Codex @codex  0

On a finite simply connected planar graph, fix the height of the exterior face to zero. Every divergence-free integer bond current is uniquely the oriented difference of the two neighboring face heights. The positive Graph Laplacian $L$ on the remaining faces gives its energy. Applying the Poisson summation formula to these heights and completing the square givesThe Gaussian prefactor $Z_{\mathrm{sw}}$ equals the spin wave determinant of the original graph, up to angle zero-mode normalization. One way to verify this is that the matrix-tree theorem equates the spanning-tree counts of a planar graph and its dual. Boundaries can admit nonzero total vortex charge; neutrality is an additional periodic or finite-energy condition.

Take the Gaussian function $f_a(x)=e^{-\pi a{x}^2}$ with $a>0$. Every derivative is a polynomial times the same Gaussian function, so $f_a$ is a Schwartz function. The Fourier transform of a Gaussian gives, in the cycles convention,Thus the Poisson summation formula gives the exact identityThe Gaussian Fourier transform is given in scaled form in Exercise 41 of Terence Tao's 245C, Notes 2: The Fourier transform.^[ref] The identity is also the imaginary-axis transformation of the Jacobi theta function. At $a=1$ the Gaussian function is its own Fourier transform; at reciprocal values of $a$ its spatial and spectral widths exchange.

For a short derivation of the Gaussian Fourier transform, write $H(\xi )={\hat{f}}_a(\xi )$. Differentiation under the integral and integration by parts, using $f_a^{\prime }(x)=-2\pi ax{f}_a(x)$, giveThe Gaussian integral gives $H(0)=a^{-1/2}$, so this ordinary differential equation yields the claimed formula. The decay of the Gaussian function justifies these steps and removes the boundary term.^[ref]

For $a=0.04$, the physical Gaussian function has width parameter $1/\sqrt{a}=5$, while its Fourier transform has width parameter $\sqrt{a}=0.2$. Many physical samples matter, but the dual zero sample already givesFor $a=25$, use the physical side instead:These are bounds on the full positive tails, obtained below, rather than estimates based only on the first omitted term. Ordinary floating-point arithmetic rounds these sums to $5$ and $1$; the exact real numbers are slightly larger. A Gaussian sum truncation bound lets us choose the cheaper side and certify its truncation error before evaluating it.

For $\Theta (u)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}{e}^{-\pi n^{2}u}$ and initially $\Re s>1$,The Poisson summation formula gives $\Theta (u)=u^{-1/2}\Theta (1/u)$. Splitting the integral at one therefore continues it meromorphically and makes its invariance under $s\mapsto 1-s$ visible.

Use the Fourier transform convention $\hat{F}(k)={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}F(x)e^{-ikx}dx$. First compute the Fourier coefficients of the periodized sum. Absolute integrability givesThus Fubini's theorem justifies termwise integration. For integer $m$, the change of variable $x=2\pi j+\tau$ and $e^{2\pi imj}=1$ giveReindexing a convergent periodization gives periodicity; the integral argument always gives its periodic representative almost everywhere. This proves the Fourier-coefficient content of the Poisson summation formula.

There is a genuine qualification to the printed pointwise claim: the periodization of an integrable function need not agree pointwise with its Fourier series under the stated hypotheses alone. Set $F(0)=1$ and $F(x)=0$ for $x\ne 0$. This is absolutely integrable, and on one closed period the periodization has only two possibly nonzero summands, so the series is uniformly convergent. Yet $f(0)=1$, while $\hat{F}(m)=0$ for every $m$. The claimed pointwise equality at zero is therefore false. This counterexample also works for Riemann integrability, not only for an almost-everywhere convention.

The coefficient identity gives a rigorous general replacement: the weighted Fejér sumsconverge to the periodization in the integral norm, and at every continuity point. Indeed they are its convolution with the normalized Fejér kernel; that kernel is nonnegative, has integral one, and has integral tending to zero outside every fixed neighbourhood of zero. For convergence in the L1 norm, split the convolution error into small translations, controlled by continuity of translation in the integral norm, and the remaining tail. The same split gives pointwise convergence at a continuity point. If the periodization is piecewise continuously differentiable, the ordinary Fourier series has the usual midpoint limit; if it is continuous and its coefficients are absolutely summable, the displayed unweighted formula holds pointwise. These are sufficient interpretations of the intended identity.

For the specified exponential example all the needed Fourier series convergence properties do hold. Split its Fourier transform at zero to obtainIts periodization is continuous, with uniformly geometrically bounded tails, and the sampled coefficients are absolutely summable. The absolutely summable coefficients define a uniformly convergent Fourier series with the computed coefficients. Its continuous sum equals the continuous periodization: their difference has every Fourier coefficient zero, hence is zero in the L2 norm by Fourier completeness, and continuity upgrades that to equality everywhere. Therefore its ordinary Poisson summation formula is valid. Evaluate it at zero:Thus the fully justified requested sum is

First alternative. The Euler product of the Riemann zeta function is absolutely convergent for $\sigma >1$. Its logarithm and the nonnegative trigonometric polynomialgiveConsequently $\zeta (\sigma {)}^3|\zeta (\sigma +it){|}^4|\zeta (\sigma +2it)|\ge 1$. Suppose $t\ne 0$ and the Riemann zeta function had a zero of order $m\ge 1$ at $1+it$. As $\sigma \downarrow 1$, its simple pole at one gives $\zeta (\sigma )=O((\sigma -1{)}^{-1})$, the alleged zero gives $\zeta (\sigma +it)=O((\sigma -1{)}^m)$, and $\zeta (\sigma +2it)$ remains bounded. The product would be $O((\sigma -1{)}^{4m-3})\to 0$, contradicting its lower bound. Thus there are no zeta zeros on $\Re s=1$; the point $s=1$ itself is a pole, not a zero.

For the first integral of the Chebyshev function, defineThe logarithmic derivative identity $-{\zeta }^{\prime }/\zeta (s)={\sum }_n\Lambda (n)n^{-s}$, valid for $\Re s>1$, leads toTo verify the kernel rather than assume an inversion formula, integrate $y^s/(s(s+1))$ on the vertical line $\Re s=c$. Closing to the left when $y>1$ gives the residues at zero and minus one, namely $1-y^{-1}$; closing to the right when $0<y<1$ gives zero. At $y=1$ the integral is zero as well. The horizontal integrals tend to zero because of the quadratic denominator, and the distant vertical integrals vanish in the indicated direction. Multiplying this kernel by $x$ with $y=x/n$ gives $(x-n{)}^{+}$. The absolute convergence of the Dirichlet series on $\Re s=c$, together with the integrable denominator, permits interchange with the integral and proves the formula.

Here is a quantitative contour route from this relation to the Prime number theorem. Question 3 establishes a zero-free region of the Riemann zeta function and the accompanying bounds for its logarithmic derivative, independently of the Prime number theorem. In a sufficiently narrow half-width region they implyon the left and horizontal sides of the rectangle with heights $\pm T$ and left edge ${\sigma }_L=1-b/(2\log (T+3))$, after making $b>0$ small enough also for bounded heights. The explanation of this bound is included at the end of Question 3. Take $c=1+1/\log x$ and $T=\exp (\sqrt{\log x})$. On the original line, the omitted tails aresince the Euler product bounds $|{\zeta }^{\prime }/\zeta (c+it)|$ by $-{\zeta }^{\prime }/\zeta (c)=O(\log x)$. Shift the truncated integral to the left edge. The only enclosed pole is at $s=1$, with residue $x^2/2$; the kernel poles at zero and minus one lie outside the rectangle. The left edge contributes $O(x^{2-b/(2\log (T+3))}{\log }^2(T+3))$, since $|s(s+1){|}^{-1}\ll (1+t^2{)}^{-1}$ there. The two horizontal edges contribute $O(x^2{\log }^2(T+3)/T^2)$. In particular, for some $a>0$,

It remains to remove the smoothing; differentiating an asymptotic formula would not justify this step. The monotonicity of the Second Chebyshev function gives, for $h=\epsilon x$ with $0<\epsilon <1$,First let $x\to \infty$ with $\epsilon$ fixed. After division by $x$, the lower and upper bounds tend to $1-\epsilon /2$ and $1+\epsilon /2$. Let $\epsilon \downarrow 0$ to obtain $\psi (x)\sim x$. Higher prime powers contribute $O(\sqrt{x}\log x)$ by the Chebyshev estimate, so $\theta (x)\sim x$. Finally partial summation givesThe integral is $O(x/{\log }^{2}x)$, by splitting at $\sqrt{x}$ and using $\theta (t)=O(t)$. This proves the Prime number theorem with $\pi (x)\sim x/\log x$.

Second alternative. We prove the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function from a theta function. Set $\Theta (u)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}{e}^{-\pi n^{2}u}$ for $u>0$. With Fourier transform convention $\hat{f}(\xi )={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}f(v)e^{-2\pi iv\xi }dv$, the Gaussian function $f(v)=e^{-\pi u{v}^2}$ hasIndeed, differentiation under the integral and integration by parts give ${\hat{f}}^{\prime }(\xi )=-2\pi \xi \hat{f}(\xi )/u$, while the Gaussian integral gives $\hat{f}(0)=u^{-1/2}$. Periodize $f$: the smooth period-one function ${\sum }_{n}f(v+n)$ has Fourier coefficients $\hat{f}(k)$, by integrating on $[0,1]$ and interchanging its absolutely convergent sum with the integral. Its absolutely convergent Fourier series, evaluated at zero, proves the Poisson summation formula in this case. HenceFor $\Re s>1$, termwise integration and the defining integral of the Gamma function give the Mellin representation of the completed Riemann zeta function:Split at one and substitute $u=1/v$ in the lower integral. The elementary part isand the remaining part becomes an integral over $[1,\infty )$. ThusThe integral is an entire function of $s$, because $\Theta (u)-1$ decays exponentially and uniform convergence holds on every compact subset of the complex plane. This proves meromorphic continuation of the completed Riemann zeta function, with only the displayed simple poles, and the right side is invariant under $s\mapsto 1-s$. ThereforeThe Gamma reflection formula and Gamma duplication formula give the equivalent form $\zeta (s)=2^s{\pi }^{s-1}\sin (\pi s/2)\Gamma (1-s)\zeta (1-s)$, understood by meromorphic continuation. Multiplication by $s(s-1)/2$ gives the entire Riemann xi function $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$.

Let $N(T)$ count positive ordinates of Nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function up to height $T$, including multiplicity. The Riemann–von Mangoldt formula isMore precisely, away from ordinates of zeros, the constant term is $7/8$, the additional term is $S(T)={\pi }^{-1}\arg \zeta (1/2+iT)$, and the remaining error is $O(T^{-1})$. Here the argument is continued along $2\to 2+iT\to 1/2+iT$, and $S(T)=O(\log T)$. The coarse formula displayed above holds at all large heights with the usual right-continuous counting convention. Subtract it at $T+1$ and $T$: the main term changes by $O(\log T)$ and each error is $O(\log T)$. Hence

For infinitely many reciprocal-logarithmic gaps between zeta zeros, fix any $0<c<2\pi$, for example $c=\pi$. Suppose all sufficiently late gaps satisfied ${\gamma }_{n+1}-{\gamma }_n\le c/\log n$. Summing and usinggives ${\gamma }_n\le (c+o(1))n/\log n$. The last elementary estimate follows by integral comparison with $1/\log t$ and one integration by parts. The Riemann–von Mangoldt formula would implya contradiction. This reasoning is valid whether repeated ordinates are listed according to multiplicity or only distinct ordinates are listed, since in either case $n\le N({\gamma }_n)$. Consequently ${\gamma }_{n+1}-{\gamma }_n>c/\log n$ infinitely often, for any fixed $0<c<2\pi$.

Use the Jacobi theta function $\Theta (t)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}{e}^{-\pi n^{2}t}$, $t>0$. Its transformation law follows directly from the Gaussian Fourier transform. With the Fourier transform convention $\hat{f}(\xi )={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}f(u)e^{-2\pi i\xi u}du$,For example, differentiating the transform and using integration by parts gives ${\hat{f}}^{\prime }(\xi )=-(2\pi \xi /t)\hat{f}(\xi )$; its value at zero is the Gaussian integral $t^{-1/2}$. Periodize the Gaussian. Its Fourier coefficients are these transforms at integer frequencies, and both series converge absolutely, so evaluating its Fourier series at zero proves the Poisson summation formula here:

For $\Re s>1$, integrating the exponentially convergent series termwise gives the Mellin representation of the completed Riemann zeta functionSplit at one and substitute $u=1/t$ in the lower part, using the transformation just proved. The contribution of $t^{-1/2}-1$ is $1/(s-1)-1/s$. We obtain the pole-subtracted theta integral for the completed zeta functionThe integral is entire: $\Theta (t)-1$ decays exponentially, uniformly dominating the integrand and all its $s$ derivatives on compact sets. Both the rational term and the integral are invariant under $s\mapsto 1-s$. This proves the meromorphic identityEquivalently the Riemann xi functionis entire and satisfies $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$. The reflection and duplication formulas for the Gamma function turn the same identity intounderstood by meromorphic continuation at removable exceptional points. This establishes the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function, rather than assuming it.

If $N(T)$ counts zeros $\rho =\beta +i\gamma$ in the critical strip with $0<\gamma \le T$, including zero multiplicity, the Riemann–von Mangoldt formula isAt a zero ordinate one may instead use the conventional half-weight boundary count; that only alters the stated error. In particular $N(T)\sim T\log T/(2\pi )$.

To invert without assuming simple zeros, fix $0<\epsilon <1$ and set $T_n^{\pm }=(1\pm \epsilon )2\pi n/\log n$. Then $\log T_n^{\pm }/\log n\to 1$, soFor large $n$, $N(T_n^{-})<n<N(T_n^{+})$, and hence $T_n^{-}<{\gamma }_n\le T_n^{+}$. Let $\epsilon \downarrow 0$. The asymptotic inversion of the zeta zero count givesAs in the zero-counting formula, the sequence lists ordinates with zero multiplicity; “increasing” means nondecreasing here. The argument does not require the Riemann hypothesis or simplicity of zeros.

Use the Fourier transform convention $\hat{h}(\xi )={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}h(x)e^{-2\pi ix\xi }dx$. For a Schwartz function $h$, the Poisson summation formula isTo prove it, periodize $h$ as $P(x)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}h(x+n)$. Rapid decay of all derivatives makes this a smooth periodic function, with uniform termwise differentiability. Its $m$th Fourier coefficient iswhere absolute convergence justifies splitting the real-line integral into unit intervals. Integration by parts gives rapid decay of the coefficients of $P$, so its Fourier series converges absolutely and uniformly to $P$. Evaluate it at zero to obtain the formula.

For $\mathrm{Im}\tau >0$ and $z\in \mathbb{C}$, take the complex Gaussian function $h(x)=e^{\pi i\tau x^2+2\pi izx}$. It is a Schwartz function of the real variable $x$. Its Fourier transform isThe real Gaussian integral proves this first for $\tau =iy$, $y>0$, and real $z$. Normal convergence of the defining integrals makes both sides entire in $z$ and holomorphic in $\tau \in \mathbb{H}$, so the identity theorem extends it to the stated domain. Choose the square-root branch holomorphic for $-i\tau$ in the right half-plane and positive when $\tau =iy$.

Applying Poisson summation gives the transformation of the Jacobi theta function:The series on the right is ${\vartheta }_{00}(z/\tau ,-1/\tau )$. Rearranging therefore givesThe branch choice is part of the formula; at $\tau =i$ its square-root factor equals one.

Here the sphere's “volume” is its intrinsic $(N-1)$-dimensional area, not the volume of the enclosed ball. Write ${\Omega }_{N-1}$ for the area of the unit sphere. The Gaussian integral givesFor completeness the one-dimensional integral is positive and its square is $2\pi {\int }_0^{\infty }\rho e^{-{\rho }^2}d\rho =\pi$. In hyperspherical coordinates, the same integral isThe substitution is $u={\rho }^2$, and the last integral defines the Gamma function. Equating the two evaluations and scaling lengths by $r$ proves

Take $D$ to mean spacetime dimension, so the number of spatial dimensions is $d=D-1$. This convention is needed when comparing five-dimensional spacetime with four-dimensional spacetime. For a point charge $q$, Gauss's law in $d$ spatial dimensions givesUsing $E_r=-{\varphi }^{\prime }(r)$ and choosing $\varphi (\infty )=0$ for $d>2$ givesThe Green function of the Laplacian with $-{\nabla }^2{G}_d={\delta }^{(d)}$ is consequently $G_d(r)=1/[(d-2){\Omega }_{d-1}{r}^{d-2}]$. Define the gravitational Poisson coupling ${\kappa }_D$ by ${\nabla }^2\Psi ={\kappa }_{D}M{\delta }^{(d)}$, and use acceleration $\mathbf{g}=-\nabla \Psi$. The same flux calculation givesThis explicitly fixes the normalization of the gravitational coupling: in four dimensions ${\kappa }_4=4\pi G_4$, so ${\Psi }_4=-G_{4}M/r$. If a higher-dimensional Newton constant is instead defined by the force law $|\mathbf{g}|=G_{D}M/r^{D-2}$, then ${\kappa }_D={\Omega }_{D-2}{G}_D$ in the displayed expression. In all conventions the force scales as $r^{-(D-2)}$ and the potential as $r^{-(D-3)}$. If “$D$ dimensions” denotes spatial dimensions instead, replace $d$ by $D$ and the potential exponent is $D-2$.

For $d=2$, integration gives $\varphi =-q\log (r/r_0)/(2\pi {\epsilon }_3)$ and $\Psi ={\kappa }_{3}M\log (r/r_0)/(2\pi )$ for the Poisson-normalized gravitational model; these logarithmic potentials have no zero-at-infinity convention. For $d=1$, a fundamental solution of the negative Laplacian is $G_1(x)=-|x|/2$, giving linear potentials up to an additive homogeneous solution.

Now compactify the fourth spatial coordinate $y$ on a circle of circumference $L=2\pi R$, retaining three noncompact coordinates with radial distance $r$. In uncompactified five-dimensional spacetime, $G_4(r,y)=1/[4{\pi }^2(r^2+y^2)]$. A periodic point source is therefore represented by its images:For $r/L\to \infty$, write the sum as $r^{-2}{\sum }_n[1+(nL/r{)}^2{]}^{-1}$ on the source slice $y=0$. The spacing $L/r$ tends to zero, so its Riemann sum approaches the integrable function's integral:Thus the compactified Green function is asymptotic to $1/(4\pi Lr)$, already proving the four-dimensional inverse-distance law.

An exact expression makes the crossover transparent. The Fourier transform of $(r^2+y^2{)}^{-1}$ is $\pi e^{-r|k|}/r$, obtained by closing the integration contour around $y=ir$ or $-ir$. Applying the Poisson summation formula then gives, at $y=0$,The last equality sums a geometric series. Hence the point-source potential with one compact spatial dimension isAt short distances $r\ll L$, $\coth (\pi r/L)\sim L/(\pi r)$ and these reproduce the five-dimensional $1/r^2$ potentials. At long distances $r\gg L$, the hyperbolic factor is $1+O(e^{-2\pi r/L})$, giving the four-dimensional $1/r$ potentials with effective Poisson couplings ${\epsilon }_4=L{\epsilon }_5$ and ${\kappa }_4={\kappa }_5/L$. Equivalently only the massless Kaluza-Klein mode survives at long distance, while the massive modes contribute exponentially suppressed terms.

Use the Fourier transform convention $\hat{f}(u)={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}f(x)e^{-2\pi iux}dx$. A version of the Poisson summation formula sufficient here isBoth sums converge absolutely. To prove it, form the periodization of a Schwartz function $P(x)={\sum }_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}f(x+n)$. The rapid decay of $f$ and all its derivatives makes this series and its differentiated series uniformly convergent on $[0,1]$, so $P$ is smooth and one-periodic. Its Fourier coefficients areRepeated integration by parts makes these coefficients rapidly decreasing. Thus ${\sum }_m\hat{f}(m)e^{2\pi imx}$ converges absolutely and uniformly and has the same coefficients as $P$. By uniqueness of Fourier series it equals $P$. Evaluation at zero proves the formula.

For $u>0$, the Gaussian $f(x)=e^{-\pi u{x}^2}$ has transform $u^{-1/2}{e}^{-\pi m^2/u}$. This follows from the Gaussian integral at frequency zero and integration by parts, which gives the differential equation ${\hat{f}}^{\prime }(v)=-(2\pi v/u)\hat{f}(v)$. Hence the Jacobi theta functionsatisfies $\Theta (u)=u^{-1/2}\Theta (1/u)$.

Use the normalization of the completed Riemann zeta functionInitially, for $\Re s>1$, the Gamma function integral and absolute convergence give its Mellin transform representationIndeed, the two equal terms for $n$ and $-n$ cancel the factor $1/2$, and the $n$th integral is ${\pi }^{-s/2}\Gamma (s/2)n^{-s}$.

Split at $u=1$ and use the theta transformation in the integral over $(0,1)$. Its elementary part isIn the remaining part substitute $v=1/u$. DefineThe pole-subtracted theta integral for the completed zeta function is thereforeSince $\Theta (u)-1=O(e^{-\pi u})$ for $u\ge 1$, both integrals and every derivative in $s$ converge uniformly on compact subsets of $\mathbb{C}$. Thus $J$ is an entire function. The boxed identity supplies the meromorphic continuation of $\Xi$ to the whole plane, with no other singularities. Its poles really are simple, because the residues of the displayed rational terms are nonzero:The identity also gives $\Xi (s)=\Xi (1-s)$, the completed functional equation of the Riemann zeta function.

Use the meromorphic completionThe functional equation of the Riemann zeta function isIts entire version is $\xi (s)=\frac{1}{2}s(s-1)Z(s)$ with $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$. The completion $Z$ itself has poles at zero and one; it should not be confused with the entire Riemann xi function.

We prove the equation by a theta integral. SetThe Gaussian Fourier transform, with kernel $e^{-2\pi ixy}$, isFor example, differentiation in $y$ and integration by parts give the differential equation $I^{\prime }(y)=-(2\pi y/t)I(y)$; the Gaussian integral gives $I(0)=t^{-1/2}$. Periodize the Gaussian by summing $e^{-\pi t(x+n{)}^2}$ over integers $n$. Its $k$th Fourier coefficient is the displayed transform at $k$. Both the periodized function and its Fourier series converge absolutely, so evaluation at $x=0$ gives the Poisson summation formula in this case:

For $\mathrm{Re}s>1$, integration term by term in the Gamma function integral givesIndeed, the two terms for $n$ and $-n$ cancel the factor $1/2$, and substitution $v=\pi n^{2}t$ gives ${\pi }^{-s/2}\Gamma (s/2)n^{-s}$. Split at one, and use the transformation above in the integral from zero to one. The elementary contribution isSubstitution $t=1/u$ in the remaining term therefore givesThe theta tail decays exponentially. The integral is consequently an entire function of $s$, with uniform convergence and termwise differentiation on compact subsets. The formula continues $Z$ meromorphically to the whole plane. Both its rational part and its integral are unchanged by $s\mapsto 1-s$, proving the equation and the entire xi formulation. Using the reflection and duplication identities of the Gamma function, one may equivalently writeunderstood as an identity of meromorphic functions, including points where individual factors need continuation.

Now let $N(T)$ count the Nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function $\rho =\beta +i\gamma$ with $0<\gamma \le T$, including multiplicity. The Riemann–von Mangoldt formula isFor $T$ not a zero ordinate, the more precise usual form isHere the argument is continued from $\zeta (2)>0$ along the path $2\to 2+iT\to \frac{1}{2}+iT$. The first formula remains valid at zero ordinates with the stated endpoint convention. Only its leading asymptotic is needed below.

List the positive ordinates as ${\gamma }_1\le {\gamma }_2\le \cdots$, with multiplicity, consistent with this counting function. Put $b_n=2\pi n/\log n$. For every fixed $\epsilon \in (0,1)$,For all sufficiently large $n$, the lower count is less than $n$ and the upper count is greater than $n$. Consequently $(1-\epsilon )b_n<{\gamma }_n\le (1+\epsilon )b_n$. Letting $\epsilon \downarrow 0$ proves the asymptotic inversion of the zeta zero countThis argument works even when several zeros have the same ordinate; “increasing” is interpreted in the standard nondecreasing, multiplicity-counted sense. A count listing only distinct ordinates is a different object and is not determined by this formula alone.

In this notation the Riemann hypothesis says that every Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function has real part one-half:It concerns their horizontal location, not merely the growth of the ordinates, and does not assert that the zeros are simple. The functional equation and complex conjugation make the zero set symmetric about both the real axis and the critical line; the hypothesis puts all the Nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function on that line.

Use the Fourier transform convention $\hat{g}(\xi )={\int }_{\mathbb{R}}g(x)e^{-2\pi ix\xi }dx$. For $t>0$, completing the square in the Gaussian integral givesBoth functions are rapidly decreasing, so the Poisson summation formula applies:In terms of the Jacobi theta function, this is $\vartheta (i/t)=\sqrt{t}\vartheta (it)$. The theta series converges locally uniformly in the complex upper half-plane, defining a holomorphic function. The branch of $\sqrt{-i\tau }$ with positive value at $\tau =it$ is holomorphic there, because $-i\tau$ lies in the right half-plane. Both sides of the proposed inversion identity are holomorphic; agreement on the positive imaginary axis and the identity theorem giveEquivalently, the complex Gaussian has transform $(-i\tau {)}^{-1/2}\exp (-\pi i{\xi }^2/\tau )$, which produces the same identity directly by Poisson summation.

Put $\psi (t)=(\vartheta (it)-1)/2={\sum }_{n\ge 1}{e}^{-\pi n^{2}t}$. For $\mathrm{Re}s>1$, integrate term by term in its Mellin transform:The theta function inversion givesSplit the integral at one. In the term containing $\psi (1/t)$ put $t=1/u$. The elementary remainder integral isThus the pole-subtracted theta integral for the completed zeta function isThe integral is entire by exponential decay. This supplies a meromorphic continuation with simple poles at zero and one, of residues $-1$ and $1$. The expression is unchanged by $s\mapsto 1-s$, proving the functional equation of the Riemann zeta functionThe reflection and duplication identities $\Gamma (z)\Gamma (1-z)=\pi /\sin \pi z$ and $\Gamma (z)\Gamma (z+1/2)=2^{1-2z}\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (2z)$ convert it toMultiplying $Z$ by $s(s-1)/2$ removes its two poles and yields the Riemann xi function, which is an entire function, satisfying $\xi (s)=\xi (1-s)$.