An eigenvalue of a matrix is a scalar for which for some nonzero eigenvector . Its corresponding eigenspace is
Write . The displayed matrix is the outer product , so
Its column space is contained in and is nonzero because . Hence is a rank-one matrix.
The vector is an eigenvector with eigenvalue , and every vector in the orthogonal complement has eigenvalue . Thus
Since is a direct sum of these eigenspaces, has an eigenbasis and is therefore a diagonalizable.
The normalizer of in is
It is the stabilizer of the subgroup under the conjugation action of on its subgroups.
Take . Since is a normal subgroup, ; it has the same order as , so it is also a Sylow subgroup of . The conjugacy assertion in the Sylow theorems supplies such that
Consequently , and therefore
Thus , while the reverse inclusion is immediate because both factors are subgroups of . Hence
A sequence of functions converges uniformly to when, for every , there is an such that
for every . Equivalently, in the supremum norm.
Yes. Fix and . Uniform convergence gives such that for every . Since the continuous function is continuous at , there is a such that implies . The triangle inequality then gives
This proves the uniform limit theorem: is continuous.
No. For each , , whereas for every . The pointwise limit on is therefore
This limit is not continuous at . Since every is continuous, the uniform limit theorem rules out uniform convergence. Directly, for , whose supremum over is for every .
No. Define
Each is a differentiable function on , while
Thus converges uniformly to the absolute value function , which is not differentiable at . Uniform convergence alone therefore does not preserve differentiability.
The Cauchy integral formula says that if is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the closed disc , then for ,
In particular, at the centre,
for every .
If , the assumed bound gives , so . Otherwise define . Then and . Applying the centre formula and taking real parts gives
The continuous nonnegative function has integral zero, so it vanishes around the circle. Equality together with forces . This holds for every , hence throughout the disc. This is the equality case underlying the maximum modulus principle.
Introduce the Cauchy approximate identity
It is an approximate identity converging to the Dirac delta function , and . For a smooth rapidly decaying test function , integration by parts gives
By the definition of the derivative of the Dirac delta, . Therefore the limit as a distribution is
For a wavefunction , the probability density and probability current are
Multiply the Schrodinger equation by , multiply its complex conjugate by , and subtract. The real potential energy terms cancel, leaving
which is the probability continuity equation .
For a stationary state, , so and is constant in space. A normalizable wavefunction has vanishing current at spatial infinity, forcing this constant to be zero. By contrast the nonnormalizable plane wave
has stationary density and nonzero current
when .
The momentum operator in the position representation is . Differentiating the given Gaussian wave packet gives
The probability density is an even function, so the term proportional to the odd function has integral zero. Normalization supplies , and hence
In vacuum the Maxwell equations are
Substitution of the complex plane electromagnetic wave amplitudes into these equations gives
Thus the electric field must be transverse to ; taking the positive-frequency branch gives .
For , , and , the real fields are
The electric vector rotates with constant magnitude, so this is circular polarization. Its Poynting vector is
The Poynting vector is the electromagnetic energy flux: its direction is the direction of propagation and its magnitude is the power crossing unit area.
Gaussian elimination without row exchanges gives the LU decomposition
Because has unit diagonal and is upper triangular,
Solving the two triangular systems gives
and
Let be the number of returns to after time . Since is a recurrent state, the probability of another return after each visit is one. By the stated geometric distribution description, for every positive integer . Thus almost surely and .
On the other hand, writing each visit as an indicator random variable and applying the monotone convergence theorem to the partial sums gives
The left side is infinite, proving the recurrence criterion by return probabilities in the required direction:
By independence of the two simple random walks, linearity of expectation, and symmetry of their transition probabilities,
The Chapman-Kolmogorov equation identifies the inner sum as , so
A simple random walk on the integer line can return to only at an even time. Since it is recurrent at , part (a) gives
Therefore .
For , define by . If , then in particular
so . Thus is injective. Since a finite-dimensional vector space and its dual space have the same dimension, is also surjective and hence an isomorphism. This is the finite-dimensional real case of the Riesz representation theorem.
The adjoint operator of is the unique linear map satisfying
for every and . In the stated orthonormal bases, if and denote coordinate columns, then
Therefore the matrix of is the matrix transpose .
For ,
Hence . Taking orthogonal complements in the finite-dimensional space proves the image-kernel orthogonality for an adjoint
Put . For any ,
This is minimized at exactly when , equivalently when . Thus the normal equation for a linear inverse problem is
For the given linear least-squares problem,
The normal equations and have the unique solution
A Smith normal form of an matrix over a principal ideal domain is a diagonal matrix
where and . It is guaranteed to exist for every matrix over a principal ideal domain. The entries are determined up to multiplication by units; over they are conventionally chosen positive.
Present a finitely generated abelian group as the cokernel of an integer matrix . Changing by the invertible row and column operations used in its Smith normal form does not change the isomorphism type of the cokernel. If
then
where factors with may be omitted. This is the Fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups; the rank of an abelian group and invariant factors are unique.
There are
such conjugacy classes. Every matrix in is an invertible matrix, so by the minimal polynomial of an invertible matrix its minimal polynomial must have nonzero constant term. But
has constant term zero and cannot be the minimal polynomial of an invertible matrix.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in a compact metric space . By sequential compactness of a compact metric space, it has a convergent subsequence . Given , choose such that whenever , and then choose such that and . For every , the triangle inequality gives
Thus the whole sequence converges to . Every Cauchy sequence converges in , so is a complete metric space.
No. Give an infinite set the discrete metric
This space is bounded. Every Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, so it is complete. However, the open cover by the singleton balls has no finite subcover. Hence is not compact.
For any , the balls form an open cover of the compact metric space . Compactness supplies a finite subcover
This is exactly total boundedness.
Let be any sequence in a complete, totally bounded metric space . Cover by finitely many balls of radius ; one contains infinitely many terms. From those terms choose an infinite subsequence lying in one ball of radius , and continue. The diagonal argument produces a subsequence whose tail from its th term onward lies in a ball of radius . Hence
whenever , so the subsequence is Cauchy. Completeness makes it converge in .
Every sequence in therefore has a convergent subsequence, so is sequentially compact. Sequential compactness is equivalent to compactness for metric spaces, and thus is compact. This proves that a complete totally bounded metric space is compact.
The space is not compact because it is not complete. For , define the continuous function
These functions converge in the L1 norm to the step function , because is supported on an interval of length and bounded in absolute value by one. They are consequently Cauchy for the metric , since for sufficiently close pairs the outer minimum with does nothing.
If converged in this metric to some , it would also converge to in . Uniqueness of an limit would give almost everywhere. Continuity would then force on and on , which is impossible at . Thus this Cauchy sequence has no limit in , while every compact metric space is complete.
If , the subspace topology on is
If is an equivalence relation on and is the natural projection, the quotient topology declares open exactly when is open in . For topological spaces and , the product topology on has as a basis all sets with open in and open in .
A closed set is compact because it is closed in the compact space . Its image is compact by the fact that a continuous image of a compact space is compact, and every compact subset of the Hausdorff space is closed. Thus the continuous bijection is a closed map. Its inverse is consequently continuous, so is a homeomorphism. This is the compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem.
Define a continuous map by the standard embedded torus of revolution parametrization
Its image lies in because
The periodicity of the trigonometric functions makes and , so is constant on every -equivalence class. The universal property of the quotient topology therefore gives a unique continuous map
Every point of has cylindrical radius between and , so its polar angle determines modulo one, while the pair on the unit circle determines modulo one. Hence is surjective, and two parameters have the same image exactly when they differ by the endpoint identifications defining ; thus it is injective.
The quotient is compact as the continuous image of the given compact space under the quotient map. The surface is Hausdorff because it has the subspace topology inherited from . The compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem now shows that is a homeomorphism. Therefore
The Bromwich inversion formula gives
For , close the Bromwich contour in the left half-plane. The only enclosed singularity is the double pole at , whose residue is
The residue theorem therefore yields
Taking the Laplace transform in and using the initial condition , the radial heat equation in three dimensions becomes
Put and . Then
so
Finiteness at the centre forces .
The transformed boundary condition is
Since
substitution and cancellation of the two terms gives
Hence
and the required explicit transform is
Taking and using gives
Set . The Taylor series of the denominator is
Consequently
The singular part at is therefore
Using long-time asymptotics from a Laplace transform and part (a), the centre temperature has late-time behaviour
The group
acts on the Poincare half-plane model by
A direct calculation gives
Therefore
so every element of PSL2(R) is an isometry of the hyperbolic metric.
A Geodesic in the Poincare half-plane model is a vertical line or a semicircle orthogonal to the real axis. Given a hyperbolic line , choose a real Möbius transformation sending its two ideal endpoints to and . After multiplying its representing matrix by a scalar and, if necessary, changing its sign, it represents an element of and sends to the positive imaginary axis .
The chosen point then maps to for some . The dilation , represented by
fixes and sends to . Thus every pointed line can be sent to , proving transitivity on pointed hyperbolic lines.
An orientation-preserving isometry fixing every point of fixes more than two points in the upper half-plane and hence, as a Möbius transformation, is the identity. The map
fixes pointwise and preserves the hyperbolic metric; it is the hyperbolic reflection in . Consequently the pointwise stabilizer is exactly
For any isometry , use part (a) to choose that agrees with on one pointed line and its tangent direction. Then fixes that line pointwise, so it is either the identity or its reflection. Hence the Isometry group of the Poincare half-plane consists of
and
with real coefficients, modulo multiplication of all four coefficients by a nonzero scalar.
Because the half-plane metric is a conformal rescaling of the Euclidean metric, its angles are Euclidean angles. For each , the hyperbolic lines meeting the imaginary axis at a fixed angle at are the Euclidean circles
where denotes the vertical coordinate. These circles have centres on the real axis and are therefore hyperbolic lines; varying gives the required collection.
To construct a triangle, put one vertex at and a second at on , with . Draw from these vertices the lines making interior angles and with . Their Euclidean centres and radii are
If their other intersection has angle , the law of cosines in the Euclidean triangle formed by the two centres and that intersection gives
Equivalently,
The right side is greater than one exactly when . Since ranges continuously and strictly increasingly from to infinity for , such a exists. The three lines therefore bound a hyperbolic triangle with the prescribed angles.
Yes. By an element of , part (a) puts the side between the - and -vertices on and the first vertex at . A reflection if needed puts the triangle on the chosen side. The remaining freedom is the ratio of the heights of the second and first vertices, and the equation from part (c) determines it uniquely because is strictly increasing on . The two incident circles are then fixed, so their other intersection and the triangle are fixed. Thus triangles with the same three angles are isometric, which is Hyperbolic AAA congruence.
Write the admissible variation as , where at both ends. Differentiating the functional under the integral sign gives the first variation
After integration by parts, with the boundary term vanishing,
Thus the Euler-Lagrange equation is
A second differentiation gives the second variation
The integrand
is nonnegative, so . If , both continuous summands vanish everywhere. Hence , so is constant; the common boundary value forces . Conversely, has and , so . Therefore
This agrees with part (a): at , the first variation vanishes because , and
Thus the constant configuration is a stationary local minimum as well as the global minimum identified directly.
For , completing the square gives the Bogomolny bound
Consequently
with equality exactly when the Bogomolny equation
holds everywhere. Separating variables, or differentiating the proposed form directly, gives all solutions with the required limits:
These are the translated phi-four kinks.
Differentiating the first-order equation yields
which is precisely the Euler-Lagrange equation from part (a). Thus every configuration saturating the first-order bound is automatically a stationary solution of the second-order variational equation.
Let . Repeated integration by parts gives the formal adjoint rules
Therefore
Equality of the coefficients of in and requires
so . This also makes the zeroth-order coefficients equal because . Hence, under boundary conditions that remove the boundary terms,
This is the self-adjoint fourth-order scalar differential operator .
With and , the equation is
Multiply by the real eigenfunction and integrate over . The clamped boundary conditions at both endpoints eliminate all boundary terms, so
Since , the right side is a sum of nonnegative terms. It cannot vanish for a nonzero eigenfunction: if , the boundary conditions force . Thus
For and , the linear ordinary differential equation is , whose general solution is
By the stated parity reduction, an even eigenfunction has the form . The conditions have a nonzero solution exactly when
that is,
An odd eigenfunction has the form , and the corresponding determinant gives
Thus is an eigenvalue precisely under one of the two stated conditions.
Figure 1.
The fourth-order eigenvalue condition and its roots
.
For the minus sign, division by away from gives . On , for , while on their signs differ, so there is no root. For the plus sign the equation is
There is no root in . On , the function increases strictly from to , so it has exactly one root by the intermediate value theorem. Numerically,
Hence the combined condition has exactly one solution in .
The constant is the positive Coriolis parameter at northern latitude , is the gravitational acceleration, and is the undisturbed mean depth of the layer.
The linearized shallow water equations assume a homogeneous, incompressible, inviscid layer over a flat bed; a horizontal scale much larger than the depth, so the shallow-water approximation and hydrostatic approximation apply; depth-independent horizontal velocity; a free-surface displacement and sufficiently small velocity to neglect nonlinear products; and an f-plane on which is constant. The equations also omit viscosity, forcing, and bottom topography.
The vertical relative vorticity is
Differentiate the -momentum equation with respect to and the -momentum equation with respect to , then subtract. The mixed pressure derivatives cancel, giving
The mass-conservation equation says . Therefore the linearized shallow-water potential vorticity
satisfies
Thus
For a steady flow independent of , geostrophic balance gives
Hence , and the definition of becomes
Equivalently,
With the Rossby deformation radius , the bounded solution for the stated potential-vorticity step is
Continuity of and at gives
Therefore
and
When , the surface height increases smoothly from to , while is a positive eastward jet with its maximum at the discontinuity and exponential decay on the Rossby-radius scale:
Write
and assume so that is identifiable.
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 117 total.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.