A weighted Sturm-Liouville operator has the form
where are real, and in the interval's interior, and the coefficients have the regularity required by the derivatives. The corresponding eigenvalue equation is . Its natural weighted inner product is . Suitable endpoint conditions must also annihilate for a self-adjoint differential operator; the displayed differential expression alone does not specify those conditions.
Multiplication by a positive weight puts the differential equation into Sturm-Liouville form if . Thus , and the constant factor can be chosen so that
This fixes the otherwise arbitrary normalization of the weight consistently with the requested unit norms.
Write the polynomial as . Comparing coefficients gives
Consequently , identifying the solutions as Laguerre polynomials. In particular,
Repeated integration by parts gives the moments . Therefore
For later use, integration by parts in the weighted eigenvalue equations also gives
The endpoint expression vanishes because of the factor at zero and exponential decay at infinity. Hence distinct Laguerre polynomials are orthogonal, an instance of orthogonality of Sturm-Liouville eigenfunctions.
The optimal approximation is the orthogonal projection onto the linear span of . Their orthogonality gives
Completing each square proves both optimality and uniqueness:
For real , these are real coefficients. If complex-valued is allowed while the coefficients remain real, replace the numerator by its real part and use the modulus-squared norm. The question's real formulation corresponds to real .
Here the first three squared norms are one. Using ,
Thus
The coefficient formula from part (b) and the Leibniz rule yield Rodrigues' formula directly:
The leading coefficient is , so . Substitute this differentiated expression into one factor in the squared weighted norm and apply integration by parts times:
Every endpoint term contains a derivative of of order less than : it vanishes at zero, and its exponential decay beats every polynomial at infinity. This proves the normalization of the ordinary Laguerre polynomials for all , including without any integrations by parts.
For a separated axisymmetric harmonic function , multiplying the Laplace equation by gives
The two sides depend on different variables, hence both equal a constant. Put in the angular equation. Since , it becomes the Legendre differential equation
Regularity on both parts of the polar axis restricts , with , and selects the Legendre polynomial . The other angular solution is singular at an endpoint.
The radial Euler differential equation is
Trying gives , so or . Superposition of these separated harmonic functions gives
The Legendre polynomials form the angular expansion for regular data with rotational symmetry about the polar axis; the radial domain and the boundary conditions determine which coefficients survive and where the expansion converges.
With , the boundary data have the finite Legendre polynomial expansion
Inside the sphere, every term is singular at the origin and must be absent. Matching at therefore gives
In the exterior, decay at infinity excludes all terms, including the constant term at . Thus
Both harmonic functions have the prescribed Dirichlet boundary condition, and each is finite throughout its own domain. The interior expression is regular even at the origin because and . Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem identifies these as the respective solutions. Their normal derivatives need not match: the two Dirichlet problems do not require a single harmonic function across the bounding sphere.
Use the sign convention in which a fundamental solution of the Laplace equation satisfies
in the sense of distributions. It is a harmonic function away from the source. Writing , the radial equation is , so . The divergence theorem on a small circle about the source fixes its total flux:
Consequently
The arbitrary constant is a harmonic function. For the alternative convention , the logarithm has the opposite sign; subsequent Green's function formulas must use that convention consistently.
A Dirichlet Green function satisfies in the domain and when lies on its boundary. For a source in the unit disc, put its opposite image at . The method of images gives
The image lies outside the unit disc, so its logarithm is a harmonic function inside. The original logarithm has precisely the unit source strength found in part (a). On ,
so the boundary value is zero. Equivalently, in complex coordinates, the Dirichlet Green function inside the unit disk is
This also covers a source at the origin, where .
Fix the observation point and apply Green's second identity in the source variable . Since , and on the boundary, it gives
The identity can be justified by deleting a small circle about and letting its radius tend to zero; the logarithmic flux contributes .
Set and , and write . The symmetric expression for the Green's function is
At the boundary, the outward normal derivative is at , and hence
Since on the unit circle, the Poisson integral on the unit disk follows, with Poisson kernel
At the origin, the Poisson kernel is one, so the mean value property for harmonic functions gives
For , the denominator in the Poisson kernel satisfies . Thus
The nonnegativity of allows this upper bound to be inserted under the Poisson integral on the unit disk:
This is the upper bound in the Harnack inequality on the unit disk. The same argument with the minimum of the Poisson kernel gives the corresponding lower bound .
In the Laurent series
about a pole of order , the residue is the coefficient
where the circle is traversed anticlockwise. Equivalently, the residue is .
The Taylor series of the entire function gives
The coefficient of , and therefore the residue, is
If , the apparent pole is a removable singularity and the residue is zero.
For the simple-contour form of the residue theorem, let be a positively oriented, simple, closed, piecewise smooth contour. Assume is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of and its interior except at finitely many isolated singularities , all strictly inside , with none on . Then
The more general version weights each residue by the contour's winding number, with the usual requirement that the contour be homologous to zero in the domain of analyticity containing it and the nonsingular region.
For the requested application, assume is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the contour and its closed interior, and is strictly inside it. Its Taylor series shows
Only the second term contributes a residue. The residue theorem therefore proves the derivative form of the Cauchy integral formula:
Close the real segment by an anticlockwise semicircle in the upper half-plane. For , the contour integral over the arc is : its length is , whereas and . The enclosed simple poles are and , with residues
Letting in the residue theorem yields
Use , so and . The unit circle is traversed anticlockwise, and the integral becomes
Only the simple pole lies inside the contour. Its residue is
Hence the residue theorem gives
Write with real , and first translate the real integration variable by . It remains to integrate along the horizontal line .
For , apply the Cauchy integral theorem to the rectangle with vertices . The integrand is an entire function, so
is the negative of the two vertical-edge integrals. On either vertical edge, and
Their combined absolute value is at most and tends to zero. The rectangle below the real axis gives the same estimate with when ; needs no deformation. Absolute convergence follows from . Taking proves the Gaussian contour translation identity
Take and , the positive diffusivity requirement for the forward heat kernel. The PDF does not explicitly specify the sign of ; the stated real Gaussian function formula requires this assumption. For a direct calculation, initially assume sufficiently smooth and rapidly decreasing data, so that the Fourier transform, its inverse and the following integrations are justified. The resulting heat-kernel convolution extends to wider classes of initial data.
Using the stated Fourier transform convention and integration by parts,
The transformed ordinary differential equation has solution . Fourier inversion then gives
Complete the square:
Part (a), after scaling by , evaluates the remaining Gaussian integral even though its shift is imaginary. Therefore
The heat kernel has integral one and is an approximate identity as , which recovers the initial condition. Mere decay at spatial infinity does not by itself imply every Fourier integral is absolutely convergent; the regularity assumption above supplies a rigorous setting for the derivation.
Put . In the heat-kernel convolution, complete the real square as
The Gaussian integral therefore gives
At the same formula gives . Equivalently, : the variance of this normalized Gaussian function grows from to .
The initial profiles have unit integral and concentrate at zero as . Precisely, for every smooth compactly supported test function ,
Thus the limit is the Dirac delta distribution, rather than an ordinary function: pointwise the profiles tend to zero away from the origin and diverge at the origin. At every fixed ,
The limiting evolved profile is the heat kernel for a unit point source.
An order- Cartesian tensor has components whose values in two orthonormal Cartesian frames satisfy
with repeated indices summed as in Einstein notation. It is an isotropic tensor when its components are unchanged by every proper rotation, .
For rank two, a half-turn about any coordinate axis changes the sign of each component having exactly one index along that axis. Invariance therefore makes every off-diagonal component zero. Quarter-turns interchanging two coordinate axes then require . Thus, without assuming symmetry in advance,
Conversely, the Kronecker delta is invariant because , so every tensor of this form is isotropic.
For rank three the general proper-rotation invariant form is
where is the Levi-Civita symbol. The convention matters: the isotropic rank-three tensor and reflections distinction says that invariance of a polar tensor under all would force . A nonzero is invariant under proper rotations, and is a pseudotensor under the full orthogonal group. The shell integrals below are invariant under reflections as well, so their odd moments vanish.
Introduce the second moment tensor . The spherical shell is preserved by every rotation, so this is an isotropic tensor, . Its trace determines the constant:
Contracting with the components of the two unit vectors gives
This is the second-order case of radial tensor moments in three dimensions.
Under inversion , the spherical shell and its volume element are unchanged, while the product of three scalar products changes sign. Its integral is therefore its own negative:
Equivalently, its rank-three moment tensor is completely symmetric and cannot have a nonzero multiple of the antisymmetric Levi-Civita symbol.
Let . It is an isotropic tensor and is invariant under every permutation of its four indices. Thus the three coefficients in the general rank-four isotropic form must coincide:
A double tensor contraction gives
Here the three contracted Kronecker delta products contribute , and . Contracting instead with the four unit vectors yields
This agrees with subtracting two instances of the isotropic fourth moment of a ball.
For an ordinary conservative mechanical system, choose generalized coordinates measured from a static equilibrium point. Assume the kinetic energy is quadratic in velocities and there are no velocity-dependent forces. Expanding about equilibrium, the linear term in the potential energy vanishes. Retaining only terms of total degree two gives the small oscillation Lagrangian
An irrelevant constant has been dropped. Coordinate dependence of contributes only terms of third or higher total degree. The matrices are symmetric, is positive definite for independent coordinates, and is positive semidefinite at a stable equilibrium. The Euler-Lagrange equations are
A normal mode has a fixed mode shape and one time factor: . Its angular frequency solves the generalized eigenvalue problem , with . Thus is the normal angular frequency, and the frequency in cycles per unit time is . A zero mode satisfies ; its time dependence is , describing an unopposed displacement or uniform drift rather than a restoring oscillation.
Label the equal masses and the mass by , in cyclic order. Let their equilibrium angles be , with angular displacements . Because the hoop has unit radius, its three arc lengths are
The springs themselves are constrained to the hoop, so these are arc lengths. If their common natural length is , Hooke's law gives . Since the arc lengths have fixed sum , all terms linear in the cancel. Dropping the constant,
Thus the unspecified common natural length does not affect the motion. The mass and restoring matrices in the generalized eigenvalue problem are
Exchange of the two equal masses separates symmetric and antisymmetric normal modes. Direct multiplication gives the complete set
The first is rigid rotation of all three beads: every arc length stays fixed, giving a zero mode. In the second, the equal masses move oppositely while the heavy bead stays fixed; the net force on that bead cancels. In the third, the equal masses move together and the heavy bead moves oppositely with equal angular amplitude. Both nonzero normal modes have zero total angular momentum. These are the normal modes of three beads connected by springs on a circular hoop with .
Use the mode shapes from part (b), and put . The initial velocity decomposes as
There is no antisymmetric component because the initial state treats the equal masses identically. Initial displacements are zero, so the zero mode contributes a linear drift and the nonzero normal mode contributes a sine:
In terms of actual angular positions,
The conserved angular momentum is initially and the total moment of inertia is , so the common angular velocity must be , agreeing with the drift. The relative displacements remain of order , even when the common angle becomes large. Hence small preserves the cyclic ordering and small spring extensions at arbitrarily late times. In the ideal arc-spring model the displayed energies are exactly quadratic in the relative angles, so this motion remains exact while that ordering persists.
A group is a set equipped with a binary operation satisfying the group axioms: closure; associativity, ; an identity element with ; and an inverse element for every , with .
A subgroup is a subset that is a group under the restricted operation. Equivalently, it is nonempty and contains whenever . A generating set of a group is a set whose elements and inverses can be multiplied in finite words to produce every group element.
The group order is its number of elements, . The order of a group element is the least positive integer with , or infinity if there is none. Lagrange's theorem states that for a finite group and subgroup , divides and . In particular, every finite element order divides the group order.
A cyclic group is generated by one element, so every element is a power of that generator. A group isomorphism is a bijective group homomorphism: a bijection satisfying for all .
By Lagrange's theorem, the possible values of the order of a group element are
These are possibilities across groups of order eight; they need not all occur in one group.
If every element has order at most two, every element equals its own inverse. Thus for any ,
so is an abelian group. Choose , and then . The four elements are distinct and form a subgroup : commutativity and prove closure and inverses. Choose . The elements of and are disjoint, since would imply . These two four-element sets therefore exhaust .
Every element consequently has a unique expression , with . The map from triples to these products is bijective and respects multiplication by addition of exponents modulo two. Hence
a direct product of groups and an elementary abelian group.
The cyclic subgroup has order four and index two. Every index-two subgroup is normal: its complement is both the only nontrivial left coset and the only nontrivial right coset. Thus conjugation by is an automorphism of . It must send its generator to another element of order four, namely or . Since ,
equivalently or , as required. Also , since otherwise could generate at most four elements.
In the commuting case, every word reduces uniquely to with and . The eight expressions are distinct because and are disjoint. Multiplication is addition of the two exponents modulo four and two, respectively. Therefore
This gives the multiplication table independently of any other properties of , proving uniqueness up to group isomorphism.
In the inversion case, the relation gives the same eight unique normal forms, now with multiplication
with exponents reduced modulo four and two. Thus this case also has a uniquely determined group structure. A faithful geometric realization is the dihedral group of a square, with a quarter-turn and a reflection in a line through opposite edge midpoints. For example, on the plane,
These preserve the square with vertices and satisfy , . They generate eight distinct transformations, so
No. The quaternion group
is another non-abelian group of order eight: for example while . Its multiplication comes from the associative quaternion algebra, so it does define a group.
It is not isomorphic to the dihedral group of the square. In , only has order two; the six elements have order four. The square's dihedral group has five elements of order two: four reflections and the half-turn. Group isomorphisms preserve element orders, so these groups are distinct. The hypothesis in part (c) excludes , since its only element of order two is already in each cyclic subgroup of order four.
A group homomorphism satisfies for all . It consequently sends the identity element to the identity and inverses to inverses. Its group homomorphism kernel is
A normal subgroup of is a subgroup invariant under conjugation:
Equivalently, for every , so left and right cosets coincide.
Write . Direct matrix multiplication gives
Since , the product is again in . Associativity is inherited from matrix multiplication, the identity element is , and
lies in . These verify all group axioms. This is the Affine group of the complex line, acting by .
For the diagonal subset, , it contains , and . Thus is a subgroup. Finally,
so is a surjective group homomorphism.
The kernel of a group homomorphism found in part (b) is the translation subgroup
It is a subgroup because , and . It is nontrivial since , and proper since, for example, .
Every kernel is a normal subgroup: if , then . Applying the same argument with gives equality of the conjugate subgroup and the kernel. Here one can also check invariance under conjugation directly:
Multiplication by nonzero permutes all , so . Thus is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup, isomorphic to the additive group .
The symmetric group consists of all bijections of , with composition as its operation; its group order is .
An -dimensional complex group representation of is a group homomorphism , where is an -dimensional complex vector space. After a choice of basis, each is an invertible complex matrix, with .
An irreducible representation has and no invariant vector subspace other than and . Two group representations on and on are isomorphic representations if there exists an invertible linear map such that for every . They are inequivalent if no such map exists; in equal-dimensional matrix form this says no fixed change of basis conjugates every to .
In a symmetric group, two permutations are in the same conjugacy class exactly when they have the same cycle type. For the five possibilities and their sizes are
There are transpositions, three pairings into two unordered pairs, three-cycles, and four-cycles. Together with the identity these counts sum to .
The two one-dimensional representations are the trivial representation, , and the sign representation, . The first respects multiplication immediately. For the second, the sign of a permutation is the determinant of its permutation matrix, and multiplicativity of the determinant proves . They are inequivalent since a transposition has images and , and conjugation by a nonzero scalar cannot change a one-dimensional matrix.
Their group homomorphism kernels are
Both are subgroups, indeed normal subgroups, because they are kernels. In the second case is the alternating group of even permutations, with twelve elements.
The characters are their scalar values, since the trace of a one-dimensional matrix is its only entry. In the class order from part (b),
The character inner product is the group average of , so
Each has squared norm , in agreement with character orthogonality for distinct irreducible representations.
For a finite group over , the number of inequivalent irreducible representations is its number of conjugacy classes, and the sum of squares of irreducible representation dimensions equals the group order. There are therefore five irreducibles for , with squared dimensions summing to .
First establish that part (c) found every one-dimensional representation. In such a representation, conjugate elements have the same scalar image. All transpositions are conjugate and square to the identity, so they all have one common image with . Transpositions generate , hence gives exactly the trivial representation, while gives exactly the sign representation. There are precisely two degree-one irreducibles.
The other three dimensions are integers at least two and satisfy
No one of them can be at least four, since . They are therefore all two or three. Starting from three twos gives sum of squares ; each replacement of a two by a three adds . To reach requires exactly two replacements. Thus the complete list is
The count of conjugacy classes guarantees that these are all the inequivalent complex irreducible representations, not just dimensions of a proposed incomplete list.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.