$ givesfor a localized steady electric current density and a potential vanishing at infinity. Taking the curl recovers the Biot-Savart law. The magnetic vector potential converts a constrained vector field problem into componentwise Poisson equations once a gauge is chosen.

For a uniform magnetic field, $\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}$ is a convenient choice. For a localized magnetic dipole moment $\mathbf{m}$, the leading far-field potential isAnother useful relation is Stokes theorem, which relates a closed-path integral to the magnetic flux through a spanning surface:The units of $\mathbf{A}$ are $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{m}$, equivalently $\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.

An incident electromagnetic wave generally produces reflected and transmitted waves because the two media have different electromagnetic response. Consider a flat interface between homogeneous, linear, lossless media with permittivities ${ϵ}_j$ and magnetic permeabilities ${\mu }_j$. Their wave speeds and wave impedances areFor each plane electromagnetic wave, $\mathbf{H}=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\times \mathbf{E}/Z_j$. With no free surface charge or current, the interface conditions for electromagnetic fields require continuous tangential $\mathbf{E},\mathbf{H}$ and normal $\mathbf{D},\mathbf{B}$. Equality of the phase at every point on the boundary gives equal angular frequencies and tangential wavevectors. Hence the reflection angle equals the incidence angle and Snell's law iswhere $n_j=c/v_j$ and each angle is measured from the normal.

At normal incidence use the same tangential axis for all electric amplitudes. The two independent boundary equations areSolving gives the amplitude Fresnel equationsFor nonmagnetic media, these become $r=(n_1-n_2)/(n_1+n_2)$ and $t=2n_1/(n_1+n_2)$. Reflection into a medium of larger refractive index therefore reverses the electric amplitude's sign at normal incidence.

The normal Poynting vector determines the reflected and transmitted fractions of incident power. At normal incidence,It is the power fractions, rather than the squared electric amplitudes alone, that add to unity.

At oblique incidence separate transverse electric polarization ($s$, electric field perpendicular to the incidence plane) from transverse magnetic polarization ($p$, electric field in that plane). For nonmagnetic media, writing $c_i=\cos {\theta }_i$ and $c_t=\cos {\theta }_t$, the Fresnel equations areHere choose a common $s$ direction and, for each ray, the $p$ direction as $\hat{\mathbf{s}}\times \hat{\mathbf{k}}$. This makes the reflected $p$ basis reverse its tangential direction at normal incidence, explaining why the displayed $r_p$ then has the opposite sign to $r_s$. Physical reflectance is independent of this sign convention. For either polarization with propagating transmission,For $p$ polarization, zero reflection occurs at the Brewster angle $\tan {\theta }_B=n_2/n_1$. If $n_1>n_2$, incidence above the critical angle for total internal reflection $\sin {\theta }_c=n_2/n_1$ produces an evanescent field in total internal reflection and $\mathcal{R}=1$ for an isolated lossless interface. A lossy second medium requires complex response coefficients and an absorption term in the energy balance.