Triple point Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
A triple point is a temperature–pressure pair at which three distinct bulk thermodynamic phases of a one-component substance coexist in thermodynamic equilibrium. In the familiar solid–liquid–gas case, their three phase coexistence curves meet. Other combinations, such as two crystal polymorphs and a liquid, also qualify: “triple” counts thermodynamic phases, rather than states-of-matter categories.
For the same substance, the chemical potential in each thermodynamic phase must agree:
There are two independent equality conditions for two controls, temperature and pressure. Generically they select an isolated pair ; the third pairwise equality follows from the first two. Equivalently, the phase rule gives . This counts independent intensive controls, not phase fractions: changing the amounts of the three thermodynamic phases need not change the ideal bulk temperature and pressure, provided all three remain present. Different sets of crystal polymorphs can give different triple points for the same substance.[ref]
At a liquid-gas critical point, the two fluid thermodynamic phases instead merge, and their mass density difference and latent heat vanish. It is the endpoint of the liquid–gas phase coexistence curve, rather than a meeting of three distinct thermodynamic phases. The regular independent-equality count used for a triple point cannot explain this merger. A triple point can retain finite mass density and entropy differences between all three thermodynamic phases.[ref]
Take a closed system consisting of one mole of a classical monatomic gas, idealized as an ideal gas with constant heat capacity at constant volume . Stipulate amount of substance and molar gas constant for this calculation. Set initial temperature and volume , and define and . The specified equilibrium endpoints are
Thus has volume , temperature and pressure . The fixed material inventory and ideal gas law make these complete endpoint specifications for this model. All numbers below are calculated values, rather than measurements of a particular gas.
Use a frictionless piston, ignore bulk mechanical energy changes, and allow only pressure-volume work. Each step is the limit of a reversible thermodynamic process: adjust loads by infinitesimal pressure differences, and supply heat through infinitesimal temperature differences. Heating with changing temperature requires a succession of matching thermal reservoirs; contact with a single hotter heat bath would give an irreversible finite difference. On a fixed-volume leg the piston is locked. These assumptions justify using the actual equilibrium path's pressure in
An endpoint chord is not the path; substituting a guessed straight line would compute a different thermodynamic process.[ref]
The upper route heats at fixed volume from to , then undergoes isothermal expansion at to . The lower route undergoes isothermal expansion at from to , then heats at fixed volume to . The tuples use the same ordering as the endpoints. Vertical legs do zero expansion work, and the two curved legs have different pressures at every shared intermediate volume.
Figure 1.
Two reversible ideal gas paths connect the same equilibrium endpoints
. Original idealized pressure-volume diagram. The upper route is and the lower route is ; the shaded gap is the difference in work, not an experimental uncertainty. Both are reversible thermodynamic processes under the stated piston and thermal reservoir assumptions. Details.
The internal energy of an ideal gas gives the same endpoint difference for both routes:
On either fixed-volume heating leg, and . On each isothermal expansion, , so the first law of thermodynamics gives . The ideal gas law and the integral of then give
Here is the natural logarithm. Rounded to , the upper route has and the lower route has . Subtracting separately rounded entries can differ by ; the unrounded balances are exact in the stipulated model.
Figure 2.
Different heat and work transfers leave the same internal energy increment
. Original calculated energy ledger for the two reversible paths. Each incoming heat bar is divided into outgoing work and the common stored increment . Labels are rounded; bar lengths use unrounded values. These are process totals, not inventories of stored heat or stored work. Details.
The shaded area between the curves explains the entire difference:
Following the upper route forward and the lower route backward makes a thermodynamic cycle with this positive net work and matching net heat. Its internal energy change is zero. The two open routes themselves are reversible, so their different work outputs should not be mistaken for a loss caused by entropy production: they receive different heat transfers at different temperatures.
Two other state functions provide independent endpoint checks. With enthalpy in this model,
To obtain the entropy change along either route, integrate on its heating leg, giving , and on its isothermal expansion, giving . Reordering the legs changes their heat totals but leaves the sum of their entropy changes unchanged. In particular, neither route's total divided by its final temperature equals , and neither total equals : both routes include an isothermal expansion, rather than a single fixed-pressure heating step.
Type I migration 2026-10-20
Orbital migration of a low-mass embedded planet driven by its interaction with disk gas, without a deep gap. Spiral wave torques and corotation-region torques exchange orbital angular momentum. The sign depends on the disk gradients and thermodynamics; this regime is not restricted to inward migration.
A U-tube differential manometer contains a connected column of liquid with one gas connection above each liquid meniscus. Write for the left and right pressures, and for the meniscus heights on an upward vertical coordinate. Assume constant mass density and downward gravitational acceleration of magnitude ; neglect the gas column's mass density and differences in capillary pressure. The signed vertical length difference then gives
Larger left pressure means a lower left liquid meniscus: implies . Equal pressures give equal meniscus heights.
Figure 1. . Original schematic of two same-height pressure tappings connected to a resting water column. The constructed example uses and , so the vertical difference is . Dashed lines mark both meniscus heights and the equal-pressure datum; the dotted bottom line identifies two equal-height points within the connected liquid. The arrow in the pipe indicates fluid flow; the manometer liquid has no continuing flow at equilibrium. Details.
The balance follows directly from hydrostatic pressure. At a common height below both surfaces, the two points in the connected homogeneous liquid have equal pressure:
Subtracting cancels the common bottom depth and leaves . The same-height rule follows from hydrostatic equilibrium, : a horizontal displacement changes no pressure, and for constant the quantity is constant throughout the connected liquid. Equal height alone is insufficient for unrelated vessels or for fluid flow with significant acceleration.
For an original constructed example, choose water of stipulated mass density , gravitational acceleration , and vertical length difference . Then
The SI pressure unit is the pascal: the product has units . Swapping the two connections gives and reverses which liquid meniscus is lower. In equal-bore arms, volume conservation makes each surface move from its initial equal-height position; using only one surface's displacement would halve the inferred pressure. With unequal arm areas , a left fall and right rise instead obey , while the vertical length difference is still .
If the right port is open to the local atmosphere, is the left gauge pressure. Only with that reference and known atmospheric pressure can one obtain absolute pressure from
For an explicitly stipulated atmospheric pressure of , the example gives absolute pressure. If the right port is connected to another vessel or a pressure tapping, the same reading is a differential pressure and supplies no absolute pressure without knowing that reference.[ref]
Van der Waals equation Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-14
The Van der Waals equation is a simple real gas equation of state that can also describe a liquid-gas critical point. With particle count fixed, write the volume per particle as :
or equivalently . Here is pressure, is absolute temperature, and is the Boltzmann constant. In SI, and have units per particle, has units , and has units ; the particle count is dimensionless. The pole at excludes smaller volume values from this model.
The correction represents excluded volume; the attraction term lowers pressure at fixed temperature and particle number density . This is a mean-field theory, replacing detailed intermolecular structure by two parameters. At with , it approaches the ideal gas law . It supplies a useful qualitative route from a dilute gas to phase coexistence, without a claim of quantitative accuracy for every fluid.[ref]
Do not mix this particle convention with the molar volume convention elsewhere in this article. With amount of substance , Avogadro constant , and molar gas constant , one has , , and , so . The molar parameters have units and , respectively.
Johannes Diderik van der Waals introduced this equation of state in 1873, connecting molecular attraction with departures from the dilute ideal gas law. Its historical significance is the unified treatment of gases and liquids, rather than a universally exact fit.[ref]
Van der Waals liquid-gas coexistence Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
Below , the equilibrium liquid and gas have the same temperature, pressure , and per-particle chemical potential. For macroscopic bulk thermodynamic phases, neglect interface contributions. The Maxwell equal-area construction determines and by
It expresses equality of chemical potentials, since at fixed temperature. Equivalently, the equilibrium Helmholtz free energy per particle follows a common tangent line between the two endpoint states, lying below the homogeneous continuation between them. The construction uses that mathematical continuation to compare endpoints; it is not a physical compression path through negative isothermal compressibility states.[ref]
Here is a reproducible calculated example at . With , the homogeneous intersections solve the cubic equation
The Maxwell construction gives
All three roots of a polynomial satisfy . Only the smallest and largest are the phase coexistence endpoints; the middle one has negative isothermal compressibility. Equal pressures at three admissible values of volume therefore do not imply three stable thermodynamic phases. An analytic area check is
At full numerical precision, the residual is below in reduced units; independent numerical integration gives the same cancellation. At , the spinodal points are instead and .
Figure 1. . The horizontal coordinate is reduced number density , not molar volume. The green region is equilibrium liquid–gas coexistence, bounded by the binodal. Hatching marks unstable homogeneous states, and the strips between solid and dashed boundaries mark homogeneous metastability. This is a model phase diagram, not measured data. Details.
The equilibrium plateau changes the phase fraction rather than the endpoint densities. For a gas particle fraction and mean particle volume , the lever rule reads
Thus at gives : this is a particle fraction, not the volume fraction occupied by gas. Differentiating equality of chemical potentials along this model's phase coexistence curve yields the same Clapeyron equation explained below, , with latent heat per particle. Both endpoint differences vanish as the Van der Waals critical point is approached; the equation's critical limit must be taken as a ratio.
The Maxwell construction presumes a pure bulk fluid at thermodynamic equilibrium. Its endpoint equality does not specify how rapidly a real compression reaches equilibrium. A homogeneous metastable sample can persist while nucleation is delayed; the spinodal marks loss of local mechanical stability in this mean-field theory, rather than the equilibrium onset of condensation. Surface tension, finite sample size and impurities can affect the observed transition. These qualifications matter when comparing a mathematical Van der Waals isotherm with a visible liquid meniscus.
Vapor Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-31
Vapor-compression refrigeration Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
Vapor-compression refrigeration circulates a working fluid through cold and hot coils. In the cold coil, liquid becomes gas while absorbing heat from the refrigerated region. Compression supplies work and raises the pressure and temperature; the hot coil releases heat as the gas returns to liquid. A restriction reduces the pressure before the next cold-side passage. Changing the pressure changes the temperature of the phase transition, letting one circulating fluid receive and release heat at different temperatures. This physical implementation serves both refrigerators and heat pumps; its ordinary dissipative operation differs from the reversible Carnot cycle used to bound performance. [ref] [ref]
Vapor density 2026-10-31
The density of a vapor relative to a specified reference gas at the same temperature and pressure.
Vaporization 2026-10-18
Vaporization changes a liquid into a gas. It includes evaporation at a surface and boiling within the liquid. Below the liquid-gas critical point, equilibrium conversion along the liquid-vapour phase coexistence curve involves latent heat; the liquid and vapour have equal chemical potential there.
Vapor pressure 2026-10-14
The equilibrium pressure of a vapor in contact with its liquid or solid at a specified temperature. For pure liquid–gas phase coexistence with negligible interface effects, it is the pressure on their phase coexistence curve. In a gas mixture, distinguish the component's partial pressure from the total pressure; the pure-substance Integrated Clausius-Clapeyron relation does not describe the total pressure of arbitrary humid air.
Virial criterion for Joule-Thomson cooling Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
For , the coefficient is . On the stable dilute branch it is positive precisely when .
Virial expansion Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-13
The virial expansion describes the first departures from the ideal gas law as a power series in number density. For a homogeneous, single-species gas in three dimensions at thermal equilibrium, write , with the volume, and define the dimensionless compressibility factor by
Here is absolute pressure, is absolute thermodynamic temperature, and is the Boltzmann constant. The second virial coefficient determines the initial slope away from ; higher coefficients describe further corrections. The symbol here is an equation of state ratio, not a canonical partition function. [ref]
Figure 1.
Controlled gas expansion and extraction of a dilute-gas slope: schematic apparatus and explicitly chosen toy curves
. Details.
The left panel sketches the measurement principle; the right panel uses deliberately chosen polynomials, with and , where is a reference length. These curves are not measured data. Their initial slopes have opposite signs, but both bend because of the quadratic term. Using a finite secant from to gives , rather than : reducing the fitting range reduces this particular truncation bias. This algebra explains why measuring one nonideal pressure is insufficient to extract a reliable second virial coefficient.
Waxman and Hastings's 1971 Burnett experiment used sample and expansion chambers in a thermostatic bath, with a valve between them and a pressure transducer linked to a piston gauge. They measured successive isothermal expansions: evacuate the expansion chamber, open the valve, record the equilibrated pressure, isolate and evacuate that chamber again, then repeat. This avoids separately measuring the absolute gas amount and chamber volumes. For carbon dioxide at , their measurements below bar gave a molar second virial coefficient of approximately . [ref]
An idealized reduction makes the signal explicit. Let be the calibrated chamber volume ratio, the pre-expansion pressure, and the post-expansion pressure. Particle conservation during one valve opening gives . At the same temperature, division of the two equations of state yields
Thus the intercept determines , while the dilute-limit slope determines the second virial coefficient. In the actual experiment, helium runs calibrated the cell constant and chamber deformation corrections were included. Agreement of the carbon dioxide low-pressure intercept with the helium calibration, and the absence of an anomalous low-pressure upturn, checked for gas adsorption on chamber walls. [ref]
For a limited dilute-gas fit, hold temperature fixed, allow thermal equilibrium after every expansion, calibrate absolute pressure and the chamber ratio, and check leaks and sample composition. Repeat the analysis with a smaller upper pressure cutoff and an added curvature term; compare the resulting second virial coefficients with their uncertainties. Too wide a range mixes in higher coefficients; too narrow a range makes the nonideal signal hard to distinguish from instrument error. The displayed chamber equation neglects deformation, dead spaces and adsorption, so it is a teaching reduction rather than the complete experimental analysis.
Units matter. With number density in , has units and has units . For molar density in , the same equation of state is
Here is the Avogadro constant and is the molar gas constant; the molar coefficients have units and . A coefficient tabulated per mole must therefore multiply molar density, not number density.
For the classical formulas below, use a nondegenerate gas with thermal de Broglie wavelength satisfying , negligible quantum corrections to relative motion, and a stable, sufficiently short-ranged pair potential. Diluteness must also control the omitted interaction terms: alone is not enough when positive and negative contributions cancel. A finite truncation is a local low-number density approximation, not an equation of state for a dense liquid or across a phase transition. [ref] [ref]
NASA's Wind Tunnel Experiment Details, slide 27, describes a practical manometer measurement: partially fill a Tygon tube with water and connect its two ends to total pressure and static pressure ports in a wind tunnel. The total pressure connection pushes its liquid meniscus downward; the vertical length difference supplies the pressure difference. The slide predicts increasing separation as the tunnel speed increases. It supplies an apparatus and method, rather than a table of observed readings.[ref]
A control for this practical is to expose both connections to the same atmospheric pressure before the run: settled liquid meniscus heights should agree in a symmetric column. Read each liquid meniscus at eye level, reconnect sealed tubing to the identified ports, and wait for settling. Recheck the equal-pressure zero afterwards; reverse connections to check the sign. These checks establish neither mass density nor ruler accuracy.[ref]
The inference is a differential pressure from hydrostatic pressure, with stagnation pressure on one side and static pressure on the other in NASA's practical. Converting that difference to a flow speed additionally needs the hypotheses discussed under dynamic pressure and Pitot-static tube. A changing pressure can leave the column oscillating; leaks, blocked pressure tappings or trapped liquid in a gas connection can alter or delay the readout. The column should be read after settling, and temperature should be recorded when choosing the measuring liquid's mass density.
Two corrections clarify the limits. If both gas ports are at the same height and carry the same gas of constant mass density , keeping its hydrostatic pressure gives . Different port heights require their separate gas column heights. Also, a curved liquid meniscus can sustain a capillary pressure jump through surface tension. Write for liquid pressure minus gas pressure at the two surfaces. Neglecting gas weight, the balance becomes . Identical meniscus shapes in matching clean bores cancel those jumps; unequal bores or different wetting conditions need not. Thus the useful simplicity of rests on identifiable physical conditions.
Wind-fed black-hole binary Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-10-25
A binary in which a black hole captures part of its companion's stellar wind. The captured gas can dissipate energy and, with sufficient specific angular momentum, form an accretion disk. This differs from gas overflowing a Roche lobe through the inner Lagrange point. The fraction captured, its angular momentum and changes in the wind affect the accretion flow and emitted X-rays.
X-ray Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
X-rays are high-frequency electromagnetic radiation, conventionally with wavelengths of roughly to . The precise wavelength convention varies with context. Hot accreting gas and energetic electronic processes can emit X-rays, whose short wavelengths make them useful probes of compact objects and electron shells.
For a photon, , where is the Planck constant and is the speed of light. As a calculated example, gives , using . The same wavelength can describe different production mechanisms: bremsstrahlung produces a continuous frequency spectrum, whereas Characteristic X-rays arise from discrete electronic changes in chemical atoms. Measuring transmitted X-rays gives radiography; measuring their frequency spectrum gives spectroscopy.
Young–Laplace equation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The Young–Laplace equation relates the pressure jump across a stationary interface to its curvature and surface tension. Choose a unit normal vector pointing from the inside region to the outside region, and define to be positive for a convex sphere. In mechanical equilibrium, with constant surface tension and no additional normal viscous stresses,
Here are the signed principal curvatures in this convention. Their sum is twice the corresponding signed mean curvature; stating the convention prevents a factor-of-two ambiguity. The Young–Laplace equation is a local normal stress balance for one interface. [ref]
A spherical liquid droplet of radius in a gas has one interface, with . An ideal thin soap bubble has two liquid–gas interfaces. Adding their pressure jumps gives
For the soap bubble, now means the inner gas pressure minus the outer gas pressure. The second formula assumes equal surface tensions on both faces and film thickness negligible relative to , so their radii can be identified. Retaining distinct radii gives . A gas bubble inside bulk liquid has only one interface and therefore uses . [ref]
With the assumed constant toy surface tension , a droplet with has excess pressure ; at it has . A thin soap bubble assigned the same and has excess pressure . These are differences from the surrounding pressure, rather than absolute pressures. Halving the radius doubles the capillary pressure; doubling the interface count also doubles it at fixed radius and surface tension.
Figure 1.
Smaller droplets need larger excess pressure; two bubble interfaces double it
. Left: a virtual outward displacement of a sphere balances pressure work against increased surface energy. Right: excess pressure in pascals versus positive radius in millimetres for one and two interfaces, using the assumed constant toy . Details.
The spherical case has a short work argument. A virtual increase in radius gives and . At mechanical equilibrium, the net pressure work balances the increase in surface energy:
For a thin soap bubble, both interfaces gain approximately the same surface area, doubling the right-hand side and giving . This is a virtual work balance between neighboring spherical configurations, rather than an assumption that a fixed-volume droplet actually expands. The general Young–Laplace equation replaces the spherical area-to-volume ratio by local curvature, making geometry directly measurable through pressure.