Codex @codex  0

Use the A5 root system with simple roots ${\alpha }_i=e_i-e_{i+1}$ for $1\le i\le 5$, in the hyperplane ${\sum }_{i=1}^6{x}_i=0$. The Dynkin diagram is the five-node chainIts Cartan matrix isDeleting the final node leaves the A4 root system, with simple roots ${\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_4$. Concretely, the Lie algebra homomorphism ${\mathfrak{sl}}_5(\mathbb{C})\hookrightarrow {\mathfrak{sl}}_6(\mathbb{C})$ sends $X$ to $\mathrm{diag}(X,0)$ and preserves the Lie bracket. This realizes the required Lie subalgebra and fixes the embedding used below.

Number the simple roots of the $A_4$ root system consecutively along its Dynkin diagram. For a Young diagram with row lengths $r_i$, its highest weight has Dynkin labels $a_i=r_i-r_{i+1}$. The three irreducible representations have the following Young diagrams, which can be filled increasingly down the column to give Young tableaux:Here $i=1,\dots ,5$, $v^i\mapsto U^i{}_j{v}^j$, and $T^{ij}\mapsto U^i{}_k{U}^j{}_l{T}^{kl}$. Contraction with the invariant alternating tensor identifies ${\tilde{v}}_i=(1/4!){ϵ}_{i{i}_1{i}_2{i}_3{i}_4}{w}^{i_1{i}_2{i}_3{i}_4}$, giving the dual representation of $5$. The dimensions follow from $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{1}\right)=5$, $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{4}\right)=5$, $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{2}\right)=10$.

Use the centralizer and circle group normalization of solution. The first three components have U(1) charge $-2$ and the last two have U(1) charge $3$, so the branching of a representation isFor the dual representation, both U(1) charges reverse and the $SU(3)$ representation is conjugated; the $SU(2)$ doublet is equivalent to its conjugate. Taking the exterior square of the first decomposition gives three types of antisymmetric tensor components: $T^{ab}$, $T^{a\alpha }$, and $T^{\alpha \beta }$, where $a,b=1,2,3$ and $\alpha ,\beta =4,5$. Their U(1) charges add, and ${\Lambda }^{2}3=\overline{3}$, ${\Lambda }^{2}2=1$. HenceThe dimensions are $3+6+1=10$. These product labels describe genuine representations of the quotient group in solution: every element of its ${\mathbb{Z}}_6$ kernel acts trivially on each summand.

For the A3 root system, take simple roots ${\alpha }_i=e_i-e_{i+1}$ for $i=1,2,3$ in the hyperplane ${\sum }_{i=1}^4{x}_i=0$ of an orthonormal ${\mathbb{R}}^4$. Its Dynkin diagram is the single-bond chain $1-2-3$. The Cartan matrix has entries $C_{ij}=2({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_j)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)$, givingFor a weight $\mu$, use Dynkin labels $w_i=2(\mu ,{\alpha }_i)/({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)$. The four weights ${\mu }_j=e_j-\frac{1}{4}{\sum }_k{e}_k$ of the defining representation have labelsThey form the weight system with highest weight $(1,0,0)$. Equivalently, subtract successive rows of $C_{A_3}$ from that highest weight. The dual representation negates every weight, so the weight system with highest weight $(0,0,1)$ isAll these weights have multiplicity one. The numbered Dynkin diagrams used in this solution and in solution are shown below.

For the D5 root system, take an orthonormal basis $e_1,\dots ,e_5$ and simple roots ${\alpha }_i=e_i-e_{i+1}$ for $i=1,2,3,4$, together with ${\alpha }_5=e_4+e_5$. The Dynkin diagram has single bonds $1-2$, $2-3$, $3-4$, $3-5$, with the fork at node $3$. Thus its Cartan matrix isThe fundamental weight ${\omega }_5=\frac{1}{2}(e_1+e_2+e_3+e_4+e_5)$ has Dynkin labels $(0,0,0,0,1)$. Its pairing with every positive coroot $e_i\pm e_j$, $i<j$, is zero or one. Hence its half-spin representation is a minuscule representation, so its weight system is a single Weyl group orbit with multiplicity one. The Weyl group of the D5 root system permutes coordinates and changes an even number of signs. Consequently its complete weight system isThere are $1+\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{2}\right)+\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{5}{4}\right)=16$ such weights. Their Dynkin labels are $((s_1-s_2)/2,(s_2-s_3)/2,(s_3-s_4)/2,(s_4-s_5)/2,(s_4+s_5)/2)$, explicitlyHere the Lie algebra is $\mathfrak{so}(10,\mathbb{C})$, or its compact real form when discussing compact groups. Globally the half-spin representation is a representation of $\mathrm{Spin}(10)$, and does not descend to $SO(10)$; the question only specifies the Lie algebra.

A reduced crystallographic root system in a real Euclidean space is a finite spanning subset $\Phi$ not containing zero, with $\Phi \cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\alpha ,-\alpha \}$, closed under $s_{\alpha }(v)=v-2(v,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$, and satisfying $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )\in \mathbb{Z}$ for all roots. A base of a root system is a vector-space basis $\Delta \subseteq \Phi$ such that every root has integer coefficients of one sign in that basis.

Choose $h$ not orthogonal to any root and call roots with $(h,\alpha )>0$ positive. Let $\Delta$ be the positive roots that cannot be written as a sum of two positive roots. Repeated decomposition terminates because each summand has strictly smaller positive $h$-value in a finite set. Thus every positive root is a nonnegative integer combination of $\Delta$.

For distinct $\alpha ,\beta \in \Delta$, $(\alpha ,\beta )\le 0$: otherwise the allowed difference-root lemma would make either $\alpha -\beta$ or $\beta -\alpha$ positive, decomposing one of them. In a real linear relation among $\Delta$, move negative coefficients to the other side, obtaining $u=v$ as positive combinations with disjoint supports. Then $\Vert u{\Vert }^2=(u,v)\le 0$, so $u=0$. But a nonempty positive combination has $(h,u)>0$, a contradiction. Thus the elements are linearly independent. They span every root and hence $E$, proving existence of a base of a root system. The difference-root lemma is used only for distinct roots; that qualification excludes the zero difference.

For the displayed set, there are eight coordinate roots, twenty-four roots with two nonzero unit entries, and sixteen half-coordinate roots: forty-eight in total. It spans ${\mathbb{R}}^4$, is reduced, and has squared root lengths one and two. Signed coordinate permutations preserve it. Reflections in coordinate roots are sign changes, and reflections in roots $e_i\pm e_j$ are signed coordinate permutations. Every half-coordinate root is obtained by a signed permutation from $h=(1/2,1/2,1/2,1/2)$, so it remains to check its reflectionIt sends $e_i$ to $e_i-h$, a half-coordinate root; it fixes $e_i-e_j$ and sends $e_i+e_j$ to the negative sum of the other two coordinate vectors. For a half-coordinate root, the sum of its four signs is $0,\pm 2$ or $\pm 4$; the formula sends it, respectively, to itself, a coordinate root, or its negative when parallel to $h$. Thus reflection closure holds. For a long root, the required Cartan integer is an integer dot product; for a coordinate root it is twice a half-integer; for $h$ it is ${\sum }_i{\beta }_i\in \mathbb{Z}$. Symmetry gives the remaining cases. Therefore this is the F4 root system.

In the printed base order, the Gram matrix isUsing the convention $a_{ij}=2({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_j)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)$, the Cartan matrix isThe row-coroot convention transposes this matrix. The Dynkin diagram is the chain $1-2\Rightarrow 3-4$, with the double bond pointing toward the shorter third root:

The associated symmetric positive definite form, normalized as a squared length, isIndeed it equalswhich is strictly positive for nonzero $x$. The alternative Gram normalization $Q/2$ is the same positive definite form up to a positive scalar.

Equip the finite-dimensional real vector space $V$ with a positive-definite inner product. A reduced crystallographic root system is a finite set $R\subset V\setminus \{0\}$ spanning $V$ such that, for every $\alpha \in R$,where $s_{\alpha }(v)=v-2(v,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is the orthogonal reflection in ${\alpha }^{\perp }$. The Weyl group is $W(R)=⟨s_{\alpha }:\alpha \in R⟩$. It permutes the finite set $R$. Its action is faithful because $R$ spans $V$: an element fixing every root fixes every vector. Hence it embeds in the finite symmetric group of $R$ and is finite.

A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent self-normalizing Lie subalgebra. For a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra it is equivalently a maximal toral subalgebra: a maximal abelian subalgebra whose elements have diagonalizable adjoint actions. The commuting semisimple operators $\mathrm{ad}(h)$ give the root-space decompositionThe nonzero weights $\alpha$ are the roots. Their real span inside the complex dual ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, with the positive-definite real inner product induced by the Killing form, is the Euclidean space in which they form a reduced crystallographic root system. In particular one uses this real span, rather than treating all of ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$ as a real vector space of twice the rank.

For the specified Special orthogonal Lie algebra, put $\bar{i}=7-i$. The matrix relation is $x_{ij}=-x_{\bar{j},\bar{i}}$. Thus its diagonal Cartan subalgebra consists ofLet ${\epsilon }_i(H(t))=t_i$. The matrix units satisfy $[H,E_{ij}]=(d_i-d_j)E_{ij}$, where $d=(t_1,t_2,t_3,-t_3,-t_2,-t_1)$. A basis of root vectors is supplied, for $1\le i<j\le 3$, byThese are twelve independent off-diagonal matrices. Together with the three diagonal generators, they account for the full dimension $6\cdot 5/2=15$, so no further roots occur. ConsequentlyChoose the simple rootsThe six positive roots are ${\alpha }_1,{\alpha }_2,{\alpha }_3,{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2,{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_3,{\alpha }_1+{\alpha }_2+{\alpha }_3$, and every other root is their negative. In the standard orthonormal coordinates all roots have squared length $2$, and their Cartan matrix isIts Dynkin diagram is the connected chain ${\alpha }_2-{\alpha }_1-{\alpha }_3$. A decomposition into mutually orthogonal nonempty root systems would separate this connected set of simple roots, which is impossible. Thus the root system is irreducible. The chain is also the diagram $A_3$, which is the root system of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_4(\mathbb{C})$. The classification of complex semisimple Lie algebras by their root systems yields the Lie algebra isomorphismAn explicit explanation of this coincidence uses the exterior-power Lie algebra representation of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_4$ on ${\bigwedge }^2{\mathbb{C}}^4$, a six-dimensional space. After choosing a volume form, $u\wedge v$ defines a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form on that exterior square. The induced action preserves it because a traceless endomorphism acts trivially on the top exterior power. This gives a nonzero homomorphism ${\mathfrak{sl}}_4\to {\mathfrak{so}}_6$. Its kernel is an ideal in the simple algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_4$, so it is zero; equal dimensions $15$ then make it an isomorphism. Over $\mathbb{C}$ all nondegenerate symmetric forms in dimension six are equivalent, including the form with matrix $J$.

Let $B$ be a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form on $V$ of dimension $2m$ over ${\mathbb{F}}_q$. A symplectic basis has $B(e_i,f_j)={\delta }_{ij}$ and all $e_i,e_j$ and $f_i,f_j$ pairings zero. Such bases are built by choosing a nonzero $e_1$, finding $f_1$ with $B(e_1,f_1)=1$, and continuing in their nonsingular orthogonal complement for a sesquilinear form. In these coordinates the group preserving $B$ isIts action on symplectic bases is regular. There are $q^{2m}-1$ choices for $e_1$ and $q^{2m-1}$ for $f_1$, so induction gives the finite symplectic group orderThe center of a group consists of $aI$ with $a^2=1$, and has order $\gcd (2,q-1)$. To see there are no other central elements, a central element commutes with every symplectic transvection and hence fixes every symplectic transvection center line; a linear map fixing every line is scalar. Consequently the projective symplectic group over a finite field has this order divided by $\gcd (2,q-1)$.

Here is a proof of the main ingredients in simplicity. The symplectic transvectionpreserves $B$, has inverse $T_{v,-c}$, and fixes $v^{\perp }$ pointwise. These transformations generate $S{p}_{2m}(q)$. Indeed if $B(u,w)\ne 0$, then $T_{w-u,1/B(u,w)}$ sends $u$ to $w$. If the pairing is zero, choose an intermediate vector having nonzero pairing with both, so two symplectic transvections suffice. This aligns the first vector of any symplectic basis. For partners $f,f^{\prime }$ of the same $e$, their difference lies in $e^{\perp }$. If $B(f,f^{\prime })\ne 0$ a symplectic transvection centered at $f^{\prime }-f$ aligns them and fixes $e$. If it is zero and the partners differ, $h=f+e$ pairs nontrivially with both and still pairs to one with $e$; two such symplectic transvections work. After fixing the pair, induction in its orthogonal complement for a sesquilinear form aligns the rest of the basis.

The projective action on one-spaces is faithful. For $m\ge 2$, a line stabilizer has three orbits: the line itself, the other lines perpendicular to it, and the lines not perpendicular to it. Witt's lemma proves transitivity within the latter two orbits by matching the two-dimensional restricted form. This action is primitive. A block containing distinct perpendicular lines $L,M$ is invariant under both stabilizers and therefore contains a line perpendicular to $M$ but not to $L$. A block containing distinct nonperpendicular lines likewise contains a line perpendicular to $L$ but not to $M$, by using the $M$ stabilizer. Such lines exist by nonsingularity in dimension at least four. Either possibility makes the block contain both nontrivial stabilizer orbits, hence every line. For $m=1$ the action on the projective line is two-transitive and thus primitive.

Symplectic transvections with one fixed center line form an Abelian normal subgroup of its stabilizer, and their conjugates generate the whole group. The Iwasawa simplicity lemma now reduces simplicity to being perfect. Its short proof is useful: any nontrivial normal subgroup of a faithful primitive group is transitive, since its orbits are blocks. Writing $G=NH$, where $H$ is a point stabilizer, shows that all conjugates of the specified Abelian subgroup have the same image modulo $N$. Thus $G/N$ is Abelian. If $G$ is perfect, $N=G$.

The groups can also be shown to be perfect concretely. For $q>3$ choose $a$ with $a^2\ne 1$ and let $D$ scale $e$ by $a$ and $f$ by $a^{-1}$. Thenso every symplectic transvection is a group commutator. For $q=3,m\ge 2$, symplectic transvections of coefficient one are conjugate, have order three, and the four with centers $e_1,e_2,e_1+e_2,e_1-e_2$ in a two-dimensional totally isotropic subspace multiply to the identity. They commute, and the sum of their rank-one terms is zero modulo three. Their common class in the abelianization is therefore annihilated by both three and four, hence is zero. For $q=2,m\ge 3$, use the seven nonzero vectors of a three-dimensional totally isotropic subspace. The symplectic transvections commute and their product is the identity, because each diagonal coefficient occurs four times and each cross coefficient twice. Their common abelianized class is annihilated by two and seven, hence is zero. Generation now proves these groups are perfect.

It follows thatThe exceptions are $S_3$, $A_4$ and $S_6$ respectively. For odd $q$ the full symplectic group over a finite field has nontrivial center of a group, so simplicity refers to its quotient group; for even $q$ the center of a group is trivial.

A symplectic parabolic subgroup stabilizes a flag of totally isotropic subspaces. The maximal such parabolic subgroups $P_r$ stabilize a single $r$-space, $1\le r\le m$. In an adapted basis their Levi subgroup is $G{L}_r(q)\times S{p}_{2m-2r}(q)$, with an arbitrary block of $r(2m-2r)$ parameters and a remaining symmetric block of $r(r+1)/2$ parameters. ThusThese are the single-member flag stabilizers, equivalently the standard maximal parabolic subgroups obtained by omitting one node of the symplectic Dynkin diagram. Two particular cases have transparent descriptions.

For the symplectic point stabilizer, write $V=⟨e,f⟩\perp W$. Its unipotent radical consists ofAll pairings are preserved by direct substitution. The product law is $(b,t)(b^{\prime },t^{\prime })=(b+b^{\prime },t+t^{\prime }+B(b,b^{\prime }))$, so this radical has order $q^{2m-1}$. With group commutator convention $uv{u}^{-1}{v}^{-1}$, its commutator has central parameter $2B(b,b^{\prime })$: it is Heisenberg-type in odd characteristic, but Abelian in characteristic two. A Levi subgroup scales $e,f$ inversely and acts as $Sp(W)$, givingThis index counts the one-spaces, all of which are isotropic for an alternating bilinear form.

For a Lagrangian subspace $E=⟨e_1,\dots ,e_m⟩$, the symplectic Lagrangian stabilizer has block formSubstituting into $g^{\mathsf{T}}Jg=J$ proves both the inverse-transpose lower block and symmetry of $S$. The unipotent radical is the additive group of symmetric matrices, and $A$ acts by $S\mapsto AS{A}^{\mathsf{T}}$. ThereforeThe last identity follows by canceling $q$-powers and $(q^j-1)$ factors in the two order formulas; it counts maximal totally isotropic subspaces.

Put $\bar{i}=2n+1-i$ and let $E_{ij}$ denote a matrix unit. The antidiagonal matrix satisfies $J^{-1}=J$, so the orthogonal condition is $A=-J{A}^{T}J$, or entrywise $A_{ij}=-A_{\bar{j}\bar{i}}$. Consequently the diagonal Cartan subalgebra isWe first take $n\ge 2$. Since $[H,E_{ab}]=(H_{aa}-H_{bb})E_{ab}$, the matrix root basis of the even orthogonal Lie algebra givesThe zero weight space is $\mathfrak{t}$; its basis is $H_i=E_{ii}-E_{\bar{i}\bar{i}}$. No vector of weight $2{\epsilon }_i$ occurs, because the corresponding matrix unit is forced to be its own negative. These spaces account for $n+2n(n-1)=n(2n-1)$ dimensions, exhausting the Special orthogonal Lie algebra. Thus its decomposition as a $\mathfrak{t}$-module and its Dn root system areEach nonzero root space has dimension one; the zero weight has multiplicity $n$.

The upper triangular root spaces are precisely those of weights ${\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_j$ and ${\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_j$ with $i<j$. ThereforeThese $n$ roots form the simple roots. To check that they generate the chosen positive system with nonnegative coefficients, write ${\epsilon }_i-{\epsilon }_j={\sum }_{k=i}^{j-1}{\alpha }_k$. For $j<n$,and for $j=n$ use ${\epsilon }_i+{\epsilon }_n={\sum }_{k=i}^{n-2}{\alpha }_k+{\alpha }_n$. Empty sums are zero. Their linear independence and these expansions identify the base of the root system.

Equip the real span of the roots in ${\mathfrak{t}}^{\ast }$ with the inner product making the ${\epsilon }_i$ orthonormal. All roots then have squared length two. The coroots of ${\epsilon }_i\pm {\epsilon }_j$ are $H_i\pm H_j$, so the fundamental weights of Dn, characterized by ${\omega }_i({\alpha }_j^{\vee })={\delta }_{ij}$, areTaking their pairings with $H_j-H_{j+1}$ and $H_{n-1}+H_n$ verifies the defining identities directly. For each pair $i<j$, the sum of its two positive roots is $2{\epsilon }_i$. Hence the half-sum of positive roots is

The Dynkin diagram has a chain ending at ${\alpha }_{n-2}$, which is joined to both ${\alpha }_{n-1}$ and ${\alpha }_n$. Every edge is a single bond because the root lengths agree; the nonzero off-diagonal simple-root pairings are minus one. The labelled Dn Dynkin diagram and its low-rank versions are shown below.

For $n=2$, ${\alpha }_1={\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$ and ${\alpha }_2={\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$ are orthogonal, giving two disconnected A1 root systems. For $n=3$, the diagram is the chain ${\alpha }_2-{\alpha }_1-{\alpha }_3$, of type A3 root system; the displayed weight formulas still apply. If $n=1$ is allowed, ${\mathfrak{so}}_2=\mathfrak{t}$ is one-dimensional and abelian: there are no roots or fundamental weights, and $\rho =0$.

Work with a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra. The Dynkin diagram is obtained from its intrinsic root system, with several structure theorems entering the construction.

First choose a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$. The semisimple structure theory gives the root-space decompositionThe nonzero roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, root spaces have dimension one, and every root has its negative. The rank is $r=\dim \mathfrak{h}$.

Next use the Killing form. Its nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{h}$ and its positive-definite restriction to the real coroot span identify the real root span $E=\mathbb{R}\Phi$ with a Euclidean space. Explicitly, if $t_{\lambda }={\mathcal{B}}^{-1}(\lambda )$, put $(\lambda ,\mu )=B(t_{\lambda },t_{\mu })$. The sl2 subalgebra associated with a root supplies its normalized coroot $H_{\alpha }$ and the integral pairingThe root-string theorem makes the reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$ permute $\Phi$. Together with the absence of multiples other than $\pm \alpha$, this shows that $\Phi$ is a finite reduced root system and a crystallographic root system. These properties come from semisimple Lie algebra theory, not from the diagram's definition.

Choose a vector in $E$ that is not perpendicular to any root. Define the positive roots by positive inner product with this vector. The simple roots are those positive roots that cannot be expressed as sums of two positive roots. Root-system theory shows that they form a basis $\Delta =\{{\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r\}$, and each root is an integer combination of them with coefficients all of one sign. Distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product.

Use the standard Cartan matrix conventionThere is one diagram vertex for each simple root. For $i\ne j$, the integral off-diagonal entries are nonpositive andConnect the two vertices with respectively zero, one, two or three edges. The corresponding angles are $90^{\circ },120^{\circ },135^{\circ },150^{\circ }$. A multiple edge carries an arrow toward the shorter root. For joined vertices, the length ratio is determined by $A_{ij}/A_{ji}=({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)$; hence the diagram records both angle and relative length.

For example, ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ has simple roots $L_1-L_2$ and $L_2-L_3$, giving two equal-length vertices joined by one edge: type $A_2$. For ${\mathfrak{sp}}_4$, take ${\alpha }_1=L_1-L_2$ and ${\alpha }_2=2L_2$. Thenso the two vertices have a double edge directed toward ${\alpha }_1$, the shorter root: type $C_2$.

Finally, orthogonal irreducible components of the root system correspond to the simple ideals of a Lie algebra in the semisimple Lie algebra, so its diagram is the disjoint union of their connected diagrams. Conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras and the Weyl group action on choices of positive roots make the resulting diagram independent of these choices up to isomorphism. Thus the vertices, edge multiplicities, arrows and connected components encode the simple-root geometry and the simple-ideal decomposition.

A Dynkin diagram has one vertex for each simple root. Vertices $i,j$ are joined by $a_{ij}{a}_{ji}$ bonds, where $a_{ij}$ are the off-diagonal Cartan integers. No bond means orthogonality; one, two and three bonds mean angles $2\pi /3,3\pi /4,5\pi /6$. A multiple-bond arrow points to the shorter root. Thus the Dynkin diagram determines the Cartan matrix, including the relative lengths inside each connected component.

An irreducible root system corresponds to a connected Dynkin diagram. The classification of finite crystallographic Dynkin diagrams givesHere $C_2$ is already represented by $B_2$, and $B_1,C_1$ by $A_1$. General systems are orthogonal direct sums of these, with separate component scales. The following diagrams specify all the types; dots denote a continued chain, not additional vertices.

For orientation, the An Dynkin diagram is a single chain, the Bn Dynkin diagram has a terminal double bond pointing to its terminal short root, and the Cn Dynkin diagram reverses that arrow. The Dn Dynkin diagram has arm lengths $1,1,l-3$. The En Dynkin diagram has arm lengths $1,2,2$; $1,2,3$; or $1,2,4$. The F4 Dynkin diagram has a central double bond and the G2 Dynkin diagram a triple bond.

The positivity behind this finite list is the positive-definite Gram matrix of the simple roots. In particular the underlying graph is a tree: if it contained a cycle, the sum of its normalized roots would have squared norm at most zero, since each bonded inner product is at most $-1/2$. This contradicts linear independence. Restricting the possible bonds and branches by positive definiteness gives precisely the listed chains and trees. Conversely their Cartan matrices are positive definite after symmetrization and their reflection-generated root sets give the indicated finite root systems.

Work in finite dimension over $\mathbb{C}$; the characteristic-zero real version follows by complexification. The Cartan solvability criterion isIts semisimplicity consequence, also often called Cartan's criterion, is $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple if and only if its Killing form is nondegenerate. We prove both forms.

The auxiliary results used are as follows. The Lie theorem simultaneously triangularizes every finite-dimensional representation of a complex solvable Lie algebra. The Engel theorem says that a matrix Lie algebra consisting entirely of nilpotent endomorphisms has a common annihilated nonzero vector and a basis making all its matrices strictly upper triangular; in particular it is a nilpotent Lie algebra. Nilpotent means that the lower central series terminates, which implies that the derived series terminates as well. Finally, the Additive Jordan decomposition writes any complex endomorphism uniquely as $x=x_s+x_n$, where $x_s$ is diagonalizable, $x_n$ is nilpotent and they commute. On a generalized eigenspace $V_{\lambda }$, the two parts are $\lambda I$ and $x-\lambda I$, and both are polynomials in $x$. On endomorphisms, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_s$ is diagonalizable, $\mathrm{ad}{x}_n$ is nilpotent, and these are the Jordan parts of $\mathrm{ad}x$: the first assertion follows by splitting into maps between eigenspaces, and the second by expanding repeated commutators with the nilpotent $x_n$.

First prove the linear trace version: if $L\subseteq \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ andthen $L$ is solvable. Fix $x\in [L,L]$ and let $V=⨁V_{\lambda }$ be its generalized eigenspace decomposition. Define $y$ to act on $V_{\lambda }$ by the scalar $\overline{\lambda }$. We do not assume that $y$, $x_s$ or $x_n$ belongs to $L$.

On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ has the form $(\lambda -\mu )I+N$ with $N$ nilpotent, whereas $\mathrm{ad}y$ is multiplication by $\overline{\lambda -\mu }$. Choose a polynomial $q$ with $q(d)=\bar{d}$ for every occurring eigenvalue difference $d$, and with all its derivatives of positive order up to the relevant nilpotency index zero at $d$. Such a polynomial exists by Hermite interpolation, or the Chinese remainder theorem for the pairwise coprime powers of $(t-d)$. At $d=0$ its value is zero, so $q(0)=0$. Expanding $q(dI+N)$ now givesBecause $x\in L$ and $[L,L]$ is an ideal, every positive power of $\mathrm{ad}x$ sends $L$ into $[L,L]$. The zero constant term therefore gives $[y,L]\subseteq [L,L]$.

Express $x$ as a sum of commutators ${\sum }_j[a_j,b_j]$ with $a_j,b_j\in L$. Cyclicity of trace and the hypothesis implyBut on $V_{\lambda }$, $xy$ has trace $\dim (V_{\lambda })|\lambda {|}^2$, since the nilpotent part has trace zero. Henceforcing every eigenvalue of $x$ to vanish. Thus every member of the derived algebra $[L,L]$ is a nilpotent endomorphism. By the Engel theorem, $[L,L]$ is nilpotent and therefore solvable; its derived series terminates, and adjoining the initial term $L$ shows that $L$ is solvable.

Conversely, if $L$ is solvable, the Lie theorem makes it upper triangular. Commutators of upper-triangular matrices have zero diagonal, and multiplying such a commutator by an upper-triangular matrix still has zero diagonal. Therefore the trace condition holds. Apply this equivalence to $L=\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Its trace pairing is the Killing form, and solvability of its image is equivalent to solvability of $\mathfrak{g}$: the kernel is its abelian centre, so a terminating derived series in the quotient terminates after at most one more step in $\mathfrak{g}$. This proves the solvability criterion.

For the semisimplicity criterion, let $R$ be the radical of the Killing form. Invariance makes $R$ a Lie algebra ideal. For $x,y\in R$, their adjoint actions on $\mathfrak{g}/R$ vanish, so computing trace in a basis adapted to $R$ gives $B_R(x,y)=B_{\mathfrak{g}}(x,y)=0$. The solvability criterion applied to $R$ shows it is a solvable ideal. Thus a semisimple Lie algebra has $R=0$ and a nondegenerate Killing form.

Conversely, any nonzero solvable ideal has a last nonzero term $A$ in its derived series; this is an abelian ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$. For $x\in A$, $y\in \mathfrak{g}$, the map $\mathrm{ad}x\mathrm{ad}y$ sends $\mathfrak{g}$ into $A$ and vanishes on $A$, so has trace zero. Hence $A\subseteq R$. A nondegenerate Killing form therefore rules out nonzero solvable ideals, exactly the definition of semisimplicity.

For classification, nondegeneracy of the Killing form provides the duality and root-space pairings used to extract a reduced crystallographic root system from a semisimple Lie algebra. Classification then reduces to the finite Dynkin diagrams and reconstruction of the Lie algebra from its root data.

The single bonds give equal simple-root lengths and inner products, after normalization,The positive roots of this A3 root system areThe first two sums are roots by the qualified obtuse-root lemma. The last is a root because $(\alpha +\beta ,\gamma )=-1$. All have nonnegative simple-root coordinates, hence are positive.