Helium-3 superfluid discovery experiment 2026-10-18
David Morris Lee, Douglas Dean Osheroff and Robert Coleman Richardson compressed coexisting liquid and solid helium-3 in a cell precooled by a dilution refrigerator. Helium-4 pressure drove coupled bellows and a piston; a capacitance diaphragm gauge read pressure and platinum nuclear magnetic resonance supplied thermometry. Uniform compression revealed a slope break A and a small pressure drop B; decompression and varied solid fraction checked reproducibility. Their April 1972 paper, Evidence for a New Phase of Solid He3, interpreted a new solid phase, without establishing liquid superfluidity. [ref]
Evidence for a New Phase of Solid He3 by Douglas Dean Osheroff and others. 1972, pp.885–888, Figs.1–3
The October follow-up replaced the thermometer assembly with a sample nuclear magnetic resonance coil. An applied magnetic field gradient selected different sample layers, separating strong solid signals from the liquid background. At A the liquid resonance shifted; at B its shift disappeared and its magnetic susceptibility fell. Removing the gradient resolved the frequency shift directly. Independence from solid fraction and distinct relaxation times supported the liquid assignment. Thus the reinterpretation rested on phase-selective evidence, rather than relabeling the first paper's title. These magnetic observations identify changed liquid phases; they do not directly measure frictionless flow. [ref]
New Magnetic Phenomena in Liquid He3 below 3 mK by Douglas Dean Osheroff and others. 1972, pp.920–923, Figs.1–3
Douglas Dean Osheroff recalls the subsequent p-wave interpretation. [ref]
Superfluidity in 3He: Discovery and Understanding by Douglas Dean Osheroff. 1996 lecture, p.73
Compression and independent readout channels in the helium-3 superfluid discovery experiment
. Original functional diagram, not a reconstruction to scale. Left: drive, sample and pressure channel. Right: separate thermometer and sample nuclear magnetic resonance configurations; the latter replaces the former in the follow-up. Connections indicate function, not historical wiring. Details.The inference has a useful limit. A pressure anomaly in two coexisting phases cannot, by itself, identify which phase changed: both contribute to the common phase coexistence curve. Thermometer lag, a temperature gradient or slow equilibration can also separate indicated temperature from the sample state. Correlating another response with the anomaly provides information that repeating the same pressure trace cannot supply. Conversely, a shifted magnetic resonance alone does not measure a frictionless flow rate.
Martinis-Devoret-Clarke circuit experiments 2026-10-18
The 1985 spectroscopy experiment used niobium-based tunnel Josephson junctions on silicon, thermally anchored with final bias low-pass filters to a dilution refrigerator. Calibrated germanium and cobalt thermometers measured temperature. A filtered coaxial cable injected microwaves; repeated switches to nonzero electric potential difference measured escape with irradiation on and off. Bias scans at fixed microwave frequency resolved separate enhancements matching calculated unequal energy level spacings. Raising temperature merged the structure toward classical response. Junction parameters were calibrated in the classical regime; reducing the superconducting critical current with a magnetic field checked thermal readout. Parameter uncertainties limited absolute resonance positions.[ref]
Energy-Level Quantization in the Zero-Voltage State of a Current-Biased Josephson Junction by John M. Martinis and others. Original paper, pp.1543–1545, apparatus and Figs.2–4; p.1546, numerical boundary condition
The companion escape experiment mounted a tunnel Josephson junction on an attenuating coaxial cable, cold-anchored its bias filters, ramped the electric current, and counted switches to nonzero electric potential difference. Rapid current shutoff limited heating. Classical escape and microwave resonance calibrated the superconducting critical current, capacitance and environmental loading. Low-temperature escape agreed with the quantum prediction using these calibrated parameters. A magnetic field reduced the superconducting critical current to keep the same apparatus thermally activated at lower temperature, testing excess noise. Frequency-dependent loading contributed uncertainty; the predicted damping correction was smaller than combined errors, so the experiment did not resolve that correction.[ref]
Measurements of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling out of the Zero-Voltage State of a Current-Biased Josephson Junction by Michel H. Devoret and others. Original paper, pp.1909–1910, calibration, Fig.2 noise control and dissipation limit
Together these tests connect spectral structure and escape of the same kind of collective coordinate. They do not constitute a demonstration of coherent gate operations on a qubit, or prove that every macroscopic coordinate retains quantum behavior under arbitrary environmental coupling. The attraction is more concrete: a fabricated electrical circuit admits both an independently measurable classical model and quantitative quantum tests of its phase dynamics.
Past exam of the physics B course of the University of Cambridge 2018 Paper 2 Section C C13 Solution 2026-10-18
Entropy at absolute zero. The Third law of thermodynamics concerns the low-temperature limit of equilibrium states. In the zero-entropy formulation, the entropy of a perfect crystal with a nondegenerate ground state tends to zero as . The statistical interpretation is : a unique accessible ground state has . The entropy-difference formulation of the Third law of thermodynamics states that entropy differences associated with regular changes of mechanical parameters tend to zero as absolute zero is approached. These statements require equilibrium and appropriate ground-state assumptions; a frozen disordered material or a degenerate ground state can carry residual entropy.
For a phase of fixed composition and pressure,A finite limiting entropy constrains this integral. Ordinary equilibrium heat capacities therefore vanish as temperature approaches zero, with familiar examples for three-dimensional acoustic phonons and for a normal degenerate Fermi liquid. A constant positive heat capacity extrapolated to zero would give a logarithmically divergent entropy difference and is impossible in this regime. Discontinuous transitions and anomalous limits need separate treatment rather than extending a high-temperature approximation indefinitely.
Gibbs free energy. For fixed particle numbers,Thus, when , the Gibbs free energy approaches its zero-temperature value with a horizontal tangent:The equality uses the enthalpy ; neither limiting value needs to be zero. The low-temperature Gibbs free-energy expansion makes the approach quantitative. For with and ,The second derivative is , although it need not tend to zero. For a reaction between such equilibrium phases, , and and approach one another. If a genuine residual entropy is retained instead, has limiting slope . A horizontal tangent cannot be asserted without the zero-entropy condition.
Why helium remains a liquid. Helium atoms attract each other weakly and are exceptionally light. Their zero-point energy is large compared with the binding that would localize them in a solid. Both helium-4 and helium-3 can therefore remain liquid down to the lowest temperatures at low pressure; substantial applied pressure is needed to solidify them. This is not a violation of the third law. A quantum liquid can have a unique low-entropy ground state, and zero-point motion does not itself imply thermal entropy. The third law does not require every substance to crystallize at atmospheric pressure.
A helium-4 atom has integer spin zero and is a boson. Below the lambda point near at saturated vapor pressure, its liquid is superfluid. Its strong interactions mean that it is not quantitatively an ideal Bose gas, and the condensate fraction need not equal the superfluid fraction. The two-fluid model of superfluidity separates an entropy-carrying normal component of a superfluid from the superfluid component, whose entropy is zero. At sufficiently low temperature the dominant thermal excitations are acoustic phonons: their linear dispersion in three dimensions gives , and . Higher-energy rotons are exponentially suppressed. Thus the normal component of a superfluid and entropy disappear as , while superfluid flow and quantum motion can persist.
A helium-3 atom has spin and is a fermion. Well below its Fermi temperature, but above its superfluid transition, liquid helium-3 is a degenerate interacting Fermi liquid. Only quasiparticles close to the Fermi surface are thermally excited, giving and . At temperatures of order a millikelvin, helium-3 also becomes superfluid through formation of Cooper pairs of fermions. This is not Bose-Einstein condensation of individual helium-3 atoms. Pairing reorganizes the low-energy excitation spectrum; in the fully gapped bulk B phase, the fermionic quasiparticle contribution to heat capacity is exponentially suppressed at temperatures well below the pairing gap. Gapless collective modes can still give thermal terms following a power law. The entropy nevertheless tends to zero. The normal Fermi-liquid law cannot be extrapolated through its pairing transition unchanged.[ref]
The Extraordinary Phases of Liquid 3He by David Morris Lee. 1996 Nobel lecture, discussion of helium isotopes and paired superfluid phases
Helium-3 also illustrates the importance of nuclear spin entropy. Over an intermediate low-temperature range, localized spins in the solid can retain approximately of entropy per atom, while the degenerate liquid has much less. Reversible conversion of liquid to the higher-entropy solid then absorbs heat; adiabatic compression along the melting curve can cool the sample. This is Pomeranchuk cooling. At still lower temperature, interactions between the nuclear spins remove this nearly free-spin entropy, so a constant cannot be extrapolated to absolute zero.[ref]
The Pomeranchuk Effect by Robert Coleman Richardson. 1996 Nobel lecture, entropy comparison and compression cooling
Liquefaction and cooling methods. A gas must be below its liquid-gas critical point to form a distinct liquid phase by compression. Compression above the critical temperature alone cannot achieve ordinary liquid-vapour coexistence. Practical liquefaction removes the compression heat, cools the compressed gas in a heat exchanger and uses expansion to lower its temperature further.
A throttling valve operates approximately at constant specific enthalpy when kinetic-energy changes and heat leakage are negligible. The Joule-Thomson coefficient isusing consistent molar quantities, or consistent total quantities for a fixed amount. A pressure drop cools the gas if . An ideal gas has zero Joule-Thomson coefficient; real intermolecular interactions are essential. In particular, room-temperature helium warms on throttling, so it must first be brought into a region of positive Joule-Thomson coefficient. Expansion through an engine or turbine can instead remove work and produce approximately isentropic cooling.
A regenerative liquefier sends the cold returning gas through a counterflow heat exchanger to precool the incoming compressed gas before its next expansion. Expansion engines and external precooling can supply the initial cooling; repeated operation then produces liquid. Modern helium liquefaction commonly combines work-producing expansion with a final throttle. [ref]
https://trc.nist.gov/cryogenics/Papers/Review/2020-Review_of_Refrigeration_Methods.pdf. Review of Refrigeration Methods, helium liquefiers and Claude cycles
Once liquid exists, pumping away vapour lowers its saturation pressure and boiling temperature. The escaping vapour carries latent heat away, cooling the remaining liquid. At still lower temperatures, a dilution refrigerator exploits the different entropy carried by helium-3 in concentrated and dilute helium mixtures; adiabatic demagnetization and Pomeranchuk cooling provide other routes.
Approaching zero. The unattainability formulation of the third law states that regular cooling operations with finite resources cannot reach absolute zero in finitely many stages. As the entropy available to remove becomes small and thermal couplings weaken, each method loses its ability to take the final step. An isentropic cooling trajectory starting at nonzero entropy cannot reach a common zero-entropy endpoint through regular finite changes of parameters. A fully general finite-time claim also requires assumptions about available controls and heat-transfer rates. Quantum liquids and refrigeration methods can approach while remaining consistent with vanishing equilibrium entropy; they do not provide a finite-operation route to absolute zero.
Quantronium Ramsey interference experiment 2026-10-18
The 2002 experiment described in Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit demonstrates Ramsey interferometry in a circuit using superconductivity. An aluminum island between two small Josephson junctions and a larger readout Josephson junction formed the loop; a dilution refrigerator cooled it. Manipulation used the charge/flux bias point least sensitive to first-order fluctuations. Microwave pulse amplitude and duration were calibrated using Rabi oscillations. Two phase-coherent pulses then enclosed a variable free interval. A current pulse switched the large Josephson junction to finite voltage with state-dependent probability; a preamplifier and threshold discriminator counted repeated trials.[ref]
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit by Denis Vion and others. Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit, PDF pp. 1–4, Fig. 1 and Fig. 3; pulse calibration immediately following Fig. 3
As a readout control, switching was tested against pulse height at thermal equilibrium. The Ramsey interferometry oscillation period agreed with inverse frequency detuning, supporting relative quantum phase accumulation against the external oscillator. The decaying envelope indicated finite quantum coherence, while reduced contrast was attributed provisionally to population relaxation during readout. This supports controlled coherent evolution over a finite interval, without establishing perfect isolation or identifying one exclusive noise mechanism.[ref]
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit by Denis Vion and others. Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit, PDF p. 2 readout test; Fig. 3B and PDF p. 4 Ramsey fringes and contrast discussion
