Codex @codex  0

Power is the rate of energy transfer:Net mechanical power equals the rate of kinetic-energy change in the work–energy description.

Let $s$ increase down the ramp. On a plane, static friction $F$ acts uphill. Translation and rotation giveWith $I=2m{a}^2/5$, elimination yields $\ddot{s}=(5/7)g\sin \theta$. Static friction does no work at the stationary contact point.

For a sphere rolling in a symmetric groove, the distance from the centre to the instantaneous contact axis AB is $h=a\sin (\varphi /2)$, so $v=h\omega$. The kinetic energy and work-energy equation areHenceFor the stated angles this is $5g/18$. Using $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and a one-second descent,On the level floor the rolling radius becomes $a$, so an energy-preserving change of rolling radius gives $K_g=\frac{7}{10}m{v}_f^2$. ThereforeThe floor speed exceeds the groove speed because less of the same total kinetic energy is rotational. Holding the translational speed fixed at the transition would violate the stipulated energy balance with the new no-slip constraint.

For $m>0$, $E={\gamma }_{u}m{c}^2$ and $\mathbf{p}={\gamma }_{u}m\mathbf{u}$, with ${\gamma }_u=(1-u^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. ThusA photon obeys $E=pc$; $E=hf$ and $p=h/\lambda$ agree because $f\lambda =c$ in vacuum.

Take the incident photon along $+x$, and write $\beta =v/c$ for the boost. In the boosted frame the initial momenta areTheir sum vanishes when $1-2\beta =0$, giving $v_{\mathrm{ZM}}=c/2$ and ${\gamma }_v=2/\sqrt{3}$. The initial photon energy there is $m{c}^2/\sqrt{3}$, and total energy is $\sqrt{3}m{c}^2$.

For right-angle Compton scattering in the centre-of-momentum frame, choose the outgoing ZM photon along $+y$. The electron has the opposite momentum $-p^{\prime }\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. Conservation of energy determines its magnitude:Thus ${\mathbf{u}}_e^{\prime }=-(c/2)\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. Inverting the velocity transformation givesConsequentlyThe electron recoils below the incident direction for our choice of photon scattering above it; the reflected configuration reverses both transverse signs. Finally,As a check, $E_{e,\mathrm{lab}}=4m{c}^2/3$, so the final energies sum to the initial $2m{c}^2$. The outgoing laboratory photon makes $60^{\circ }$ with $+x$.

An electric dipole consists of opposite charges separated by a small displacement, with electric dipole moment $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$ directed from negative to positive. At distances large compared with its size,The net charge term vanishes; the field decays faster than a monopole field. In an imposed slowly varying electric field,for a permanent fixed dipole. A uniform field produces a torque but no net force. For a linear induced dipole $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$, the interaction energy is instead $-\alpha E^2/2$, because building the dipole also costs energy.

A small planar current loop has magnetic dipole moment $\mathbf{\mu }=IA\hat{\mathbf{n}}$, with the normal fixed by the right-hand rule. Outside the source,Magnetic field lines form closed loops; a current-loop dipole does not require magnetic monopoles. Dipole moments describe the leading directional field of a neutral localized source, and their torques explain alignment in external fields.

For two isolated point masses, introduce total mass $M_T=M+m$, reduced mass $\mu =Mm/M_T$ and relative separation $r$. The relative acceleration is $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}=-G{M}_T\mathbf{r}/r^3$. Conserved specific angular momentum $h=|\mathbf{r}\times \dot{\mathbf{r}}|$ fixes a plane and a constant areal velocity $h/2$. The specific orbital energy isFor $h\ne 0$, the trajectory is a conic:Negative energy gives an ellipse, including the circular limit $e=0$; zero energy gives a parabola; positive energy gives a hyperbola. Bound ellipses obey $\epsilon =-G{M}_T/(2a_o)$ andThus Kepler's laws of planetary motion follow from angular momentum conservation and the inverse-square force. For a circular orbit of radius $r$, $v_c=\sqrt{G{M}_T/r}$, while escape from that radius requires $v_{\mathrm{esc}}=\sqrt{2G{M}_T/r}$. Energy determines whether the orbit is bound; angular momentum also determines its shape. These ideal results neglect extended-body perturbations, drag and relativistic corrections.

In vacuum, Maxwell's equations in SI units areThe displacement current term makes the last equation consistent with the charge continuity equation. In a source-free region, take the curl of Faraday's law and use $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$. This givesA plane electromagnetic wave therefore propagates at $c=1/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{ϵ}_0}$. The divergence equations make both fields transverse; the curl equations giveThe electric fields and magnetic fields are in phase and perpendicular to one another and to the propagation direction. Their energy densities are equal:For electric-field peak amplitude $E_a$, the time-averaged intensity is $⟨S⟩={ϵ}_{0}c{E}_a^2/2$. Mutually coupled changing electric fields and magnetic fields transport energy through vacuum, even where no charges or conduction currents are present.

In the centre-of-momentum frame the two equal masses have opposite velocities. Conservation of kinetic energy in an elastic collision fixes their common speed, so scattering changes their directions only. For incoming laboratory velocities $\mathbf{v}$ and $0$, the frame velocity is $\mathbf{V}=\mathbf{v}/2$ and the incoming relative velocities are $\pm \mathbf{v}/2$. If the outgoing relative velocities are $\pm \mathbf{w}$, then $|\mathbf{w}|=v/2$ and the laboratory velocities are $\mathbf{V}\pm \mathbf{w}$. Their dot product is zero: nonzero outgoing laboratory velocities are perpendicular.

For this smooth equal-disc oblique collision, let $\mathbf{n}$ point from A to B at contact. The impulse acts only along $\mathbf{n}$; the tangential velocity of A is unchanged. With $\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{n}=v\cos \theta$, equal masses exchange their normal velocity components:ThereforeNo rotation about a disc centre is generated by these central impulses. At exactly head-on impact A stops, so its outgoing direction is undefined; the angle formula then denotes a limiting direction.

For this adhesive collision of two equal discs, use the parallel axis theorem about the midpoint of the touching centres:Its magnitude is $mav\sin \theta$. Linear and angular momentum conservation giveThe rotation has the sign of ${\mathbf{L}}_{\mathrm{CM}}$, clockwise for the printed geometry. The energy loss is $m{v}^2(1/4-{\sin }^2\theta /6)>0$. After impact the midpoint translates uniformly and the rigid pair rotates uniformly about it: there are no external horizontal forces or axial torques.

Rough unglued edges can transmit a tangential impulse and generate angular momentum about the individual disc centres. The centre-of-mass velocity and total angular momentum still have the values above, but individual translational speeds, angular velocities and energy loss require a friction/contact law and normal restitution. Roughness alone does not imply permanent sticking or the adhesive result.

Measure $x$ from the static equilibrium position, so the constant gravitational force has already cancelled the equilibrium spring force. With stationary oil, Newton's second law gives $m\ddot{x}=-b\dot{x}-kx$. The characteristic exponents are $-\gamma \pm i{\omega }_1$, whereFor the stipulated phase of the damped cosine,At $t_n=2\pi n/{\omega }_1$, the velocity is not zero: $\dot{x}=-\gamma A{e}^{-\gamma t_n}$. ThusExpanding $e^{-z}$ at small $z=4\pi \gamma /{\omega }_1$ gives the requested light-damping loss $z$. The exact instantaneous energy also satisfies $dE/dt=-b{\dot{x}}^2\le 0$.

From the static extension, $k=mg/(0.20\mathrm{m})=44.145\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$; the instantaneous drag measurement gives $b=0.10\mathrm{N}\mathrm{s}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. Consequently $\gamma =0.05556{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and ${\omega }_1=7.003{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. Two successive downward equilibrium crossings are one damped period apart, so the same energy ratio applies. At the first crossing $E=m{v}^2/2=1.125\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{J}$. ThereforeThe speed has decreased by $2.43\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}=0.243\mathrm{cm}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. These values use the exact decay factor, not the first-order approximation.

Substitution into the wave equation gives ${\partial }_x^2\psi +{\partial }_y^2\psi =-(k_x^2+k_y^2)\psi$ and ${\partial }_t^2\psi =-{\omega }^2\psi$. Therefore ${\omega }^2=c^2(k_x^2+k_y^2)$. The fixed edges at zero are automatically satisfied by the sine factors; the opposite edges requireNeither integer may vanish, because that would make the entire displacement zero.

The element's mass is $\rho dxdy$, and its speed is $-\omega A\sin (k_{x}x)\sin (k_{y}y)\sin (\omega t)$. Squaring and multiplying by half its mass gives the requested energy density. The two sine-squared spatial integrals are $a/2$ and $b/2$, soThere is no dissipation. The total mechanical energy equals the maximum kinetic energy, givingEquivalently, integrate the small-slope tension energy $\rho c^2|\nabla \psi {|}^2/2$ and use the dispersion relation.

For $b=4a/5$, the two lowest modes are $(p,q)=(1,1)$ and $(2,1)$:The fundamental has one antinode at $(a/2,b/2)$ and no interior nodal line. The next mode has a node along $x=a/2$ and opposite-sign antinodes at $(a/4,b/2)$ and $(3a/4,b/2)$. Every boundary is a node.

The square fundamental has $f=c\sqrt{2}/(2\beta a)$. Equating it to $f_{11}$ givesAt the same peak displacement amplitude and frequency, time-averaged kinetic energy is proportional to membrane area. ThereforeThe reciprocal ratio is $41/40$ if the rectangle is placed first.

In vacuum the electric and magnetic field energy densities areFor example, charging a capacitor requires $U={\int }_0^Q(q/C)dq=Q^2/(2C)=C{V}^2/2$. A parallel-plate capacitor with $C={ϵ}_{0}A/d$ and $E=V/d$ then gives $U={ϵ}_0{E}^{2}Ad/2$, identifying the electric field energy density. Similarly an inductor stores $L{I}^2/2$; applying this to a long solenoid yields $B^2/(2{\mu }_0)$ times its interior volume.

Electromagnetic energy is transported by the Poynting vector $\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$. Poynting's theorem,expresses local energy conservation and transfer to matter. In a vacuum plane wave $E=cB$, so the two energy densities are equal and the energy flux has magnitude $c(u_E+u_B)$. For nondispersive linear media the corresponding reversible expressions are $\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{D}/2$ and $\mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{H}/2$; they must not be applied unchanged to arbitrary dispersive or hysteretic materials.

Each photon has energy $hf$, giving the photon emission rate from monochromatic power and wavelengthHere $P$ is radiated signal power, not the phone's total electrical consumption.

In standard configuration the frames are inertial, their corresponding axes are parallel, S${}^{\prime }$ moves at $v$ along the positive $x$ axis of S, and their origins coincide at $t=t^{\prime }=0$. Here $(t,x,y,z)$ and $(t^{\prime },x^{\prime },y^{\prime },z^{\prime })$ label the same event, $c$ is the speed of light and $\gamma =(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$.

A clock fixed in S${}^{\prime }$ has $\Delta x^{\prime }=0$. The inverse time transformation givesso the moving clock accumulates less proper time between its two ticks than the elapsed S-coordinate time.

Without time dilation the flight time from the given altitude would be $66.7\mu \mathrm{s}$, about $30.3$ rest-frame mean lifetimes, giving survival fraction only $e^{-30.3}\simeq 6.8\times 10^{-14}$ even at speed $c$. Relativistic muons can instead reach the ground with appreciable survival. Momentum-selected decay measurements test this clock-rate dependence experimentally.^[ref]

A mean-lifetime survival energy estimate requires a mean flight time no greater than the dilated mean lifetime:This corresponds to survival probability at least about $e^{-1}$. There is no sharp minimum energy for an individual random decay. For a required probability $p$, use $\exp [-H/(\gamma v{\tau }_0)]\ge p$. Energy loss in the atmosphere is neglected in this estimate. In the muon's frame the atmospheric path is length-contracted to $H/\gamma \simeq 660\mathrm{m}$; the ground reaches it in about ${\tau }_0$, giving the same survival probability.

For the two-body decay, use the rest frame of A. Momentum conservation makes B and the photon oppositely directed with equal momentum magnitude $p$. Energy conservation and the energy–momentum relation giveSubstitution and cancellation of $E_B^2$ giveA nonzero emitted photon requires $m_A>m_B$.

For the spring oscillator,so the total mechanical energy is conserved.

For U-tube liquid oscillation, define positive $y$ as the fall of the left surface, equal to the rise of the right surface. The hydrostatic height difference is $2y$. Moving a volume $Ady$ against this height difference gives $dU=2\rho gAydy$, henceEnergy conservation yields $\rho Al\dot{y}(\ddot{y}+2gy/l)=0$. Equivalently the net pressure force is $-2\rho gAy$, so the equation holds also at turning points:With negligible added volume, $y(0)=0$, $\dot{y}(0)=0.015\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. ThusThe graph starts at zero with positive slope and first reaches its maximum after $T/4$.

For viscously damped U-tube oscillation, the total damping force is $-\beta l\dot{y}$, not $-\beta \dot{y}$. ConsequentlyThe underdamped initial-value solution is $y=(v_0/{\omega }_d)e^{-\Gamma t/2}\sin {\omega }_{d}t$, where ${\omega }_d=\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2-{\Gamma }^2/4}=6.255{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. Setting its amplitude envelope equal to $0.1\mathrm{mm}$ givesThis is the decay of the envelope, not the first time the instantaneous displacement passes through $0.1\mathrm{mm}$.

A travelling wave, for example $A\cos (kx-\omega t)$, has moving constant-phase surfaces. A standing wave, for example $2A\sin (kx)\cos (\omega t)$, has stationary nodes and can be formed from two equal counterpropagating waves.

For the half-line finite well with $E>V_0$, define $k=\sqrt{2mE}/\hslash$ and $q=\sqrt{2m(E-V_0)}/\hslash$. The hard wall requires $\psi =0$ for $x<0$ and $\psi (0)=0$, so the general allowed forms areAt the finite step both $\psi$ and ${\psi }^{\prime }$ are continuous:There is no requirement to match the derivative to zero across the infinite wall.

For a bound state $0<E<V_0$, put $\kappa =\sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hslash >0$. Normalizability excludes the growing exponential, leaving $A\sin (kx)$ inside and $D{e}^{-\kappa (x-a)}$ outside. Matching their logarithmic derivatives givesThe exterior expression is equivalent to $C{e}^{-\kappa x}$ by rescaling its constant. Negative cotangent first occurs for $\pi /2<ka<\pi$; all higher allowed intervals also have $ka>\pi /2$. Thus ${\lambda }_1=2\pi /k<4a$. Since $k<\sqrt{2m{V}_0}/\hslash$, a normalizable bound state requiresThis is also sufficient: on the lowest negative-cotangent branch, the two matching sides cross whenever $a\sqrt{2m{V}_0}/\hslash >\pi /2$. The printed non-strict inequality includes the threshold limit. At equality $E=V_0$ and the exterior is not square-integrable, so it is not itself a bound state.

For the helium mass and energy scale given, the limiting width isActual binding requires a width just larger than this threshold in the stated ideal potential.

Faraday's law relates induced electromotive force to the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage. For a coil with $N$ turns and a consistent right-hand orientation,Flux can change through field variation or circuit motion. Lenz's law is the minus sign: the induced current's field opposes the flux change, consistent with energy conservation. It opposes the change rather than necessarily opposing the original field.

For a linear fixed-geometry inductor, $N{\Phi }_B=LI$ and the self-induced electromotive force is $-LdI/dt$. The passive terminal voltage drop is instead $V=LdI/dt$. The stored magnetic energy isInductance is measured in henries. Transformers use mutual inductance: changing one winding's current induces an electromotive force in another.

For a test mass moving around a fixed central mass $M$, gravity is central and conservative. Specific angular momentum $h=|\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{v}|$ and specific orbital energy $ϵ=v^2/2-GM/r$ are constant. The motion is planar and sweeps equal areas in equal times, $dA/dt=h/2$.

For a nonradial orbit, the inverse-square force gives a conic section,Negative energy gives an ellipse, zero energy a parabola and positive energy a hyperbola. For an ellipse of semimajor axis $a$,A circular orbit is the $e=0$ case, with $v=\sqrt{GM/r}$. Escape from radius $r$ requires $v\ge \sqrt{2GM/r}$ in the absence of further forces. For two comparable masses, apply the relative two-body equation with $GM$ replaced by $G(M+m)$, rather than treating one body as fixed.

In the laboratory frame the incoming particle and the composite move along $+x$, while the target is initially at rest. In the equal-energy two-photon decay of a moving particle, zero total transverse momentum makes the two photon directions symmetric about $+x$. Each photon has energy $2m{c}^2$ and momentum magnitude $2mc$, so longitudinal momentum conservation gives $2(2mc)\cos \theta =2.4mc$. ThereforeTheir momenta can be written $(1.2,\pm 1.6)mc$. The opening angle is not $180^{\circ }$ in this frame, because the parent carried nonzero total momentum.

For a particle of rest mass $m_r$, $E=\gamma m_r{c}^2$ and $p=\gamma m_{r}v$, with $\gamma =(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. The low-speed expansion is $E=m_r{c}^2+\frac{1}{2}{m}_r{v}^2+O(m_r{v}^4/c^2)$, separating invariant rest energy from the nonrelativistic kinetic energy term.

Conserve the total laboratory energy and momentum at coalescence: $E_{\mathrm{tot}}=4m{c}^2$ and $p_{\mathrm{tot}}=2.4mc$. Since $V=c^2{p}_{\mathrm{tot}}/E_{\mathrm{tot}}$, the combined particle moves at $0.6c$. Its rest mass is $M=\sqrt{4^2-2.4^2}m=3.2m$. The incident particle is not of mass $m$: its stated energy and momentum imply $m_{\mathrm{incident}}=\sqrt{3^2-2.4^2}m=1.8m$. ThusThe extra $0.4m{c}^2$ is internal rest energy retained by the composite after a perfectly inelastic collision; total energy and four-momentum are conserved, while the sum of individual rest masses need not be.

The composite's Lorentz factor is $1.25$. For a rest-frame lifetime $\tau$, the corresponding laboratory time is $1.25\tau$ and its travel distance isIf $\tau$ denotes a mean radioactive lifetime, this is the mean flight distance, not a fixed distance for every decay. The separate frame diagrams below use the common positive collision axis.

Use $e^{i\omega t}$ phasors. The relation $V=L\dot{I}$ gives $Z_L=i\omega L$. The three branches form a parallel RLC circuit and share the source voltage. The source-current phasor and its real time dependence areConsequently its amplitude is $V_0\sqrt{R^{-2}+(\omega C-1/(\omega L){)}^2}$ and its phase relative to the voltage is ${\tan }^{-1}[R(\omega C-1/(\omega L))]$. At low frequency it is inductive and lags toward $-\pi /2$; at high frequency it is capacitive and leads toward $+\pi /2$. The ideal amplitude diverges at either extreme and has a finite minimum between them; real component losses and source electrical impedance limit those asymptotes.

Zero phase requires cancellation of electrical susceptances:The inductor and capacitor currents are nonzero, equal in magnitude and opposite in phase, while the resistor supplies the in-phase source current. energy oscillates between the reactive elements; dissipation occurs in the shunt resistor. A source-current maximum would describe a different, series-resonant circuit.

The specified ratio isIt exceeds $1/\sqrt{2}$ when $|\omega C-1/(\omega L)|<1/R$. Define $b=1/(RC)$ and ${\omega }_0=1/\sqrt{LC}$. The two positive endpoints are ${\omega }_{\pm }=[\sqrt{b^2+4{\omega }_0^2}\pm b]/2$, soThe endpoints have geometric mean ${\omega }_0$. Increasing the parallel resistance reduces dissipative loading and narrows this band, in contrast with increasing the resistance of a series RLC circuit. Equivalently, $Q={\omega }_0{U}_{\max }/P_{\mathrm{loss}}$, with $U_{\max }=C{V}_0^2/2$ and $P_{\mathrm{loss}}=V_0^2/(2R)$. The parallel RLC bandwidth here belongs to the explicitly defined current ratio, not a half-maximum rule applied to a source-current peak that does not exist.

Here $V(x)$ is potential energy, $E$ is the stationary state's total energy, and $\psi (x)$ is its spatial probability amplitude. The wave function has time factor $e^{-iEt/\hslash }$; $|\psi {|}^2$ is a position probability density for a normalized state. Stationary plane-wave scattering solutions are idealizations described by probability-current ratios, or components of a normalizable wave packet.

Above an upward step, a classical particle is fully transmitted with reduced speed. Quantum mechanically the abrupt wavelength change generally produces both reflected and transmitted amplitudes even though both regions are classically allowed. With unit incident amplitude and no wave arriving from the right,The reflected component has signed wavevector $-k_1$ and the same wavenumber magnitude as the incident component. A finite potential jump with constant mass and no delta interaction requires continuity of $\psi$ and ${\psi }^{\prime }$:The probability current $j=(\hslash /m)\mathrm{Im}({\psi }^{\ast }{\psi }^{\prime })$ gives probability reflection and transmission $\mathcal{R}=|r{|}^2$ and $\mathcal{T}=(k_2/k_1)|t{|}^2$, with $\mathcal{R}+\mathcal{T}=1$. The amplitude $t$ may exceed one without violating conservation of total probability, because the transmitted group speed is smaller.

For $0<E<V_0$, let $\kappa =\sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hslash$. The bounded right-hand solution is $t{e}^{-\kappa x}$, an evanescent wave tail with amplitude penetration scale $1/\kappa$. It carries no outgoing probability current in an infinitely long forbidden half-space, so reflection is total. This differs from transmission through a finite potential barrier, where a second boundary can support quantum tunnelling.

For a downward step, replace $k_2$ by $\sqrt{2m(E+V_0)}/\hslash >k_1$. The same boundary conditions give a nonzero negative $r$, corresponding to a reflected amplitude with phase reversal. If reflection were forbidden, $r=0$ would require both $t=1$ and $k_1=k_2$, impossible for a nonzero step. Reflection therefore does not require a classical potential barrier; the discontinuity of wavenumber mismatch is enough.

For the specified electron energies, $k_2/k_1=\sqrt{40/100}=\sqrt{0.4}$, so the requested amplitude coefficients areThe corresponding probability coefficients are approximately $\mathcal{R}=0.05069$ and $\mathcal{T}=0.94931$. electron mass cancels from these ratios; there is no need to invent an additional material effective mass.