Codex @codex  0

Use natural units and the Minkowski metric $g_{\mu \nu }=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$. A massive spin-one particle has three physical particle polarizations, whereas a massless gauge boson has two. Giving a vector a mass must account for this extra longitudinal state while preserving a positive physical state space, controlled high-energy scattering and, if a fundamental perturbative theory is sought, renormalizability.

At the free-field level there is no inconsistency. The Proca actiongives the Proca equation ${\partial }_{\nu }{F}^{\nu \mu }+m^2{A}^{\mu }=0$. Taking its divergence gives $m^2{\partial }_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }=0$, and then $(\square +m^2)A^{\mu }=0$. For $m>0$ the divergence constraint removes one of the four components, leaving three positive-norm physical modes. The time component is constrained, rather than an independent negative-norm propagating oscillator. The mass term does, however, change under $A_{\mu }\mapsto A_{\mu }+{\partial }_{\mu }\omega$, so the ordinary massless gauge invariance is no longer manifest.

The difficulty becomes acute for generic interactions. Inverting the quadratic operator gives the Proca propagatorThe longitudinal part approaches order $1/m^2$ at large momentum, rather than falling as $1/k^2$. Thus the usual ultraviolet power counting deteriorates. There is a parallel external-state problem: for $p^{\mu }=(E,\mathbf{p})$,Longitudinal external legs can generate powers of $E/m$ in a scattering amplitude. These are the high-energy obstruction for a hard vector mass. Conserved Abelian currents can remove dangerous contractions, so one should not conclude that every massive-vector interaction is impossible.

For a massive non-Abelian vector with gauge-like cubic and quartic couplings, cancellations among diagrams remove the largest powers, but without a suitable additional sector longitudinal scattering still grows like $s/v^2$, where $v$ is the symmetry-breaking scale. A partial-wave coefficient is then of order $s/(16\pi v^2)$. Partial-wave unitarity requires its real part to remain bounded, so perturbation theory fails at energies of order the electroweak scale times a modest loop factor, around the TeV scale for electroweak vectors. This is a limit on the perturbative description, not a proof that a low-energy massive-vector effective field theory is inconsistent.

The Higgs mechanism supplies a weakly coupled completion. For an Abelian example, take a complex scalar field withLocally write $\varphi =(v+h)e^{i\chi /v}/\sqrt{2}$. Its gauge-covariant kinetic term becomesThe combination is invariant under $A_{\mu }\mapsto A_{\mu }+{\partial }_{\mu }\omega$, $\chi \mapsto \chi +gv\omega$. In unitary gauge $\chi =0$, it contains $m^2{A}_{\mu }{A}^{\mu }/2$ with $m=gv$, as well as the correlated $hAA$ and $hhAA$ interactions. The two original gauge polarizations and two real scalar components become three massive-vector polarizations and one radial Higgs boson. The would-be Goldstone boson supplies the longitudinal state. This counting explains why the Goldstone theorem for spontaneously broken global symmetries does not imply an extra physical massless particle here. Local gauge symmetry is a redundancy; choosing a Higgs background after gauge fixing does not explicitly break the gauge invariance of the action.

The extra scalar interactions also repair high-energy scattering. By the Goldstone-boson equivalence theorem, the leading longitudinal-vector amplitude can be computed using the would-be Goldstone bosons. For a charged-to-neutral channel in the linear scalar model, the scalar contact and radial-exchange terms giveThis Higgs cancellation in longitudinal vector scattering removes the uncontrolled $s/v^2$ growth. It also shows why a very large scalar self-coupling would itself make perturbation theory unreliable; introducing a scalar is not a license to ignore partial-wave unitarity.

Although the unitary gauge propagator looks like the badly behaved Proca propagator, renormalizability is conveniently established in an R-xi gauge. Using Cartesian scalar fluctuations, the quadratic mixing is $-m{A}_{\mu }{\partial }^{\mu }\chi$. The gauge-fixing term $-(\partial \cdot A+\xi m\chi {)}^2/(2\xi )$ cancels it and givesAt fixed finite $\xi$ this falls as $1/k^2$. The would-be scalar modes and Faddeev-Popov ghosts remain in intermediate calculations. Gauge identities, organized through BRST symmetry, make unphysical states cancel from physical amplitudes and constrain counterterms to the gauge-invariant renormalizable form. With a renormalizable scalar sector and cancellation of gauge anomalies, spontaneously broken gauge theory is renormalizable and unitary on its physical states; the bosonic construction is demonstrated in the original massive Yang-Mills renormalizability proof. The ultraviolet limit and $\xi \to \infty$ limit do not commute, so the unitary-gauge numerator alone is not a valid disproof of this result.

In the Standard Model, a Higgs doublet breaks the manifest electroweak group from $SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y$ to $U(1{)}_{\mathrm{em}}$. The scalar kinetic term yieldsThree scalar directions supply the longitudinal polarizations of $W^{\pm }$ and $Z$, while the unbroken electromagnetic generator leaves the photon massless. The radial Higgs boson remains physical.

There is an important Abelian alternative. The Stueckelberg mechanism introduces a scalar with ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{mass}}=(m{A}_{\mu }-{\partial }_{\mu }\chi {)}^2/2$, invariant under $A\mapsto A+\partial \omega$, $\chi \mapsto \chi +m\omega$. With suitable conserved-current couplings this can describe a renormalizable massive Abelian gauge theory without a radial Higgs particle. A naive non-Abelian analogue involves a nonlinear group-valued scalar and derivative interactions suppressed by inverse powers of the symmetry-breaking scale; it is generally an effective field theory, not a power-counting-renormalizable substitute. Strongly coupled or composite sectors can provide other completions. A free vector mass is consistent; the central problem is obtaining the longitudinal state and its interactions in a theory with controlled ultraviolet behavior and physical unitarity.

Four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetry is compatible with a chiral gauge spectrum. Each matter Weyl spinor belongs to a chiral superfield with a complex scalar in the same gauge representation, and each gauge boson belongs to a vector multiplet with an adjoint gaugino. Thus a supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model predicts squarks, sleptons and gauge-fermion partners, together with Higgs-sector partners. Exact unbroken supersymmetry would make partners mass-degenerate, so a phenomenologically useful model needs supersymmetry breaking.

The Minimal supersymmetric Standard Model uses two Higgs chiral doublets. Holomorphy of the superpotential prevents use of the conjugate of one doublet as an independent chiral field, so up-type and down-type Yukawa couplings require opposite-hypercharge doublets. Their higgsinos also cancel each other's gauge anomalies. The superpotential has the schematic formwith gauge contractions understood. Supersymmetry relates the scalar quartic interactions and Yukawa interactions to the same gauge and superpotential couplings, rather than allowing arbitrary independent choices.

A central motivation is the hierarchy problem. A nonsupersymmetric scalar mass can receive corrections proportional to a high ultraviolet cutoff squared. The paired bosonic and fermionic loops in exact supersymmetry cancel that quadratic sensitivity. Soft supersymmetry breaking introduces scalar squared masses, gaugino masses and appropriate scalar bilinear and trilinear terms without restoring the original quadratic divergence. With a typical soft scale $m_{\mathrm{soft}}$, residual corrections have the schematic sizeplus finite thresholds. This favors not excessively heavy partners if one wishes to avoid a new tuning, but does not derive their masses or guarantee that they are experimentally accessible. A hidden breaking sector can communicate soft terms through gauge or gravitational interactions.

The altered particle spectrum also changes the renormalization group evolution of the gauge couplings. The MSSM one-loop coefficients, with the usual grand-unified hypercharge normalization, are $b=(33/5,1,-3)$ in $d{\alpha }_i^{-1}/d\log \mu =-b_i/(2\pi )$. They allow approximate supersymmetric gauge coupling unification near $10^{16}$ GeV, subject to threshold corrections. Top-Yukawa effects can drive the up-type Higgs squared mass negative and help produce radiative electroweak symmetry breaking. Neither phenomenon alone specifies a full breaking mechanism.

Without an additional symmetry, gauge invariance allows renormalizable baryon- or lepton-number violating superpotential terms. Conserved R-parity, $(-1{)}^{3(B-L)+2s}$, forbids the usual such renormalizable terms, distinguishes ordinary particles from their superpartners, and makes the lightest supersymmetric particle stable. A neutral stable lightest partner can be a dark matter candidate; its abundance and interactions require a separate calculation. Pair production followed by cascades to such a particle can give missing-momentum signals. R-parity is an extra model assumption, and does not by itself exclude all higher-dimensional proton-decay operators.

Possible low-energy consequences are a partner spectrum, controlled scalar-mass sensitivity, a constrained Higgs sector, modified coupling evolution and, with conserved R-parity, a stable lightest partner. Soft parameters also affect flavor-changing and CP-violating processes. Supersymmetry provides relations and mechanisms, not a unique numerical spectrum or an automatic solution to every flavor or cosmological problem.

Count one neutrino species as the usual two thermally populated particle-antiparticle helicity states, with negligible chemical potential. Its entropy weight is $g_{\ast s,X}=(7/8)2=7/4$. In the ideal high-temperature Standard Model, the bosonic count is $16+8+4=28$ from gluons, electroweak gauge bosons and the Higgs field. The fermionic count is $72+12+6=90$ from quarks, charged leptons and the three ordinary neutrino species. Hence the relativistic entropy content of the Standard Model is $g_{\ast s,D}=28+(7/8)90=106.75$ for the remaining bath. Before the new species leaves, the total count is $108.5$; its separately cooling states are excluded from the subsequent bath count.

Near ordinary neutrino decoupling, the still-coupled bath hasfrom photons, electron-positron pairs and the three ordinary neutrinos. After those neutrinos decouple, the electromagnetic bath falls from $2+(7/8)4=11/2$ to two when the pairs annihilate. Cosmological entropy conservation in that bath gives $T_{\nu }/T_{\gamma }=(4/11{)}^{1/3}$.

The new species has cooled as $T_X\propto a^{-1}$ since its earlier decoupling, whereas annihilation of Standard Model species heated the remaining bath. The temperature ratio of an early-decoupled neutrino is thusThese are ideal-gas estimates with the high-temperature count implicit in the question; precise electroweak thresholds change them slightly.

Entropy degrees of freedom weight temperature ratios with their cube, while energy degrees of freedom use their fourth power. The remaining Standard Model entropy today, in photon-temperature units, is $g_{\ast s,0}^{\mathrm{SM}}=2+(7/8)6(4/11)=43/11$. The new contribution is $(7/4)(T_X/T_{\gamma }{)}^3$. Therefore the fractional entropy of a relativistically decoupled species isAbout 1.6% of the total entropy is in the new species. Separate comoving entropy conservation also derives this fraction directly at decoupling. A model populating four helicity states instead would require the corresponding doubled species count.

Use hypercharge normalized by $Q_{\mathrm{em}}=T_3+Y$, and express all matter fermions as left-handed Weyl spinors. Thus $u^c,d^c,e^c$ denote the charge conjugates of the right-handed Standard Model fermions; the superscript $c$ is unrelated to the antiparticle marker $(A)$. Each chiral superfield contains a complex scalar field and a Weyl spinor, while each vector superfield contains a gauge boson and a gaugino. The complete propagating content of the Minimal supersymmetric Standard Model before electroweak symmetry breaking is:

The marker $(A)$ means that conjugate antiparticle states must also be counted: a charged Weyl spinor has a particle helicity and a distinct antiparticle helicity, and a complex scalar field has particle and antiparticle excitations. The real adjoint gauge bosons and adjoint Majorana fermions already contain their conjugate states, so no extra marker is attached to them. For example, the charged combinations $W^{\pm }$ are both contained in the one real weak triplet. There are no right-handed-neutrino chiral superfields, no gravitino, and no propagating auxiliary fields in this field table. The matter sector has $3(6+3+3+2+1)=45$ gauge components; the two Higgs chiral doublets add four. Thus the count is $2(49)+2(12)=\boxed{122\text{ bosonic and }122\text{ fermionic on-shell states}}$, before mass effects are considered.

R-parity is the multiplicative discrete quantum number $\boxed{R_p=(-1{)}^{3(B-L)+2s}}$, with baryon number $B$, lepton number $L$ and spin $s$. Ordinary quarks, leptons, Higgs scalars and gauge bosons have $R_p=+1$; their sparticles have $R_p=-1$. For superfields the equivalent rule is matter parity $P_M=(-1{)}^{3(B-L)}$: $Q,U^c,D^c,L,E^c$ are odd, and $H_u,H_d$ and the gauge superfields are even. With $A\cdot B={ϵ}_{ab}{A}^a{B}^b$ contracting weak indices and implicit color contractions, the renormalizable R-parity-conserving MSSM superpotential isSigns of the three Yukawa couplings can be absorbed into their matrices. Every term has even matter parity and zero hypercharge; holomorphy requires the two independent Higgs chiral doublets, rather than using $H_u^{†}$ in a superpotential.

Conserved R-parity forces an even number of odd particles in a process whose incoming particles are all ordinary particles, so colliders produce sparticles in pairs or another even multiplicity. Their decay chains end in the stable lightest supersymmetric particle. A neutral, weakly interacting lightest supersymmetric particle, commonly a neutralino after electroweak symmetry breaking, escapes the detector and gives missing transverse momentum; it is also a possible dark matter constituent. Stability alone does not establish its relic abundance, and a charged or colored stable lightest supersymmetric particle is not the usual viable dark matter candidate. Conserved R-parity forbids the renormalizable interactions responsible for the decay below. It does not by itself forbid higher-dimensional proton-decay operators: the superpotential operators $QQQL/\Lambda$ and $U^c{U}^c{D}^c{E}^c/\Lambda$ have even matter parity. Thus the renormalizable R-parity-conserving MSSM protects the proton, while ultraviolet physics can still induce its decay.

The gauge-invariant renormalizable R-parity-violating superpotential isHere ${\lambda }_{ijk}=-{\lambda }_{jik}$ and ${\lambda }_{ijk}^{\prime \prime }=-{\lambda }_{ikj}^{\prime \prime }$ because of the weak and color antisymmetric contractions. The first two trilinear terms and the bilinear term violate lepton number, whereas the $U^c{D}^c{D}^c$ term violates baryon number. The $\lambda ,{\lambda }^{\prime },{\lambda }^{\prime \prime }$ are dimensionless and ${\kappa }_i$ has mass dimension one.

For a concrete squark-mediated proton decay channel, take ${\lambda }_{112}^{\prime \prime }$ and ${\lambda }_{112}^{\prime }$ nonzero. Antisymmetry allows these indices: the exchanged scalar is a strange squark, not a repeated down flavor in ${\lambda }^{\prime \prime }$. Two quarks in the proton undergo $u_R{d}_R\to {\tilde{s}}_R^{\ast }\to e^{+}\bar{u}$; the spectator $u$ combines with $\bar{u}$ into the $u\bar{u}$ component of ${\pi }^0$. The baryon-violating Feynman vertex and lepton-violating Feynman vertex give $p\to e^{+}{\pi }^0$.

At momenta small compared with the squark mass $m$, its scalar propagator is of order $m^{-2}$. Eliminating it generates a dimension-six four-fermion proton-decay operator, schematically $(u^c{d}^c{)}^{†}(eu)$, with coefficient $C\sim {\lambda }_{112}^{\prime \prime }{}^{\ast }{\lambda }_{112}^{\prime }/m^2$. Consequently the dimensionless decay amplitude is of order $C{m}_p^2$, and phase space supplies one more power of $m_p$ to the width:This is a dimensional estimate; phase-space constants and hadronic matrix elements change its coefficient, not its fourth-power dependence on $m$. For order-one couplings and $m_p\sim 1\mathrm{GeV}$, the stated lifetime limit is ${\tau }_p\gtrsim 10^{40}\times 10^{24}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-1}=10^{64}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-1}$. Therefore $m^4\gtrsim 10^{64}{\mathrm{GeV}}^4$, giving $\boxed{m\gtrsim 10^{16}\mathrm{GeV}}$.

Such a mass is incompatible with the intended weak-scale MSSM explanation of the hierarchy problem: squarks that cancel the Higgs-sector sensitivity to high scales must not introduce a new enormous splitting from their light quark partners. For example, $m\sim 10^3\mathrm{GeV}$ with order-one couplings would give only ${\tau }_p\sim 10^{12}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{-1}\sim 10^{-12}\mathrm{s}$. The field content alone does not mathematically prohibit extremely heavy superpartners, but that choice sacrifices the weak-scale naturalness motivation. The usual resolution is conserved R-parity, or sufficiently suppressed simultaneous baryon number and lepton number violation, rather than making the exchanged squark this heavy.

A stable symmetry-breaking minimum requires $\lambda >0$ and $m^2<0$. Put $v^2=-m^2/\lambda >0$. The common scalar potential can then be written, up to a constant, asIts minima form the sphere $\Phi \cdot \Phi =v^2$. Choose the vacuum direction ${\Phi }_0=(0,0,v{)}^T$. If instead $m^2>0$ with positive $\lambda$, the minimum is at the origin and the assumed nonzero vacuum expectation value is not a stable vacuum of these models.

In the ungauged theory, the internal symmetry is global $O(3)$; its connected part is $SO(3)$. Constant orthogonal transformations preserve both the kinetic term and the potential. The chosen vacuum is invariant under $O(2)$ acting on its first two components, so the continuous breaking is $SO(3)\to SO(2)$ with two broken generators. The vacuum orientations are genuinely different degenerate global vacua.

The global triplet scalar symmetry breaking is visible directly in the fluctuation masses. Write $\Phi =({\pi }_1,{\pi }_2,v+h{)}^T$. The potential Hessian isThe quadratic Lagrangian is thereforeThere is one radial scalar of mass $m_h^2=2\lambda v^2=-2m^2$ and two massless Goldstone bosons. The two Goldstone modes describe motion tangential to the vacuum sphere. They remain physical, since a global rotation has only constant parameters and cannot remove arbitrary spacetime-dependent fluctuations. All three original real-scalar degrees of freedom remain. Interactions persist: the shifted potential is $V-V_{\min }=\frac{\lambda }{4}(2vh+h^2+{\pi }_1^2+{\pi }_2^2{)}^2$, containing cubic and quartic terms. Masslessness of the angular modes is protected by the exact continuous symmetry through Goldstone's theorem.

In the gauged theory, the three-component real field is the vector representation of local $SO(3)$, equivalently the Adjoint representation of $SU(2)$. The center of $SU(2)$ acts trivially on this field, so both descriptions have the same local field content and perturbative spectrum. Take $(t^a{)}_{bc}=-i{ϵ}^{abc}$, for which $[t^a,t^b]=i{ϵ}^{abc}{t}^c$. The covariant kinetic term and the gauge kinetic term are invariant under local transformations with the associated connection transformation. The scalar inversion $\Phi \mapsto -\Phi$, with the gauge field unchanged, is also a discrete invariance of the displayed action.

The vacuum leaves rotations about its third axis unbroken. The residual gauge group is $SO(2)$, or the corresponding $U(1)$ subgroup in the $SU(2)$ description. Expanding the covariant kinetic term about ${\Phi }_0$ givesThus the gauge-boson mass matrix is $g^2{v}^2\mathrm{diag}(1,1,0)$. The third generator annihilates the vacuum, while the first two do not. The masses are $m_{B^1}=m_{B^2}=gv$, $m_{B^3}=0$, and $m_h=\sqrt{2\lambda }v$.

The quadratic derivative mixing displays what happens to the Goldstone fields. With the generator convention just chosen,Local rotations can set the two angular fields to zero in unitary gauge. Then $\Phi =(0,0,v+h{)}^T$ andThe two Goldstone modes supply the longitudinal polarizations of the two massive vector bosons. They do not survive as additional physical massless scalars. The radial scalar is still physical, and $B^3$ retains only two transverse polarizations. This adjoint triplet Higgs spectrum realizes the Higgs mechanism; the gauge group is only partially broken, so one massless gauge boson remains.

The degree-of-freedom check isIn contrast, the global theory has just the three scalar modes, including its two physical Goldstone bosons. A vacuum expectation value in the local theory is a choice of gauge-fixed description: the direction can be changed by gauge transformations and is not itself an observable. Gauge-independent masses and the physical degree count express the actual effect. Both theories retain Lorentz symmetry in the constant scalar vacuum.

The hierarchy problem begins with a large separation of scales: the weak scale is much smaller than possible unification or gravitational scales. A fundamental scalar mass is especially sensitive to a much heavier scale. In an effective description with ultraviolet cutoff $\Lambda$, one schematically findsThe coefficient $c$ contains gauge, scalar and Yukawa couplings, with different signs for bosonic and fermionic loops. The explicit quadratic cutoff dependence is regulator-dependent, but a heavy physical particle coupled to the Higgs produces a threshold correction of order its mass squared. That heavy-threshold sensitivity is the physical difficulty.

The technical hierarchy problem asks whether a small scale, once chosen, remains stable under such radiative corrections. Maintaining $m_H^2\ll {\Lambda }^2$ by cancelling unrelated bare and loop contributions, and readjusting the cancellation at successive orders, is the naturalness concern. It is different from explaining why the small scale was chosen in the first place. Supersymmetry primarily supplies protection against the technical instability; a complete explanation of the origin of supersymmetry-breaking scales needs additional dynamics.

The relevant comparison of mass types is:

In exact supersymmetry, each supermultiplet has matched bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom, with their interaction strengths related. Opposite loop signs then give supersymmetric cancellation of quadratic divergences. This is not just equality of state counts: the supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings is also essential. A schematic paired-loop contribution has the high-momentum formFor equal partner masses the displayed contributions cancel. With a small splitting, the difference falls as $(m_F^2-m_B^2)/p_E^4$, so the remaining ultraviolet sensitivity is logarithmic, proportional to the splitting rather than to ${\Lambda }^2$.

Realistic partners need not have exactly equal masses. Soft supersymmetry breaking permits scalar squared masses, gaugino masses and suitable trilinear interactions without restoring the unwanted quadratic sensitivity. Typically,up to coefficients and threshold details. Squarks and sleptons can therefore be heavier than their chiral fermion partners while the scalar sector remains stable against the much larger ultraviolet scale. Nevertheless, very large soft masses, particularly in the Higgs-coupled sector, leave large finite or logarithmic corrections and require tuning. This soft scalar-mass sensitivity remains after the quadratic divergence has cancelled. Supersymmetry solves the quadratic radiative instability when breaking is suitably soft; it does not make arbitrarily heavy superpartners natural or explain the entire hierarchy by itself.

Assume $\lambda >0$ and $v>0$. The vacuum manifold is the sphere $|\varphi |=v$. Choose ${\varphi }_0=v{e}_3$. For the given generators, $t^3{\varphi }_0=0$ whereas $t^1{\varphi }_0$ and $t^2{\varphi }_0$ are nonzero and independent. The Adjoint representation of SU(2) rotates this sphere, and the full connected stabilizer subgroup of $v{e}_3$ is generated by $t^3$. Hence the classical symmetry pattern isThe central element of SU(2) acts trivially on the triplet and belongs to this stabilizer; it does not add a separate broken direction. The gauge-field-free representative has zero gauge field strength and constant scalar magnitude. Locally near this nonzero classical vacuum, unitary gauge aligns the triplet along the third axis.

First make the gauge normalization explicit. Write the gauge kinetic term as $-\mathcal{N}{F}_{\mu \nu }^a{F}^{a\mu \nu }/4$, where $\mathrm{Tr}(t^a{t}^b)=\mathcal{N}{\delta }^{ab}$ if $F=F^a{t}^a$ is the matrix used inside the printed trace. Canonical normalization of a gauge kinetic term givesFor a conventionally normalized component trace, $\mathcal{N}=1$ and $g_c=g$. If the trace is the ordinary matrix trace in the displayed three-dimensional representation, $\mathrm{Tr}(t^a{t}^b)=2{\delta }^{ab}$ and $\mathcal{N}=2$. The PDF does not specify which trace convention is intended; both are covered by this formula.

In unitary gauge, the gauge covariant derivative isExpanding this kinetic term and the scalar potential gives the complete physical-field LagrangianHere a square of a vector means its contraction with the Minkowski metric, in signature $(+---)$. The labels 1 and 2 represent massive vectors; 3 represents the surviving Abelian vector.

To display their charge and all interactions more clearly, put $a_{\mu }={\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }^3$, $W_{\mu }^{\pm }=({\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }^1\mp i{\mathcal{A}}_{\mu }^2)/\sqrt{2}$, and defineWith the sign of gauge field strength printed in the paper, ${\mathcal{F}}^3=f+i{g}_{c}C$ and $G^{\pm }=({\mathcal{F}}^1\mp i{\mathcal{F}}^2)/\sqrt{2}$. Thus the same Lagrangian becomesThe physical masses areIn particular, literal adjoint matrix trace gives $m_W=gv/\sqrt{2}$; the standard canonical component convention gives $m_W=gv$. These are descriptions with differently normalized couplings, not different physical spectra.

The complex vector pair carries opposite charges under the unbroken U(1) gauge symmetry. The gauge field strength terms contain $a{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ cubic interactions, $aa{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$ quartic interactions, and four-vector interactions involving the charged fields. There is no pure Abelian cubic or quartic self-interaction. The Higgs mode $\eta$ has cubic and quartic scalar interactions and couples through $2g_c^{2}v\eta W^{+}{W}^{-}+g_c^2{\eta }^2{W}^{+}{W}^{-}$. It is neutral and has no tree-level $\eta aa$ interaction. This is the physical charged-vector Lagrangian for an adjoint SU2 Higgs model.

If the angular fields ${\pi }_1$ and ${\pi }_2$ were retained, their vanishing potential masses would identify the two Goldstone bosons of the ungauged triplet. In the gauge theory they mix with the broken-direction gauge fields and can be removed by gauge fixing; the Higgs mechanism uses them as the longitudinal polarizations of the two massive vectors. They are not additional physical massless scalars. The physical degrees of freedom are conserved: $3+3\times 2=9$ before rearrangement, and $1+2\times 3+2=9$ afterwards.

This is not the Standard Model electroweak interaction. It has three original gauge bosons, leaving two massive charged vectors and one massless neutral vector, with no massive neutral Z boson. The Standard Model instead has $SU(2{)}_L\times U(1{)}_Y$, a complex Higgs doublet, and three massive vectors plus the photon. Its charge is $Q=T_3+Y$, not just the surviving $T_3$. Adding fermions cannot supply the missing gauge generator or turn the surviving neutral vector into both a photon and a Z boson. In particular, the usual right-handed fermions in the Standard Model are SU(2) singlets; they would have zero charge if only $T_3$ were available, instead of the charges produced by hypercharge.

Take the Minkowski metric with signature $(+---)$ and a coupling $e\ne 0$. For a charged scalar field use the gauge covariant derivativeA scalar electrodynamics Lagrangian isAny real potential bounded below and depending only on the modulus gives gauge invariance. Indeed,The derivative of the phase cancels the shifted gauge field in the first identity; commuting partial derivatives proves the second. These identities verify invariance of every term, including the interaction hidden in the kinetic term.

For an unbroken example choose $V=m_{\varphi }^2|\varphi {|}^2+\lambda |\varphi {|}^4$ with $m_{\varphi }^2>0$ and $\lambda >0$. The minimum is at zero. There is no vector mass term in the quadratic expansion and no Higgs mechanism. Pure electromagnetic theory has a neutral massless spin-one photon with two physical transverse polarizations, equivalently helicities $+1$ and $-1$; longitudinal and time-component polarizations are gauge redundancies. In the unbroken scalar theory, the same massless photon is accompanied by a spin-zero charged particle and its oppositely charged antiparticle, both of mass $m_{\varphi }$. A complex scalar has two real physical degrees of freedom, rather than two unrelated charged species.

For a Higgs example chooseThe vacuum modulus is nonzero. Around one vacuum representative, unitary gauge removes the phase and writes $\varphi =(v+h)/\sqrt{2}$. ThenThus the quadratic spectrum isThe gauge boson is a massive spin-one particle with three polarizations, and $h$ is a neutral massive spin-zero Higgs boson. The scalar phase supplies the longitudinal vector polarization; it is not an extra physical massless Goldstone boson. The degree count is unchanged: two massless-vector polarizations plus two scalar degrees become three massive-vector polarizations plus one radial scalar degree. The underlying gauge invariance remains a redundancy of the description.

For the two-charge theory, useand retain the same gauge transformation of $a_{\mu }$. Both derivatives transform with the phase of their own field. A manifestly stable two-charge scalar gauge potential is, for positive $m_{\varphi }^2,M^2,{\lambda }_{\varphi },{\lambda }_{\psi }$, $g\ge 0$ and a nonzero complex constant $b$,Since $\psi -b{\varphi }^2$ has charge $2e$, its modulus is gauge-invariant. Expanding its square exhibits the direct couplingIn particular the charge in ${\psi }^{\ast }{\varphi }^2$ is $-2e+2e=0$, which uses the stated charge ratio. The potential is real, bounded below and has the zero-field minimum, while the kinetic terms have the standard positive signs. A complete example is thereforeThere is genuine direct interaction even with $g=0$ because $b\ne 0$. In four spacetime dimensions $b$ has mass dimension $-1$, but the expanded potential contains only quadratic, cubic and quartic field monomials; the cubic coefficient $M^{2}b$ has dimension one. Thus the example is also power-counting renormalizable.

Use the hypercharge normalization $Q_{\mathrm{electric}}=T^3+Y$. All matter chiral superfields are written with left-handed Weyl spinors, so the fields denoted by a superscript $c$ contain the charge conjugates of the usual right-handed Standard Model fermions. The MSSM superfield representations areEach fermion generation contributes the first five chiral superfields. Their complex scalar field partners are squarks for the quarks and sleptons for the leptons. Each Higgs chiral doublet contains a Higgs complex scalar field and a higgsino. Every chiral superfield also has a complex auxiliary field. The vector superfields areThey contain the corresponding gauge bosons, gauginos in the Adjoint representation, and real auxiliary fields. A right-handed neutrino chiral superfield is not part of the minimal field content.