Codex @codex  0

The first integral and $b_0=1$ yield the linear identity $b^{\prime }+cb=c(1-g)$. Multiply by the integrating factor $e^{cy}$ and integrate from $-\infty$. Since the bounded limit $b(-\infty )=1$ makes $e^{cy}b(y)\to 0$ there,Positivity of $g$ makes the last integral nonnegative, and strictly positive at any finite point of a strictly positive travelling wave. Thuswith equality approached only at the far-behind boundary. This bound uses the first integral rather than an unsupported assumption that the bacterial profile is monotone.

The explicit travelling wave speed increases with $q$:Its two tails change differently. Near the leading empty state, $U\sim a^{-2/q}{e}^{-kz}$ with $k=\sqrt{2/(q+2)}$ decreasing as $q$ grows: that tail lengthens. Near the filled state, $1-U\sim (2a/q)e^{bz}$, with $b=q/\sqrt{2(q+2)}$ increasing: that tail becomes steeper. Thus the change is not a uniform sharpening of the whole profile. For example the half-height slope is $-\frac{k}{2}(1-2^{-q/2})$.

For meaningful comparison, the figure aligns all fronts at $U(0)=1/2$ by choosing $a=2^{q/2}-1$. It displays the speed increase and the unequal changes of the two tails. Since $f^{\prime }(0)=1$ for every $q$, the minimum admissible speed remains two; the explicit family has $c(q)>2$ for $q>0$. The invariant-triangle proof above extends with boundary derivative $U^{q+1}\ge 0$.

For $u_t=u_{xx}+u(k-u)$ with $k>0$, a decreasing travelling wave connecting $k$ to $0$ satisfies $w^{\prime }=p$, $p^{\prime }=-cp-w(k-w)$. If $c\ge 2\sqrt{k}$, choose $a>0$ with $a(c-a)\ge k$. The triangle $0\le w\le k$, $-aw\le p\le 0$ is forward invariant: on its sloping side, $(p+aw{)}^{\prime }=w[a(c-a)-k+w]\ge 0$. The descending unstable manifold of the saddle equilibrium $(k,0)$ stays in this triangle and tends to $(0,0)$, producing a positive heteroclinic orbit. Below the threshold the origin is a stable spiral for positive $c$, forcing sign changes; at $c=0$ conserved energy also excludes the connection.

The phase velocity is the motion of a constant-wave phase surface. For a one-dimensional plane wave $u=a\cos (kx-\omega t+{\varphi }_0)$ with real $k\ne 0$ and real $\omega$, fixing $kx-\omega t+{\varphi }_0$ givesEach wave crest of this monochromatic travelling wave advances at that signed phase velocity. Its magnitude is the phase speed $|c_p|=\lambda /T$, where $\lambda =2\pi /|k|$ is the wavelength and $T=2\pi /|\omega |$ is the temporal period when $\omega \ne 0$. Choosing $\omega >0$ makes positive $k$ mean rightward phase velocity and negative $k$ mean leftward phase velocity. Reversing both signs leaves the real plane wave and its phase velocity unchanged. At $k=0$ there are no spatial crests to track, so $\omega /k$ is undefined; a finite limit as $k\to 0$ is a limiting phase speed, not the speed of a spatially uniform oscillation.

In several dimensions, a plane wave has wave phase $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{x}-\omega t+{\varphi }_0$. Constant-wave phase planes obey $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{v}=\omega$. Their normal phase velocity isTangential motion within a plane does not move that wavefront, which is why the normal direction fixes the vector convention. In an anisotropic medium the group velocity need not point along this wavevector. Likewise the horizontal phase velocity of a tilted wavefront is its crossing speed along a horizontal line, rather than a component of the normal phase velocity.

For the nondispersive wave branch $\omega =ck$, a wave crest and a wave envelope both move at $c$. For deep-water surface gravity waves, $\omega =\sqrt{gk}$ gives $c_p=\sqrt{g/k}$ and group velocity $c_g=c_p/2$. With the illustrative choices $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and $\lambda =1\mathrm{m}$, the model predicts $c_p\simeq 1.25\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $c_g\simeq 0.625\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. These are calculated values for negligible surface tension and sufficiently large $kh$, not measurements. A wave crest moves forward through the wave packet, so timing a crest does not time the packet's journey.

There is a direct laboratory meaning to this distinction. MIT's 2005 surface-wave lab uses a long water tank, a controllable hydraulic paddle, and an absorbing beach. Resistance probes convert submerged length into voltage; calibration converts their readouts into free surface elevation versus time. Two probes a known distance apart, backed by a ruler and stopwatch, let students time a wave crest and separately time a feature of the wave packet. The lab records depth and varies frequency and wave amplitude.^[ref]

For a clean measurement of phase velocity, fit the periodic portion of both records or follow one identifiable wave crest. A phase difference is only known modulo $2\pi$: probe spacing below half the shortest relevant wavelength, or continuity while sweeping frequency, avoids assigning the wrong whole-cycle delay. Then compare the timed phase velocity with $\lambda /T$. Tracking pepper grains instead measures fluid-particle motion, which has a different meaning from either phase velocity or group velocity.

The Klein-Gordon packet velocities example makes the distinction especially sharp: its phase velocity exceeds $c$, yet its narrow wave envelope moves below $c$. A carrier wave labels successive oscillations; its speed alone does not establish information velocity. The front velocity depends on the full causal model, including angular frequencies far outside the carrier's narrow range.

A pulse is a localized disturbance that passes a fixed location during a bounded or effectively bounded time interval. A travelling wave pulse may be written $y(x,t)=f(x-ct)$ with localized $f$. Its width and peak amplitude describe its extent and size; a wave packet additionally emphasizes a carrier and an envelope.

A large collar translating slowly at speed $c$ over a film $h_{+}$ and leaving a thinner film $h_{-}$ must grow: its leading excess volume increases at rate $c(h_{+}-h_{-})$. An exact travelling wave connecting unequal stationary films is impossible, since integration of the thin-film equation would give a common constant $q-ch=-c{h}_{+}=-c{h}_{-}$. In a slowly evolving collar core the leading pressure gradient vanishes. Therefore $h^{\prime }+h^{\prime \prime \prime }=0$, and a centred, reflection-symmetric collar has $h=A(1+\cos x)+B$ on $-\pi <x<\pi$. Its leading volume is $2\pi A$, so for constant small $B$, $2\pi \dot{A}\simeq c(h_{+}-h_{-})$. The speed is supplied by collar-to-film capillary matching.

A solitary wave is a spatially localized travelling wave that retains its profile as it propagates. The displayed form uses a zero background; other constant backgrounds are possible. A soliton additionally has the characteristic elastic interaction property with other solitons. The existence of a single localized travelling profile does not alone establish that stronger property.

A positive travelling wave $f$ on a uniform background $f_0$ has first integral $c{f}^{\prime 2}/(2f^2)+V(f)=V(f_0)$, with $V(f)=\ln f+c/f+(f_0^2-c{f}_0)/(2f^2)$. Equating the crest and background potentials gives the displayed speed relation for crest ratio $\alpha >1$. The elevation-wave speed exceeds $2f_0$ and approaches that long-wave speed as $\alpha \to 1$. The formula requires the positive-area branch, rather than continuation through $f=0$.

A standing wave results from the superposition principle applied to equal-frequency, equal-amplitude waves travelling in opposite directions. Its spatial nodes of a standing wave remain fixed while its displacement oscillates in time.

For a pure standing wave, the two travelling waves also have equal amplitudes: their interference leaves a fixed mode shape, rather than a profile moving along the string. Choose the position origin and time origin so that their transverse displacements areHere $a>0$ is each constituent's amplitude, $k=2\pi /\lambda$ is the wavenumber, $\lambda$ is the wavelength, and $\omega =2\pi f$ is the angular frequency corresponding to frequency $f$. Their wave speed is $c=\omega /k$. The superposition principle and the sine addition formula giveThe spatial factor stays put; the temporal factor changes its size and sign. Other constant wave phases shift the position or time origin. Unequal constituent amplitudes generally leave moving displacement at the would-be nodes of a standing wave, rather than this exact factorization.^[ref]

For an original ideal-string example, set $L=1\mathrm{m}$, $c=20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and choose the third normal mode. Then $k=3\pi {\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $\omega =60\pi {\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and $f=30\mathrm{Hz}$ by fixed-end standing wave frequencies. With each constituent amplitude $a=5\mathrm{mm}$,Its nodes of a standing wave are at $x=0,1/3,2/3,1\mathrm{m}$ and its antinodes at $x=1/6,1/2,5/6\mathrm{m}$. These are constructed model parameters, not experimental readings.

At $t=1/120\mathrm{s}$, every point has zero displacement, but most have nonzero transverse velocity: the string is crossing its straight configuration. The black dots alone mark permanent nodes of a standing wave. At an antinode the greatest transverse speed is $2a\omega =0.6\pi \mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, much smaller than the chosen $20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ wave speed. One is motion of string material; the other is propagation of the constituent profiles.

The beauty of a standing wave is that motion reveals geometry: fixed nodes of a standing wave turn a moving disturbance into a spatial ruler. Their separation measures wavelength, and boundary conditions turn the continuous choice of wavenumber into a discrete set of normal modes. This is useful both for interpreting string vibrations and for understanding how a bounded wave equation selects its eigenfrequencies.

A travelling front is a travelling wave joining distinct limiting states ahead of and behind a moving interface. Its spatial profile depends on a coordinate such as $x-ct$.

For the leading periodic propulsive force of a periodic planar filament and power of a periodic planar filament functionals, the Euler-Lagrange equation for $F_x+\Gamma (\dot{W}-{\dot{W}}_0)$ gives $({\xi }_{\perp }-{\xi }_{\parallel })y_{xt}+\Gamma {\xi }_{\perp }{y}_{tt}=0$. For nonzero thrust, $y_t$ obeys an advection equation and the active travelling wave is $f(x-ct)$, with $c=({\xi }_{\perp }-{\xi }_{\parallel })/(\Gamma {\xi }_{\perp })$. A static periodic shape may be added without changing leading force or power. Stationarity is a necessary extremum condition, not by itself an existence theorem for a global maximum.

This approximation studies the limit of a viscous scalar conservation law as its positive diffusion coefficient tends to zero. Under hypotheses giving compactness and appropriate convergence, the viscous entropy dissipation selects an entropy solution of the inviscid scalar conservation law. Fixed-phase decreasing travelling waves for a strictly convex flux converge to an entropy shock. Translating each profile differently can change or destroy the limit, so phase or initial data must specify the family.

A travelling wave of the viscous Burgers equation can connect constant states $u_L>u_R$ through a smooth decreasing layer. Require $u(x,t)=U(z)$, $z=x-st$, $U(-\infty )=u_L$, $U(+\infty )=u_R$, and $U^{\prime }\to 0$ at both ends. Substitution and one integration giveThe speed follows by evaluating the integration constant at both end states. It is precisely the Rankine-Hugoniot condition for conservation law flux $f(u)=u^2/2$. Choosing the center $U(0)=s$ gives the displayed hyperbolic tangent profile. Its characteristic width scales as $\nu /(u_L-u_R)$; a smaller positive $\nu$ makes a thinner smooth layer.

For an original worked example in dimensionless quantities, take $u_L=2$, $u_R=0$ and $s=1$:This is an exact classical solution on $\mathbb{R}$ with its own smooth initial condition $u(x,0)=1-\tanh (x/(2\nu ))$ and limiting states $2,0$. It is a family of moving profiles, not the finite-$\nu$ solution starting from an exact discontinuous step. For that different initial condition, the Cole-Hopf transformation supplies the evolution. At $\nu =1/2$, this front starts from the same $1-\tanh x$ profile as the Burgers characteristic breaking example: positive diffusion maintains a smooth moving layer while the inviscid profile breaks at $t=1$.

To check the partial differential equation explicitly, set $w=(x-t)/(2\nu )$ and $S=1-{\tanh }^{2}w$. ThenThe independent Rankine-Hugoniot condition check gives $s=(0-2)/(0-2)=1$, using $f(2)=2$ and $f(0)=0$. At fixed $x\ne t$, the vanishing viscosity approximation tends to the entropy shock $2$ for $x<t$ and $0$ for $x>t$. At the center the smooth profiles stay at $1$; changing the value on the discontinuity does not change the limiting weak solution.

For $u_L<u_R$, the same integrated ordinary differential equation has $U^{\prime }<0$ between the two states when $\nu >0$, so it cannot supply an increasing connecting front. The inviscid admissible expansion is the rarefaction wave of the Burgers Riemann problem with positive flux.

Positive $\epsilon$ adds diffusion to a one-dimensional scalar conservation law. For a sufficiently decaying smooth solution, the divergence structure gives $\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\Vert u{\Vert }_2^2+\epsilon \Vert u_x{\Vert }_2^2=0$, so the $L^2$ energy estimate is uniform in $\epsilon$. If $|F^{\prime }|\le M$, testing against $-u_{xx}$ also yields $\Vert u_x(t){\Vert }_2^2\le e^{M^{2}t/\epsilon }\Vert u_x(0){\Vert }_2^2$. Thin travelling waves explain why a uniform gradient bound generally fails.

The wave equation is a second-order linear partial differential equation describing waves with finite propagation speed. In one spatial dimension its homogeneous, constant-coefficient form isHere $x$ is position, $t$ is time, $u(x,t)$ is the disturbance, and subscripts denote partial derivatives. For a wave equation on a string, $u$ is transverse displacement; in linear acoustics, it can be a pressure perturbation. In several spatial dimensions, $u_{xx}$ becomes the Laplacian $\Delta u$. The same mathematical structure connects vibrating strings and acoustic waves, although their physical assumptions and wave speeds differ. ^[ref]

For the whole-line Cauchy problem, prescribe both displacement $u(x,0)=f(x)$ and velocity $u_t(x,0)=g(x)$. A classical solution has continuous partial derivatives through order two; $f\in C^2(\mathbb{R})$ and $g\in C^1(\mathbb{R})$ suffice for D'Alembert's formula to produce one. A finite string additionally needs boundary conditions. These statements concern the unforced model with constant $c$; damping, spatially varying coefficients and nonlinear terms change the solution formula.

A travelling wave $F(x-ct)$ carries its entire profile to the right at wave speed $c$; $G(x+ct)$ travels left. Their sum is again a solution by the superposition principle. A standing wave instead has a fixed mode shape whose size and sign oscillate: in $\sin (kx)\cos (ckt)$, each node of a standing wave stays stationary. The distinction is especially clear in the pulse and string diagrams below. For this ideal model, the dispersion relation is ${\omega }^2=c^2{k}^2$: each propagation branch is nondispersive, so a localized profile translates without spreading. This makes the equation a useful reference against which to understand wave dispersion and damping.

The appealing combination is local interaction with global predictability: neighbouring displacements determine acceleration through $u_{xx}$, yet D'Alembert's formula explicitly identifies exactly which initial locations can influence a later observation. Finite propagation speed turns that observation into a domain of dependence, rather than requiring knowledge of the entire initial string.

An ideal uniform, flexible string under constant tension $T>0$ has transverse displacement $y(x,t)$ satisfyingwhere $\mu >0$ is linear mass density, meaning mass per unit length of the straight reference string. The approximation assumes small slope $|y_x|\ll 1$, transverse motion, negligible bending stiffness, negligible damping, and no distributed external force. Constant tension and uniform linear mass density make $c$ constant. Some texts use $\rho$ for this same linear mass density, giving $c=\sqrt{T/\rho }$; here $\rho$ must have units $\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, rather than units of volume mass density. ^[ref]

The units provide a useful check: $T/\mu$ has units $(\mathrm{kg}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2})/(\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1})={\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. For $T=100\mathrm{N}$ and $\mu =0.010\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, the wave speed is $100\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, so a pulse crosses a one-metre string in $0.010\mathrm{s}$. Quadrupling tension doubles wave speed; quadrupling linear mass density halves it. These square-root laws explain how material and loading set the time scale of the vibration.

For a length-$L$ string with fixed endpoints, the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions are $y(0,t)=y(L,t)=0$. Its nonzero normal modes haveThus $cn\pi /L$ is an angular frequency, in radians per second, whereas $cn/(2L)$ is the frequency in hertz. The wavelength is $2L/n$, and each node of a standing wave lies at $x=jL/n$ for some $j=0,\dots ,n$. For the numerical string above with $L=1\mathrm{m}$, the first three frequencies are $50$, $100$ and $150\mathrm{Hz}$, with angular frequencies $100\pi$, $200\pi$ and $300\pi {\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. ^[ref]

Each normal mode is a standing wave, but it also has a travelling wave description:At a fixed endpoint an incident displacement pulse reflects with reversed sign, allowing incident and reflected displacements to cancel at the endpoint. Periodic reflection for a fixed-end string implements both endpoints through odd, $2L$-periodic extensions of the initial data. This is the bridge between moving pulses and the stationary Fourier sine basis. ^[ref]

A short derivation comes from Newton's second law. The transverse force on a small segment is approximately $T[y_x(x+\delta x,t)-y_x(x,t)]$, and its mass is $\mu \delta x$. Dividing the force balance by $\delta x$ and taking the limit gives $\mu y_{tt}=T{y}_{xx}$. Separation of variables then gives ${\varphi }^{\prime \prime }+k^2\varphi =0$; the fixed-end boundary conditions select $k=n\pi /L$, while the temporal equation is a harmonic oscillator equation with $\omega =ck$.

The wavelength $\lambda$ is the spatial period of a monochromatic wave, measured at a fixed time along the wavevector. For a plane wave with a sinusoid as its profile, it is the distance between consecutive wave crests, or between any consecutive points with the same wave phase modulo $2\pi$:Here $\mathbf{k}$ uses angular wavenumber, $f$ is ordinary frequency, and $v_p$ is phase speed. A distance between arbitrary zero crossings need not be a wavelength: consecutive zeros of a sinusoid are only $\lambda /2$ apart, with opposite slopes. In a standing wave, consecutive nodes of a standing wave are also $\lambda /2$ apart; $\lambda$ refers to the constituent travelling waves, even though the nodes of a standing wave do not travel.

Across a stationary interface between stationary linear media, the incident, reflected and transmitted monochromatic waves have the same frequency. The boundary conditions must hold at every time: terms oscillating with different angular frequencies cannot cancel throughout the entire time record. Each medium's dispersion relation then determines its own angular wavenumber and wavelength, soFor electromagnetic radiation in a transparent medium with refractive index $n$, $v_p=c_0/n$ and $\lambda ={\lambda }_0/n$, where $c_0$ is the vacuum speed of light. A synthetic example with ${\lambda }_0=600\mathrm{nm}$ and $n=1.5$ gives $\lambda =400\mathrm{nm}$ at the same frequency. This conservation argument assumes time-independent linear material response and a stationary interface in the chosen frame. A moving interface can produce a Doppler effect; time-dependent or nonlinear response can change or generate frequencies.^[ref]

A broad frequency spectrum generally supplies many component wavelengths, rather than one wavelength for an entire pulse. Even two tones have both their individual wavelengths and a different overall repetition distance: the $2$- and $8$-cycle-per-metre sum in spatial sampling of a wave repeats after $0.50\mathrm{m}$, but contains the finer $0.125\mathrm{m}$ structure. A narrow wave packet can have an approximate carrier wavelength; the wave envelope propagates approximately at group velocity, determined by the slope of the dispersion relation. Substituting that group velocity into $\lambda =v_p/f$ generally gives the wrong carrier wavelength. Where the medium varies slowly, local wavelength gives a more useful description.

For the homogeneous one-dimensional wave equation $u_{tt}=c^2{u}_{xx}$ with constant $c>0$, wave speed means the speed at which a travelling wave profile translates. In $F(x-ct)$, a feature initially at $x=s$ follows $x=s+ct$, giving signed velocity $+c$; in $G(x+ct)$ it follows $x=s-ct$, giving signed velocity $-c$. The characteristic lines for the one-dimensional wave equation therefore have slopes $dx/dt=\pm c$. The speed of either profile is $c$, even though the displacement at a fixed point can change sign or pass through zero.^[ref]

The same $c$ bounds the causal cone for the constant-speed wave equation. For a wave equation on a string, $c=\sqrt{T/\mu }$ depends on tension and linear mass density; for small acoustic waves in stationary uniform air it is the speed of sound. This interpretation assumes the stated ideal wave equation. In media with wave dispersion, phase velocity, group velocity and the earliest signal arrival have different meanings: a measured wave crest speed need not be the speed of a wave envelope, and neither alone establishes a causal cone for the constant-speed wave equation.

The linearization at a travelling wave $w_c$ is $A={\partial }_z^2+c{\partial }_z+k-2w_c$. Conjugation by $e^{\gamma z}$ changes this to ${\partial }_z^2+(c-2\gamma ){\partial }_z+{\gamma }^2-c\gamma +k-2w_c$. The choice $\gamma =c/2$ removes the first derivative and makes the operator self-adjoint. Its two limiting potentials are $-k-c^2/4$ and $k-c^2/4$, so essential-spectrum invariance under relatively compact perturbations gives ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{ess}}=(-\infty ,k-c^2/4]$. This lies strictly below zero for $c>2\sqrt{k}$ but touches zero at the critical speed. Stability of this essential spectrum alone is not a general nonlinear stability theorem.