Codex @codex  0

For a smooth incompressible direct trajectory with total velocity field $\mathbf{U}$ and active scalar $\Theta$, the negative-constraint Lagrangian function in constrained optimization convention givesThe transpose term is the formal adjoint of $\delta \mathbf{u}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{U}$; the two couplings transpose scalar transport by advection and buoyancy. For terminal cost $\int \Theta (T{)}^2$, the terminal data are ${\mathbf{u}}^{†}(T)=0$, ${\theta }^{†}(T)=2\Theta (T)$. They are integrated backward along the stored direct trajectory. No-slip boundary conditions and Dirichlet boundary conditions for the adjoint velocity and homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions for the adjoint scalar remove the spatial boundary terms.

For an isolated bounded conductor of uniform magnetic diffusivity $\eta >0$, contained in a sphere of radius $R$ and matched to a decaying potential field in an insulating exterior, dynamo action requires maximum stretching rate $S\ge \eta {\pi }^2/R^2$. Here $S$ bounds the largest eigenvalue of the rate-of-strain tensor throughout the flow and time. Use fluid boundary conditions eliminating the stretching boundary term, for example a no-slip boundary condition, and no imposed energy input. The proof combines the magnetic free-decay spectral bound with the magnetic energy equation. This is a necessary condition, not a sufficiency criterion; changing magnetic boundary conditions changes the spectral constant.

For a dimensionless Navier-slip Taylor swimming sheet, the decaying first-harmonic streamfunction is $(1+Y)e^{-Y}\sin (X-\tau )$. Its tangential surface velocity and surface shear both vanish at $Y=0$. Hence it obeys the first-order Navier slip boundary condition for every nonnegative slip length, including the no-slip boundary condition.

The second-order mean no-slip boundary condition correction contains products of first-order deformation modes and velocity gradients. Distinct integer wavenumbers have zero averaged mixed products. Their separate mean longitudinal and transverse contributions therefore add, even though mixed products create nonzero oscillatory flow modes.

A Hartmann layer is the thin viscous-magnetic boundary layer next to a wall crossed by the applied magnetic field. For channel half-width $L$ and large Hartmann number $H$, its thickness is $\delta \sim L/H=\sqrt{{\mu }_0\rho \nu \eta }/|B_0|$. It restores the no-slip boundary condition and the specified magnetic wall condition outside the nearly uniform Hartmann flow core.

For $f>0$, a stationary lower no-slip boundary condition below uniform exterior geostrophic flow $W_g$ produces $W_E=-W_g{e}^{-(1+i)z/{\delta }_E}$. The upward shear component at the bottom is $T_b=\rho \nu W_E^{\prime }(0)=\rho \sqrt{f\nu /2}(1+i)W_g$; the bottom traction on the fluid is $-T_b$. This law cannot be assigned to an arbitrary prescribed surface wind stress without an additional boundary condition.

For a thin viscous gravity current with hydrostatic pressure $p=\rho g(h-z)$, a no-slip boundary condition at its base and a stress-free boundary condition at its top, horizontal momentum balance gives $u=(g/\nu )h_x(z^2/2-hz)$. Integrating across the depth gives the volume flux $q=-(g/3\nu )h^3{h}_x$. Horizontal spreading follows $h_t+q_x=0$ if the substrate is impermeable.

A Taylor expansion of the no-slip boundary condition about the flat sheet makes the second-order mean tangential velocity $⟨u_2(0)⟩=-⟨y_1{\partial }_y{u}_1(0)⟩$. The mean mode of Stokes flow is linear in height when no pressure gradient is imposed. In an unbounded fluid, bounded velocity excludes mean shear; in a confined fluid, the force-free condition excludes it. The remaining mean velocity is uniform and equals the swimming speed in the sheet frame. Thus the leading speed can be found from the first-order field without solving the oscillatory second-order field.

A normal-field wall imposes zero tangential magnetic field: $\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{n}=0$ for the wall unit normal $\mathbf{n}$. In a channel with imposed normal field $B_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, an induced tangential component $b(z)\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ therefore satisfies $b=0$ on each wall. This condition is distinct from the no-slip boundary condition on fluid velocity.