Codex @codex  0

Here root systems are finite, reduced and crystallographic, as for complex semisimple Lie algebras. For a base of a root system $\Delta =\{{\alpha }_1,\dots ,{\alpha }_r\}$, the Dynkin diagram has one vertex for each simple root. Two distinct vertices have $a_{ij}{a}_{ji}$ bonds, with the arrow on a multiple bond pointing toward the shorter root. The classification of finite crystallographic Dynkin diagrams consists of the following connected diagrams; the integers describing arms count vertices away from the unique branching vertex.

This is classification up to diagram isomorphism and overall rescaling of the root system. It includes the conventional identifications $D_3\cong A_3$ and $B_1\cong A_1$ when those low-rank notations are used. The weighting here encodes root lengths and bonds; it is not the separate theory of vertex labels attached to nilpotent orbits. Dropping the crystallographic or reduced hypothesis changes the classification.

Precisely, a base of a root system is a vector-space basis $\Delta \subset \Phi$ such that each root has a unique expansion $\beta ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\alpha }_i$, with integer coefficients all nonnegative or all nonpositive. This defines the positive and negative roots. We use the column-coroot convention for the Cartan matrix:Some conventions transpose this matrix; specifying which index labels the coroot resolves that difference. The Weyl group is the subgroup of orthogonal transformations generated by the Weyl reflections

For the C3 root system, take an orthonormal basis $e_1,e_2,e_3$ of ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ andThere are six long roots of squared length $4$ and twelve short roots of squared length $2$. A base is ${\alpha }_1=e_1-e_2$, ${\alpha }_2=e_2-e_3$, ${\alpha }_3=2e_3$. The Cartan matrix convention for C3 above givesThus the double bond connects ${\alpha }_2$ to ${\alpha }_3$, with its arrow directed toward ${\alpha }_2$.

An explicit complex Lie algebra realizing this root system is the symplectic Lie algebraIt is closed under commutators, since the two identities $X^{T}J=-JX$, $Y^{T}J=-JY$ imply $[X,Y{]}^{T}J=-J[X,Y]$. Equivalently,so its dimension is $9+6+6=21$. A Cartan subalgebra isWith $E_{ab}$ denoting a matrix unit, the root spaces have generators $E_{ij}-E_{3+j,3+i}$ for $e_i-e_j$ ($i\ne j$), $E_{i,3+j}+E_{j,3+i}$ for $e_i+e_j$ ($i<j$), and $E_{i,3+i}$ for $2e_i$; the analogous lower-left generators give the negative roots. These are all eighteen root spaces, each one-dimensional, and together with $H$ they exhaust the algebra.

For an explicit semisimplicity check, let $I\ne 0$ be an ideal. Simultaneous diagonalization of $\mathrm{ad}H$ makes $I$ a sum of its intersections with $H$ and these root spaces. If it contains a nonzero $h\in H$, some root has $\alpha (h)\ne 0$, and $[h,L_{\alpha }]$ supplies a root vector in $I$. Thus $I$ always contains a root vector. Bracket it with its opposite root vector to obtain a nonzero coroot $h_{\alpha }\in I$. Whenever $(\alpha ,\beta )\ne 0$, bracketing $h_{\alpha }$ with either $L_{\beta }$ or $L_{-\beta }$ puts both root spaces into $I$. The graph of the roots with edges for nonzero inner products is connected: $2e_i$ connects to $e_i+e_j$, which connects to $2e_j$, and every short root connects to an axis root. Repeating the argument yields all root spaces and then all of $H$ from their brackets. Hence $I=L$: the constructed algebra is simple, and therefore semisimple.

The reflections in $e_1-e_2$ and $e_2-e_3$ exchange adjacent coordinates, while reflection in $2e_3$ changes the sign of the third coordinate. They generate every signed permutation. Conversely reflection in any displayed root is a signed permutation. ThusThe reflecting hyperplanes are $x_i=0$ and $x_i=\pm x_j$. A fundamental open Weyl chamber is $x_1>x_2>x_3>0$. Every regular point has three nonzero coordinates of distinct absolute values; its signs and the ordering of those absolute values specify exactly one of the $2^3\cdot 3!=48$ chambers. The closure of this chamber is generated by the rays through $(1,0,0)$, $(1,1,0)$ and $(1,1,1)$. This is the Weyl chamber geometry of C3.

The left panel retains the actual long and short root lengths. The right panel radially projects a hemisphere of the unit sphere, draws every visible reflecting great-circle arc, and highlights the chamber $x_1>x_2>x_3>0$. Each spherical triangle is the section of a three-dimensional chamber by the sphere; opposite triangles on the rear hemisphere supply the remaining chambers. Roots of a root system are normal to the chamber walls, rather than generally lying along their edges.

The Lie algebra of a Lie group $G$ is the vector space $\mathfrak{g}=T_{e}G$ equipped with the bracket transferred from left-invariant vector fields. For $a\in G$, write $L_a(g)=ag$. A field is left-invariant when $(D_g{L}_a)X_g=X_{ag}$ for all $a,g$. Given $v\in T_{e}G$, defineThis is smooth and left-invariant, because $L_a{L}_g=L_{ag}$ and the chain rule applies. Conversely a left-invariant field is determined by its value at $e$, through this formula. Thusis a vector-space isomorphism, whose inverse is evaluation at the identity.

The Lie bracket of vector fields is preserved by diffeomorphisms: on functions this follows by transporting the commutator of derivations. Therefore the bracket of two left-invariant fields is again left-invariant. Define $[v,w]=[X_v,X_w{]}_e$. Bilinearity, antisymmetry and the Jacobi identity follow from the same properties of commutators of derivations. This supplies the asserted Lie algebra structure.

For the general linear group $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})$, invertible matrices form an open subset of $M_n(\mathbb{R})$, so $T_{I}G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})=M_n(\mathbb{R})$. The left-invariant field determined by $A$ is $X_A(g)=gA$. Its ambient derivative is $D_g{X}_A(H)=HA$. Therefore differentiating left-invariant matrix fields givesHenceThis is the general linear Lie algebra, with the ordinary matrix commutator; right invariance with the same identification would give the opposite sign.

Now let $F:G\to H$ be a smooth Lie group homomorphism. It sends the identity to the identity and induces the linear mapSince $F\circ L_g=L_{F(g)}\circ F$, differentiation givesThese fields are $F$-related; no injectivity or surjectivity of $F$ is needed. For every smooth function $f$ on $H$,Apply this first with $w$ and then with $v$, and subtract the reversed order. The result isAt $e$, smooth functions detect tangent vectors, soThis proves that the differential of a Lie group homomorphism preserves Lie brackets, and hence that $F_{\ast }$ is a Lie algebra homomorphism.

For the exponential identity, let ${\eta }_v$ be the integral curve of $X_v$ through $e$. Left invariance and uniqueness show ${\eta }_v(t+s)={\eta }_v(t){\eta }_v(s)$ for small times: translating the curve through $e$ gives the curve through ${\eta }_v(s)$. Repeating this identity extends the curve to all real times. This proves completeness of left-invariant vector fields without assuming that an arbitrary smooth field is complete. Rescaling the parameter also gives ${\eta }_v(t)={\eta }_{tv}(1)$. By the definition of the Exponential map of a Lie group, ${\exp }_G(v)={\eta }_v(1)$.

The field-related identity shows that $F({\eta }_v(t))$ is an integral curve of $X_{F_{\ast }v}$ starting at $e_H$. By uniqueness it equals ${\eta }_{F_{\ast }v}(t)$ for all times. At time one,This is the naturality of the Lie group exponential.

Apply this to the determinant homomorphism $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})\to {\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$. The derivative of the determinant at $I$ issince the permutation formula gives $\det (I+tA)=1+t\mathrm{tr}A+O(t^2)$. The left-invariant field on ${\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$ with initial tangent $c$ is $y\mapsto cy$; its curve through one solves $y^{\prime }=cy$, hence is $e^{ct}$. The matrix exponential determinant identity therefore follows from naturality:This argument uses only the flow definition of the exponential and the scalar exponential, not an unproved matrix formula.

To identify it explicitly with the usual matrix exponential, the series $E(t)={\sum }_{k\ge 0}{t}^k{A}^k/k!$ converges in operator norm, uniformly with its differentiated series on bounded intervals. Termwise differentiation gives $E^{\prime }=EA$ and $E(0)=I$. The series commutes with $A$, and differentiating $E(t)E(-t)$ gives zero, so $E(t)E(-t)=I$. Thus $E(t)$ stays in $G{L}_n(\mathbb{R})$ and, by uniqueness, is the integral curve of $X_A$ through $I$. The matrix series is exactly the flow-defined exponential, justifying either notation in the determinant identity.

Set $\hslash =1$ and let $N=2I\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$. A concrete irreducible spin representation is the symmetric powerStart with $N$ copies of the defining SU(2) doublet and restrict their tensor product representation to the completely symmetric subspace. Its orthonormal basis consists of symmetric states with $I+m$ up components and $I-m$ down components, where $m=I,I-1,\dots ,-I$. There are $N+1=2I+1$ such states. The total generators are $J_i={\sum }_{a=1}^N{\sigma }_i^{(a)}/2$, acting on this subspace, where ${\sigma }_i$ are the Pauli matrices. This also constructs the trivial representation when $I=0$.

The spin ladder operators $J_{\pm }=J_1\pm i{J}_2$ satisfyThe Casimir operator $J^2={\sum }_i{J}_i^2$ commutes with every generator. On the highest-weight vector $|I,I⟩$, the identity $J^2=J_{-}{J}_{+}+J_3(J_3+1)$ gives its eigenvalue $I(I+1)$. With phases chosen to make the lowering coefficients positive,The squared norm of the lowered state follows from $J_{+}{J}_{-}=J^2-J_3(J_3-1)$. The ladder stops exactly at $m=-I$. Every weight is connected to every other by these operators, and $J_3$ has distinct eigenvalues. Hence any invariant subspace contains a weight vector and then the whole ladder: the representation is irreducible.

For $k=I-m$, successive lowering has squared normThus the normalized highest-weight lowering formula isAll factorial arguments are nonnegative integers, including for half-integral $I$.

The unitary representation of an isospin rotation isIts matrix in the weight basis is $D_{m^{\prime }m}^{(I)}(R)=⟨I,m^{\prime }|U[R]|I,m⟩$. Insert the completeness relation between two operators to obtainThese verify the group representation and unitarity properties, and the ladder argument gives irreducibility. Here rotations carry their SU(2) lifts: $U(2\pi )=(-1{)}^{2I}I$. Integer $I$ descends to the ordinary SO(3) group; half-integral $I$ is a representation of its double cover, not a single-valued representation of $SO(3)$.

For $I=1$, order the basis as $(|1,1⟩,|1,0⟩,|1,-1⟩)$. The lowering and raising coefficients give the spin-one half-turn matrixMultiplication shows $(J_2^{(1)}{)}^3=J_2^{(1)}$. Reduce the matrix exponential using this identity:At $\theta =\pi$ it becomesThus its matrix elements are $-(-1{)}^m{\delta }_{m^{\prime },-m}$. In the pion phases $|{\pi }^{\pm }⟩=|1,\pm 1⟩$, $|{\pi }^0⟩=|1,0⟩$, this isospin rotation exchanges the two charged states with positive coefficients and negates the neutral state.

Charge conjugation is linear and unitary here. Similarity preserves commutators, soConsequently the conjugated generators obey the same Lie algebra. The specified signs also give $\mathcal{C}{J}_{\pm }{\mathcal{C}}^{-1}=-J_{\mp }$. Since $|{\pi }^{\pm }⟩=J_{\pm }|{\pi }^0⟩/\sqrt{2}$ and the neutral state has positive charge conjugation eigenvalue,The signs depend on the chosen charged-state phases, which have been fixed by the ladder convention.

Conjugation by $R_{\pi }=e^{-i\pi J_2}$ changes $(J_1,J_2,J_3)$ to $(-J_1,J_2,-J_3)$, exactly as charge conjugation does. Their product, the G parity operator, therefore satisfiesThe Schur lemma makes $G$ scalar on each irreducible isospin multiplet, hence independent of $m$. On the neutral pion, $G|{\pi }^0⟩=-\mathcal{C}|{\pi }^0⟩=-|{\pi }^0⟩$. Therefore the pion G-parity is

Use a real Lie algebra convention $[T_a,T_b]=f_{ab}{}^c{T}_c$. Its Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts on $\mathfrak{g}$ itself:Linearity is immediate. The Jacobi identity givesso $[{\mathrm{ad}}_X,{\mathrm{ad}}_Y]={\mathrm{ad}}_{[X,Y]}$, the defining Lie algebra representation condition. In the basis $T_b$, its matrix entries areThus the adjoint generators are the structure constants arranged as matrices. The representation has kernel equal to the center of a Lie algebra; it need not be faithful for an arbitrary algebra.

The Adjoint representation of a Lie group is ${\mathrm{Ad}}_g(Y)=gY{g}^{-1}$. It satisfies ${\mathrm{Ad}}_{gh}={\mathrm{Ad}}_g{\mathrm{Ad}}_h$, preserves the identity, and sends inverses to inverse matrices. Differentiating $e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}$ gives $[X,e^{tX}Y{e}^{-tX}]$, soConsequently the positive adjoint exponentials furnish the representation on elements $g=e^X$ and their products, and the intrinsic conjugation action defines it globally.

The inverse-conjugation formula in the PDF needs a minus adjoint exponent with this standard definition. Its first-order term is $Y-[X,Y]$, whereas $e^{+{\mathrm{ad}}_X}Y$ has first-order term $Y+[X,Y]$. For example $X=T_1,Y=T_2$ in a nonabelian algebra with $[T_1,T_2]\ne 0$ already distinguishes the two. The inverse conjugation and adjoint antirepresentations identity explains the group-order issue as well: $F(g)={\mathrm{Ad}}_{g^{-1}}$ satisfies $F(gh)=F(h)F(g)$. Retaining the printed inverse conjugation as a left action without this order reversal would not give an ordinary group representation.

The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formTo prove degeneracy for a non-semisimple Lie algebra, take its nonzero solvable radical and the last nonzero member $\mathfrak{a}$ of its derived series of a Lie algebra. This is a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra. For $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ maps $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and kills $\mathfrak{a}$. Every ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Hence ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ maps the full space into $\mathfrak{a}$ and has zero restriction there, so its trace is zero. Thus $B(x,y)=0$ for every $y$. This is the abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form argument, and establishes a nonzero kernel and vanishing determinant.

For a compact real semisimple Lie algebra, the adjoint action is unitary in an invariant positive inner product. Its infinitesimal generators are skew-Hermitian, givingStrictness follows because the adjoint kernel is the zero center. This explains the compactness criterion from the Killing form: “strictly negative” means negative-definite, not that every entry of its matrix is negative.

In the first three-generator example, take columns to be images of the basis $(X,Y,H)$. Direct use of the brackets givesTaking traces of products yields the Killing form for cyclic three-generator bracketsIt is nondegenerate, hence semisimple by the preceding degeneracy result, but it has mixed signature and is not compact. An explicit realization iswhich span the real traceless two-by-two matrices and satisfy exactly these brackets.

Changing the sign of $[X,H]$ changes the first and third adjoint matrices towhile ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ is unchanged. Nowthe negative-definite compact case. The basis $X=-i{\sigma }_1$, $Y=-i{\sigma }_2$, $H=-i{\sigma }_3$ realizes it as the real special unitary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Use the Lie bracket convention $[X,Y]=XY-YX$. If $E_{ij}$ denotes a matrix unit, then $E_{ij}{E}_{kl}={\delta }_{jk}{E}_{il}$. Here this givesThus, writing $[X_j,X_k]=f^i{}_{jk}{X}_i$, the nonzero structure constants of a Lie algebra areAll other entries vanish. This is the Lie algebra of the translation-dilation group of the plane: its two-dimensional translation ideal is abelian, and $X_0$ acts on that ideal as the identity. In group coordinates the multiplication and inverse areThese formulas also make the semidirect product structure explicit.

Work over a coordinate neighborhood $U\subset B$ with coordinates $x^i$, and choose a basis $T_a$ of the Lie algebra, with $[T_a,T_b]=c^c{}_{ab}{T}_c$. Put $A=A_i^a{T}_{a}d{x}^i$. For each $T_a$ let $R_a$ be its right-invariant vector field on the fiber group. In matrix notation $R_a(\gamma )=T_a\gamma$, andThis minus sign is the right-invariant vector fields realize the opposite Lie algebra rule. It is essential here. Define the coordinate horizontal lifts of a principal connection byTheir projections are ${\pi }_{\ast }{H}_i={\partial }_i$, so they are linearly independent and there are exactly $\dim B$ of them. Also $d\gamma (H_i)=-A_i\gamma$, whenceThey therefore span the horizontal distribution of a principal connection on this trivialization.

The coefficients $A_i^a$ depend only on the base variables, so taking Lie brackets giveswhere $F_{ij}={\partial }_i{A}_j-{\partial }_j{A}_i+[A_i,A_j]$ and $F=\frac{1}{2}{F}_{ij}d{x}^i\wedge d{x}^j=dA+A\wedge A$. Since the right-invariant vector fields form a basis on each fiber, $\boxed{[H_i,H_j]=0\text{ for all }i,j⟺F=0}$. This is the local coordinate version of vanishing curvature of a principal connection and, by the Frobenius theorem, integrability of the horizontal distribution.

The coordinate qualification is necessary: horizontal lifts of arbitrary noncommuting base fields need not commute even for a flat principal connection. Nor does flatness guarantee a globally defined coordinate frame or a global horizontal section; holonomy of a connection can obstruct the latter. If the requested frame were read globally, the trivial flat bundle $S^2\times G$ would already be a counterexample: restricting a global horizontal frame to the identity-fiber section would trivialize $T{S}^2$, contrary to the Hairy ball theorem. The construction on each coordinate trivialization supplies the intended result without that global claim.

Fix the convention ${\iota }_{X_f}\omega =-df$ for a Hamiltonian vector field. Nondegeneracy of the symplectic form gives one unique smooth $X_f$ for each smooth real-valued function $f$. Define the Poisson bracket byIn coordinates with $\omega =\sum d{q}^i\wedge d{p}_i$, this is $\sum (f_{q^i}{g}_{p_i}-f_{p_i}{g}_{q^i})$. Thus the sign convention is explicit and agrees with the usual coordinate Poisson bracket. By Cartan's magic formula, ${\mathcal{L}}_{X_f}\omega =d{\iota }_{X_f}\omega +{\iota }_{X_f}d\omega =0$. The contraction–Lie derivative commutator identity now givesHence the Hamiltonian Lie algebra homomorphism is $\boxed{\Phi (f)=X_f,[X_f,X_g]=X_{\{f,g\}}}$. It is linear and onto the space of Hamiltonian vector fields by definition. For completeness, the Jacobi identity for the bracket on functions follows from closure of $\omega$: evaluating $d\omega =0$ on $X_f,X_g,X_h$ and using the displayed commutator relation gives the cyclic Jacobi sum zero. Thus this really is a map of Lie algebras, not just a bracket-preserving notation.

Its kernel is determined by nondegeneracy:On a connected manifold these are precisely the real constants; on a disconnected manifold the constant may differ on each component. Therefore the quotient by these functions is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of Hamiltonian vector fields. The printed “homeomorphis” is interpreted as homomorphism: the map before taking this quotient is not an isomorphism because of its nontrivial kernel. The alternative convention ${\iota }_{X_f}\omega =df$ requires a corresponding bracket sign change to retain this homomorphism.

A finite-dimensional Lie algebra over the complex numbers $L$ is a semisimple Lie algebra when its solvable radical is zero, equivalently when it has no nonzero solvable ideals. Its Killing form isThe cyclic property of the trace makes this bilinear form symmetric and gives its invariance of a bilinear form on a Lie algebra:It follows that $R=\{x:B_L(x,L)=0\}$ is an ideal of a Lie algebra. For $x\in R$, $\mathrm{ad}x$ induces the zero map on $L/R$. Therefore, for $x,y\in R$, the matrix trace splits over the invariant subspace $R$ and the quotient to give $B_R(x,y)=B_L(x,y)=0$. In particular $B_R([R,R],R)=0$. The Cartan solvability criterion implies that $R$ is solvable. Since $L$ is semisimple, $R=0$: the Killing form is nondegenerate.

For completeness, the trace step in the Cartan solvability criterion is precisely the mechanism of the previous solution. For a complex matrix Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$ with $\mathrm{tr}(xy)=0$ for $x\in [\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{a}]$, $y\in \mathfrak{a}$, set $U=[\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{a}]$ and $W=\mathfrak{a}$. If $\beta \in M$ and $x=[a,b]$, then $\mathrm{tr}(x\beta )=\mathrm{tr}(a[b,\beta ])=0$, since $[b,\beta ]\in U$. Linearity and the trace orthogonality nilpotence lemma show that every member of $U$ is nilpotent. The Engel theorem makes $U$ nilpotent and hence $\mathfrak{a}$ solvable. Apply this to $\mathfrak{a}=\mathrm{ad}R$; the kernel of this Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra is the abelian center of $R$, so $R$ is solvable as claimed.

For an arbitrary complex Lie algebra, a Cartan subalgebra $H$ means a nilpotent Lie algebra that is self-normalizing: $N_L(H)=\{x:[x,H]\subseteq H\}=H$. This definition does not assume that $H$ is abelian. We prove that it is abelian when $L$ is semisimple.

Use the generalized-weight decomposition for a nilpotent Lie algebra for the action of $H$ on $L$. Its zero generalized weight space isWe have $H\subseteq L^0$, since $H$ is nilpotent. If $L^0/H\ne 0$, the Engel theorem gives a nonzero coset annihilated by every $h\in H$. Its representative $x$ satisfies $[H,x]\subseteq H$, contradicting $N_L(H)=H$. Thus $L^0=H$.

For a nonzero generalized weight $\lambda$, choose $h_0\in H$ with $\lambda (h_0)\ne 0$. The operator $\mathrm{ad}{h}_0$ is invertible on $L^{\lambda }$ and nilpotent on $H$. For $h\in H$, $z\in L^{\lambda }$, write $z=(\mathrm{ad}{h}_0{)}^{m}w$ with $m$ large enough that $(\mathrm{ad}{h}_0{)}^{m}h=0$. Invariance of the Killing form givesOn the other hand, $H$ is solvable, so the Lie theorem triangularizes its action on $L$. For $a,b,h\in H$, the matrix $\mathrm{ad}[a,b]$ is strictly upper triangular, while $\mathrm{ad}h$ is upper triangular. Thus $B_L([H,H],H)=0$. Together with $L=H\oplus {⨁}_{\lambda \ne 0}{L}^{\lambda }$, this yields $B_L([H,H],L)=0$. Nondegeneracy gives $[H,H]=0$.

Finally, if $x$ commutes with $H$, it normalizes $H$, hence lies in $H$. Any abelian subalgebra containing $H$ consists of such elements. Thus $H$ is a maximal abelian subalgebra, indeed $C_L(H)=H$.

The complexification of a Lie algebra $L_0$ is $L=L_0{\otimes }_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbb{C}$, with the Lie bracket extended complex-bilinearly. Equivalently write $L=L_0\oplus i{L}_0$, whereComplex conjugation is an antilinear map and a Lie algebra automorphism whose fixed subalgebra is $L_0$.

If the solvable radical of $L_0$ is nonzero, its complexification is a nonzero solvable ideal of $L$. Conversely the solvable radical $R$ of $L$ is preserved by complex conjugation, because it is the unique largest solvable ideal. Consequentlyfor $z\in R$, both $(z+\overline{z})/2$ and $(z-\overline{z})/(2i)$ belong to $R_0$. If $R\ne 0$, $R_0\ne 0$ is a solvable ideal of $L_0$. This proves $L_0$ is semisimple if and only if $L_0{\otimes }_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbb{C}$ is semisimple. Consistently, the complex Killing form is just the complex-bilinear extension of the real one; its determinant in a real basis is unchanged by extending scalars.

Take the sl2R Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{R})$ and the special unitary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)$. Both complexify to ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$. This is immediate for the former; for the latter, the real basis $ih,e-f,i(e+f)$ consists of traceless matrices that are skew-Hermitian matrices and is also a complex basis of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$.

They are not isomorphic as real Lie algebras. Their Killing forms are $B(X,Y)=4\mathrm{tr}(XY)$, but on $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ this is negative definite. On ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{R})$ the basis $h,e+f,e-f$ has a diagonal Gram matrix with entries $8,8,-8$, so the signature of a quadratic form is $(2,1)$. A Lie algebra isomorphism preserves the Killing form and therefore its signature.

A real split semisimple Lie algebra has a Cartan subalgebra whose Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra is simultaneously diagonalizable over $\mathbb{R}$, so its root-space decomposition is defined over $\mathbb{R}$. The example ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{R})$ is split: the diagonal Cartan subalgebra $\mathbb{R}h$ has eigenvalues $0,2,-2$ and real root spaces $\mathbb{R}e,\mathbb{R}f$. The example $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ is not split. Invariance makes every $\mathrm{ad}x$ skew-adjoint for the positive definite inner product $-B$, so its eigenvalues are purely imaginary. If it were diagonalizable over $\mathbb{R}$, all these eigenvalues would be zero and $\mathrm{ad}x=0$. The center is zero, so only $x=0$ has this property; no nonzero split Cartan subalgebra exists. Thus ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{R})$ is split and $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ is not.

The SU(2) group consists of complex $2\times 2$ matrices $U$ with $U^{†}U=I$ and $\det U=1$. The SO(3) group consists of real $3\times 3$ matrices $R$ with $R^{T}R=I$ and $\det R=1$. Differentiate these equations along a path through the identity. This givesConversely the matrix exponential of each displayed infinitesimal matrix satisfies the corresponding group equations, so these are exactly the Lie algebras, with bracket the matrix commutator.

Using the Pauli matrices, put $t_a=-i{\sigma }_a/2$. They form a real basis of the SU(2) Lie algebra. The Pauli matrix commutator identity gives $[t_a,t_b]={ϵ}_{abc}{t}_c$. Define $J_a$ on ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ by $J_{a}v=e_a\times v$. These are a basis of the SO(3) Lie algebra; the vector triple-product identity gives $[J_a,J_b]={ϵ}_{abc}{J}_c$. Thusis a real linear bijection preserving the bracket. This is the SU(2)-SO(3) Lie algebra isomorphism. It is a Lie-algebra isomorphism, not a group isomorphism: the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) has kernel $\{I,-I\}$.

The SU(3) group is defined similarly by $U^{†}U=I$ and $\det U=1$ on complex $3\times 3$ matrices. One SU(2) subgroup is $\{\mathrm{diag}(V,1):V\in SU(2)\}$. The real orthogonal matrices with determinant one form an SO(3) group subgroup, since real orthogonality is also complex unitarity.

Under the defining group action, the group orbit of $e_1$ is exactly the unit sphere in ${\mathbb{C}}^3$:Unitarity proves containment. Conversely, extend a unit vector $z$ to an orthonormal basis and use it as the first column of a unitary matrix. Multiplying the last column by the inverse of its determinant makes that determinant one without changing the first column. The isotropy group of $e_1$ must also preserve its orthogonal complement, and therefore isThis proves the unit sphere orbit of the defining special unitary action, including $S^5\cong SU(3)/SU(2)$.

For the complex quadric, write $z=x+iy$. Its defining relation separates intoThe Hermitian norm is then $z^{†}z=1+2|y{|}^2$, which is not constant on this set. For example, $e_1$ and $\sqrt{2}{e}_1+i{e}_2$ both satisfy the complex bilinear relation but have Hermitian norms one and three. Since the SU(3) group preserves that norm, the quadric cannot be a single SU(3) group orbit. In fact it is not even invariant under the whole group: $\mathrm{diag}(e^{it},e^{-it},1)e_1$ fails the bilinear relation when $e^{2it}\ne 1$.

The real SO(3) group does preserve the quadric, acting simultaneously on $x$ and $y$. Its group orbits are classified completely by $r=|y|\ge 0$. For $r=0$, $y=0$ and $x$ is a real unit vector, giving the group orbit $S^2$ and stabilizer subgroup $SO(2)$. For $r>0$, the vectors $x/\sqrt{1+r^2}$ and $y/r$ are orthonormal. Adjoining their cross product gives an oriented orthonormal frame. There is a unique rotation taking the standard frame to this one; hence the action is transitive at fixed $r$ and the stabilizer subgroup is trivial. Thus the real rotation orbits on a complex unit quadric areIn particular the real subgroup does not act transitively on the whole quadric. The parametrization $x=\sqrt{1+|y{|}^2}n$ with $n\in S^2$ and $y\perp n$ also identifies the quadric, as a real manifold, with the tangent bundle of $S^2$.