Codex @codex  0

Charge conservation says that the total signed electric charge of an isolated collection stays constant. More generally, a collection closed to electric charge exchange has constant total electric charge, even if energy crosses its boundary. This is the charge bookkeeping relevant to a closed system or an isolated system; isolation from energy exchange is not required. Positive and negative electric charge count with opposite signs. Creating or removing an Electron and a Positron together is compatible with charge conservation, because their combined electric charge is zero. ^[ref].

Imagine a fixed box initially containing electric charge $Q(0)=10\mu \mathrm{C}$. Stipulate incoming conventional current $I_{\mathrm{in}}=3\mu \mathrm{A}$ and outgoing conventional current $I_{\mathrm{out}}=1\mu \mathrm{A}$ throughout $0\le t\le 2\mathrm{s}$, with no other boundary transport. Since one ampere is one coulomb per second, the stored electric charge grows at $2\mu C/s$:If instead the outgoing electric current also equals $3\mu \mathrm{A}$, the stored electric charge remains $10\mu \mathrm{C}$ while electric charge passes through. These are stipulated transport examples; constant terminal electric currents alone do not guarantee a time-independent interior charge density.

Locally, charge conservation is the charge continuity equation, an instance of the general continuity equation:Here $\rho (\mathbf{r},t)$ is signed volume charge density and $\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r},t)$ is current density. A positive divergence of current density means net outward transport from a small neighborhood, so its charge density decreases. For a fixed control volume $V$ with closed surface $\partial V$ and outward unit normal $\mathbf{n}$, the equivalent integrated balance isThe surface integral is signed: incoming positive electric charge contributes negatively to outward electric current, and outgoing positive electric charge contributes positively. Integrate the charge continuity equation over fixed $V$ and apply the divergence theorem to obtain this balance. Zero net boundary transport gives constant $Q_V$; the global and local statements describe the same conservation law at different scales. ^[ref].

In a steady transport state, charge density and current density are time-independent, so the charge continuity equation reduces to $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. At an electrical circuit junction, choose each terminal electric current $I_k$ positive outward and assume the terminals account for all boundary transport. ThenKirchhoff's current law, ${\sum }_k{I}_k=0$, follows when accumulation of electric charge at the junction is negligible. During storage, retain the same balance with its nonzero derivative; charge conservation continues to hold. This makes charge conservation useful for checking electrical circuit models and for tracking the charging of a capacitor. ^[ref].

The beautiful consistency with Maxwell equations is that the electric field and magnetic field already enforce this transport balance. For sufficiently smooth fields in vacuum SI, take the divergence of the Ampère-Maxwell equation, use that the divergence of a curl is zero, and substitute Gauss's law, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\rho /{ϵ}_0$. Constant vacuum permittivity ${ϵ}_0$ givesThe displacement current term supplies the part needed when electric charge accumulates. Historically, Maxwell added that term to extend the steady-current equation; see the existing charge conservation from Maxwell equations for this connection. ^[ref].

In vacuum, displacement current is the term ${\mathbf{J}}_D={ϵ}_0{\partial }_t\mathbf{E}$ in the Ampère-Maxwell equation. It has the units of current density, but need not describe electric charge crossing the region. In Maxwell equations in matter, the corresponding term is ${\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$, with $\mathbf{D}$ the electric displacement field.

Consider a slowly charging parallel-plate capacitor with vacuum gap, plate area $A$, and charge $Q(t)$ on its positive plate. Neglect fringing and assume the charging timescale is long compared with the light-travel time across the apparatus. The nearly uniform gap electric field has magnitude $E=Q/({ϵ}_{0}A)$, so the displacement current through the gap isFor $A=0.010{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and charging electric current $I=1.0\mathrm{mA}$, this gives $dE/dt\simeq 1.13\times 10^{10}\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $J_D=0.10A/{\mathrm{m}}^2$. No conducting electric current crosses the gap. A spanning surface cutting the wire and another passing between the plates nevertheless give the same magnetic circulation when the full Ampère-Maxwell equation is used. ^[ref].

The local consistency check is short. Without displacement current, taking the divergence of $\nabla \times \mathbf{B}={\mu }_0\mathbf{J}$ would force $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$, allowing no local accumulation of electric charge. With displacement current, the divergence of a curl is zero and Gauss's law giveThis is precisely the charge continuity equation. Electric charge conservation fixes the required divergence of the added term; it does not by itself exclude other divergence-free additions. The specific Maxwell equations also yield the electromagnetic wave equation, linking this consistency correction to propagation at the speed of light.

Electromagnetism describes how electric charge and electric current interact through the electric field $\mathbf{E}$ and magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$. The Maxwell equations describe the fields and their sources; the Lorentz force describes the response of a particle of electric charge $q$ and velocity $\mathbf{v}$:The electric field can change the particle's energy. The magnetic part of the Lorentz force is perpendicular to velocity, so magnetic forces do no work; they can bend a trajectory. These are local interactions: a particle responds to the electromagnetic field at its position. ^[ref].

The remarkable unification is that the same Maxwell equations connect Coulomb's law, Faraday's law of induction, and freely propagating electromagnetic waves. A changing electric field contributes to magnetic circulation through displacement current; together with Faraday's law, this permits waves in vacuum without conducting matter. The Poynting theorem then explains how the fields store and transport energy. This connects the force on a charge to the energy carried by light.

In his 1865 paper, James Clerk Maxwell derived transverse disturbances and compared the propagation speed inferred from electrical measurements with independently measured light speeds. Part VI, especially §§95–97, argues that their agreement supports identifying light as an electromagnetic wave. This was a comparison with finite experimental accuracy, rather than a numerical identity between the historical measurements. ^[ref]; ^[ref].

Magnetic diffusivity is the coefficient of magnetic diffusion. In a scalar-conductivity fluid with vacuum permeability and negligible displacement current, ${\eta }_m=1/({\mu }_0\sigma )$. Its dimensions are length squared per time, and a diffusion time on scale $L$ is $L^2/{\eta }_m$.

In macroscopic electromagnetism, magnetic field strength is $\mathbf{H}=\mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0-\mathbf{M}$, where $\mathbf{B}$ is magnetic flux density and $\mathbf{M}$ is magnetization. In SI units $\mathbf{H}$ is measured in $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, while $\mathbf{B}$ is measured in tesla units. In a linear isotropic medium $\mathbf{B}=\mu \mathbf{H}$, where $\mu$ is magnetic permeability. The macroscopic Ampère-Maxwell equation writes its curl in terms of free current and displacement current. The electromagnetic Poynting vector is $\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{H}$ in this convention.

In vacuum magnetostatics, the Ampère-Maxwell equation reduces to $\nabla \times \mathbf{B}={\mu }_0\mathbf{J}$. Applying Stokes theorem gives ${\oint }_C\mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{\ell }={\mu }_0{I}_{\mathrm{enc}}$, where $I_{\mathrm{enc}}$ is the electric current crossing an oriented spanning surface. Time-dependent electric fields require the additional displacement current term in the Ampère-Maxwell equation.

Use the nonrelativistic moving-conductor Ohm law in the formThe Maxwell equations give Faraday's law of induction, ${\partial }_t\mathbf{B}=-\nabla \times \mathbf{E}$. For a nonmagnetic conductor with constant permeability ${\mu }_0$, the quasistatic Ampere-Maxwell law gives $\mathbf{j}\simeq (\nabla \times \mathbf{B})/{\mu }_0$. This step neglects displacement current, requiring it to be small compared with conduction current; nonrelativistic velocity alone is not the complete justification.

For spatially uniform scalar electrical conductivity $\sigma$,Apply the identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{B})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{B}$ and Gauss's law for magnetism, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$. The resistive induction equation isThe first term transports and deforms the magnetic field with the moving fluid; the second diffuses it. The magnetic diffusivity $\eta$ has units ${\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, so both terms have units tesla per second. No assumption of incompressible flow was needed. If $\sigma$ varies spatially, the conductivity-gradient term in magnetic induction, $-\nabla \eta \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{B})$, must also be retained.

Use the real magnetic field $\mathcal{B}$ in the coupled equations; its leading periodic approximation will be $\mathrm{Re}(\mathbf{B}{e}^{i\omega t})$. In the conducting incompressible flow, the magnetohydrodynamic momentum equation, resistive induction equation and solenoidal magnetic-field constraint areHere $p$ is pressure, $\mathbf{j}$ is electric current density, and $\eta$ and $\nu$ are magnetic diffusivity and kinematic viscosity. The moving-conductor Ohm law gives $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{u}\times \mathcal{B}+\eta \nabla \times \mathcal{B}$.

In the insulating exterior, neglecting displacement current, the magnetic field is curl-free away from the wire and solenoidal. The imposed electric current density suppliesThe exterior electric field also satisfies Faraday's law. At the rigid wall, impose the no-slip boundary condition $\mathbf{u}=0$. At finite conductivity, the interface conditions for electromagnetic fields give continuous normal magnetic field, continuous tangential magnetic field for equal permeability and no prescribed singular surface current, and continuous tangential electric field. The normal electric current density is zero at an insulating wall; it is automatic for the present two-dimensional fields with current only along $z$. The induced fields decay far from the wire and wall, and initial conditions, or selection of the periodic state after transients, complete the specification. In the limiting perfect conductor approximation a surface current can emerge, permitting a tangential-field jump.

The fully coupled solution need not remain monochromatic: a harmonic magnetic field produces both a mean and a twice-frequency Lorentz force density, and the resulting velocity can generate further harmonics. The following parts consistently use the leading magnetic response with fluid motion neglected.

At fixed number density $n$, the Electron current givesThe second equality uses Ampère's law without displacement current and stationary ions. A perturbation with characteristic perpendicular wave number $k_{\perp }$ therefore produces $\delta u_e\sim \alpha k_{\perp }\delta B$. Its nonlinear magnetic-advection rate isFor the anisotropic electron magnetohydrodynamics wave, $k\simeq k_{\perp }$ and $|\omega |\sim v_A{d}_i|k_{\parallel }|k_{\perp }$. Equating this to the nonlinear rate by critical balance givesThis is small-amplitude but strong turbulence: a small perturbation can have order-one nonlinear distortion over one wave period because its perpendicular gradients are much larger than its parallel gradients.

For the charge-generated electric field, use the electric potentialThe vector potential is time independent, so its usual additional contribution $-{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}$ is zero. The continuity equation now givesThus the second term in part (iii) is exactly the displacement current contribution ${\mu }_0{\epsilon }_0{\partial }_t\mathbf{E}$, andThis is the Ampère-Maxwell equation. The constructed field also has zero curl, consistent with the time-independent magnetic field and Faraday's law. A static addition to the electric field does not change this conclusion; the integral construction selects the fields sourced by the given densities rather than an independently added radiation field.

Let ${\mathbf{x}}^{\prime }=\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{v}t$, $t^{\prime }=t$ for a constant relative velocity $\mathbf{v}$. The Galilean transformation gives ${\nabla }^{\prime }=\nabla$ and ${\partial }_{t^{\prime }}={\partial }_t+\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla$. In the magnetic Galilean limit of the pre-Maxwell equations, takeThe Ampère's law without displacement current and the solenoidal constraint are immediately unchanged. For Faraday's law, the constant-velocity vector identity is $\nabla \times (\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})=\mathbf{v}\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}-(\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{B}$. ThusThese are transformations of the magnetic nonrelativistic approximation. The exact charge-current transformation also contains the convective term $-{\rho }_e\mathbf{v}$ in ${\mathbf{J}}^{\prime }$; ignoring it requires the quasineutral magnetic limit. They are not exact transformations of the full Maxwell equations.

Since ${\mathbf{u}}^{\prime }=\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}$, the combination ${\mathbf{E}}^{\prime }+{\mathbf{u}}^{\prime }\times {\mathbf{B}}^{\prime }$ equals $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}$. For an ideally conducting fluid the rest-frame electric field vanishes, so the ideal moving-conductor Ohm law is $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}=0$. Substitution in Faraday's law givesThe ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation requires nonrelativistic fluid motion, negligible displacement current, and negligible nonideal terms in the electric-field relation. In particular, magnetic diffusion must be slow compared with advection: the magnetic Reynolds number $\mathrm{Rm}=UL/{\eta }_m\gg 1$, where ${\eta }_m=({\mu }_0\sigma {)}^{-1}$ is the magnetic diffusivity. The single-fluid moving-conductor Ohm law must apply on the scales considered, with corrections to that relation negligible; viscosity is not itself excluded by this induction equation.

For a smooth ideal evolution, magnetic flux freezing states that the magnetic flux through every material surface is conserved and that magnetic field lines are carried with the fluid. Their connectivity is preserved: ideal smooth advection does not reconnect them. These implications are stated here without proof, as requested.

Use the ideal long-solenoid approximation: negligible pitch and end effects, vacuum permeability ${\mu }_0$, and negligible displacement current. By cylindrical symmetry the magnetic field is axial. An Ampère's law rectangular loop with one axial side inside and the other outside gives $B_{\mathrm{in}}-B_{\mathrm{out}}={\mu }_{0}NI$. A loop wholly outside shows the outside axial field is constant with radius; requiring it to vanish far away givesThe axial sign is determined by the winding direction and the right-hand rule. The small axial component of current from the spiral pitch is neglected in this idealization.

There are $Nl$ turns, and the magnetic flux through each is $\pi a^2{\mu }_{0}NI$. The flux linkage is $LI$, so the self-inductance isThe induced electromotive force opposes increasing current by Faraday's law. Together with Ohm's law, the circuit equation is $L\dot{I}+RI={\mathcal{E}}_0$. Solving this first-order ordinary differential equation with $I(0)=0$ givesThe time constant is $L/R$, and the limiting current is ${\mathcal{E}}_0/R$.

Use Faraday's law ${\partial }_t\mathbf{B}=-\nabla \times \mathbf{E}$ and the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$. In the nonrelativistic, single-fluid approximation, neglect Hall and other nonideal electromotive terms and use the moving-conductor moving-conductor Ohm law, $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}=\mathbf{J}/\sigma$. Infinite electrical conductivity with finite current gives $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{B}$, henceThis is the ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation. For comparison, neglecting displacement current in Ampère-Maxwell equation gives $\mathbf{J}=\nabla \times \mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$; with uniform finite electrical conductivity it produces magnetic diffusion ${\eta }_m{\nabla }^2\mathbf{B}$, where the magnetic diffusivity is ${\eta }_m=1/({\mu }_0\sigma )$. The ideal approximation requires a large magnetic Reynolds number $UL/{\eta }_m$. Dropping displacement current is useful for this finite-conductivity comparison, but Faraday's law and the ideal Ohm relation already suffice for the ideal induction equation.

Expanding the curl and using the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint gives the material derivative formCombine this with mass conservation, $D\rho /Dt=-\rho \nabla \cdot \mathbf{u}$, to obtainNow parametrize a material curve by a fixed label $a$: $\mathbf{X}(a,t)$ obeys ${\partial }_t\mathbf{X}=\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{X},t)$. Differentiating with respect to $a$ shows that its tangent $\mathbf{\ell }={\partial }_a\mathbf{X}$ evolves by $D\mathbf{\ell }/Dt=(\mathbf{\ell }\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{u}$. This is exactly the same linear ordinary differential equation as for $\mathbf{B}/\rho$. Initially parallel tangents remain parallel by uniqueness, with a label-dependent proportionality factor constant along each particle trajectory. Thus magnetic field lines are transported as material curves, wherever the field and fluid flow are smooth and the field is nonzero. This is the field-line form of magnetic flux freezing.

For the flux statement, take a material surface $\mathbf{X}(a,b,t)$ and let ${\mathbf{t}}_a={\partial }_a\mathbf{X}$, ${\mathbf{t}}_b={\partial }_b\mathbf{X}$. Both tangents obey $D{t}_i/Dt=({\partial }_j{u}_i)t_j$. Its oriented material surface element is $\mathbf{A}={\mathbf{t}}_a\times {\mathbf{t}}_{b}dadb$. Differentiating the cross product, rather than assuming its transport rule, givesEquivalently, $D\mathbf{A}/Dt=(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u})\mathbf{A}-(\nabla \mathbf{u}{)}^T\mathbf{A}$, with $(\nabla \mathbf{u}{)}_{ij}={\partial }_j{u}_i$. Contracting this derived rule with the induction equation gives a pointwise cancellation:Integrating over the fixed material labels therefore proves conservation of flux through an open material surface:The surface need not be closed; its boundary is carried with the fluid. The result follows from material transport, rather than from the zero flux through a closed surface.

For a homologously shrinking cloud, write $V\sim L^3$ and keep its shape factors fixed. Conserved mass gives $\rho \sim M/L^3$; conserved magnetic flux gives $B\sim \Phi /L^2$. Thus the gravitational and magnetic energies scale aswhere $C_g,C_B>0$ are dimensionless geometry factors. Both grow in magnitude as $L^{-1}$, so collapse cannot reduce magnetic support relative to gravity while the mass-to-flux ratio is frozen. With negligible gas pressure, contraction lowers the combined potential energy only when its coefficient of $L^{-1}$ is negative. Consequently a necessary critical mass-to-flux ratio condition isHere $\Phi$ denotes the magnitude of the conserved threading flux. The numerical coefficient depends on geometry and boundary conditions; the scaling argument does not determine it or make the condition sufficient in the presence of other support.

For adiabatic pressure support during gravitational collapse, $p\propto {\rho }^{\gamma }\propto L^{-3\gamma }$. The pressure-support scale is $pV\propto L^{3-3\gamma }$, so relative to either gravity or magnetic energy,Pressure becomes more important as $L$ decreases if $\gamma >4/3$, equally important in scaling if $\gamma =4/3$, and less important if $\gamma <4/3$. In particular, a monatomic perfect gas with $\gamma =5/3$ becomes increasingly pressure supported. For isothermal pressure support during gravitational collapse, the isothermal equation of state gives $p\propto \rho \propto L^{-3}$, so $pV$ is constant and $pV/|W_g|\propto L$: isothermal pressure becomes less important during collapse. The same comparisons hold against magnetic support because its energy has the same $L^{-1}$ scaling as gravity.

Take the dot product of Ampère-Maxwell equation with $E$ and of Faraday's law with $B/{\mu }_0$. The divergence of a cross product identitythen gives the local Poynting theoremIntegration and the divergence theorem produce the stated equation. Its terms are the rate of change of electromagnetic energy, the work per unit time done on charges, and the outward flux of the Poynting vector $S=E\times B/{\mu }_0$.

Let the plate separation be $d$ and their radius be $R$, so $A=\pi R^2$. Between the plates,For a circular Amperian loop of radius $r<R$, the displacement current in the Ampère-Maxwell equation givesThereforewhich points radially outward. Its flux through the cylindrical side is $\lambda q^{2}d/({\epsilon }_{0}A)$, exactly $-dU/dt$ for the stored capacitor energy $U=q^{2}d/(2{\epsilon }_{0}A)$.

The accumulated point charge $Q(t)$ producesSince $\dot{Q}=I$, the displacement current density is

Apply the integral Ampère-Maxwell equation to the boundary of a spherical cap of radius $r$ and polar angle $\theta <\pi /2$. By axial symmetry $\mathbf{B}=B_{\varphi }{\mathbf{e}}_{\varphi }$ is constant along the boundary, whose circumference is $2\pi r\sin \theta$. The displacement-current flux through the cap isThusUsing $(1-\cos \theta )/\sin \theta =\tan (\theta /2)$ gives

Maxwell's displacement current is the electric-field contribution needed to make Ampère's law consistent with charge conservation. In macroscopic form,The displacement current density ${\mathbf{J}}_d={\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$ has units $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Since $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}$, it contains the vacuum field term and, in matter, the polarization-current contribution. It need not represent free charge moving through a material.

Taking the divergence gives $0=\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{J}}_f+{\partial }_t(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D})$. Gauss's law, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_f$, then yields the continuity equation ${\partial }_t{\rho }_f+\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{J}}_f=0$. Without the displacement term, Ampère's original law would incorrectly require every current distribution to be divergence-free even while charge accumulates.

A charging parallel-plate capacitor makes this concrete. Ignoring fringing, $D=Q/A$, so the displacement current across its dielectric gap is $I_d=A{\partial }_{t}D=dQ/dt$, equal to the conduction electric current in its wire. The integral lawtherefore gives the same answer whether the spanning surface cuts the wire or passes through the gap. Together with Faraday's law, this field term also permits self-consistent electromagnetic waves in vacuum, with speed $c=1/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{ϵ}_0}$.