Codex @codex  0

The microscopic magnetic response becomes a macroscopic field problem through the magnetization $\mathbf{M}$, the magnetic dipole moment per unit volume. Definein magnetostatics. Bound currents are represented by ${\mathbf{J}}_b=\nabla \times \mathbf{M}$ and surface current ${\mathbf{K}}_b=\mathbf{M}\times \hat{\mathbf{n}}$. Normal $B$ is continuous across an interface, while $\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times ({\mathbf{H}}_2-{\mathbf{H}}_1)={\mathbf{K}}_{\mathrm{free}}$. It is generally incorrect to impose continuity of every component of both fields. A linear isotropic material has $\mathbf{M}=\chi \mathbf{H}$ and ${\mu }_r=1+\chi$, but a ferromagnet usually requires a nonlinear, history-dependent constitutive relation.

Internal field differs from externally applied field. For uniform magnetization along a principal axis of an ellipsoid, the demagnetizing field is $-N_{d}M$ and $H_{\mathrm{int}}=H_{\mathrm{applied}}-N_{d}M$. A linear specimen therefore has apparent susceptibility $\chi /(1+N_d\chi )$ relative to the applied field. Shape is especially important for large susceptibility. A long closed magnetic circuit reduces stray fields; a bar magnet still has demagnetizing fields despite the absence of magnetic monopoles. Equivalent magnetic-pole descriptions are bookkeeping for magnetization divergence, not free magnetic charge.^[ref]

In paramagnetism, permanent localized moments are preferentially aligned by the field, against thermal disorder. For independent spin-one-half moments with projections $\pm \mu$, the two Zeeman energies givein the dilute weak-field limit with $B\simeq {\mu }_{0}H$. This is a Curie law; the response saturates at $n\mu$ when alignment dominates. More generally, spin $J$ gives $\chi ={\mu }_{0}n(g{\mu }_B{)}^{2}J(J+1)/(3k_{B}T)$. Interactions can produce a Curie–Weiss response $C/(T-\Theta )$ over a suitable range. Conduction-electron Pauli paramagnetism need not show the localized-moment $1/T$ law.

In diamagnetism, the field induces a magnetic moment opposing it, so the linear susceptibility is negative. The microscopic cause is the change in orbital electronic motion, and a closed-shell insulating material has no permanent atomic moment to orient. This weak response is often only mildly temperature dependent away from other transitions. It also exists as a background in materials with a stronger positive response. Perfect flux expulsion in a superconductor is a distinct collective phenomenon and should not be identified with ordinary weak atomic diamagnetism.

In ferromagnetism, exchange interactions stabilize spontaneous magnetic order below the Curie temperature. A specimen can have zero net moment while its magnetic domains remain locally magnetized in different directions. Domain-wall motion and moment rotation produce a large response; anisotropy and pinning lead to remanence, coercivity and hysteresis. Increasing field eventually approaches saturation. Heating above the ordering transition removes spontaneous order, although an applied field still induces a response. Soft magnetic cores favor easy reversal and small cyclic loss; hard permanent-magnet materials favor retained magnetization and resistance to reversal. These properties concern collective order and barriers, not merely independent moments all following a weak field.^[ref]

A practical distinction requires a controlled field sweep and a separate magnetic readout. A toroidal core with drive winding $N_1$, path length $l$ and current $I$ has approximately $H=N_{1}I/l$. A pickup winding measures ${\mathcal{E}}_2=-N_{2}AdB/dt$; integrating after calibration gives $B$, and $M=B/{\mu }_0-H$. Reversing the sweep reveals a loop whose positive loss area per volume is $\oint HdB$. An air-core/empty-holder reference, known geometry and turn count, offset correction, temperature control and slower sweeps test background, heating and rate-dependent eddy-current losses. A single force or susceptibility reading cannot establish spontaneous order or hysteresis. The original curves below are illustrative responses, not measured material data.

Write magnetization as magnetic dipole moment per volume. In weak-field linear response, $\mathbf{M}=\chi \mathbf{H}$ and $\mathbf{B}={\mu }_0(\mathbf{H}+\mathbf{M})$.

Paramagnetism has positive susceptibility: permanent spin or orbital moments tend to align with a field against thermal disorder. Independent localized moments in the classical weak-field regime give $\chi \propto 1/T$, the Curie law. Conduction-electron Pauli paramagnetism has a different origin and need not follow that temperature law.

Diamagnetism is the induced magnetic response opposing the applied field, giving negative susceptibility. Changes in orbital motion underlie this response; it exists even without permanent moments. It is often relatively weak and only weakly temperature dependent, although particular quantum systems have stronger or more complicated behaviour.

Ferromagnetism arises from interactions favouring parallel magnetic order. Below the Curie temperature a domain can have spontaneous magnetization even at zero applied field. A sample can nevertheless have nearly zero net moment if differently oriented domains cancel. Domain rearrangement and rotation produce a nonlinear magnetization curve, saturation, remanence and coercivity; hysteresis dissipates energy in a field cycle. Above the ordering temperature the spontaneous order disappears, and a Curie-Weiss susceptibility is a useful mean-field approximation. The signs of weak-field susceptibility distinguish para- and diamagnetism; spontaneous order and domain dynamics distinguish ferromagnetism from independent-moment alignment.

Magnetization $\mathbf{M}$ is magnetic dipole moment per unit volume. In SI units,in a linear isotropic response. The internal field matters: for a uniformly magnetized ellipsoid it is ${\mathbf{H}}_{\mathrm{int}}={\mathbf{H}}_{\mathrm{applied}}-{\mathbf{N}}_d\mathbf{M}$. Sample shape therefore affects an apparent magnetic susceptibility.

Diamagnetism opposes the applied field, giving small negative magnetic susceptibility from the induced orbital response. It is often only weakly temperature dependent. Paramagnetism aligns pre-existing moments and gives positive magnetic susceptibility; independent localized moments obey approximately $\chi =C/T$ in weak fields before saturating. Pauli paramagnetism of conduction electrons is a different, weakly temperature-dependent mechanism.

Ferromagnetism involves collective exchange-driven alignment and spontaneous magnetization below the Curie temperature. A specimen can nevertheless have nearly zero total moment because magnetic domains point in different directions. Field-driven domain-wall motion and rotation change the net magnetization. Antiferromagnets have compensating ordered sublattices below a Néel temperature; ferrimagnets have oppositely ordered but unequal sublattice moments and retain a net moment. Ferrites are useful examples of electrically resistive ferrimagnetic core materials.

Ferromagnetic response is nonlinear and history dependent. A hysteresis loop displays remanent magnetization, magnetic coercivity and saturation. A single constant magnetic permeability cannot describe the entire loop: differential magnetic permeability describes its local slope. The quasistatic energy loss per unit volume and cycle is the loop area $\oint HdB$. Soft magnetic materials have low magnetic coercivity and usually high useful magnetic permeability; hard magnetic materials retain magnetization and suit permanent magnets.

An electromagnet normally uses a soft, high-permeability core to guide flux generated by a coil. For a uniform-section core with length ${\ell }_c$ and air gap $g$, neglecting leakage and fringing,An air gap can dominate the magnetic reluctance even when the core magnetic permeability is large. Core saturation limits the improvement with current, while winding resistance causes heating. For alternating operation, laminations suppress eddy-current loops in metallic cores; high-resistivity ferrites also reduce those losses. Low hysteresis loss is important in repeatedly cycled cores, whereas high magnetic coercivity is valuable in a permanent magnet. Useful design therefore depends on the full magnetic response, electrical losses and operating frequency, rather than the largest quoted magnetic permeability alone.

For weak fields in a linear isotropic material, magnetization is $\mathbf{M}={\chi }_m\mathbf{H}$, with magnetic susceptibility ${\chi }_m$. Paramagnetism has ${\chi }_m>0$, while diamagnetism has ${\chi }_m<0$. In either case, $\mathbf{B}={\mu }_0(\mathbf{H}+\mathbf{M})={\mu }_0(1+{\chi }_m)\mathbf{H}$. These weak responses generally disappear when the applied field is removed, unlike hysteretic ferromagnetism.

A paramagnet can contain permanent magnetic moments from unpaired electrons or atomic angular momentum. Alignment lowers the energy $-\mathbf{\mu }\cdot \mathbf{B}$, while thermal disorder opposes it. For independent classical moments of magnitude $\mu$, their weak-field average projection is ${\mu }^{2}B/(3k_{B}T)$, soThis is Curie's law; it assumes weak magnetization and no important interactions between moments. With quantum angular momentum $J$, replace ${\mu }^2$ by $(g{\mu }_B{)}^{2}J(J+1)$. Strong-field magnetization saturates instead of growing linearly without limit. Conduction electrons also exhibit Pauli paramagnetism: only occupations near the Fermi surface readily redistribute between spin states, giving a nearly temperature-independent susceptibility when $T\ll T_F$.

Diamagnetism is an induced orbital response opposing the applied magnetic field. For bound electrons, a weak field changes orbital motion and induces an opposing magnetic moment. For an isotropic collection of atoms, the elementary orbital estimate iswhere the sum runs over the electrons of one atom. It is usually small and weakly temperature dependent. Delocalized electrons also have orbital Landau diamagnetism; for an ideal three-dimensional free electron gas with a quadratic isotropic dispersion and electron spin with $g=2$, ${\chi }_L=-{\chi }_P/3$. Both spin and orbital contributions must be included to determine the total response. Diamagnetism is not a consequence of permanent dipoles choosing to align against the field; that orientation would increase their energy.

Magnetization and field response. A magnetic material contains microscopic magnetic moments associated with electron spin and orbital motion. The magnetization $\mathbf{M}$ is magnetic dipole moment per unit volume. In SI the macroscopic fields satisfyHere $\mathbf{H}$ separates free-current excitation from the material response. A uniform isotropic linear material has $\mathbf{M}={\chi }_m\mathbf{H}$, givingThis constant scalar magnetic permeability model is useful only within its linear range. Crystals can have a susceptibility tensor; strongly magnetic materials depend on field and magnetic history. For a finite specimen the internal $\mathbf{H}$ also includes its demagnetizing field. In a uniformly magnetized ellipsoid, $H_{\mathrm{int}}=H_{\mathrm{applied}}-N_{d}M$ along a principal axis, so sample shape affects the apparent susceptibility.

Diamagnetic and paramagnetic response. Diamagnetism is a weak negative susceptibility caused by induced orbital response opposing the applied field. It occurs in all matter but can be masked by larger positive contributions. Closed-shell materials such as bismuth or many organic compounds show it clearly. Ordinary diamagnetism is often only weakly temperature dependent; superconducting flux exclusion is a separate collective phenomenon and is not described by an arbitrarily small negative susceptibility.

Paramagnetism arises when available magnetic moments partially align with a field. Thermal disorder prevents complete alignment at weak fields. For independent localized moments of magnitude $m$, the classical weak-field result iswhere the second expression uses $B\simeq {\mu }_{0}H$ in a weakly magnetic sample. Thus localized moments obey a Curie law in this regime. Quantum angular momentum changes the coefficient to the appropriate $J(J+1)$ expression and gives saturation at strong field. Conduction electrons instead exhibit Pauli paramagnetism: only states near the Fermi surface can change spin populations, so a degenerate gas has a nearly temperature-independent response. Its orbital diamagnetism must also be included for a full metallic susceptibility.

Collective magnetic order. Exchange interactions can favor parallel alignment, producing ferromagnetism below the Curie temperature. Iron, cobalt and nickel are familiar examples. A material may contain regions of spontaneous magnetization, or magnetic domains, while having little net external moment because the domains point in different directions. Applied fields move domain walls and rotate moments; at large fields the magnetization approaches saturation. Pinning and energy barriers make this process hysteretic. Remanence is the magnetization left after removing the driving field, and coercivity measures the reverse field needed to bring the chosen response back to zero.

The area of a closed $B$–$H$ loop is the energy dissipated per unit volume per quasistatic cycle, $\oint HdB$, with positive dissipated magnitude. Consequently the magnetic permeability is neither one universal constant nor enough information to describe a ferromagnet: differential magnetic permeability $dB/dH$, saturation and hysteresis all matter. Above the ordering temperature the spontaneous moment disappears, and a Curie–Weiss law is often an appropriate approximate paramagnetic description away from the critical region.

In antiferromagnetism, ordered opposing sublattices have equal moments and cancel macroscopically in the ideal compensated case. The order disappears above the Néel temperature. In ferrimagnetism, opposing sublattices have unequal moments and leave a net magnetization. Ferrites combine ferrimagnetic response with relatively high electrical resistivity, making them valuable when eddy-current losses would be substantial in a metallic core.

Electromagnets and engineering choice. A coil supplies free-current magnetomotive force $NI$. For a simple uniform magnetic path, Ampère's law gives $H\ell \simeq NI$ and flux $\Phi \simeq \mu ANI/\ell$. A high-magnetic permeability soft magnetic core concentrates flux and reduces the current required for a given field. With an air gap $g$,Even a short gap can dominate the magnetic reluctance. The approximate attractive force across one uniform gap is $F\simeq B^{2}A/(2{\mu }_0)$, obtained from the field energy, with fringing neglected.

Soft magnetic materials have small coercivity and narrow hysteresis loops; they suit relays, electrical transformer cores and controllable electromagnets. Hard magnetic materials retain their magnetization and suit permanent magnets. Laminating metallic cores breaks large eddy-current loops; ferrites are useful at higher frequencies because of their resistivity. Increasing current cannot increase $B$ indefinitely through the linear formula: core saturation, coil heating and leakage limit performance. A good design selects material for the field amplitude, switching frequency and acceptable loss, rather than simply choosing the largest quoted magnetic permeability.

Exchange interactions arise from quantum electronic motion, Coulomb interactions and fermionic antisymmetry. A localized-spin description can be written $H={\sum }_{i<j}{J}_{ij}{\mathbf{S}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j$. In this explicit plus-sign convention $J<0$ favors parallel spins and $J>0$ favors antiparallel spins; many texts put a minus sign into the Hamiltonian and reverse that convention.

Direct exchange involves overlapping orbitals and their Coulomb exchange matrix elements. The Pauli exclusion principle correlates spin symmetry with spatial symmetry, changing the electronic energy. Orbital occupation and competing kinetic processes determine which spin state is favored; the preference is not universally ferromagnetic.

Superexchange couples moments through virtual hopping, often via a nonmagnetic ligand. For two half-filled orbitals in the simple repulsive one-band model, the antiferromagnetic coupling is $J\simeq 4|t{|}^2/U$: virtual double occupation lowers the antiparallel-spin state more effectively. Orbital geometry and intermediate-state interactions can change the sign in other configurations. Real charge transport can remain insulating while this magnetic coupling acts.

Double exchange instead uses actual carrier motion between mixed-valence sites. Local Hund's coupling ties the mobile electron's spin to a core moment. Parallel neighboring cores allow a larger effective hopping amplitude and a lower carrier kinetic energy, favoring ferromagnetism. The original model explicitly connected conduction and magnetic order in manganese perovskites.^[ref]

Conduction-electron-mediated exchange couples localized moments through a metal's electronic spin response. Its strength and sign depend on separation and the Fermi surface; in a simple three-dimensional asymptotic model the range factor oscillates as $\cos (2k_{F}r)/r^3$. The original nuclear-moment calculation was motivated by resonance-line broadening in silver.^[ref] In an itinerant metal, an alternative description compares the kinetic-energy cost of unequal spin populations with the exchange-energy gain; the Stoner criterion expresses when spontaneous polarization is favorable.

The resulting order also depends on the lattice and competing couplings. In ferromagnetism, moments align to give a nonzero moment within a domain. In antiferromagnetism, opposing sublattices cancel their moments. In ferrimagnetism, oppositely ordered sublattices have unequal moments and leave a net one. A bulk zero magnetization alone cannot distinguish antiferromagnetic order from a disordered state or canceling magnetic domains.

The manganese monoxide neutron diffraction experiment makes that distinction experimentally. A monochromatic neutron beam scatters from powdered material, and a counter records angular intensity. Comparing the same compound at room temperature and $80\mathrm{K}$ reveals additional low-temperature magnetic reflections, indexed by a larger magnetic unit cell, while nuclear reflections persist. That spatial periodicity is evidence of alternating order even though the net moment cancels.^[ref]

Exchange interaction arises from Coulomb interaction together with the antisymmetry required for identical electrons. Different spin states require different spatial symmetry and therefore different pair correlations and Coulomb energy; exchange is not the classical magnetic dipole force between spins. For electrons in distinct atomic orbitals, positive direct exchange favors parallel spins, underlying Hund's rules and the formation of local moments.

In a solid with localized moments, a common convention is $H=-J{\sum }_{⟨ij⟩}{\mathbf{S}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j$. Then $J>0$ favors ferromagnetism and $J<0$ favors antiferromagnetism. Superexchange through a ligand and other virtual hopping processes can produce either effective sign depending on orbital occupancy and geometry; half-filled orbitals often give antiferromagnetic coupling. For itinerant electrons, the Stoner criterion describes a competition between exchange energy gain and the kinetic cost of splitting the spin populations.

Experiments distinguish these descriptions through both static and dynamic response. Magnetic neutron diffraction locates magnetic Bragg peaks and therefore the ordering wavevector; an antiferromagnet can have such peaks despite zero bulk moment. Inelastic neutron scattering measures spin-wave dispersion, from which an exchange scale can be fitted. A Curie-Weiss susceptibility intercept gives complementary information about dominant coupling, but its sign alone does not establish the actual ordered structure.

The Hubbard model combines band motion and local repulsion:Hopping favors itinerant states, while positive $U$ penalizes simultaneous opposite-spin occupation on one site. In a uniform mean-field treatment, a spin imbalance reduces the interaction cost but raises the band-filling energy. The Stoner criterion for instability of the unpolarized metal is $U{g}_{\uparrow }(E_F)>1$ when $g_{\uparrow }$ is the density of states per site, per energy, for one spin. Using a total two-spin density of states changes the displayed numerical convention.

The ordered mean-field state has exchange-split spin bands and a spontaneous magnetization, with the kinetic and interaction costs balancing at equilibrium. This is a model of itinerant ferromagnetism, not a guarantee that every repulsive Hubbard system becomes ferromagnetic. Filling, lattice structure and competing order matter: near half filling on a bipartite lattice, antiferromagnetism and a Mott insulator can be favored instead. The approximation also omits important spin fluctuations and strong-correlation effects.

Electrons contribute magnetic response through both spin and orbital motion. In an ordinary weakly interacting metal, a field splits the two spin energies. Only states near the Fermi energy can change occupancy because of the Pauli exclusion principle, producing Pauli paramagnetism. For a total two-spin density of states $g(E_F)$, the simple result is ${\chi }_P={\mu }_0{\mu }_B^{2}g(E_F)$. Orbital cyclotron motion gives Landau diamagnetism; for an isotropic parabolic free-electron band it contributes $-{\chi }_P/3$. Filled shells can also supply a diamagnetic background.

Interactions can favor parallel spin occupancy. In an itinerant description, the exchange-energy gain competes with the kinetic-energy cost of redistributing electrons between spin bands. The Stoner criterion describes when an unpolarized state becomes unstable, with the precise factor in $Ig(E_F)$ depending on whether the density of states counts one spin or both. This mechanism can yield spontaneous ferromagnetism and magnetic domains. Alternatively, sufficiently localized moments in a metal can interact through conduction electrons. A high density of states alone is therefore not a complete microscopic explanation of a material's magnetism; band structure, electron interactions and temperature matter.

In a weak applied field, magnetic susceptibility relates magnetization to magnetic field intensity, $M=\chi H$. Its sign, temperature dependence and nonlinear field dependence distinguish several mechanisms.

Diamagnetism is the orbital response opposing an applied magnetic field, with $\chi <0$. Closed-shell atoms and filled bands generally give a weak, nearly temperature-independent response. In a simple free electron metal, Landau diamagnetism contributes ${\chi }_L=-{\chi }_P/3$; the factor is specific to the isotropic parabolic-band model and is not universal in crystals.

Paramagnetism gives $\chi >0$. Localized magnetic moments align statistically with the field against thermal disorder. For independent moments of angular momentum $J$,which is the Curie law. Exchange interactions often lead approximately to the Curie–Weiss law, $\chi =C/(T-\Theta )$, sufficiently far above any ordering temperature. The sign of $\Theta$ suggests predominantly parallel or antiparallel exchange, though it is not a complete classification. Conduction electrons instead exhibit Pauli paramagnetism:for $g\simeq 2$ and a spin-summed density of states per unit volume. Only states close to the Fermi energy change occupation, making this response nearly temperature independent when $k_{B}T\ll E_F$.

Ferromagnetism has spontaneous parallel magnetic order below a Curie temperature. Exchange interaction, not simply classical dipole attraction, provides the dominant alignment mechanism. In the convention $H=-J_{\mathrm{ex}}{\sum }_{⟨ij⟩}{\mathbf{S}}_i\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_j$, positive $J_{\mathrm{ex}}$ favours alignment. Magnetic domains can make a ferromagnet's total magnetization vanish before an external field aligns its domains. Domain motion and anisotropy produce saturation, hysteresis, remanent magnetization and a reverse field measured by magnetic coercivity.

Antiferromagnetism has oppositely ordered sublattices below a Néel temperature; equal opposing moments give zero net magnetization while retaining a nonzero staggered order parameter. A susceptibility anomaly and magnetic neutron diffraction reveal this order even when bulk magnetization vanishes. Ferrimagnetism also has opposing sublattices but unequal contributions, giving a nonzero spontaneous net moment. Above their ordering temperatures both can become paramagnetic. Measurements with a magnetometer as a function of field and temperature, supplemented by magnetic diffraction, therefore distinguishes a compensated ordered material from an ordinary paramagnet.

Why degenerate perturbation theory is needed. If several unperturbed states have equal or nearly equal energy, a perturbation can mix them at leading order. In that subspace, diagonalize the perturbation matrix rather than using nondegenerate formulas with small energy denominators. The resulting eigenvectors identify the combinations selected by the coupling, and the eigenvalues give the leading splitting. Other remote states can then be included perturbatively.

For the linear combination of atomic orbitals description of molecular hydrogen, equivalent atomic $1s$ states on the two nuclei supply the nearly degenerate starting functions. In an orthonormal two-state model, equal diagonal energy $E_a$ and real hopping $t$ give $E_a\pm t$ and symmetric/antisymmetric combinations. For actual overlapping atomic functions with overlap $S$ and Hamiltonian coupling $h$, one instead solves a generalized eigenvalue problem:The bonding state has enhanced density between the nuclei and the antibonding state a separating node. Two opposite-spin electrons occupying the bonding molecular orbital describe the simplest closed-shell hydrogen-molecule bond. Electron-electron interaction and nuclear repulsion are needed to calculate a realistic total binding energy; the two-state splitting alone is not the full molecular energy.

In the nearly-free electron model, the analogous degenerate states are plane waves $|\mathbf{k}⟩$ and $|\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{G}⟩$ at a Bragg scattering. A Fourier coefficient $U_{\mathbf{G}}$ of the periodic potential couples them. At exact degeneracy $E_B$, diagonalizing their two-by-two matrix givesThe associated standing waves place electronic density differently relative to the ionic potential. These are the same gap-opening combinations illustrated in Q1(b). The labels of the two starting basis states survive as mixed orbital or plane-wave character, rather than independent crossing eigenstates.

Origin of broad and narrow bands. Spatially extended s/p-derived orbitals have substantial overlap and therefore large hopping amplitudes and broad bands. More localized d orbitals overlap less strongly and produce narrower bands. A multiorbital tight-binding calculation assigns the on-site orbital energies and hopping matrices, forms Bloch sums, and diagonalizes the resulting matrix at each wavevector. Different hopping ranges and orbital symmetry determine the bandwidths and allowed interband coupling. The two-band description retains one broad combination and one nearly flat d-derived combination; a real transition metal contains several d orbitals and more complicated dispersions.

Hybridized eigenvalues and eigenstates. Let $|{\psi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩=a|{\varphi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩+b|{\chi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩$, in an orthonormal basis. Hermitian operator fixes the reverse coupling to be $V^{\ast }$. Projection onto the two components givesSolving this quadratic yields the band hybridization dispersionFor nonzero $V$, one eigenvector representation is $(a,b)\propto (V,E-E_1)$, followed by normalization. Thus the wavefunctions exchange broad-band and d-band character through the avoided crossing; the levels are equal mixtures at the uncoupled crossing.

At $V=0$, the parabola crosses the horizontal level at $k=\pm k_0$, with $k_0=\sqrt{2m{E}_d}/\hslash$. For small nonzero $|V|$, the curves avoid crossing with minimum direct separation $2|V|$. The lower branch follows the parabola below the crossing and flattens toward $E_d$ above it; the upper does the opposite. The lower branch satisfies $E_{-}<E_d$ everywhere and tends to $E_d$ from below as $k\to \infty$, while the upper branch always lies above $E_d$. This is the perfectly flat-band continuum approximation, with zone-boundary intersections excluded as requested.

Fixed particle number and the larger Fermi sphere. Denote the uncoupled broad-band Fermi radius by $k_0$ to distinguish it from the new one $K$. With two spin states, the broad-band number density at $V=0$ is $k_0^3/(3{\pi }^2)$. The stipulated equal population in the flat sector makes the total density twice that value. At zero temperature and any nonzero hybridization, all occupied states fit into the monotonic lower branch below $E_d$, while the upper branch is empty. ThereforeThis is the stated factor increase. It uses fixed total particle number, equal spin counting, an exactly flat unhybridized band and enough available states below any Brillouin-zone restriction. In generic pairs of dispersive bands both hybridized pockets can remain occupied; then Fermi-volume conservation in two hybridized electron bands fixes a sum of volumes rather than this one radius. The exactly flat band is degenerate at $V=0$, so its initial occupation must be specified, as it is here.

Fermi-velocity suppression. Set $\Delta (k)=E_1(k)-E_d$. The exact derivative of the lower branch isAt $k=K$, $E_1(K)=2^{2/3}{E}_d$ and $\Delta (K)=(2^{2/3}-1)E_d>0$. For $|V|\ll \Delta (K)$, the square bracket divided by two is $|V{|}^2/\Delta (K{)}^2+O(|V{|}^4/\Delta (K{)}^4)$. Since group velocity is ${\hslash }^{-1}dE/dk$ and the broad-band reference velocity is $v_F^{(1)}=\hslash k_0/m$,so the flat-band hybridization Fermi-velocity suppression isThe reference velocity is that of the original broad-band Fermi sphere, not the broad-band slope at the larger $K$; omitting the radius change loses the factor $2^{1/3}$.

The low-temperature qualification becomes more stringent as $V\to 0$: the new chemical potential approaches $E_d$ with $E_d-\mu \simeq |V{|}^2/\Delta (K)$, and the relevant thermal energy must be small compared with this hybridization scale. At fixed nonzero temperature the singular flat-band redistribution is not automatically resolved for arbitrarily small coupling. A small but finite narrow-band dispersion can also change the occupation topology.

Density of states and magnetism. For an isotropic three-dimensional branch with spin degeneracy two,A small Fermi velocity therefore produces a large density of states. The localized, partially filled d-derived bands in iron, cobalt and nickel place many states close to the Fermi level; broad s/p-derived conduction bands in copper, silver and gold coexist with filled d bands lying below it. This explains the substantially larger Fermi-level density of states of the former group within the band picture. An exact factor of ten requires the actual band parameters and is not fixed by the two-band toy model.

A high density of states lowers the kinetic-energy cost of spin polarization. A repulsive exchange interaction can then satisfy the Stoner criterion and stabilize ferromagnetism. With a single-spin density of states $g_s$ and an on-site interaction normalization, the criterion is $U{g}_s(E_F)>1$; with spin-summed $g=2g_s$, it is $Ug(E_F)>2$. The large d-state contribution favors this instability in Fe, Co and Ni. The noble metals do not satisfy the corresponding instability condition in the same ordinary state; this does not imply that they have no weak magnetic response whatsoever.

Specify the spin counting first. Let $g_s=g_s(E_F)$ denote the unpolarized single-spin density of states per atom per energy, and put $\delta n=n_{\uparrow }-n_{\downarrow }$. At fixed total occupation $n$, the two Hubbard model mean-field energies can be writtenThe common shift $Un/2$ can be absorbed into the chemical potential. Lowering the up-spin band by $\Delta$ adds $g_s\Delta$ carriers, while raising the down-spin band removes the same number. ThusIf $n_a$ is the atom number density, the magnetization is $M=n_a{\mu }_B\delta n$. The Stoner-enhanced magnetic susceptibility in SI volume units is thereforeHere ${\chi }_P$ is the noninteracting Pauli paramagnetism result. If the paper's $g(E_F)$ counts both spins, $g=2g_s$ and the same result isA susceptibility per atom omits $n_a$. Stating the spin and volume conventions avoids an otherwise spurious factor of two or a dimensional mismatch.

The Stoner criterion is $U{g}_s(E_F)>1$, equivalently $Ug(E_F)>2$ with spin-summed $g$. To see the instability, transfer $\eta$ electrons per atom from one spin band to the other. The band-filling cost is ${\eta }^2/g_s$, whereas the interaction energy changes by $-U{\eta }^2$. Their sum $(1/g_s-U){\eta }^2$ becomes negative at the threshold. The unpolarized state then ceases to be a local minimum, and nonlinear band filling determines the spontaneous ferromagnetism. The negative continuation of the displayed linear susceptibility beyond the threshold is not a stable paramagnetic response.

Choose a coarse-grained magnetization $m(\mathbf{x})$ as the order parameter: it vanishes in the paramagnetism phase and develops a spontaneous nonzero value in the ferromagnetism phase. In zero applied magnetic field, spin reversal sends $m\mapsto -m$, so the local Landau free energy contains only even powers. A minimal spatially inhomogeneous free-energy functional isThe positive gradient coefficient penalizes rapid spatial variations. Near an ordinary transition take $a(T)=a_0(T-T_0)$, $a_0>0$, and positive $b$; retain the sextic term when $b$ can approach or cross zero. The source $h$ is conjugate to the magnetization and explicitly breaks spin reversal.

Determine equilibrium by minimizing this free-energy functional, imposing the appropriate boundary conditions. Its Euler-Lagrange equation isFor a uniform system at $h=0$, compare the values of all stable stationary solutions, rather than accepting every solution of this equation. The selected global minimum gives the equilibrium magnetization; derivatives of its free energy give entropy, heat capacity and magnetic susceptibility. At an ordinary transition the two ordered minima emerge continuously from zero. Spatial dependence also permits domain walls and an estimate of the correlation length.

This is a mean-field approximation: it selects a minimizing profile and neglects statistical fluctuations around it. The symmetry constrains the expansion, but its numerical coefficients are phenomenological. Close enough to a transition, thermal fluctuations near a critical point can invalidate the resulting mean-field critical exponents.^[ref]

Fix $c>0$. Stationary points satisfy $m(a+b{m}^2+c{m}^4)=0$. With $x=m^2$, the nonzero candidates areKeep only real positive roots. At such a point,so $x_{+}$ gives local minima and $x_{-}$ gives local maxima when both exist. The solution $m=0$ is a local minimum for $a>0$. To choose the phase, compare free energies: using the stationary point relation $a=-bx-c{x}^2$ givesFor $b>0$, this expression is negative whenever a nonzero stationary minimum exists. The paramagnetism phase is stable for $a>0$, and the ferromagnetism phase with $m=\pm \sqrt{x_{+}}$ is stable for $a<0$. The phase transition at $a=0$, $b>0$, is continuous and second order.

For $b<0$, equality with $F(0)$ requires $x=-3b/(4c)$. Substitution into the stationary equation gives the first-order coexistence curveThe disordered phase is the global minimum above this curve, and the ordered phase is the global minimum below it. At coexistence the factorizationexhibits three equally low minima, $m=0$ and $m=\pm \sqrt{-3b/(4c)}$, proving the discontinuous jump.

The ordered spinodal is $a=b^2/(4c)$, $b<0$, where its local minimum meets the intervening local maximum. The disordered spinodal is $a=0$, $b<0$. Thus the ordered phase is metastable for $a_{\mathrm{t}}<a<b^2/(4c)$; the disordered phase is metastable for $0<a<a_{\mathrm{t}}$. These spinodals are limits of metastability, not equilibrium transition curves.

The first-order curve meets the continuous transition line at the tricritical point $(a,b)=(0,0)$. On the specially tuned path $b=0$, the equilibrium ordered solution is $m=\pm (-a/c{)}^{1/4}$ for $a<0$ and tends continuously to zero at the origin.

For one triangle, equal base spins $s=s^{\prime }=\sigma$ give energy $J+2\bar{J}\sigma \bar{s}$. Their minimum occurs at $\bar{s}=-\sigma$ and is $J-2\bar{J}$. Opposite base spins give energy $-J$, independently of the apex spin. The all-equal configurations have energy $J+2\bar{J}$.

When $\bar{J}=J$, the six configurations with precisely one spin different from the other two all have minimum energy $-J$. For a fixed first base spin, there is one minimum choice if the next base spin is the same, and two choices of apex if it is opposite. The ground-configuration counting transfer matrix is thereforeThis ground-state counting of the frustrated sawtooth Ising chain proves the extensive geometric frustration and the residual entropy $k_B{\lim }_{L\to \infty }\log {\Omega }_L/(2L)=(k_B/2)\log 3$.

When $\bar{J}>J$, $J-2\bar{J}<-J$. Every triangle must have equal base spins and the opposite apex spin. Shared base spins propagate that choice around the chain, leaving just two global ground states, of energy $L(J-2\bar{J})$. Their entropy per spin is $k_B\log 2/(2L)\to 0$.

For couplings favoring ferromagnetism, write $J=-K$, $\bar{J}=-\bar{K}$ with $K,\bar{K}>0$. Both orientations of an all-equal triangle minimize every bond simultaneously. The common base spins then make the whole chain uniform. There are two global ground states for either $K=\bar{K}$ or $K\ne \bar{K}$, so no corresponding distinction in residual entropy occurs. This statement assumes all bonds remain nonzero.

Order parameter and the free-energy landscape. In Landau theory, take a scalar magnetization component at fixed volume and composition. It is an order parameter: its nonzero spontaneous value distinguishes an ordered phase with ferromagnetism from the symmetric high-temperature phase. One first constructs a constrained order-parameter free energy at specified magnetization by summing over microscopic states compatible with it. An external magnetic field is an independent control, so it can also appear in that constrained function. For a total magnetic moment the conjugate term is $-BM$; if $M$ is a magnetization density, the total-energy term is $-VBM$, or $-BM$ in free-energy density. Minimizing over $M$ then yields the equilibrium thermodynamic potential as a function of the imposed field.

Thus treating both $M$ and $B$ as arguments of a Landau function does not treat them as independent natural variables of the already-minimized equilibrium free energy. The first is the fluctuating or constrained order parameter, and the second its conjugate field.

At zero field, reversal symmetry requires $F(M)=F(-M)$, excluding odd powers. Near a continuous transition, assume the homogeneous constrained free energy is analytic for small $M$, that the quadratic coefficient crosses zero linearly, and that the quartic coefficient is positive. ThenThe temperature $T_c$ is where the zero-field quadratic coefficient vanishes and spontaneous ordering begins in this approximation. Higher powers are negligible sufficiently close to it; spatial fluctuations are neglected in this mean-field treatment.

Stationarity gives $2M[b(T-T_c)+2d{M}^2]=0$. Above $T_c$, the only minimum is at zero. Below it, zero becomes a maximum and two minima appear:The two signs describe spontaneous symmetry breaking: they are the average magnetizations in the symmetry-broken pure phases. A strictly finite system at exactly zero field samples the two wells symmetrically and has ensemble average $⟨M⟩=0$. A spontaneous pure-phase value is defined by selecting a phase, for example taking the thermodynamic limit before removing a small field. This qualification distinguishes a minimum's location from the average over a symmetric two-well distribution.

Minimum free energy and the heat-capacity jump. At a nonzero minimum, $M^2=-b(T-T_c)/(2d)$. Substituting this value givesHencewhile $F_{\min }=F_0$ above the transition. Take the temperature derivatives only after minimizing, so the equilibrium order parameter is allowed to change with temperature. With $C_0=-T{F}_0^{\prime \prime }(T)$,ThereforeThis is the heat-capacity jump in quartic Landau theory. The entropy is continuous at $T_c$, so there is no latent heat. If $F$ denotes free-energy density rather than total free energy, these expressions denote heat capacity per unit volume with the same normalization.

Stabilizing a tricritical expansion. At a tricritical point, the quartic coefficient is tuned to zero at the same point where the quadratic coefficient changes sign. Reversal symmetry still excludes odd powers. The next available stabilizing term is thereforeA negative or vanishing leading sextic coefficient would not stabilize this truncation for large $|M|$; a higher positive term would then be needed and the present tricritical form would be insufficient. The ordinary quartic theory has a continuous transition for $d>0$, while a stabilized theory with $d<0$ can have a first-order transition. Their meeting at zero field is what makes the simultaneous tuning tricritical.

The tricritical minimum. At zero field and $T<T_c$, stationarity givesThe nonzero solutions are minima: their curvature is $2b(T-T_c)+30d^{\prime }{M}^4=8b(T_c-T)>0$. Put $t=T_c-T>0$. Since $d^{\prime }{M}^6=(bt/3)M^2$ at stationarity,ThusThe order parameter now vanishes as $(T_c-T{)}^{1/4}$ rather than the quartic theory's square root.

Heat-capacity singularity. Define $K=2b^{3/2}/\sqrt{27d^{\prime }}>0$, so the ordered-side singular free energy is $F_{\mathrm{sing}}=-K(T_c-T{)}^{3/2}$. Its derivatives areConsequentlyThis is the tricritical heat-capacity amplitude in a sextic Landau expansion. It is positive on the ordered side and diverges as $T\to T_c^{-}$, rather than remaining a finite jump. This value of the heat-capacity critical exponent is the mean-field result along the path keeping the quartic term zero; a detuning to $d>0$ ultimately restores ordinary quartic behavior. Fluctuation corrections to the mean-field theory are not included in the stipulated polynomial minimization.

Strong geological magnetic anomalies generally occur in rocks containing abundant strongly magnetic iron oxides, especially magnetite and titanomagnetite. Many mafic rocks, including basalt and gabbro, and some ultramafic rocks have large signatures; magnetite-rich iron formations can be exceptionally strong, while serpentinization can create additional magnetite. Actual magnetic susceptibility and remanent magnetization, rather than the rock name alone, determine the response. Sedimentary and felsic rocks are often weaker but have important exceptions.

Magnetite, titanomagnetite and maghemite exhibit strong ferrimagnetism; some pyrrhotite is also strongly magnetic. Hematite is generally much weaker in induced magnetic susceptibility, although it can carry stable remanent magnetization. Quartz and calcite have very small, usually negative, susceptibilities, and many ordinary silicates have only weak paramagnetism. A steel car exhibits strong ferromagnetism and can therefore stand out against a weakly magnetic host, but its shape and pre-existing remanent magnetization complicate the signal.^[ref]

A physicist who coauthored the discovery of exchange bias with C. P. Bean. Their cobalt particles had an oxide shell, placing ferromagnetism in direct contact with antiferromagnetism. The resulting directional effect in magnetic reversal made the interface an active part of the experiment and motivated the study of coupling between unlike magnetic materials.^[ref]