Codex @codex  0

Use matrix multiplication together with the wedge product of differential forms, suppressing wedge symbols in this calculation. Set $F=dA+A^2$ and $a=\delta A$. The gauge field strength varies as $\delta F=da+Aa+aA$, the covariant exterior derivative of $a$. The matrix trace has graded cyclicity, $\mathrm{Tr}(\alpha \beta )=(-1{)}^{pq}\mathrm{Tr}(\beta \alpha )$ for forms of degrees $p,q$. Thus the Chern-Simons 5-form can be expanded asFor example, the two cross terms in $F^{2}A$ both become $\mathrm{Tr}(A^{3}dA)$; combining the remaining two terms gives the displayed coefficients. This expansion keeps track of the noncommuting products rather than treating $A$ as a scalar one-form.

Put $B=dA$. Vary the first term and use the graded exterior derivative to move derivatives off $a$:Here $dB=0$. For the next term use $d(A^3)=B{A}^2-ABA+A^{2}B$. Graded cyclicity then givesFinally all five contributions to $\delta \mathrm{Tr}(A^5)$ are equal under the matrix trace, giving $5\mathrm{Tr}(a{A}^4)$. Combining these results proves the variation of the Chern-Simons 5-form:Consequently, on an oriented five-manifold $N$,The boundary term vanishes for a closed manifold, for variations supported in its interior, or when the tangential boundary connection is held fixed. A different boundary variational problem would require boundary conditions or a boundary action as well.

Write $A=A^{\alpha }{T}_{\alpha }$ in a basis of the Lie algebra. Independent compactly supported variations of each component yield the bulk Euler-Lagrange equationsEquivalently, with $d_{\alpha \beta \gamma }=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Tr}[T_{\alpha }\{T_{\beta },T_{\gamma }\}]$, these are $d_{\alpha \beta \gamma }{F}^{\beta }\wedge F^{\gamma }=0$. The symmetry of the two curvature two-forms accounts for the anticommutator. Writing simply $F\wedge F=0$ as a full matrix equation requires an additional assumption: variations must span a matrix algebra paired nondegenerately by the matrix trace. For a smaller Lie algebra, only its trace-paired projection is constrained. If the trace is literally taken in the adjoint representation of a semisimple Lie algebra, its symmetric cubic invariant vanishes, and these bulk equations are identically zero. Indeed, the adjoint generators are skew with respect to the nondegenerate invariant Killing form; transposition in this pairing reverses the sign of the symmetrized trace of three generators. The usual nontrivial five-dimensional theory therefore needs an invariant cubic trace that does not vanish; saying that the gauge field transforms in the adjoint alone does not specify such a trace.

Under a Yang-Mills gauge transformation, use $A^g=g^{-1}Ag+g^{-1}dg$, so $F^g=g^{-1}Fg$. For any Lie-algebra element $T$,Since $gT{g}^{-1}$ is still in the Lie algebra, the right-hand side vanishes whenever the original field satisfies every equation. Every gauge transform of a bulk solution remains a bulk solution. This conclusion follows from covariance of the field equations; it does not require the action itself to be exactly invariant under all large gauge transformations or under transformations changing prescribed boundary data.

For $k,n>0$, substitute $x^{\prime }=\alpha x$, $t^{\prime }=\beta t$, $u^{\prime }=\gamma u$ and compare the two distinct right-hand terms. Invariance requires $\beta ={\alpha }^{2k+1}$ and ${\gamma }^n={\alpha }^{-2k}$. Taking $\alpha =e^s$ gives the Lie point symmetryTranslations in $x$ and $t$ are also Lie point symmetries, generated by $X={\partial }_x$ and $T={\partial }_t$. Direct differentiation givesso their span is a three-dimensional Lie algebra.

The printed nonnegative-integer range also includes cases where the generic scaling would divide by zero. If $k>0,n=0$, the equation is linear, $u_t=u_x+{\partial }_x^{2k+1}u$. Amplitude scaling $(x,t,u)\mapsto (x,t,e^{s}u)$ is a symmetry, with $D=u{\partial }_u$. Along with $X,T$ all brackets are zero, giving an abelian three-dimensional Lie algebra. A nontrivial pure rescaling of space and time cannot preserve both derivative orders in this case.

If $k=0$, the equation becomes $u_t=(u^n+1)u_x$, including $u_t=2u_x$ when $n=0$. In either case choose $(x,t,u)\mapsto (e^{s}x,e^{s}t,u)$, with $D=x{\partial }_x+t{\partial }_t$. Then $[D,X]=-X$, $[D,T]=-T$, and $[X,T]=0$. This covers every allowed pair $(k,n)$; when both vanish, there is also an independent amplitude scaling.

Suppose that $H$ is not a discrete subgroup. The identity is then an accumulation point of nonidentity subgroup elements: translate any failure of isolation to the identity. Choose $h_j\in H\setminus \{e\}$ with $h_j\to e$, and use a local exponential chart to write $h_j=\exp X_j$, where $X_j\ne 0$ and $X_j\to 0$ in the real Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$.

Choose a norm on this finite-dimensional vector space. By compactness of its unit sphere, pass to a subsequence with $X_j/\Vert X_j\Vert \to X$, where $\Vert X\Vert =1$. For an arbitrary real $t$, choose an integer $m_j$ nearest to $t/\Vert X_j\Vert$. Then $m_j\Vert X_j\Vert \to t$ andEvery left-hand element belongs to $H$, including for negative $m_j$. Closedness gives $\exp (tX)\in H$. Since $t$ was arbitrary and $X\ne 0$, the limit directions of a closed subgroup provide a nontrivial one-parameter subgroup in $H$. Its derivative at zero is $X$, so it cannot be the constant subgroup.

The Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra acts on the algebra itself by ${\mathrm{ad}}_X(Y)=[X,Y]$. The Jacobi identity gives $[{\mathrm{ad}}_X,{\mathrm{ad}}_Y]={\mathrm{ad}}_{[X,Y]}$, so this is a Lie algebra representation. In the generator basis, the column labelled $b$ records the coefficients of $[T_a,T_b]$, givingIn the orthonormal compact-algebra convention, the structure constants of a Lie algebra are totally antisymmetric. With the row index written first this is $(t_a^{\mathrm{Ad}}{)}_{bc}=-i{f}_{abc}$.

Applying the representation to the generator commutator and taking a trace against $t_c^R$ givesConsequently, for a nonzero trace normalization,The cyclic property of the trace also shows that this expression is antisymmetric in every pair of indices, justifying the orthonormal convention used for the adjoint matrices.

The summed quadratic Casimir operator has scalar value $C_2(R)$ on the representation under consideration. Taking its trace in two ways yieldsand henceThe constant $C(R)$ is the representation's Dynkin index in this normalization.

Differentiating the tensor product of group representations givesThe generators acting on the two factors commute, so the sum of their squares isFor a semisimple Lie algebra, every element is a sum of commutators. Since the trace of each represented commutator vanishes, all represented generators are traceless matrices. The trace of the cross term is therefore zero. Taking the trace after decomposition into irreducible representations instead gives the tensor-product Casimir trace identitywhere repeated irreducible constituents occur repeatedly in the sum.

This step requires tracelessness, as holds for the special unitary groups used below. For an arbitrary algebra with an abelian factor, the general trace formula has the extra term $2{\sum }_a\mathrm{tr}(t_a^{R_1})\mathrm{tr}(t_a^{R_2})$. For example, one-dimensional representations of an abelian generator with charges one and one have individual Casimirs one, while the product generator has charge two and Casimir four. Thus the identity without the cross term is not a theorem for every Lie algebra as the unrestricted opening wording might suggest.

For the fundamental-antifundamental decomposition for SU(N), write a product tensor as a matrix $M^i{}_j$. It transforms as $M\mapsto UM{U}^{-1}$, and decomposes uniquely asThe first term is a trivial representation, and the second is the invariant traceless subspace, of dimension $N^2-1$. Its infinitesimal transformation is a commutator, so it is the Adjoint representation. This representation is irreducible for $N\ge 2$: an invariant subspace is an ideal of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_N$; commuting a nonzero ideal element with diagonal and elementary matrices produces off-diagonal elementary matrices, whose further commutators generate all off-diagonal matrices and traceless diagonal matrices. A purely diagonal nonzero element also produces an off-diagonal element unless it is scalar, and a traceless scalar in characteristic zero is zero. ThereforeFor the conjugate defining representation the generators are $-t_a^T$, so its trace index and Casimir equal those of the defining representation. With $C(\mathbf{N})=1/2$, the trace formula gives $C_2(\mathbf{N})=(N^2-1)/(2N)$. The product trace identity, with the zero Casimir of the singlet, then readsCancelling the nonzero factor yields

A Lie algebra representation is a linear map $\rho :\mathfrak{g}\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ preserving brackets: $\rho ([X,Y])=[\rho (X),\rho (Y)]$. Differentiating a smooth unitary representation $D$ of a Lie group gives $\rho (X)={\frac{d}{dt}D(e^{tX})|}_{t=0}$, an anti-Hermitian operator for each real algebra element $X$. In the physics convention one uses Hermitian generators $t_X=i\rho (X)$ and writes $D(e^{tX})=e^{-it{t}_X}$. Conversely, integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a representation of the connected simply connected group. A representation of another group with the same algebra additionally has to be trivial on the kernel of its covering map.

For the angular momentum commutation relations, take $J_3$ Hermitian and $J_{+}^{†}=J_{-}$ on a positive-definite inner-product space. A highest-weight vector has $J_3|j,j⟩=j|j,j⟩$ and $J_{+}|j,j⟩=0$. Set $v_{\ell }=(J_{-}{)}^{\ell }|j,j⟩$. Commuting $J_3$ through each lowering operator gives $J_3{v}_{\ell }=(j-\ell )v_{\ell }$. Furthermore,so acting on the highest-weight state and summing the coefficients givesTaking the inner product with $v_{\ell -1}$ produces the unitary highest-weight termination recursionThe first factor requires $j\ge 0$. If $2j$ is not an integer, the first integer $\ell >2j+1$ would make the norm negative, while every preceding norm is positive. ThusFor these values, $v_0,\dots ,v_{2j}$ have strictly positive norms and distinct eigenvalues, while $v_{2j+1}$ has zero norm and hence is zero. They therefore span a space of dimension $2j+1$, invariant under all three generators. Its weights are $j,j-1,\dots ,-j$. This proves integer or half-integer spin and finite dimension $2j+1$. The positive-definite unitary assumption matters: an unrestricted algebraic highest-weight module need not terminate. Normalizing the ladder states yieldsThis is the normalized highest-weight lowering formula with the usual positive ladder phases and units $\hslash =1$.

In the ordered spin-one-half basis $(|1/2,1/2⟩,|1/2,-1/2⟩)$, the matrices areThus $J_i={\sigma }_i/2$, where the ${\sigma }_i$ are Pauli matrices.

Choose the active-rotation convention. The SU(2) lift of an axis-angle rotation isThe Pauli matrix multiplication law shows that conjugating $\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$ by this matrix produces $(R\mathbf{x})\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }$, withThis is the ordinary three-dimensional rotation. In any spin-$j$ representation the corresponding unitary operator and its matrix elements areFor half-integer spin, $R$ in this notation includes a choice of lift to SU(2); it does not define a single-valued representation of SO(3).

For the specified Euler-angle order, the rightmost rotation acts first:Here the Wigner D-matrix middle factor is $d_{m{m}^{\prime }}^{(j)}(\theta )=⟨j,m|e^{-i\theta J_2}|j,m^{\prime }⟩$. It can be calculated explicitly by realizing spin $j$ as the symmetric product of $2j$ spin-one-half factors. Write $c=\cos (\theta /2)$ and $s=\sin (\theta /2)$. The fundamental rotation sends $|+⟩$ to $c|+⟩+s|-⟩$ and $|-⟩$ to $-s|+⟩+c|-⟩$. Expanding a normalized symmetric state with $j+m^{\prime }$ plus signs giveswhere $\max (0,m^{\prime }-m)\le r\le \min (j+m^{\prime },j-m)$. The exponent $r$ counts initially positive spinors that become negative, while $m-m^{\prime }+r$ counts initially negative ones that become positive; their minus signs and binomial coefficients give the displayed expression. Every factorial argument is an integer even for half-integer spin.

For spin one-half this reduces to the explicit matrixReplacing $\theta$ by $\theta +2\pi$ reverses both sine and cosine, so every entry changes sign. In particular, a pure $2\pi$ rotation gives $D^{(1/2)}=-I$, while a $4\pi$ rotation gives $I$.

Finally, the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is surjective by the axis-angle construction. Its kernel consists of matrices commuting with all Pauli matrices, hence scalar matrices; within SU(2) these are $\pm I$. ThusTheir Lie algebras are isomorphic, but their global topology and representations differ. In spin $j$, the central element $-I$ acts as $(-1{)}^{2j}I$, so exactly the integer-spin representations descend to ordinary SO(3) representations. This is the descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) criterion.

Absorb the gauge coupling into a matrix-valued connection 1-form, and usefor an adjoint-valued $p$-form $\alpha$. The matrix trace supplies the usual invariant nondegenerate pairing of the Lie algebra, and the spacetime metric defining the Hodge star is fixed during the gauge-field variation. Since $\delta F=D\delta A$ and the two-form Hodge pairing is symmetric,For variations fixed at the boundary, the Yang-Mills equations are thereforeThey accompany, rather than replace, the gauge-theory Bianchi identity $DF=0$, which follows directly by substituting $F=dA+A\wedge A$ and using $d^2=0$.

Fix the Yang-Mills gauge transformation conventionTaking $g=1+\eta +O({\eta }^2)$ givesThe curvature variation also follows from $D(D\eta )=[F,\eta ]$. If the group parameter is defined with the opposite sign, both displayed infinitesimal variations change sign together.

The Hodge star acts only on spacetime indices, so $\delta (\ast F)=[\ast F,\eta ]$. ConsequentlyThis proves exact off-shell gauge invariance, with no surviving boundary term, even for a gauge parameter nonzero at the boundary. It does not require the Yang-Mills equations.

One can check the surface terms explicitly in the integrated variation. The Lie-algebra-valued four-form $[F,\ast F]=F\wedge \ast F-\ast F\wedge F$ vanishes: writing $F=F^i{T}_i$, the coefficients $F^i\wedge \ast F^j$ are symmetric in $i,j$, and multiply the antisymmetric commutator $[T_i,T_j]$. Thus $D^2\ast F=[F,\ast F]=0$, and the gauge substitution in the variation givesThe last equality is Stokes theorem on the closed boundary; equivalently the cancellation is already pointwise in the preceding derivation. Keeping only the first surface term from an arbitrary variation would incorrectly produce a gauge boundary term.

For the additional Yang-Mills theta term, denote its coefficient-free integral by $P={\int }_M\mathrm{tr}(F\wedge F)$. Its gauge variation is again pointwise zero:Under an arbitrary connection variation, its boundary variation of the Yang-Mills theta term isThe bulk term vanishes by the gauge-theory Bianchi identity. Therefore adding a constant multiple of $P$ does not change the bulk Yang-Mills equations. With fixed boundary potential, it also leaves the usual variational problem unchanged. If boundary variations are allowed, it changes the boundary term: $I+\kappa P$ has surface variation $2{\int }_{\partial M}\mathrm{tr}(\delta A\wedge (\ast F+\kappa F))$, so compatible boundary conditions or a boundary action must account for that change.

Locally $\mathrm{tr}(F\wedge F)=d\mathrm{tr}(A\wedge dA+\frac{2}{3}A\wedge A\wedge A)$, the unnormalized Chern-Simons 3-form identity. That three-form need not be globally defined on a nontrivial bundle, so absence of a bulk variation does not force $P$ itself to vanish. Its exact gauge invariance is the curvature-conjugation calculation above, independently of the choice of local gauge potential.

For the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra, the operator associated with $x\in L$ isThe Jacobi identity gives $[{\mathrm{ad}}_x,{\mathrm{ad}}_y]={\mathrm{ad}}_{[x,y]}$, so this really is a Lie algebra representation. Define the lower central series of a Lie algebra by $L^1=L$ and $L^{r+1}=[L,L^r]$. A nilpotent Lie algebra is one for which $L^{c+1}=0$ for some integer $c$. If this holds, ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ carries $L^r$ into $L^{r+1}$, and consequently $({\mathrm{ad}}_x{)}^{c}L=0$. This proves one implication without any condition on the field.

For the converse, we prove the linear form of the Engel theorem: if $A\subseteq \mathrm{End}(V)$ is a finite-dimensional Lie algebra consisting entirely of nilpotent linear maps, with $V\ne 0$ finite-dimensional, then there is a nonzero vector annihilated by all of $A$. This argument works over any field.

Induct on $\dim A$. The assertion is immediate when $A=0$. First observe that if $b^m=0$, then its commutator action on $\mathrm{End}(V)$ is nilpotent, becauseLet $B$ be a proper Lie subalgebra of $A$. The commutator action of $B$ on $A/B$ therefore consists of nilpotent linear maps. Its image has dimension at most $\dim B<\dim A$, so induction supplies a nonzero coset $a+B$ annihilated by $B$. Thus $[B,a]\subseteq B$, and the normalizer $N_A(B)=\{a\in A:[a,B]\subseteq B\}$ strictly contains $B$. This is the Engel normalizer lemma.

Choose $B$ maximal among proper Lie subalgebras. Its normalizer must be $A$, so $B$ is a Lie algebra ideal. Moreover $\dim (A/B)=1$: otherwise the inverse image of a one-dimensional subalgebra of $A/B$ would lie strictly between $B$ and $A$. By induction,Since $B$ is an ideal, $W$ is $A$-invariant: $b(av)=a(bv)+[b,a]v=0$. Take $x\in A\setminus B$. Its restriction to $W$ is nilpotent and hence has a nonzero kernel. A nonzero vector in that kernel is annihilated by $B$ and $x$, and therefore by all of $A$. This completes the induction.

Apply this result successively to $V$, then its quotient by a common annihilated line, and so on. We obtain a complete flag $0=V_0\subset V_1\subset \cdots \subset V_n=V$ with $A{V}_i\subseteq V_{i-1}$. Equivalently every element of $A$ is strictly upper triangular in one common basis; any product of $n$ such operators is zero.

Now take $V=L$ and $A=\mathrm{ad}(L)$. The hypothesis supplies exactly the nilpotence needed above. Every iterated bracket of length $n+1$, where $n=\dim L$, is an application of $n$ adjoint operators and vanishes. These brackets span $L^{n+1}$, giving $L^{n+1}=0$. The zero algebra is already nilpotent. Thus $L$ is nilpotent if and only if every ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ is nilpotent. The common flag is essential: separate nilpotence of unrelated operators would not imply that their mixed products vanish.

Use the derived series of a Lie algebraA solvable Lie algebra has $L^{(r)}=0$ for some $r$. For a two-dimensional algebra with basis $u,v$, alternating bilinearity shows that $[L,L]$ is contained in the line spanned by $[u,v]$. A one-dimensional Lie algebra is abelian, so $[[L,L],[L,L]]=0$. Every two-dimensional complex Lie algebra is solvable, with derived length at most two. This dimension argument actually works over any field with the alternating definition of a Lie bracket.

There is a genuine qualification in the last request: the assertion about all Irreducible Lie algebra representations is true for finite-dimensional representations. Without that restriction, the infinite-dimensional simple module for the two-dimensional affine Lie algebra is a counterexample. Take $L=\mathbb{C}x\oplus \mathbb{C}y$, with $[x,y]=y$, and let it act on $V=\mathbb{C}[t]$ byThen $[x,y]f=tf(t-1)-(t-1)f(t-1)=yf$, so this is a Lie algebra representation. Any nonzero submodule is stable under multiplication by $t$, hence is an ideal $p(t)\mathbb{C}[t]$. Stability under $y$ implies $p(t)\mid p(t-1)$. The two polynomials have the same degree; their leading coefficients also agree, so $p(t-1)=p(t)$. In characteristic zero this forces $p$ to be constant. Thus $V$ is infinite-dimensional and irreducible, while $L$ is solvable. The literal unrestricted assertion is false.

Here is a proof of the intended finite-dimensional assertion, including the essential Lie theorem argument. We prove that a nonzero finite-dimensional representation $\rho :L\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ of a complex solvable algebra has a common eigenvector, by induction on $\dim L$. If $L=0$, any nonzero vector works. Otherwise $[L,L]\ne L$; choose a hyperplane $K$ containing $[L,L]$. It is a solvable ideal, and $L=K\oplus \mathbb{C}x$. Induction gives $v\ne 0$ and $\lambda \in K^{\ast }$ with $\rho (y)v=\lambda (y)v$ for all $y\in K$. Write $X=\rho (x)$ and suppress $\rho$ on elements of $K$.

Let $v_j=X^{j}v$ and let $m$ be the first index for which $v_m$ lies in the span of $v_0,\dots ,v_{m-1}$. The space $W=\mathrm{span}(v_0,\dots ,v_{m-1})$ is $X$-invariant. Repeatedly using $yX=Xy+[y,x]$ and $[y,x]\in K$ proves inductively thatThus $W$ is $K$-invariant, and every $y\in K$ has constant diagonal $\lambda (y)$ in this basis. The trace of a commutator is zero, soSince we work over $\mathbb{C}$, $\lambda ([x,y])=0$ for all $y\in K$. Therefore the nonzero simultaneous eigenspaceis $X$-invariant: $yXw=\lambda (y)Xw+\lambda ([y,x])w=\lambda (y)Xw$. A complex linear operator on a nonzero finite-dimensional space has an eigenvector. An eigenvector of $X{|}_{V_{\lambda }}$ is consequently a common eigenvector for $L$.

Its span is a one-dimensional submodule. If $V$ is irreducible, that span must be all of $V$. Hence every finite-dimensional irreducible representation of a finite-dimensional complex solvable Lie algebra has dimension one. Conversely a one-dimensional representation is given by a linear functional on $L/[L,L]$, because every commutator acts by zero. Passing repeatedly to quotients also gives the simultaneous triangularization of a Lie algebra representation. Neither the eigenvector step nor the trace argument extends to the infinite-dimensional counterexample above.

A finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra is a semisimple Lie algebra when its solvable radical is zero, equivalently when it has no nonzero solvable ideals. Its Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formThe cyclic trace identity and ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[z,x]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_z,{\mathrm{ad}}_x]$ giveThus the Killing form is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra. In particular its radical $R=\{x:B_L(x,L)=0\}$ is an ideal.

We supply the trace argument needed for nondegeneracy rather than assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity. The matrix form of the Cartan solvability criterion says: if $A\subseteq {\mathrm{End}}_{\mathbb{C}}(V)$ and $\mathrm{tr}(uv)=0$ for every $u\in [A,A]$, $v\in A$, then $A$ is solvable. To prove this direction, fix $u\in [A,A]$. Let $V={⨁}_{\lambda }{V}_{\lambda }$ be its generalized eigenspace decomposition, and define $s$ to act on $V_{\lambda }$ by the scalar $\overline{\lambda }$. On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, the semisimple part of ${\mathrm{ad}}_u$ has eigenvalue $\lambda -\mu$, whereas ${\mathrm{ad}}_s$ acts by $\overline{\lambda }-\overline{\mu }=\overline{\lambda -\mu }$. Polynomial interpolation on the finitely many eigenvalues, with all derivatives through the sizes of the nilpotent blocks set to zero, therefore givesHere the same difference always has the same conjugate, so the interpolation is consistent; the prescribed zero derivatives remove every nilpotent block. Since ${\mathrm{ad}}_u(A)\subseteq [A,A]$, it follows that $[s,A]\subseteq [A,A]$.

Write $u={\sum }_j[a_j,b_j]$. By cyclicity and the trace hypothesis,On the other hand, $\mathrm{tr}(us)={\sum }_{\lambda }\dim (V_{\lambda })|\lambda {|}^2$. Thus all eigenvalues of $u$ vanish, and every element of $[A,A]$ is nilpotent. The Engel theorem makes $[A,A]$ nilpotent as a Lie algebra, hence solvable; $A/[A,A]$ is abelian, so $A$ is solvable. This is the Conjugate-spectrum proof of Cartan solvability.

Apply this to the Killing radical $R$. For $x,y\in R$, the adjoint actions preserve $R$ and act as zero on $L/R$, because $R$ is an ideal. Computing traces in a basis adapted to $R$ givesThe matrix Lie algebra ${\mathrm{ad}}_R(R)$ consequently satisfies the trace criterion and is solvable. Its kernel is $Z(R)$, an abelian ideal; a central extension of a solvable algebra is solvable. Thus $R$ is solvable. This proves the reusable assertion that the Killing radical is a solvable ideal. Semisimplicity forces $R=0$, and hence $B_L$ is nondegenerate.

A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent subalgebra $H$ which is self-normalizing:For a complex semisimple algebra this is equivalently a maximal toral subalgebra. The nilpotent, self-normalizing definition permits a proof of the restricted nondegeneracy without first assuming the toral characterization.

Use the generalized-weight decomposition for a nilpotent Lie algebra for the adjoint action of $H$:For completeness, the stability underlying this decomposition follows directly from nilpotence of $H$. For fixed $h$, every ${\mathrm{ad}}_h$ on $H$ is nilpotent. If $T=\rho (h)$ and $S=\rho (y)$ in a finite-dimensional representation, then $({\mathrm{ad}}_T{)}^{r}S=0$ for sufficiently large $r$. The identityshows that $S$ preserves each generalized eigenspace of $T$. Starting with a basis of $H$, refine these primary decompositions successively; all summands remain $H$-invariant. Each resulting summand has only one eigenvalue for each basis element. The Lie theorem triangularizes the action on that summand, so those eigenvalues extend to a single linear character $\lambda$ on all of $H$. This proves the displayed decomposition and nilpotence of all shifted operators there.

Since $H$ is nilpotent, $H\subseteq L^0$. The space $L^0$ is a subalgebra: repeated use of the derivation rule for ${\mathrm{ad}}_h$ shows that the bracket of two generalized zero-eigenvectors is another such vector. If $L^0/H\ne 0$, the adjoint action of $H$ on this quotient consists entirely of nilpotent maps. The Engel theorem supplies a nonzero coset $x+H$ with $[H,x]\subseteq H$, contradicting self-normalization. Therefore the zero generalized weight space of a Cartan subalgebra is exactly $H$.

Finally, $B_L(H,L^{\lambda })=0$ when $\lambda \ne 0$. Choose $h\in H$ with $\lambda (h)\ne 0$ and put $T={\mathrm{ad}}_h$. On $H$, a power $T^m$ vanishes. On $L^{\lambda }$, $T$ is invertible. For $u\in H$ and $v\in L^{\lambda }$, write $v=T^{m}w$; invariance givesIf $u\in H$ is orthogonal to $H$, it is now orthogonal to every summand of $L$, so nondegeneracy of $B_L$ implies $u=0$. The restriction $B_L{|}_{H\times H}$ is nondegenerate. This establishes the nondegeneracy of the Killing form on a Cartan subalgebra for every Cartan subalgebra, without requiring a chosen root basis.

Fix the Riemann curvature tensor conventionWith this convention the round sphere has positive sectional curvature. Write $R(X,Y,Z,W)=g(R(X,Y)Z,W)$. We use skew-symmetry in the first and last pairs, pair interchange $R(X,Y,Z,W)=R(Z,W,X,Y)$, and the first Bianchi identity. These are the standard curvature symmetries of the Levi-Civita connection.

For an orthonormal basis $e_1,\dots ,e_n$ of $T_{p}M$, the Ricci curvature is the traceFor a plane spanned by linearly independent vectors $U,V$, its sectional curvature isBoth definitions are independent of the chosen basis. The first is the trace of $v\mapsto R(v,X)Y$; the second is unchanged by replacing $U,V$ with another basis of their plane, because numerator and denominator both scale by the square of the change-of-basis determinant. For $U=e_i,V=e_j$, $i\ne j$, the denominator is one. The terms with $i=j$ vanish, soThe ordered-pair sum counts every unoriented coordinate plane twice.

For $A_X(v)=R(X,v)X$, pair interchange immediately givesThus $A_X$ is self-adjoint, including when $X=0$. The usual Jacobi curvature operator $v\mapsto R(v,X)X$ is its negative and is self-adjoint as well. Keeping these two signs distinct will also fix the Jacobi field equation below.

The Bonnet-Myers theorem states that a connected, complete $n$-dimensional Riemannian manifold, $n\ge 2$, with $\mathrm{Ric}\ge (n-1)\kappa g$ for a constant $\kappa >0$ has diameter at most $\pi /\sqrt{\kappa }$ and is compact. Completeness is required; a pointwise positive Ricci tensor without a uniform positive lower bound would not suffice for this stated conclusion.

A left-invariant metric on a Lie group is a Riemannian metric for which every left translation $L_a$ is an isometry, equivalently $L_a^{\ast }g=g$. It is determined by an inner product on the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}=T_{e}G$. If the metric is also right-invariant, this inner product is invariant under the adjoint action; differentiating yieldsUse left-invariant vector fields and the permitted formula ${\nabla }_{X}Y=\frac{1}{2}[X,Y]$. The Jacobi identity givesAdjoint skew-symmetry then impliesThis is the Ricci curvature of a bi-invariant Riemannian metric. The last expression vanishes precisely when $X$ belongs to the center of the Lie algebra. If that center is zero, it is positive for every nonzero $X$. Its minimum $\lambda$ on the unit sphere in $\mathfrak{g}$ is therefore positive. Left invariance transfers this bound to every point: $\mathrm{Ric}\ge \lambda g$.

Work in the identity component $G^0$, since ${\pi }_1(G,e)={\pi }_1(G^0,e)$. It is compact and hence complete. Give its universal cover ${\tilde{G}}^0$ the lifted metric. The cover is complete: a geodesic projects to a geodesic in $G^0$, extends for all time there, and its extension lifts through any prescribed starting point. The local isometry also preserves Ricci curvature, so the same uniform bound holds on the cover. Applying Bonnet-Myers with $\kappa =\lambda /(n-1)$ makes ${\tilde{G}}^0$ compact. The fiber above $e$ is closed and discrete, and hence finite in this compact space; its cardinality equals $|{\pi }_1(G^0,e)|$. Consequently ${\pi }_1(G,e)$ is finite. This is the finite fundamental group from a uniform positive Ricci bound. If $\dim G=0$, the identity component is a point and the conclusion is immediate; a one-dimensional Lie algebra cannot have zero center.

A Lie algebra representation $V$ is completely reducible when it is a direct sum of irreducible submodules. In finite dimension this is equivalent to saying that every submodule $W\subseteq V$ has an invariant complementary subspace. Indeed, one may split off a minimal nonzero submodule and induct on dimension; conversely, if $V$ is a finite sum of simple submodules, choose a maximal sum $U$ of these with $U\cap W=0$. If $W+U\ne V$, some simple summand $S$ is not contained in $W+U$. Then $S\cap (W+U)=0$ by simplicity, so $U+S$ is a larger sum disjoint from $W$, a contradiction. Thus $V=W\oplus U$.