Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 3 10E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Photon gas 2026-10-13
A photon gas is a collection of photons described statistically as radiation. Here the equilibrium model is homogeneous, isotropic electromagnetic radiation in vacuum at temperature : each photon has energy , with momentum and frequency , and there are two independent transverse states of electromagnetic polarization. An absorbing cavity with walls at a common temperature provides a way to establish this thermal equilibrium. The bulk formulas assume cavity dimensions much larger than the typical wavelength , so the electromagnetic mode density in a box can replace individual cavity modes by a continuum. [ref]
https://davidtong.org/teaching/statistical-physics/statmechhtml/S3#S3.SS2. David Tong, Statistical Physics, §3.2: photon energies, polarizations and cavity equilibrium
The crucial constraint is whether photon emission and photon absorption, or other number-changing processes, can equilibrate the photon population. When they can, photon number is not an independently conserved quantity and the equilibrium photon chemical potential is . For each polarization and frequency, the mean occupation number then follows the Bose-Einstein distribution:If number-changing processes are ineffective but number-conserving interactions redistribute energy, a constrained Bose-Einstein distribution can instead have with chemical potential fixed by the number constraint. Thus thermal equilibrium with respect to energy exchange alone does not establish . The zero value can also persist in an already prepared Planck photon distribution during suitable subsequent evolution; continual photon emission is not required to preserve it. [ref]
https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article/2014/6/06B107/1560917. Hiroyuki Tashiro, CMB spectral distortions and energy release in the early universe (2014), §3.1: kinetic equilibration without full photon-number equilibration
Combining with the two-polarization density of states, , gives the Planck photon distribution and the spectral photon energy density:Here is the spectral radiance in Planck's law; is stored energy density per unit frequency, not outgoing power per area. Their different units are connected by the full-sphere solid angle and the speed of light . The Boltzmann constant is , and is the Planck constant. [ref]
The equilibrium equation of state is particularly simple:The radiation constant is the same constant called in black-body radiation; is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. An outline of the energy density calculation substitutes and uses . The radiation pressure follows because the angular average of the squared directional component of photon momentum is for isotropy; the thermodynamic derivation of blackbody radiation pressure supplies an independent route. These formulas describe the radiation contribution, not the cavity walls. The isotropic massless relation survives a different isotropic spectrum, whereas the coefficient in requires the zero-chemical potential Planck photon distribution.
For a computed example with stipulated , the photon energy density is and the radiation pressure is . The photon number density in the International System of Units isHere is the Riemann zeta function. The mean photon energy differs from the energy at the peak of a spectral curve: counting photons and weighting them by energy emphasize different frequencies. The calculations use the exact International System of Units values of the Planck constant, Boltzmann constant and speed of light. [ref]
https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/meet-constants. NIST, Meet the Constants: exact SI defining constants
A motivating observation is the cosmic microwave background spectrum measured by the Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (FIRAS) aboard COBE. Its apparatus used a polarizing Michelson interferometer, with one input viewing a roughly seven-degree sky patch and the other an internal blackbody. Scanning mirrors changed the optical path length difference; heat-sensitive detectors recorded the varying power, and Fourier transform spectroscopy recovered the spectral difference. Operation outside the terrestrial atmosphere removed atmospheric emission and absorption, while shielding and cooling the optics in a helium cryostat suppressed the instrument's own radiation. [ref]
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/cobe/firas/doc/FES4_APP_B.pdf. Mather, Fixsen and Shafer, Design for the COBE Far Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer, apparatus and systematic-error controls
Absolute calibration came from moving an external blackbody into the sky aperture, filling the same beam used for the sky. This was an iron-loaded epoxy absorber shaped as a re-entrant cone. Repeated reflections made it a close approximation to a blackbody, while thermometers supplied its temperature. Mather and colleagues explicitly evaluated reflections, temperature gradients, radiation leaking through the material and leakage around its edge. These are limits on how faithfully the calibrator realizes thermal equilibrium radiation, rather than details that can be eliminated merely by calling it black. [ref]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9810373. Mather et al., Calibrator Design for COBE FIRAS (1999): absorber geometry and calibration error budget
During sky observations the internal blackbody temperature was adjusted to nearly null the spectral difference, reducing gain and drift errors. Fixsen and colleagues' 1996 analysis used calibrated spectra over wavenumbers to , about to . They separated the sky's spatially uniform component, its dipole and Galactic emission, and varied sky cuts and foreground templates as controls. The resulting cosmic microwave background spectrum agreed with a single Planck function, with reported RMS deviations below 50 parts per million of its peak brightness. This is a residual statistic over the analyzed spectrum, not a pointwise relative error bound at every frequency. [ref]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9605054. Fixsen et al., The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set (1996), §§2, 5 and 5.3
The observation motivates using a photon gas as a physical model rather than merely a formal counting exercise. Its interpretation has a clear boundary: agreement with Planck's law constrains departures from an equilibrium spectral shape within the calibrated band and foreground assumptions; it does not directly measure radiation pressure or entropy density of a photon gas. Nor does it establish that today's cosmic microwave background is continually re-equilibrating with matter. A previously thermal spectrum can retain its Planck function shape as expansion of the universe lowers every photon frequency in the same proportion. The usefulness of the model is that one measured spectral temperature, together with its equilibrium assumptions, predicts energy density, radiation pressure, photon number density and entropy density of a photon gas consistently.
Statistical physics Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-13
Statistical physics explains collective behavior using probability distributions over microscopic possibilities. Its central surprise is that incomplete microscopic knowledge can still produce precise predictions for internal energy, entropy and heat capacity. The bridge is statistical mechanics: specify the available microstates, assign their probabilities, then compute the expected values of measured quantities.
A two-level system already displays the idea. Warming it makes its higher energy more likely; its heat capacity first rises, then falls as the two probabilities approach equality. With two distinguishable units, merely counting microstates explains why the middle energy has twice the state degeneracy. These small examples expose the machinery before the much larger sums needed for a photon gas or an Ising model.
The appeal is economical: the same microscopic energies and probabilities explain both an average reading and its variance. A measurement's spread therefore becomes useful physical information rather than an inconvenience to discard.
