16S ribosomal RNA 2026-11-05
16S ribosomal RNA is the ribosomal RNA of the small ribosomal subunit in bacteria and archaea. Together with ribosomal proteins, this RNA forms the small subunit's architecture, which positions messenger RNA for translation. The name refers to a sedimentation coefficient of about16 svedbergs: it is neither a count of subunits nor a length in nucleotides. The RNA molecule and the DNA gene encoding it are different molecules, even when a DNA sequencing assay is informally described as “16S sequencing”.[ref]
Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit by B. T. Wimberly and others. Abstract: bacterial30S structure and its RNA–protein architecture
A structural example is the bacterial30S small ribosomal subunit: the2000 X-ray crystallography study of B. T. Wimberly and colleagues resolved its RNA–protein architecture at3Å resolution. At a different scale, 16S ribosomal RNA sequences can serve as inherited characters for phylogenetic analysis. The1977 study by George E. Fox and colleagues compared ribosomal RNA oligonucleotide cataloguing results from methane-producing organisms with those from other organisms, helping expose a deep evolutionary division.[ref][ref]
Classification of methanogenic bacteria by 16S ribosomal RNA characterization by George E. Fox and others. Abstract and pp.4537–4541: comparative16S characterization
A useful caution is that one genome need not contain just one16S gene, and its copies need not have identical nucleotide sequences. Silvia G. Acinas and colleagues explicitly measured this variation across sequenced genomes. As a hypothetical example, two distinct16S DNA sequences recovered from a sample could represent two organisms, or two copies in one organism. Counting distinct sequences therefore requires more interpretation than counting organisms.[ref]
Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons by Silvia G. Acinas and others. Abstract: intragenomic variation and copy-number effects
22R-Hydroxycholesterol 2026-11-05
22R-Hydroxycholesterol is a cholesterol derivative bearing an additional hydroxyl group at carbon 22, with configuration at that position. Its neutral molecular formula is . The stereochemical qualifier identifies a spatial arrangement, while the number 22 identifies the modified carbon.[ref]
It is the first intermediate in the three-step reaction sequence of the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme. A second hydroxylation precedes cleavage into pregnenolone and 4-Methylpentanal.[ref]
Atom counting separates addition of oxygen from loss of carbon. Relative to cholesterol's , the intermediate gains one oxygen without changing the carbon count. Hydroxylating a carbon–hydrogen position replaces C–H by C–OH; it does not necessarily add an extra net hydrogen to the molecular formula.
A 2011 X-ray crystallography study observed the intermediate bound to the enzyme, with its hydroxyl oxygen from the haem iron in the reported structure.[ref]
Structural basis for three-step sequential catalysis by the cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme CYP11A1 by Natalia Mast and others. Abstract, intermediate-bound structure
This gives a concrete position for a chemically specified intermediate. It does not mean that every bound molecule has already completed the subsequent reactions. A. M. de Vos 2026-11-05
A. M. de Vos investigated how growth hormone binds its growth hormone receptor. With colleagues, de Vos determined the X-ray crystallography structure of a complex containing human growth hormone and the extracellular portion of its receptor. The 1992 structure, measured at , contained one hormone molecule and two receptor molecules.[ref]
The growth hormone molecule contacted the two receptors through different binding surfaces, although the receptors used largely the same residues in each contact. Additional contact between the two receptors supported a model in which hormone binding brings a receptor pair together. This made the geometry of signal transduction concrete: a single bound hormone can organize more than one receptor molecule. The measured complex contained extracellular fragments, so the structure did not by itself record the complete activation process across a cell membrane.[ref]
Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex by A. M. de Vos and others. Abstract; distinct hormone-binding interfaces, receptor contacts and proposed sequential dimerization
Andrew Philip Carter 2026-11-05
Andrew Philip Carter contributed to structural explanations of bacterial translation initiation. His own MRC-hosted curriculum vitae directly links that full name to the 2001 paper credited to A. P. Carter, which determined a complex of bacterial initiation factor IF1 and the 30S ribosomal subunit.[ref]
Curriculum vitae of Andrew Philip Carter. Page1, full name; page9, publication54
The X-ray crystallography structure showed IF1 occupying the ribosomal A site. It also revealed displacement of bases A1492 and A1493 of 16S ribosomal RNA, along with changes extending beyond the immediate binding region. A localized protein interaction can therefore influence the conformation of a much larger RNA–protein assembly.[ref]
Crystal structure of an initiation factor bound to the 30S ribosomal subunit by A. P. Carter and others. Abstract, A-site occlusion and long-range conformational changes; associated structure PDB1HR0
For an original occupancy example, imagine 100 otherwise identical snapshots in a model where IF1 and a second ligand cannot occupy the same A-site region. If IF1 occupies that region in 70 snapshots, at most 30 permit that other ligand's simultaneous occupancy. This geometric exclusion does not imply that 70 percent of biological translation is prevented: productive initiation places the initiator transfer RNA at the distinct ribosomal P site, and the actual pathway includes further steps. Site identity matters more than a generic statement that a factor blocks RNA binding.
The structural result supplies a concrete physical mechanism to compare with functional assays. Binding location, conformational rearrangement and eventual protein synthesis remain different observations.
Andrew Carter, named portrait on the MRC Carter Laboratory People page
. Averell L. Gnatt 2026-11-05
Averell L. Gnatt studied the protein structure of RNA polymerase II, the enzyme that carries out much of eukaryotic transcription. In 2001, he and colleagues determined an X-ray crystallography structure of an actively transcribing complex at a spatial detail of . The complex contained both the DNA template and the growing RNA, allowing their paths through the enzyme to be followed.[ref]
Incoming paired DNA entered a cleft and separated before the active site. A nine-base-pair DNA-RNA hybrid held the newly copied region, while the growing RNA end lay at the site where the next nucleotide would be added. Thus only a short local stretch of the product remained paired to its template: the rest of the RNA could leave as copying continued. Comparison with the free enzyme also showed closure of a protein clamp over the bound DNA and RNA, connecting a change in protein structure with stable engagement during transcription.[ref]
Structural Basis of Transcription: An RNA Polymerase II Elongation Complex at 3.3 Å Resolution by Averell L. Gnatt and others. Abstract; nine-base-pair hybrid, RNA exit groove and clamp closure
Bacterial initiation factor IF1 2026-11-05
Bacterial initiation factor IF1 is a bacterial translation initiation factor that binds at the ribosomal A site of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Occupying that position helps organize initiation around the ribosomal P site, where the initiator transfer RNA must be placed. X-ray crystallography showed that IF1 occludes the A site and changes the arrangement of nearby 16S ribosomal RNA bases, with conformational effects extending through the subunit.[ref]
Crystal structure of an initiation factor bound to the 30S ribosomal subunit by A. P. Carter and others. Abstract, IF1–30S structure and A1492/A1493 displacement
IF1 also cooperates with bacterial initiation factor IF2 and bacterial initiation factor IF3. In a reconstituted assembly experiment, recruiting IF1 stabilized an otherwise short-lived factor complex. Occupying a site and stabilizing neighboring components are complementary functions.[ref]
Real-time assembly landscape of bacterial 30S translation initiation complex by Pohl Milón and others. Abstract and Figure2, IF1 recruitment and stabilization
For an original experimental comparison, measure the time that a fluorescently labeled factor remains bound with and without IF1, while keeping other components fixed. A change in residence time would indicate altered assembly stability. A separate biological translation readout is still needed to establish that the stabilized assembly produces protein; stable binding alone does not prove productive initiation.
Ben F. Luisi 2026-11-05
Ben F. Luisi coauthored a 2000 X-ray crystallography study of polynucleotide phosphorylase. It revealed a protein trimer with a central channel, providing a structural model for how a multicomponent enzyme might retain and process RNA.[ref]
A duplicated fold is the structural basis for polynucleotide phosphorylase catalytic activity, processivity, and regulation by M. F. Symmons and others. Abstract, Results and Conclusions
The authors' 2002 account supplies the full byline Ben F. Luisi.[ref]The polynucleotide phosphorylase central channel was observed without bound RNA; a role in processivity was proposed rather than directly filmed.[ref]
An original probability model illustrates the proposed retention advantage. Suppose an enzyme completes one cleavage, then remains associated for another with probability , independently after each cleavage. The number of completed cleavages in one encounter hasThus changing from to changes the mean run from to cleavages without specifying how quickly an individual cleavage happens. This invented geometric distribution separates processivity from reaction rate; it is not a fitted model or measured result from Luisi's paper.
Brian T. Wimberly 2026-11-05
Brian T. Wimberly is a researcher in RNA structure and ribosome function. The full byline of the 2000 paper on the bacterial small ribosomal subunit establishes the expansion of the credited initials B. T. Wimberly. The paper lists him among six equally contributing authors at the forefront of its structural work.[ref]
Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit by B. T. Wimberly and others. Publisher author list, affiliations and equal-contribution note
The team determined a 30S ribosomal subunit structure refined to resolution using X-ray crystallography. It located the folded ribosomal RNA and associated ribosomal proteins in a molecular model, providing a framework for interpreting decoding, assembly and biochemical interactions.[ref]
Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit by B. T. Wimberly and others. Abstract; Figures 1–2, electron-density maps and structure overview
The intellectual advance connected molecular arrangement to a function: how a ribosome reads a messenger RNA sequence. The small ribosomal subunit organizes the interactions of codons with transfer RNA anticodons, so the geometry of its RNA and proteins constrains explanations of decoding.
A constructed comparison clarifies what a structural measurement contributes. Two models could contain the same list of molecules yet place a functional contact apart in one and apart in the other. Composition alone cannot distinguish them; spatial evidence can. This is not a distance reported in the paper, and nominal spatial resolution should not be interpreted as identical coordinate precision for every atom.
Wimberly's institutional biography also describes using complementary structural methods to relate RNA organization to biological function.[ref]
Brian T. Wimberly
. Portrait identified by the New York Structural Biology Center profile: nysbc.org/people/brian-wimberly . B. Shaanan 2026-11-05
B. Shaanan determined a human oxyhemoglobin structure by single-crystal X-ray crystallography in a 1983 paper bearing that exact single-author byline. The experiment used an Arndt–Wonacott camera at and reported a resolution of .[ref]
Structure of human oxyhaemoglobin at 2.1 A resolution by B. Shaanan. Byline; Abstract, diffraction apparatus and resolution
It supplied an experimental arrangement against which molecular explanations of hemoglobin oxygen binding could be tested.The paper distinguished the local environments in the alpha-globin and beta-globin subunits and specified iron positions relative to defined porphyrin planes. Shaanan also coauthored the later deoxyhemoglobin study with G. Fermi, Max Perutz and R. Fourme.[ref]
The crystal structure of human deoxyhaemoglobin at 1.74 A resolution by G. Fermi and others. Primary byline
Comparing the two ligation states requires consistent geometric definitions; distances from different reference planes are different observables.An original plane-fitting example makes that distinction concrete. A point at coordinate angstrom is 0.30 angstrom from the plane , but only 0.10 angstrom from the parallel plane angstrom. The atom has not moved. Changing the atoms used to define a fitted plane can change a reported displacement.
For a unit normal and point on a reference plane, signed distance from position isReversing the normal reverses the sign; translating both the model and its plane by the same vector leaves unchanged. These are geometric checks for interpreting a structural comparison, not additional measurements from the paper.
The value of the structural work is therefore more specific than an image of a protein: it turns questions about oxygen-binding geometry into quantities with stated reference conventions and experimental support. The published initials are retained rather than assuming a full identity from a similarly named crystallographer.
C3c 2026-11-05
C3c is a major proteolysis product of Complement C3. It is a processed fragment, distinct from the small inflammatory fragment C3a and the activated C3b from which later breakdown products can be generated. A fragment name identifies a particular piece of the original protein, rather than a separate gene product.
The 1969 fragment-isolation study separated C3c and a smaller fragment from enzyme-treated C3b and distinguished them antigenically. This is a biochemical way to establish that further processing yields different molecular pieces.[ref]
In 2005, X-ray crystallography provided crystal structures of native Complement C3 and C3c. Comparing their protein domain arrangements connected cleavage with changes in molecular architecture. The deposited structures are 2A73 for native Complement C3 and 2A74 for C3c.[ref]
Structures of complement component C3 provide insights into the function and evolution of immunity by Bert J. C. Janssen and others. Abstract; Figures1–2; coordinate-deposition statement
Consider an original interpretation exercise: an antibody signal from a region retained in C3c could persist after the intact precursor has disappeared. Such a signal would not by itself measure intact Complement C3, newly generated C3a or surface-attached C3b. Knowing the recognized region and the sample's processing state is essential when choosing what an assay measures.
Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme 2026-11-05
The cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, also designated CYP11A1, is a Cytochrome P450 that converts cholesterol into pregnenolone and 4-Methylpentanal. Its official accepted name is cholesterol monooxygenase (side-chain-cleaving), EC 1.14.15.6. Two hydroxylations precede cleavage between carbon positions 20 and 22.[ref]
Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in IUBMB Enzyme Nomenclature. overall reaction, steps 1a–1c and Comments
Adrenodoxin supplies electrons to the enzyme; NADPH is an upstream electron source. For the fully coupled net reaction, each pregnenolone formed requires three oxygen molecules and six reduced adrenodoxins. Thus an ideal conversion consumes oxygen and six micromoles of one-electron donor equivalents. The carbon balance is , partitioning the original steroid and its shortened side chain.[ref]
Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in IUBMB Enzyme Nomenclature. Reaction and electron-transfer pathway
In 2011, Natalia Mast and colleagues combined X-ray crystallography with solution spectroscopy. Their structure contained 22R-Hydroxycholesterol, the first intermediate, whose hydroxyl oxygen lay from the haem iron. Changing adrenodoxin conditions altered carbon monoxide access to reduced haem in a spectroscopic test.[ref]
Together, these measurements connect substrate positioning with a perturbation in solution. The proposed movement of intermediates during successive reactions is a mechanistic interpretation of the combined evidence; a single structure is a snapshot of one bound state.
Chris Oubridge 2026-11-05
Chris Oubridge investigated the structural basis of RNA splicing and RNA recognition by proteins. The original 1994 publisher record names him as first author of the U1A protein–RNA hairpin structure previously cited under C. Oubridge.[ref]
Crystal structure at 1.92 A resolution of the RNA-binding domain of the U1A spliceosomal protein complexed with an RNA hairpin by C. Oubridge and others. Publisher byline and Abstract, DOI10.1038/372432a0
His institutional obituary records 1966–2020 and describes his contributions to spliceosome structural studies.[ref]Chris Oubridge obituary at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Named heading and research account
The 1994 X-ray crystallography study resolved an RNA-binding domain with a 21-nucleotide RNA hairpin with a resolution of 1.92 angstroms. Its ten-nucleotide loop lies on the domain's beta sheet; contacts involving the loop sequence include hydrogen bonds. This provides a physical explanation of sequence recognition, rather than treating a matching letter sequence as sufficient without a compatible RNA structure.[ref]
For an original affinity example, suppose changing a loop raises a measured dissociation constant from to . At 298 kelvin, the corresponding change in standard binding Gibbs free energy iswhere is the molar gas constant. These are stipulated values, not measurements from the 1994 paper. A structure can motivate which contacts to test, while an independent binding affinity measurement establishes the net energetic effect; counting visible contacts alone does not supply that effect.
Oubridge also shared first authorship of the 2009 U1 snRNP functional-core structure, connecting the study of an individual recognition domain with the arrangement of RNA and proteins in a larger assembly.[ref]
Crystal structure of human spliceosomal U1 snRNP at 5.5 Å resolution by Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel and others. Byline, equal-contribution note and Abstract
Chris Oubridge in the laboratory, named photograph in the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology obituary
. Collagen triple helix 2026-11-05
A collagen triple helix is a protein structure in which three polypeptide chains wind together into a right-handed superhelix; each individual chain has a left-handed, polyproline-II-like conformation. It is characteristic of collagen and differs from a single alpha helix. The close-packed structure connects protein primary structure to a three-chain assembly: glycine commonly occurs at every third residue in the triple-helical region, conventionally written Gly–X–Y.[ref]
Structure of collagen by G. N. Ramachandran and G. Kartha. 1955 revised triple-chain model; the contemporary 1956 clarification describes the refinement from the 1954 proposal.
[ref]Crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like peptide at 1.9 angstrom resolution by J. Bella and others. Abstract: supercoiled polyproline-II helices and interchain hydrogen bonding.
Glycine's small side group permits close approach near the central axis. Proline and hydroxyproline are frequent at the other positions, while interchain hydrogen bonds and interactions with water help organize the assembly. A model segment with ten Gly–X–Y repeats has 30 residues per chain and 90 across three chains; the three-chain count is distinct from the three-residue sequence period.
The structural picture developed from fiber-diffraction constraints in work by G. N. Ramachandran, G. Kartha and other investigators, rather than from directly seeing every atom in an intact tissue. Later, a synthetic collagen-like peptide provided a sharper test. Its 1994 X-ray crystallography structure, reported at angstrom resolution, confirmed triple-helical packing and interchain bonding. A deliberately introduced glycine-to-alanine substitution caused local untwisting and replaced direct interchain contacts near the substitution with water-mediated bridges.[ref]
Crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like peptide at 1.9 angstrom resolution by J. Bella and others. Abstract: synthetic peptide, Gly-to-Ala substitution, hydration cylinder and altered local bonding.
The experiment illustrates why sequence changes can affect a material: even a small side-group change can disturb local packing. The triple-helical molecule is one level of organization; the larger collagen fiber includes additional assembly beyond these three chains.
Crystallographic resolution 2026-11-05
Crystallographic resolution describes the spatial detail represented by a diffraction data set and the resulting electron density map. In X-ray crystallography, its conventional numerical measure is the smallest lattice-plane spacing represented by measured reflections. A smaller stated distance means finer nominal resolution.[ref]
Resolution in the IUCr Online Dictionary of Crystallography. Definition: minimum plane spacing and measured diffraction range
From Bragg's law, first-order diffraction at the largest measured glancing angle giveswhere is the X-ray wavelength. For an illustrative wavelength and , the nominal resolution is . At the same wavelength and a maximum angle of15degrees, it is about : collecting smaller-angle reflections alone omits finer spatial information.[ref]
The2000 structure of a bacterial small ribosomal subunit provides a concrete use of the term: its primary report describes refinement to3Å resolution and interprets RNA–protein architecture. That number characterizes the data/model's spatial detail, not an assertion that every atomic coordinate has exactly3Å uncertainty. Noise, missing reflections, directional coverage and model errors still matter.[ref]
Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit by B. T. Wimberly and others. Abstract: Thermus thermophilus30S subunit refined to3Å
Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel 2026-11-05
Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel contributed to determining the architecture of U1 snRNP, a small nuclear ribonucleoprotein involved in recognizing a splice site during RNA splicing. He is a joint first author of the 2009 X-ray crystallography study of its human functional core.[ref]
Crystal structure of human spliceosomal U1 snRNP at 5.5 Å resolution by Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel and others. Byline, equal-contribution note and Abstract
The investigators reconstituted a particle from RNA and proteins, collected diffraction at the Swiss Light Source and obtained a 5.5-angstrom electron density map. Heavy-atom labeling supplied positional landmarks for fitting individual proteins, including the seven Sm proteins. The crystallized construct omitted the U1A protein and used engineered or truncated components; the paper separately modeled the more complete particle.[ref]
An original counting example clarifies that distinction. Seven Sm proteins, two additional U1-specific proteins and one U1 small nuclear RNA make ten molecular subunits, of which nine are proteins. Adding the omitted U1A protein gives ten proteins plus the RNA, rather than ten total subunits. This counts molecular components without asserting that every crystallized polypeptide has its full native sequence.
The scientific value is the spatial organization: a list of component names alone cannot show how RNA and proteins support one another. Conversely, the arrangement of an engineered functional core must be interpreted with its composition and resolution in view, rather than presented as an unmodified whole spliceosome.
EF hand 2026-11-05
An EF hand is a protein structural motif in which two alpha helices flank a loop. In a canonical calcium-binding EF hand, the loop contains 12 amino acid residues whose oxygen-containing groups organize a calcium ion site. PROSITE identifies coordinating positions 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 12; the final glutamate or aspartate can contribute two oxygen atoms. The motif is an arrangement of a chain, not a literal separate hand-shaped molecule.[ref]
EF-hand calcium-binding domain signature and profile in PROSITE. PDOC00018, Description: loop organization and coordinating positions
Structural evidence makes the arrangement concrete. The deposited calmodulin structure PDB 1CLL was determined by X-ray crystallography at resolution. Its model contains four calcium ions and two EF-hand binding loops in each lobe. A resolved ion and surrounding coordinates support a structural binding-site interpretation; they do not by themselves specify the rate or affinity of binding in every solution condition.[ref]
Calmodulin structure 1CLL in the Protein Data Bank. Experimental Data Snapshot and Primary Citation abstract
An original one-site model illustrates the distinction. If a site binds calcium independently with dissociation constant and free calcium concentration , the equilibrium occupied fraction isAt , half the sites are occupied; at , the fraction is . These values follow from the stipulated model and are not affinity measurements for PDB 1CLL.
EF hands commonly occur as interacting pairs, and atypical or altered relatives need not retain the same binding properties.[ref]
EF-hand calcium-binding domain signature and profile in PROSITE. Description: paired motifs, cooperativity and excluded nonbinding/atypical regions
Counting motifs alone therefore cannot justify treating every site as an identical independent binder. Structural arrangement, sequence chemistry and binding measurements provide complementary information. Electron density map 2026-11-05
An electron density map is a spatial reconstruction of electron density, typically displayed as a grid or contours. In X-ray crystallography, a beam scattered by a crystal produces a diffraction pattern: measured intensities constrain structure factor magnitudes, while crystallographic phases are also required for reconstruction. Coordinates and experimental data are combined in common model-assessment maps.[ref]
Electron Density Maps and Coefficient Files at RCSB PDB. Introduction, diffraction data, map coefficients and phases
With fractional crystallographic coordinates , integer Miller index vector and unit cell volume , an ideal Fourier reconstruction has the formHere the structure factors are complex Fourier coefficients. Finite data and uncertain phases limit the reconstructed detail; this is part of the phase problem, not simply an issue of drawing contours more finely.
An original one-dimensional example makes the phase information visible:Both profiles have the same Fourier coefficient magnitudes, but their maxima occur half a period apart. Squared magnitudes alone cannot distinguish them.
Equal Fourier magnitudes can give different density profiles
. Original one-dimensional profiles, with phase0 and phase for the first harmonic. Both have mean3 and first-harmonic coefficient magnitude1. They illustrate the phase problem, not measured crystallographic density. Details.An electron density map is also distinct from a macromolecular structural model fitted to it. A difference electron density map can highlight disagreement between observed and model-predicted scattering. Common map coefficients already incorporate information from the model, so the resulting map is not wholly independent confirmation of every modeling choice.[ref]
Electron Density Maps and Coefficient Files at RCSB PDB. Introduction, observed/calculated maps and difference maps
Florian Brueckner 2026-11-05
Florian Brueckner coauthored structural experiments on how RNA polymerase II moves along DNA during transcription. With Patrick Cramer, he prepared crystals containing an elongating enzyme complex in which states before and after movement could interconvert. Soaking the crystals with alpha-amanitin trapped a new arrangement interpreted as a possible intermediate. The resulting X-ray crystallography structure was refined at 3.4 angstrom resolution.[ref]
The entering DNA base lay above a displaced RNA polymerase bridge helix, while the RNA polymerase trigger loop adopted a wedged arrangement. The authors proposed that the inhibitor restricts movement of these parts, interfering with both nucleotide incorporation and advancement. This illustrates a productive use of inhibition: slowing a molecular machine can make otherwise transient arrangements accessible to structural measurement. The data support a mechanistic model, rather than providing a direct movie of every motion in a living biological cell.[ref]
Structural basis of transcription inhibition by alpha-amanitin and implications for RNA polymerase II translocation by Florian Brueckner and Patrick Cramer. abstract, bridge helix, trigger loop and proposed mechanism
Fumarase C 2026-11-05
Fumarase C, often designated FumC, is a classII form of fumarate hydratase. It catalyzes reversible hydration of fumarate to L-malate. The protein designation should be tied to an organism: Escherichia coli fumarase C is a well-studied species-specific example, while the broader enzyme-activity name does not specify one protein sequence.[ref]
Crystallographic studies of the catalytic and a second site in fumarase C from Escherichia coli by T. M. Weaver and others. Abstract: reaction and classII fumarase superfamily
The net substrate inventory makes the chemistry explicit:Four carbon atoms remain four; adding water changes hydrogen and oxygen content without changing the total charge. This hydration is chemically distinct from oxidation of L-malate to oxaloacetate. The enzyme accelerates a reversible reaction rather than making its net direction independent of conditions.[ref]
The1995 X-ray crystallography study of the E.coli enzyme resolved an assembly of four identical protein subunits at2.0Å. Its proposed active site involved contributions from three of the four protein subunits; a local catalytic environment therefore need not lie inside just one polypeptide chain. A1996 follow-up with bound compounds distinguished the catalytic A-site from a nearby second binding site. These experiments also show why observing ligand binding does not by itself identify a catalytic site.[ref]
The multisubunit active site of fumarase C from Escherichia coli by T. M. Weaver and others. Abstract: tetramer and multisubunit active site
[ref] Fumarate hydratase 2026-11-05
Fumarate hydratase, also called fumarase, is the enzyme that reversibly interconverts fumarate plus water with L-malate. The activity is EC4.2.1.2:In the hydration direction, water adds across the carbon-carbon double bond of fumarate. In the reverse direction, water is eliminated. Its lyase classification describes this transformation; the mere presence of water does not make the reaction hydrolysis.[ref]
Fumarate hydratase in IUBMB Enzyme Nomenclature. Reaction and accepted/other names
For an invented inventory, begin with ten micromoles of fumarate and let six micromoles undergo hydration. Four micromoles of fumarate remain and six micromoles of L-malate form. Each retains a four-carbon skeleton, so the counted carbon inventory remains micromoles of carbon atoms. The chosen extent does not determine chemical equilibrium or enzyme kinetics.
A 1995 X-ray crystallography study of Escherichia coli fumarase C found a four-subunit assembly at resolution. A competitive tungstate derivative helped locate the active site, which included atoms from three of the four protein subunits.[ref]
The multisubunit active site of fumarase C from Escherichia coli by T. M. Weaver and others. Abstract, tetrameric structure and multisubunit active-site assignment
The example shows why counting subunits and locating a catalytic site are different tasks: several chains can cooperate to build one local reaction environment.


