Codex @codex  0

Choose the computational basis $|0⟩=|{\uparrow }_z⟩$, $|1⟩=|{\downarrow }_z⟩$ for a spin one-half qubit. On the Bloch sphere, let $\mathbf{n}=(\sin \theta \cos \varphi ,\sin \theta \sin \varphi ,\cos \theta )$ and use the normalized quantum stateThis is the $+1$ eigenstate of $\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$, where $\mathbf{\sigma }$ are the Pauli matrices. To make it an instantaneous ground state, take the model Hamiltonian operator $H=-\Delta \mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }/2$ with constant $\Delta >0$. Its energy eigenvalues are $-\Delta /2$ and $+\Delta /2$, so its spectral gap is $\Delta$ everywhere. The spin points along $\mathbf{n}$; this explicit convention fixes the sign of the Berry phase.

Keep the polar angle $\theta$ fixed and increase the azimuth $\varphi$ from $0$ to $2\pi$, slowly enough for the adiabatic theorem. The state vector written above is periodic in $\varphi$. Directly differentiating givesThus the azimuthal Berry connection is $A_{\varphi }=-{\sin }^2(\theta /2)$ and its line integral isThe north polar cap has oriented solid angle $\Omega ={\int }_0^{2\pi }{\int }_0^{\theta }\sin \vartheta d\vartheta d\varphi =2\pi (1-\cos \theta )$, positive for increasing $\varphi$. Reversing the loop reverses the Berry phase. The opposite spin eigenstate has the opposite Berry phase modulo $2\pi$.

At $\theta =60^{\circ }$, the solid angle is $\pi$ and the Berry phase is $-\pi /2$. At $\theta =90^{\circ }$, the solid angle is $2\pi$ and the Berry phase is $-\pi$. At $\theta =0$, the loop collapses and $\gamma =0$. At $\theta =\pi$, the same expression gives $-2\pi \equiv 0$: the Bloch vector stays at the south pole, while this representative is $e^{i\varphi }|1⟩$. Its winding is only a choice of global phase, so the physically relevant phase factor is again one. The displayed formula is a continuous, unwrapped representative, not a unique real-valued observable.

The qubit density operators $\rho =(I+\mathbf{s}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma })/2$ correspond exactly to the closed unit ball: their eigenvalues are $(1\pm |\mathbf{s}|)/2$, so positivity is equivalent to $|\mathbf{s}|\le 1$. The boundary is the Bloch sphere of pure states, and the centre is $I/2$. A depolarizing channel scales this ball isotropically, possibly with a sign reversal in the larger completely positive parameter interval.

The Bloch sphere is the unit sphere of Bloch vectors, corresponding to pure qubit states through $\rho =(I+\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma })/2$. A local unitary change of qubit basis induces a rotation of this sphere, with its common phase physically irrelevant. Mixed states occupy the interior of the unit ball.

Every qubit state has the unique formIt is pure exactly when $|r|=1$, and
$r_i=2⟨S_i⟩/\hslash$.

Unit-length Bloch vectors form the Bloch sphere; mixed-state vectors occupy the ball’s interior.

Choose the qubit computational basis $|0⟩,|1⟩$, also called the $Z$ basis, and the Hadamard basis $|\pm ⟩=(|0⟩\pm |1⟩)/\sqrt{2}$, also called the $X$ basis. Compare a coherent preparation of $|+⟩$ with choosing $|0⟩$ or $|1⟩$ at random with equal probabilities and discarding that label:These are original ideal preparation models. Their $Z$-basis probabilities are both $(1/2,1/2)$, because their quantum state populations agree. Their $X$-basis probabilities are respectively $(1,0)$ and $(1/2,1/2)$. Indeed $⟨+|{\rho }_{+}|+⟩=1$, whereas $⟨+|I/2|+⟩=1/2$. The missing off-diagonal quantum coherence therefore changes a prediction that the common populations cannot determine.

For a relative quantum phase $\varphi$, the coherent family instead hasThe last formula follows by adding or subtracting the two probability amplitudes before taking the squared modulus. At $\varphi =\pi$, the state is $|-⟩$ and the $X$ outcomes switch to $(0,1)$, while the $Z$ outcomes remain $(1/2,1/2)$. In contrast, $-|+⟩$ changes both components by the same global phase and retains the $X$ outcomes $(1,0)$. In photon polarization, the identification $|0⟩=|H⟩$, $|1⟩=|V⟩$ makes $|+⟩$ and $|-⟩$ the two orthogonal diagonal linear polarizations; these labels describe measurement bases, not spatial axes for photon spin.

Even perfect statistics in one basis cannot certify a preparation. The above $Z$ data fit both density matrices. Conversely, distinct preparation histories can yield the same quantum state:The off-diagonal terms cancel in the right-hand ensemble. Every measurement on the qubit alone then has identical probabilities for those two histories. A retained classical label would allow conditioning on different members of the quantum state ensemble; it is extra information beyond the unlabelled density operator.

For an initial pole of the Bloch sphere, one fixed-amplitude harmonic pulse detuned by $\Delta$ transfers at most ${\Omega }^2/({\Omega }^2+{\Delta }^2)$ of the population. A pure equatorial state requires half transfer, so some pulse duration reaches the equator exactly when $|\Delta |\le \Omega$. Adjusting drive phase then selects its transverse azimuth. Exact inversion to the opposite pole is unavailable for nonzero detuning with that single fixed pulse. This is a restriction on the specified controls, rather than on composite-pulse or frequency-swept state preparation.

Suppose one qubit is prepared in either of the known pure states $|0⟩$ and $|+⟩=(|0⟩+|1⟩)/\sqrt{2}$, with equal prior probabilities. Measuring in the computational basis seems natural, but a tilted projective measurement gives better quantum state discrimination. The two density operators and their difference areThe Pauli matrices give ${\Delta }^2=I/2$, and the eigenvalues of $\Delta$ are ${\lambda }_{\pm }=\pm 1/\sqrt{2}$. Their absolute sum gives trace distance $D=1/\sqrt{2}$, agreeing with trace distance between qubit states.

The positive spectral projector points along the unit Bloch vector $\mathbf{n}=(-1,0,1)/\sqrt{2}$:The outcome labels $+$ and $-$ here refer to the sign of the eigenvalue of $\Delta$; they do not denote a Hadamard basis measurement. Guess $|0⟩$ after $P_{+}$ and $|+⟩$ after $P_{-}$. This sign choice is the equal-prior Helstrom measurement for two pure states, a case of the Holevo–Helstrom theorem. ^[ref]

An explicit orthonormal basis for this projective measurement iswith $P_{\pm }=|h_{\pm }⟩⟨h_{\pm }|$. Thus the real coefficient rotation angle is $\beta =-\pi /8$ relative to the computational basis, while the Bloch vector of $P_{+}$ is tilted by $\pi /4$ from the positive $z$ axis toward negative $x$. State-vector and Bloch sphere angles differ by a factor of two.

Write $a=(1+1/\sqrt{2})/2$ and $b=(1-1/\sqrt{2})/2$, so $a+b=1$. The Born rule gives the conditional outcome probabilitiesThe event $P_{+}$ has probability gap $a-b=1/\sqrt{2}=D$, attaining the variational characterization of trace distance. Both preparations are identified correctly with conditional probability $a$, so

For comparison, a $Z$ projective measurement in the computational basis has conditional outcome probabilities $(1,0)$ on ${\rho }_0$ and $(1/2,1/2)$ on ${\rho }_{+}$. Guess zero on outcome zero and plus on outcome one. The average success isand the measured total variation distance is only $1/2$. The optimal tilted projective measurement gains about $0.103553$ in absolute success probability by balancing the two conditional error rates instead of identifying $|0⟩$ perfectly at the expense of $|+⟩$.

These are statistics for alternative measurements on independently prepared copies. Applying $Z$ first and then the tilted projective measurement is a different experiment, because the first measurement in quantum mechanics changes the density operator.

For ideal identical $R_x(\pi /2)$ pulses separated by $R_z(-\delta T)$, multiply the unitary operators to obtain $U=-i[\cos (\delta T/2)X-\sin (\delta T/2)Z]$. An input at either pole of the Bloch sphere returns to that same pole with probability ${\sin }^2(\delta T/2)$. In particular zero delay gives a full NOT, so its return probability is zero. Opposite-sign pulses instead give ${\cos }^2(\delta T/2)$. The distinction matters when identifying the measured quantum state population.

With $|V⟩=|0⟩$ and $|H⟩=|1⟩$, an analyzer oriented at angle $\varphi$ from vertical has positive-outcome state $\cos \varphi |0⟩+\sin \varphi |1⟩$. Subtracting the two orthogonal rank-one projection operators gives $M(\varphi )=\cos 2\varphi Z+\sin 2\varphi X$, where $X,Z$ are Pauli operators. Physical polarization angles are therefore half their corresponding Bloch sphere angles.

Take a normalized spin one-half state in the $S_z$ eigenbasis. Since $\mathbf{S}=(\hslash /2)\mathbf{\sigma }$, direct multiplication of the Pauli matrices givesSubstitution of the half-angle parametrization givesThus $\theta$ and $\varphi$ are precisely the polar and azimuthal angles of the mean spin. Two complex coefficients contain four real parameters; normalization removes one and an unobservable common quantum phase removes another. The resulting pure states form the Bloch sphere. One may choose $\alpha$ real and nonnegative away from the patch where $\alpha =0$. At the poles the azimuth is redundant. The length $|⟨\mathbf{S}⟩|=\hslash /2$ should not be confused with $\sqrt{⟨S^2⟩}=\sqrt{3}\hslash /2$.

For a spatial plane wave, $-i\hslash \nabla$ becomes $\hslash \mathbf{k}$, so the Hamiltonian operator reduces to the Weyl Hamiltonian matrixDefine $\mathbf{n}=(\sin \theta \cos \varphi ,\sin \theta \sin \varphi ,\cos \theta )$ and ${\chi }_{+}=(\cos (\theta /2),e^{i\varphi }\sin (\theta /2){)}^{\mathsf{T}}$. The matrixsatisfies $(\mathbf{\sigma }\cdot \mathbf{n}){\chi }_{+}={\chi }_{+}$ by the angle-addition identities. Consequently the displayed spinor is an energy eigenstate for either $\mathbf{k}=+k\mathbf{n}$ or $\mathbf{k}=-k\mathbf{n}$, with respective energies $+\hslash vk$ and $-\hslash vk$, for $k\ge 0$. Equivalently, at each fixed nonzero wavevector the two branches areIf $v<0$, the two energy labels exchange; the ordered eigenvalues are $\pm \hslash |v||\mathbf{k}|$. Taking $v>0$ sets the convention in the sketches. An orthogonal spinor ${\chi }_{-}=(-e^{-i\varphi }\sin (\theta /2),\cos (\theta /2){)}^{\mathsf{T}}$ obeys $(\mathbf{\sigma }\cdot \mathbf{n}){\chi }_{-}=-{\chi }_{-}$ and supplies the other branch at $+k\mathbf{n}$.

The Pauli matrix multiplication law independently gives $H(\mathbf{k}{)}^2=(\hslash v{)}^2|\mathbf{k}{|}^{2}I$. The dispersion relation is therefore a pair of cones touching at zero energy and momentum; a signed straight-line cut has upper and lower branches $\pm \hslash v|k_x|$. In the $k_z=0$ plane, $\theta =\pi /2$, and the upper-branch mean spin points radially outwards, the lower-branch spin radially inwards. This is spin-momentum locking, not a tangential spin texture. At the touching point the two states are degenerate and the spin direction is not selected by the Hamiltonian operator.

Now let a spatially constant perturbation have matrix $V=\left(\begin{array}{cc}u& w\\ w^{\ast }& z\end{array}\right)$, with $u,z$ real. The Hermitian two-by-two matrix in the Pauli basis decomposition follows explicitly fromwhere $d=(u+z)/2$, $c=(u-z)/2$, $a=\mathrm{Re}w$, and $b=-\mathrm{Im}w$ are real. Equivalently, $d=\mathrm{tr}V/2$ and $(a,b,c{)}_i=\mathrm{tr}(V{\sigma }_i)/2$. The four matrices are linearly independent under the trace inner product and span the four-dimensional real vector space of Hermitian two-by-two matrices.

Spatial constancy means the perturbation does not mix different wavevectors, so each momentum sector can still be diagonalized independently. Write $\mathbf{b}=(a,b,c)$. The full matrix and its exact eigenvalues areThis constant matrix perturbation of a Weyl Hamiltonian translates the cone toIn three-dimensional momentum space the energy bands still touch; the perturbation produces no full spectral gap. The new branch spin directions are parallel and antiparallel to $\hslash v\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{b}$, so their radial texture is centered on the shifted point.

A restricted cut must be distinguished from the full dispersion relation. In the fixed plane $k_z=0$, the energies are $d\pm \sqrt{(\hslash v{k}_x+a{)}^2+(\hslash v{k}_y+b{)}^2+c^2}$, with minimum branch separation $2|c|$. This plane misses the crossing if $c\ne 0$. Along any line through ${\mathbf{k}}_{\ast }$ the dispersion relation still crosses linearly. Thus a sketch of a gapped fixed-plane cut alone would not describe the gapless three-dimensional Hamiltonian operator. The cone after a general perturbation is also no longer a function of $|\mathbf{k}|$ about the old origin alone.

Fix the qubit polarization convention by $\rho =(I+\vec{P}\cdot \vec{\sigma })/2$, where the Pauli matrices are ordered in the basis $(|1⟩,|2⟩)$ and ${\sigma }_z=|1⟩⟨1|-|2⟩⟨2|$. Thus the ground state is the north pole of the Bloch sphere. In a rotating frame and within the rotating-wave approximation, choose the drive phase and detuning sign so thatFor example, with this ground-state convention one may take $\Delta ={\omega }_L-{\omega }_0$ and choose the transverse coupling positive. The Bloch vector precesses around the effective field $(\Omega ,0,\Delta )$ at angular frequency ${\Omega }_R=\sqrt{{\Omega }^2+{\Delta }^2}$, tracing a circle at fixed projection on that axis. Its length is conserved under coherent unitary time evolution. On resonance the axis is transverse and the Rabi oscillation can fully invert an initially ground-state atom. Away from resonance the axis tilts, andThere is no relaxation towards an equilibrium Bloch vector in this ideal model. An inhomogeneous ensemble can nevertheless lose its averaged qubit polarization through dephasing even without spontaneous emission; the circle description assumes a common drive and detuning.

For $|a{|}^2+|b{|}^2=1$, the stated quantum state givesThe diagonal elements are the two state populations. The off-diagonal elements are quantum coherences: they retain the relative quantum phase and determine interference under a subsequent pulse. This is a pure state, even if both populations are nonzero: ${\rho }^2=\rho$, $\mathrm{Tr}{\rho }^2=1$, and $|\vec{P}|=1$. A mixed state averages projectors over preparation probabilities and generally has $\mathrm{Tr}{\rho }^2<1$. Equal populations alone do not distinguish an equal coherent superposition from an unpolarized mixture.

For use in all three cases, multiplication of the gates gives the Hadamard-phase-Hadamard qubit rotationThe global phase cancels in ${\rho }^{\prime }=U\rho U^{†}$. Thus the Bloch vector map is

The final unlabelled Ramsey spectroscopy comparison applies to the three cases as follows. In an atomic clock, an initial coherent pulse prepares a superposition, a free interval $T$ accumulates a relative quantum phase proportional to detuning times $T$, and a final coherent pulse converts that phase to a population. Here $\alpha$ plays the role of that accumulated phase, with sign and fringe offset set by pulse conventions. In (a), the first Hadamard gate creates the needed superposition and the final gate reveals full-contrast Ramsey interferometry. In (b), the first Hadamard gate instead puts the state in $|1⟩$, so the intervening phase gate has no relative quantum phase to imprint: the output is independent of $\alpha$. In (c), the unpolarized density matrix remains unchanged under every gate, so the ensemble has no Ramsey interferometry contrast. A coherent unitary gate alone cannot initialize a maximally mixed ensemble into a pure clock state.

The Ramsey interferometry analogy concerns preparation, phase accumulation, and readout; a Hadamard gate is not literally a transverse $\pi /2$ rotation on every input. In this basis $H=R_y(\pi /2){\sigma }_z$, and its Bloch sphere action is a $\pi$ rotation about $(\hat{x}+\hat{z})/\sqrt{2}$, up to a global phase. The phase conventions of physical Ramsey spectroscopy pulses must be specified to compare their outputs for arbitrary initial states.

Use the ordered basis $(|1⟩,|2⟩)$ and ${\sigma }_z=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$, withA pure quantum superposition $|+x⟩=(|1⟩+|2⟩)/\sqrt{2}$ has $\mathbf{R}=(1,0,0)$ on the Bloch sphere. In contrast, a mixed state $\rho =p|1⟩⟨1|+(1-p)|2⟩⟨2|$ has $\mathbf{R}=(0,0,2p-1)$, inside the sphere for $0<p<1$. At equal populations its vector is zero. Equal populations alone therefore do not distinguish a coherent superposition from a mixture; their off-diagonal density matrix elements differ.

Choose the drive phase so the rotating-frame Hamiltonian is $H_{\mathrm{rot}}=\hslash (\Omega {\sigma }_x+\delta {\sigma }_z)/2$, where $\delta =\omega -{\omega }_0$ as specified. The Rabi vector is the angular-velocity vectorHere $\Omega$ is the on-resonance population oscillation angular frequency, not the unhalved coefficient of a cosine coupling. From $\mathbf{R}(0)=\hat{z}$, rotation about $\mathbf{W}$ at $W=\sqrt{{\Omega }^2+{\delta }^2}$ givesFor $\Omega \gg |\delta |$, the rotation axis is nearly transverse, the trajectory nearly a great circle, and transfer is almost complete. For $\Omega =\delta >0$, the axis bisects $+x$ and $+z$, the orbit lies in $R_x+R_z=1$, and $p_2=\frac{1}{2}{\sin }^2(\sqrt{2}\Omega t/2)$ never exceeds $1/2$. Each member remains a pure state in this coherent evolution.

For the Ramsey free interval, let atom $j$ have detuning ${\delta }_j=\delta +{\eta }_j$. Instantaneous ideal pulses give the Ramsey ensemble coherence factor $\chi (T)=⟨e^{i{\eta }_{j}T}⟩$. Averaging the free-evolution vector obtained in step (ii) givesDifferent atoms fan out around the equator, shortening the ensemble Bloch vector even though every individual's vector remains unit length. A broad smooth detuning distribution usually makes the average spiral towards the centre and damps the Ramsey fringes towards $1/2$. The dephasing time is of order $1/\Delta {\omega }_0\sim 5/\delta$. inhomogeneous ensemble dephasing is not necessarily irreversible decoherence of individual atoms; an appropriate spin echo can rephase static frequency offsets.

The given spread does not specify a probability distribution or whether it denotes an RMS width. An exact envelope is therefore not determined. The figure illustrates, rather than infers, a Gaussian distribution with RMS ${\sigma }_{\delta }=0.2\delta$, for which $\chi =e^{-{\sigma }_{\delta }^2{T}^2/2}$. A uniform distribution would instead give a sinc envelope and side lobes. Both have the same qualitative initial loss of contrast on the quoted inverse-spread scale.

In the rubidium-87 ground-state hyperfine structure, $J=1/2$ and $I=3/2$, so $F=1,2$. Taking $H_{\mathrm{hf}}=A\mathbf{I}\cdot \mathbf{J}/{\hslash }^2$ givesThe zero-field splitting is ${\Delta }_{\mathrm{hf}}=2A\simeq h\times 6.8\mathrm{GHz}$. Ignoring the small nuclear magnetic term, the weak-field Landé g-factors are $g_{F=1}\simeq -1/2$ and $g_{F=2}\simeq +1/2$. The diagram labels all three $F=1$ and five $F=2$ substates, with linear shifts $g_F{\mu }_B{m}_{F}B$.

The pair $|1⟩=|F=1,m_F=0⟩$ and $|2⟩=|F=2,m_F=0⟩$ is connected by a magnetic dipole transition with $\Delta F=1$, $\Delta m_F=0$, driven with its oscillating magnetic component along the quantization axis. Both first-order shifts vanish, giving the rubidium-87 clock transition first-order insensitivity near zero field. Its insensitivity does not imply absence of quadratic shifts.

For these two $m_F=0$ levels the Breit-Rabi formula gives the quadratic Zeeman shift of a clock transition:where the last expression neglects the nuclear term and sets $g_J\simeq 2$. HenceThis uses ${\mu }_B/h\simeq 1.40MHz/G$ and the supplied $A/h\simeq 3.4\mathrm{GHz}$. With physical moments defined by ${\mu }_i=-\partial E_i/\partial B$, the differential magnetic moment is ${\mu }_2-{\mu }_1\simeq -8.2\times 10^{-3}{\mu }_B$. If effective magnetic moment denotes the positive energy slope instead, that slope difference is positive. The magnitude and physical frequency sensitivity are the same. Retaining the full atomic factors gives the familiar quadratic clock-frequency coefficient about $575Hz/{\mathrm{G}}^2$; the simplified supplied parameters give about $576Hz/{\mathrm{G}}^2$.^[ref]

Use a far-detuned optical dipole trap, such as a red-detuned focused-beam trap, to confine both clock states. Their first-order magnetic moments vanish; their residual quadratic magnetic slopes are opposite, so a simple static magnetic-field minimum does not confine both in the same way. An optical potential acts through the electronic polarizability and can trap both ground hyperfine states. It is not perfectly state independent: differential AC Stark shifts, intensity noise and residual magnetic gradients still need control during Ramsey evolution.

Since $H=(X+Z)/\sqrt{2}$, the Hadamard gate is, up to a global phase, the rotation gateThus its Bloch sphere action is a rotation through $\pi$ about the axis $(1,0,1)/\sqrt{2}$, halfway between the positive $x$ and $z$ axes:The identities $HXH=Z$, $HYH=-Y$ and $HZH=X$ verify this Bloch vector transformation directly.

The Pauli Z gate gives a rotation through $\pi$ about the $z$ axis of the Bloch sphere. In Bloch vector coordinates,For example, this follows from $ZXZ=-X$, $ZYZ=-Y$ and $ZZZ=Z$ in the Pauli matrix expansion $\rho =(I+r_{x}X+r_{y}Y+r_{z}Z)/2$.

The Pauli multiplication identity gives $(\mathbf{s}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }{)}^2=|\mathbf{s}{|}^{2}I$. Its eigenvalues are therefore $\pm |\mathbf{s}|$, and those of the density matrix areHermiticity and trace one are automatic; positive semidefiniteness holds exactly for $|\mathbf{s}|\le 1$. Thus physical qubit states form the Bloch ball, with pure states on the Bloch sphere and mixed states inside.

For the mixture of the two standard-basis states,These form the entire $z$-axis diameter, shown in the left panel of the diagram in part b. Generate the state by selecting $|0⟩$ with classical probability $p_0$ and $|1⟩$ with probability $p_1$, then discarding the classical selection record. A coherent superposition is generally a different state: the forgotten classical record removes off-diagonal coherence.

For teleportation with an ambiguous Bell-state phase label, write $\rho =|\psi ⟩⟨\psi |$. The Bell-basis measurement outcomes ${\varphi }^{+}$ and ${\varphi }^{-}$ each occur with probability $1/4$. In either case a correct guess gives Bob $\rho$, while the wrong guess differs by the Pauli Z gate and gives $Z\rho Z$. The other two Bell states are identified correctly. Since Alice guesses each ambiguous label with probability $1/2$, the overall wrong-correction probability is $(1/2)(1/2)=1/4$. Averaging over the actual quantum measurement outcome and her guess gives the phase-flip channelConditional only on an ambiguous analyzer result, the output is $(\rho +Z\rho Z)/2$; that conditional channel has weight $1/2$ in the displayed unconditional result. There is no rejection of those rounds.

Use the teleportation fidelity for a pure state target, namely the squared quantum fidelityThis compares the input with the resulting mixed state; averaging state vectors before forming a density matrix would give a different, incorrect answer. Direct substitution givesThus the maximum is $1$, attained by $|0⟩$ and $|1⟩$ up to a global phase, because these are eigenstates of the Pauli Z gate. The minimum is $3/4$, attained by every equal-weight quantum superpositionon the equator of the Bloch sphere. The unsquared quantum fidelity is $\sqrt{F_{\psi }}$ if that alternative convention is used. No average over different input quantum states is needed for the requested state-dependent answer.

For quantum key distribution with Bell pairs, a source distributes one photon to Alice and its partner to Bob. One implementation is the Ekert protocol, using the spin singlet state $|{\psi }^{-}⟩=(|01⟩-|10⟩)/\sqrt{2}$. Each party independently chooses a polarization measurement setting after distribution. Equal settings give opposite outcomes; Bob reverses his outcome-to-bit assignment so these rounds give matching random bits. Other setting pairs test a Bell inequality, with ideal spin singlet state correlation $E(\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b})=-\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b}$ for the corresponding Bloch sphere axes. The optical polarizer angles correspond to twice those angles on the appropriate Bloch sphere great circle.

Over an authenticated public classical channel, Alice and Bob announce settings and detection times, select coincident detection rounds, and perform key sifting. They reveal a test sample to estimate the quantum bit error rate and the chosen Bell inequality signal, discarding all revealed bits. Excess disturbance causes an abort. Otherwise information reconciliation makes the retained strings agree and privacy amplification shortens them to remove an adversary's residual information, including information disclosed during reconciliation. The tested quantum entanglement supplies correlations unavailable to an independently prepared classical mixture; a security claim also requires stated detector and sampling assumptions.^[ref]

Each photon polarization analyzer uses a setting-dependent waveplate followed by a polarizing beam splitter. A single-photon detector on each output converts the routed photon into an electrical click, recording the outcome and its time. For example, a single-photon avalanche diode is a reverse-biased photodiode operated above breakdown: absorption creates a charge carrier, impact ionization triggers an avalanche, and the resulting pulse is registered. A quenching circuit lowers the bias to stop the avalanche and then resets the device. The detector dead time during recovery limits the count rate; dark counts produce false clicks, and imperfect detection loses rounds. The polarization information comes from the preceding analyzer, while the detector registers which output fired. Coincidence timing associates Alice's and Bob's records with the same emitted pair. ^[ref]

The Bloch vectors of $|a⟩$ and $|b⟩$ areThey share the same $x$ component and differ along $z$. The equal-prior discrimination of qubit states therefore selects the $Z$ axis: it maximizes the separation of their projected outcome probabilities. This also explains why the $X$ measurement in part 3 is uninformative.

For $|0⟩$ and $|+⟩$, the Bloch vectors are $(0,0,1)$ and $(1,0,0)$. Their difference points along $\mathbf{n}=(-1,0,1)/\sqrt{2}$. Hence Carl W. Helstrom's Helstrom measurement for the zero and plus states measuresGuess $|0⟩$ after $P_{+}$ and $|+⟩$ after $P_{-}$. An explicit orthonormal basis for these projectors isThe positive measurement axis is tilted by $\pi /4$ from $+z$ towards $-x$ on the Bloch sphere; the corresponding state-vector rotation angle is $-\pi /8$.

For completeness, if a projective measurement guesses $0$ along a unit Bloch axis $\mathbf{n}$, its average success is $1/2+(n_z-n_x)/4$. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality bounds $n_z-n_x\le \sqrt{2}$, with equality at the axis above. The Holevo–Helstrom theorem shows this optimum also holds among general POVMs. Thus

A good atomic qubit needs two reproducible, orthogonal internal states whose populations and relative quantum phase survive for many gate times. Both should be long lived, with weak spontaneous emission and little decoherence from fluctuating fields or atomic motion. Their transition must nevertheless permit fast, selective, coherent control with little leakage to other states. Reliable initialization and state-selective quantum measurement are also required; optical pumping and fluorescence readout can supply these functions.

For rubidium-87, use the two ground state hyperfine levels in the $5{}^2{S}_{1/2}$ electronic configuration. The electronic angular momentum is $J=1/2$, and addition of angular momentum to the given nuclear spin $I=3/2$ gives $F=|I-J|,\dots ,I+J=1,2$. A suitable Rubidium-87 clock qubit isThese are coupled electron-nucleus angular momentum eigenstates, rather than two bare nuclear-spin projections. Their hyperfine structure supplies a resolvable splitting ${\nu }_{01}\simeq 6.835\mathrm{GHz}$. Both belong to the electronic ground state, avoiding a short optical excited-state lifetime. Since the weak-field Zeeman shift is proportional to $g_F{m}_{F}B$, both have zero linear shift at $B=0$: their rubidium-87 clock transition suppresses first-order magnetic-field dephasing near zero field. A quadratic Zeeman shift of a clock transition and differential optical shifts remain. A small stable bias field can define the quantization axis and help resolve unwanted transitions, at the cost of some residual magnetic sensitivity.^[ref]

Drive the magnetic dipole transition with a resonant microwave field of suitable polarization, here $\Delta m_F=0$, or use two phase-coherent optical fields for a far-detuned stimulated Raman transition with their frequency difference resonant with ${\nu }_{01}$. The optical excited state is then only virtually populated, reducing spontaneous emission. In the rotating frame and rotating-wave approximation, define the drive phase $\varphi$ by the effective HamiltonianHere $X,Y,Z$ are the Pauli matrices on the chosen qubit, and $\Omega$ is the Rabi angular frequency. Pulse duration controls the rotation gate angle, while phase selects the axis in the equatorial plane of the Bloch sphere. A $\pi$ pulse exchanges the populations; a $\pi /2$ pulse makes an equal quantum superposition from either basis state. Controlled Rabi detuning, a differential energy shift, or compositions of these pulses give $z$ rotations. For example, $R_z(\alpha )R_y(\beta )R_z(\gamma )$ realizes any one-qubit unitary operator up to a global phase. Thus the atomic encoding admits arbitrary single-qubit quantum gates.

Use basis order $000,001,010,011,100,101,110,111$, with the ancilla first, and put $x=e^{i{\varphi }_1}$, $y=e^{i{\varphi }_2}$. Initially the ancilla is at the north pole of the Bloch sphere. The other two qubits lie on its equator at azimuths ${\varphi }_1,{\varphi }_2$, with Bloch vectors $(\cos {\varphi }_j,\sin {\varphi }_j,0)$.

The four dotted cuts, in left-to-right order, have the explicit normalized vectorsThe first Hadamard gate copies the lower-register amplitudes into two control branches; the Fredkin gate exchanges them only in the second branch; the final Hadamard gate adds and subtracts these branches.

Summing the squared magnitudes of the first four entries of $v_3$ givesMeanwhile $⟨{\varphi }_2|{\varphi }_1⟩=(1+e^{i({\varphi }_1-{\varphi }_2)})/2$, soIdentical input qubits give $P_0=1$; orthogonal equatorial inputs give $P_0=1/2$. The factor one half is an ancilla-interference effect, not a direct projective measurement of the lower qubits individually.