Codex @codex  0

For a fixed real unit vector $k$, the linear ordinary differential equation $\dot{r}=r-k\times r$ combines dilation with rotation about the axis $\mathbb{R}k$. Its solution from a line $s\ell$, with $|\ell |=1$, isSince $k\cdot r=s{e}^t\kappa$ and $|r|=|s|e^t$, the union of these characteristic curves is given by $|k\cdot r|=|\kappa ||r|$. For $0<|\kappa |<1$ it is a circular cone of semi-angle $\arccos |\kappa |$: varying $t$ supplies every azimuth and varying $s$ supplies every radius on both halves. For $\kappa =0$ it is a plane; for $|\kappa |=1$ it is only the axis. In the last case the line is itself a characteristic curve, so the initial data do not generate a two-dimensional surface. The cone is a smooth surface away from its vertex, and it is a graph of a function only on suitable patches. Invariance of a graph patch under characteristic curves holds only while the curve stays in its domain; global flow invariance requires continuation of that patch.

For a twice continuously differentiable regular curve $r(t)$ in Euclidean space, its unsigned curvature measures how quickly its unit tangent vector changes per unit arc length. WriteThe curvature iswhere the norm is the Euclidean norm. Differentiating with respect to arc length removes the effect of traversal speed; differentiating $T$ with respect to $t$ alone generally does not. See Ghomi's university lecture notes, section 1.7.

For a circle of radius $R>0$, use $r(t)=(R\cos t,R\sin t)$. Then $v=R$, $T=(-\sin t,\cos t)$ and $\Vert dT/dt\Vert =1$, giving $\kappa =1/R$. A straight line $r(t)=p+ta$ with $a\ne 0$ has constant unit tangent vector, so $\kappa =0$.

The same circle traversed as $q(u)=(R\cos (3u),R\sin (3u))$ has speed $3R$ and $\Vert dT/du\Vert =3$: its curvature remains $1/R$. By contrast, enlarging the circle to radius $2R$ changes its geometry and gives curvature $1/(2R)$. More generally, a dilation $r\mapsto ar$ with $a>0$ divides curvature by $a$, because it multiplies arc length by $a$ while leaving unit tangent vectors unchanged. Thus curvature has units of inverse length, and a reparametrization changes neither its value at a corresponding point nor the shape.

Differentiating $T\cdot T=1$, using the dot product, shows $T\cdot (dT/ds)=0$: the change is perpendicular to the unit tangent vector. Wherever $\kappa >0$, the principal normal vector $N_p=(dT/ds)/\kappa$ points toward the bend. For a plane curve, the osculating circle at such a point has radius of curvature $\rho =1/\kappa$ and center $r+\rho N_p$. It matches the point, tangent line, and curvature, providing a local circular approximation. At $\kappa =0$ there is no finite osculating circle defined by this formula. See Ghomi's university lecture notes, section 1.13.

This makes curvature useful for comparing bends without confusing them with speed. If $t$ denotes time, differentiating $r^{\prime }=vT$ gives acceleration $r^{\prime \prime }=v^{\prime }T+v^2(dT/ds)$, whose component perpendicular to the unit tangent vector has magnitude $v^2\kappa$. The curvature of a plane curve example below computes the bend and osculating circle of a parabola explicitly.

For smooth surfaces, bending has more than one direction. The principal curvatures $k_1,k_2$ instead define Gaussian curvature $K=k_1{k}_2$ and mean curvature $H=(k_1+k_2)/2$. These are surface quantities, distinct from the curvature of an individual curve. In particular, the circle value $1/R$ must not be confused with the Gaussian curvature $1/R^2$ of a sphere of radius $R$. See Ritter's Oxford lecture notes, section 12.2.

Differential geometry uses calculus to study smooth curves, smooth surfaces, and smooth manifolds. A tangent space describes possible instantaneous motions; a Riemannian metric turns those motions into measurable lengths and angles; curvature records how the resulting geometry differs from Euclidean geometry. Local calculations with derivatives can therefore answer geometric questions about whole shapes.

An especially revealing experiment is rolling a flat sheet into a circular cylinder without stretching it. The sheet visibly bends, yet a small creature measuring only arc lengths, angles, and surface areas detects the same geometry. This separates geometry measured within a surface from its bending in the surrounding Euclidean space. The first fundamental form encodes the measurements; the second fundamental form encodes the bending. The Theorema Egregium explains why a sphere behaves differently, while geodesics on a circular cylinder turn a route-planning problem into drawing a straight line.

The differential geometry of smooth surfaces studies their induced Riemannian metrics and intrinsic or extrinsic curvature. The first fundamental form measures lengths, while the second fundamental form and shape operator describe bending in an ambient Euclidean space. A regular parametric surface $X(u,v)$ must have linearly independent tangent vectors $X_u,X_v$: otherwise its parameters cannot provide a manifold chart with two independent directions.

For a sphere of radius $R>0$, use colatitude $0<\theta <\pi$ and longitude $\varphi$:Thus a change $d\varphi$ has arc length $R\sin \theta |d\varphi |$: equally spaced longitudes draw closer together toward a pole. The coordinate degeneracy at the poles belongs to this parametrization, not to the smooth surface.

Both principal curvatures of the sphere have magnitude $1/R$ and the same sign, giving Gaussian curvature $K=1/R^2$. A plane has $K=0$, and a circular cylinder also has $K=0$ because one principal curvature vanishes. These three familiar shapes show why visible bending alone cannot measure intrinsic Gaussian curvature.

The first fundamental form of a smooth surface $S\subseteq {\mathbb{R}}^3$ is the restriction of the ambient inner product to each tangent space $T_{p}S$. For a regular parametric surface $X(u,v)$, it is

Here $X_u^2$ means $X_u\cdot X_u$, not a componentwise square. The coefficients form the Gram matrix of the two coordinate tangent vectors. Regularity makes this a positive-definite matrix, so $E>0$ and $EG-F^2>0$.

To calculate the length of a curve $\gamma (t)=X(u(t),v(t))$, apply the chain rule and integrate its speed:The same inner product gives the angle $\alpha$ between nonzero tangent vectors $V,W$ through $\cos \alpha =I(V,W)/\sqrt{I(V,V)I(W,W)}$, and gives the area element $dA=\sqrt{EG-F^2}dudv$ as a positive density. One compact expression therefore supplies rulers, protractors, and surface area measurements.

For the lateral surface of a circular cylinder, take the circumferential arc length $u$ rather than the angle:Direct inner products give $E=G=1,F=0$, hence $I=d{u}^2+d{v}^2$. This is exactly the Euclidean metric on the unrolled plane. For instance, a path with $u=3t,v=4t$, $0\le t\le 1$, has length $5$ on either surface. Every corresponding path retains its length, not merely this example, so sufficiently small neighborhoods retain their intrinsic distances. The local isometry preserves angles and surface areas too. Globally $u$ is periodic with period $2\pi R$: unrolling requires a seam, and the whole circular cylinder is not a single planar manifold chart.

Rolling a sheet into a circular cylinder bends it without changing its internal lengths and angles. Fitting that same sheet smoothly onto a sphere requires distortion of its first fundamental form. Gaussian curvature distinguishes these situations: it measures the intrinsic curvature of a smooth surface, even though its simplest definition uses how the surface bends in Euclidean space.

The Gaussian curvature at a point is the determinant of the shape operator, or the product of the two principal curvatures:Here $I=Ed{u}^2+2Fdudv+Gd{v}^2$ is the first fundamental form and $II=ed{u}^2+2fdudv+gd{v}^2$ is the second fundamental form, with $S=-dN$. Regularity makes $EG-F^2>0$. Reversing the unit normal negates $e,f,g$ and both principal curvatures, leaving Gaussian curvature unchanged. ^[ref]

The sign describes bending at the point: positive Gaussian curvature means the principal curvatures have the same nonzero sign, as at an elliptic point; negative Gaussian curvature means opposite signs, as on a saddle; zero Gaussian curvature means at least one principal curvature vanishes. Zero Gaussian curvature at a single point does not imply that a neighborhood is a plane. ^[ref]

Four worked models make the signs concrete:

The patches use a common length unit, with $R=1$ for the sphere and circular cylinder. The marked red and blue curves have principal directions at the black point; the arrow is the chosen unit normal. For physical lengths, principal curvature and mean curvature have units of inverse length, while Gaussian curvature has units of inverse squared length. Rescaling a surface by $\lambda >0$ divides its principal curvatures by $\lambda$ and its Gaussian curvature by ${\lambda }^2$. Writing the saddle as $h=(x^2-y^2)/(2L)$ restores an explicit length scale: $K(0)=-1/L^2$.

The Theorema Egregium says that Gaussian curvature depends only on the first fundamental form and its first two coordinate derivatives. A local isometry therefore preserves Gaussian curvature, even if the shape operator and the principal curvatures change. ^[ref]

Here is the outline, rather than a full proof. The Gauss formula splits second derivatives of a parametric surface into tangential Christoffel symbols and the second fundamental form. The Christoffel symbols are determined by the first fundamental form and its first derivatives. Commuting the next partial derivatives gives the Gauss equation, which identifies $\det S$ with the intrinsic sectional curvature computed from the Riemann curvature tensor. Thus the apparently extrinsic product $k_1{k}_2$ is determined by the Riemannian metric. ^[ref]

One can see the distinction directly by rolling a plane strip with coordinates $(u,v)$ into the circular cylinder $X(u,v)=(R\cos (u/R),R\sin (u/R),v)$. Both have $I=d{u}^2+d{v}^2$, so the map is a local isometry, and is one-to-one on an open strip of width less than $2\pi R$. Extending $u$ over all real numbers wraps around periodically; it does not give a global isometry between the entire plane and the entire circular cylinder. A nonempty open patch of a sphere cannot be flattened by a local isometry into a plane, because its Gaussian curvature $1/R^2$ cannot become zero. The obstruction concerns preservation of the first fundamental form, rather than a particular drawing or choice of seam.

An embedded smooth surface $S\subset {\mathbb{R}}^3$ is inextendible when every connected smooth surface $\tilde{S}\subset {\mathbb{R}}^3$ containing $S$ is equal to $S$.

Mean curvature measures the average signed bending of a smooth surface. Unlike Gaussian curvature, it adds the two principal curvatures rather than multiplying them. A circular cylinder therefore has nonzero mean curvature despite zero Gaussian curvature, whereas a catenoid has zero mean curvature despite negative Gaussian curvature. The cancellation on a catenoid explains how a curved minimal surface can be stationary for surface area.

Choose a unit normal $N$ and the shape operator $S=-dN$, as in the second fundamental form convention $II(v,w)=⟨Sv,w⟩$. For a smooth surface in Euclidean space of dimension three, define the signed scalar mean curvature byHere $E,F,G$ are the coefficients of the first fundamental form, and $e,f,g$ those of the second fundamental form. The factor $1/2$ makes $H$ an average; the scalar trace convention instead calls $k_1+k_2=2H$ the mean curvature. Authors who use $S=+dN$ reverse both signs. A formula involving mean curvature is therefore incomplete unless its shape operator, unit normal, and averaging convention are specified.

In orientation reversal of surface curvature, both principal curvatures and $H$ change sign, while Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature vector do not. The units of mean curvature are inverse length, compared with inverse squared length for Gaussian curvature. The distinction matters in soap film pressure balance: pressure couples to the sum of the signed principal curvatures.

For an $n$-dimensional embedded submanifold, let $A$ denote its vector-valued second fundamental form and $e_1,\dots ,e_n$ an orthonormal basis of its tangent space. This branch uses the trace mean curvature vectorAn alternative averaged mean curvature vector is $\mathbf{H}/n$; on a smooth surface in three-dimensional Euclidean space, these are $2HN$ and $HN$, respectively. Reversing $N$ reverses $H$, so their product is independent of the chosen orientation of a surface. With the trace convention, the first variation of area formula has no additional factor $n$. For an outward-oriented sphere of radius $R$, $\mathbf{H}=-2N/R$: it points toward the centre even though the scalar's sign depends on conventions.

A minimal surface has vanishing mean curvature vector. For a smooth surface in three-dimensional Euclidean space, this means $H=0$, equivalently $k_1+k_2=0$. Thus Gaussian curvature is $K=-k_1^2\le 0$, but neither principal curvature needs to vanish. A plane and a catenoid both satisfy the condition, with very different Gaussian curvatures.

By the first variation of area formula, a minimal surface is a stationary point of surface area for every smooth variation that fixes its boundary, or has compact support in its interior. The word “minimal” specifies this differential equation; it does not guarantee a global minimum of surface area, or even a local minimum. A stable minimal surface imposes a further condition on the second variation.

For an oriented piecewise smooth surface $S$ and a continuously differentiable vector field, Stokes theorem stateswhere the boundary orientation is induced by $n$ through the right-hand rule. Choose the upward orientation of the elliptic paraboloid. Its band has cylindrical radius $1/2\le r\le 1$, and a parametrization isIts oriented surface element and scalar area element areThe requested sketch shows the open band, not a capped solid.

For the specified vector field, direct differentiation gives $\nabla \times B=(0,0,3x^2+3y^2)$. HenceTo check this by Stokes theorem, parametrize a counterclockwise circle of radius $\rho$ at height ${\rho }^2$ by $r_{\rho }(\phi )=(\rho \cos \phi ,\rho \sin \phi ,{\rho }^2)$. Along it $dz=0$, andUsing ${\int }_0^{2\pi }{\sin }^4\phi d\phi ={\int }_0^{2\pi }{\cos }^4\phi d\phi =3\pi /4$ gives $3\pi {\rho }^4/2$. The induced outer circle is counterclockwise as viewed from above, and the inner circle is clockwise. ThereforeThis verifies the direct surface integral and the Stokes flux through an annular paraboloid. Reversing the chosen surface orientation reverses the final sign.

For an oriented smooth surface $S$ with piecewise smooth, consistently oriented boundary, Stokes theorem givesfor a continuously differentiable vector field defined on a neighborhood of $S$. Choose the upward normal vector here. The surface is an annular band of an elliptic paraboloid, parametrized byUsing ${\partial }_{r}r\times {\partial }_{\theta }r$ as the oriented vector area element givesThe sketch below shows the open band, not a capped solid. Its upper circle has radius one and its lower circle radius one third.

Differentiating the given vector field yieldsThe surface integral is thereforeFor the boundary line integral, the upward normal vector induces counterclockwise traversal of the outer circle and clockwise traversal of the inner circle, as viewed from above. On a circle of radius $R$, parametrized counterclockwise, $z$ is constant andSince each fourth power integrates to $3\pi /4$, the two-circle line integral isconfirming Stokes theorem and the Stokes flux through an annular paraboloid. Reversing the chosen orientation changes both integrals to $-40\pi /27$.

For $v\in T_{p}S$ sufficiently small, let ${\gamma }_v$ be the geodesic with ${\gamma }_v(0)=p$, ${\dot{\gamma }}_v(0)=v$, and define ${\exp }_p(v)={\gamma }_v(1)$. The domain consists more generally of initial velocities whose geodesic exists through time one. Uniqueness and affine rescaling give ${\exp }_p(tv)={\gamma }_v(t)$ near zero, soThus the differential is the identity under the natural identification of tangent spaces, and the inverse function theorem makes the exponential map a local diffeomorphism near zero.

A punctured plane has geodesics reaching its missing point in finite time, so its exponential map need not be global; adding the point remedies this example. But an extension cannot always remedy the failure. On the punctured circular cone $S=\{(r\cos \theta ,r\sin \theta ,r):r>0\}$, radial generators are geodesics and reach the missing point in finite intrinsic length. Any globally defined extension would have to include their limiting point $(0,0,0)$. The cone's tangent planes have different limits as $\theta$ varies; no smooth embedded surface through that point can contain this punctured circular cone. Hence no such extension exists for this $S$.

For an oriented surface and a closed topological disc $D$ with smooth positively oriented boundary, the Gauss-Bonnet theorem with boundary saysHere $k_g$ is signed geodesic curvature with the disc on the left. A smooth boundary has no corner terms; piecewise smooth boundaries require exterior-angle terms.

For the flat disc in the problem this gives ${\int }_{\partial D}{k}_{g}ds=2\pi$. Conditions (i) and (ii) mean that the proposed replacement disc has the same boundary and agrees with the original smooth surface from the outside. Smoothness therefore gives the same tangent planes, metric derivatives and boundary geodesic curvature on the replacement, with consistent orientation. Applying Gauss-Bonnet to that disc forcesThus these gluing conditions fix the total curvature of any smooth replacement disc, regardless of its detailed interior shape.

The nonnegative continuous Gaussian curvature on the compact replacement disc, together with its zero integral established by Gauss-Bonnet, forces it to vanish at every point of that disc. Outside it the replacement surface agrees with the original flat surface, so its curvature also vanishes there; smoothness covers the common boundary. Consequently no point of the replacement surface can have positive Gaussian curvature. Therefore no surface can satisfy all three conditions. A disc with some positive curvature could only have compensating negative curvature or alter the smooth boundary gluing, both excluded here.

A smooth surface in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ is a subset locally parametrized by a smooth map of two variables whose derivative has rank two and which is a homeomorphism onto its image.

Writing $\rho =\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$, the first surface equation becomesIt is the torus of major radius $R=2\sqrt{2}$ and minor radius $r=1$, with smooth parametrizationSince $R>r$, this is an embedding. The Gaussian curvature of a torus is

For the second surface, use the orthogonal transformationIts equation becomes the same torus equation $(\sqrt{X^2+Y^2}-2\sqrt{2}{)}^2+Z^2=1$. Orthogonal transformations are Euclidean isometries and preserve Gaussian curvature. Curvature vanishes where $\cos v=0$, equivalently $Z=\pm 1$. In the original coordinates the zero-curvature points are therefore exactly

For an oriented smooth surface $S$, the Gauss map sends $p$ to the chosen unit normal vector $N(p)\in S^2$. Since $|N{|}^2=1$, differentiation shows that $D{N}_p(X)$ is perpendicular to $N(p)$ and hence lies in $T_{p}S$.

In a local parametrization $\varphi (u,v)$ with $n=N\circ \varphi$, differentiatinggivesThus the bilinear form $(X,Y)\mapsto D{N}_p(X)\cdot Y$ is symmetric, so $D{N}_p$ is self-adjoint. The Gaussian curvature isWriting the coefficients of the first fundamental form asand those of the second fundamental form asone obtains

At an umbilic point, the self-adjoint map $D{N}_p$ has a repeated eigenvalue, so it is a scalar map. If every point is umbilic, there is a function $\lambda$ withEquality of mixed partial derivatives givesThe two tangent vectors are linearly independent, hence ${\lambda }_u={\lambda }_v=0$. Since ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ is connected, $\lambda$ is constant.

If $\lambda =0$, then $n$ is constant andso $S$ lies in a plane. If $\lambda \ne 0$, thenThus $n-\lambda \varphi =c$ is constant, andTherefore $S$ lies in a sphere of radius $1/|\lambda |$. This proves that the surface is part of a plane or part of a sphere.

The condition $D{f}_p\ne 0$ says that $0$ is a regular value of $f$. The regular level set theorem therefore makes $f^{-1}(0)$ a smooth submanifold of codimension one in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$, hence a smooth surface.

Forthe gradient isOn $F^{-1}(0)$, $x^2+y^2=\cosh (z^2)\ge 1$, so $x$ and $y$ cannot both vanish. Thus $\nabla F\ne 0$ there, and the given set is a smooth surface.

Not every smooth surface in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ is a global zero set. Every set $f^{-1}(0)$ is closed because $f$ is continuous, whereas the open unit diskis a smooth surface but is not closed in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$.

One sufficient version of the divergence theorem is the following. Let $R$ be a bounded region in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ with a closed, piecewise smooth surface as its boundary, and let $\mathbf{F}$ be a continuously differentiable function with values in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ on an open neighbourhood of the closure of $R$. With $\mathbf{n}$ the outward unit normal vector,The boundary surface integral is the total outward flux integral. If the boundary has several components, each has the outward orientation relative to the material of $R$; inner components therefore point into the holes. Edges and isolated vertices may be omitted when assigning the unit normal vector, since they have zero surface area.

At a point of a smooth surface, a normal section of a surface can bend by different amounts depending on its tangent vector. The principal curvatures are the largest and smallest signed normal curvatures among unit tangent vectors. Equivalently they are the two eigenvalues $k_1,k_2$ of the shape operator, with an orthonormal basis $e_1,e_2$ of corresponding principal directions. Here the labels follow the selected directions, without requiring $k_1\le k_2$. ^[ref]

For a unit tangent vector making angle $\theta$ with $e_1$, Euler formula for normal curvature givesThe normal curvature is a weighted average of the principal curvatures; the extremes occur in the principal directions. If the principal curvatures coincide, every direction in the tangent plane is a principal direction: this is an umbilical point. The Gaussian curvature and mean curvature summarize the pair by

For an outward-oriented sphere of radius $R$, both principal curvatures are $-1/R$, so the normal curvature is $-1/R$ in every direction. For an outward-oriented circular cylinder, choose $e_1$ around the circumference and $e_2$ along the axis. The principal curvatures are $-1/R,0$, giving $k_n(\theta )=-{\cos }^2\theta /R$; halfway between the principal directions, $k_n(\pi /4)=-1/(2R)$.

At the origin of the upward-oriented hyperbolic paraboloid $z=(x^2-y^2)/2$, the principal directions are the coordinate axes and the principal curvatures are $1,-1$ in the chosen length unit. Thus $k_n(\theta )=\cos (2\theta )$, with zero normal curvature at $\theta =\pi /4,3\pi /4$. Zero normal curvature in these directions coexists with Gaussian curvature $-1$: the shape operator is not zero. The mean curvature is zero at this point; this does not say that the whole hyperbolic paraboloid is a minimal surface.

Each graph uses angle $\theta$ in the tangent plane, measured from the indicated first principal direction. The sphere and circular cylinder have $R=1$; the saddle graph refers only to the origin. Reversing the unit normal reflects each normal curvature graph through zero, negates both principal curvatures and the mean curvature, and preserves their product, the Gaussian curvature.

The shape operator measures how the unit normal turns as we move along a smooth surface. A plane has a constant unit normal, whereas the outward unit normal of a sphere turns in every direction in the tangent plane. Keeping the direction of this change, rather than just its magnitude, lets one recover the principal curvatures and their principal directions.

Choose an orientation of a surface $M\subset {\mathbb{R}}^3$, with Gauss map $N:M\to S^2$. The shape operator at $p$ is the linear mapHere $d{N}_p$ is the differential of the Gauss map. Its output belongs to $T_{N(p)}{S}^2$, identified with $T_{p}M$ because both are the vector plane perpendicular to $N(p)$. The minus sign is our convention throughout this branch. ^[ref]

The shape operator packages the second fundamental form as an operator using the inner product supplied by the first fundamental form:The symmetry of the second fundamental form makes the shape operator a self-adjoint operator for this inner product. Thus an orthonormal basis of principal directions diagonalizes it. In a coordinate basis $X_u,X_v$ of a parametric surface, writeThe matrix $[S]$ need not be a symmetric matrix in this coordinate basis: its self-adjointness means $A[S]=[S{]}^{T}A=B$. Using the eigenvalues of $B$ alone gives the principal curvatures only when $A$ is the identity matrix. ^[ref]

For a worked example, parametrize the lateral surface of an outward-oriented circular cylinder of radius $R>0$ using circumferential arc length $u$ and axial coordinate $v$:The coordinate tangent vectors are an orthonormal basis. Since $N_u=X_u/R$ and $N_v=0$, the shape operator satisfiesChanging to angular coordinate $\phi =u/R$ gives $A=\mathrm{diag}(R^2,1)$ and $B=\mathrm{diag}(-R,0)$; $A^{-1}B$ still has eigenvalues $-1/R,0$. This is why the first fundamental form must participate in the calculation.

For a sphere of radius $R$ centered at the origin, the outward unit normal is $N(p)=p/R$. Hence $S_{p}v=-v/R$, so both principal curvatures are $-1/R$. For a plane, $dN=0$ and the shape operator vanishes. Reversing the unit normal negates the shape operator and both principal curvatures; the Gaussian curvature remains unchanged while the mean curvature changes sign, as in orientation reversal of surface curvature.

For smooth surfaces, Gaussian curvature depends only on the first fundamental form and its first two coordinate derivatives. Consequently any smooth local isometry $f:M\to N$ satisfies $K_N(f(p))=K_M(p)$. The surprise is that $K$ is defined using the shape operator, which describes bending in space, yet its value can be recovered from measurements made entirely within the surface.

In his 1827 paper, Carl Friedrich Gauss expressed Gaussian curvature through the metric coefficients and their partial derivatives in Article 11, then stated its invariance under development in Article 12. Article 13 explicitly compares a plane with surfaces developable onto it, including cylindrical surfaces. The paper was presented on 8 October 1827 and printed in 1828; the Morehead–Hiltebeitel English translation appeared in 1902. ^[ref]

A plane and a circular cylinder can have different principal curvatures while both have $K=0$. Their matching first fundamental forms exhibit the actual local isometry. In contrast, no nonempty open patch of a sphere of radius $R$ can be flattened smoothly into a plane while preserving its first fundamental form: $1/R^2$ cannot become zero. Making the patch small reduces practical distortion, but never produces an exact local isometry. This is a geometric obstruction to a perfectly distance-preserving flat map of a spherical world, independent of where one places a seam.

The following proof outline connects the two descriptions of Gaussian curvature. For a parametric surface with metric coefficients $g_{ij}$, decompose its second derivatives by the Gauss formulaTaking tangent vector inner products determines the lowered Christoffel symbols solely from the Riemannian metric:Comparing $X_{ijk}$ and $X_{ikj}$ gives the Gauss equationConsequentlywhere $R_{1212}$ is the corresponding component of the intrinsic Riemann curvature tensor, with the sign convention in the displayed Gauss equation. The final expression uses only $g_{ij}$ and its first two derivatives.