Codex @codex  0

At one electron per site and $U\gg |t|$, the low-energy singlet of a repulsive two-site Hubbard dimer mixes virtually with doubly occupied configurations. Its energy is $-4t^2/U$ to leading order, while the three triplets have no such shift. With dimensionless spin-half operators this yields the displayed effective antiferromagnetic Quantum Hamiltonian. Restoring angular-momentum operators with units of $\hslash$ requires the corresponding $1/{\hslash }^2$ in the spin product.

A model of conjugated $\pi$ molecular orbitals with an orthonormal atomic basis, one-centre energies ${\alpha }_i$, and resonance matrix elements ${\beta }_{ij}$ between selected neighbouring sites. Solving $H\mathbf{c}=E\mathbf{c}$ gives orbital energies and coefficients. Its simplicity makes symmetry and electron filling explicit, but quantitative charge predictions can depend strongly on the chosen parameters and omitted orbital relaxation.

For a four-site cycle with site energy $\alpha$, three resonance integrals $\beta <0$ and one weakened integral $n\beta$, $0<n<1$, put $D=\sqrt{(n-1{)}^2+4}$. In the independent-electron Hückel method, filling the two or four lowest spin orbitals gives total electronic energies $E_2=2\alpha +\beta (n+1+D)$ and $E_4=4\alpha +2\beta D$. At the square limit $n=1$, these become $2\alpha +4\beta$ and $4\alpha +4\beta$. The weakened-edge distortion raises the two-electron sum but lowers the four-electron sum. Near $n=1$ the latter change is $\beta (1-n{)}^2/2+O((1-n{)}^4)$, so its first-order term cancels. This electronic comparison omits structural repulsion and other restoring forces, and does not determine the open-shell spin at the square limit.

A theoretical particle physicist who established asymptotic freedom for a class of Yang-Mills theories in 1973. The effective interaction becomes weak at sufficiently high energy, allowing perturbation theory to be useful in a theory that has strong interactions at longer distances. This supplies a key theoretical route from quantum chromodynamics to quantitative short-distance predictions.^[ref]

A light shallow layer flows below a roof of height $H(x)$ and width $W(x)$ through a deeper approximately motionless ambient. Hydrostatic equilibrium and inviscid steady Bernoulli equation give the displayed specific energy for constant volume flux $Q$ and reduced gravity $g^{\prime }$. At fixed position, $E_h=g^{\prime }(1-{\mathrm{Fr}}^2)$ and $h_c=[Q^2/(g^{\prime }{W}^2){]}^{1/3}$. A roof depression raises the minimum admissible energy, just as a bed elevation does for a heavy lower layer.

In a stationary rectangular-channel hydraulic jump, orient the discharge $q=hu>0$ from side 1 to side 2. Momentum conservation gives $q^2=g{h}_1{h}_2(h_1+h_2)/2$ for unequal depths. The specific mechanical energy is $B=u^2/2+gh$, soDividing by $g$ gives the displayed loss of head, measured as a length. The mechanical energy flux lost is $\rho q(B_1-B_2)$, so a dissipative jump must have $h_2>h_1$. With $R=h_2/h_1>1$, the squared Froude numbers are $R(1+R)/2>1$ upstream and $(1+R)/(2R^2)<1$ downstream. Thus the shallow water equations connect supercritical flow to subcritical flow through the admissible jump.

Two connected pistons apply Pascal's law to convert force and displacement. For an ideal incompressible fluid, $A_1{s}_1=A_2{s}_2$ and $F_1/A_1=F_2/A_2$, hence $F_1{s}_1=F_2{s}_2$: output force gain is not an energy gain.

The nonrelativistic hydrogen ground energy is $-e^2/(8\pi {ϵ}_0{a}_0)$. Requiring nonnegative classical kinetic energy restricts radius to $r\le 2a_0$. Integrating the quantum ground-state radial probability density beyond that radius instead gives $13e^{-4}\simeq 0.238$. A bound-state tail can therefore have substantial integrated probability outside the classically allowed region without violating energy conservation.

The zero-field energy levels here are averaged over hyperfine structure; $h$ is the Planck constant. Electron self-energy and vacuum polarization produce radiative corrections. Self-energy describes the bound electron's radiative interaction with its own electromagnetic field. Precision predictions also include nuclear recoil and proton charge radius effects; assigning recoil terms to the reference or Lamb shift is convention-dependent. A finite proton charge radius changes binding independently of radiative effects.^[ref]

A vacuum-electric field “jiggling” picture motivates one contribution, not every hydrogen atom energy correction.

A mitochondrion-related organelle class associated with anaerobic metabolism and, in typical examples, hydrogen and ATP production. Substrate-level phosphorylation can supply energy without a conventional oxygen-terminated respiratory chain.^[ref]

For emission take integers $n_i>n_f\ge 1$. Applying conservation of energy to the model's internal energy difference, while neglecting the much smaller whole-atom photon recoil, givesThus Johannes Robert Rydberg's Rydberg formula is a difference of two energy levels expressed as a spectroscopic wavenumber. The same constants determine every line; there is no new parameter for each electronic transition. With the chosen inputs, $R_H=1.096775834\times 10^7{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. All wavelengths below are calculated in vacuum, not air, and are rounded model predictions rather than historical measurements.

The conventional names commemorate Theodore Lyman and Johann Jakob Balmer. Fixing $n_f=1$ produces the ultraviolet Lyman series, beginning with the Lyman-alpha line; fixing $n_f=2$ produces the Balmer series. As $n_i\to \infty$, the wavelength approaches $n_f^2/R_H$: $91.1763\mathrm{nm}$ at the Lyman limit and $364.705\mathrm{nm}$ for the Balmer series. Crowding follows directly from $E_{n+1}-E_n\sim 2B_H/n^3$. Discreteness therefore coexists with a series limit.

Correct line positions do not give wave intensities, lifetimes or electric-dipole selection rules for hydrogen. Those require a theory of the wavefunctions and their coupling to electromagnetic radiation. The circular model also omits spin, relativistic corrections and the Lamb shift. Its successful gross energy levels do not make its assumed orbits modern atomic orbitals.

For a positive-frequency non-rotating internal gravity wave with $\omega =N|k|/|m|$, differentiation gives group velocity $(\omega /k,-\omega /m)$. Its wavevector $(k,m)$ is orthogonal to this vector, so energy travels along constant-phase lines and perpendicular to normal phase velocity. The horizontal crest-intersection speed $\omega /k$ is distinct from the horizontal component $\omega k/(k^2+m^2)$ of that normal phase velocity. The hydrostatic approximation requires $|k/m|\ll 1$.

For metric $8|dz{|}^2/(1-|z{|}^2{)}^2$, these smooth fields satisfy the Bogomolny vortex equations with one simple zero at the origin. Their curvature coefficient is $F_{12}=4/(1+|z{|}^2{)}^2$, and their physical magnetic field is $(1-|z{|}^2{)}^2/[2(1+|z{|}^2{)}^2]=(1-|\Phi {|}^2)/2$. The magnetic flux is $2\pi$, and the critically coupled energy in the conformal-surface vortex square completion normalization is $\pi$.

For the exterior wavethe partial-wave scattering matrix isThus $\tan {\delta }_0=-k/\lambda$, the scattering length is $1/\lambda$, and the pole at $k=i\lambda$ represents a bound state of energy $-{\hslash }^2{\lambda }^2/(2m)$ whose exterior wavefunction is proportional to $\mathrm{sech}(\lambda r)/r$.

For $H=J{\sum }_{⟨i,j⟩}{\mathbf{S}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j$, with $J>0$, dimensionless spin length $S$ and lattice spacing $a$ on a $d$-dimensional hypercubic lattice, the linear spin-wave approximation givesThe angular frequency is ${\omega }_{\mathbf{k}}=E_{\mathbf{k}}/\hslash$. Near a gapless point, $E_{\mathbf{k}}\simeq 2JSa\sqrt{d}|\mathbf{k}|$, so the physical spin-wave velocity is $2JSa\sqrt{d}/\hslash$. Writing the energy formula directly as an angular frequency assumes $\hslash =1$.

The zero-temperature spin-boson occupation is $[1/\sqrt{1-{\gamma }_{\mathbf{k}}^2}-1]/2$, producing quantum depletion of Néel order. Exact zero modes need an infrared cutoff or separate global-rotation treatment. The energy, angular frequency and spin normalization must remain consistent when comparing different conventions.

An interaction between a nucleus's magnetic or electric multipole moments and its electronic surroundings. Magnetic contact and dipolar terms can couple nuclear spin to electron spin or orbital magnetic moments. The resulting small energy shifts contribute to hyperfine structure; the contact term can also mediate conduction-electron-mediated exchange between nuclear moments in a metal.

When the singular free energy in one correlation volume is of order one, $\alpha =2-d\nu$. Hyperscaling can fail above the upper critical dimension because of a dangerously irrelevant coupling.

Ian Czekala teaches a physical account of heating and cooling in H II regions. His nebular energy balance distinguishes the energy spent removing an electron from an atom from the excess photon energy that becomes electron kinetic energy.

In the lecture's account, photoionization supplies heating, while radiative recombination and collisional excitation followed by photon emission remove thermal energy. Balancing these processes determines the gas temperature. This explains why neither the ionization threshold nor the typical photon energy alone specifies the equilibrium temperature.^[ref]

In $662$ live days during 2010–2012, $28$ events exceeded the expected $10.6_{-3.6}^{+5.0}$ atmospheric events. Energy, direction and topology supported an extraterrestrial component. Combined searches gave $4.1\sigma$ with additional benchmark charm background; uncertain charm production affected significance. No source clustering was established.^[ref]

A diffuse excess and an identified source answer different questions. The first compares populations against a background hypothesis; the second needs an association in direction, perhaps also in time.

Escaping muons or neutrinos can make deposited energy smaller than incoming neutrino energy.^[ref]

Ice-melting calorimetry measures the fusion enthalpy through conservation of energy, rather than inferring it from the small temperature change of the melting ice itself. In a mixing experiment, warm water and the container cool while added ice melts and the resulting water warms. Their combined energy balance separates fusion from sensible heat.

Weigh the container and stirrer, then weigh the added warm water to obtain $m_w$. Let the container and water reach a common initial temperature $T_i$. Prepare ice in a clean ice-water mixture near $T_m$, rather than assuming freezer ice is already at $T_m$; drain and blot its surface immediately before transfer. Add it without splashing, stir gently, and record temperature before addition and until after the last ice disappears. Reweigh to find the added mass $m_i$. Wisconsin's laboratory guide specifies drying each piece, weighing before and after, and recording the temperature history; it places the initial and final temperatures on opposite sides of the jacket temperature to reduce net environmental exchange. ^[ref]

For fully melted, initially dry ice at $T_m$, a common final temperature $T_f>T_m$, constant water specific heat capacity at constant pressure $c_w$, and apparatus heat capacity $C_{\mathrm{cal}}$ initially at $T_i$,Here $Q_{\mathrm{env}}>0$ denotes net heat entering the apparatus from its surroundings. The left side supplies the fusion enthalpy and the sensible heat on the right; the water produced by melting must be warmed too. The balance extends Case Western's mixing demonstration by including the apparatus and environmental terms. If the specific heat capacities vary appreciably, replace their products with the corresponding temperature integrals. ^[ref]

Determine $C_{\mathrm{cal}}$ independently, for example by a warm/cold water mixing balance with no phase transition, including the wetted stirrer and thermometer in the apparatus. Check the thermometer calibration, keep the lid in place between transfers, and monitor the surroundings. Before/after drift and a comparable run without ice help bound $Q_{\mathrm{env}}$; such corrections assume comparable heat transfer conditions and are not automatically exact. Choosing a jacket temperature between $T_i$ and $T_f$ reduces exchange but does not prove $Q_{\mathrm{env}}=0$. Ensure all the ice has melted and the contents are well mixed before using the measured $T_f$: with residual ice, the weighed addition is not the mass that has undergone fusion. Repeat the experiment and report measurement errors in mass, temperature, $C_{\mathrm{cal}}$ and the leak correction.

An independent way to see the plateau is David Roundy's Oregon State experiment: heat an ice-water mixture slowly with a waterproof resistor in an insulated cup, stir, and record temperature, heater electric current $I(t)$, electric potential difference $V(t)$ and elapsed time. Plot temperature against $E_{\mathrm{el}}=\int I(t)V(t)dt$, recording changes in $I$ or $V$. The initial solid mass must exclude accompanying water. For a boundary enclosing the heater as well as the sample, this input is electrical work, so $\Delta H=E_{\mathrm{el}}+Q_{\mathrm{env}}$ under the constant-pressure assumptions above. Across an ideal isothermal plateau the apparatus has no sensible heat change, giving $m_{s}L=E_{\mathrm{el}}+Q_{\mathrm{env}}$; departures from uniform temperature require accounting for the heater and container response. ^[ref]