Comet energy diffusion Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
Model successive uncorrelated planetary kicks as a random walk in inverse semi-major axis , proportional to negative specific orbital energy. If the root mean square kick per periapsis passage is and the initial value is , the characteristic number of passages to reach the escape scale is . For and passage interval ,
The quantity has inverse-length units, not the units of a variance-per-time diffusion coefficient. With , that coefficient is . This estimate assumes many independent encounters; changing orbital periods and resonant correlations can invalidate the clock. It is not an exact mean first-passage time.
Drifted Brownian first-passage density Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-11-05
For a positive level , this density describes the first-passage time of . The Girsanov theorem multiplies the zero-drift density by the stopped likelihood . Its total mass is one for nonnegative drift and for negative drift; the latter has remaining mass at infinite hitting time.
Let have integrable, mean-zero independent and identically distributed random variables as increments, taking integer values at most one, with . For a positive integer , put and , . Then is finite almost surely. Indeed, is a nonnegative martingale; finite convergence on would force its integer increments eventually to vanish, contrary to the Borel-Cantelli lemmas applied to .
The exponential martingale of a random walk stopped at is bounded by because and . The dominated convergence theorem therefore preserves its mean one at the limit and proves the displayed first-passage time transform. This argument accommodates arbitrarily large negative jumps; the restriction concerns upward jumps. For a simple symmetric random walk, , giving .
Suppose an integer-valued random walk starts at , has upward increments at most one, and satisfies almost surely. Write for its first-passage time to . On the event of almost sure convergence, the walk tends to and cannot jump over any positive integer, so every is finite. The bound gives . Along this subsequence, on each such sample path, proving the displayed reciprocal limit. No independence between the hitting times and the path is required. The strong law of large numbers supplies the hypothesis for integrable independent and identically distributed random variables as steps with positive mean.
First-passage time Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
The First-passage time to a target set is . It is also called a hitting time.
First-passage-time density Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-11-05
When a first-passage time has an absolutely continuous distribution, its density is , where is its survival function. In a continuous-time Markov chain, this density is the total Probability flux from surviving states into the absorbing set.
Infinitesimal generator (stochastic processes) Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-11-05
The Infinitesimal generator describes the instantaneous action of a Markov transition semigroup on functions of the state. For a strongly continuous semigroup on a specified Banach space of functions, its generator is
The domain and the limit topology are part of the definition; different function spaces can give different operator domains. Pointwise generator formulas are often computed first on smooth test functions.
For a continuous-time Markov chain with rates ,
For Brownian diffusion with variance , on smooth compactly supported functions. For a deterministic flow , the chain rule instead gives . These examples turn transition rules or local motion into an operator.
For suitable and integrability conditions, Dynkin's formula makes a martingale. Taking expectations yields evolution equations; stopping at a boundary gives equations such as for hitting probabilities and for mean first-passage times. The generator is useful because local drift, diffusion or jump rates encode global transition and boundary questions.
Linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-11-05
For , real and standard Brownian motion, the first-passage time to a linear boundary has
Here is the standard normal distribution function. Differentiation gives , the drifted Brownian first-passage density. Its Laplace transform is for . There is mass at infinity when ; for the hitting time is finite almost surely.
Model the polymerization Brownian ratchet by a rigid tip and a Brownian load. Let be the elementary load advance, its drag coefficient, and its diffusion coefficient. For a spherical load, , but no load radius is specified, so the rate is naturally expressed in terms of . Assume addition is effectively instantaneous once the gap reaches , and removal is negligible. The gap reflects at zero, first arrival at causes insertion, and insertion resets it to zero.
With no opposing force, the mean first-passage time satisfies , , . Integration gives . One advance per passage gives
The advance-event rate is , while is a length per time.
A constant resisting force produces drift . The diffusion-limited Brownian ratchet with constant load now satisfies
An integrating factor gives . Integrating again from to gives , where . Therefore
At weak load the ratio is ; at large load . Replacing the whole force dependence by would discard the first-passage kinetics of this regime.
For two staggered strands that alternately advance the leading tip by half a monomer, and . Two aligned strands, as schematically drawn, do not automatically have that half-step: an advance may be , with the other strand filling the same layer afterward. Use the same geometrical step in the passage problem and in converting event rate to velocity. The limiting formula assumes negligible removal, rigid tips, an overdamped load with constant drag, and fast insertion compared with . With appreciable removal or additional internal strand states, the renewal reset model must be replaced by a coupled gap/reaction process.
Subtract the boundary slope from the Brownian motion: . Then is the first-passage time of to the fixed level . The zero-drift Brownian reflection principle gives
Here is the standard normal distribution function. To change the drift to , use the Girsanov theorem on each finite horizon, with density . On , conditional expectation at the stopped time gives , because the density is a true martingale. Since , the drifted Brownian first-passage density is consequently
There may be additional mass at infinite hitting time; the displayed density only describes finite passage. With , apply the given zero-drift Brownian first-passage Laplace transform:
The zero-discount limit is for and for , so the hitting probability is less than one precisely when the line moves away with positive slope.
For a direct verification of the linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution, define
Both terms tend to zero as . Let be the standard normal density. The identity
follows by expanding the two squares. Differentiating the two normal probabilities then gives
Since this is the previously derived hitting density and both distribution functions start at zero,
This proof applies to every real , including the defective distribution when .
For the barrier digital put, use the dividend-free Black-Scholes model with constant interest rate and spot volatility . Under the risk-neutral measure,
Set and
Reaching the barrier is equivalent to reaching . The contingent claim pays one only on the survival event . Risk-neutral pricing therefore gives
This is a path-survival price, not the price of a terminal digital put option. Continuity of the stock paths and the absence of an atom in the finite-horizon maximum imply that alternative touching conventions change no price. As , the value tends to ; as , it tends to zero. Both checks agree with the survival interpretation.
Translate the horizontal coordinate by . Then is a standard Brownian motion starting at zero, and continuity identifies with its first-passage time to . The vertical coordinate remains an independent standard Brownian motion starting at zero. Part (a) therefore gives the Cauchy exit law from a Brownian half-plane:
The TeX transcription's initial value and later are both corrected here to the PDF's and .
Write for the comet's inverse semi-major axis. Its specific orbital energy is , so escape corresponds to . The printed quantity
has dimensions of inverse length. It cannot, literally, be a standard variance-per-time diffusion coefficient. Interpret it as the characteristic root mean square step in per periapsis passage, as in a discrete comet energy diffusion model.
If successive kicks are unbiased and uncorrelated, after passages the root mean square displacement is . Starting at gives , hence . Taking the characteristic interval to be the initial orbital period gives
Here . In particular, for this is . Without specifying the initial semi-major axis and the time per statistically independent encounter, the PDF cannot determine a unique time.
With the convention , the actual diffusion coefficient would be . The estimate requires , orbit crossing, and sufficient phase decorrelation. Near escape the orbital period grows, and resonant or secular correlations invalidate the simple constant-step clock. This is a characteristic diffusion scale, not an exact mean first-passage time: even an unbiased Brownian motion on an unbounded half-line has an infinite mean time to reach its absorbing endpoint.
For , the Brownian reflection principle at the first-passage time of gives the Brownian running maximum identity
where is the distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Indeed, reflection pairs paths that have reached and end below with paths ending above ; has no atom at .
As , this probability tends to one. The events increase with integer , so with probability one the path reaches in finite time. Taking a countable intersection over positive integer gives
Here . This also proves that every positive-level Brownian first-passage time is finite almost surely.
Put and . The Markov property and the state-independent transition probabilities show that, conditional on the whole previous history, is with probability and with probability . Multiplying these conditional probabilities for any finite step sequence proves that the are independent and identically distributed random variables, with
Because , the strong law of large numbers gives
In particular, almost surely. This stronger pathwise consequence will determine both eventual crossings and the asymptotic first-passage times.
At the empty Markov chain state, only the constant-rate production chemical reaction is possible. Thus the first-passage time has an exponential distribution of rate :
Its expected value can be obtained by integrating this survival function, and its second moment by integrating times the survival function:
Consequently the requested expected value and variance are
Remaining useful life 2026-11-05
Remaining useful life is the future time, cycle count or other usage until a component reaches a specified end-of-life criterion, conditional on its current condition and assumed future operation. The endpoint must be stated: crossing a performance limit, exhausting a discharge and reaching a long-term degradation threshold are different events. For an increasing damage variable , threshold and present time , a mathematical definition is the first-passage time
A prediction of this quantity supports condition-based maintenance, while requiring more than detection of existing damage.
For an illustrative deterministic model, let current normalized damage be0.60, the end threshold1.00 and future damage rate0.02 per hour. Linear extrapolation gives . If the plausible future rate instead ranges from0.015 to0.025 per hour, the corresponding times range from about26.67 down to16h. Remaining useful life uncertainty therefore includes future operating conditions and degradation-model uncertainty, as well as measurement error.
A primary NASA battery-aging dataset makes the endpoint concrete. A custom testbed cycled electric batteries under controlled load and temperature, recording quantities including electric potential difference, electric current and temperature. The reported aging endpoint was30% loss of rated capacity, from2Ah to1.4Ah. That long-term endpoint is distinct from the terminal-potential threshold used to end an individual discharge.[ref]
A useful validation compares predictions made before the endpoint with subsequently observed crossing times under documented operation. Reporting one predicted number without its endpoint, usage assumptions or uncertainty can conceal the main sources of disagreement between a model and a real endurance test.
Survival probability Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-11-05
For a nonnegative first-passage time , possibly infinite, the survival probability is
It describes the Probability that absorption has not yet occurred. The tail-integral identity
holds as an identity of extended nonnegative quantities, even when absorption is not almost sure or the expected time is infinite. Indeed, pathwise, and Tonelli's theorem exchanges expectation and integration. For an integer-valued hitting time, the corresponding formula is .
If the finite-time distribution is absolutely continuous, its first-passage-time density is . Where , its hazard function is . Constant hazard gives and mean .
The limit of as is the Probability of never being absorbed; a positive limit forces infinite mean. Conversely, zero limit does not guarantee a finite mean. Brownian first passage to a positive level occurs almost surely, but its survival tail is proportional to , whose integral diverges.
Waiting-time distribution Created 2026-10-25 Updated 2026-11-05
A waiting-time distribution is the probability distribution of a nonnegative random duration until a specified event. It can be discrete, absolutely continuous, or mixed. Its survival function is and its cumulative distribution function is .
If the finite-time law is absolutely continuous, the probability density function is almost everywhere. Mere continuity of the cumulative distribution function is insufficient for this density representation. At times with positive survival, the hazard function is ; it measures the instantaneous event rate conditional on having waited that long.
Constant hazard with gives , the exponential distribution. Waiting a discrete number of independent Bernoulli trials instead gives a geometric distribution. A fixed deterministic wait has a point mass at its prescribed duration rather than an ordinary density.