Source paper: released examination archive, member
a10100w1-2.pdf; original cover dated 2016-09-14.Write . The rules for set difference, set intersection, and complement of a set giveThe second step is De Morgan's laws; the third distributes set intersection over set union. The fourth uses .
Using set difference as intersection with a complement of a set, then De Morgan's laws and distribution, givesFor the third equality, expand the two set unions: the terms and are absorbed by , and . This proves the required identity entirely by set algebra.
By definition the symmetric difference is . Put and . Distribution of set intersection over set union givesFor disjoint sets, set difference removes nothing, so . ConsequentlyHere the second equality combines with ; the last uses .
A function is onto, or a surjective function, when every has a preimage: . It is one-to-one, or an injective function, when implies for all . It is bijective, a bijection, when both properties hold.
An inverse function is a function satisfyingFor a bijection, is the unique with : existence follows from surjectivity and uniqueness from injectivity. This is a two-sided inverse function, rather than just a left or right inverse.
The function composition is defined by . Suppose . Applying gives . Since the composite is an injective function, . Thus is an injective function.
For each , surjectivity of the function composition gives such that . Taking supplies a preimage of under . Thus is a surjective function.
Let be a two-sided inverse function of . If , apply and use to obtain , proving injectivity. For any , the other identity gives , proving surjectivity. Therefore is a bijection. Both inverse identities matter: a one-sided inverse alone would establish only the corresponding one of these two properties.
Replace by , which stays in the domain of the functional equation. Writing and gives the linear systemTwice the second equation minus the first gives , so the only possible function isTo check existence as well as uniqueness, substitute this expression: .
In fact , since . Conversely, for each , the quadratic equation has a positive root . Thus the functional equation forces exactly on ; its values on are arbitrary. The displayed function is one convenient choice on the full required domain.
A binary relation on is an equivalence relation exactly when it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive:The equivalence class of is . The equivalence classes partition : every element belongs to its own class, and two classes are either equal or disjoint.
For positive integer pairs, reflexivity is . If , reversing the equality gives , establishing symmetry. For transitivity, suppose and . Then and , whenceSince , cancellation gives . Thus , and is an equivalence relation.
Membership in the equivalence class of means , or . Since and are coprime, and for a positive integer . Conversely every such pair satisfies the equality. ThereforeThese pairs are precisely the positive numerator-denominator representations of the rational number .
Suppose the formula holds at . Adding the next Fibonacci number with its sign and using the Fibonacci recurrence givesThis is the required successor case. Thus
Fix and use mathematical induction on with two initial cases, as appropriate for the second-order Fibonacci recurrence. At , the right side is . At , it is .
Fix , using the convention for binomial coefficients that when . At , both and equal if and otherwise.
For the successor step, apply the induction hypothesis, then Pascal's rule:Thus mathematical induction proves the hockey-stick identityThe zero convention also covers the case , without a separate starting index.
The stated identity has an even right side because is even. Its left side is an odd integer times the integer binomial coefficient . An odd multiplier preserves integer parity, so that coefficient must be even. Equivalently, reducing the identity in modular arithmetic gives
Write and . Partition an -element set into distinguished pairs, and let interchange the two elements of every pair. It induces an involution on the -element subsets. Every nonfixed subset is paired with its distinct image, so nonfixed subsets contribute an even number to the binomial coefficient .
A fixed subset contains either both or neither of the elements of each distinguished pair. Since it contains elements, it consists of exactly whole pairs. There are such fixed subsets. Counting modulo therefore givesThe same involution explains part (i): a fixed subset cannot have odd size.
A linear order, also called a total order, is a partial order in which every two elements are comparable: or for all .
This is the pointwise order on a function space. Each of the three partial order axioms follows from the corresponding axiom in .
For reflexivity, for every , so . For antisymmetry, if and , then for every ; equality of functions therefore gives . For transitivity, if , then for every , so .
Thus is a partially ordered set. The argument also covers an empty domain , since then there is exactly one function .
Interpret as the strictly positive reals, as in the domain in question 1(e). A bound valid for every is immediately an eventual bound, by taking (or the least natural number under the other convention).
Conversely, suppose the eventual big O notation bound holds with constants . Since , all the finitely many ratios with are finite. Chooseomitting the set of ratios when it is empty. For the definition of gives , and for the original bound does so. Hence the two definitions are equivalent for the stated strictly positive codomain.
Strict positivity matters. If were instead intended to include zero, an eventual bound need not extend to all indices: , , and for give a counterexample. More generally, extension is possible exactly when each initial zero of is also a zero of .
Use natural logarithms; the same argument works for any fixed base greater than . The function is increasing for , since its derivative is . With natural logs the sole negative summand is at . Put .
For all sufficiently large with , monotonicity and the triangle inequality giveThese are fixed constants and an eventual bound, provingFor another fixed logarithm base there are still only finitely many negative initial terms, which are absorbed in .
For natural logarithms and sufficiently large , take the logarithm of the positive expression:Set . Then . The exponential function grows faster than : for example, its power series gives for , so . In particular, eventually . Exponentiating yieldsFor logarithms to a fixed base , the natural logarithm of the left side is , still smaller than eventually. The big O notation conclusion is therefore independent of that base choice.
Unroll the recurrence relation down to its initial condition:ThusIndeed , so the sharper growth classification is in big theta notation.
Multiplying the recurrence relation by removes the average:For , subtract the same identity at :Rearranging gives . This also holds at , because the original recurrence relation gives and . Summing the differences therefore yieldsHere is a harmonic number. Since , we have for , also establishing in big theta notation.
Write , so . The chain rule givesHence and the Cauchy-Euler equation becomesIts characteristic equation is . The distinct roots give . Returning to the original independent variable givesThe same form holds on any negative interval avoiding , using ; the stated substitution covers the positive interval. At the differential equation is singular, so crossing it is a separate extension problem.
Seek a particular solution . Substitution into the linear ordinary differential equation gives , so . Add the complementary solution from part (a):The two prescribed values yield and . Thus , so and . ThereforeDirect substitution gives and , and the homogeneous solution contributes zero to the left-hand differential operator.
On an interval avoiding , divide by to obtain the first-order linear ordinary differential equationAn integrating factor is . Multiplying through and using the product rule givesBy integration by parts, . ConsequentlyThe formula differentiates back to the original equation. Although division excluded , this formula has a smooth extension there with , satisfying the original equation at zero as well.
The substitution gives . Cancelling on both sides of the differential equation, for , givesThe initial condition is . This selects a positive solution locally, so separation of variables givesUsing gives , and continuity selects the positive square root:The real solution containing has maximal positive domain . Its denominator tends to zero and as , a finite-time blow-up of an ordinary differential equation in the independent variable . Thus the source's wording “for ” needs this domain restriction; the prescribed initial value admits no real solution on the whole positive half-line. The division by loses the separate solution , but that solution does not meet the initial condition.
Divide into equal subintervals of width , with . Linear interpolation between adjacent values of gives a trapezoid of signed area . Adding these areas produces the composite trapezoidal ruleFor continuous , this tends to the integral as ; if has a bounded continuous second derivative, the error is at most .
The original PDF prints while using as the bound summation index and as the upper limit. Literally this does not specify a varying upper limit. Interpreting the intended limit as , and relabelling the summation index , gives the right Riemann sumFor , , and , the only difference from the composite trapezoidal rule is the endpoint weighting: . Hence
The given square wave agrees almost everywhere with an odd function on ; its assigned value at the single point does not affect any Fourier coefficient. Thus , whileThe Fourier series is thereforeThe Dirichlet convergence theorem for Fourier series applies because the periodic extension is piecewise smooth. It gives at each continuity point and the midpoint at the jumps, including ; it does not reproduce the assigned value there.
At the continuity point , and . ThusNo evaluation at a discontinuity or rearrangement of the conditionally convergent series is involved.
A Fourier sine series automatically meets the zero-temperature boundary conditions because . Equivalently, extend oddly from to and then periodically with period . Its Fourier series has only sine terms, withThe coefficient formula follows from the orthogonality identityFor piecewise smooth initial data the series equals at interior continuity points and the average of its one-sided values at interior jumps. More general square-integrable data have convergence in L2 norm convergence. A classical solution continuous at the initial corners additionally requires , in agreement with the prescribed boundary conditions.
Substitute the proposed Fourier sine series into the heat equation:Projecting onto each sine using orthogonality gives for every mode with . The initial condition fixes , since already describes the initial amplitude. HenceFor a mode with , the value of is immaterial and the same convention is convenient. The positive thermal diffusivity damps every mode, with higher frequencies decaying faster. For square-integrable initial data the damping justifies termwise differentiation for and recovery of the initial data in L2 norm convergence as .
The left panel illustrates the Fourier series in part (b). The right panel is a self-generated example with and , showing the two normal modes decaying at rates and .
The critical points satisfy both first partial derivatives equal to zero:Substitute into the second equation to get . Thus the candidates are and .
The Hessian matrix and its determinant areAt the determinant is , so the Hessian matrix is indefinite and the point is a saddle point. At the determinant is and , so the Hessian matrix is positive definite and the point is a strict local minimum, with valueThere is no local maximum. Along , is unbounded above and below, so there are no global extrema either.
The constraint is a compact set, so the continuous objective attains both extrema by the extreme value theorem. Use Lagrange multipliers with :Since the second component makes , the two equations give , or . Substitution into the constraint yieldswith matching signs. The objective values are thereforeThe constraint gradient never vanishes on the ellipse, so these are all the possible extrema. As a direct check, set , ; then and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , with equality at the same points.
The tangent line to at is . Its intersection with the horizontal axis gives Newton's method:Each step requires . Convergence to a zero of a function additionally depends on the starting point and the local behavior of ; the update formula alone is not a convergence guarantee.
Since , Newton's method becomesFor , subtraction from givesAlso . Hence . Equivalently, the positive excess above is multiplied by the function from part (c): , with .
Thus the iterates form a decreasing sequence bounded below by . By the monotone convergence theorem for sequences they have a limit . Passing to the limit in the continuous update gives , or . Therefore . The exact error formula also shows quadratic convergence near this root.
For , the same Newton's method formula givesThus the first step overshoots the root to . Part (e) then applies from index : the remaining sequence decreases to . The first step can be very large when is close to , where the derivative vanishes, but every starting value strictly between and still gives convergence to . The entire sequence is not decreasing, since .
For a nonnegative integer-valued random variable, its expectation is the probability-weighted sumAll terms are nonnegative, so this is always defined as an extended nonnegative number, possibly .
Because the partition the sample space, the events are disjoint and their union is . Finite additivity and the definition of conditional probability give the law of total probabilityThe assumption ensures that each conditional probability is defined.
The conditional expectation given an event of positive probability isApply the law of total probability to each event :This is the law of total expectation. Interchanging the sums is justified by nonnegative terms, for example by Tonelli theorem, so it remains valid when the expectation is infinite.
Put , the probability of surviving a full day, and . These lie in . Let be the event that the first breakdown is in the morning. By independence, surviving complete days and then failing in the morning of day has probability .
These events are disjoint, so summing the geometric series givesThere is no missing probability of never breaking down: survival for days has probability .
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 133 total.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
