Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 35A iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The first law of thermodynamics isso, regarding as a function of ,Equality of mixed partial derivatives gives the thermodynamic derivation of blackbody radiation pressureWriting , we have , and henceEquivalently, , soThe condition as forces . Therefore the radiation pressure is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 316 2 vii Solution 2026-09-28
The same absorption and re-emission that produce radial radiation pressure also produce Poynting–Robertson drag. This velocity-dependent force removes specific orbital energy and angular momentum, destroys the exact Jacobi constant, and turns the formal equilibrium points into slowly drifting configurations. Stellar-wind drag can provide a similar correction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 347 1 b Solution 2026-09-29
Use cylindrical coordinates , put , and write the purely azimuthal velocity as . The steady radial, azimuthal, and vertical momentum equations areThus , where the effective gravity in a rotating frame isWhen radiation pressure supplies the pressure support, force balance gives
On the upper conical surface , the tangent and outward normal areBecause a pressure surface is an equipotential surface, . Since , this fixesThe lower face gives the reflected result. One face has area element . Adding both faces and using yieldsConsequentlyFor a broad radial range, each logarithmic interval can radiate an Eddington-scale contribution because rotation reduces the surface-normal gravity. The factor makes a thin wedge faint and lets a geometrically thick funnel expose a larger effective gravity and emitting area.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 347 2 b Solution 2026-09-28
The standard Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk has three qualitative radial zones. Its hot inner part is dominated by radiation pressure and electron-scattering opacity; farther out, gas pressure overtakes radiation pressure while electron scattering can remain the main opacity; in the cool outer zone, gas pressure remains dominant and free-free opacity becomes important. The transition radii vary with , , and .
For the inner zone, hold the surface density fixed during a local thermal perturbation. Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium givesso . The alpha disk prescription then yieldswhereas optically thick radiative diffusion with nearly constant electron-scattering opacity givesAt equilibrium . For net cooling ,Thus the total-pressure alpha prescription predicts thermal instability of a radiation-pressure-dominated alpha disk: a temperature increase makes heating outrun cooling. The absence of ubiquitous, large-amplitude thermal limit cycles in luminous AGN light curves indicates that this local model omits stabilizing effects, plausibly magnetic pressure and stress, vertical advection, winds, or a stress law that does not simply track total pressure.
Photogravitational restricted three-body problem Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-05
The photogravitational restricted three-body problem adds radial radiation pressure from one or both luminous primaries. If the pressure-to-gravity ratio of primary is , its effective attraction on the test particle is multiplied by .
Photon gas 2026-10-13
A photon gas is a collection of photons described statistically as radiation. Here the equilibrium model is homogeneous, isotropic electromagnetic radiation in vacuum at temperature : each photon has energy , with momentum and frequency , and there are two independent transverse states of electromagnetic polarization. An absorbing cavity with walls at a common temperature provides a way to establish this thermal equilibrium. The bulk formulas assume cavity dimensions much larger than the typical wavelength , so the electromagnetic mode density in a box can replace individual cavity modes by a continuum. [ref]
https://davidtong.org/teaching/statistical-physics/statmechhtml/S3#S3.SS2. David Tong, Statistical Physics, §3.2: photon energies, polarizations and cavity equilibrium
The crucial constraint is whether photon emission and photon absorption, or other number-changing processes, can equilibrate the photon population. When they can, photon number is not an independently conserved quantity and the equilibrium photon chemical potential is . For each polarization and frequency, the mean occupation number then follows the Bose-Einstein distribution:If number-changing processes are ineffective but number-conserving interactions redistribute energy, a constrained Bose-Einstein distribution can instead have with chemical potential fixed by the number constraint. Thus thermal equilibrium with respect to energy exchange alone does not establish . The zero value can also persist in an already prepared Planck photon distribution during suitable subsequent evolution; continual photon emission is not required to preserve it. [ref]
https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article/2014/6/06B107/1560917. Hiroyuki Tashiro, CMB spectral distortions and energy release in the early universe (2014), §3.1: kinetic equilibration without full photon-number equilibration
Combining with the two-polarization density of states, , gives the Planck photon distribution and the spectral photon energy density:Here is the spectral radiance in Planck's law; is stored energy density per unit frequency, not outgoing power per area. Their different units are connected by the full-sphere solid angle and the speed of light . The Boltzmann constant is , and is the Planck constant. [ref]
The equilibrium equation of state is particularly simple:The radiation constant is the same constant called in black-body radiation; is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. An outline of the energy density calculation substitutes and uses . The radiation pressure follows because the angular average of the squared directional component of photon momentum is for isotropy; the thermodynamic derivation of blackbody radiation pressure supplies an independent route. These formulas describe the radiation contribution, not the cavity walls. The isotropic massless relation survives a different isotropic spectrum, whereas the coefficient in requires the zero-chemical potential Planck photon distribution.
For a computed example with stipulated , the photon energy density is and the radiation pressure is . The photon number density in the International System of Units isHere is the Riemann zeta function. The mean photon energy differs from the energy at the peak of a spectral curve: counting photons and weighting them by energy emphasize different frequencies. The calculations use the exact International System of Units values of the Planck constant, Boltzmann constant and speed of light. [ref]
https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/meet-constants. NIST, Meet the Constants: exact SI defining constants
A motivating observation is the cosmic microwave background spectrum measured by the Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS) aboard COBE. Its apparatus used a polarizing Michelson interferometer, with one input viewing a roughly seven-degree sky patch and the other an internal blackbody. Scanning mirrors changed the optical path length difference; heat-sensitive detectors recorded the varying power, and Fourier transform spectroscopy recovered the spectral difference. Operation outside the terrestrial atmosphere removed atmospheric emission and absorption, while shielding and cooling the optics in a helium cryostat suppressed the instrument's own radiation. [ref]
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/cobe/firas/doc/FES4_APP_B.pdf. Mather, Fixsen and Shafer, Design for the COBE Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer, apparatus and systematic-error controls
Absolute calibration came from moving an external blackbody into the sky aperture, filling the same beam used for the sky. This was an iron-loaded epoxy absorber shaped as a re-entrant cone. Repeated reflections made it a close approximation to a blackbody, while thermometers supplied its temperature. Mather and colleagues explicitly evaluated reflections, temperature gradients, radiation leaking through the material and leakage around its edge. These are limits on how faithfully the calibrator realizes thermal equilibrium radiation, rather than details that can be eliminated merely by calling it black. [ref]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9810373. Mather et al., Calibrator Design for COBE FIRAS (1999): absorber geometry and calibration error budget
During sky observations the internal blackbody temperature was adjusted to nearly null the spectral difference, reducing gain and drift errors. Fixsen and colleagues' 1996 analysis used calibrated spectra over wavenumbers to , about to . They separated the sky's spatially uniform component, its dipole and Galactic emission, and varied sky cuts and foreground templates as controls. The resulting cosmic microwave background spectrum agreed with a single Planck function, with reported RMS deviations below 50 parts per million of its peak brightness. This is a residual statistic over the analyzed spectrum, not a pointwise relative error bound at every frequency. [ref]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9605054. Fixsen et al., The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set (1996), §§2, 5 and 5.3
The observation motivates using a photon gas as a physical model rather than merely a formal counting exercise. Its interpretation has a clear boundary: agreement with Planck's law constrains departures from an equilibrium spectral shape within the calibrated band and foreground assumptions; it does not directly measure radiation pressure or entropy density of a photon gas. Nor does it establish that today's cosmic microwave background is continually re-equilibrating with matter. A previously thermal spectrum can retain its Planck function shape as expansion of the universe lowers every photon frequency in the same proportion. The usefulness of the model is that one measured spectral temperature, together with its equilibrium assumptions, predicts energy density, radiation pressure, photon number density and entropy density of a photon gas consistently.
Physical cosmology 2026-10-18
Physical cosmology connects the universe's history to the measurable behaviour of its contents. The Friedmann equations describe cosmic expansion; atomic physics, radiation pressure and gravity determine what that expanding universe looks like. A particularly revealing example is the route from cosmological recombination through the photon-baryon fluid to the Cosmic microwave background acoustic peaks. The universe supplies the initial conditions and the laboratory; the prediction must still pass through a model of the telescope before it can be compared with observations.
The practical reward is that one sky contains several different tests. The Cosmic microwave background power spectrum carries information about the sound horizon, the cosmological baryon density and cosmic geometry. These are related quantities with different observational signatures. Angular sound-horizon degeneracy explains why measuring a characteristic angle alone cannot count the universe's baryons.
Pointwise alpha-prescription obstruction in a radiation-supported layer Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
In the exact constant-opacity, pure-radiation pressure diffusion model, dynamic viscosity is height-independent. Imposing an additional exact pointwise relation forces constant pressure, incompatible with nonzero vertical hydrostatic equilibrium away from the midplane. The characteristic-pressure alpha disk prescription can still be used for order-of-magnitude scalings; it is not an exact simultaneous vertical solution.
Radiation pressure Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-14
Radiation pressure is the normal momentum flux transferred by electromagnetic radiation to a surface. A photon travelling in vacuum carries momentum , where is its energy, its frequency, the Planck constant and the speed of light. Photon absorption transfers that momentum; specular reflection reverses its normal component. This lets light exert a force even when almost no energy becomes heat in the receiver.
Two useful formulas describe different preparations. A directed beam normally incident on a stationary perfect absorber gives pressure , and on a stationary perfect mirror gives . Here is light intensity, the incident power per beam cross-sectional area perpendicular to propagation, in . An isotropic photon gas has pressure , where is its radiation internal energy per volume, in . Stored energy density and travelling energy flux must be distinguished: an isotropic field can have zero net energy flux and positive radiation pressure.
The physical appeal is that the same momentum conservation connects a single photon collision, a mirror's measurable force, and a radiation-filled cavity's equation of state. The directional calculation below complements radiation pressure on a perfectly absorbing surface; the equilibrium spectrum and its temperature dependence belong to blackbody radiation and the photon gas.
Radiation pressure on circumplanetary dust 2026-10-06
The leading uniform stellar radiation pressure is a differential acceleration relative to a planet, of scale . Relative to planetocentric gravity at dust radius , its magnitude isThus lying inside a Hill sphere alone does not guarantee small radiative perturbations. Approximately circular tightly bound dust requires this ratio sufficiently small, as well as weak tides; the uniform radiative force can otherwise excite orbital eccentricity or unbind grains.
Radiation-supported inner-disk height 2026-10-05
The inner Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk is supported mainly by radiation pressure and has nearly constant electron-scattering opacity. Equating radiative diffusion with local dissipation and imposing vertical hydrostatic equilibrium gives the characteristic half-thicknessThe radiation-supported height approaches a plateau away from the inner boundary. The formal zero at that boundary is outside the reliable radiation-dominated approximation. At an Eddington accretion rate defined using efficiency , this height can make the inner flow only marginally thin.
Radiation-supported vertical disk 2026-10-06
A radiation-supported vertical disk has vertical hydrostatic equilibrium supplied mainly by radiation pressure. In a constant-opacity, optically thick layer in gravity , radiative diffusion gives . This statement applies at a fixed radius and does not resolve the optically thin surface.
Radiation-to-degeneracy pressure boundary 2026-10-06
Equating radiation pressure to cold electron degeneracy pressure gives . Because the two Electron pressure limits scale as and , this boundary has logarithmic slopes and , respectively. Above it, photon pressure can dominate even when the net Electrons remain degenerate; degeneracy of one component and dominance of the total pressure are different criteria. Thermal pairs modify the high-temperature pressure comparison.
Radiation-to-gas pressure ratio 2026-10-05
The radiation-to-gas pressure ratio compares radiation pressure with gas pressure. It is distinct from plasma beta, which compares gas pressure with magnetic pressure. Both are sometimes denoted by , so the convention must be stated.
Using the idealized CNO cycle law and constant electron-scattering opacity, homology relations for radiative stars giveThese retain ideal-gas pressure support; significant radiation pressure or convection changes the model.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with opacity and stellar energy-generation rate , radiative diffusion in a star gives . Integrating the heating rate instead gives . Equality in stellar thermal equilibrium yields the displayed radius law and . This fixes the dimensionless profiles and coefficients, and neglects radiation pressure; it is a model comparison rather than a universal law for all main sequence stars. At fixed mass and metal mass fraction, homogeneous hydrogen burning gives the homogeneous fuel-depletion luminosity feedback through .
