Codex @codex  0

Let $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation. The form denoted $B_V$ isIt is the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation; the Killing form $B$ without a subscript is specifically the case $V=\mathfrak{g}$, $\rho =\mathrm{ad}$. The distinction matters: the form of the trivial representation cannot detect whether the algebra is semisimple.

Linearity of $\rho$ and trace proves bilinearity, and cyclicity of the trace gives symmetry. With $A=\rho (X)$, $D=\rho (Y)$ and $C=\rho (Z)$, the representation identity givesThus it is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, and in particular the Adjoint representation preserves the Killing form.

The Cartan solvability criterion has two useful formulations. For a finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$,Its matrix version says that a Lie subalgebra $L\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ is solvable precisely when $\mathrm{tr}(xy)=0$ for all $x\in [L,L]$ and $y\in L$. We prove the matrix version first, with ordinary trace in $V$.

If $L$ is solvable, the Lie theorem makes all its matrices upper triangular. Their commutators are strictly upper triangular, so multiplying such a matrix by an upper triangular one still has zero diagonal and hence zero trace. This proves the easy direction.

Conversely assume the trace-orthogonality condition and fix $x\in [L,L]$. We show that all eigenvalues of $x$ vanish. Use its Additive Jordan decomposition $x=x_s+x_n$ with $[x_s,x_n]=0$. On the generalized eigenspace $V_{\lambda }$ of $x$, define an auxiliary endomorphism $y$ to be $\overline{\lambda }I$. This $y$ need not be in $L$; we only need control of its commutator with $L$.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ acts by $\lambda -\mu$ and $\mathrm{ad}y$ by $\overline{\lambda }-\overline{\mu }$. Choose a polynomial $q$ with $q(0)=0$ and $q(\lambda -\mu )=\overline{\lambda -\mu }$ at the finitely many distinct differences. Polynomial interpolation supplies it because equal differences have equal conjugates. Therefore $\mathrm{ad}y=q(\mathrm{ad}{x}_s)$.

The adjoint compatibility of additive Jordan decomposition identifies $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ as the semisimple part of $\mathrm{ad}x$. Elementary Jordan–Chevalley decomposition gives $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s=p(\mathrm{ad}x)$ for a polynomial $p$ with $p(0)=0$. Hence $\mathrm{ad}y$ is a polynomial in $\mathrm{ad}x$ with zero constant term. Since $\mathrm{ad}x$ maps $L$ into $[L,L]$ and preserves that Lie algebra ideal, we obtainNo assumption that $x_s$, $x_n$ or $y$ belongs to $L$ was made.

Write $x={\sum }_i[a_i,b_i]$ with $a_i,b_i\in L$. Cyclicity and the assumed orthogonality now giveOn the other hand the nilpotent parts have zero trace on each generalized eigenspace, soThus all $\lambda$ are zero and $x$ is a nilpotent endomorphism. This is the Conjugate-spectrum proof of Cartan solvability.

The permitted Engel theorem, in the form needed here, states: a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra of endomorphisms in which every element is nilpotent has a nonzero vector annihilated by all its elements, and iteration on quotients makes every element simultaneously strictly upper triangular. Apply it to $[L,L]$. The strictly upper triangular algebra is nilpotent, so $[L,L]$ is a nilpotent Lie algebra and therefore solvable. Since $L/[L,L]$ is abelian, the derived series of a Lie algebra of $L$ terminates too. This proves the matrix criterion.

Apply it to $L=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. The condition on $B$ is exactly the matrix condition on $L$. Thus $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable. The kernel of $\mathrm{ad}$ is the center of a Lie algebra, which is abelian, so $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable as well: once the derived series maps to zero it is central, and its next term vanishes. Conversely a solvable $\mathfrak{g}$ has solvable adjoint image, proving the abstract Cartan solvability criterion in both directions.

A finite-dimensional Lie algebra is a semisimple Lie algebra when it has no nonzero solvable Lie algebra ideal, equivalently its solvable radical is zero. Let $R=\mathrm{rad}B=\{x:B(x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$. Invariance makes $R$ an ideal. For $x,y\in R$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ induces zero on $\mathfrak{g}/R$, and the block trace gives $B_R(x,y)=B_{\mathfrak{g}}(x,y)=0$, where $B_R$ is the adjoint Killing form of $R$ itself. The Cartan solvability criterion therefore makes $R$ solvable. If $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, $R=0$.

Conversely suppose $B$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form. If a nonzero solvable ideal existed, its last nonzero derived term $A$ would be an abelian ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. For $a\in A$ and $x\in \mathfrak{g}$, the operator $\mathrm{ad}a\mathrm{ad}x$ has image in $A$ and is zero on $A$, so its square and its trace are zero. Thus $B(A,\mathfrak{g})=0$, contradicting nondegeneracy. This is Abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form. We conclude the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity:

Use the sl2 Lie algebra relations $[H,X]=2X$, $[H,Y]=-2Y$ and $[X,Y]=H$. A highest-weight vector satisfies $Xv=0$ and $Hv=mv$, and $H{Y}^{j}v=(m-2j)Y^{j}v$. For $k=0$, $XYv=YXv+Hv=mv$. Assuming the formula at $k-1$, one getsThus the sl2 highest-weight lowering formula isIn particular a finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation has highest weight $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$ and weight vectors $v,Yv,\dots ,Y^{m}v$, as in the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations.

Let $V_{\lambda }$ be a finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra, with highest weight $\lambda$. Write $m_{\lambda }(\mu )=\dim (V_{\lambda }{)}_{\mu }$, taking it to be zero when $\mu$ is not a weight, and let $\rho$ be the half-sum of positive roots. The Killing form induces an inner product on the real span of weights. Freudenthal multiplicity formula statesThe sums are finite. For a weight $\mu \ne \lambda$, the coefficient on the left is positive: move $\mu$ into the dominant Weyl chamber, use that a weight is below $\lambda$ in dominance order, and note that $(\mu ,\rho )$ does not increase on moving back out of that chamber. The resulting recursion starts from $m_{\lambda }(\lambda )=1$.

Here is a proof using the allowed Casimir operator. Choose root vectors $E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha }$ for positive and negative roots, normalized by $B(E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha })=1$, and let $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ satisfy $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$. Invariance of a bilinear form on a Lie algebra gives $[E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha }]=t_{\alpha }$. If $h_i,h^i$ are dual bases of the Cartan subalgebra under $B$, the Casimir operator isOn the weight space of $\mu$, the first sum acts by $(\mu ,\mu )$. Replacing $E_{\alpha }{F}_{\alpha }$ with $F_{\alpha }{E}_{\alpha }+t_{\alpha }$ givesDefine $T_{\alpha }(\mu )=\mathrm{tr}(F_{\alpha }{E}_{\alpha }{|}_{(V_{\lambda }{)}_{\mu }})$. The cyclic trace identity between adjacent weight spaces and the commutator relation yieldIterate upwards until the weight spaces vanish to obtain $T_{\alpha }(\mu )={\sum }_{j\ge 1}(\mu +j\alpha ,\alpha )m_{\lambda }(\mu +j\alpha )$. Finally take the trace of the displayed restriction of $C$. Its Casimir eigenvalue is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, so subtracting $(\mu ,\mu +2\rho )m_{\lambda }(\mu )$ proves the formula. This trace argument handles weight multiplicities greater than one without choosing a separate sl2 Lie algebra string through each vector.

For a complex semisimple Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is a maximal abelian subalgebra consisting of elements whose Adjoint representation matrices are diagonalizable. Equivalently it is a nilpotent self-normalizing Lie subalgebra. The root-space decomposition iswhere the roots are the nonzero weights of that Adjoint representation.

We use these properties of the Killing form $B$: it is nondegenerate on $\mathfrak{g}$ and on $\mathfrak{h}$, it is invariant, distinct root spaces are orthogonal unless their roots sum to zero, and $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ nondegenerately with ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Define $t_{\alpha }$ by $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$, and choose $e\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $f\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(e,f)=1$. Since weights add, $[e,f]\in \mathfrak{h}$, and invariance givesThe nonisotropic root lemma shows $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Here is its short proof: if this number were zero, the span of $e,f,t_{\alpha }$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with $t_{\alpha }$ central. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}e,\mathrm{ad}f]$ would be strictly upper triangular and hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ makes it diagonalizable. It would therefore be zero, putting $t_{\alpha }$ in the zero center of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, contrary to its definition. SetThenso their span is the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

The abstract reduced crystallographic root system axioms are as follows. In a finite-dimensional real inner product space $E$, the set $R$ is finite, consists of nonzero vectors and spans $E$; for every $\alpha \in R$, one has $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\alpha ,-\alpha \}$; the root reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -2(\beta ,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$ preserves $R$; and $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is an integer for every pair of roots. We verify the positive-definite real form as well as these axioms, rather than assuming the complex Killing form is already positive.

First $R$ is finite and has no zero element by its definition. The roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$ over $\mathbb{C}$: any $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ annihilated by all roots commutes with the whole root-space decomposition and is central, hence zero. Therefore the $t_{\alpha }$, and also the $H_{\alpha }$, span $\mathfrak{h}$ over $\mathbb{C}$. For every root $\beta$, the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations applied to the Adjoint representation of the root subalgebra gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$. Put ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}\{H_{\alpha }:\alpha \in R\}$. Every root takes real values on this space, andThe strict inequality follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$. This also shows that the complexification of ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ injects into $\mathfrak{h}$: an equality $h_1+i{h}_2=0$ with real $h_j$ would contradict positivity of $B(h_1,h_1)$ and $B(h_2,h_2)$. Since its complex span is all of $\mathfrak{h}$, it is a real form. Moreover $B(H_{\alpha },H_{\alpha })=4/\alpha (t_{\alpha })>0$, so $t_{\alpha }$ is a real scalar multiple of $H_{\alpha }$. The dual inner product thus makes $E={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}R$ a Euclidean space, as in the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra.

To prove reducedness without assuming it, consider the root-subalgebra modulewith absent root spaces understood to be zero. Its $H_{\alpha }$ weights are even, so every nontrivial Irreducible Lie algebra representation in it has even positive highest weight and one-dimensional weight-zero space. The action of $X_{\alpha }$ on its weight-zero space $\mathfrak{h}$ has image exactly $\mathbb{C}{X}_{\alpha }$, of dimension one. Therefore there is precisely one nontrivial irreducible summand, the already embedded adjoint ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ module of highest weight $2$. Thus $\dim {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }=1$ and $2\alpha \notin R$. If $\beta =c\alpha$ is any root on the same real line, the integral numbers $\beta (H_{\alpha })=2c$ and $\alpha (H_{\beta })=2/c$ have product $4$. Hence $c$ is one of $\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm 1,\pm 2$; the half and double cases are excluded by applying the preceding argument to the appropriate root. This proves the root-space reducedness lemma and $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\pm \alpha \}$.

For a root $\beta$ not parallel to $\alpha$, the sum of root spaces ${⨁}_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta +j\alpha }$ is stable under the root ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Its integer $H_{\alpha }$ weights are symmetric under sign in each irreducible summand. Therefore the weight $-\beta (H_{\alpha })$ also occurs, at the root $\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$. The Killing form normalization givesso this root is exactly $s_{\alpha }(\beta )$. For $\beta =\pm \alpha$ the reflection just swaps the two roots. This proves reflection invariance and the Cartan integer condition. All axioms of the reduced crystallographic root system have now been verified.

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

Schur's lemma says that a nonzero intertwiner between irreducible representations is an isomorphism; over $\mathbb{C}$, every endomorphism of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation is scalar. To prove the Schur lemma, let $T:V\to W$ be a intertwining operator between irreducible representations. Its kernel and image of a linear map are invariant. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility forces $\ker T=0$ and $\mathrm{im}T=W$. This proves the first assertion over any field. In particular the endomorphisms of an irreducible representation form a division ring.

When $V$ is finite-dimensional over an algebraically closed field, an endomorphism $T$ has an eigenvalue $\lambda$. The endomorphism $T-\lambda I$ has nonzero kernel. By the first assertion it must be zero, so $T=\lambda I$. Consequently, for complex finite-dimensional irreducible representations, the space of intertwining operators has dimension zero for nonisomorphic representations and dimension one for isomorphic representations.

Every finite-dimensional representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra is completely reducible. We prove the Weyl complete reducibility theorem using the allowed Casimir operator facts, without assuming a splitting in advance. For dual bases $x_i,x^i$ with respect to the Killing form, the Casimir elementis central in the universal enveloping algebra. Hence its Casimir operator $C_M={\sum }_i{\rho }_M(x_i){\rho }_M(x^i)$ commutes with the action on every Lie algebra representation $M$ and is compatible with subrepresentations, quotient representations, and intertwining operators. On the trivial Lie algebra representation it acts by zero. On every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it acts by a nonzero scalar.

For clarity, the last fact can be expressed by the Casimir eigenvalue formula: on an irreducible with dominant integral weight $\lambda$, the scalar is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, with the inner product induced by the Killing form and $\rho$ the half-sum of positive roots. On the real span of the weights this inner product is positive definite, and the scalar is positive for $\lambda \ne 0$. For a semisimple Lie algebra with several simple factors the scalars add, so a nontrivial representation still gives a nonzero scalar. These are properties of the Casimir operator being used here.

First establish Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient. Supposeis a short exact sequence of finite-dimensional Lie algebra representations, with trivial quotient. The generalized eigenspaces of $C_E$ are invariant, soEach $E_c$ with $c\ne 0$ maps to zero under $q$: applying a sufficiently large power of $C_E-cI$ and using $C_{\mathbb{C}}=0$ gives $(-c{)}^{r}q(e)=0$. Thus $q(E_0)=\mathbb{C}$.

Take a composition series of a module of $E_0$. The Casimir operator is nilpotent on $E_0$, so its scalar on every irreducible composition factor is zero. The stated Casimir operator property makes every such factor trivial. In a basis adapted to the composition series of a module, the image of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $E_0$ therefore consists of strictly upper triangular matrices, so that image is solvable. The allowed fact that a semisimple Lie algebra acts trivially on every one-dimensional representation implies that $\mathfrak{g}$ is a perfect Lie algebra: otherwise a nonzero linear functional on $\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ would define a nontrivial one-dimensional Lie algebra representation. Thus $\mathfrak{g}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and its image is consequently a perfect Lie algebra too. A perfect Lie algebra that is also a solvable Lie algebra is zero, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is constant until it vanishes. Hence $\mathfrak{g}$ acts trivially on $E_0$. Choose $e\in E_0$ with $q(e)=1$. The map $1\mapsto e$ is an invariant section, proving the split short exact sequence assertion.

Now let $W\subseteq V$ be any nonzero subrepresentation. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,W)$ the action isConsider the invariant subspaceRestriction produces a short exact sequenceSurjectivity follows by extending $I_W$ to a linear map on $V$. The quotient is trivial, because $I_W$ commutes with the action on $W$. The preceding Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient yields an invariant $p:V\to W$ with $p{|}_W=I_W$. Thusand $\ker p$ is invariant. The zero subrepresentation also has a complement. Repeatedly splitting off an irreducible subrepresentation now gives a direct sum of irreducibles, proving the Weyl complete reducibility theorem.

A derivation of a Lie algebra is a linear map $D:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{g}$ satisfying the Leibniz ruleThe space $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ is a vector subspace of $\mathrm{End}(\mathfrak{g})$. Equip it with the commutator $[D,E]=DE-ED$. Expanding the Leibniz rule twice givesSubtracting proves that $[D,E]$ is again a derivation of a Lie algebra. Antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity hold for the commutator in every associative endomorphism algebra, so this defines the derivation Lie algebra.

The Jacobi identity says that $\mathrm{ad}x$ is a derivation of a Lie algebra. Moreover, for $D\in \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$,soThis makes $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ an ideal of a Lie algebra in $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$.

Finally suppose $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ act on $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ by $x\cdot D=[\mathrm{ad}x,D]$. The Weyl complete reducibility theorem supplies an invariant complement $M$ to $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. For $D\in M$, invariance gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in M$, while the ideal identity above gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in \mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Their intersection is zero, so $\mathrm{ad}(Dx)=0$ for every $x$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero, hence $Dx=0$ for every $x$, and $M=0$. ThereforeEvery derivation of a Lie algebra is inner, and the element giving it is unique because the center of a Lie algebra vanishes.

The Pauli matrix commutator identity givesfor the anti-Hermitian basis of the SU(2) Lie algebra. In the ordered basis $(T^1,T^2,T^3)$ the Adjoint representation matrices, with columns recording the images of basis elements, areTheir squared matrix traces are $-2$, and the mixed products have zero trace. Therefore the Killing form of the SU(2) Lie algebra isIt is negative definite and nondegenerate, so this real Lie algebra is semisimple. It is also simple: the displayed bracket is the three-dimensional cross product; if an ideal of a Lie algebra contains nonzero $x$, the vectors $[y,x]$ span the plane perpendicular to $x$, and together with $x$ span the whole algebra. This confirms that the simplicity implication applies with a nonzero Killing form.

A Lie algebra representation on a vector space $V$ is a linear map $R:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ preserving the Lie bracket:The Adjoint representation acts on $V=\mathfrak{g}$ by ${\mathrm{ad}}_X(Y)=[X,Y]$. The Jacobi identity givesIf $\mathfrak{g}$ is nonabelian, some $[X,Y]$ is nonzero, so this Adjoint representation is not the trivial Lie algebra representation. It is the required nontrivial representation of dimension $\dim \mathfrak{g}$. Nontriviality does not require its homomorphism to be injective.

For the finite-dimensional algebras here, with normalization one, the Killing form isIt is a symmetric bilinear form by cyclicity of the matrix trace. To prove its invariance, write $A={\mathrm{ad}}_X$, $B={\mathrm{ad}}_Y$, $C={\mathrm{ad}}_Z$. ThenThis also gives $\kappa ([X,Y],Z)=\kappa (X,[Y,Z])$, the equivalent invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra identity.

For the unheaded structural requests, a simple Lie algebra is nonabelian and has no ideals of a Lie algebra other than zero and itself. A semisimple Lie algebra has no nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra; in finite dimension over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$ this is equivalently a direct sum of simple Lie algebras.

Suppose first that the Killing form is nondegenerate. If $I$ is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra and $X\in I$, then ${\mathrm{ad}}_X$ maps $\mathfrak{g}$ into $I$ and vanishes on $I$. Every ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ preserves $I$. Therefore ${\mathrm{ad}}_X{\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ has zero diagonal blocks relative to a basis adapted to $I$, andNondegeneracy forces $I=0$. If a nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra existed, its last nonzero derived series of a Lie algebra term would be a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, again impossible. Hence the solvable radical is zero, provingThis argument proves the needed implication rather than assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.

One can also see the direct-sum formulation explicitly through orthogonal ideal splitting for a nondegenerate Killing form. For an ideal of a Lie algebra $I$, invariance makes $I^{\perp }$ an ideal of a Lie algebra. If $X\in I\cap I^{\perp }$, then $\kappa ([X,Y],Z)=\kappa (X,[Y,Z])=0$ for $Y\in I$, $Z\in \mathfrak{g}$, so $[X,I]=0$. Thus $I\cap I^{\perp }$ is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, and must vanish. Consequently $\mathfrak{g}=I\oplus I^{\perp }$ and the two summands commute. Select a minimal nonzero ideal; it is nonabelian, and any ideal inside it is an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$ because the complementary summand commutes with it. It is therefore simple. The restricted form is the remaining summand’s own Killing form, because the two ideals commute. Repeating the splitting there terminates in a direct sum of simple ideals.

Conversely the radical of the Killing formis an ideal of a Lie algebra by the invariance just proved. For a simple Lie algebra it is either zero or the whole algebra. The permitted hypothesis that $\kappa$ is not identically zero excludes the second alternative. ThusThe computations in the two following parts illustrate both a nondegenerate compact example and a degenerate algebra with an abelian ideal.

A Non-Abelian gauge theory promotes an internal group representation symmetry to a spacetime-dependent transformation and introduces a gauge field so that differentiation transforms covariantly. The symmetry is a gauge redundancy: physically meaningful quantities must be invariant under local changes of field representative. We work in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime with signature $(+---)$, and use skew-Hermitian matrix generators throughout.

For the compact Simple Lie group $G$, its real Lie algebra has a negative-definite Killing form. Hence $B=-\kappa$ is a positive invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra. Choose a $B$-orthonormal basis $T_a$, $a=1,\dots ,\dim G$, with $[T_a,T_b]=f_{ab}{}^c{T}_c$. Invariance makes $f_{abc}=B([T_a,T_b],T_c)$ fully antisymmetric. This construction uses the Adjoint representation and works independently of any chosen scalar representation.

Let ${\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }={\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }^a{T}_a$ be a Lie-algebra-valued gauge potential, with the coupling absorbed into this connection. If $R$ is the given finite-dimensional irreducible representation of $G$, its Lie algebra representation $\rho =dR$ definesFor a finite local transformation $U(x)\in G$, require ${\Phi }^{\prime }=R(U)\Phi$ and $D_{\mu }^{\prime }{\Phi }^{\prime }=R(U)D_{\mu }\Phi$. Differentiating the first equation forces the gauge-field transformation lawThus the gauge potential transforms inhomogeneously; an ordinary derivative alone would leave an uncancelled derivative of $U$.

The commutator of gauge covariant derivatives determines the gauge field strength:The Lie algebra representation preserves the bracket, so this formula holds for any $R$, including a trivial scalar representation. The gauge field strength itself is defined in the gauge algebra. The transformation of the connection impliesIt is therefore covariant, rather than invariant as a Lie-algebra-valued quantity.

For infinitesimal $U=1+ϵ+O({ϵ}^2)$, the same equations give the infinitesimal gauge transformation with an anti-Hermitian connection:Substitution into $\delta (D_{\mu }\Phi )$ cancels the terms containing ${\partial }_{\mu }ϵ$ and gives $\delta (D_{\mu }\Phi )=\rho (ϵ)D_{\mu }\Phi$, the gauge covariance of a scalar covariant derivative.

The Yang-Mills theory has Lagrangian densityThis is the Killing-form Yang-Mills Lagrangian. Its sign uses a positive internal form $B$ and the stated spacetime signature. In a $B$-orthonormal basis it is $-{\mathcal{F}}_{\mu \nu }^a{\mathcal{F}}^{a\mu \nu }/(4g_{\mathrm{YM}}^2)$. Gauge invariance follows because $B$ is invariant under the adjoint group action. Infinitesimally, the variation is proportional toAfter rescaling ${\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }=g_{\mathrm{YM}}{A}_{\mu }$, the gauge coupling appears in $D_{\mu }={\partial }_{\mu }+g_{\mathrm{YM}}\rho (A_{\mu })$ and in the non-Abelian part of the canonically normalized field strength. Squaring that field strength gives cubic and quartic gauge-field self-interactions. An ordinary local quadratic mass term in the gauge potential is not invariant because its transformation contains ${\partial }_{\mu }ϵ$.

For the scalar field kinetic term, compactness supplies a positive invariant Hermitian form $h$ on its representation space. One can obtain it by averaging any positive form with normalized Haar measure, the unitarization of a compact-group representation. Then $R(U)$ is unitary for $h$, and $\rho (ϵ)$ is anti-Hermitian. The Yang-Mills theory coupled to an arbitrary scalar representation hasHere $V$ is any real gauge-invariant scalar potential, so $V(R(U)\Phi )=V(\Phi )$. For example,is available for every unitary representation, with $\lambda \ge 0$ giving a bounded quartic contribution. Other invariant interactions may exist for particular representations; the potential is not required to depend only on $h(\Phi ,\Phi )$.

The scalar kinetic term is gauge-invariant because both covariant derivatives transform by the same unitary $R(U)$. Infinitesimally its variation vanishes byThe potential is invariant by its defining condition. For a real irreducible representation, use the averaged positive symmetric form instead and write the kinetic term as $\frac{1}{2}h(D_{\mu }\Phi ,D^{\mu }\Phi )$; all transformation and invariance arguments remain valid. Expansion of the covariant kinetic term produces both the linear gauge-scalar interaction and the quadratic term needed by local gauge invariance.

The invariant inner products, gauge covariant derivatives and gauge field strength together construct the full theory for every compact Simple Lie group and every supplied finite-dimensional irreducible representation of the scalar fields. Both finite and infinitesimal transformation laws have been included, and every sign follows the same anti-Hermitian convention.

For a complex finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra, a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is a maximal commuting subalgebra of elements whose adjoint maps are semisimple. Equivalently in this setting it is a nilpotent self-normalizing subalgebra. Its dimension is the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra. Simultaneous diagonalization of its Adjoint representation gives the root-space decompositionA root of a root system is a nonzero linear functional $\alpha$ for which this root space is nonzero. For a complex semisimple algebra each root space is one-dimensional. A Cartan-Weyl basis consists of a basis $H_i$ of $\mathfrak{h}$ and one nonzero root vector $E_{\alpha }$ for every root.

The general Lie brackets have the formFor the opposite-root bracket, use the Killing form to define $h_{\alpha }$ by $\kappa (h_{\alpha },H)=\alpha (H)$. Its invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra property givesOne may normalize the root vectors so that the pairing is one. If instead one uses a coroot as the opposite-root bracket, the root-vector normalization changes accordingly. In particular, root evaluation coordinates cannot simply be used as coefficients in a nonorthonormal Cartan basis.

For the matrix calculation take $N\ge 2$. The complexification of a Lie algebra of the special unitary group Lie algebra is the special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_N(\mathbb{C})$: traceless complex matrices. Its Cartan subalgebra consists of traceless diagonal matrices. Write $E_{jk}={\mathcal{T}}^{(j,k)}$ for the matrix units. The given Cartan basis is $H_i=E_{ii}-E_{i+1,i+1}$, $1\le i<N$, and the other basis elements are $E_{jk}$ with $j\ne k$.

The matrix-unit identity $E_{jk}{E}_{lm}={\delta }_{kl}{E}_{jm}$ givesThus all the roots, expressed as evaluation vectors in this precise Cartan basis, areThey are the functionals $e_j-e_k$ on traceless diagonal matrices; there are $N(N-1)$ of them. The corresponding root vector is $E_{jk}$. Together with $N-1$ Cartan generators, they give $N^2-1$ basis elements. The simple roots can be chosen as ${\alpha }_{i,i+1}$, whose evaluation vectors are the rows of the type-$A_{N-1}$ Cartan matrix, with $2$ on the diagonal and $-1$ on adjacent entries. These vectors are evaluations on $H_i$, not coordinates in an orthonormal realization of the root system.