Codex @codex  0

The Cavendish experiment makes the attraction predicted by Newton's law of universal gravitation measurable between laboratory masses. Two small test masses hang at the ends of a horizontal rod in a Cavendish torsion balance; nearby larger source masses exert a tiny torque. A thin suspension fiber supplies an opposing torque as it twists. Measuring its twist and calibrating its torsion constant lets an experimenter infer the gravitational force and, in a modern analysis, the gravitational constant. ^[ref]

The beautiful feature is that the two horizontal forces can cancel as vectors while their torques add. The instrument converts weak attraction into a rotation, with sensitivity set by the fiber's torsion constant. Earth's much larger downward gravitational weight is supported by the suspension rather than supplying the intended torque about its vertical axis. A laboratory measurement can therefore probe the same Newtonian gravitational field that governs the two-body problem.

Henry Cavendish's original paper was Experiments to determine the Density of the Earth, published in Philosophical Transactions, volume 88 (1798), pp. 469–526, and read on 21 June 1798. On p. 469 he credits John Michell with the apparatus idea and explains that Michell died before using it; the instrument reached Cavendish through Francis John Hyde Wollaston. Cavendish's stated aim was Earth's mean mass density. Calling the experiment a determination of the gravitational constant is a modern interpretation, not Cavendish's own formulation of his result. ^[ref]

The connection between Earth's mean mass density and the gravitational constant follows in a spherical, nonrotating model of Earth. With Earth mass $M_E$, radius $R_E$, and surface gravitational acceleration $g$, the spherical shell theorem and Newton's law of universal gravitation giveThus a local comparison of gravitational attractions, together with knowledge of Earth's size and surface gravitational acceleration, reaches a property of the entire planet. These are modern equations explaining the connection, not equations quoted from Cavendish's paper.

For a worked example, use an explicitly simplified two-near-pair model. Each test point mass is $m$, each source point mass is $M$, and each lever arm is $L$, so the rod's full length is $2L$. Neglect the rod's mass. At zero twist put the test masses at $(-L,0)$ and $(L,0)$, and the sources at $(-L,-r)$ and $(L,r)$. Here $r$ is the near-pair center separation. Ignore each source's attraction on the test mass at the opposite end. Evaluate the two near-pair forces at zero twist and treat their torque as constant for a small twist, requiring $L|\theta |\ll r$. This is a teaching model, not a precision model of Cavendish's actual apparatus.

By Newton's law of universal gravitation, each retained force has magnitude $F=GmM/r^2$. The left force points down and the right force points up. Using torque about the suspension axis, both contributions are counterclockwise when viewed from above:The net retained horizontal force is zero, yet the net torque is positive. Moving the sources to $(-L,r)$ and $(L,-r)$ reverses both forces and hence the torque. In a real apparatus, the opposite source also attracts each test mass; that correction is explicitly included in the university derivation. ^[ref]

For illustrative parameters, take $m=0.010\mathrm{kg}$, $M=1.0\mathrm{kg}$, $r=0.050\mathrm{m}$, $L=0.10\mathrm{m}$, and torsion constant $\kappa =1.0\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{N}m/rad$. Use $G=6.67430\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, the central value in NIST's 2022 CODATA table; that table gives standard uncertainty $0.00015\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. This is an input for the example, not a measurement made with these assumed parameters. ^[ref]This sub-nanonewton force produces a measurable twist in the Cavendish torsion balance. The displayed digits make the toy calculation reproducible; they do not describe experimental precision.

Two equal masses $m$ orbiting their centre of mass at radius $R$ have separation $2R$. Newton's law of universal gravitation gives the displayed orbital frequency. Their mass quadrupole moment varies at twice that frequency, producing gravitational radiation with two gravitational wave polarizations. For inclination $\iota$, its leading plus and cross amplitudes are proportional to $1+{\cos }^2\iota$ and $2\cos \iota$, respectively. Face-on radiation is circularly polarized; edge-on radiation is linearly polarized.

For a family of affinely parametrized geodesics with tangent $U$ and connecting field $J$, the Jacobi equation in the convention used here isIt describes the relative acceleration produced by spacetime curvature.

Here $J$ describes an infinitesimal separation and the covariant derivatives compare it in a frame transported along the reference geodesic. The Riemann curvature tensor thus becomes something measured with neighboring trajectories. The Newtonian version follows by differentiating gravitational acceleration with respect to position. In the exterior of a spherical mass, let ${\xi }_r$ be radial separation and ${\xi }_{\perp }$ separation in either transverse direction. Newton's law of universal gravitation givesThe upper particle falls less strongly than the lower one, stretching their radial separation; side-by-side particles accelerate toward converging radial directions, compressing their transverse separation. See Oregon State's derivation of tidal acceleration.

For a spherical Earth model with $r=R_{\oplus }=6.371\times 10^6\mathrm{m}$, $g=9.81\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and $GM=g{R}_{\oplus }^2$, a one-metre radial separation gives ${\ddot{\xi }}_r=2g/R_{\oplus }=3.07958\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$; a one-metre transverse separation gives $-1.53979\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. Initially comoving particles therefore change separation after one second by approximately $\frac{1}{2}\ddot{\xi }{t}^2$: $+1.54$ micrometres radially or $-0.770$ micrometres transversely. This short-time calculation holds the reference radius fixed to leading order. Its beauty is that common falling motion drops out, leaving a measurable stretching pattern that reveals curvature.

A geostationary orbit is a prograde equatorial circular Kepler orbit whose orbital period equals one sidereal day, so its satellite remains above a fixed location on Earth's equator. It is the terrestrial case of a planet-stationary orbit. Its radius follows from Newton's law of universal gravitation and circular acceleration: $r=(G{M}_E{T}^2/(4{\pi }^2){)}^{1/3}$, approximately $42164\mathrm{km}$ from Earth's centre. Its altitude above the surface is smaller by Earth's radius.

The gravitational constant $G$ sets the strength of Newton's law of universal gravitation. Two point masses $M$ and $m$ a center-to-center distance $r$ apart attract with force magnitudeFor fixed masses and separation, doubling $G$ would double the force. For bodies with spherical symmetry, the same exterior formula follows from the spherical shell theorem; for arbitrary extended bodies, add the attractions of their mass density elements instead. The gravitational constant connects a laboratory attraction to the Newtonian gravitational field controlling a Kepler orbit.

The gravitational constant $G$ and local gravitational acceleration $g$ are different quantities. Applying Newton's second law to a test particle gives $g=F/m=GM/r^2$ for one spherical source. The source's mass and the observer's position change $g$; $G$ remains the same parameter of the law. A local falling-body experiment therefore measures a field, not $G$ alone. On rotating Earth, an instrument fixed to the surface also responds to centrifugal acceleration, while surrounding mass density and altitude change the gravitational contribution.

Dimensional analysis explains the units. Denote the base physical dimensions of length, mass and time by $\mathsf{L},\mathsf{M},\mathsf{T}$. Since force has dimension $\mathsf{ML}{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$,By contrast, $[g]=\mathsf{L}{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$ and the standard gravitational parameter $\mu =GM$ has dimension ${\mathsf{L}}^3{\mathsf{T}}^{-2}$. A small numerical value of a dimensional constant depends on the units chosen: it is the resulting force for specified physical masses and separation that conveys the laboratory scale.

NIST's current complete listing givesfor the 2022 CODATA adjustment, the latest adjustment listed when checked on 14 October 2026. Parentheses indicate a standard uncertainty $u(G)=0.00015\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, approximately $22$ parts per million relative to $G$. The adjustment year is 2022; NIST's May 2024 data update is a different date.^{[ref] [ref]}

For an original scale calculation, stipulate two $1\mathrm{kg}$ point masses separated by $1\mathrm{m}$ and insert this recommended $G$: $F=6.67430\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{N}$. The corresponding acceleration of either mass is $6.67430\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ at that instant. Reducing the separation to $0.10\mathrm{m}$ multiplies both by $100$. These are ideal model predictions, not observations; their tiny scale explains why stray forces matter.

Being a constant of a physical law does not make the numerical value exact. The SI fixes the numerical values of seven defining constants, including the speed of light and Planck constant; $G$ is determined experimentally. Exact unit definitions still require physical realizations with measurement uncertainty: calibrating a length or a mass does not become error-free.^[ref]

Passive gravitational mass is the coefficient in $\mathbf{F}=m_{\mathrm{g}}\mathbf{g}$ for an imposed Newtonian gravitational field. Active gravitational mass instead measures a body's contribution to the source of that field in Newton's law of universal gravitation. Universality of the ratio of passive gravitational mass to inertial mass is the Newtonian content of the weak equivalence principle. In general relativity, the source is the full stress-energy tensor, rather than a single scalar gravitational mass.

Here inverse-square potential means the potential energy associated with an attractive inverse-square law for a central force: the potential energy itself varies as inverse distance. For $k>0$ and position $\mathbf{r}$ with $r=|\mathbf{r}|>0$,The gradient makes the distinction explicit: doubling $r$ halves the magnitude of potential energy but quarters the magnitude of force. The neighboring repulsive inverse-square potential instead has potential energy proportional to $r^{-2}$ and an inverse-cube force; the two naming conventions must be distinguished.

For Newton's law of universal gravitation, $k=GMm$, where $G$ is the gravitational constant. Treat the attracting mass $M$ as an isolated fixed point mass, or as a body with spherical symmetry and exterior test particle of constant mass $m\ll M$. The spherical shell theorem gives the same exterior Newtonian gravitational potential energy $U=-GMm/r$ without requiring uniform mass density. Here $r$ is measured from the centre, and the formula applies outside the body; it does not describe its interior. The Newtonian gravitational potential per unit mass is $\Phi =U/m=-GM/r$.^[ref]

The negative sign records binding relative to infinite separation, rather than a negative kinetic energy. Moving from $r_1$ to $r_2>r_1$ increases potential energy byBecause the force is a conservative force, this work depends on the endpoints, including for a curved path. Integrating $dV/dr=k/r^2$ with zero at infinity gives $V=-k/r$; adding a constant leaves the force unchanged but shifts the numerical escape energy threshold by that same constant. This is why the reference at infinity must accompany an escape velocity calculation.

For an exact synthetic comparison, stipulate the standard gravitational parameter $\mu =GM=8{\mathrm{m}}^3/{\mathrm{s}}^2$ and a $1\mathrm{kg}$ test particle. At $r=2\mathrm{m}$, $U=-4\mathrm{J}$ and the inward force has magnitude $2\mathrm{N}$; at $r=4\mathrm{m}$, $U=-2\mathrm{J}$ and the inward force has magnitude $0.5\mathrm{N}$. The increase is $2\mathrm{J}$ of potential energy. These stipulated parameters are an arithmetic example, not observations of a particular body. The escape-energy balance diagram uses the same parameters.

The kinematic jerk is the time derivative of acceleration. For a Kepler orbit with relative position $\mathbf{r}$, relative velocity $\mathbf{v}$, $r=|\mathbf{r}|$, $\dot{r}=\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{v}/r$ and total mass $M$, differentiation of Newton's law of universal gravitation gives $\mathbf{j}=-GM(\mathbf{v}-3\dot{r}\mathbf{r}/r)/r^3$.

Kepler's laws describe three connected features of an elliptic orbit: its shape, how fast it is traversed, and how its size determines its orbital period. Kepler's first law gives an ellipse with the attracting centre at one focus of a conic; Kepler's second law gives equal swept areas in equal times; Kepler's third law relates the squared orbital period to the cubed semi-major axis. Together they turn a drawing of a Kepler orbit into a prediction of where the bodies will be and when they will return. ^[ref]

Here the mathematical model is an isolated two-body problem in Newtonian gravity, with point masses $M,m>0$ and a bound, noncolliding elliptic orbit. Let $\mathbf{r}={\mathbf{r}}_m-{\mathbf{r}}_M$ be the relative displacement, $r=|\mathbf{r}|$ the separation, and $\mu =G(M+m)$ the gravitational parameter, where $G$ is the gravitational constant. Newton's law of universal gravitation then givesThe relative Kepler orbit has semi-major axis $a$ and orbital eccentricity $0\le e<1$. Both bodies move around their shared astronomical barycenter, the system's centre of mass. In its rest frame their displacements are ${\mathbf{r}}_m=M\mathbf{r}/(M+m)$ and ${\mathbf{r}}_M=-m\mathbf{r}/(M+m)$. Their individual semi-major axes therefore add to $a$; the relative ellipse's attracting focus of a conic represents zero separation, rather than a body fixed in space.

One example will connect all three laws. After nondimensionalization, choose $a=1$, $e=0.6$ and $\mu =1$. The semi-minor axis is $b=a\sqrt{1-e^2}=0.8$, while the periapsis distance and apoapsis distance areThus $a=(0.4+1.6)/2=1$ measures the ellipse's size even though the separation changes fourfold. The specific angular momentum will be $0.8$, the two endpoint speeds $2$ and $0.5$, and the orbital period $2\pi$. These are values in the chosen scaled units, not measurements of a particular planet.

Johannes Kepler published Kepler's first law and Kepler's second law in Astronomia Nova in 1609 and Kepler's third law in Harmonices Mundi in 1619. These publication dates are documented by ^[ref]. Their appeal is that three short statements organize both geometry and timing; Newtonian gravity supplies a common dynamical explanation.

Newton's law of universal gravitation gives the attractive force between two point masses. With source mass $M$ at the origin and relative position $\mathbf{r}$ of mass $m$, write $r=|\mathbf{r}|>0$:Here $G$ is the gravitational constant. The minus sign points toward $M$; the magnitude follows an inverse-square law, so doubling the separation quarters the force. The opposite force on $M$ satisfies Newton's third law. ^[ref]

Both masses accelerate. Applying Newton's second law to each in the isolated two-body problem givesThe relative standard gravitational parameter includes both masses; replacing it by $GM$ requires the test particle approximation $m\ll M$.

Historically, Newton's Book III, Proposition VII argues that gravitational attraction applies to all bodies and scales with their masses; its second corollary states the inverse-square law for individual particles. ^[ref]

For distinct positions and positive masses, Newton's law of universal gravitation givesThe proposed homothetic gravitational motion has ${\ddot{\mathbf{x}}}_i=-(2/9)t^{-4/3}{\mathbf{a}}_i$ and pair distances $t^{2/3}|{\mathbf{a}}_i-{\mathbf{a}}_j|$, so cancellation of $t^{-4/3}$ gives the time-independent equationsThese define a Newtonian central configuration with this choice of scale. Fordifferentiation in ${\mathbf{a}}_i$ gives ${\nabla }_{{\mathbf{a}}_i}\Phi =(2/9)m_i{\mathbf{a}}_i-G{\sum }_{j\ne i}{m}_i{m}_j({\mathbf{a}}_i-{\mathbf{a}}_j)/|{\mathbf{a}}_i-{\mathbf{a}}_j{|}^3=0$, exactly the displayed equations. The double sum in the paper counts each pair twice, so it agrees with this expression.

Multiply the configuration equations by $m_i$ and sum. Pair contributions cancel, giving ${\sum }_i{m}_i{\mathbf{a}}_i=0$. Thus the total linear momentum is $\mathbf{P}=(2/3)t^{-1/3}{\sum }_i{m}_i{\mathbf{a}}_i=0$. Each position is parallel to its velocity, so every $m_i{\mathbf{x}}_i\times {\dot{\mathbf{x}}}_i=0$ and the total angular momentum is zero. About any other fixed point $\mathbf{b}$, it is ${\mathbf{L}}_{\mathbf{b}}={\mathbf{L}}_O-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{P}=\boxed{0}$.

Let $M=M_1+M_2$ and $\alpha =M_2/M$, with $0<\alpha <1$. In the centre of mass frame the two primary distances are $r_1=\alpha R$ and $r_2=(1-\alpha )R$. Applying Newton's law of universal gravitation and circular centripetal acceleration to the first primary gives $M_1{\omega }^2\alpha R=G{M}_1{M}_2/R^2$, and henceThe same result follows from the second primary or from the relative two-body equation of motion.

A rotating-frame equilibrium has zero rotating-frame velocity, so its Coriolis force vanishes. Above the orbital plane both primaries have downward gravitational components; below it both have upward components. The centrifugal force has no $z$ component. More explicitly,which vanishes only at $z=0$ for finite nonsingular points. Thus all equilibria lie in the orbital plane.

The equation of motion in a rotating frame for the dwarf isOn the orbital plane the centrifugal contribution is $m{\omega }^2\mathbf{r}$. Thus the rotating-frame effective potential is $E=U-m{\omega }^2(x^2+y^2)/2$; equilibria are exactly its stationary points. The Coriolis force affects motion about those equilibria but not their positions. This is the circular restricted three-body problem, with the dwarf treated as a test mass.

The printed energy unit has the wrong dimensions. The correct total energy unit is $mGM/R$, or $GM/R$ for specific energy; $GM/R^2$ is an acceleration. Dividing $E$ by $mGM/R$ and measuring lengths in units of $R$ gives the dimensionless effective potentialThe primary coordinates are $(-\alpha ,0)$ and $(1-\alpha ,0)$. Restricting to $y=0$ gives $F(x)=\mathcal{E}(x,0)$ andThe absolute values are essential; dropping them would reverse the attraction on the left of a primary. On each of the intervals separated by the two primaries, $F^{\prime }$ decreases strictly from $+\infty$ to $-\infty$. There is exactly one Collinear Lagrange point on each interval, a maximum along the $x$ direction.

For the inner Lagrange point, write $x=1-\alpha -\delta$ with $\delta >0$. For the L2 Lagrange point, write $x=1-\alpha +\delta$. The respective equations areBalancing the leading terms gives $\delta =(\alpha /3{)}^{1/3}+O({\alpha }^{2/3})$. Therefore the small-mass-ratio collinear Lagrange points obeyThe omitted $-\alpha$ displacement of the secondary is smaller than the stated error. The leading distance from the secondary is the dimensionless Hill radius.

For the L3 Lagrange point put $x=-1+c\alpha +O({\alpha }^2)$. It lies to the left of both primaries, soExpanding the two positive inverse-square factors gives $(1-\alpha )/(x+\alpha {)}^2=1+(2c+1)\alpha +O({\alpha }^2)$ and $\alpha /(x-1+\alpha {)}^2=\alpha /4+O({\alpha }^2)$. Thus $F^{\prime }=-(3c+5/4)\alpha +O({\alpha }^2)$, soAll three have $y=z=0$. The small-$\alpha$ equalities in the paper are asymptotic expressions, not exact coordinates for finite mass ratio.

For the remaining Lagrange points, introduce plane polar coordinates about the first primary: $x=-\alpha +s\cos \theta$, $y=s\sin \theta$. Its distance to the second primary is $d=(s^2+1-2s\cos \theta {)}^{1/2}$, andThe angular stationary condition is ${\partial }_{\theta }\mathcal{E}=\alpha s\sin \theta (d^{-3}-1)=0$. For an off-axis point $s>0$ and $\sin \theta \ne 0$, so $d=1$. The radial stationary condition becomesHence $s=1$, and $d=1$ implies $\cos \theta =1/2$. The Triangular Lagrange points are exactlyBoth triangles are equilateral. The collinear and off-axis calculations together exhaust the stationary points.

For the requested sketch, $\mathcal{E}$ tends to $-\infty$ at either primary and at large in-plane radius. Each Collinear Lagrange point is a saddle of the planar effective potential: its $x$ curvature is negative and its $y$ curvature is positive. To see the latter, let $d_1=|x+\alpha |$, $d_2=|x-1+\alpha |$ and $D=(1-\alpha )/d_1^3+\alpha /d_2^3$. At an inner point both distances are below one, so $D>1$. At an exterior stationary point, use barycentric positions $a_1=-\alpha$, $a_2=1-\alpha$ and weights $1-\alpha ,\alpha$: the equation implies $x(D-1)=\sum w_i{a}_i/|x-a_i{|}^3$. To the right, the weighted sum is positive because the positive primary is closer; to the left it is negative because the negative primary is closer. Thus $D>1$ there as well, and ${\mathcal{E}}_{yy}=D-1>0$.

At either Triangular Lagrange point, the planar Hessian isIts trace is $-3$ and determinant $27\alpha (1-\alpha )/4>0$, so these are local maxima. Their height is $\mathcal{E}=-3/2+\alpha (1-\alpha )/2$. The sketch below uses a finite mass ratio to separate the five points clearly; its singular wells are clipped only for display. These curvature labels concern the effective potential, not a stability test that ignores the Coriolis force.

The separation of the stars is $2R$. Newton's law of universal gravitation and circular acceleration giveTo leading nonrelativistic order, the mass density is the sum of the two translated point-mass Dirac delta distributions. Thuswith all components involving $z$ zero. The trace is $2M{R}^2$, a constant. Define the trace-free mass quadrupole moment $Q_{ij}=I_{ij}-{\delta }_{ij}{I}_{kk}/3$; its third derivatives equal those of $I_{ij}$. If $K=8M{R}^2{\Omega }^3$, thenBoth off-diagonal entries count in the contraction. Therefore ${\stackrel{...}{Q}}_{ij}{\stackrel{...}{Q}}_{ij}=2K^2=128M^2{R}^4{\Omega }^6$, independent of phase. The quadrupole formula gives the equal-mass circular-binary quadrupole luminosityRestoring units, ${\Omega }^2=GM/(4R^3)$ andHere $R$ is each star's radius about the centre of mass, not the separation. The rest-frame prescription supplies the leading mass density; a moving star does not still have zero momentum density and spatial stress. The calculation uses the assumed quadrupole formula and the Newtonian orbit rather than imposing those rest-frame zeros on the moving binary.

Take $\mathbf{r}={\mathbf{x}}_1-{\mathbf{x}}_2$, $r=|\mathbf{r}|$ and $M=M_1+M_2$. Newton's law of universal gravitation gives ${\ddot{\mathbf{x}}}_1=-G{M}_2\mathbf{r}/r^3$ and ${\ddot{\mathbf{x}}}_2=G{M}_1\mathbf{r}/r^3$. Subtracting yields the relative two-body equationThe reduced mass is $\mu =M_1{M}_2/M$. The orbital energy and angular momentum in the center of mass frame areDifferentiation givesThus both are conserved. The eccentricity vector isFor $\mathbf{h}=\mathbf{J}/\mu$, one has $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\times \mathbf{h}/(GM)=\dot{\mathbf{r}}/r-\mathbf{r}(\mathbf{r}\cdot \dot{\mathbf{r}})/r^3=d(\mathbf{r}/r)/dt$, so $\dot{\mathbf{e}}=0$. In particular the orbital eccentricity is constant, withFor a bound Kepler orbit, $E=-GM\mu /(2a)$ and $J^2=GM{\mu }^{2}a(1-e^2)$.

For the far-field multipole expansion, set the center of mass to zero. Then ${\mathbf{x}}_1=(M_2/M)\mathbf{r}$ and ${\mathbf{x}}_2=-(M_1/M)\mathbf{r}$. At $x=|\mathbf{x}|\gg r$, expand each point-mass Newtonian gravitational potential:Repeated indices are summed. The dipole vanishes since ${\sum }_A{M}_A{\mathbf{x}}_A=0$, and ${\sum }_A{M}_A{x}_{Ai}{x}_{Aj}=\mu r_i{r}_j$. The second-order gravitational quadrupole potential of a point-mass binary is thereforeBoth tensors specified in the question are trace-free. Direct contraction givesso to the requested orderFor equal masses the cubic multipole also vanishes, but it need not vanish for unequal masses.

To evaluate the quadrupole formula, use $k=GM$, $\mathbf{v}=\dot{\mathbf{r}}$, $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{r}/r$, $u=\dot{r}=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{v}$, and $\mathbf{w}=\mathbf{v}-u\mathbf{n}$. The acceleration and its derivative areThe third derivative of $r_i{r}_j$ is ${\dot{b}}_i{r}_j+r_i{\dot{b}}_j+3b_i{v}_j+3v_i{b}_j$. Its trace is $d^3(r^2)/d{t}^3=-2ku/r^2$. Substituting in $q_{ij}=\mu (3r_i{r}_j-r^2{\delta }_{ij})/2$ givesBecause $\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{w}=0$, the cross tensor contraction is zero. The squared norms of the two bracketed pieces are $6u^2$ and $72w^2$, respectively. Thusand the instantaneous energy loss isThe parenthesis is $w^2+u^2/12\ge 0$, as required for positive radiated power. This is the instantaneous quadrupole luminosity of a Kepler binary with loss sign for the orbital energy.

A slowly evolving initially circular binary is expected to follow a quasi-circular inspiral at leading radiation order. One needs angular-momentum loss as well as energy loss for this conclusion: the rotating quadrupole has frequency $2\Omega$ and azimuthal harmonic number two, so its fluxes satisfy the gravitational-wave energy and angular-momentum balance $\dot{E}=\Omega \dot{J}$. Along the circular family,The flux relation is precisely the tangent condition for remaining on that family; equivalently it keeps $e^2=1+2E{J}^2/(G^2{M}^2{\mu }^3)$ equal to zero at leading secular order. The shrinking orbit is not an exact fixed-radius circle: its small radial drift is neglected at this adiabatic order.

For a circular orbit of instantaneous separation $a$, $u=0$ and $v^2=GM/a$. ThereforeDifferentiating $E=-GM\mu /(2a)$ at fixed masses now givesWriting $C=64G^3{M}^2\mu /(5c^5)$, the circular gravitational-wave inspiral obeys $a^4=a_0^4-4Ct$. The formal point-mass coalescence time is $a_0^4/(4C)$, and $\dot{P}/P=(3/2)\dot{a}/a$ gives a decreasing orbital period and increasing gravitational-wave frequency.

Gravitational radiation tightens a detached close binary and becomes more effective at small separation. It can bring a stellar donor into Roche-lobe overflow or drive compact objects toward merger. Finite radii, tides and mass transfer can then alter the evolution; the fixed-mass inspiral law is not the entire evolution law once these matter. Near merger the weak-field, slow-motion quadrupole formula also ceases to be sufficient.

From Newton's law of universal gravitation, $F=G{m}_1{m}_2/r^2$, the gravitational constant has physical dimensionHere the two factors of mass and the inverse square of the separation determine the powers of $M$ and $L$.

Let ${\mathbf{d}}_{jn}=h(j-n){\mathbf{e}}_y$ and $\Delta \mathbf{\xi }={\mathbf{\xi }}_j-{\mathbf{\xi }}_n$, with ${\mathbf{\xi }}_n=(x_n^{\prime },y_n^{\prime })$. Linearizing the Newton's law of universal gravitation usesFor an azimuthal separation, the matrix is $\mathrm{diag}(1,-2)$. After canceling the equilibrium forces, the linearized shearing sheet equations areThe transverse gravitational response tends to restore a radial displacement, while the longitudinal response reinforces an azimuthal density concentration. Both sums converge for the bounded Fourier modes considered next.

For constant component masses, the center of mass frame has ${\mathbf{r}}_1=(M_2/M)\mathbf{r}$ and ${\mathbf{r}}_2=-(M_1/M)\mathbf{r}$. Newton's law of universal gravitation gives the relative equation $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}=-GM\mathbf{r}/r^3$. Substitution in the component angular momenta yieldsHere $\mu =M_1{M}_2/M$ is the reduced mass, while $\mathbf{h}$ is specific angular momentum.

The printed total-energy expression lacks a factor of $\mu$ in its kinetic term. With the stated physical separation coordinate, the dimensionally consistent total two-body orbital energy isThe second expression is specific orbital energy; these two conventions must not be mixed. Its conservation follows directly:For the eccentricity vector, differentiate $GM\mathbf{e}=\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \mathbf{h}-GM\hat{\mathbf{r}}$. Since $\mathbf{h}$ is constant,The cancellation is the vector triple product identity. Thus all three corrected Kepler integrals are conserved. Dotting the eccentricity relation with $\mathbf{r}$ also gives the useful orbit identity

For ballistic streamline focusing by a moving star, work in the star's rest frame and take the incoming gas to have velocity $v{\mathbf{e}}_x$, with downstream behind the star at $x>0$. A streamline with impact parameter $d>0$ approaches from $(-\infty ,d,0)$. Its upstream specific angular momentum and eccentricity vector areAt its downstream axis crossing, $\mathbf{r}=b{\mathbf{e}}_x$. The orbit identity gives $b=d^2{v}^2/(GM)-b$, hence the collision distance isAt that point, $h_z=b{u}_y=-dv$, while the $y$ component of $GM\mathbf{e}=\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{h}-GM\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ gives $dv{u}_x=d{v}^2$. ThereforeA symmetric streamline with opposite impact parameter has the opposite transverse velocity. Their shock wave removes the opposing transverse motion while preserving the common downstream component. Thus the remaining velocity is $v{\mathbf{e}}_x$ in the star frame. In the frame where the undisturbed medium is stationary, adding the star's velocity gives zero velocity immediately after this idealized collision.

After transverse kinetic energy is dissipated, the remaining specific orbital energy is ${\epsilon }_{\mathrm{after}}=v^2/2-GM/b$. It is negative if $b<2GM/v^2$, or equivalently if the upstream impact parameter satisfies $d<d_{\mathrm{cap}}=2GM/v^2$. This is the post-shock capture criterion in ballistic accretion; bound axial streams can return to the star. The captured incident mass flux through the corresponding disk gives the ballistic Bondi--Hoyle--Lyttleton accretion rate:This is the pressureless, dissipative capture model, with the shock's transverse energy unavailable to unbind the wake.

For wind mass transfer in a binary star, steady isotropic donor mass loss gives the local wind mass density at the companion:A fast wind has $v_w\gg 2\pi a/P$ and a capture scale small compared with $a$, so its relative incident speed is $v_w$ to leading order. Apply the same Bondi--Hoyle--Lyttleton accretion rate with accretor mass $M_2$ to obtainFinally, Kepler's third law eliminates the unquoted separation, $a=[G(M_1+M_2)P^2/(4{\pi }^2){]}^{1/3}$, giving the rate in terms of the stated orbital period:Equivalently, the fast-wind accretion fraction in a circular binary is $[M_2/(M_1+M_2){]}^2(v_{\mathrm{orb}}/v_w{)}^4$, with $v_{\mathrm{orb}}=2\pi a/P$ the relative circular orbital speed. Its smallness is consistent with using an almost undisturbed isotropic stellar wind.