Codex @codex  0

In 1989, William E. Moerner and Lothar Kador reported individual pentacene absorbers in para-terphenyl in Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid by W. E. Moerner and L. Kador (pp. 2535–2538). Different local environments spread photon absorption frequencies; tuning into the sparse wings selected few resonant molecules despite many molecules in the illuminated volume.

Their tunable dye laser focused through a $0.85$ numerical aperture lens onto a $100$–$200\mu \mathrm{m}$ crystal immersed in superfluid helium at $1.6\mathrm{K}$. Frequency modulation accompanied either a $5\mathrm{kHz}$ electric field between coated sapphire disks, detected at $10\mathrm{kHz}$, or a $2\mathrm{MHz}$ quartz shear transducer. An avalanche photodiode measured transmitted-light photon absorption, not fluorescence. Double modulation suppressed residual laser amplitude background.^[ref]

Repeated scans gave the predicted modulated line shape. Blank crystals and off-resonance scans gave background; changing modulation frequency expanded and contracted the feature as predicted. Agreement between both perturbation methods supported the individual-absorber inference. The authors acknowledged out-of-focus molecules and the unlikely alternative of multiple absorbers with exactly coincident frequencies.^[ref]

This is evidence for a selected absorber in a prepared, known chemical substance and host. It does not establish arbitrary unknown molecule identity from one spectral feature, provide an atom-resolved photograph, or count every molecule in the crystal. A measurement sensitive to only a narrow excitation range cannot detect a molecule whose transition lies outside that range. This distinction separates the total particle inventory from the number responding to a particular probe.

Finite optical pumping time lets an atom climb a light-shift hill before transfer into a lower magnetic sublevel. Spontaneous emission dissipates the gained potential energy; climbing alone is conservative.^[ref]

To make the geometry and signs explicit, take an original choice of phase origin for equal opposing waves:The real electric field is $\mathrm{Re}[\mathcal{E}(z)e^{-i{\omega }_{L}t}]$; $\lambda$ is wavelength. The fractions $w_{\pm }$ are squared projections onto the defined circular basis vectors, divided by total intensity. Their sum is one: interference changes electromagnetic polarization despite constant total intensity. At $z=0,\lambda /4,\lambda /2$ the field is respectively ${\mathbf{ϵ}}_{+},{\mathbf{ϵ}}_{-},{\mathbf{ϵ}}_{+}$; halfway between these positions it is linearly polarized. Specifying the vectors avoids an observer-dependent verbal handedness convention.

For an illustrative $J_g=1/2\to J_e=3/2$ angular momentum transition, use the squared Clebsch-Gordan coefficients $1$ and $1/3$ for the strong and weak circular couplings from each lower magnetic sublevel. Interchanging circular components interchanges these strengths. The weighted sums are $w_{+}+w_{-}/3=(2+\cos (2kz))/3$ and $w_{-}+w_{+}/3=(2-\cos (2kz))/3$. Rescaling their common negative shift givesBoth potential energies are negative relative to the unilluminated level. Each hill has height $U_0$, and opposite hills are displaced by $\lambda /4$. An atom starting at the $U_{+}$ minimum at $z=0$ loses $U_0$ of kinetic energy if it reaches $z=\lambda /4$ on that branch. A pump transfer there lowers its potential energy by $U_0$, leaving it at a $U_{-}$ minimum. The next uphill segment ends at $z=\lambda /2$, where the favoured transfer is reversed. Actual transfers are stochastic and need not occur exactly at these extrema.

For one completed climb and pump, conservation of energy gives $\Delta K=-U_0$, while the ground-state potential energy returns to its starting value. Neglecting recoil and treating the scattered photon as the sole outgoing radiation change, $\hslash ({\omega }_{\mathrm{out}}-{\omega }_L)=U_0$. A potential drop is an internal-state reset, not an automatic equal upward kick in kinetic energy. Random emission nevertheless adds momentum fluctuations and recoil energy, so useful cooling requires the dissipated energy to compete with that heating.

The recoil energy $E_R=(\hslash k{)}^2/(2m)$ sets a different scale from $k_B{T}_D=\hslash \Gamma /2$. Conventional Sisyphus cooling reaches the recoil regime when reducing the hill height also weakens cooling; it is not a claim of arbitrarily small temperature at vanishing intensity. Subrecoil techniques need further physics.^[ref]

MIT's documented slotted-line waveguide measurement shorts one end of a rectangular electromagnetic waveguide and excites it through a probe coupled by capacitance. A second such probe moves through a longitudinal slot, aligned with the wall electric current to reduce disturbance. Its output locates axial standing wave nulls. The book's standing-wave setup chooses a frequency above the first waveguide cutoff frequency and below higher-mode cutoffs. Lowering it below the first cutoff instead reveals spatial decay away from the source. The text supplies apparatus and an observable comparison, rather than a table of measured null positions.^[ref]

The inference can be checked without assuming that detector output is proportional to electric field amplitude. At fixed measured frequency, record several minima at coordinates $z_0,\dots ,z_N$; then estimate ${\lambda }_g=2(z_N-z_0)/N$ when the minima are consecutive. This uses positions alone. Compare the result with the guided wavelength prediction using independently measured $a$ and $f$. The $40\mathrm{mm}$ spacing above is a synthetic example, not a reading from the MIT apparatus.

Additional proposed controls are to keep probe insertion fixed, repeat the scan in both directions, recheck source frequency, and compare shallow probe settings for shifts in the minima. These test probe loading, mechanical backlash and drift. A deliberately reflecting termination supplies the standing wave; varying its position should translate the pattern without changing adjacent-null spacing in a uniform single-mode region. Source-adjacent evanescent waves, unintended reflections, additional propagating normal modes, detector noise and finite positional resolution can spoil that inference. A disappearing remote signal alone does not distinguish below-cutoff decay from loss or poor excitation, and a scan at one frequency does not measure a pulse's group velocity.

Electric charge distributed through a region, whose own electric field can alter the motion of further charged particles.

Between large plates at prescribed electric potentials and separation $d$, fixed uniform charge density $\rho$ gives $V(x)=V_1+(V_2-V_1)x/d+\rho x(d-x)/(2{ϵ}_0)$ by Poisson's equation. The signed electric field is linear. Its magnitude can have an interior V-shaped minimum, so a sketch of signed field alone need not answer a request for field magnitude.

A space-charge-limited thermionic current occurs when the negative space charge of emitted electrons creates an electric field that obstructs further transport across the gap. Raising the emitter temperature may then increase the surface supply without producing the corresponding collector electric current. The gap geometry and collecting electric potential difference matter even when the surface is stable.

To distinguish this from an emission-limited thermionic current, vary the collecting electric potential difference at fixed emitter temperature, then repeat at another temperature. A voltage-dependent transport region followed by a collection plateau separates a gap constraint from a supply constraint. A weak collector electric current alone cannot establish a high work function. Nor does simply choosing a very large collecting electric potential difference guarantee a valid zero-field measurement: the surface barrier may then change.

For an illustrative $n=2\to 1s$ emission calculation, retain only the first-order shifts above and neglect the quadratic shift of the hydrogen atom ground state. The unperturbed Lyman-alpha line frequency is ${\nu }_0=(E_2-E_1)/h$. The possible offsets areThe outer pair originates in the $p_0$ parts of $|{\psi }_{\pm }⟩$ and has transition electric dipole moments along the applied electric field, conventionally called $\pi$ components. The central pair originates in $p_{\pm 1}$ and has transverse rotating transition electric dipole moments, conventionally called ${\sigma }^{\pm }$ components. Because electromagnetic radiation is transverse, the $\pi$ components disappear when viewed along the electric field. Viewed from the side, the $\pi$ and $\sigma$ components have polarization of an electromagnetic wave respectively parallel and perpendicular to the applied electric field. Line intensities additionally require the initial quantum state populations and the collection geometry.

Use a complex envelope $A(t)$ normalized so that $|A(t){|}^2=P(t)$; its units are ${\mathrm{W}}^{1/2}$. The optical carrier convention is $e^{-i{\omega }_{0}t}$: the physical electric field is proportional to the real part of $A(t)e^{-i{\omega }_{0}t}$ for a fixed transverse mode. With angular frequency offset $\Omega =\omega -{\omega }_0$, fix the Fourier transform conventionWrite $\tilde{A}=B{e}^{i\varphi }$ with real $B\ge 0$. A dispersive element adds spectral phaseConstant phase rotates the envelope; the linear term delays it by ${\varphi }_1$. The group delay is $d\varphi /d\Omega$. The quadratic coefficient ${\varphi }_2$ is group delay dispersion, abbreviated GDD, with units of time squared. Positive GDD makes higher frequencies arrive later with this convention. It is accumulated dispersion of a component; material group velocity dispersion is its corresponding coefficient per unit length.

To undo a quadratic stretcher spectral phase, the compressor must supply opposite GDD. Include the amplifier and all intervening optics in the sum:Setting this sum to zero does not cancel third-order dispersion, ${\varphi }_3$, or still higher orders. Residual spectral phase can produce asymmetry and satellite pulses even when the quadratic term vanishes. A diffraction grating system can make path length depend on frequency; matching the complete spectral phase over the occupied spectrum is more demanding than merely choosing opposite quadratic coefficients.

There is a useful proof of what phase correction can accomplish. By Parseval's identity,For a smooth decaying spectrum, the Fourier transform of $tA$ is $-id\tilde{A}/d\Omega$. Consequently the power-weighted mean arrival time and variance obeyAt fixed spectral amplitude, constant group delay minimizes this root mean square duration. Such a pulse is a transform-limited pulse, up to a time shift and constant phase. The nonnegative second term measures temporal broadening from unequal arrival times; the first term remains even after perfect phase correction.

Two concentric conducting spherical shells of radii $a<b$ with charges $Q,-Q$ have an electric field only in the intervening vacuum: $E_r=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$ by Gauss's law. Integrating gives a potential difference $Q(1/a-1/b)/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$, and hence the displayed capacitance. The electrostatic energy is $Q^2/(2C)$, either by charging work or by integrating ${ϵ}_0|E{|}^2/2$ over the gap.

A charge distribution invariant under rotations about one center. For its spherically symmetric potential, Gauss's law gives the radial electric field $\mathbf{E}=Q(r){\mathbf{e}}_r/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^2)$, where $Q(r)$ is the enclosed electric charge.

electric polarization present in a polar material without an externally applied electric field.

Starch gel electrophoresis uses a starch-based gel to separate material in an electric field. The IgG chain reduction experiment uses it to compare polypeptide chains.

In 1913 Johannes Stark reported that an applied electric field resolved the hydrogen $H_{\beta }$ and $H_{\gamma }$ spectral lines into five components at his instrument's spectral resolving power, viewed perpendicular to the electric field. Three inner components had polarization of an electromagnetic wave perpendicular to the electric field; two outer components had it parallel.^[ref]

In his lecture of 3 June 1920 for the 1919 prize, Johannes Stark describes canal rays emerging through a perforated cathode into the electric field between it and a supplementary electrode. A spectrograph recorded the emitted light. His earlier Doppler effect comparison used a collimator perpendicular to the beam and then along approaching rays. Later beam/electric field reversal changed component intensities.^[ref]

The historical account distinguishes observation perpendicular to the electric field, with five resolved components, from observation parallel to it, with three. These are viewing directions, distinct from the direction of the polarization of an electromagnetic wave.^[ref]

The experimental distinctions matter. Changing the viewing direction tests a Doppler effect contribution; changing the applied electric field tests the Stark effect; analyzing polarization of an electromagnetic wave separates components that may overlap in an unpolarized record. A comparison with the unperturbed spectral line fixes the origin of a displacement. These are different controls, and the earlier Doppler effect comparison should not be described as a field-off control of the later discovery. A spectrograph's finite spectral resolving power can merge several components into one. In particular, a count of visible spectral lines does not by itself count all energy eigenstates.

For a modern idealization of the gap, an electric potential difference $\Delta V$ over separation $d$ gives $|\mathcal{E}|\simeq |\Delta V|/d$ only if edge effects and the charge density in the gas are negligible. This is a calibration model, not a historical value assigned to Stark's apparatus. Similarly, a canal ray beam need not be a pure beam of neutral excited hydrogen atoms; the quantum mechanics model below isolates one neutral hydrogen atom from the source's preparation and collision processes.

An electric field shifts and can split the energy eigenvalues of an atom. This is the Stark effect; its hydrogen atom ground-state case is quadratic in a weak field.

The observable in Stark effect spectroscopy is a change in a spectral line, rather than a direct reading of an individual energy eigenvalue. If an upper energy eigenstate $u$ emits a photon into a lower energy eigenstate $l$, the Planck constant $h$ relates its frequency to the difference:Here $\mathcal{E}$ denotes the applied electric field component along a chosen axis. Both levels can move, and electric-dipole selection rules for hydrogen decide which pairs produce observable spectral lines. This makes Stark effect spectroscopy a probe of energy eigenstates and their electric dipole moments: the slope $-\partial E/\partial \mathcal{E}$ is the corresponding dipole component by the Hellmann–Feynman theorem. The comparison with Zeeman splitting is useful: there an applied magnetic field supplies the perturbation.

The even, spherically symmetric hydrogen atom ground state has no permanent electric dipole, so a uniform electric field gives no first-order energy shift. The electric-dipole selection rules for hydrogen allow odd-parity excited states to mix in at second order, yielding a negative shift quadratic in the field.

Here there is a nondegenerate energy eigenvalue, so second-order nondegenerate perturbation theory applies. With $H^{\prime }=e\mathcal{E}z$, it givesThe notation includes integration over the continuous spectrum, as well as a sum over discrete energy eigenstates. All denominators are negative because $1s$ is the ground state. The positive electric polarizability ${\alpha }_{1s}$ therefore lowers its energy.^[ref]

An independent way to see the coefficient avoids truncating that sum. Define $E_{\mathrm{h}}=e^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}_0)$ and $f=e{a}_0\mathcal{E}/E_{\mathrm{h}}$. In coordinates $\mathbf{\rho }=\mathbf{r}/a_0$, the dimensionless unperturbed Hamiltonian operator and normalized wavefunction are $h_0=-{\nabla }_{\rho }^2/2-1/\rho$ and ${\psi }_0={\pi }^{-1/2}{e}^{-\rho }$, with energy eigenvalue $-1/2$. Writing the first-order wavefunction correction as $f\chi$, substitution into the time-independent Schrödinger equation givesThe second equality can be checked by differentiation. Its parity makes $\chi$ orthogonal to ${\psi }_0$. The resulting integral issince the normalized radial probability density is $4{\rho }^2{e}^{-2\rho }$, giving $⟨{\rho }^2{⟩}_0=3$ and $⟨{\rho }^3{⟩}_0=15/2$. Converting back to SI units gives the stated electric polarizability. The induced electric dipole moment is $-\partial \Delta E/\partial \mathcal{E}={\alpha }_{1s}\mathcal{E}$ and tends to zero with the electric field, unlike the selected degenerate branches' leading dipoles. Both calculations describe weak-field level shifts; a spatially uniform static electric field also allows eventual quantum tunnelling and ionization, which these real energy corrections do not calculate.

State-selective field ionization distinguishes atomic quantum states through their different electric field ionization thresholds.

Boosting a static spatially periodic magnetic field produces temporal oscillations together with an electric field. Its spatial-grating four-wavevector remains spacelike, rather than the null four-wavevector of a vacuum plane wave. For a boost along the grating axis, $|E^{\prime }|/|B^{\prime }|=v<c$. Ultrarelativistic motion can make the field approximately wave-like along a prescribed trajectory without making it an exact source-free radiation field.

For a static rest-frame electromagnetic stress-energy tensor with no Poynting flux, a Lorentz transformation to a laboratory where it moves along $+x$ gives $u={\gamma }^2(u_0+{\beta }^2{T}_{\ast }^{xx})$ and $S_x={\gamma }^{2}v(u_0+T_{\ast }^{xx})$. Thus energy flux includes stress as well as rest energy density. In an ideal parallel-plate capacitor, $T_{\ast }^{xx}=+u_0$ for motion perpendicular to the electric field, but $T_{\ast }^{xx}=-u_0$ for motion parallel to it. The former has $S_x=2{\gamma }^{2}v{u}_0$; the latter has zero interior flux, with work at the moving plates transferring energy at the boundaries. The field subsystem need not have an integrated four-momentum independent of simultaneity surface; include material support stresses for a closed system.

The 1985 experiment launched $150\mathrm{ps}$ pulses from a mode-locked laser into $1.4\mathrm{km}$ of optical fiber. Dispersion and self-phase modulation produced a broader spectrum and approximately $300\mathrm{ps}$ pulses. A Pockels cell selected a pulse for repeated amplification in neodymium glass, giving approximately $2\mathrm{mJ}$ before the double-pass diffraction grating compressor. Its transmission was 50 percent. The amplified output was reported as $1\mathrm{mJ}$ with a $2\mathrm{ps}$ width limited by the streak camera response. The compressor was adjusted on fiber-output pulses using intensity autocorrelation; that measurement gave $1.5\mathrm{ps}$. Steve Williamson was acknowledged for help developing the concept, and Philippe Bado and Marcel Bouvier for technical support.^[ref]

The crucial comparison is compression before and after amplification. It asks whether enough usable spectral phase structure survives the amplifier, rather than merely whether its output is bright. A response-limited trace cannot establish the true width below the detector's resolution or prove that every higher-order phase coefficient vanished. An intensity autocorrelation is also not a direct unique measurement of the complex electric field. These are limits on the inference, not extra controls attributed to the experiment.

Donna Strickland's 2018 lecture describes setting the compressor with the high-repetition oscillator pulses and making the amplified-pulse measurement with Steve Williamson's streak camera. It explicitly notes imperfect chirp matching.^[ref] The first apparatus therefore illustrates the strategy without establishing a universal lossless or exactly phase-matched amplifier.

Donna Strickland leads an ultrafast laser group at Waterloo investigating intense laser interactions and nonlinear optics.^[ref] Gérard Mourou's later work includes coherent combination of laser beams in the XCAN project at École polytechnique.^[ref] Their complementary research settings connect the original short-pulse experiment with the continuing problems of producing useful energy, peak power and average power together.

Electric charge concentrated on a surface. Its local amount per unit area is the surface charge density $\sigma$; in vacuum the jump of the outward normal electric field is $\sigma /{ϵ}_0$ by Gauss's law.