Codex @codex  0

For finite-dimensional unitary representations of a compact group, average the action on $\mathrm{Hom}(W,V)$ against normalized Haar measure. This is the orthogonal projection onto the intertwining operators, and its trace is the displayed integral. The Schur lemma therefore makes distinct irreducible characters orthogonal and each irreducible character of norm one.

A bilinear form on a Lie algebra representation is invariant when it satisfies the displayed identity. Equivalently, $T_B(v)=B(v,-)$ is an intertwining operator from the representation to its dual Lie algebra representation. For a finite-dimensional irreducible representation over an algebraically closed field, any nonzero such form is nondegenerate, and the Schur lemma makes all invariant forms proportional. In characteristic different from two, transposing twice then proves that the form is a symmetric bilinear form or an alternating bilinear form.

For $h\in G$, right-multiplying by $D_2(h{)}^{-1}$ givesMake the bijective substitution $k=hg$, so $g^{-1}{h}^{-1}=k^{-1}$. The sum becomes ${\sum }_k{D}_1(k)B{D}_2(k^{-1})=T$. HenceThus $T$ is an intertwining operator from the second group representation to the first. This is the Schur averaging of rectangular matrices construction.

A group is a nonempty set $G$ with an operation $G\times G\to G$, $(g,h)\mapsto gh$, satisfying associativity, an identity element $e$ with $eg=ge=g$, and an inverse element $g^{-1}$ with $g{g}^{-1}=g^{-1}g=e$ for every $g$. These are the group axioms. An Abelian group additionally satisfies $gh=hg$ for every pair. A subgroup is a subset that is itself a group under the restricted operation; equivalently, it is nonempty and closed under $h{k}^{-1}$.

Let $R:G\to \mathrm{GL}(V)$ be a nonzero, finite-dimensional complex irreducible representation of an Abelian group. For each fixed $g$, commutativity givesThus $R(g)$ is an intertwining operator from $R$ to itself. By Schur's lemma over the complex numbers, $R(g)={\lambda }_g{I}_V$. Every line in $V$ is therefore an invariant subspace. Since $R$ is irreducible, this forcesThis is the finite-dimensional convention used throughout the paper. Without it, the literal assertion for arbitrary Abelian groups needs qualification. A concrete counterexample is $G=\mathbb{C}(t{)}^{\times }$ acting by multiplication on the complex vector space $V=\mathbb{C}(t)$ of rational functions. Any nonzero invariant complex vector subspace containing $f$ contains $gf$ for every nonzero rational $g$, hence contains every rational function. This is an infinite-dimensional irreducible representation. The scalar conclusion of Schur's lemma used above depends on finite dimensionality.

The invariant tensors of SU(3) include ${\delta }_{\beta }^{\alpha }$, ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta \gamma }$ and its upper-index counterpart. Consequently an antisymmetric pair of upper fundamental indices can be converted into one lower antifundamental index, and conversely; a completely antisymmetric triple is a determinant singlet. In the Young-symmetrizer tensor decomposition, complete columns of three can therefore be removed. A remaining diagram has rows of lengths $k+l,l$: its two-box columns become $l$ dual indices and its remaining boxes give $k$ defining indices. The irreducible highest-weight component is represented by a mixed SU(3) tensor representation symmetric in all upper indices, symmetric in all lower indices, and with every upper-lower contraction removed. Such contractions produce the lower-weight components. The resulting symmetric traceless SU(3) tensor representation has Dynkin labels $(k,l)$; this is an equivalent canonical realization, not a claim that an arbitrary tensor already has those symmetries.

There are $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{k+2}{2}\right)$ symmetric upper-index components and $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{l+2}{2}\right)$ symmetric lower-index components. All contractions are equivalent under the separate symmetries. Their image is the separately symmetric tensor space with $(k-1,l-1)$ indices. To subtract its dimension legitimately, we must show that contraction is onto.

Represent such tensors by polynomials of bidegree $(k,l)$ in three variables $x$ and three dual variables $y$. Up to a nonzero normalization, contraction isIf $P$ has bidegree $(k-1,l-1)$, differentiation givesChoose $a_0=1/(k+l+1)$ and $a_j=-a_{j-1}/[(j+1)(k+l+1-j)]$. Thenhas bidegree $(k,l)$ and $\Delta Q=P$: consecutive terms cancel, and the last further derivative vanishes. This constructs a preimage of every contraction target. If $k=0$ or $l=0$, there is no contraction. Therefore the number of trace-free components isThe highest-weight vector $x_1^k{y}_3^l$ lies in this kernel. The Young-symmetry construction identifies the traceless highest-weight component with the irreducible representation of labels $(k,l)$; equivalently its Weyl dimension formula agrees with the independently calculated kernel dimension above.

For traceless matrices $T,S$, the tensor square of the SU(3) adjoint representation decomposes asThe component maps make the decomposition concrete. The singlet is $\mathrm{tr}(TS)$. The two octets are the antisymmetric commutator $[T,S]$ and symmetric traceless anticommutator $\{T,S\}-\frac{2}{3}\mathrm{tr}(TS)I$. Symmetrizing the two upper and two lower indices in $T_{\beta }^{\alpha }{S}_{\delta }^{\gamma }$ and removing contractions gives $R(2,2)$, the 27. Its highest component is already visible in $E_{13}\otimes E_{13}$.

For the 10, contract the two lower indices with ${ϵ}^{\beta \delta \rho }$ and symmetrize the three upper indices $\alpha ,\gamma ,\rho$; for its conjugate, contract the upper pair with ${ϵ}_{\alpha \gamma \rho }$ and symmetrize the three lower indices. These maps are antisymmetric under exchange of $T,S$. They are nonzero: $T=E_{12},S=E_{13}$ produces a nonzero all-upper-1 component, and $T=E_{21},S=E_{31}$ produces the conjugate all-lower-1 component. Thus they reach the irreducible $R(3,0)$ and $R(0,3)$, each of dimension ten. The octet maps are also nonzero, for example on a pair of noncommuting matrix units and on equal nonzero traceless diagonal matrices. These equivariant maps supply distinct irreducible constituents, with the two octets separated by exchange symmetry. Their dimensions exhaust the product:

An octet operator between baryon octet states defines an intertwining operator $8_{\mathrm{operator}}\otimes 8_{\mathrm{state}}\to 8_{\mathrm{state}}$. Its covariance follows from the commutator transformation law in the question. By Schur lemma, the number of independent reduced matrix elements is the multiplicity of the output octet in the product: there are exactly two independent coefficients. To display them, use a Hermitian octet matrix basis $B_s={\lambda }_s$, $t_i={\lambda }_i/2$, normalized by $\mathrm{tr}({\lambda }_r{\lambda }_s)=2{\delta }_{rs}$. The two allowed actions areWith $[{\lambda }_i,{\lambda }_s]=2i{f}_{isk}{\lambda }_k$ and $\{{\lambda }_i,{\lambda }_s\}=\frac{4}{3}{\delta }_{is}I+2d_{isk}{\lambda }_k$, this gives the two reduced octet matrix elements:up to the common normalization absorbed into $F,D$. All component dependence is fixed by the invariant symmetric and antisymmetric tensors. For a Hermitian operator and this Hermitian basis, $F,D$ may be chosen real; neither their values nor a relation between them follows from symmetry alone.

For $G=U(n)$ take the diagonal maximal torusThe spectral theorem for unitary matrices says that every element is conjugate to an element of $T$. A diagonal element with pairwise distinct eigenvalues has centralizer exactly $T$. Its conjugates therefore determine its eigenvalues up to permutation, and the normalizer quotient is $W=N_G(T)/T\cong S_n$. The character lattice of a torus $T$ is ${\mathbb{Z}}^n$, with $e^{\lambda }(z)=z_1^{{\lambda }_1}\cdots z_n^{{\lambda }_n}$. Conjugation on the matrix unit $E_{ij}$ has weight $e_i-e_j$, so these are the roots. Choose $e_i-e_j$ positive for $i<j$; thenDominant integral weights are precisely the integer tuples ${\lambda }_1\ge \cdots \ge {\lambda }_n$. Negative entries are allowed: they correspond to determinant twists, so polynomial representations alone do not exhaust the irreducible representations of $U(n)$.

Normalize Haar measure on $G$ and $T$ to have mass one, and putThe Weyl integration formula for U(n) for a continuous class function isFor a general continuous function, replace $f(t)$ in the torus integral by ${\int }_{G/T}f(gt{g}^{-1})d(gT)$, using the normalized invariant quotient measure.

To prove the formula, consider the conjugation map $q:G/T\times T\to G$, $q(gT,t)=gt{g}^{-1}$. On regular torus elements its fibres have exactly $n!$ points: the possible orderings of the distinct eigenvalues. Equip the group with an invariant inner product on its Lie algebra and split $\mathfrak{u}(n)=\mathfrak{t}\oplus {\mathfrak{t}}^{\perp }$. After translating the derivative back to the identity, its torus directions contribute the identity, while its transverse directions contribute ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{t^{-1}}-I$. Each pair $i<j$ supplies a real two-dimensional off-diagonal plane. On that plane ${\mathrm{Ad}}_t$ is multiplication by $z_i/z_j$, regarded as a plane rotation, so the absolute real determinant of the transverse derivative isThe change-of-variables theorem, divided by the covering multiplicity, now gives the desired weighted integral up to the constant relating the normalized invariant measures. The nonregular locus has measure zero: repeated eigenvalues are the zero-set of the nonzero discriminant, and the torus coincidence sets likewise have measure zero. Thus its omission causes no change to the integral. To determine the normalization, expand $\Delta$ as a sum of $n!$ distinct torus characters. Fourier orthogonality gives ${\int }_T|\Delta {|}^{2}dt=n!$. Applying the formula to $f=1$ fixes the coefficient to $1/n!$. This proves both the class-function and conjugacy-averaged forms.

We can now derive the character formula from integration, rather than merely quote it. Use the basic highest-weight theorem: a finite-dimensional irreducible representation has a unique highest weight $\lambda$ with a one-dimensional highest-weight space; all its other weights are $\lambda$ minus a nonnegative sum of positive roots. Its character is Weyl invariant. Also, character orthogonality for compact groups gives ${\int }_G|{\chi }_{\lambda }{|}^2=1$. This orthogonality follows by averaging the representation on $\mathrm{End}(V_{\lambda })$: the integral projects onto intertwining operators, whose dimension is one by the Schur lemma.

Let $\delta =(n-1,n-2,\dots ,0)$ and, for a strictly decreasing integer tuple $\eta$, put $A_{\eta }(z)=\det (z_i^{{\eta }_j})$. The finite Laurent polynomial $\Delta {\chi }_{\lambda }$ is alternating. Every alternating Laurent polynomial is a linear combination of the $A_{\eta }$: collect its monomials by permutation orbits, and observe that an orbit with repeated exponents has zero coefficient by antisymmetry. Different $A_{\eta }$ are orthogonal on $T$ and each has squared norm $n!$.

The coefficient of $z^{\lambda +\delta }$ in $\Delta {\chi }_{\lambda }$ is exactly one. Indeed, a contribution from the term $z^{w\delta }$ would require a weight $\lambda +\delta -w\delta$ in $V_{\lambda }$. For $w\ne 1$, the vector $\delta -w\delta$ is a nonzero nonnegative combination of the positive simple roots, so that weight lies above $\lambda$ and is impossible. The identity permutation supplies the highest-weight coefficient one. ConsequentlyApply the integration formula to $|{\chi }_{\lambda }{|}^2$. Torus orthogonality givesAll the other coefficients vanish, provingThe quotient extends across repeated eigenvalues because its product with the denominator is the already defined continuous character. Equivalently, alternant divisibility makes it a Laurent polynomial invariant under permutations; multiply by a determinant power if negative exponents must first be removed.

Finally, $\delta -\rho =\frac{n-1}{2}(1,\dots ,1)$ is fixed by the Weyl group, so its common factor cancels in the quotient. Since $A_{\rho }=e^{\rho }{\prod }_{\alpha >0}(1-e^{-\alpha })$, the determinant expression is exactlyUsing $\delta$ in the derivation avoids treating a possibly half-integral $\rho$ as an actual character of the torus. At the identity, taking the leading Vandermonde term of the two determinants gives the accompanying dimension formula

Schur's lemma says that a nonzero intertwiner between irreducible representations is an isomorphism; over $\mathbb{C}$, every endomorphism of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation is scalar. To prove the Schur lemma, let $T:V\to W$ be a intertwining operator between irreducible representations. Its kernel and image of a linear map are invariant. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility forces $\ker T=0$ and $\mathrm{im}T=W$. This proves the first assertion over any field. In particular the endomorphisms of an irreducible representation form a division ring.

When $V$ is finite-dimensional over an algebraically closed field, an endomorphism $T$ has an eigenvalue $\lambda$. The endomorphism $T-\lambda I$ has nonzero kernel. By the first assertion it must be zero, so $T=\lambda I$. Consequently, for complex finite-dimensional irreducible representations, the space of intertwining operators has dimension zero for nonisomorphic representations and dimension one for isomorphic representations.

Every finite-dimensional representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra is completely reducible. We prove the Weyl complete reducibility theorem using the allowed Casimir operator facts, without assuming a splitting in advance. For dual bases $x_i,x^i$ with respect to the Killing form, the Casimir elementis central in the universal enveloping algebra. Hence its Casimir operator $C_M={\sum }_i{\rho }_M(x_i){\rho }_M(x^i)$ commutes with the action on every Lie algebra representation $M$ and is compatible with subrepresentations, quotient representations, and intertwining operators. On the trivial Lie algebra representation it acts by zero. On every nontrivial finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation it acts by a nonzero scalar.

For clarity, the last fact can be expressed by the Casimir eigenvalue formula: on an irreducible with dominant integral weight $\lambda$, the scalar is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, with the inner product induced by the Killing form and $\rho$ the half-sum of positive roots. On the real span of the weights this inner product is positive definite, and the scalar is positive for $\lambda \ne 0$. For a semisimple Lie algebra with several simple factors the scalars add, so a nontrivial representation still gives a nonzero scalar. These are properties of the Casimir operator being used here.

First establish Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient. Supposeis a short exact sequence of finite-dimensional Lie algebra representations, with trivial quotient. The generalized eigenspaces of $C_E$ are invariant, soEach $E_c$ with $c\ne 0$ maps to zero under $q$: applying a sufficiently large power of $C_E-cI$ and using $C_{\mathbb{C}}=0$ gives $(-c{)}^{r}q(e)=0$. Thus $q(E_0)=\mathbb{C}$.

Take a composition series of a module of $E_0$. The Casimir operator is nilpotent on $E_0$, so its scalar on every irreducible composition factor is zero. The stated Casimir operator property makes every such factor trivial. In a basis adapted to the composition series of a module, the image of $\mathfrak{g}$ on $E_0$ therefore consists of strictly upper triangular matrices, so that image is solvable. The allowed fact that a semisimple Lie algebra acts trivially on every one-dimensional representation implies that $\mathfrak{g}$ is a perfect Lie algebra: otherwise a nonzero linear functional on $\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$ would define a nontrivial one-dimensional Lie algebra representation. Thus $\mathfrak{g}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, and its image is consequently a perfect Lie algebra too. A perfect Lie algebra that is also a solvable Lie algebra is zero, since its derived series of a Lie algebra is constant until it vanishes. Hence $\mathfrak{g}$ acts trivially on $E_0$. Choose $e\in E_0$ with $q(e)=1$. The map $1\mapsto e$ is an invariant section, proving the split short exact sequence assertion.

Now let $W\subseteq V$ be any nonzero subrepresentation. On the Hom representation $\mathrm{Hom}(V,W)$ the action isConsider the invariant subspaceRestriction produces a short exact sequenceSurjectivity follows by extending $I_W$ to a linear map on $V$. The quotient is trivial, because $I_W$ commutes with the action on $W$. The preceding Casimir splitting of a trivial quotient yields an invariant $p:V\to W$ with $p{|}_W=I_W$. Thusand $\ker p$ is invariant. The zero subrepresentation also has a complement. Repeatedly splitting off an irreducible subrepresentation now gives a direct sum of irreducibles, proving the Weyl complete reducibility theorem.

A derivation of a Lie algebra is a linear map $D:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathfrak{g}$ satisfying the Leibniz ruleThe space $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ is a vector subspace of $\mathrm{End}(\mathfrak{g})$. Equip it with the commutator $[D,E]=DE-ED$. Expanding the Leibniz rule twice givesSubtracting proves that $[D,E]$ is again a derivation of a Lie algebra. Antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity hold for the commutator in every associative endomorphism algebra, so this defines the derivation Lie algebra.

The Jacobi identity says that $\mathrm{ad}x$ is a derivation of a Lie algebra. Moreover, for $D\in \mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$,soThis makes $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$ an ideal of a Lie algebra in $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$.

Finally suppose $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ act on $\mathrm{Der}(\mathfrak{g})$ by $x\cdot D=[\mathrm{ad}x,D]$. The Weyl complete reducibility theorem supplies an invariant complement $M$ to $\mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. For $D\in M$, invariance gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in M$, while the ideal identity above gives $[\mathrm{ad}x,D]\in \mathrm{ad}\mathfrak{g}$. Their intersection is zero, so $\mathrm{ad}(Dx)=0$ for every $x$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero, hence $Dx=0$ for every $x$, and $M=0$. ThereforeEvery derivation of a Lie algebra is inner, and the element giving it is unique because the center of a Lie algebra vanishes.

For the finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation specified in the PDF, a Lie-invariant bilinear form satisfiesThe dual Lie algebra representation has action $(x\varphi )(w)=-\varphi (xw)$, so the map $T_B:V\to V^{\ast }$ defined by $T_B(v)=B(v,-)$ is an intertwining operator. If $V$ is irreducible and $B\ne 0$, its kernel is zero. Since $V,V^{\ast }$ have equal finite dimension, $T_B$ is an isomorphism, and $B$ is a nondegenerate bilinear form.

For $B_1\ne 0$, the composition $T_{B_1}^{-1}{T}_{B_2}$ is a representation endomorphism. Over an algebraically closed field, the Schur lemma makes it scalar, provingTransposing $B$ gives another Lie-invariant bilinear form. For $B\ne 0$, write $B^T=\mu B$; transposing twice gives ${\mu }^2=1$. In field characteristic different from two, this means $\mu =1$ or $\mu =-1$. Thus the form is a symmetric bilinear form or an alternating bilinear form, respectively. The zero form has both properties. In the second case $B(v,v)=-B(v,v)$ forces $B(v,v)=0$, using the same characteristic assumption.

View $X$ as the matrix of a linear map $T:F^m\to F^n$ of matrix rank $r$. Choose vectors $u_1,\dots ,u_r$ whose images form a basis of $\mathrm{im}T$, extend them by a basis of $\ker T$ to a basis of $F^m$, and extend $T{u}_1,\dots ,T{u}_r$ to a basis of $F^n$. In these two bases the matrix of $T$ is the rank normal formThe two changes of basis give invertible $P,Q$ with the displayed matrix equal to $Q^{-1}XP$.

For the block upper triangular matrix $A=\left(\begin{array}{cc}B& D\\ 0& C\end{array}\right)$, every nonzero term in the Leibniz formula for determinants sends the rows belonging to $C$ into the columns belonging to $C$; bijectivity then sends the remaining rows into the $B$ columns. The permutation sum consequently factors into the determinant sums for $B$ and $C$, proving

Finally suppose $L(X)=0$, so $AX=XB$: the map $X:{\mathbb{C}}^m\to {\mathbb{C}}^n$ is an intertwining operator. If $v$ lies in the generalized eigenspace of $B$ for $\lambda$, then for some $k$,Because $A$ and $B$ have no common eigenvalue, $A-\lambda I$ is invertible, hence $Xv=0$. The generalized eigenspaces of $B$ span ${\mathbb{C}}^m$, so $X=0$. Thus the Sylvester equation operator $L$ is injective.

Work in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, with ${\bar{Q}}_{\dot{\alpha }A}=(Q_{\alpha }^A{)}^{†}$ in a unitary representation. The usual Super-Poincaré algebra has the Poincare algebra and possible internal Lorentz scalars as its even generators, and only the stated Weyl spinors as its odd generators. This closure assumption is essential: Lorentz covariance alone would also permit additional tensor-valued generators. It is the setting selected by the Haag–Łopuszański–Sohnius theorem for ordinary interacting relativistic theories.

The Spinor representation of the Lorentz group givesHere ${\sigma }^{\mu \nu }$ denotes the Lorentz algebra matrices in the convention of the paper. Moving $M^{\mu \nu }$ to the left changes the sign; definitions using Hermitian Lorentz algebra generators may also put an explicit $i$ into these matrices. The conjugate relation acts on the dotted Weyl spinor indices.

The tensor product of group representationsis a Lorentz four-vector. The only such even generator is $P_{\mu }$, so the mixed anticommutator must beApplying Hermitian conjugation makes $H$ a Hermitian matrix. Positivity of $\{S,S^{†}\}$ for every linear combination $S$ of supercharges makes $H$ a positive semidefinite matrix on a positive-energy physical superalgebra representation. Remove any null supercharges, which act trivially, and use a unitary diagonalization of a normal matrix followed by rescaling to obtain $H^A{}_B=2{\delta }^A{}_B$. Thus $\mathcal{N}$ counts the independent nontrivial supercharges.

For equal chirality, the tensor product of group representations isConsequently the tentative equal-chirality anticommutator can contain ${ϵ}_{\alpha \beta }{Z}^{AB}$ and a symmetric spinor tensor $T_{\alpha \beta }^{\mu \nu }{M}_{\mu \nu }{Y}^{AB}$, where $T$ is the intertwining operator for Lorentz covariance onto $(1,0)$. Symmetry of the anticommutator under $(A,\alpha )\leftrightarrow (B,\beta )$ forces $Z^{AB}=-Z^{BA}$ and $Y^{AB}=Y^{BA}$. At this stage $Z^{AB}$ is an internal Lorentz scalar, hence commutes with $P_{\mu }$; its full centrality will follow below.

To determine the commutator with translations, Lorentz covariance and the absence of additional odd generators leave onlyand the relation obtained by Hermitian conjugation. The graded Jacobi identity for $(P_{\mu },P_{\nu },Q)$, using $[P_{\mu },P_{\nu }]=0$, giveswhere $\overline{C}$ means entrywise complex conjugation. This equation alone would not imply $C=0$. Contract the graded Jacobi identitywith ${ϵ}^{\alpha \beta }$. The $M$ term drops out because its spinor tensor is symmetric, and $[P_{\mu },Z^{AB}]=0$ makes the remaining left side vanish. Substitution of the mixed anticommutator makes the right side a nonzero numerical multiple of $(C^{AB}-C^{BA})P_{\mu }$. Thus $C=C^T$. It follows that $\overline{C}=C^{†}$ and $C{C}^{†}=0$, whence $C=0$. Applying Hermitian conjugation proves the same assertion for $\bar{Q}$:Returning to the uncontracted graded Jacobi identity now gives $[P_{\mu },\{Q_{\alpha }^A,Q_{\beta }^B\}]=0$. Since the Lorentz algebra generators do not commute with translations, the tentative $M$ term must have $Y^{AB}=0$. HenceIn particular $Z^{11}=0$ for $\mathcal{N}=1$. The dotted-dotted anticommutator follows by Hermitian conjugation applied to the second relation.

The graded Jacobi identity for $(Q^A,Q^B,{\bar{Q}}_C)$, together with $[P,Q]=0$, gives $[Z^{AB},{\bar{Q}}_C]=0$. As a Lorentz scalar, $Z^{AB}$ commutes with $M_{\mu \nu }$, and it already commutes with $P_{\mu }$. Closure and Lorentz covariance make $[Z^{AB},Q_{\alpha }^C]=D^{AB,C}{}_D{Q}_{\alpha }^D$ for some coefficients. Apply the graded Jacobi identity once more:Thus $D=0$. Since every $Z$ and $Z^{†}$ is itself an anticommutator of supercharges, the $Z$'s also commute with each other and their conjugates. Therefore $Z^{AB}$ are central charges in supersymmetry of the displayed algebra. Additional R-symmetry automorphisms are not among the generators specified here.

For boson-fermion degeneracy in a supermultiplet, fix a physical four-momentum $p$ with $p_0=E>0$, and take the finite internal space of states at that four-momentum. Let $\Gamma =(-1{)}^F$ be fermion parity. It anticommutes with each supercharge and its adjoint. For any fixed $A$, summing the diagonal spinor indices givesbecause ${\sigma }^0=1$ and the Pauli matrices are traceless. Cyclicity of the operator trace and $\Gamma Q=-Q\Gamma$ implyThe supertrace of the preceding summed anticommutator therefore vanishes:This counts physical boson and fermion degrees of freedom, including polarizations. The phrase “any representation” needs a qualification: a one-dimensional even supersymmetric vacuum with $P=Q=Z=0$ has one boson and no fermion. Thus the equality applies to positive-energy physical supermultiplets with finite state counts at fixed four-momentum, not to arbitrary abstract superalgebra representations or unregulated infinite-dimensional operator traces.

Schur lemma over $\mathbb{C}$ states that an intertwining operator $T:V\to W$ between finite-dimensional irreducible complex representations is either zero or an isomorphism. In particular, every intertwining endomorphism of $V$ is a scalar multiple of the identity.

Indeed, $\ker T\subseteq V$ and $\mathrm{im}T\subseteq W$ are invariant subspaces. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility gives $\ker T=0$ and $\mathrm{im}T=W$, so $T$ is an isomorphism. For an endomorphism $T:V\to V$, the fundamental theorem of algebra gives an eigenvalue $\lambda \in \mathbb{C}$. Then $T-\lambda I$ is an intertwiner with nonzero kernel, so the first part forces $T-\lambda I=0$. Hence $T=\lambda I$, completing the Proof of Schur lemma.

A representation is completely reducible, or semisimple, when it is a direct sum of irreducible representation. Equivalently, every invariant subspace has an invariant complement.

Maschke's theorem says that every finite-dimensional representation of a finite group $G$ over a field of characteristic zero is completely reducible. More generally, it is enough that the field characteristic does not divide $|G|$.

Schur lemma states the following.

Indeed, $\ker T\subseteq V$ and $\mathrm{im}T\subseteq W$ are invariant subspaces. If $T\ne 0$, irreducibility forcesso $T$ is an isomorphism. For an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex representation, choose an eigenvalue $\lambda$ of $T$. The intertwiner $T-\lambda I$ has nonzero kernel, so the first part forcesThis proves the Proof of Schur lemma.

Now let $\rho :G\to \mathrm{GL}(V)$ be faithful and irreducible over $\mathbb{C}$. For every $z\in Z(G)$, the operator $\rho (z)$ commutes with every $\rho (g)$. Schur's lemma therefore givesfor some ${\lambda }_z\in {\mathbb{C}}^{\times }$. Faithfulness makes $z\mapsto {\lambda }_z$ an embeddingSince every finite subgroup of the multiplicative complex numbers is cyclic,This is the cyclic-center obstruction to a faithful irreducible representation.

An invariant bilinear form $B$ defines a linear mapInvariance givesso ${\Phi }_B$ is an $G$-homomorphism. Its kernel is a $G$-subrepresentation of irreducible $V$. Hence either ${\Phi }_B=0$, so $B=0$, or ${\Phi }_B$ is injective and therefore a linear isomorphism $V\to V^{\ast }$. In the latter case $B$ is a nondegenerate.

If $B$ and $C$ are two nonzero invariant forms, thenBy Schur lemma, this endomorphism is scalar, so $B=\lambda C$. Cases involving the zero form are immediate. Thus any two invariant bilinear forms are proportional.

A tensor operator transforming in an irreducible representation $R$ between states in $V$ defines an intertwining operator $R\otimes V\to V$. In a basis of these intertwining maps, its scalar coefficients $g_{\nu }$ are reduced matrix elements, independent of the component indices. Schur lemma makes the number of independent coefficients the multiplicity of $V$ in $R\otimes V$. The component dependence is fixed by the associated Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

A similarity transformation replaces a square matrix by a similar matrix. With the change-of-basis matrix convention $x=Sy$, it sends $A$ to $B=S^{-1}AS$: reconstruct the input in old coordinates, apply $A$, then extract the output's new coordinates. These three operations explain the order of the factors.

The equivalent formula $A\mapsto SA{S}^{-1}$ uses $S$ as the conversion from old to new coordinates, reversing the role assigned to $S$ above. For the opening example's numerical $S$, this opposite conversion gives $SA{S}^{-1}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}2& 3\\ 0& 5\end{array}\right)$. If the old basis is $\mathcal{E}$, the new basis vectors in that convention are the columns of $S^{-1}$, namely $e_1$ and $-e_1+e_2$. Both formulas are similarity transformations; the direction of the coordinate conversion decides which one describes a specified basis.

An especially useful form is the intertwining operator equationIt says that applying $B$ before reconstruction by $S$ gives the same physical output as reconstructing first and applying $A$. Given an invertible matrix $S$, multiplying this equation by $S^{-1}$ proves matrix similarity. Without invertibility, the equation alone does not prove matrix similarity.

Realize $V_n={\mathrm{Sym}}^n{\mathbb{C}}^2$. Contract $r$ pairs of indices, one from each symmetric tensor, with the alternating invariant tensor $ϵ$, and symmetrize the remaining indices. This is a nonzero intertwining operator into $V_{m+n-2r}$. In the bihomogeneous polynomial realization, $(z_1{w}_2-z_2{w}_1{)}^r{z}_1^{m-r}{w}_1^{n-r}$ is a highest-weight vector of weight $m+n-2r$. Its lowering string has length $m+n-2r+1$. These inequivalent irreducible summands exhaust the tensor product, since their dimensions sum to $(m+1)(n+1)$.

The Wigner-Eckart theorem separates the dependence of a spherical tensor operator on angular momentum projections from its dynamical content. In one standard convention,The reduced matrix element on the right is independent of $m,m^{\prime },q$. The Clebsch-Gordan coefficients impose $m^{\prime }=m+q$ and $|j-k|\le j^{\prime }\le j+k$; additional selection rules, including parity, can make the reduced matrix element vanish.

To see why the factorization holds, combine the rank-$k$ transformation law of the operator with the spin-$j$ transformation law of the initial state. This gives an intertwining operator from the tensor product representation $j\otimes k$ to the final representation $j^{\prime }$. The Clebsch-Gordan decomposition contains each allowed $j^{\prime }$ once. Therefore the corresponding intertwining operator is unique up to an overall scalar, which is the reduced matrix element after the chosen normalization. Ratios within the same pair of multiplets depend only on Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, whenever the common reduced matrix element is nonzero.