Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 69 2 A Solution 2026-10-06
An orthonormal multiresolution analysis consists of closed subspaces of the L2 space with , dense union, intersection , and the dilation rule . A scaling function has integer translates forming an orthonormal basis of . Equivalently,form an orthonormal basis of . Let . Density and the trivial intersection imply .
Nesting gives the scaling refinement equation , with the coefficients in the normalized finer-scale basis. Orthogonality of the translates gives . Its Fourier form is the quadrature mirror filter identity , where .
Set and define in . Its high-pass symbol is . The matrixis unitary almost everywhere. Under the identification of with its finer-scale coefficient space, this two-channel unitary transform splits that space into the translates of and the translates of . The latter are therefore an orthonormal basis of . Dilating gives an orthonormal wavelet basisThis wavelet completion of a multiresolution filter explains how the multiresolution analysis supplies a single orthonormal wavelet. The argument uses coefficient-space completeness, not just pairwise orthogonality.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 7 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Consider the operators on all of or , extending the displayed positive-function formula linearly. Here is the space of continuous functions vanishing at infinity. The multiplier has modulus at most one, so , and multiplication of exponentials gives and . For strong continuity on , choose a compact outside which is small. On the continuous is bounded, making uniform; outside , . For , use pointwise convergence and the dominated convergence theorem with bound . Thus both are contraction semigroups, even when is unbounded.
The generator of a multiplication semigroup isIndeed pointwise difference quotients converge to . A norm limit therefore forces the displayed domain condition, using an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence for the case. Conversely , so the dominated convergence theorem proves the limit when . In write the error as times , with the value at supplied by continuity. That second factor tends uniformly to zero where is bounded and has modulus at most one; the compact-set and small-tail argument applied to proves uniform convergence. To prove directly that is a closed operator, take and . Pointwise limits in , or a common almost-everywhere convergent subsequence in , give . Thus is in the appropriate generator domain and . In the domain is dense because ; in compactly supported continuous functions are a dense subspace contained in the domain.
A real multiplication operator on its maximal domain is an unbounded self-adjoint operator. One direct verification is to test the adjoint relation against functions supported on . If is in the adjoint operator domain with representing vector , those tests force on each such set, hence . The converse follows by integration. On the sigma-finite measure spaces used below, the spectrum of a real multiplication operator is its essential range; spectral values are detected by unit vectors supported where the multiplier is arbitrarily close to that value, while outside the essential range its reciprocal is a bounded resolvent multiplier.
For the heat semigroup on , take the normalization . The unitary Fourier transform converts it to multiplication by , and converts the semigroup to multiplication by . ConsequentlyThe Sobolev space domain is exactly . The continuous spectrum comes from the full essential range of , not from square-integrable Fourier eigenvectors.
For the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup on standard Gaussian measure, the normalized Probabilists' Hermite polynomials form an orthonormal basis. The construction below gives and , so the Hermite coefficient map turns it into a real multiplication operator on . ThereforeFinally, the heat semigroup on the whole real line has no positive spectral gap, whereas the standard Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup has gap one. For the first claim, take a nonzero smooth compactly supported and set . Then , but . This disproves a uniform whole-line Poincare inequality ; one can also choose . Lebesgue measure here is infinite, so it has no normalized probability mean to subtract. For Gaussian measure, the Hermite expansion instead gives the sharp Gaussian Poincaré inequalityEquality holds for affine functions. The identity on the right is interpreted on the energy-form domain, which is larger than the full operator domain.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 7 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Identify with the Boolean hypercube , with coordinatewise multiplication and normalized Haar measure assigning mass to each point. Its Bernoulli function is a Rademacher random variable. The Walsh functions on a hypercube are the Walsh characters , indexed by all subsets , including . Independence of the sign coordinates gives . There are characters, equal to the dimension of , so they form an orthonormal basis.
Flipping coordinate negates exactly when . Thus the coordinate-flip generator on a hypercube satisfiesFor , Parseval identity gives . Equivalently its Dirichlet form of a Markov chain iswhere flips coordinate .
Set and . Since , its Walsh expansion contains only sets of even size. Every nonconstant such set has , giving the even-function spectral gap on a hypercubeAt each the Hahn-Banach theorem supplies a real supporting linear functional of norm at most one with ; for a complex normed space use the real part of a complex norming functional. At take . Convexity of the norm gives . Since , sum these inequalities to get . Therefore . Combining the two bounds yields the sharp Rademacher second-moment inequalityNo smoothness of the norm is required. The constant is sharp: two equal nonzero real coefficients give modulus or with equal probabilities. This is the second-versus-first moment case of the Kahane-Khintchine inequality for arbitrary normed vector spaces.
For the complex-circle assertion, write each independent Steinhaus random variable as , where is uniform on and all quadrant signs are independent. Conditional on the angles, is a Rademacher sum with complex coefficients and . Its conditional second moment is , independent of the angles. The preceding inequality gives its conditional first moment at least . Average over the angles and square to obtain the Steinhaus first-moment lower bound
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 7 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
On the polynomial subspace of , the Gaussian creation and annihilation operators are and . Gaussian integration by parts makes them adjoints there and gives . The Gaussian number operator isThe Probabilists' Hermite polynomials are . Their generating function is , giving . The commutator also yieldsThe orthogonality follows by repeated integration by parts; the leading coefficient is one, so these polynomials span every polynomial. By the allowed density assumption is an orthonormal basis. Define the closed number operator by on . This diagonal multiplication operator is self-adjoint and positive semidefinite; polynomial truncations show it is the closure of the polynomial operator.
The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroup is , or . It also has the Mehler formula for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck semigroupTo verify the formula, apply its right side to : the Gaussian moment-generating function makes the result , proving the eigenvalue identity on every Hermite polynomial. Positivity and invariance of Gaussian measure give contraction by Jensen inequality, so polynomial density extends the equality to all . The coefficient expansion givesFor continuously differentiable with bounded derivative, differentiate the Mehler expectation by the dominated convergence theorem to get the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck gradient commutation identityThe same identity extends to the Gaussian Sobolev form domain. Mehler's formula also gives pointwise convergence to the Gaussian mean for such , since bounded derivative permits at most linear growth.
The Gaussian Dirichlet energy is the energy form of :For polynomials this follows from , and closure extends it to the form domain. For the given continuously differentiable , Gaussian integration by parts yields , so Parseval identity proves the derivative-energy equality directly. Bounded derivative puts in the Gaussian Sobolev space, hence in that form domain; it need not be in the full operator domain, so is not always a legitimate initial definition.
Use the entropy functional . Begin with bounded smooth bounded away from zero, and put . Invariance and Gaussian integration by parts give the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck entropy dissipation identityThe gradient identity and the permitted weighted Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, applied with weight , implyThe entropy tends to zero as by Mehler's formula and bounded convergence. Integrating in time and using invariance yields . Set to obtain the sharp Gaussian logarithmic Sobolev inequalityFor the stated possibly unbounded , apply the argument to smooth positive clipped approximations with a common positive lower bound and uniformly bounded derivatives. They can converge pointwise together with their derivatives and have a common linear-growth bound. Since Gaussian measure integrates every polynomial moment, dominated convergence theorem passes both the entropy and the derivative energy to the limit. This also justifies use of the supplied inequality when itself is unbounded. The normalization concerns , and does not imply ; the second term in the entropy definition must be retained.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 81 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the Hamiltonian , the real-time configuration-space path integral iswith its measure defined by time slicing. Wick rotation gives the Euclidean path integral and the thermal trace.
For the infinite square well on , the Dirichlet boundary conditions select the normalized energy eigenstatesThere is no state: the corresponding sine is identically zero. Taking the trace in this orthonormal basis gives the canonical partition function
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 1 19G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the convention that the inner product is linear in its first argument. Set and . Orthogonality makes the nearest point in the finite span of the first basis vectors. Since an orthonormal basis has dense linear span, for every a finite linear combination approximates within . For all larger , the nearest-point property gives . Thus the series converges in to even without completeness. Taking inner products with each proves uniqueness of its coefficients.
In the Hilbert-space case, Parseval's identity gives . Completeness makesconvergent. It is linear and preserves inner products and norms, so bounded with norm one. Its inverse is the corresponding map sending to ; equivalently every coefficient sequence of a vector in the basis is also square-summable in the basis. Hence is surjective and unitary. Any bounded map agreeing on the agrees on their dense span and then on all of , proving uniqueness.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 1 2C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A counterclockwise planar rotation matrix has the formTo recover this form from preservation of the Euclidean norm, let be the columns of . Applying the norm condition to the two coordinate unit vectors gives . Applying it to their sum givesso . The columns are an orthonormal basis, and : is an orthogonal matrix.
Write . There are two perpendicular unit vectors available for , namely . The first gives determinant , the second . The positive determinant hypothesis selects the first. A norm-preserving planar map with positive determinant is a rotation.
For the commutation condition, writeDirect matrix multiplication givesEquality forces and , so, with and ,If , take and . Otherwise set and choose , . ThenThis describes the centralizer of a planar quarter-turn. Its nonzero elements act as a rotation followed by a uniform scaling, just as multiplication by a nonzero complex number does.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 1 6B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For the reality of the eigenvalues, one may initially allow a nonzero complex eigenvector with . Since is real symmetric, it is a Hermitian matrix, andis real: the numerator equals its own complex conjugate and the denominator is positive. Once is real, a nonzero real or imaginary part of supplies a real eigenvector. We work with the real unit eigenvectors of the problem.
For two such eigenvectors, symmetry givesDistinct eigenvalues therefore give zero dot product. Together with the prescribed unit lengths,These vectors form an orthonormal basis of .
Expand a real unit vector as . Then , and its Rayleigh quotient isMoreover,Every coefficient on the right is strictly positive, so equality forces for . Equality occurs precisely along the top eigendirection:
To obtain a unit vector in using just , let and denote their first coordinates. If , takeThen and . Hence has first coordinate zero and unit length. If , simply take . In either case the Rayleigh quotient of the constructed vector isThe continuous quadratic form attains its maximum on the compact space , so
For , deletion of the first row and column gives , while . The spectral theorem for real symmetric matrices applied to identifies its largest eigenvalue with this maximum:Combining the upper bound for every unit vector with the constructed lower bound provesThis is largest-eigenvalue interlacing for a principal submatrix: restricting a quadratic form to a coordinate hyperplane cannot exceed its old maximum, but leaves some direction in the span of the top two eigenvectors.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 1 7B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A matrix is a diagonalizable matrix if there is an invertible matrix for which is diagonal. Its columns then form a basis of eigenvectors, and the diagonal entries are their corresponding eigenvalues.
Here the given eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis. Put them into the columns of :Define . Its entries areThis proves the claimed diagonalization of a matrix, rather than merely guessing it:The trace follows directly from this factorization:because each column of has unit length. Trace is the sum of the eigenvalues, with multiplicity.
For the particular matrix, . If , every contributes one and contributes zero. If , precisely and contribute zero; the other terms contribute one. ThusApplying this identity to a nonzero eigenvector givesEvery eigenvalue is therefore or .
If is the multiplicity of , the trace formula for a diagonalizable matrix and the zero diagonal giveso . Up to ordering, the required diagonal form isFor this means just . For , the eigendirections are also transparent: the all-ones vector has eigenvalue , and the -dimensional subspace whose coordinate sum is zero has eigenvalue , since . The spectrum consists of one collective mode and zero-sum modes.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 1 14A b iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For the weight , substitution givesThe product-to-sum formula makes this zero when and when . ThereforeIn particular the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, and multiplying each by gives an orthonormal basis for the weighted space.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 3 10F ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
We prove the finite-dimensional spectral theorem for normal operators by induction on dimension. A complex linear operator has an eigenvector with eigenvalue , by the fundamental theorem of algebra. For a normal operator , the operator is also normal, andfor every . Applying this to shows .
Normalize . Its orthogonal complement is invariant under both and : the adjoint operator identities pair with through , and with through . The restricted operator on remains normal, and its adjoint is the restriction of . Induction supplies an orthonormal eigenbasis of , which together with gives one for .
Conversely, in an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors, is diagonal and is the diagonal matrix of the conjugate eigenvalues. The two diagonal operators commute. Thus normality is equivalent to an orthonormal eigenbasis. The zero-dimensional case is immediate.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 103 1 c iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For , take the three vectors from part (iii):Their joint Young–Jucys–Murphy element weights, in the order , areThey are distinct, and part (ii) says that these operators generate . Therefore a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis isIf an orthonormal basis is desired, use , , and . The corresponding standard Young tableaux have shape , with the second-row entry respectively . Their contents agree with the three displayed weights.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 103 5 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a standard Young tableau , let when its entry lies in cell . Its content vector of a standard Young tableau is . We use the following sign convention for axial distance in a Young tableau:This is the axial distance from to . In particular, write for the adjacent transposition .
Here is Young orthogonal form, with one orthonormal basis vector for each standard Young tableau of a fixed shape:If is not standard, omit that term. In this case occupy adjacent cells in one row or column, so or , respectively, and the scalar action is or . On a standard pair , and the matrix isThis is a real orthogonal involution.
To prove the formula, explicitly use the permitted Young seminormal form theorem: the Specht module has a tableau basis whose vectors are joint eigenvectors of the Young–Jucys–Murphy elements, and whose actions, on an admissible pair oriented so that tableau length increases from to , areNonadmissible swaps have the scalar actions just described. The theorem supplies these as one globally consistent representation, not as independently chosen two-dimensional blocks.
Average a positive definite Hermitian inner product over . Distinct tableau lines are orthogonal because their commuting self-adjoint Young–Jucys–Murphy elements have distinct joint weights. Also is self-adjoint, so the two seminormal equations implyUpon setting , the coefficient from to becomes ; the reverse coefficient is the same. All phases are consistent because the seminormal basis was global, and the group relations remain true under this change of basis. This proves Young orthogonal form.
For , there is exactly one standard Young tableau, the row . Its content vector of a standard Young tableau isEvery adjacent distance is , so for every . Thus is the trivial representation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 111 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let be the singular values of the normalized adjacency operator of a bipartite graph, with the uniform inner products used above. Its ordinary matrix in an orthonormal basis on each side is . Expanding the trace of proves the box norm singular-value identityTherefore (ii) immediately implieswhich is (iii).
Conversely, the square of the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of this operator issince a graph indicator function takes values zero and one. Under (iii), every with is at most , soThus (iii)(ii) with . This bound also covers the empty and complete bipartite graphs.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 111 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the following normalization for Fourier analysis on a finite group. Choose one unitary irreducible representation from each equivalence class, including the trivial representation. For a scalar function , putThis convention uses , rather than , in the Fourier transform on a finite group; it makes the normalized convolution on a finite group preserve multiplication order.
The needed representation theory consists of Maschke's theorem and unitarization of a finite-group representation, together with the Schur orthogonality relations:The regular representation contains copies of each , so . Thus the scaled matrix coefficients , and also their complex conjugates, form an orthonormal basis of all scalar functions on . These facts imply Fourier inversion on a finite group and the Parseval identity on a finite group in the formsand henceIn particular, the transform is an isomorphism onto the direct sum of the matrix algebras , with the displayed weighted Hilbert-Schmidt inner product.
Define the normalized convolution on a finite group bySubstituting and using the group representation identity yields the convolution theorem on a finite groupUnlike normalized convolution on a finite group on an abelian group, this product need not commute. If , then . For left translation of a group function and right translation of a group function and ,For an abelian group, every irreducible representation is one-dimensional; this reduces to Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group with characters relabelled by their inverses. These formulas establish the basic scalar theory, with all normalizations and multiplication orders fixed.
Now suppose every nontrivial irreducible representation has . If is a mean-zero function, its component at the trivial representation is zero. The Parseval identity on a finite group gives, for each other ,Using the convolution theorem on a finite group, the Hilbert-Schmidt norm inequality , and the Parseval identity on a finite group once more gives the product mixing in a quasirandom group estimateWrite for the subset density values of , respectively, and let , be balanced subset indicators. Since both are mean-zero functions, . Their squared norms are and . Also , so the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yieldsIf , the final bound is strictly smaller than . Thus the normalized number of pairs with is positive. Equivalently,This is the desired conclusion for a quasirandom group; the strict inequality ensures positivity rather than merely a nonnegative lower bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 111 4 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Within each fixed unitary irreducible representation, choose the selected right singular vectors to be orthonormal. Their corresponding left singular vectors are also orthonormal, even when a singular value is repeated: choose an orthonormal basis in each eigenspace of and put . Therefore, when ,This is (iv), with the unnormalized Hilbert-Schmidt inner product and the Kronecker delta. No orthogonality of differently shaped matrices is being asserted.
For the unheaded continuation, partition into blocks . ThenThe Schur averaging of rectangular matrices formula isfor any matrix . The average is an intertwiner; the Schur lemma makes it zero for inequivalent irreducible representations, and a scalar multiple of the identity for the same representative. The trace determines that scalar in the latter case.
Apply this with . The Hilbert-Schmidt inner product normalization just proved givesExpanding the squared Euclidean norm now yieldsThus the final identity follows from averaging, although itself need not be the identity. The whole construction is the spectral inverse theorem for the matrix-valued U2 quantity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 117 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the nonnegative sign convention for the Laplace-Beltrami operator; the ambient Laplacian has the same sign convention. Changing both signs changes the signs of the eigenvalues below. Let be an orthonormal basis of , and let be the unit-speed geodesic with and . The geodesic Hessian formula givesIndeed, the second derivative along a geodesic is , because its covariant acceleration is zero. Taking the trace of the Hessian matrix in this orthonormal basis gives the displayed Laplace-Beltrami operator.
For the sphere, put , where , and write for a smooth ambient function. The Euclidean metric becomes and its volume form is . The coordinate formula for the Laplace-Beltrami operator therefore gives the polar-coordinate Laplacian identityFor , restriction to yieldsThis relation also has a direct geodesic proof. At a point , complete an orthonormal basis of the tangent space by the radial vector . Each great-circle geodesic satisfies . The chain rule gives . Summing and comparing with the ambient trace gives precisely the radial correction above.
Let be the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree on , and let be its subspace of harmonic polynomials. For , homogeneity gives . Substituting in the polar-coordinate Laplacian identity proves that its restriction is a spherical harmonic withRestriction is injective on : if , homogeneity makes zero away from the origin, hence everywhere.
To count and exhaust these eigenfunctions, use the harmonic decomposition of homogeneous polynomialsHere is an algebraic proof rather than an assumption about the spectrum. On polynomials put the Fischer inner product . Multiplication by is adjoint to , so multiplication by is adjoint to . In finite-dimensional inner-product spaces, the orthogonal complement of the image of multiplication by is . This proves the decomposition. Multiplication by is injective, sowhere the second term is zero for .
Iterating the harmonic decomposition of homogeneous polynomials and restricting to expresses every polynomial restriction as a finite sum of spherical harmonics. Polynomial restrictions contain constants and separate points of the sphere, so the Stone-Weierstrass theorem makes them uniformly dense in the continuous functions, and hence dense in . The Laplace-Beltrami operator is self-adjoint, and eigenfunctions with different eigenvalues are orthogonal. If a smooth eigenfunction had an eigenvalue not in the list, it would be orthogonal to a dense subspace and would vanish. If it had a listed eigenvalue, subtracting its orthogonal projection onto the corresponding finite-dimensional gives the same contradiction. Thus, for , the spectrum of the Laplacian on a sphere isIn particular, the zero eigenvalue has multiplicity one; on each positive eigenvalue has multiplicity two; on the multiplicity is .