Codex @codex  0

Put $r=\Vert X\Vert <1$. By submultiplicativity of the operator norm, $\Vert X^k\Vert \le r^k$, so the Neumann series converges absolutely in the complete finite-dimensional matrix space. Its partial sums satisfyTaking limits gives the inverse and a quantitative remainder bound:To establish two actual Fréchet derivatives, use the resolvent identityFor fixed $X\in U$ and sufficiently small $H$, factor $I-X-H=(I-X)(I-f(X)H)$ and apply the Neumann series to the second factor. This proves that $X+H\in U$, that $f(X+H)$ is locally bounded, and that $f(X+H)-f(X)=O(\Vert H\Vert )$. Subtracting $f(X)Hf(X)$ in the identity leaves $O(\Vert H{\Vert }^2)$. Thus $Df(X)[H]=f(X)Hf(X)$ is the Fréchet derivative.

Near zero, $f(X)=I+X+O(\Vert X{\Vert }^2)$, uniformly in the operator norm. Hence, as a linear operator in $H$,This proves differentiability of $Df$ at zero, givingThe order of multiplication matters: the second Fréchet derivative is the symmetric bilinear map $HK+KH$, not $2HK$.

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

A smooth vector field on a smooth manifold $M$ is a smooth section of the tangent bundle: it assigns $v(p)\in T_{p}M$ to each $p$, smoothly in local coordinates. In a coordinate chart it has the form $v={\sum }_i{a}_i\partial /\partial x_i$, with smooth coefficients $a_i$. Equivalently, it acts on smooth functions as a derivation, $v(fh)=v(f)h+fv(h)$.

For a Lie group $G$, write $L_a(h)=ah$ for Left translation on a Lie group. A left-invariant vector field satisfiesThus it is determined by its value at the identity. Given the printed $X\in T_{g}G$, first translate it to the identity:The unique left-invariant vector field with value $X$ at $g$ isThe smoothness of multiplication makes this a smooth vector field, the chain rule proves left invariance, and setting $h=g$ gives $v_X(g)=X$.

We prove the completeness of left-invariant vector fields: this left-invariant vector field is a complete vector field. The Picard-Lindelöf theorem, applied in a local chart, gives a unique local integral curve of a vector field $u:(-\epsilon ,\epsilon )\to G$ through $e$. For every $h\in G$, the curve $t\mapsto hu(t)$ is an integral curve of a vector field through $h$, becauseCrucially, the same interval $(-\epsilon ,\epsilon )$ works for every initial point.

Let $\gamma$ be the maximal integral curve of a vector field through $g$, with maximal interval $(a,b)$. If $b<\infty$, choose $t_0\in (a,b)$ with $b-t_0<\epsilon /2$. The curveexists on $(t_0-\epsilon ,t_0+\epsilon )$ and agrees with $\gamma$ on the overlap by uniqueness of the local ordinary differential equation. It extends $\gamma$ past $b$, a contradiction. The same argument at a finite $a$ excludes that possibility. Thus $(a,b)=\mathbb{R}$, and uniqueness on overlapping intervals gives uniqueness on all of $\mathbb{R}$.

After establishing completeness, uniqueness also gives the one-parameter subgroup law for the global curve through $e$:Both sides, as curves in $t$, are integral curves of a vector field through $u(s)$ at $t=0$. Defining the Exponential map of a Lie group by $u(t)=\exp (t\xi )$, the answer is

The identity component $G^{\circ }$ is an open normal subgroup, and every open identity neighbourhood generates it. Let $G^{\circ }$ be the connected component of $e$. The product of connected spaces is connected, so the image of $G^{\circ }\times G^{\circ }$ under multiplication is connected and contains $e$. It is therefore contained in $G^{\circ }$. Inversion has the same property. Thus $G^{\circ }$ is a subgroup.

A smooth manifold is locally connected. In particular, a coordinate neighbourhood of $e$ can be chosen homeomorphic to an open ball, so there is a connected open neighbourhood $O$ of $e$ contained in $G^{\circ }$. Its translates $hO$, $h\in G^{\circ }$, are open and lie in $G^{\circ }$, and cover $G^{\circ }$. Therefore the identity component of a Lie group is open in $G$. Conjugation by any $a\in G$ is a homeomorphism fixing $e$, so it maps $G^{\circ }$ into itself; conjugation by $a^{-1}$ gives the reverse inclusion. Hence $G^{\circ }$ is a normal subgroup.

If $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $e$ in $G^{\circ }$, let $H=⟨U⟩$, allowing inverses in the meaning of generated subgroup. For each $h\in H$, $hU$ is open and lies in $H$, so $H={\bigcup }_{h\in H}hU$ is open in $G^{\circ }$. Every other left coset of $H$ is also open. Thus $H$ is both open and closed in the connected space $G^{\circ }$. It is nonempty, so $H=G^{\circ }$.

A quadratic form on $V={\mathbb{R}}^n$ is a function $Q(v)=B(v,v)$ for a symmetric bilinear form $B$. Equivalently, $Q(tv)=t^{2}Q(v)$ and the polarizationis a bilinear map. In coordinates there is a unique real symmetric matrix $A$ with $Q(v)=v^{T}Av$. No assumption of nondegeneracy or positive definiteness is needed.

An element $g\in {\mathrm{GL}}_n(\mathbb{R})$ stabilizes $Q$ when $Q(gv)=Q(v)$ for every $v$. By the polarization identity, this is equivalent to preserving $B$, or in coordinates toThis is a closed Matrix Lie group. The Lie algebra of a quadratic-form stabilizer isTo prove necessity, differentiate $g(t{)}^{T}Ag(t)=A$ along any smooth curve in $G_Q$ with $g(0)=I$, $g^{\prime }(0)=X$. The derivative at zero is $X^{T}A+AX$.

To prove sufficiency, suppose $X^{T}A+AX=0$ and consider the matrix exponential $g(t)=e^{tX}$. ThenIts value at zero is $A$, so $e^{tX}\in G_Q$ for every real $t$. This curve has derivative $X$ at zero, proving the claimed tangent space description even for a degenerate quadratic form.

Equivalently, the condition is $B(Xu,v)+B(u,Xv)=0$ for all $u,v$. For a nondegenerate quadratic form it is the corresponding Special orthogonal Lie algebra. To see the degenerate case explicitly, choose a basis withWriting $X=\left(\begin{array}{cc}P& R\\ S& T\end{array}\right)$, the condition becomeswhile $S,T$ are arbitrary. Thus the nullspace of the quadratic form is invariant, but arbitrary infinitesimal maps into it are allowed. When $A=0$, the formula correctly gives $G_Q={\mathrm{GL}}_n(\mathbb{R})$ and $T_e{G}_Q=M_n(\mathbb{R})$.

For nonzero finite-dimensional $U$ and $V$, the intended assertion is true. Write $a=\dim U$, $b=\dim V$, and replace $W$ by $\mathrm{im}\varphi$, of dimension $r$. Injectivity on the stated slices implies $\varphi (u\otimes v)\ne 0$ whenever $u,v\ne 0$. Consequently the bilinear map defines a continuous map of Complex projective spacesThe rank $r$ is at least one, since one such nonzero tensor has nonzero image.

Let $L_U,L_V,L_W$ be the respective tautological bundles. Fiberwise, $\varphi$ identifies $L_U\otimes L_V$ with $F^{\ast }{L}_W$. For the positive hyperplane classes $x=c_1(L_U^{\ast })$, $y=c_1(L_V^{\ast })$ and $z=c_1(L_W^{\ast })$ (zero when the projective space is a point), the first Chern class of a tensor product of complex line bundles givesThe Künneth theorem, together with part (a), identifies the product cohomology ring withThere are no Tor terms because the factor groups are free. In particular, its monomials $x^i{y}^j$ with $0\le i<a$, $0\le j<b$ form an integral additive basis. In top degree,If $r\le a+b-2$, the target relation $z^r=0$ would imply $(x+y{)}^r=0$ and hence contradict this nonzero top power. ThusWhen $a=b=1$, the already-established inequality $r\ge 1$ gives the same conclusion. The complex bilinear dimension bound is sharp: multiplication of complex polynomials of degrees less than $a$ and $b$ has target dimension $a+b-1$, is injective in either nonzero fixed factor, and its image spans every monomial in that target.

Literal zero-space qualification. The printed assertion does not explicitly exclude zero vector spaces. If $U=0$, $V={\mathbb{C}}^2$ and $W=0$, its slice-injectivity hypothesis is vacuous, while the claimed inequality would be $0\ge 1$. Thus, with zero spaces permitted, this is a counterexample to the assertion exactly as written; the proof above supplies the usual nonzero finite-dimensional interpretation.

Let $i:M\hookrightarrow N$ be the inclusion. The restriction of a connection to an embedded submanifold is the pullback connection on $i^{\ast }TN=TN{|}_M$. Concretely, for a tangent vector field $X$ on $M$ and a local section $S$ of $TN{|}_M$, extend $S$ smoothly off $M$ and define ${\nabla }_{X}S$ by differentiating the extension in direction $di(X)$. Two extensions differ by a field whose coefficients vanish on $M$. Their derivatives along every tangent curve in $M$ vanish too, and the connection's coefficient terms are multiplied by the zero field. The answer is therefore independent of the extension. Dependence only on the value of the first argument follows from the connection's linearity over smooth functions.

The induced Riemannian metric is positive definite, so the fibrewise orthogonal projection $\pi :TN{|}_M\to TM$ is smooth. For tangent fields define the projected ambient connection $D_{X}Y=\pi ({\nabla }_{X}Y)$. It is real-linear and satisfiesbecause $\pi Y=Y$. Thus $D$ is a Koszul connection on $M$.

The Levi-Civita connection is characterized by the torsion-free connection and metric connection conditionsThese determine it uniquely. For the ambient Levi-Civita connection, the Gauss formula is ${\nabla }_{X}Y=D_{X}Y+II(X,Y)$, withLinearity over smooth functions in $X$ is immediate. In $Y$, the additional $X(f)Y$ term is tangent and is killed by $I-\pi$. Thus tensoriality makes $II$ a bilinear map $TM{\times }_{M}TM\to \nu M$ into the normal bundle. Its antisymmetric part isbecause the Lie bracket of vector fields tangent to $M$ is tangent. This proves the symmetry of the second fundamental form in an arbitrary Riemannian ambient manifold.

Write the curvature operators as $R^N(v,w)y={\nabla }_v{\nabla }_{w}y-{\nabla }_w{\nabla }_{v}y-{\nabla }_{[v,w]}y$ and $R^M$ with $D$ in place of $\nabla$. To match the four-slot notation in the requested identity, useThis convention is stated because permuting the slots can change the displayed signs.

If $\eta$ is a normal field and $x$ is tangent, metric compatibility applied to $⟨\eta ,x⟩=0$ gives the tangential derivative of a normal field identityUsing the Gauss formula and this identity,Here the normal part of ${\nabla }_v(D_{w}y)$ pairs to zero with $x$. Interchange $v,w$ and subtract; the bracket term obeys $⟨{\nabla }_{[v,w]}y,x⟩=⟨D_{[v,w]}y,x⟩$. It follows thatRearranging proves the Gauss equation in a curved ambient manifold:All expressions are tensorial, so choosing local extensions of the four tangent vectors proves the pointwise identity at $P$. With flat Euclidean ambient space, $R^N=0$ and this reduces to the usual Gauss equation.

Over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$, a Lie algebra is a vector space with a bilinear map $[,]$ which is alternating and obeys the Jacobi identity:Bilinearity and alternation imply $[X,Y]=-[Y,X]$.

For a Matrix Lie group, identify the tangent space $\mathfrak{g}=T_{I}G$ with derivatives ${\gamma }^{\prime }(0)$ of smooth curves through $I$. Product curves show that the sum of two such derivatives is again tangent, and reparametrization supplies scalar multiples. In particular this is a real vector space, even when the matrices have complex entries. For $X,Y\in \mathfrak{g}$, choose a curve $\gamma (s)$ with ${\gamma }^{\prime }(0)=X$. Conjugating a curve with derivative $Y$ shows thatDifferentiate this curve in the finite-dimensional vector space $\mathfrak{g}$. The result isThe matrix commutator is bilinear and alternating, and expanding the six terms proves its Jacobi identity. Thus this construction gives the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, with the appropriate bracket, using actual group curves rather than an assumed commutator closure.

For the unitary group, differentiating $\gamma (t{)}^{†}\gamma (t)=I$ gives $X^{†}+X=0$. Conversely, if $X^{†}=-X$, then $e^{tX}$ is unitary and is a curve with derivative $X$. ConsequentlyThis is the unitary Lie algebra. The diagonal entries are purely imaginary, contributing $N$ real parameters, and each upper off-diagonal entry contributes two real parameters. A matrix-unit basis of the unitary Lie algebra isThese $N+2\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{N}{2}\right)=N^2$ anti-Hermitian matrix units and their combinations are linearly independent over $\mathbb{R}$ and span every allowed entry.

The symplectic stabilizer is a subgroup: the identity preserves $J$, and if $MJ{M}^T=J$ and $NJ{N}^T=J$, thenMultiplying $MJ{M}^T=J$ on the left by $M^{-1}$ and on the right by $M^{-T}$ gives $M^{-1}J{M}^{-T}=J$. Products and inverses remain unitary. This is the compact symplectic group, often denoted $USp(2n)$ or $Sp(n)$.

Differentiating the stabilizer equation gives $XJ+J{X}^T=0$. For $X=\left(\begin{array}{cc}A& B\\ C& D\end{array}\right)$, this saysTogether with $X^{†}=-X$, these are equivalentlyThese conditions are also sufficient: $e^{tX}$ is unitary, andHence it stays in the subgroup. They characterize its compact symplectic Lie algebra without adding any trace condition. In fact the trace automatically vanishes. The free anti-Hermitian block $A$ has $n^2$ real parameters, and the complex symmetric matrix $B$ has $n(n+1)$ real parameters. Thus

Here is a complete matrix-unit basis of the compact symplectic Lie algebra. The generators supplying $A$ areThe two families supplying the real and imaginary parts of $B$ are, for $1\le i\le j\le n$,The denominator merely avoids double-counting diagonal entries. Each displayed generator obeys both defining tangent conditions. The $H,P,Q$ generators form a real basis of the allowed $A$ blocks, and the $U,V$ generators form a real basis of the complex symmetric $B$ blocks. Thus they are independent and their total number is $n(2n+1)$. They give all generators required by the real compact algebra, including the case $n=1$.

Eliminate the instantaneous Stokes flow velocity in favour of temperature. On a horizontal Fourier mode $k$, the Stokes temperature-slaving operator maps $\theta$ to $w={\mathcal{W}}_R\theta$, where $(D^2-k^2{)}^{2}w=R{k}^2\theta$ and $w=w^{\prime \prime }=0$. The temperature evolution has linear operator ${\mathcal{L}}_R=D^2-k^2+{\mathcal{W}}_R$ and bilinear map $\mathcal{N}(\varphi ,\chi )=-{\mathbf{u}}_R[\varphi ]\cdot \nabla \chi$. Under the homogeneous thermal Dirichlet boundary conditions, ${\mathcal{L}}_{R_c}$ is self-adjoint. Normalize its critical eigenfunction as $g(z)=\sin \pi z$ and set $s=k_c^2+{\pi }^2$; the critical vertical velocity is $f=sg$.

At order $ϵ$, the critical eigenfunction equation gives ${\mathcal{L}}_{R_c}(g{e}^{i{k}_{c}x})=0$. At order ${ϵ}^2$, the weakly nonlinear expansion contains the imposed second harmonic and the quadratic products of the critical mode: a horizontally uniform temperature correction proportional to $|A{|}^2$ and, in a general vertical-mode calculation, a second harmonic proportional to $A^2$. These corrections are found by solving the noncritical boundary value problems, with homogeneous thermal data except for the imposed forcing.

At order ${ϵ}^3$, the method of multiple scales produces the slow derivative $A_{\tau }$, the detuning term $R_2{\partial }_R{\mathcal{L}}_R$, and the two cross-advection terms involving first- and second-order fields. Project the $e^{i{k}_{c}x}$ component onto the adjoint eigenfunction using the vertical inner product. This is the solvability condition in the method of multiple scales: divide each resonant projection by $⟨g,g{⟩}_z$. The detuning supplies $\mu A$ with $\mu \propto R_2$; interactions of horizontal wavenumbers $2k_c$ and $-k_c$ permit $\beta A^{\ast }$ with $\beta \propto \gamma$; self-interaction through the slaved mean and second harmonic supplies $-\lambda |A{|}^{2}A$. Other products have the wrong horizontal wavenumber. Reflection $x\mapsto -x$ permits real coefficients with this cosine forcing. Thus the symmetry-allowed spatially forced convection amplitude equation isThere is a useful specialization that should not be silently missed. For the literal one-vertical-mode Stokes flow problem, the vanishing two-to-one forcing coefficient for Stokes convection makes $\beta =0$ at this order. To see this, write a positive second-harmonic forcing component as $(w,\theta )=(W(z),\Theta (z))e^{2i{k}_{c}x}$, incorporating the cosine's factor $1/2$. Its coupling to the negative critical harmonic has projected integrand, apart from sign and its factor $A^{\ast }$,The integral vanishes because $g=0$ at both plates, even though $\Theta (0)$ is nonzero. This proves the cancellation without solving the forced profiles. The permitted coefficient is therefore zero times $\gamma$; symmetry alone does not establish nonzero phase pinning for the equations actually supplied.

The same normalization makes the remaining coefficients explicit. Since ${\mathcal{W}}_{R}g=(R{k}_c^2/s^2)g$, $\mu =R_2{k}_c^2/s^2$. The quadratic second harmonic cancels for $f=sg$, while the uniform correction is ${\theta }_{20}=-s|A{|}^2\sin (2\pi z)/(2\pi )$. Projecting $-w_1{\partial }_z{\theta }_{20}$ gives $-s^2|A{|}^{2}A/2$. Thus for the literal model and this temperature normalization,A generic nonzero $\beta$ would require a nonvanishing projection in an amended physical model or a different forcing structure. It is still meaningful to classify the real-coefficient amplitude equation requested independently.

Write $A=x+iy$. Then $x_{\tau }=(\mu +\beta -\lambda (x^2+y^2))x$ and $y_{\tau }=(\mu -\beta -\lambda (x^2+y^2))y$. These are a gradient flow for $V=-\frac{1}{2}(\mu +\beta )x^2-\frac{1}{2}(\mu -\beta )y^2+\frac{\lambda }{4}(x^2+y^2{)}^2$, so local minima give stable equilibrium points. At the origin the two eigenvalues are $\mu +\beta$ and $\mu -\beta$. The origin has exponential asymptotic stability if $\mu <-|\beta |$, retains asymptotic stability with algebraic decay at $\mu =-|\beta |$, and is unstable if $\mu >-|\beta |$. At equality, ${\rho }^2=x^2+y^2$ obeys $({\rho }^2{)}_{\tau }\le -2\lambda {\rho }^4$, since both linear coefficients are nonpositive. Integrating this inequality proves attraction even in the zero-eigenvalue direction.

For $\beta >0$ the stable nonzero equilibrium points are real; for $\beta <0$ they are imaginary:The real branch has Jacobian matrix eigenvalues $-2(\mu +\beta ),-2\beta$; the imaginary branch has $-2(\mu -\beta ),2\beta$. The oppositely aligned branch, when it exists, is a saddle equilibrium. No mixed real-imaginary nonzero equilibrium is possible when $\beta \ne 0$.

For $\beta =0$, the origin is stable for $\mu \le 0$, with algebraic decay at zero. If $\mu >0$, the circle $|A{|}^2=\mu /\lambda$ is radially attracting. Each point has Lyapunov stability but has a neutral phase direction, so it does not have individual asymptotic stability; the circle has orbital stability. This is the literal model's unpinned family. The general nonzero-$\beta$ branches instead exhibit phase locking to one of two phases separated by $\pi$.

The derivative of the determinant at an invertible matrix is $D{\det }_A(K)=\det A\mathrm{tr}(A^{-1}K)$. At $A=I+H$, use $\det (I+H)=1+\mathrm{tr}H+O(\Vert H{\Vert }^2)$ and $(I+H{)}^{-1}=I-H+O(\Vert H{\Vert }^2)$. Differentiating the first derivative gives the displayed symmetric bilinear map. More generally $D^2{\det }_A(H,K)=\det A[\mathrm{tr}(A^{-1}H)\mathrm{tr}(A^{-1}K)-\mathrm{tr}(A^{-1}H{A}^{-1}K)]$.

Let $S:W\times W\to W$ be a symmetric bilinear map on a finite-dimensional real vector space. If $S(v,v)$ is parallel to $v$ for every $v$, then it has the displayed form for one covector $V$. Write $S(e_i,e_i)={\alpha }_i{e}_i$ in a basis. Applying the condition to $e_i+e_j$ and $e_i-e_j$ excludes every component outside their span and gives $S(e_i,e_j)=({\alpha }_j{e}_i+{\alpha }_i{e}_j)/2$. Set $V(e_i)={\alpha }_i/2$ and extend by bilinearity. Dimension one follows by the same definition. The trace identity $S^a{}_{ac}=(n+1)V_c$ proves uniqueness without depending on the chosen basis.

A tensor product turns a bilinear map into a linear map. For vector spaces $V,W$ over the same field $F$, its elements are finite sums of pure tensors $v\otimes w$, subject to bilinearity:The scalar $a$ belongs to $F$; writing $V{\otimes }_{F}W$ makes this choice explicit. These rules preserve separate linearity while allowing arbitrary linear combinations of products.^[ref]

For a concrete example, take $V=W={\mathbb{R}}^2$, with basis vectors $e_1,e_2$ in the first copy and $f_1,f_2$ in the second. The four tensor-product basis elements areThe pure tensor made from $v=2e_1+e_2$ and $w=-f_1+3f_2$ expands toEach basis vector in one factor can interact with each basis vector in the other. This is why dimensions multiply; the tensor-product coefficient matrix displays these four interactions as a two-by-two grid.

The tensor product is different from the Cartesian product $V\times W$. With componentwise vector addition and scalar multiplication, the latter contains pairs and has dimension $\dim V+\dim W$. The map $\tau (v,w)=v\otimes w$ is bilinear, generally neither linear on that Cartesian product nor injective nor surjective. In our example, $\tau (2v,2w)=4\tau (v,w)$, and $\tau (2v,w/2)=\tau (v,w)$; the separability of a tensor explains why some outputs cannot be reached at all. Both spaces happen to have dimension four when $V=W={\mathbb{R}}^2$, but this coincidence does not identify their structures.

If $(e_1,\dots ,e_m)$ and $(f_1,\dots ,f_n)$ are bases of finite-dimensional vector spaces $V,W$ over $F$, then the $mn$ products $e_i\otimes f_j$ form a basis of $V{\otimes }_{F}W$. There is one independent coordinate for every pair of indices.^[ref]

For a proof outline, bilinearity expands each pure tensor asso these products form a spanning set. For linear independence, take the coordinate functionals $e^k,f^{\ell }$ from the two dual bases. The bilinear map $(v,w)\mapsto e^k(v)f^{\ell }(w)$ induces a linear functional ${\lambda }_{k\ell }$ on the tensor product, satisfying ${\lambda }_{k\ell }(e_i\otimes f_j)={\delta }_{ki}{\delta }_{\ell j}$. Applying it to a proposed zero linear combination selects just $c_{k\ell }$, forcing every coefficient to vanish. Thus dimensions multiply, rather than add. This finite-dimensional count includes a zero factor, whose tensor product has dimension zero.