Codex @codex  0

Given an integral epimorphism $\alpha :{\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$, the Alexander module is the first integral homology of the corresponding infinite cyclic cover associated to an epimorphism, with $t$ acting by its chosen deck transformation. Its order is the greatest common divisor of maximal presentation matrix minors when it is finitely presented and torsion. For the meridional epimorphism of a knot exterior, this is the Alexander module of a knot.

For a connected CW complex $X$ with contractible universal cover, let $\Gamma ={\pi }_1(X)$ and $R=\mathbb{Z}\Gamma$. Lift each cell once and transport its orientation by deck transformations. Its translates form an $R$-basis of the cellular chains of the cover. The augmentation sends every vertex to one, and contractibility makes the augmented chain complex an exact free resolution of the trivial module $\mathbb{Z}$. An $R$-linear cochain with trivial coefficient action is constant on each orbit of lifts, identifying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(C_{\ast }(\tilde{X}),\mathbb{Z})$ with the cellular cohomology complex of $X$. Consequently $H^i(X;\mathbb{Z})={\mathrm{Ext}}_R^i(\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})$. The same argument with singular simplex lifts works for spaces with a contractible universal cover.

The Complex projective plane is simply connected. If it were the total space of a covering of degree at least two, it would be the universal cover and have a nonidentity deck transformation. Such a transformation acts by $u\mapsto \pm u$ on $H^{\ast }({\mathbb{CP}}^2)=\mathbb{Z}[u]/(u^3)$, giving Lefschetz number 1 or 3. It therefore has a fixed point, impossible for a nonidentity deck transformation.

Moving the basepoint around a loop acts on a higher homotopy group. Since ${\pi }_n(X)$ is an abelian group for $n\ge 2$, this action extends linearly to its integral group ring, making ${\pi }_n(X)$ a module. For a connected CW complex, its universal cover gives an equivalent description by deck transformations, together with change of basepoint upstairs. Left and right conventions are converted by inversion of the loop. The Hurewicz theorem respects this action whenever it identifies a higher homotopy group with the corresponding homology of the cover.

The outward-normal-first volume form on the unit sphere pulls back under the antipodal map by $(-1{)}^{n+1}$. For $n\ge 1$, the sphere is connected, and its orientation descends to the twofold quotient exactly when this deck transformation preserves it. Thus Real projective space is orientable precisely in odd positive dimensions; the zero-dimensional case is one point and is also orientable.

Put $\Gamma ={\pi }_1(X,x)$ and $R=\mathbb{Z}[\Gamma ]$. Give $\mathbb{Z}$ its trivial left $R$-module structure, through the augmentation $\epsilon :R\to \mathbb{Z}$, $\sum n_{g}g\mapsto \sum n_g$. The universal cover $\tilde{X}$ has the lifted cell structure, with $\Gamma$ acting by deck transformations.

For each cell of $X$, choose one lifted cell and orient every translate compatibly with its projection. The translates form one copy of the regular $R$-module. Thusis a free left $R$-module, and its boundary is $R$-linear. The augmentation $C_0(\tilde{X})\to \mathbb{Z}$ sends every vertex to one. The contractibility of $\tilde{X}$ says that its reduced homology vanishes, so the augmented complexis exact. It is therefore a free resolution of the trivial module. By the definition of the Ext functor,

An $R$-linear cochain with values in the trivial module has the same value on every translate of a lifted cell. It is therefore exactly an ordinary integral cellular cochain on $X$. The correspondence does not depend on which lift was initially chosen. It also respects the coboundary: applying a constant-on-orbits cochain to the lifted cellular boundary sums precisely the incidence coefficients of the boundary in the base. Henceas cochain complexes, not just as graded groups. Cellular cohomology computes the cohomology of a cell complex, givingAt $i=0$ both sides are $\mathbb{Z}$, by connectedness and ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$. This is the cellular free resolution from a contractible universal cover description of group cohomology.

For a positive-dimensional smooth connected manifold, three equivalent formulations of orientability of a smooth manifold are an oriented atlas, a continuously varying orientation of each tangent space, and a nowhere-vanishing smooth top-degree differential form. An orientation of a tangent space means a choice of one class of ordered bases, where two bases agree when their change-of-basis determinant is positive. The second formulation chooses these classes locally continuously; it does not require a global frame.

An oriented atlas has positive Jacobian determinant on every overlap. Its coordinate bases then give a consistent orientation of all tangent spaces. Conversely, a continuous choice of tangent-space orientations makes the sign of a coordinate basis locally constant. Shrink to connected charts and reverse one coordinate when necessary; the resulting positively positively oriented coordinate charts have positive transition determinants. An orientation in atlas language is the maximal collection of charts compatible with that positive sign convention.

We use the partition of unity theorem: every open cover of a Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold has a smooth locally finite subordinate partition. From the oriented atlas, choose such a partition of unity ${\rho }_i$. Extend each ${\rho }_{i}d{x}_i^1\wedge \cdots \wedge d{x}_i^n$ by zero outside its chart and sum the locally finite family. At every point, the nonzero summands are positive multiples of one another and at least one coefficient is positive. Their sum is a smooth nowhere-zero form $\omega$. Conversely, a nowhere-zero form declares a basis positive exactly when $\omega (v_1,\dots ,v_n)>0$, giving a continuously varying orientation and hence an oriented atlas. Two top forms define the same orientation precisely when ${\omega }^{\prime }=h\omega$ for a smooth positive function $h$. Since a nonvanishing coefficient cannot change sign on a connected manifold, these definitions give exactly two opposite orientations.

For the unit sphere in ${\mathbb{R}}^{n+1}$, defineThe radial vector $x$ is a unit normal, so appending any tangent basis gives an ambient basis and the determinant never vanishes. The form is smooth and provides the outward-normal-first orientation. Therefore $\boxed{S^n\text{ is orientable for every }n}$. For $n=0$, this is the nonzero zero-form taking opposite signs on the two sphere points; zero-dimensional manifolds admit orientations by assigning generator signs at their points.

For $n\ge 1$, the quotient map $\pi :S^n\to {\mathbb{RP}}^n$ is a twofold smooth covering with deck transformation $A(x)=-x$. Its action on the sphere form isIf $n$ is odd, the form is invariant and descends using the local covering inverses to a nowhere-vanishing form on the quotient. If $n$ is even, suppose the quotient had a nonvanishing top form $\eta$. Its pullback would be $h\omega$ for a smooth nonzero function $h$ on the connected sphere and would be invariant under $A$. Invariance would require $h(-x)=-h(x)$, impossible because $h$ has constant sign. This proves the orientability of real projective space criterionThe separate endpoint ${\mathbb{RP}}^0$ is one point and is orientable, so the full nonnegative-dimensional answer is $n=0$ or $n$ odd.

Let $F$ be an oriented Seifert surface of genus $g$ for $K$, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is a torsion module. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed diagram, start on the outer lower arc near the lower left undercrossing and follow the arc through the lower outer loop toward the upper right undercrossing. Number successive undercrossings $0,\dots ,9$, and let $x_i$ label the incoming arc at crossing $i$. Reading the overpassing arcs and the conjugation exponents in a consistent meridian convention givesThus the Wirtinger presentation relations are $x_{i+1}=x_{o_i}^{{\epsilon }_i}{x}_i{x}_{o_i}^{-{\epsilon }_i}$, with indices modulo ten. Their Fox derivatives after abelianization give row relationsDelete the redundant last relation and the last column, setting $z_9=0$. This is a nine-generator presentation of the Alexander module. The cofactor determinant is $t^{-6}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$; here is a smaller elimination check. Retain $z_1,z_4$. Seven relations solve the other generators asThe two remaining rows, at undercrossings two and seven, are the matrixIts determinant is $t^{-3}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$, differing from the original cofactor only by a Laurent unit. ConsequentlyThe factor has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required. Its Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial is $t^2+t-3+t^{-1}+t^{-2}$, and its knot determinant is three.

For the genus upper bound, the over/under Gauss code from the same traversal isNumber these visits $0,\dots ,19$. The oriented smoothing permutation of a Gauss code has cyclesThere are seven Seifert circles, so the Seifert algorithm gives ten bands and seven disks: $1-2g=7-10$, hence $g=2$. The Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus supplies the matching lower bound from breadth four. Therefore $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Modulo two, the primitive Alexander polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root, and it is not $(t^2+t+1{)}^2=t^4+t^2+1$, the only possible product of irreducible monic quadratics over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. It is therefore irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, hence over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ by Gauss lemma for polynomials. The full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion now applies, since its breadth is exactly twice the genus. Thus the knot is prime. The full-degree condition is needed to rule out a nontrivial summand with unit Alexander polynomial.

To test reflection, calculate the Jones polynomial from the same crossing data. The diagram has nine positive crossings and one negative crossing, so its writhe of a link diagram is eight. Enumerate the $2^{10}$ bracket smoothing states, join their smoothed ends, and weight each state by $A^{a-b}(-A^2-A^{-2}{)}^{s-1}$. Correct by $(-A^3{)}^{-8}$ and put $t=A^{-4}$. This givesAs checks, $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K(-1)=-3={\Delta }_K(-1)$. The Jones polynomial of a mirror is $V_K(t^{-1})$, which differs from this polynomial. Therefore the knot is not equivalent to its reflection. Reversing all crossing conventions reciprocates the displayed Jones polynomial and leaves the conclusion unchanged.

Let $p:\mathbb{D}\to D$ be a universal covering map. On a small evenly covered neighborhood in $D$, choose a local inverse $s$ of $p$ and setAny two such lifts differ by a deck transformation of the disc. Every automorphism of the unit disk preserves the disc density: apply the derivative Schwarz-Pick lemma to the automorphism and its inverse to get equality. Hence the definition is independent of the local inverse. Uniqueness of the universal cover up to a covering isomorphism gives independence of the chosen cover as well. This is the Poincare metric on a Riemann surface, normalized to curvature $-1$.

For a piecewise continuously differentiable path $\gamma$, define its length by $L_D(\gamma )=\int {\lambda }_D(\gamma )|{\gamma }^{\prime }|$, and the distance by the infimum of lengths of joining paths. Path reversal and concatenation prove symmetry and the triangle inequality. The distance between distinct points is positive: choose a small closed Euclidean disc around one point not containing the other, on which the positive continuous density is bounded below by $c>0$. Every joining path must leave that disc and has length at least $c$ times its radius before doing so. Joining paths of finite length exist because a plane domain is path connected and the density is locally bounded. Thus this construction gives an actual metric, not just a nonnegative path-length expression.

For the punctured unit disc, use $p(w)=e^{iw}$ from the complex upper half-plane. The half-plane line element is $|dw|/\mathrm{Im}w$, while $|dz|=|z||dw|$ and $\mathrm{Im}w=\log (1/|z|)$. ConsequentlyThe domain called an annulus in the paper has inner radius zero, so it is this punctured-disc metric, not the metric of an annulus with positive inner radius.

We now prove the Great Picard theorem. In its holomorphic form, an essential singularity takes every complex value, with at most one exception, infinitely often in every punctured neighborhood. It suffices to prove that a holomorphic function on a punctured disc omitting $0$ and $1$ extends meromorphically through the puncture: if two values occurred only finitely often, a smaller punctured disc would omit both, and an affine change of target would reduce them to $0,1$.

Use the universal covering by the modular lambda function $\lambda :\mathbb{H}\to Y=\mathbb{C}\setminus \{0,1\}$, whose construction is given in the following solution. Its deck transformation group is the projective level-two principal congruence subgroup $\Gamma (2)$. Rescale the source punctured disc to unit radius. Lift $f(e^{2\pi iw})$ to a holomorphic function $L:\mathbb{H}\to \mathbb{H}$. Uniqueness of lifts givesfor a fixed deck transformation $T\in \Gamma (2)$. The Schwarz-Pick lemma givesas $\mathrm{Im}w\to \infty$. A nonidentity deck transformation has no interior fixed point, so it is either a hyperbolic Möbius transformation or a parabolic Möbius transformation. The hyperbolic case is conjugate to a dilation $w\mapsto aw$ with $a>0$, $aeq1$. Since $|d\log \mathrm{Im}w|\le d{s}_{\mathbb{H}}$, its displacement is at least $|\log a|>0$, contradicting this inequality.

If $T$ is the identity, compose $L$ with the Cayley transform between the half-plane and disk. Its periodicity lets the resulting bounded function descend to the punctured disc and extend by the Riemann removable singularity theorem. A nonconstant extension takes its central value inside the disc by the maximum modulus principle. The covering map then gives an extension of $f$; a constant lift gives a constant $f$.

In the parabolic case, its fixed point is a rational modular cusp. Indeed, a parabolic integral matrix of trace $\pm 2$ has a rational eigenvector for its repeated eigenvalue. Conjugate by an element of the modular group sending this cusp to infinity. The level-two subgroup is normal, so the conjugated transformation is $\zeta \mapsto \zeta +2n$ for a nonzero integer $n$. The conjugated lift $P$ consequently satisfiesThe modular transformations permute the three target cusp values $0,1,\infty$, as seen from the lambda transformation formulas below. It is therefore enough to examine $\lambda (P(w))$.

To fix the sign of $n$, the function $\mathrm{Im}P$ is periodic in the real direction. Its mean $M(y)={\int }_0^1\mathrm{Im}P(x+iy)dx$ satisfies $M^{\prime }(y)=2n$ by the Cauchy-Riemann equations and the increment of $\mathrm{Re}P$. Positivity for all $y>0$ forces $n>0$. The functionis well-defined, nonvanishing and bounded by one on the punctured disc, so it extends holomorphically to zero. Its winding number along a circle around the puncture is $n$, because a unit increment in $w$ increases $\pi iP$ by $2\pi in$. The argument principle therefore shows that $Q$ has a zero of order $n$ at the origin.

At the infinite cusp, the modular lambda function has the convergent expansion $\lambda (\zeta )=16q+O(q^2)$ in $q=e^{\pi i\zeta }$. Thus $\lambda (P(w))=16Q(z)+O(Q(z{)}^2)$ extends and tends to zero. Undoing the target permutation gives a removable singularity or a pole for $f$. In every case the puncture is not essential, which proves the holomorphic Great Picard theorem. For a meromorphic function with an essential singularity, if three spherical values occurred only finitely often, a Möbius transformation would make the omitted values $0,1,\infty$. The same proof applies because omission of infinity makes the transformed function holomorphic. Hence the meromorphic version has at most two exceptional spherical values.

By part (b), $M=S^n/\Gamma$, where the group of deck transformations acts freely by round isometries. Every round isometry is the restriction of an orthogonal transformation of ${\mathbb{R}}^{n+1}$: it preserves the inner product $⟨x,y⟩=\cos d(x,y)$, so its images of an orthonormal basis determine its linear extension.

Suppose $n$ is even. Every $A\in SO(n+1)$ has eigenvalue one. Indeed, the nonreal eigenvalues come in conjugate pairs with product one, while the remaining real eigenvalues are $\pm 1$. Their number is odd and their product is one, forcing at least one $+1$. Such a transformation fixes a unit vector. Freeness of the deck transformation action consequently implies that the determinant map $\Gamma \to \{\pm 1\}$ has trivial kernel. Thus $|\Gamma |\le 2$.

If $\Gamma$ is nontrivial with generator $A$, then $A^2=I$. Its eigenvalues are $\pm 1$, and freeness excludes the eigenvalue $+1$. Hence $A=-I$, the antipodal involution. We obtainThis proves the even-dimensional part of the classification of complete positive constant-curvature manifolds.

The conclusion fails in odd dimensions. For $n=2m-1\ge 3$, identify $S^{2m-1}$ with the unit sphere in ${\mathbb{C}}^m$. Scalar multiplication by $\zeta =e^{2\pi i/r}$, with $r\ge 3$, generates a freely acting cyclic group of isometries: ${\zeta }^{j}z=z$ for nonzero $z$ forces ${\zeta }^j=1$. The quotient is complete with constant sectional curvature one and has fundamental group $C_r$, so it is neither the simply connected sphere nor Real projective space with fundamental group $C_2$. In particular $S^3/C_3$ is a lens space counterexample.

Let $\Gamma ={\pi }_1(M)$. A compact connected smooth manifold has finite CW complex homotopy type, hence a finitely generated fundamental group. Its universal cover with the lifted Riemannian metric is complete by the lifted-geodesic argument in part 2(b) and has nonnegative Ricci curvature. The deck transformations act freely and properly discontinuously by isometries. Part (a) givesThe degree-one Hurewicz theorem identifies $H_1(M;\mathbb{Z})$ with the abelianization of $\Gamma$. This finitely generated abelian group has free rank $b=b_1(M)$, so there is a surjection $\Gamma \to {\mathbb{Z}}^b$. Choose lifts ${\gamma }_1,\dots ,{\gamma }_b$ of a basis and let $A\ge 1$ bound their word lengths. For every $(z_1,\dots ,z_b)$ with $\sum |z_i|\le m$, the product ${\gamma }_1^{z_1}\cdots {\gamma }_b^{z_b}$ has word length at most $Am$ and maps to that vector. Distinct vectors therefore give distinct group elements. The integer cube $|z_i|\le \lfloor m/b\rfloor$ shows, for $b>0$, thatfor some $c>0$ and all sufficiently large $m$. Comparing with the degree-$n$ upper bound forces $b\le n$; the case $b=0$ is immediate. ThusThis is the first Betti-number bound from polynomial fundamental-group growth.

The standard connectedness convention for a Riemannian manifold is needed here. If disconnected manifolds are allowed, the bound applies to each connected component; a disjoint union of two flat $n$-tori has first Betti number $2n$ and contradicts a global bound by $n$.

For a connected smooth Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ without boundary, let $I(M)$ be the group of all global diffeomorphisms $f$ with $f^{\ast }g=g$, endowed with its compact-open topology. Equivalently these maps preserve the intrinsic distance; the Myers-Steenrod theorem supplies smoothness of distance-preserving bijections and makes $I(M)$ a finite-dimensional Lie group acting smoothly. The group is metric-dependent: a topological manifold can carry a very symmetric metric or one with no continuous symmetries. Connectedness matters here. With infinitely many identical disconnected components, permutations of those components can produce a group which is not a finite-dimensional Lie group.

An isometry is determined by its value and derivative at one point. To prove this, suppose $f(p)=p$ and $d{f}_p=I$. Preservation of the Levi-Civita connection giveswhere the exponential map is defined locally. Thus $f$ is the identity in a normal neighborhood of $p$. The set where its value and derivative agree with the identity is both closed and, by the same argument, open. Connectedness makes it all of $M$. No completeness is needed for this determination argument.

The stabilizer $I(M{)}_p$ consequently acts faithfully and orthogonally on $T_{p}M$, so embeds in $O(n)$. More generally an isometry takes a chosen orthonormal frame at $p$ to one at its image point, providing an injective map into the orthonormal frame bundle. It is a smooth embedding, and the full isometry action is proper. The orbit-stabilizer dimension formula therefore givesIsotropy is compact. If $M$ is compact then $I(M)$ itself is compact, by the same frame description or Arzela-Ascoli applied to isometries and their inverses. Properness also means that the quotient by isometries has well-controlled local orbit structure, even though orbit dimensions may vary.

The infinitesimal equation is the Killing equation. Differentiating $f_t^{\ast }g=g$ at zero givesConversely a vector field satisfying this equation has local flows preserving the metric. A global one-parameter subgroup requires the field to be complete. On a geodesically complete manifold every Killing field is complete: its length is constant along each of its own trajectories, so a finite-time trajectory has bounded speed and stays in a closed bounded ball. The Hopf-Rinow theorem makes that ball compact, and the ordinary differential equation can then be continued. The caveat is real: on the Euclidean interval $(0,1)$, the field ${\partial }_x$ is Killing but its translations are not globally defined for all time. This illustrates Killing fields on incomplete manifolds need not generate global isometries.

The Killing transport identities determine a Killing field from $X(p)$ and the skew-adjoint map $(\nabla X{)}_p$. Along a geodesic the field is a Jacobi field, so uniqueness for its second-order differential equation propagates these initial data. They have $n+n(n-1)/2$ components, reproducing the dimension bound infinitesimally. The important distinction on an incomplete manifold is between all local Killing solutions and the Lie algebra of complete global isometry flows.

In dimension three the bound is six, and rotational isotropy gives stronger information. The Lie subalgebras of $\mathfrak{so}(3)$ have dimensions zero, one or three: identifying the bracket with the cross product, a two-plane is not closed under brackets. Suppose $\dim I(M)=5$. Since an orbit has dimension at most three, its stabilizer would have dimension at least two, and hence exactly three. Its connected isotropy acts as all of $SO(3)$ on the tangent space. But the orbit tangent space is invariant under that action and would have dimension $5-3=2$, impossible because the standard rotational representation is irreducible. Therefore dimension five cannot occur.

If the dimension is six, each orbit has dimension three and each stabilizer dimension three. All orbits are open, so connectedness makes the action transitive. At each point the isotropy is transitive on tangent two-planes, forcing sectional curvature to be independent of the plane; transitivity makes its value independent of the point. Thus a maximally symmetric connected three-manifold has constant sectional curvature. Homogeneous Riemannian manifolds are complete, so its simply connected cover is the round sphere, Euclidean space or hyperbolic space after normalization. Conversely these three simply connected metrics attain dimension six:Here $O^{+}(3,1)$ preserves the chosen sheet of the hyperboloid; it includes orientation-reversing hyperbolic isometries. Constant curvature alone does not imply that a quotient retains six-dimensional global symmetry.

Dimension four likewise forces transitivity: stabilizer dimension three would give a one-dimensional invariant orbit tangent space, again impossible for full rotational isotropy. The stabilizer thus has dimension one and the orbits are three-dimensional. Typical four-dimensional isometry groups occur for $S^2\times \mathbb{R}$ and ${\mathbb{H}}^2\times \mathbb{R}$, where the factor groups have dimensions three and one. The usual Nil metric has three translation symmetries and one rotational isotropy symmetry. In centred Heisenberg coordinates it iswhich exhibits the horizontal rotations. Its distinct vertical and horizontal Ricci eigenvalues bound continuous isotropy by that rotation group, so its full isometry dimension is four. Standard metrics on $\widetilde{S{L}_2(\mathbb{R})}$ and nonround Berger spheres also have dimension four. The standard Sol geometry has a three-dimensional translation group and only finite isotropy, giving dimension three. These examples show how a preferred vertical direction reduces rotational symmetry.

The isometry dimensions in dimension three are precisely $0,1,2,3,4,6$, all realizable. A compact hyperbolic three-manifold gives zero; the product of a circle and a closed hyperbolic surface gives one. For dimension two take $T^2\times (0,1)$ withIts scalar curvature is the constant $-14$, but its Ricci eigenvalues are the distinct constants $-3,-6,-5$ in the two horizontal directions and the vertical direction. Hence connected isotropy is trivial and possible isometries preserve these line distributions. A local isometry preserving them has $t^{\prime }=t+c$ and would require constant dilations $e^{-c}$ and $e^{-2c}$ of the two circle coordinates. A global circle diffeomorphism with such a constant dilation has degree $\pm 1$, forcing $c=0$. The identity component is therefore exactly the two circle translations. A flat three-torus gives dimension three; $S^2\times \mathbb{R}$ gives four; a simply connected constant-curvature model gives six. This construction distinguishes local homogeneity from the smaller global isometry group.

For quotients, let a complete simply connected Riemannian manifold $X$ cover $M=X/\Gamma$. Every isometry of $M$ lifts to an isometry of $X$ which normalizes the deck transformation group. Conversely, every normalizing isometry descends. Two lifts differ by a deck transformation, giving the isometry group of a Riemannian quotient formulaThus one should not replace the isometry group of a quotient by that of its model geometry. For a flat torus, for example,The second factor is finite, whereas translations give the three-dimensional identity component.

There is a useful curvature test for compact manifolds. Contracting and differentiating the Killing equation gives ${\nabla }^{\ast }\nabla X=\mathrm{Ric}(X)$, with the nonnegative rough-Laplacian convention. Integration yields the integrated Bochner identity for Killing fieldsIf Ricci curvature is negative definite, no nonzero Killing field exists. The compact isometry group then has dimension zero and is finite. This explains why closed hyperbolic manifolds have finite global symmetry, despite the six-dimensional isometry group of their universal cover. Compactness is essential to this conclusion.

For a compact flat Riemannian manifold, the same identity makes every Killing field parallel. Parallel fields are exactly the vectors fixed by linear holonomy. ThereforeApplied to the six flat types of Question 1, this gives dimensions three for the torus, one for each of the four nontrivial cyclic types, and zero for the Hantzsche-Wendt manifold. These are identity-component dimensions; disconnected finite symmetries can still be present. Local curvature symmetry, global deck-group constraints, and completeness thus play different roles in determining the isometry group.

Use the standard integral cohomology ring $H^{\ast }({\mathbb{CP}}^2)=\mathbb{Z}[u]/(u^3)$, $|u|=2$. Any self-homeomorphism $h$ sends $u$ to $u$ or $-u$, and hence sends $u^2$ to $u^2$. Its Lefschetz number is therefore $1\pm 1+1$, which is either $3$ or $1$. By the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem, every such homeomorphism has a fixed point.

Now ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$ is simply connected: its CW structure has no one-cells and only two- and four-cells. If it covered a connected space with degree $d\ge 2$, it would be the universal cover. The usual covering space hypotheses hold for the base because it is locally homeomorphic to this manifold. Its deck transformation group would act transitively on every fibre and have $d$ elements. A nonidentity deck transformation has no fixed point: uniqueness of lifts makes one fixing a point the identity everywhere on the connected cover. This contradicts the preceding calculation. ThusThus the complex projective plane has no nontrivial covering quotient.

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

The surface group of a closed oriented genus-two surface $Y$ has presentationSend $a_1\mapsto (12)$, $a_2\mapsto (123)$ and $b_1,b_2\mapsto 1$. The relation holds and the images generate $S_3$, giving a surjective group homomorphism. Its normal kernel defines a connected six-sheeted regular covering space $\tilde{Y}\to Y$, with deck transformation group $S_3$.

The covering surface is closed and inherits an orientation. Multiplicativity of the Euler characteristic gives $\chi (\tilde{Y})=6\chi (Y)=6(-2)=-12$, so $2-2g=-12$ and $\boxed{g=7}$. A nonidentity deck transformation of a connected cover fixes no point: if it fixed one, uniqueness of path lifts would force it to be the identity everywhere. Thus this supplies the requested free $S_3$ action. It is a case of finite groups act freely on suitable closed orientable surfaces.

Take a homotopy equivalence $f:X\to Y$ with inverse $g$, and universal covering maps $p_X,p_Y$. Since the covering spaces are simply connected, the path lifting theorem constructs lifts $\tilde{f}$ of $f{p}_X$ and $\tilde{g}$ of $g{p}_Y$, after specifying one value in the appropriate fiber. Explicitly, define the lift at a point by lifting the image of a path from the chosen base point; independence from the path follows from simple connectedness and homotopy lifting.

Lift a homotopy $gf\simeq 1_X$ starting at $\tilde{g}\tilde{f}$. The homotopy lifting theorem for a covering map makes its endpoint a map $d_X:\tilde{X}\to \tilde{X}$ with $p_X{d}_X=p_X$. Such a lift of the identity is a deck transformation and is a homeomorphism: lift the identity again with the base point image reversed, and uniqueness of path lifts makes the two compositions identities. Likewise $\tilde{f}\tilde{g}\simeq d_Y$ for a deck transformation of $\tilde{Y}$.

Thus both compositions are homotopy equivalences, even though the lifted homotopies need not end at the particular identity lift. Part (i) then provesKeeping the possible deck transformations is essential when the original homotopies do not fix base points.

Take a finite presentation $T=⟨x_1,\dots ,x_r\mid R_1,\dots ,R_s⟩$. For a closed-manifold realization of a finitely presented fundamental group, begin with a five-dimensional ball and attach $r$ one-handles, giving a compact oriented five-manifold $W_1$ with fundamental group the free group on the $x_i$. Represent the relators by disjoint embedded circles in its four-dimensional boundary. General position allows them to be embedded and disjoint, and their oriented normal bundles admit framings. Attach a two-handle along each such circle. The resulting compact five-manifold $W$ hasby the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Now set $B=\partial W$. It is a compact connected smooth four-manifold without boundary. Turning this handle decomposition upside down gives a relative handle decomposition of $(W,B)$ with handles of indices three, four and five only. Attaching such handles does not change the fundamental group: there are no new one-handles or two-handle relations. Thus ${\pi }_1(B)\to {\pi }_1(W)$ is an isomorphism andThese are the differential-topological handle facts used in the construction; the dimension-five thickening ensures the boundary retains the prescribed fundamental group.

Now assume $T$ finite. Choose any smooth Riemannian metric on $B$ and lift it to its universal cover $\tilde{B}$. This cover is compact, since its degree is $|T|$, and simply connected. Its deck transformations give a free isometric $T$-action. For the two Gassmann equivalent subgroups putEach is a closed Riemannian manifold, and $\tilde{B}$ is its simply connected universal cover, with deck transformation group $U_i$. Consequently ${\pi }_1(M_i)\cong U_i$.

Here is the complete spectral argument behind the Sunada theorem in this situation. Each finite-dimensional upstairs eigenspace $E_{\lambda }$ is a representation of $T$, because the action is isometric and commutes with the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Functions downstairs correspond exactly to invariant functions upstairs, so their multiplicities are $\dim E_{\lambda }^{U_i}$. Averaging the representation matrices over a subgroup is a projection onto its invariant subspace. Taking its trace givesThe character ${\chi }_{\lambda }$ is constant on each conjugacy class of $T$. Gassmann equivalence means $|U_1\cap C|=|U_2\cap C|$ for every such class $C$; summing these equalities also gives $|U_1|=|U_2|$. The two averages are therefore equal for every $\lambda$. The quotients are isospectral, with ${\pi }_1(M_i)\cong U_i$.

If $U_2=t{U}_1{t}^{-1}$, the map $[x{]}_{U_1}\mapsto [tx{]}_{U_2}$ is well defined, invertible and isometric because $t$ acts by an isometry upstairs. Conjugate subgroups give isometric quotients.

For an explicit example with different fundamental groups, use the order-sixteen Gassmann pairEmbed each in $T=S_{16}$ by left multiplication on its own sixteen elements, identified with the same sixteen-point set. These regular representations are faithful. Both groups have one identity element, three elements of order two, and twelve of order four: in $C_4^2$ the elements of order dividing two are precisely its four even-coordinate elements; in $Q_8\times C_2$ they are the four elements in $\{1,-1\}\times C_2$. Every remaining element has order four.

In a regular action, an order-$k$ element is a product of $16/k$ disjoint $k$-cycles. Thus each subgroup intersects the identity conjugacy class of $S_{16}$ in one element, the class of type $2^8$ in three, the class of type $4^4$ in twelve, and every other class in zero. They are Gassmann equivalent. However $H_1$ is abelian and $H_2$ is nonabelian, so they are not isomorphic. Apply the preceding construction with fundamental group $S_{16}$ and these subgroups. It producesIn particular they cannot even be homeomorphic, and therefore cannot be isometric.