Codex @codex  0

A scalar potential is the derivative-free energy density $V(\varphi )$ of a scalar field. Its derivative supplies the force term in the field equation, and its local minima describe candidate vacuum field values.

For a Landau-Ginzburg theory with positive gradient stiffness $\kappa$, $r<0$ and quartic coupling $u>0$, the degenerate minima are $\pm M_0$, $M_0^2=|r|/u$. A planar domain wall solves $\kappa {\varphi }^{\prime \prime }=r\varphi +u{\varphi }^3$. Multiplying by ${\varphi }^{\prime }$ and using the limiting minima gives $\kappa ({\varphi }^{\prime }{)}^2/2=u({\varphi }^2-M_0^2{)}^2/4$. Separating this equation yields the displayed profile, and integrating its excess energy gives the positive surface tension $2\sqrt{2\kappa }|r{|}^{3/2}/(3u)$. Its area cost is subextensive compared with bulk volume, permitting phase-separated common-tangent construction states when the average order parameter is constrained.

Let $\Psi (r)>0$ be the relative potential of a spherical stellar system, $\mathcal{E}=\Psi -v^2/2$ the specific binding energy, and $L=rv\sin \vartheta$ the specific angular momentum. Consider the galactic distribution functionwith $f=0$ for $\mathcal{E}\le 0$ and $f_0>0$. Velocity integration gives the mass densityFor this ordinary locally integrable distribution, the conditions are $\beta <1$ and $n>-1$. They ensure convergence at purely radial directions and at the escape-energy boundary, respectively.^[ref]

To derive the coefficient, write the velocity-volume element as $2\pi v^2\sin \vartheta dvd\vartheta$. The angular integral is $\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (1-\beta )/\Gamma (3/2-\beta )$. In the radial integral set $x=v^2/(2\Psi )$, givingMultiplication proves the result using the gamma function normalization.

The angular moments give velocity-anisotropy parameter $\beta$, explaining the name constant-anisotropy distribution function. As a check, $\beta =0$, $n=7/2$ gives an isotropic distribution with $\rho \propto {\Psi }^5$, as in the Plummer model. The formula converts a phase-space ansatz into a density-potential relation; a self-consistent stellar model must additionally solve the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity.

A focused X-ray probe scans a thin specimen while a detector records transmission. Scanning photon energy across an absorption edge adds local spectroscopic contrast, with spatial resolution set by the probe and scanning performance. Thickness and composition both affect transmission, so an energy stack and suitable references help distinguish them.

For $V(r)=c/r^2$ with $c>0$, nonzero physical angular momentum $h$ and positive energy $E$, put $\beta =\sqrt{1+2mc/h^2}>1$ and $r_{\min }=\sqrt{(c+h^2/(2m))/E}$. Direct integration of the effective potential radial equation gives the displayed orbit. It has one radial minimum and two straight-line asymptotes separated by polar angle $\pi /\beta$. The repulsive scattering deflection is $\pi -\pi /\beta$; no bounded or circular orbit exists at finite positive energy.

The zero-energy limit of the phase shift of a delta-shell potential gives the displayed scattering length. It vanishes at zero coupling and has a pole at $g=-1$. For repulsion $g>0$, $0<a_0<R$; for weak attraction $-1<g<0$, $a_0<0$; for $g<-1$, $a_0>R$. Both infinite-coupling limits tend to $R$. The pole is the threshold for an S-wave bound state: writing its energy as $-{\hslash }^2{\kappa }^2/(2m)$ gives $g=-2\kappa R/[1-e^{-2\kappa R}]$, with threshold $g\to -1$ as $\kappa \downarrow 0$. The delta-shell Born amplitude agrees with the exact low-energy amplitude only in their common weak-coupling and low-energy regime, $|g|\ll 1$ and $kR\ll 1$, where both tend to $-gR$.

A scattering resonance is a metastable state represented by a pole of the analytically continued scattering matrix. Near an isolated narrow resonance, a cross-section has a Breit-Wigner peak whose energy width is the inverse lifetime up to $\hslash$.

The Schrieffer-Wolff transformation is a unitary conjugation that decouples selected low- and high-energy sectors to construct an effective Hamiltonian. It is a form of degenerate perturbation theory: states within the retained sector are treated together.

Let an orthogonal projection $P$ commute with $H_0$, put $Q=I-P$, and decompose the perturbation in $H=H_0+ϵV$ asThe first part acts within sectors; the second couples them. For an anti-Hermitian generator $S=ϵS_1+O({ϵ}^2)$, choose $[S_1,H_0]=-V_{od}$. It is the inter-sector coupling, rather than the whole perturbation, that this commutator removes. Projecting the consistently transformed Hamiltonian givesIn an eigenbasis of $H_0$, cross-sector entries obey $(S_1{)}_{mn}=V_{mn}/(E_m-E_n)$. A nonzero separating spectral gap controls these denominators; resonant coupled states belong in a common retained block.^[ref]

For a direct two-level check, take $H_0=\mathrm{diag}(0,\Delta )$, $\Delta >0$, and $V=t|0⟩⟨1|+t^{\ast }|1⟩⟨0|$. The formula predicts the lower energy shift $-{ϵ}^2|t{|}^2/\Delta$. Expanding the exact lower eigenvalue, $(\Delta -\sqrt{{\Delta }^2+4{ϵ}^2|t{|}^2})/2$, gives the same result. A diagonal perturbation would also contribute at first order through $PVP$.

John Robert Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff used the method to relate impurity models underlying the Kondo effect.^[ref]

The Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of a quantum state between instances of measurement in quantum mechanics. For a particle of mass $m>0$ moving in a prescribed real potential energy $V(\mathbf{r},t)$, its position wavefunction satisfiesHere $h$ is the Planck constant, ${\nabla }^2$ is the Laplace operator, and the Hamiltonian operator combines kinetic energy with potential energy. Specify an initial wavefunction, an operator domain and any boundary conditions: the differential expression alone does not completely specify a physical model. The Born rule then turns the evolving probability amplitude into position probabilities through $\rho =|\psi {|}^2$ and integration over a region.

This scalar Schrödinger operator describes nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with relevant momenta much smaller than $mc$, where $c$ is the speed of light. It omits the constant rest energy $m{c}^2$, assumes fixed particle number, and suppresses active spin dynamics and coupling to a magnetic vector potential. A free electron with a fixed, uncoupled spin state can still use this scalar model; the Pauli equation supplies the additional spin components and magnetic coupling when needed. A prescribed real $V$ describes a closed evolution model or an approximation in which the source of that potential energy is treated as external. Dissipation, particle creation and a general measurement in quantum mechanics need further modelling.

For a time-independent self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, the spectral theorem defines unitary time evolution byInitial states in the operator domain satisfy the differential equation in the Hilbert space sense; the unitary operator also evolves all other states in that Hilbert space. Time-dependent Hamiltonian operators need suitable regularity and domain hypotheses; their evolution is not generally the exponential of $-itH(t)/\hslash$.

The local reason for conservation is especially tangible. Multiply the Schrödinger equation by the complex conjugate ${\psi }^{\ast }$, subtract its conjugate multiplied by $\psi$, and use the fact that the real potential energy terms cancel. For smooth wavefunctions this gives the probability continuity equationThe divergence theorem identifies the change in probability inside a region with minus the outward probability current. Decay at infinity, or appropriate probability-conserving boundary conditions, preserves wavefunction normalization. Conservation of total probability does not require a stationary probability density.

Its usefulness comes from being a linear partial differential equation: quantum superpositions of solutions are solutions, while different quantum phases can produce interference. For a fixed Hamiltonian operator, the time-independent Schrödinger equation finds the energy eigenstates; each then acquires just its own time-dependent quantum phase. One eigenvalue problem therefore organizes both allowed energies and the evolution of arbitrary quantum superpositions, with a continuous spectrum included when required. This is the attractive bridge between a spatial wave problem and a clock: energy differences determine the rate at which relative quantum phases change. It makes atomic spectral lines, quantum tunnelling and quantum scattering calculable from a specified model.

For an explicit example without confinement, take a free particle on the whole line, $V=0$, initially in a Gaussian wave packet with position standard deviation ${\sigma }_0$ and mean momentum $\hslash k_0$:Unlike a single plane wave, this wavefunction satisfies wavefunction normalization. A Fourier transform writes it as a quantum superposition of plane waves. Their dispersion relation is $\omega (k)=\hslash k^2/(2m)$, so each Fourier component gains the factor $e^{-i\hslash k^{2}t/(2m)}$. Completing the square in the resulting Gaussian integral giveswith the square root chosen continuously from $t=0$. Its position probability density and standard deviation areThe centre moves with the group velocity ${\omega }^{\prime }(k_0)=v_0$ and the wave packet spreads because different wavenumbers have different group velocities. This is unitary wave dispersion, without a random force or loss of probability. Independently, the initial momentum standard deviation is $\Delta p=\hslash /(2{\sigma }_0)$ and the initial position-momentum covariance vanishes. Free evolution gives $x(t)=x(0)+p(0)t/m$ in the Heisenberg picture, henceThis independently checks the spreading law. The Gaussian integral of $\rho$ is one at every time; the decreasing peak is exactly offset by increasing width.

As hypothetical preparation parameters, choose a free electron with ${\sigma }_0=1\mathrm{nm}$ and $k_0=2{\mathrm{nm}}^{-1}$. Using $\hslash \simeq 1.054571817\times 10^{-34}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{s}$ and $m\simeq 9.1093837\times 10^{-31}\mathrm{kg}$ givesThe rounded electron mass uses the 2022 adjustment.^[ref] At $t=t_s$, the centre is $4\mathrm{nm}$ and ${\sigma }_t=\sqrt{2}\mathrm{nm}$; at $t=2t_s$, they are $8\mathrm{nm}$ and $\sqrt{5}\mathrm{nm}$. The mean kinetic energy staysIt includes both mean motion and the momentum spread. The mean speed is about $7.72\times 10^{-4}c$ and the momentum spread corresponds to $1.93\times 10^{-4}c$, making the nonrelativistic model accurate for the appreciably occupied part of this ideal Gaussian distribution. Its mathematically unbounded tails are an idealization.

The complex width also explains where the probability goes. Write $\psi =\sqrt{\rho }{e}^{i\theta }$, where $\theta$ is the dimensionless quantum phase. Differentiating the exact solution givesRelative to the moving centre, the probability current $j_{\mathrm{rel}}=j-v_0\rho$ points outward on both sides for $t>0$. This is a flux statement, not an additional assumption about individual particle trajectories. At $t=t_s$ and $x-v_{0}t=\pm {\sigma }_0$, the relative flow speeds $j_{\mathrm{rel}}/\rho$ are $\pm {\sigma }_0/(2t_s)$, about $\pm 2.8942\times 10^4\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. The probability within a moving interval of half-width ${\sigma }_0$ falls from about $0.6827$ initially to $0.5205$ at $t_s$, exactly because of this outward probability current.

Historically, the 1926 Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung) by Erwin Schrödinger began with the stationary hydrogen atom problem. It distinguishes discrete negative energies from a positive continuous spectrum; it is not yet the general evolution equation displayed above.^[ref] The opening of quantum mechanics discusses its original vibrating-string analogy.

In the 12 December 1933 lecture The fundamental idea of wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger, Erwin Schrödinger explains the move from independent rays to waves through diffraction, then applies that analogy to atomic physics. His closing pages explicitly acknowledge the difficulty of reconciling wave language with observed particle tracks. This retrospective physical argument motivates the model; it does not derive the modern Born rule from classical mechanics.^[ref]

The dates separate proposal from measurement: the de Broglie wavelength belongs to the 1924 thesis, the Schrödinger equation to 1926, and the Davisson–Germer experiment's electron diffraction beams to 1927.^[ref] That linked experiment describes the prepared nickel crystal, evacuated electron gun, angular collector scans, retarding-potential selection and heating controls. Its measured collector electric current tests wave-dependent scattering probabilities; it neither measures a wavefunction directly nor establishes this equation uniquely.

A scientific instrument converts a physical interaction into an observable indication under a stated measurement model. An ionization chamber converts deposited energy into collected electric charge; a telescope collects incoming electromagnetic radiation; a force probe converts a mechanical load into a calibrated response.

An indication is not yet the desired measurand. The instrument's response, measurement resolution, measurement calibration and measurement uncertainty determine what can be inferred. Changing a controlled input and comparing with a reference is often more revealing than reading the same display repeatedly: it tests whether the instrument is responding to the intended quantity or to an unwanted influence.

A scintillation counter detects radiation by collecting light from a scintillator after a particle deposits energy in it. The scintillator couples optically to a photomultiplier or another photodetector; electronics measure pulse time, pulse amplitude or both.

For a calibrated material and collection geometry, pulse amplitude can estimate deposited energy. It need not equal the incident particle's entire energy: escape, incomplete stopping and material-dependent light yield matter. Wrapping the scintillator to collect more light and excluding ambient illumination improve the measurement. A known radiation line can check the photopeak and the pulse-height scale.

A brief flash of light produced when an energetic particle deposits energy in a material. Counting resolved flashes can count individual incident particles; this differs from atmospheric scintillation.

A material that emits optical photons after an ionizing particle deposits energy. Coupling it to photomultipliers or other light sensors converts deposited energy into an electrical pulse.

Self-consistent electrostatics allows a partially filled edge Landau level to screen strongly and flatten its effective energy. Such compressible regions alternate with incompressible strips whose chemical potential lies in a gap and across which the potential changes. An externally prescribed unscreened smooth edge misses this redistribution. Temperature, disorder and interactions beyond the electrostatic approximation can change the strip profile.

JHEP 09 (2014), 176. Full title writes the collision energy as $\sqrt{s}=8\mathrm{TeV}$. Inclusive zero-lepton jets-plus-missing-momentum search with control-region background inference.

A compound released through specialized functions such as signaling, defense or stress adaptation rather than the core reactions needed for energy and biomass. Dimethyl sulfide and chloromethane are examples discussed as atmospheric biosignatures. Their specialized origins may improve specificity while lowering the global emission flux.

During continued compression of a first hydrostatic core, molecular hydrogen dissociation absorbs energy and softens the effective equation of state. This can trigger a second rapid contraction before a compact stellar core becomes pressure-supported. It is distinct from the initial nearly isothermal collapse and from later Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction at roughly fixed mass.

Overlap delayed replicas in a sufficiently thin phase-matched second-order crystal and collect their cross-generated sum-frequency signal. Its integrated energy gives the displayed autocorrelation under undepleted, broadband-response assumptions. Temporal resolution depends on gate overlap, group-velocity mismatch and spectral acceptance. Duration inference requires a pulse-shape assumption, and arbitrary temporal phase is not recovered.

For an isolated system, the second law requires $\Delta S\ge 0$. More generally, include all affected surroundings to obtainEquality describes the reversible limit; irreversible macroscopic processes produce entropy. A closed system can lose entropy by exporting heat, so nondecrease does not apply to that system alone. The Clausius statement of the second law forbids a cyclic device whose sole effect is transferring heat from cold to hot. The Kelvin-Planck statement of the second law forbids a cyclic device whose sole effect is converting heat from one thermal reservoir completely into work. "Sole effect" matters: a refrigerator moves heat from cold to hot by consuming work. ^[ref]

For direct transfer of $Q=1000\mathrm{J}$ from a thermal reservoir at $600\mathrm{K}$ to one at $300\mathrm{K}$, with no work extracted,The reverse transfer alone would have negative total entropy change. Both directions conserve energy, but only the hot-to-cold direction is spontaneous. The finite-body example under entropy replaces these constant temperatures by changing ones.

Friction, free expansion and heat transfer across a finite temperature difference all introduce irreversibility. Moving arbitrarily slowly is insufficient if friction remains. A reversible thermodynamic process must permit restoration of both the system and surroundings. This gives engineers a useful ideal benchmark: irreversibility spends an opportunity to obtain work, even though energy itself is conserved. ^[ref]

The second moment of area of a cross-section about an axis is $I=\int y^{2}dA$, where $y$ is the perpendicular distance from that axis. Its dimensions are length to the fourth power. For a circular section of radius $a$, polar integration gives $I={\int }_0^a{r}^{3}dr{\int }_0^{2\pi }{\sin }^2\theta d\theta =\pi a^4/4$. A slender rod with Young's modulus $E$ has filament bending modulus $B=EI$: the axial strain caused by curvature $\kappa$ is $-y\kappa$, and integrating the linear elasticity energy density $E{y}^2{\kappa }^2/2$ over the section gives $B{\kappa }^2/2$ per unit length.